Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical Perspectives for Gender Equality in Sustainable Cities and Communities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Geography Education for Sustainable Development: Teacher Education Challenges
2.2. Role of GIS in Supporting ESD: The Importance of Implementing SDGs 11 and 5 in Education
3. Methodology
- Are the teachers able to participate in a collaborative mapping process in order to create knowledge for a concrete SDG?
- Are prospective teachers aware of the gender equality situation of their city’s street map?
- How prepared are geography teachers to teach sustainability, particularly SDG numbers 5 and 11?
- Are any particular needs of training (pre and in service) identified to improve teaching and learning sustainability, particularly SDG numbers 5 and 11?
3.1. Context and Participants
3.2. Learning Design: Collaborative Mapping for Effective Teaching of SDGs 5 and 11
Workshop for Collaborative Mapping
3.3. Collaborative Mapping Methodology
3.4. Upload Zaragoza to the Web Viewer Las Calles de las Mujeres and Analyze and Reflect on the Situation in Zaragoza: Women’s Urban Planning
3.4.1. Historic City Center
3.4.2. City Extensions until the Mid-Seventies of the 20th Century
3.4.3. Social Housing Developments
3.4.4. Recent Neighborhoods Planned in 1968, 1986, and 2001 Master Plans
3.4.5. Suburban Districts
3.4.6. Streets Not Included in the Aforementioned Groups
3.5. Design of Learning Activities
4. Results
- Dimension 1: Knowledge of the SDGs from trainee teachers.
- Dimension 2: Pedagogical knowledge and selected learning strategies.
- Dimension 3: Urban geographical knowledge: the city of Zaragoza as a laboratory for urban sustainability.
- Dimension 4: Gender and urban inclusion awareness.
- Dimension 5: SDG teaching competencies.
4.1. Knowledge of the SDGs
4.2. Pedagogical Knowledge
4.3. Urban Geographical Knowledge
4.4. Gender and Urban Inclusion Awareness
4.5. SDG Teaching Competence
- Do you think the MyGEOGirls workshop could be used to teach SDGs 5 and 11 to social studies students?
- Why?
- Define your didactic design.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Future Research Orientations
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Miguel, R. Europe in a global context: Eurogeo and the role of geography and European geographers. Eur. J. Geogr. 2019, 10, 160–176. [Google Scholar]
- De Miguel, R.; Donert, K.; Koutsopoulos, K. (Eds.) Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Georgeson, L.; Maslin, M. Putting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into practice: A review of implementation, monitoring and finance. Geo Geogr. Environ. 2018, 5, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liverman, D. Geographic perspectives on development goals: Constructive engagements and critical perspectives on the MDGs and the SDGs. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 2018, 8, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liverman, D. Development goals and geography: An update and response. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 2018, 8, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nightingale, A. Geography’s contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Ambivalence and performance. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 2018, 8, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, F. An(Other) geographical critique of development and SDGs. Dialogues Hum. Geogr. 2018, 8, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, B. Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geogr. Sustain. 2020, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.; Kidman, G.; Wi, A. Issues in Teaching and Learning of Education for Sustainability; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Meadows, M. Geography Education for Sustainable Development. Geogr. Sustain. 2020, 1, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sprenger, S.; Nienaber, B. (Education for) sustainable development in geography education: Review and outlook from the perspective of Germany. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 2017, 42, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Lázaro, M.; Borderías, P.; Morales, F. Citizen and Educational Initiatives to Support Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation for All. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jeronen, E. Geography Education Promoting Sustainability; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- De Miguel, R. Geographical and geospatial competences from school education to higher education: The contribution of EUROGEO in the international projects. J. Res. Didact. Geogr. (J-READING) 2021, 2, 10. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Towards a Sustainable Europe by 2030; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- SDSN. Accelerating Education for the SDGs in Universities: A Guide for Universities, Colleges, and Tertiary and Higher Education Institutions; Sustainable Development Solutions Network: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals—Learning Objectives; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Albareda-Tiana, S.; García-González, E.; Jiménez-Fontana, R.; Solís-Espallargas, C. Implementing Pedagogical Approaches for ESD in Initial Teacher Training at Spanish Universities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albareda-Tiana, S.; Vidal-Raméntol, S.; Pujol-Valls, M.; Fernández-Morilla, M. Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reinfried, S.; Schleicher, Y.; Rempfler, A. (Eds.) Geographical Views on Education for Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the Lucerne-Symposium, Lucerne, Switzerland, 29–31 July 2007; Geographiedidaktische Forschungen. p. 42. [Google Scholar]
- De Miguel, R. From international to global understanding: Toward a century of international geography education. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 2021, 3, 202–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yli-Panula, E.; Jeronen, E.; Lemmetty, P. Teaching and Learning Methods in Geography Promoting Sustainability. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sebastián, M.; de Miguel, R. Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kidman, G.; Chang, C.; Wi, A. Defining education for sustainability. A theoretical framework. In Issues in Teaching and Learning of Education for Sustainability; Chang, C., Kidman, G., Wi, A., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Rickles, P.; Ellul, C.; Haklay, M. A suggested framework and guidelines for learning GIS in interdisciplinary research. Geo Geogr. Environ. 2017, 4, e00046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.E.; Stonier, F. GIS in-service teacher training based on TPACK. J. Geogr. 2015, 114, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Miguel, R.; de Lázaro, M.L. WebGIS Implementation and Effectiveness in Secondary Education Using the Digital Atlas for Schools. J. Geogr. 2020, 119, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, T. WebGIS in education. In Geospatial Technologies and Geography Education in a Changing World: Geospatial Practices and Lessons Learned; Muñiz, O., Demirci, A., van der Schee, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 105–115. [Google Scholar]
- Kerski, J.; Baker, T. Infusing educational practice with Web GIS. In Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education; de Miguel, R., Donert, K., Koutsopoulos, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Kerski, J. What Are the 10 Most Important Educational Benefits That GIS Fosters? ESRI: Redlands, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Fargher, M. The Role of Geography and Geospatial technologies in taking on the world. In Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education; de Miguel, R., Donert, K., Koutsopoulos, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 175–182. [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez, J.; de Lázaro, M.L. Education in Sustainable Development Goals Using the Spatial Data Infrastructures and the TPACK Model. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- García, A.; Peinado, M. LOMCE: ¿es posible construir una ciudadanía sin la perspectiva de género? Iber Didact. Cienc. Soc. Geogr. Hist. 2015, 80, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
- Gryl, I.; Jekel, T. Spatially Informed Citizenship Education as an Approach for Global Understanding. In Geography Education for Global Understanding; Demirci, A., de Miguel, R., Bednarz, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Swizterland, 2018; pp. 43–56. [Google Scholar]
- Goodchild, M. Citizens as sensors: Web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information. Geofocus 2008, 7, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
- Criado, J.I.; Guevara-Gomez, A. Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times. A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 2021, 15, 612–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spellman, K.; Mulder, C. Validating herbarium-based phenology models using citizen-science data. BioScience 2016, 66, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domroese, M.; Johnson, E. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 208, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwan, M. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2002, 92, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlovskaya, M.; Martin, K. Feminism and geographic information systems: From a missing object to a mapping subject. Geogr. Compass 2007, 1, 583–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, G. Feminism and Geography; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, E.; Salvador, R. Lesbian collaborative web mapping: Disrupting heteronormativity in Portugal. Gend. Place Cult. 2015, 22, 954–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, C. HarassMap: Using crowd sourced data to map sexual harassment in Egypt. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2014, 4, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, Z.; Mooney, P.; de Sabbata, S.; Dowthwaite, L. Quantifying gendered participation in OpenStreetMap: Responding to theories of female (under) representation in crowd sourced mapping. GeoJournal 2020, 85, 1603–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- González, M. Geochicas, Improving How Open Mapping Represents the World. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium, 11–16 July 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 40–42. [Google Scholar]
- Álvarez, G.; Baselga, C.; Gaudó, C.; Romeo, C.; Torres, I.; Verón, A. Paseos por la Zaragoza de las Mujeres; Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Romeo, C.; Álvarez, G.; Baselga, C.; Gaudó, C. Callejero: La Zaragoza de las Mujeres; Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- De Miguel, R. Geomedia for Education in Sustainable Development in Spain. An experience in the framework of the aims of Digital-Earth.Eu. Eur. J. Geogr. 2012, 3, 44–56. [Google Scholar]
- De Miguel, R. Transformación urbana y procesos territoriales recientes en Zaragoza y su espacio metropolitano. Estud. Geográficos 2015, 278, 63–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marco, R.; Buil, C. Zaragoza 1908–2008. Arquitectura y Urbanismo; Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Aragón: Zaragoza, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Monclús, J.; Labarta, C.; Díez, C.; Agustín, L.; Bergera, I. Paisajes Urbanos Residenciales en la Zaragoza Contemporánea; Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Costa, J.; Cancela, D.; Reis, J. Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-González, E.; Jiménez-Fontana, R.; Azcárate, P. Education for Sustainability and the Sustainable Development Goals: Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions and Knowledge. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, A.; Flacke, J.; Martinez, J.; Aguilar, R.; van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M. Knowing My Village from the Sky: A Collaborative Spatial Learning Framework to Integrate Spatial Knowledge of Stakeholders in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
SDG | Geographical Branches | |
---|---|---|
1 | No poverty | Social and economic geography |
2 | Zero hunger | Social and rural geography |
3 | Good health and well-being | Social geography |
4 | Quality education | Social geography |
5 | Gender equality | Social geography |
6 | Clean water and sanitation | Hydrogeography |
7 | Affordable and clean energy | Industrial geography |
8 | Decent work and economic growth | Economic geography |
9 | Industry, innovation, and infrastructure | Transport and economic geography |
10 | Reduced inequalities | Regional geography |
11 | Sustainable cities and communities | Urban geography |
12 | Responsible consumption and production | Economic geography |
13 | Climate action | Climatology |
14 | Life below water | Biogeography and hydrogeography |
15 | Life on land | Biogeography |
16 | Peace, justice, and strong institutions | Political geography |
17 | Partnerships for the goals | Political geography |
Level | D1: Knowledge of the SDGs | D2: Pedagogical Knowledge | D3: Urban Geographical Knowledge | D4: Gender and Urban Inclusion Awareness | D5: SDG Teaching Competence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | They are not familiar with them. | ||||
2 | Their knowledge is vague. | ||||
3 | They know it and know how to explain it. | ||||
4 | They know it and know how to implement it in their teaching practice. |
Level | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | 18 | 70 | 40 | 5 |
Post-test | 5 | 23 | 85 | 20 |
Level | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | 81 | 41 | 11 | 0 |
Post-test | 3 | 16 | 24 | 90 |
Level | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | 101 | 28 | 4 | 0 |
Post-test | 4 | 12 | 85 | 32 |
Level | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | 122 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
Post-test | 39 | 37 | 25 | 32 |
Level | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-test | 8 | 68 | 55 | 2 |
Post-test | 5 | 10 | 84 | 35 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
de Miguel González, R.; Sebastián-López, M. Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical Perspectives for Gender Equality in Sustainable Cities and Communities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074042
de Miguel González R, Sebastián-López M. Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical Perspectives for Gender Equality in Sustainable Cities and Communities. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):4042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074042
Chicago/Turabian Stylede Miguel González, Rafael, and María Sebastián-López. 2022. "Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical Perspectives for Gender Equality in Sustainable Cities and Communities" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 4042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074042
APA Stylede Miguel González, R., & Sebastián-López, M. (2022). Education on Sustainable Development Goals: Geographical Perspectives for Gender Equality in Sustainable Cities and Communities. Sustainability, 14(7), 4042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074042