Participatory Assessment of Potato Production Systems and Cultivar Development in Rwanda
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hawkes, J.G. Origins of cultivated potatoes and species relationships. In The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement, 2nd ed.; Bradshaw, J.E., Mackay, G.R., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1994; pp. 3–42. [Google Scholar]
- CIP. Annual Report; Centro Internacional de la Papa: Lima, Peru, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Haverkort, A.J.; Struik, P.C.; Visser, R.G.F.; Jacobsen, E. Applied biotechnology to combat late blight in potato caused by Phytophthora infestans. Potato Res. 2009, 52, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthoni, J.; Shimelis, H.; Melis, R.; Kinyua, Z.M. Response of potato genotypes to bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) (Yabuuchi et al.) in the tropical highlands. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 90, 301–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- FAO. Proportion of Potato Production by Region; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2021; Available online: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed on 17 October 2022).
- Kaguongo, W.; Kashaija, I.; Ntizo, S.; Kabira, J.N. Risk of uncontrolled importation of seed potato from Europe to East and Central Africa: What are the policy options. In Potato and Sweetpotato in Africa: Transforming the Value Chains for Food and Nutrition Security, Proceedings of the Based on African Potato Association 9th Triennal Conference, Naivasha, Kenya, 30 June–4 July 2013; Nyongesa, M., Wasilwa, L., Low, J., Wanjohi, L., Eds.; CABI International: Wallingford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Muhinyuza, J.B.; Shimelis, H.; Melis, R.; Sibiya, J.; Nzaramba, M.N. Participatory assessment of potato production constraints and trait preferences in potato cultivar development in Rwanda. Int. J. Dev. Sustain. 2012, 1, 358–380. [Google Scholar]
- MINAGRI. Annual Report; Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources: Kigali, Rwanda, 2021.
- Munyemana, A.; Von Oppen, M. La Pomme de Terre au Rwanda: Une Analyse D’une Filière a Hautes Potentialités; Centro Internacional de la Papa: Lima, Peru, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Labarta, A.R. The genetic improvement of potato and sweetpotato in sub-Saharan Africa. In Diffusion of Improved Varieties in Africa (DIVA) Project Report on Objective 1; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical: Cali, Colombia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- ISAR. Annual Report; Institut des Sciences Agronomiques du Rwanda: Kigali, Rwanda, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Muhinyuza, J.B.; Nyiransengiyumva, S.; Nshimiyimana, J.C.; Kirk, W.W. The effect of the application frequency and dose of mancozeb on the management of potato late blight in Rwanda. J. Appl. Biosci. 2008, 3, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
Region | Harvested Area (×1000 ha) | Production (×1000 T) | Tuber Yield (T ha−1) |
---|---|---|---|
Africa | 1,828 | 25,026 | 13.7 |
Asia | 9,325 | 184,937 | 19.8 |
Europe | 4,823 | 109,783 | 22.8 |
Latin America | 1,051 | 20,161 | 19.2 |
North America | 5,550 | 26,390 | 47.9 |
World | 17,584 | 366,298 | 20.8 |
Country | Tuber Harvest (T) |
---|---|
Algeria | 4,928,028 |
Egypt | 4,800,000 |
Malawi | 4,535,955 |
South Africa | 2,252,000 |
Rwanda | 2,240,715 |
Kenya | 2,192,885 |
Commodity | Tuber Harvest (T) |
---|---|
Plantain and banana | 2,749,150 |
Potato | 1,789,400 |
Cassava | 1,377,210 |
Dry bean | 840,072 |
Sweet potatoes | 327,497 |
Cultivar | Year of Release | First Year NARS Testing | CIP No. (or Other Source) | Pedigree |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘Atzimba’ | 1980 | 1972 | 720,045 | ‘Leona’ × PEN3PD-23 |
‘Montzama’ | 1980 | 1972 | 720,049 | ‘Furore’ × (US129.2 ´× ‘Katahdin’) |
‘Sangema’ | 1980 | 1972 | 800,949 | Mutation of ‘Rosita’ |
‘Muhabura’ | 1980 | 1976 | ||
‘Bufumbira’ | 1980 | 1976 | ||
‘Gahinga’ | 1984 | 1980 | 720,097 | Furore × Greta |
‘Gasore’ | 1984 | 1980 | 800,955 | ‘Gracilia’ × ‘Soraya’ |
‘Nseko’ | 1984 | 1980 | 720,055 | 54-Q-2 × ‘Amarilla de Puebla’ |
‘Petero’ | 1984 | 1980 | ||
‘Kinigi’ | 1984 | 1980 | 378,699.2 | ‘Puca Toralapa’ × YY-1 |
‘Cruza 148’ | 1985 | 1981 | 720,118 | ‘Montserrate’ × unknown |
‘Mabondo’ | 1988 | 1982 | 800,983 | 720097 × 378676.6 |
‘Kirundo’ | 1989 | 1982 | ||
‘Turbo’ | 1989 | 1982 | (SM 80-13) | SM 69-17 × VE 74-45 |
‘Obelix’ | 1989 | 1982 | (ZPC 77 L 55) | ‘Ostara’ × ‘Renska’ |
‘Ngunda’ | 1992 | 1988 | 381,395.1 | 378,493.915 × Bulk Mexico |
‘Mizero’ | 1992 | 1987 | 386,003.2 | BL-2.9 × R128-6 |
‘Gikungu’ | 1992 | 1988 | 387,233.24 | 382,124.6 × India 1039 |
‘Mugogo’ | 1992 | 1988 | 383,140.6 | 37,493.738 × Bulk Plaisted |
‘Nderera’ | 1992 | 1984 | 381,381.3 | 378,493.915 × Bulk Precoz |
‘Kigega´ | 1992 | 1988 | 383,120.14 | VHF-69.1 × Bulk Mexico |
‘Victoria´ | 1989 | 1996 | 381,381.2 | 378,493.15 × Bulk Precoz |
No. | Parentage | Code | Tuber Yield (T/ha) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ‘Gikungu’ × 22M83 | RWPOT012.8 | 17.65 |
2 | ‘Gikungu’ × 22M88 | RWPOT012.12 | 21.12 |
3 | ‘Gikung’ × 3M73 | RWPOT012.16 | 24.84 |
4 | ‘Kinigi’ × 22M85 | RWPOT012.28 | 20.54 |
5 | ‘Kinigi’ × Nderera M10 | RWPOT012.29 | 24.40 |
6 | ‘Nderera’ × 22M34 | RWPOT012.31 | 21.02 |
District | Number of Years Growing Potato | Number of Times per Year Growing Potato | Size of the Largest Plot Growing with Potato (ha) |
---|---|---|---|
Mean | Mean | Mean | |
Musanze | 17 | 3 | 2 |
Burera | 11 | 2 | 2 |
Nyamagabe | 12 | 2 | 2 |
District | Male | Female | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Musanze | 27 (71.0) | 11 (29.0) | 38 (26.4) |
Burera | 32 (57.1) | 24 (42.8) | 56 (38.9) |
Nyamagabe | 28 (56.0) | 22 (44.0) | 50 (34.7) |
District | Total Farm Size (ha) | Total Cultivated Land (ha) |
---|---|---|
Mean | Mean | |
Musanze | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Burera | 1.0 | 0.6 |
Nyamagabe | 1.4 | 1.0 |
Crop | Income Generation | Family Food Use | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage | Mean Area (ha) | Percentage | Mean Area (ha) | |
Potato | 56.5 | 0.5 | 41.5 | 0.5 |
Maize | 13.6 | 0.2 | 23.1 | 0.2 |
Vegetables | 2.2 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 0.4 |
Peas | 3.9 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 0.2 |
Beans | 11.5 | 0.2 | 18.8 | 0.2 |
Wheat | 9.7 | 0.3 | 5.1 | 0.3 |
Sweet potato | 2.2 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 0.2 |
Bananas | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Sorghum | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Tuber Planting Sources | Number of Farmers | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Own field | 5 | 3.5 |
Trader | 57 | 39.6 |
Open market | 52 | 36.1 |
Private company | 14 | 9.7 |
Research institution | 16 | 11.1 |
Constraint | District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musanze (N = 48) | Burera (N = 48) | Nyamagabe (N = 48) | ||||||
Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Overall Mean | Overall Rank | |
Late blight susceptibility | 45 | 3 | 27 | 5 | 45 | 3 | 39 | 4 |
Unclean tuber planting material | 43 | 4 | 36 | 2 | 42 | 4 | 40.3 | 3 |
Poor storage facilities | 26 | 7 | 35 | 3 | 29 | 6 | 30 | 6 |
Dormancy period | 32 | 6 | 16 | 8 | 28 | 7 | 25.3 | 7 |
Low yield | 46 | 2 | 34 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 42.3 | 2 |
Low price | 37 | 5 | 26 | 6 | 32 | 5 | 31.7 | 5 |
Lack of fertilizers | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 13 | 9 | 10.3 | 9 |
Lack of pesticides | 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 9.7 | 10 |
inaccessibility to Credit | 47 | 1 | 37 | 1 | 46 | 2 | 43.3 | 1 |
Soil degradation | 12 | 8 | 20 | 7 | 23 | 8 | 18.3 | 8 |
Mean | 30.5 | 24.9 | 31.7 | 29.02 |
Pests | District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musanze | Burera | Nyamagabe | ||||||
Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Overall Mean | Overall Rank | |
Late blight | 4.0 | 1 | 2.0 | 2 | 3.0 | 1 | 3.0 | 1 |
Bacterial wilt | 3.0 | 2 | 3.0 | 1 | 1.0 | 4 | 2.3 | 2 |
Viral diseases | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 2.0 | 2 | 1.3 | 3 |
Insect pests | 0.0 | 4 | 0.0 | 4 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.3 | 4 |
Overall Mean | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Type of Damage | Late Blight | Bacterial Wilt | Viruses |
---|---|---|---|
Complete crop loss | 9.1 | 5.6 | 5.7 |
Serious damage (+ 50%) | 18.2 | 31.0 | 14.7 |
Important damage (25–50%) | 29.8 | 26.5 | 26.6 |
Non-important damage (< 25%) | 29.6 | 24.3 | 36.4 |
Without damage | 13.3 | 12.6 | 16.6 |
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Cultivar | District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musanze | Burera | Nyamagabe | ||||||
Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Average | Ranking | |
‘Cruza’ | 1.4 | 7 | 1.2 | 4 | 3.2 | 1 | 1.9 | 5 |
‘Mabondo’ | 2.7 | 4 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.5 | 7 | 1.8 | 6 |
‘Makoroni’ | 1.1 | 9 | 1.1 | 6 | - | - | 1.1 | 9 |
‘Kirundo’ | 3.3 | 3 | 3.7 | 2 | 1.2 | 4 | 2.7 | 4 |
‘Victoria’ | 1.0 | 10 | 1.2 | 5 | 1.3 | 3 | 1.2 | 12 |
‘Gikungu’ | 0.5 | 14 | 1.0 | 7 | 0.4 | 8 | 0.6 | 17 |
‘Sangema’ | 0.0 | 15 | 0.4 | 10 | 0.7 | 5 | 0.4 | 20 |
‘Petero’ | 4.0 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 4.0 | 3 |
‘Kinigi’ | 4.1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 4.1 | 2 |
‘Nyirakabondo’ | 0.9 | 12 | - | - | - | - | 0.9 | 14 |
‘Nyabizi’ | 1.7 | 6 | - | - | - | - | 1.7 | 7 |
‘Bineza’ | 1.0 | 11 | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 13 |
‘IPP’ | 0.8 | 13 | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 16 |
‘Kigega’ | 1.7 | 5 | - | - | 0.2 | 9 | 0.9 | 11 |
‘Rwishaki’ | 1.3 | 8 | - | - | - | - | 1.2 | 10 |
‘Rutuku’ | - | - | 4.6 | 1 | - | - | 4.6 | 1 |
‘Mbumbe’ | - | - | 0.4 | 12 | - | - | 0.4 | 22 |
‘Nderera’ | - | - | 0.4 | 11 | - | - | 0.4 | 21 |
‘Mizero’ | - | - | 0.7 | 8 | - | - | 0.7 | 15 |
‘Makerere’ | - | - | 0.6 | 9 | - | - | 0.6 | 18 |
‘Gasore’ | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | 10 | 0.1 | 23 |
‘Nyirangeli’ | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 11 | 0.0 | 24 |
Local | - | - | - | - | 1.4 | 2 | 1.4 | 8 |
‘Mugogo’ | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | 6 | 0.5 | 19 |
‘Kenya’ | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 12 | 0.0 | 25 |
District | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cultivar | Musanze | Burera | Nyamagabe | |||||
Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Average | Rank | |
Mabondo | 3.3 | 2 | 2.6 | 3 | 1.6 | 3 | 2.5 | 4 |
Cruza | 2.1 | 6 | 4.4 | 1 | 2.2 | 1 | 2.9 | 3 |
Kirundo | 2.6 | 4 | 2.0 | 4 | 0.5 | 8 | 1.7 | 8 |
Victoria | 1.0 | 11 | 0.0 | 10 | 0.8 | 5 | 0.6 | 16 |
Sangema | 0.0 | 15 | 0.3 | 8 | 0.9 | 4 | 0.4 | 17 |
Gikungu | 0.6 | 12 | 1.0 | 7 | 0.6 | 7 | 0.7 | 13 |
Kigega | 1.1 | 9 | - | - | 0.3 | 9 | 0.7 | 14 |
Makoroni | 2.9 | 3 | 1.9 | 5 | - | - | 2.4 | 5 |
Kinigi | 4.5 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 4.5 | 1 |
Petero | 2.1 | 5 | - | - | - | - | 2.1 | 6 |
Nyirakabondo | 0.9 | 10 | - | - | - | - | 0.9 | 11 |
Bineza | 1.9 | 7 | - | - | - | - | 1.9 | 7 |
Nyabizi | 0.2 | 14 | - | - | - | - | 0.2 | 19 |
IPP | 0.3 | 13 | - | - | 0.3 | 18 | ||
Rwishaki | 1.3 | 8 | - | - | - | - | 1.3 | 10 |
Rutuku | - | - | 4.2 | 2 | - | - | 4.2 | 2 |
Makerere | - | - | 0.0 | 11 | - | - | 0.0 | 23 |
Nderera | - | - | 0.8 | 6 | - | - | 0.8 | 12 |
Mizero | - | - | 0.1 | 9 | - | - | 0.1 | 21 |
Gasore | - | - | 0.6 | 6 | 0.6 | 15 | ||
Mugogo | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 12 | 0.0 | 24 |
Nyirangeli | - | - | - | - | 0.2 | 10 | 0.2 | 20 |
Local | - | - | - | - | 1.8 | 2 | 1.6 | 9 |
Kenya | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | 11 | 0.1 | 22 |
Characteristic | District | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Musanze | Burera | Nyamagabe | Overall | |||||
Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | Mean | Rank | |
High yield | 4.2 | 1 | 4.4 | 1 | 4.1 | 1 | 4.2 | 1 |
Host plant resistance | 3.6 | 3 | 3.4 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 | 3.5 | 2 |
Good taste | 0.4 | 6 | 0.8 | 6 | 0.5 | 6 | 0.6 | 6 |
Short dormancy | 1.1 | 5 | 0.9 | 5 | 1.4 | 5 | 1.1 | 5 |
Early maturity | 1.9 | 4 | 2.0 | 4 | 2.0 | 4 | 1.9 | 4 |
High dry matter content | 3.8 | 2 | 3.7 | 2 | 2.7 | 3 | 3.4 | 3 |
District | Cultivars | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Musanze, Burera and Nyamagabe | ‘Kinigi’, ‘Kirundo’, ‘Rutuku’ and ‘Mabondo’ | High tuber yield and dry matter content, marketability, host plant resistance to late blight, big tuber size and round tuber shape | Susceptibility to bacterial wilt |
Musanze | ‘Petero’ | High tuber yield and dry matter content | Susceptibility to pathogens and pests |
Musanze, Burera and Nyamagabe | ‘Cruza’ | High tuber yield, host plant resistance to pathogens, tolerance to poor acidic soil | Low dry matter content, small-to medium tuber size, late maturity |
Nyamagabe | Local | Host plant resistance to pathogens and pests | Late maturity, small tuber size, low yield |
Musanze, Burera and Nyamagabe | ‘Victoria’ | High tuber yield, big tuber with round shape, early maturity | Susceptible to pathogens, low dry matter content |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Muhinyuza, J.B.; Mukamuhirwa, A.; Mutimawurugo, M.C.; Mazimpaka, J.D.; Muhinyuza, D.G.; Rios, R.O.O. Participatory Assessment of Potato Production Systems and Cultivar Development in Rwanda. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416703
Muhinyuza JB, Mukamuhirwa A, Mutimawurugo MC, Mazimpaka JD, Muhinyuza DG, Rios ROO. Participatory Assessment of Potato Production Systems and Cultivar Development in Rwanda. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24):16703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416703
Chicago/Turabian StyleMuhinyuza, Jean Baptiste, Alphonsine Mukamuhirwa, Marie Chantal Mutimawurugo, Jean Damascène Mazimpaka, Delitha Girumugisha Muhinyuza, and Rodomiro Octavio Ortiz Rios. 2022. "Participatory Assessment of Potato Production Systems and Cultivar Development in Rwanda" Sustainability 14, no. 24: 16703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416703
APA StyleMuhinyuza, J. B., Mukamuhirwa, A., Mutimawurugo, M. C., Mazimpaka, J. D., Muhinyuza, D. G., & Rios, R. O. O. (2022). Participatory Assessment of Potato Production Systems and Cultivar Development in Rwanda. Sustainability, 14(24), 16703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416703