Next Article in Journal
Through the Lens of Workers’ Motivation: Does It Relate to Work–Family Relationship Perceptions?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Bibliometric Retrospection of CSR from the Lens of Finance and Economics: Towards Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanics Modeling and Simulation Analysis of a Novel Articulated Chassis for Forestry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visualizing the Knowledge Base and Research Hotspot of Public Health Emergency Management: A Science Mapping Analysis-Based Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Scientific Research and Trends Regarding Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis

by
Mazhar Ali Jarwar
1,*,
Stefano Dumontet
1,
Rosa Anna Nastro
1,
M. Esther Sanz-Montero
2 and
Vincenzo Pasquale
1
1
Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University Complutense Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 16114; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316114
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SafeMetrics-Quantitative Science Studies for Safety Science)

Abstract

:
Microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) offers a host of interesting features, from both theoretical and practical standpoints. This process was firstly investigated as a geo-biological mechanism involved in carbonate mineral formation in both rocks and soil. The interest in its practical use has significantly increased in recent years, as MICP has been used in different fields, such as oil recovery, the improvement of soil geotechnical characteristics, and concrete healing. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first attempt to carry out a bibliometric descriptive study of publications concerning MICP. We analyzed data from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), which provides comprehensive information for bibliometric analysis, including the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). The bibliometric analysis was carried out on 1580 publications, from 2000 to August 2022, and included publication output; author; institution; country; collaborations between authors, institutes, and countries; and citation frequency. We created visualization maps, including research collaborations, using the VOSviewer program. MICP, carbonate precipitation, cementation, and soil improvement in terms of geotechnical properties are frequently used keywords. Although in the year 2000, only two papers were published on MICP, the number of publications has increased rapidly since 2014. In 2021, 333 papers were published. China leads the pack as the most productive country, followed by the USA and Australia. According to our results, the number of research papers has dramatically increased in the last 5 years. MICP use for concrete healing/cementation and soil geotechnical improvement, as well as the low environmental impact of such a technique, are becoming very popular topics among researchers. With the aging of concrete buildings, as well as with the worsening of environmental pollution and soil alterations, the research regarding MICP will play an ever increasing and crucial role in civil engineering and geotechnical fields, as well as in soil science. MICP also address Sustainable Development Goal 11, “building sustainable cities and communities.” Nevertheless, our study pointed out a concentration of the MICP studies in just a few countries. Russia and Brazil, for instance, seem to poorly contribute to MICP research. Greater cooperation among countries, along with the extension of the research network on this topic, would foster more rapid progress in MICP studies, from both practical and speculative standpoints.

1. Introduction

Carbonates represent a major reservoir of carbon on the Earth (about 41.9% of the total carbon on our planet) and microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) plays a prominent role within the global carbon cycle [1]. The study of the role of microbial mineral precipitation in a natural environment takes place at the interface between microbiology and geology and includes the understanding of both autotrophic and heterotrophic metabolic pathways. MICP played a crucial role in mineral deposition during geological eras, as proved by the geological record [2,3,4]. Calcium carbonate minerals forming stalactites, stalagmites, microbialites, stromatolites, and thrombolites represent examples of minerals produced by the activities of microorganisms, and the overall effect of such a microbial activity extends up to landscapes morphology [2,4].
The first published paper dealing with the ability of bacteria to induce carbonate precipitation dates back to the early 19th century [5]. Later, the ability to precipitate CaCO3 has been considered as a general phenotype among bacteria [6,7]. According to Dupraz et al. [2], MICP includes two different processes: microbially induced mineralization (where metabolic activities of living microorganisms induce conditions for mineral precipitation), and biologically influenced mineralization (where dead or metabolically inactive microbial cells, along with environmental factors, lead to a passive precipitation of minerals).
The precipitation of Ca carbonates and, in general, of Ca minerals, is shared among different domains of microorganisms other than bacteria. Cyanobacteria [3,5,8], fungi [9], algae [10,11,12], and even some vascular plants have been proved to be involved in calcite precipitation [13]. Altermann et al. [14] estimated that cyanobacteria have been the main contributors to the production of carbonate rocks during nearly 70% of the Earth’s history. Since then, the importance of cyanobacteria in carbonation has been extensively investigated, with particular regards to the molecular mechanisms driving calcite precipitation in Synechocystis spp and Synecococchus spp [3,5]. Over the years, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas nitroreducens, and Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, Sporosarcina pasteurii [15,16,17] became the most studied bacteria, and have been widely used in practical applications for soil consolidation and concreate healing due to their ability to produce high amounts of calcite within a short period of time [16,18,19,20].
Since 2000, the relevance of MICP in the wider frameworks of environmental microbiology and engineering applications has greatly increased. Some significant studies involving microbial induced calcite precipitation, applied to the geotechnical improvement of soil and concrete healing, have been published within the first decade of the 2000s [21,22,23,24,25,26]. The interest in the potential geotechnical use of MICP is currently growing, and it is fueling research in the field of soil consolidation and the use of microorganism in concrete healing. Bu et al. [27] reviewed MICP soil improvement, discussing in detail the mineralization mechanism, its technological importance, and its effects on soil with different characteristics. As the concrete healing process through MICP is strongly dependent on the metabolic characteristics of the microorganism involved in the process, many current studies are focused on finding microbial strains with highly calcite-precipitating properties. Of particular interest is the work of Sohail et al. [28], who investigated the self-healing process in concrete through microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) carried out by a strain of Bacillus cereus isolated from soil in Qatar. However, soil stabilization, as well as biocementation, are not the only topics boosting the interest in MICP. MICP also addresses the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11, “building sustainable cities and communities” [29]. Such an interest spans a wide range of topics, from the role of MICP in fossil formation and the preservation of traces of life in ancient rocks, to the contribution of microorganisms to ancient and modern geochemical cycles of C and Ca, to the investigation of new methods to capture and store carbon, to the removal of heavy metal pollutants or radionuclides (e.g., Ra, Sr.) from environmental samples through co-precipitation with CaCO3, to the use of carbonate biominerals to enhance oil recovery [5].
The conspicuous number of studies and review articles concerning MICP and its practical applications makes it necessary to organize, summarize, and quantify the recent developments in the field in order to have a clear overall picture of the present state, as well as the future directions of the research. Bibliometric analysis, defined as the use of mathematical methods to analyze published articles in terms of quantity, quality, and impact, is an important and common method used to assess research activity on a certain topic [30]. Further, it has proved to be a useful tool to quantitatively assess trends and patterns of scientific literature [31,32]. Bibliometric analysis can help to interpret the research trend and the development status by assessing the authors, institutions, countries, and link strength based on keywords associated with publications, paving a pathway for future studies [32,33].
Even though bibliometric analysis has been widely used in the field of environmental sciences, very few studies focus on environmental microbiology or geomicrobiology. Some examples of bibliometric analysis in the field of microbial ecology are given by Qi et al. [34], who analyzed the research status and development trend of algae-bacteria symbiotic wastewater treatment technology between 1998 and 2017, and of Vanzetto and Thome [35], who investigated the toxicology of nanoscale zero valent iron used in soil remediation by bibliometric analysis. However, to best of our knowledge, no studies have yet attempted to analyze the structure, links, and future research avenues in regards to MICP. This paper aims at exploring the scientific literature on MICP based on keywords analysis; the most productive authors; the most cited published paper; the most productive institutes and countries; collaboration between authors, countries, and institutes; as well as to highlight the interest of the scientific journals in this topic over the past 22 years.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

Scientific output data was extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), one of the most widely used daily updated databases in academic and bibliometric studies, allowing the download of full citation records [36]. WoSCC can provide comprehensive information for bibliometric analysis, including the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). In this study, the WoSCC database was used to retrieve the related research on microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for the period from 2000 to 2022, filtered within the scope and research based strictly on MICP. The language of the analyzed papers is limited to English, with an overall number of 1580 publications. We downloaded and exported the collected data (which included full records) in text format for further analysis. All data were exported on 30 August 2022, to avoid deviations caused by the daily updates of this database.

2.2. Bibliometric Network Analysis

We performed the study of the global scientific research and trends regarding MICP through a bibliometric network analysis carried out according to Reuters [37]. We based our study on the visualized analysis of mapping knowledge domain (MDK) and on the implementation of a social network analysis (SNA) [38]. While MKD can be used to establish a reference information and research basis for the application and development of methods of a chosen domain, SNA is defined as the process of investigating social structures using networks and the graph theory [31,38]. SNA and maps based on network data allow the application of systems thinking in bibliometric science. The outputs of such analysis are network maps and statistics based on the relationships among countries, journals, organizations, authors, and keywords related to the investigated topic [39].
In this study, we used the VOSviewer software (version 1.6.18) to perform the bibliometric analysis. This software, using the VOS (visualization of similarities) mapping technique, is especially useful for displaying large bibliometric maps in an easy-to-interpret way, while allowing the creation and exploration of maps based on bibliometric network data. The output results are displayed in clusters to visualize the existing connections among the analyzed bibliometric data. VOSviewer software is a useful tool for the elaboration of distance-based maps in which the distance between two items reflects the strength of the relationship between the items. Unlike graph-based maps, in distance-based maps, a smaller distance generally indicates a stronger relationship [40].
Table 1 summarizes the main technical terms used by the software. We implemented co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation analyses to create distance-based network maps showing: (1) the co-authorship among researchers and the collaborations of countries, (2) the co-occurrence of keywords, and (3) cited scientific journals.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Document Types

As of 30 August 2022, 1580 articles related to MICP were identified and classified into eight document types indexed in the Web of Science (Table 2). The article was the most frequently used document type, consisting of 86.01% of the total publications, followed by conference proceeding papers (11.13%). Review papers contributed 4.11%, early access, 1.9%; book chapters, 0.06%; editorial materials, 0.31%; and meeting abstracts 0.06%, all of which showed lower numbers than articles and conference proceedings. It is obvious that the articles and conference proceedings, with the largest proportion of results, may satisfactorily reflect the development trends and changes in this research field. Some research reports on original works were classified as article and proceedings at the same time, which caused the sum of the percentile of all types to be greater than 100%.

3.2. Publications and Citations Trend Analysis

The Web of Science database search resulted in 1580 publications on “MICP” in the period from 2000 to 31 August 2022 (date on which the analysis was performed). Both the cumulative citation index and number of publications show an increasing trend in the investigated timeframe. Over the last 10 years, the number of publications has increased significantly, and the topic of calcite precipitation has been studied more frequently. From the year 2000 to 2015, as it can be seen in Figure 1, the number of publications dramatically increased and therefore, so do the citations. In 2010, only 10 papers were published on the topic of MICP, but in 2021, 333 papers were published worldwide covering this topic, proving the emerging importance of MICP.

3.3. Countries and Collaborations Network Analysis

In 2000, only two papers were published on the topic of MICP, and both were published by researchers from China. Meanwhile, 71 countries carried out research on MICP by the end of 2021, which indicates the increasing amount of research possibilities and interest this topic possesses. Among all participated countries, 9 countries have published more than 50 papers until August 2022, as shown in Figure 2. China is leading the research on MICP, with a total of 648 publications, followed by the USA (415), Australia (103), and India (87), respectively. The high output of publications in these countries can be explained by their strong economic strength and their huge investments in research, development, and innovation.
Academic cooperation between different countries or research institutions plays a guiding role in promoting the dissemination of knowledge and academic exchange among scholars [42]. The academic cooperation relationship among the top 10 countries of origin for publications from 2000 to 2022 is shown in Figure 3. The nodes in the figure represent different countries, the lines connecting the nodes indicate international cooperation between countries, and the thickness of the line represents the closeness of cooperation.
China and the USA are the most active countries regarding global cooperation on research regarding microbial induced calcite precipitation, and both are located at the center of the collaborative network. The USA and China both cooperated with 27 countries to publish MICP research, Australia ranked second, cooperating with 17 countries, followed by The Netherlands (15), England (15), India (12), and Iran (10). China and the USA showed the closest collaborations, and both countries collaborated very closely with Singapore. China also cooperated closely with Australia. There is still a large gap and a great deal of room for the development of cooperation between countries. For example, the USA and China, the two countries with the most publications, have never collaborated with Russia or Brazil.

3.4. Institutions and Collaborations Network Analysis

More than 1270 institutions have contributed to research on microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP). The top 10 institutes accounted for 37.24% of the total publications, with 549 published papers. China has 5 institutes in the top 10, followed by the USA, with 2 institutes. However, Japan, Singapore, and Australia each have 1 institute in the top 10. The China University of Petroleum ranked first, with 98 publications, followed by Nanyang Technological University, with 62 publications, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, with 59 publications, and the China University of Geoscience, with 56 publications.
The China University of Petroleum has had more papers published in the field of MICP, but Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, has collaborated with 18 institutes worldwide (Figure 4), followed by Chongqing University China, cooperating with 14 institutes, Jiangsu University, China, cooperating with 13 institutes, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the University of Hawaii, Manoa, each cooperating with 12 institutes. Most of the institutional collaborations are domestic, or with local institutes. Cooperation between institutions from different countries is crucial to the development and dissemination of knowledge; thus, international cooperation in this research field needs to be improved.

3.5. Authors and Collaborations Network Analysis

Nearly 3900 authors contributed to the research regarding microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) from 2000 to 2022. In China, researchers have produced more studies in this field (Figure 5), as 4 out of 10 top producing authors are from China or are associated with Chinese institutes, whereas 3 researchers are from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Singapore. Chu Jian from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, leads the pack, with 51 publications, followed by Kawasaki Satoru, from Hokkaido University, Japan, with 40 publications; Montoya Brina, from North Carolina State University, USA, and Cheng Liang, from Jiangsu University, both ranked third, with 36 Publications.
Figure 6 shows the collaboration between the top producing researchers. This network includes a large cooperation network and several small cooperation networks, which are not connected with each other. Chu Jian, from Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, collaborated with 23 different researchers around the world, tending to be the most productive and collaborative author. Liu Han Long, from Chongqing University, China, and Cheng Liang, from Jiangsu University, China, were the second-most collaborative researchers in the field of MICP, and they have collaborated with 16 researchers each. Xiao Yang, from Chongqing University, China, collaborated with 15 researchers. Surprisingly, Kawasaki Satoru (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), the second-most proliferative author in this field, after Chu Jian (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore), collaborated with only 8 researchers.

3.6. Most Cited Articles

Citation analysis is an important indicator to measure the quality of publications, and it represents both the interest raised by a research topic within academic circles and the attention scientific community pays to the work of a researcher [43]. The top 10 most-cited papers from 2000 until August 2022 in the field of MICP are listed in Table 3, in which the papers are classified according to the title, type, first author’s name, journal, total citations, and year of publication.
Our analysis highlights that most of the top cited papers were published by journals in the geotechnical engineering area (geotechnical and geoenvironmental engg.) Only one paper was published by a journal in the biological area (Applied Microbiology). This result shows that, despite the fact that MICP is a geo-biological process, practical applications in soil improvement, as well as construction materials reparation, garner the highest interest from the scientific community.

3.7. Journals Network Analysis

Figure 7 shows the top journals, in term of numbers of publications, regarding MICP. A total of 521 journals, with an impact factor (IF) ranging from 2 to 7, published papers on this topic. Construction and Building Materials (IF: 6.141) is the most productive journal, as it published 65 papers in this research area, accounting for 4.12% of the total papers published on this topic. It is followed by The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering (IF:4.346), with 61 published articles, accounting for 3.86% of the total publications. The Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering published 51 papers, followed by Geotechnical Special Publications, a collection of conference proceedings published by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) library, which published 47 papers. These results confirm that the engineering area is the field leading the research regarding MICP.

3.8. High Frequency Keyword Analysis

The research hotspots and overall trends in the field are accurately revealed by the analysis of the high frequency keywords, their links, and their total link strength [34]. The analysis of the keywords related to MICP generated 3443 results. Among them, only 299 met the threshold of at least 5 co-occurrences, which is 8.68% of the total count. A total of 143 keywords appeared 10 times, and 522 keywords appeared 3 times, which is 4.15% and 15.16% of the total, respectively. MICP was used 251 times, with total link strength of 1600, as shown in Table 4, followed by carbonate precipitation, which co-occurred 213 times, with total link strength of 1361.
The co-occurrence network map of keywords is shown in Figure 8, in which the bigger the size of the circle, the higher the co-occurrence of an item. Moreover, the shorter the distance between items, the stronger their relationship. MICP was linked with 257 researched items, followed by carbonate precipitation, cementation, improvement, sand etc.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we explored different aspects of the research on microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP). We performed a bibliometric analysis based on 1580 publications, from the year 2000 to 2022, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliometric analysis allowed for the quantification and visualization of the multi-disciplinary development of MICP, an understanding of the most productive authors, institutes, countries, and journals, along with future research directions. The most active research field is geotechnical engineering, and China is the leading country regarding published studies. Russia and Brazil are not highly involved in international networks, showing the presence of a great gap for the development of cooperation in this research field. An extension of the research network is needed to foster progress in the field of MICP.
Concrete healing or bio cementation, soil improvement, and consolidation through MICP are the main topics of focus. Further, our results show that a high scientific production by an author rarely occurs in the presence of a wide network of international collaboration.
We believe our paper provides important information to the scientific community, offering, for the first time, a relatively objective and comprehensive bibliometric analysis regarding the MICP research field. As with other studies, there are still some limitations due to incomplete search items, and some relevant articles may have been missed. In addition, only articles written in English were included, so there is a chance that some important articles, written in other languages, were also missed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.J.; methodology, M.A.J. and S.D.; software, M.A.J.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.J. and S.D.; writing—review and editing, S.D., V.P., R.A.N. and M.E.S.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by the Department of Science and Technology, University of Naples, Parthenope and partially supported by Universidad Complutense de Madrid group 910404.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, T.; Dittrich, M. Carbonate Precipitation through Microbial Activities in Natural Environment, and Their Potential in Biotechnology: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dupraz, C.; Reid, R.P.; Braissant, O.; Decho, A.W.; Norman, R.S.; Visscher, P.T. Processes of carbonate precipitation in modern microbial mats. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2009, 96, 141–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lamérand, C.; Shirokova, L.S.; Bénézeth, P.; Rols, J.-L.; Pokrovsky, O.S. Carbon sequestration potential of Mg carbonate and silicate biomineralization in the presence of cyanobacterium Synechococcus. Chem. Geol. 2022, 599, 120854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoffmann, T.D.; Reeksting, B.J.; Susanne, G. Bacteria-induced mineral precipitation: A mechanistic review. Microbiology 2021, 167, 001049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Görgen, S.; Benzerara, K.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Gugger, M.; Chauvat, F.; Cassier-Chauvat, C. The diversity of molecular mechanisms of carbonate biomineralization by bacteria. Discov. Mater. 2020, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boquet, E.; Boronate, A.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. Production of calcite (calcium carbonate) crystals by soil bacteria is a general phenomenon. Nature 1973, 246, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krumbein, W.E. On the precipitation of aragonite on the surface of marine bacteria. Die Nat. 1974, 61, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kamennaya, N.A.; Ajo-Franklin, C.M.; Northen, T.; Jansson, C. Cyanobacteria as biocatalysts for carbonate mineralization. Minerals 2012, 2, 338–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pasquale, V.; Fiore, S.; Hlayem, D.; Lettino, A.; Huertas, F.J.; Chianese, E.; Dumontet, S. Biomineralization of carbonates induced by the fungi Paecilomyces inflatus and Plectosphaerella cucumerina. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 140, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nash, M.C.; Diaz-Pulido, G.; Harvey, A.S.; Adey, W. Coralline algal calcification: A morphological and process-based understanding. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 0221396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samuels, T.; Bryce, C.; Landenmark, H.; Marie-Loudon, C.; Nicholson, N.; Stevens, A.H.; Cockell, C. Microbial weathering of minerals and rocks in natural environments. In Biogeochemical Cycles: Ecological Drivers and Environmental Impact; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2020; pp. 59–79. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mulec, J.; Kosi, G.; Vrhovšek, D. Characterization of cave aerophytic algal communities and effects of irradiance levels on production of pigments. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2008, 70, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ostrofsky, M.L.; Miller, C. Photosynthetically mediated calcite and phosphorus precipitation by submersed aquatic vascular plants in Lake Pleasant, Pennsylvania. Aquat. Bot. 2017, 143, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Altermann, W.; Kazmierczak, J.; Oren, A.; Wright, D.T. Cyanobacterial calcification and its rock-building potential during 3.5 billion years of Earth history. Geobiology 2006, 4, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferral-Pérez, H.; Galicia-García, M.; Alvarado-Tenorio, B.; Izaguirre-Pompa, A.; Aguirre-Ramírez, M. Novel method to achieve crystallinity of calcite by Bacillus subtilis in coupled and non-coupled calcium-carbon sources. AMB Express 2020, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jarwar, M.A.; Dumontet, S.; Pasquale, V.; Chen, C. Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation: Environments, Applications, and Mechanisms. Geomicrobiol. J. 2022, 39, 833–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rajasekar, A.; Moy, C.K.; Wilkinson, S.; Sekar, R. Microbially induced calcite precipitation performance of multiple landfill indigenous bacteria compared to a commercially available bacteria in porous media. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, 0254676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bang, S.S.; Galinat, J.K.; Ramakrishnan, V. Calcite precipitation induced by polyurethane-immobilized bacillus pasteurii. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2001, 28, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dhami, N.K.; Reddy, M.S.; Mukherjee, A. Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wei, S.; Cui, H.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, H.; He, H.; Fang, N. Biomineralization processes of calcite induced by bacteria isolated from marine sediments. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 46, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baumgartner, L.K.; Reid, R.P.; Dupraz, C.; Decho, A.W.; Buckley, D.H.; Spear, J.R.; Przekop, K.M.; Visscher, P.T. Sulfate reducing bacteria in microbial mats: Changing paradigms, new discoveries. Sediment. Geol. 2006, 185, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ben, C.K.; Rodriguez-Navarro, C.; Gonzalez-Muñoz, M.T.; Arias, J.M.; Cultrone, G.; Rodriguez-Gallego, M. Precipitation and growth morphology of calcium carbonate induced by Myxococcus xanthus: Implications for recognition of bacterial carbonates. J. Sed. Research. 2004, 74, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wright, D.T.; Wacey, D. Precipitation of dolomite using sulphate reducing bacteria from the Coorong Region, South Australia: Significance and implications. Sedimentology 2005, 52, 987–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Visscher, P.T.; Reid, R.P.; Bebout, B.M. Micro scale observations of sulfate reduction: Correlation of microbial activity with lithified micritic laminae in modern marine stromatolites. Geology 2000, 28, 919–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dupraz, C.; Visscher, P.T.; Baumgartner, L.K.; Reid, R.P. Microbe-mineral interactions: Early carbonate precipitation in a hypersaline lake (Eleuthera Island, Bahamas). Sedimentology 2004, 51, 745–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Riding, R.E. Microbial carbonate: The geological record of calcified algal mats and biofilms. Sedimentology 2000, 47, 179–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bu, C.; Lu, X.; Zhu, D.; Liu, L.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Wei, Q. Soil improvement by microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP): A review about mineralization mechanism, factors, and soil properties. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sohail, M.G.; Al Disi, Z.; Zouari, N.; Al Nuaimi, N.; Kahraman, R.; Gencturk, B.; Yildirim, Y. Bio self-healing concrete using MICP by an indigenous Bacillus cereus strain isolated from Qatari soil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 328, 126943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. UN DESA. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/ (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  30. Sweileh, W.M.; Shraim, N.Y.; Al-Jabi, S.W.; Sawalha, A.F.; AbuTaha, A.S.; Zyoud, S.E.H. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on carbapenem resistance (1986–2015). Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2016, 15, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Otte, E.; Rousseau, R. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J. Inf. Sci. 2002, 28, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, P.; Wu, D.; Wang, J. Bibliometric analysis of global research on white rot fungi biotechnology for environmental application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 1491–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, C.; Wu, K.; Wu, J. A bibliometric analysis of research on haze during 2000–2016. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 24733–24742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qi, Y.; Chen, X.; Hu, Z.; Song, C.; Cui, Y. Bibliometric analysis of algal-bacterial symbiosis in wastewater treatment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Vanzetto, G.V.; Thomé, A. Bibliometric study of the toxicology of nanoescale zero valent iron used in soil remediation. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. AlRyalat, S.A.S.; Malkawi, L.W.; Momani, S.M. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J. Vis. Exp. 2019, 152, 58494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reuters, T. Whitepaper Using Bibliometrics in Evaluating Research. 2008, Volume 12. Available online: http://openscience.ens.fr/MARIE_FARGE/CONFERENCES/2014_12_02_BIBLIOMETRIE_ET_EVALUATION_DE_LA_RECHERCHE_ABDU_PARIS/InCites_Thomson-Reuters.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  38. Zou, X.; Yue, W.L.; Le Vu, H. Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018, 118, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, D.; Liu, Z.; Luo, Z.; Webber, M.; Chen, J. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.18, CWTS Meaningful Metrics; Universiteit Leiden: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2022; Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.18.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  42. Chen, W.; Geng, Y.; Zhong, S.; Zhuang, M.; Pan, H. A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 23503–23513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, M.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Song, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, Z. Bibliometrical analysis of hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 28206–28226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of publications and citations in the field of MICP from 2000 to August 2022.
Figure 1. Number of publications and citations in the field of MICP from 2000 to August 2022.
Sustainability 14 16114 g001
Figure 2. Top 15 countries with the highest number of publications from 2000 to August 2022.
Figure 2. Top 15 countries with the highest number of publications from 2000 to August 2022.
Sustainability 14 16114 g002
Figure 3. The academic collaboration networks among the top productive countries.
Figure 3. The academic collaboration networks among the top productive countries.
Sustainability 14 16114 g003
Figure 4. The academic collaboration networks among the top productive institutes.
Figure 4. The academic collaboration networks among the top productive institutes.
Sustainability 14 16114 g004
Figure 5. Most productive authors ranked by number of publications.
Figure 5. Most productive authors ranked by number of publications.
Sustainability 14 16114 g005
Figure 6. The academic collaboration networks among the top producing authors.
Figure 6. The academic collaboration networks among the top producing authors.
Sustainability 14 16114 g006
Figure 7. Top journals publishing work regarding microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP).
Figure 7. Top journals publishing work regarding microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP).
Sustainability 14 16114 g007
Figure 8. Keyword co-occurrence network map based on total link strength.
Figure 8. Keyword co-occurrence network map based on total link strength.
Sustainability 14 16114 g008
Table 1. Terminology used by VOS viewer software version 1.6.18 [41].
Table 1. Terminology used by VOS viewer software version 1.6.18 [41].
TermDescription
ItemsObjects of interest (e.g., publications, researchers, keywords, authors).
LinkConnection or relationship between two items (e.g., co-occurrence of keywords).
Link strengthAttribute of each link, expressed by a positive numerical value. In the case of co-authorship links, the higherthe value, the higher the number of publications the two researchers have co-authored.
NetworkSet of items connected by their links.
ClusterSets of items included in a map. One item can belong to only one cluster.
Number of linksThe number of links of an item with other items
Total link strengthThe cumulative strength of the links of an item with other items.
Table 2. Types of publications concerning microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) from 2000 to August 2022.
Table 2. Types of publications concerning microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) from 2000 to August 2022.
RankDocument TypesNumbersPercentage (%)
1Articles135986.013
2Proceedings Papers17611.139
3Review Articles654.114
4Early Access301.9
5Book Chapters10.063
6Editorial Materials50.316
8Meeting Abstracts10.063
Table 3. Top 10 most-frequently cited publications from 2000 to 2022.
Table 3. Top 10 most-frequently cited publications from 2000 to 2022.
RankTitlePaper TypeFirst AuthorJournal/ConferenceTotal CitationsYear
1Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shearArticleJason DeJongGeotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engg.7882006
2Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: A reviewProceedings PaperWillen De Maynck1st Int. Conference on BioGeoCivil Engg.6992010
3Quantifying Biomediated Ground Improvement by Ureolysis: Large-Scale Biogrout ExperimentArticleLeon van PaassenGeotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engg.4572010
4Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcementProceedings PaperMarien P Harkes1st Int. Conference on BioGeoCivil Engg.3672010
5Factors Affecting Efficiency of Microbially Induced Calcite PrecipitationArticleAhmed Al QabanyGeotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engg.3392012
6Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturationArticleLiang ChengCanadian Geotechnical3362013
7Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soilsArticleAhmed Al QabanyGeoTechnique2882013
8Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitationArticleBrina MortensenApplied Microbiology2862011
9Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applicationsArticlePeriasamy AnbuSpringerplus 52782016
10Experimental Optimization of Microbial-Induced Carbonate Precipitation for Soil ImprovementArticleBelen Carro MartinezGeotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engg.2542013
Table 4. Top 10 keywords, frequencies, and total link strength.
Table 4. Top 10 keywords, frequencies, and total link strength.
KeywordFrequencyLinkTotal Link Strength
MICP2512571600
Carbonate Precipitation2132181361
Cementation1711881223
Improvement1651951136
Sand130175913
Bacteria129186974
Biomineralization114176879
Soil improvement96160685
Urease94157715
Bio Cementation86163696
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jarwar, M.A.; Dumontet, S.; Nastro, R.A.; Sanz-Montero, M.E.; Pasquale, V. Global Scientific Research and Trends Regarding Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316114

AMA Style

Jarwar MA, Dumontet S, Nastro RA, Sanz-Montero ME, Pasquale V. Global Scientific Research and Trends Regarding Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jarwar, Mazhar Ali, Stefano Dumontet, Rosa Anna Nastro, M. Esther Sanz-Montero, and Vincenzo Pasquale. 2022. "Global Scientific Research and Trends Regarding Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316114

APA Style

Jarwar, M. A., Dumontet, S., Nastro, R. A., Sanz-Montero, M. E., & Pasquale, V. (2022). Global Scientific Research and Trends Regarding Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. Sustainability, 14(23), 16114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop