Next Article in Journal
Modelling Land Use and Land Cover in the Transboundary Mono River Catchment of Togo and Benin Using Markov Chain and Stakeholder’s Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Observed Changes in the Frequency, Intensity, and Spatial Patterns of Nine Natural Hazards in the United States from 2000 to 2019
 
 
Correction published on 20 October 2022, see Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13551.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021

1
Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
2
Enterprise Research Unit, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 4159; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074159
Submission received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 28 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022 / Corrected: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability)

Abstract

:
There may be unrecognised environmental and economic benefits in cultivating industrial hemp for CO2 sequestration in Ireland. By using a Systems Thinking approach, this study aims to answer how industrial hemp, which can sequester between 10 tonnes (t) to 22 t of CO2 emissions per hectare, has been helpful towards carbon sequestration efforts in Ireland. A mixed-methods design combining qualitative and quantitative secondary material is used to inform Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTGs) to illustrate the data from 2017 to 2021. In 2019 at its peak of hemp cultivation in Ireland the total CO2 emissions from agriculture was 21,156.92 kilotonnes, and the total land cultivated with hemp was 547 hectares which represented an estimated 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of agricultural land use. Based on a sequestration rate of between 10 t and 22 t of CO2, industrial hemp had the potential to remove between 5470 t and 24,068 t of CO2 in 2019. The total amount of estimated CO2 sequestrated between 2017 and 2021 was between 14,660 t and 64,504 t of CO2. This represents an estimated contribution in carbon tax equivalent of between €348,805 and €1,534,742, respectively.

1. Introduction

Sustainable development is “development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [1,2,3,4]. At the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” [5], the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) makes clear the links between climate change and sustainable development. The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Morocco in 2016 acted as the first meeting of the parties to the accord. The European Union (EU) has set a longer-term climate and energy policy goal of reducing CO2 emissions by 80–95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels and a target of 55% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2030 [6]. The EU decarbonisation Road map 2050 [7] incorporates a cap-and-trade system, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which aims at achieving these goals at the lowest possible cost. The overall objective of the EU Adaptation Strategy [8] is to contribute to a more climate-resilient Europe. The EU Adaptation strategy has three objectives, (1) promoting action by the Member States; (2) ”climate-proofing” action at the EU level; and (3) promoting better-informed decision making.
Ireland missed its 2020 European Union (EU) climate CO2 emissions target and is not on the right trajectory towards decarbonisation in the longer 2030 and 2050 challenges [9]. A report on progress toward meeting the EU Effort Sharing Decision (Decision No 406/2009/EU) [10] and (Regulation EU/2018/842) [11] CO2 emission reduction objectives for 2020 and 2030 is included in an updated prediction of Ireland’s total CO2 emissions to 2040 [12]. According to recent estimates from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [13], CO2 emissions will rise in most sectors in Ireland due to economic growth and the expansion of the agricultural dairy sector as a result of the Food Wise programme [14]. The transition of Ireland’s environment, society, and economy to a low-carbon, climate-resilient state while reaching national and international targets is a top issue for policymakers. Ag Climatise [15], is a climate and air road map for the agriculture sector. It states that more research and innovation, as well as the establishment of a climate- smart agriculture centre of excellence, agricultural CO2 emissions balanced by removals, and the extensive adoption of renewable energy on the farm, are all cross- cutting activities. Land management initiatives for re wetting carbon-rich soils to transform them from carbon sources to carbon sinks are also included in the road map. In addition, it contains an effort to develop a pilot scheme to reward farmers for their farm’s carbon benefit.
In the 1990s, hemp cultivation returned to the European Union (EU), and since 2016, Irish farmers can apply for a license to cultivate hemp. Industrial hemp is a strain of Cannabis Sativa that contains lower concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the narcotic component of cannabis and can be utilised as a carbon sink [16]. Hemp can sequester between 10 tonnes (t) and 22 t of CO2 per hectare [17,18,19,20,21], making it more efficient at CO2 sequestration than agroforestry [17,22]. In Ireland [23] researched industrial hemp as an energy crop by means of Life Cycle Assessment found that hemp production in Ireland might boost net CO2 abatement by up to 21 t CO2e annually by replacing 25% of oilseed rape (OSR) and sugar beet production. Hemp does not have to compete with food sources when it is integrated into food crop rotations.
The United Nations Commission on Narcotic Substances’ decision in December 2020 to remove medicinal cannabis from a category of harmful drugs (Schedule IV of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961) has reignited interest in cultivating the cannabis plant [24]. However, there is little research on the environmental and economic benefits of industrial hemp for CO2 sequestration. In Ireland, the current Programme for Government (PFG) commits to exploring the potential for growing fibre crops, including hemp, to see if the crop has a viable market [25]. Based on these policy objectives, this study aims to answer how industrial hemp has been helpful to carbon sequestration efforts in Ireland, which has a problem with rising CO2 emissions from agriculture and international financial, legal obligations and environmental policies to maintain. If industrial hemp can sequester CO2 at a rate of up to 22 t [17,18,19,20,21] per hectare and the current carbon tax is at a rate of €33.50 per tonne [26] then there may be unrecognised environmental and economic benefits in cultivating hemp for CO2 sequestration in Ireland.
The environmental impact in this study is measured by using the number of hectares of land used to cultivate industrial hemp and multiplying it by either 10 tonnes (t), 15 t or 22 t of CO2 per ha for each year from 2017 to 2021. The economic contribution is calculated by multiplying the total annual amounts of CO2 sequestered from industrial hemp by the appropriate carbon tax for that year. Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTGs), also known as time series or trend graphs and are sometimes referred to as reference mode activity, are created to visualise the data. In the business and economics communities, trend analysis implies recognising patterns from many periods and plotting them in a graphical manner to generate actionable information. BoTGs graphs are well-known components in System Dynamics approaches and can be beneficial in a variety of situations. The systems thinking approach can be applied with [27,28,29,30]. The BoTGs used to visualise the data in this study can be used as a reference point to understanding this complex system. Although industrial hemp can be cultivated twice annually, it is assumed for this study that one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated in Ireland between 2017–2021.
CO2 values absorbed by 1 hectare of hemp vary considerably according to the agronomic practices adopted and the biomass produced per hectare. CO2 sequestration potential is highly dependent on location, climate conditions and farming practices. Carbon storage in soils is hard to measure because its a slow process and also due to the variation in the use of fertilisers. The different combinations make the calculations complex, and methodological assumptions may lead to a wide range of results expressed on a per hectare basis [31]. The results are provided as a means of wide ranges which made it possible to draw insights from the historical data to ascertain the environmental and economic benefits and possible emerging implications of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland. When hemp is grown on a large scale and under certain conditions, it can more than double the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) rate in the atmosphere [32]; these calculations are not within the scope of this study.

2. Material and Methods

The study aims to qualify and quantify the benefits and limitations of outdoor cultivation of industrial hemp in Ireland. The paper aims to extend the breadth and range of inquiry by using mixed methods research design combining both qualitative and quantitative secondary data [33]. First, qualitative data in the form of environmental policy in Ireland is studied, followed by quantitative data analysis in the form of CO2 emissions and carbon tax. This will bring together a comprehensive account of the economic and environmental benefits and limitations of cultivating industrial hemp as an agricultural crop to sequestrate CO2. This is aimed at gaining an in-depth contextual knowledge and exploration of the environmental and economic benefits of hemp cultivated in Ireland. The results are reported in both narrative and quantitative terms. As a result, the contribution to the literature is a case study following [34,35].
An extensive exploration of relevant reports issued by the Government of Ireland were analysed to synthesise the knowledge on the environmental and economic benefits and limitations of cultivating industrial hemp for CO2 sequestration in Ireland. An electronic search was performed on the University of Limerick online library and Google Scholar. Searches included keywords such as Cannabis Sativa and industrial hemp in Ireland. Suitable papers were chosen throughout the years 2020 and 2022. In addition, reports from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Teagasc were reviewed to synthesise the critical information.
In 2021, secondary empirical data was obtained from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), which issue licenses on behalf of the Department of Health in Ireland. The application process for a hemp license in Ireland commences in January, are issued annually and are valid until 31 October of that year. The data is presented in the form of time series Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTGs), which are used in the system thinking approach to understanding complex systems. This aims to answer how industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland has contributed to CO2 sequestrating efforts since licensing was introduced in 2016. The study follows a case study protocol that captures the set of procedures involved in the collection of empirical material [36].

Data Collection and Analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring and assessment programs fulfil statutory reporting duties to the European Union and the Government of Ireland. The EPA data used for the study is based on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions final report 2020 [37], which was submitted by the EPA in March 2022. Ireland’s overall estimated CO2 emissions until 2040 are updated in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions projections 2019–2020 [12]. It includes an assessment of progress towards achieving the European Unions (EU) 2020 and 2030 CO2 emission reduction targets set out in the Effort Sharing Decision (Decision No 406/2009/EU) [10] and the Effort Sharing Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2018/842) [11]. The Teagasc Working Group on CO2 emissions has examined and prepared a study on the abatement potential of CO2 emissions in Irish agriculture from 2021 to 2030 [38] accessed on 29th March 2022.
The unit of measurement for carbon emissions is carbon dioxide CO2. For this study, each carbon unit is equal to one tonne (t) of CO2. The International System of Units (SI) base unit for mass is kilograms (kg), 1000 kg equals 1 tonne [39]. Globally CO2 emissions are measured in Gigatonne (Gt), 1 Gt is equal to 1 billion tonnes, 1 Megatonne (Mt) is equal to 1 million tonnes and 1 kilotonnes (kt) is equal to 1000 tonnes. One tonne of CO2 that has been removed from the atmosphere equivalent is measured as CO2e. Other greenhouse gases (GHGs) are quantified in terms of their Global Warming Potential (GWP) over 100 years as equivalents of carbon dioxide CO2. By definition CO2 has a GWP of 1 CO2 emission, CO2 sequestration is measured in tonnes (t), land use is measured in hectares (ha) while carbon taxes are calculated in euros per tonne. The carbon sequestration rate is calculated at 10 t, 15 t and 22 t per ha annually. The land area of Ireland is 6.9 million hectares, of which 4.9 million hectares or about 69% of total land area is used for agriculture and 773,229 hectares or about 11% of total area for forestry [40].
Plants with large biomass, such as hemp, can sequester more carbon through photosynthesis and then store it in the plant’s body and roots through biosequestration. Hemp stems store the most carbon, while roots and leaves store the least. Industrial hemp can sequester between 9 t to 28 t CO2e [17,31,41]. The carbon storage estimations for this study are as follows. A low scenario conservative estimation, a mid scenario mid estimation and a high scenario overestimation. This is based on hemp capturing between 10 t and 22 t of CO2 per hectare. The annual carbon sequestration estimations for hemp in this study are based on a single and double crop per year, as hemp can be cultivated twice annually. It is assumed due to the novelty of this crop and licensing timeline that only one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated. The different combinations make the calculations complex, and methodological assumptions may lead to a wide range of results expressed on a per hectare basis [31]. The results are provided as a means of wide ranges which made it possible to draw insights into the potential environmental and economic historical benefits and possible emerging implications of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland.
  • Low scenario conservative estimation: 1 hectare of industrial hemp on average sequesters 10 t of CO2 per hectare [19,42].
  • Mid scenario mid estimation: 1 hectare of industrial hemp on average sequesters 15 t of CO2 per hectare [43,44].
  • High scenario high estimation: 1 hectare of industrial hemp on average sequesters 22 t of CO2 per hectare [16,17,18,19,22].
The unit of analysis is the number of hemp licenses issued annually in Ireland and the number of hectares of land cultivating hemp in Ireland since 2016. Empirical secondary material was collected from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), which issue licenses on behalf of the Department of Health. All hemp licenses are issued annually. The application process for 2022 commenced in January 2022 and is valid until 31 October 2022. The data relating to licensing for this study was obtained from the HPRA in early 2021 and again in late 2021 and relates from the years 2016 to 2021. There was no data available for the number of hectares cultivated for 2016. Email correspondence was received from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA), Wednesday 12 May 2021 with the data for 2016 to 2020 and email correspondence received Wednesday 13 October 2021 regarding data for 2021.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Policies in Ireland

Like all countries, Ireland is committed to achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Ireland ratified an agreement on 4 November 2016 and is legally bound to fulfil the commitments made in Paris. The Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Act 2015 [45] was a turning point for the country. More recently at COP26 ‘Conference of the Parties’ [46] Ireland signed a global pledge for a 30% cut in methane emissions, to cut CO2 emissions by half by 2030 and attain net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050 [47]. Following the implementation of the Climate Action Plan [48] into law [49], Ireland has legally binding targets to reduce CO2 emissions by 51% by the end of the decade. Through its ’National 2050 Climate Objective,’ the state commits to accomplishing net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050 as part of its goal to create a climate-resilient and climate neutral economy. This means implementing changes to reduce CO2 emissions to the bare minimum and using offsets only as a last resort. As part of the Climate Action Plan 2017 [50], in terms of mitigation, the Act establishes the legal framework for the national goal of achieving a low-carbon transition by 2050 [51]. This comprises carbon-neutral agriculture and land use strategies, including forestry, that does not jeopardise long term food security. The scale of this challenge for all sectors is significant. As part of the plan, several new projects have been proposed to reduce CO2 emissions from agriculture [52].
The Programme for Government recognises the distinctive economic and social role agriculture plays in Ireland and commits to implementing initiatives to encourage and incentives farmers to farm in a more ecologically friendly and sustainable manner [52]. This aims to create a sustainable Irish agricultural sector that benefits farmers and rural communities while also protecting the environment and aligning with rising consumer attitudes. Appropriate strategies must be established to maximise soil CO2 sequestration potential and other ecological benefits [53]. These commitments have been followed with the Government of Ireland’s Interim Climate Actions [54] and Ireland’s CAP Strategic Plan 2023–2027 [55].

3.2. Environmental Research in Ireland

Ireland’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent public regulatory body that aims to protect and improve Ireland’s environment. Ireland’s overall estimated CO2 emissions until 2040 are updated in the projections [12]. It includes an assessment of progress toward attaining the EU’s 2020 and 2030 CO2 emission reduction targets set out in the Effort Sharing Decision (Decision No 406/2009/EU) [10] and the Effort Sharing Regulation (Regulation EU/2018/842) [11]. An assessment provided by [38] provides analysis of the possibilities for Irish agriculture in reducing CO2 emissions from 2021 to 2030.
Using a wide and diverse range of knowledge on CO2 emissions from across Teagasc and other organisations, the Teagasc Working Group on CO2 emissions examined and prepared a study on the abatement potential of CO2 emissions in Irish agriculture from 2021 to 2030. This was in response to the European Union’s (EU) Climate and Energy Package and the accompanying Effort Sharing Decision [10]. Teagasc released a report in 2012 following the development of the Food Harvest 2020 output targets. They reported the implications for CO2 emissions are numerous, and prompt mitigation action was essential, or the agricultural sector’s potential to grow in the medium to long term may be hampered.

3.3. Carbon Emission Targets

Ireland missed its European Union 2020 climate emissions target and is not on the right trajectory towards decarbonisation in the longer 2030 and 2050 challenges [12]. For the 2013–2020 period, the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) CO2 emissions inventory and projections [9] shows that Ireland did not meet its commitments under the Effort Sharing Decision (ESD). Ireland’s goal is to reduce CO2 emissions by 20% before 2025 in comparison to 2005 levels. Early projections indicate that CO2 emissions will be 8% lower than in 2005 (mostly from agriculture, transportation, and residential sectors).
Over the 2021–2030 period, under the With Existing Measures scenario, the amount of CO2 emissions associated with agriculture are projected to grow by 3.0% and will account for 39.7% of CO2 emissions by 2030 [50], reaching up to 21.9 million tonne CO2 emissions. This is predicted to grow steadily with a plan to increase the national herd [14]. Estimates by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [8] project that CO2 emissions will increase in most sectors especially, in the agriculture sector given the solid economic growth and the expansion of the agricultural industry [12]. The challenge of sustainability for Irish agriculture are discussed by [56].
Under the With Additional Measures scenario, CO2 emissions are expected to decrease to approximately 19 million tonnes by 2030, which means a 10% reduction. Ireland plans to mitigate 16.5 million tonnes CO2 through its Climate Action Plan, Ref. [48] which includes the measures from Teagasc’s Marginal Abatement Cost Curve, Ref. [13].
Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTGs), also known as time series or trend graphs and are sometimes referred to as reference mode activity, were created to visualise the data [37]. Figure 1 shows BoTG illustrating the historical CO2 emissions from agriculture in Ireland from 1990 to 2020

3.4. Carbon Tax

Ireland implemented a carbon tax in 2010. From 1 May 2013, to 1 May 2014, the carbon tax rate was €10 per tonne of CO2 emitted. As of 1 May 2014, the levy was raised to €20 per tonne. The Finance Act 2020 has planned increases in a carbon tax of €7.50 per tonne annually through to 2030. Budget 2021 implemented a €7.50 increase in the price per tonne, from €26 to €33.50. The increase for motor fuels took effect in October 2020, while the increase for solid fuels took effect in May 2021. The 2022 budget announced another €7.50 rise in the carbon price from €33.50 to €41.00 per tonne of CO2 emissions emitted [26]. The Climate Change Advisory Council of Ireland has recommended that carbon taxes be raised in order to minimise CO2 emissions. The Government’s Climate Action Plan [57] intends on implementing a carbon tax rate of at least €80 per tonne by 2030. Figure 2 shows Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) historical and projected carbon tax from 2010 through to 2030.
The Programme for Government has pledged to set aside €1.5 billion in estimated carbon tax receipts over the next ten years. An investment of €20 million in projected additional carbon tax receipts to fund pilot environmental programmes has been the first step towards reaching this goal. The €3 million in funding for agricultural programmes provided by carbon tax collections in 2020 was maintained, bringing the overall funding of carbon tax-supported measures in the farming sector to €23 million in 2021 [55]. The money will be used to build and operate the REAP programme, the Results-Based Environment Agri Pilot Program. Farmers participating in the programme will be paid for environmental functions such as biodiversity enhancement, improved water quality, improved soil health, and CO2 sequestration. Payments will be based on the quality of the environmental outcomes delivered [52].

3.5. Carbon Credits

Since 2013, Ireland has benefited from €367 million through the Kyoto protocol Effort Sharing Programme and will have to buy compliance to fulfil the 2020 targets. Ireland pays a lower price because they can offset years when they created less carbon than expected with years when they are producing more. This cost estimate is in addition to the State’s past acquisitions and agreements, which have totalled more than €120 million since 2007. According to the Department of Communications, Climate Action, and Environment, more carbon credits under the Kyoto Protocol would cost the State between €2 million and €13 million in 2020 [51]. This will depend on the cost of carbon at that time. The penalty for failing to meet climate commitments will rise dramatically from 2020.

3.6. Hemp Research in Ireland

Hemp research has been undertaken in Ireland by An Foras Taluntais or the Agricultural Institute, the predecessor to Teagasc since the 1960s. In more recent decades research has been carried out by [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Industrial hemp can be utilised as a carbon sink and can sequester up to 22 t of CO2 per hectare [17,18,19,22]. Ref. [61] grew industrial hemp in Ireland successfully over three years. They produced yields averaging 12.5 t/ha of entire stems at 15% m.c., which was very encouraging. Industrial hemp as a sustainable yearly energy crop in Ireland has been studied by [23] which resulted in a life cycle assessment of hemp versus other annual and perennial energy crops. Their research evaluated the CO2 emissions balance and farm economics of hemp produced for bioenergy. They compared two perennial bioenergy crops, Miscanthus and Willow, and two traditional annual bioenergy crops, sugar beet and oilseed rape (OSR). They found the CO2 emissions burden of hemp cultivation is intermediate between perennial and yearly conventional energy crops. The mid yield estimate’s net fuel chain CO2 abatement potential of 11t CO2e ha annually is comparable to perennial crops and 140% and 540% higher than the OSR and sugar beet fuel chains, respectively. By substitution 25% of OSR and sugar beet with industrial hemp, net CO2 abatement might increase to 21 t CO2e annually. They found that hemp is a more efficient biofuel feedstock than most annual energy crops and the gross margins were significantly lower than those of OSR and sugar beet [23].

3.7. Hemp Regulations in Ireland

Since 2016, Irish landowners can apply for a license to cultivate industrial hemp, a strain of Cannabis Sativa. Industrial hemp contains lower concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the narcotic component of cannabis. To obtain a license to cultivate industrial hemp, an application must be made to the Social Inclusion section of the Department of Health and Children. Before the provision of an application form from the Department of Health and Children to cultivation hemp, the following information must be provided to the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA). Name and address of the potential applicant; company registration documentation; specific identification of the lands or area for cultivation, including Ordnance Survey Maps where relevant; authorisation from the Gardaí to provide a statement to the Department of Health stating that there are no convictions recorded against the applicant; security arrangements for the crop; specific details of the seed variety that the potential applicant wishes to sow; information on the suppliers of the seeds; detailed information on the end-use of the crop, including the names of any customers to whom it will be supplied. As per regulation 5 and Schedule 2 (b) of the Misuse of Drugs (Designation) Order, SI 174 of 2017 [64], only hemp seeds recognised by the European Commission (EU) are allowed to be grown. Approved seed varieties can be obtained from the HPRA. Table 1 shows documentation required by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA).

3.8. Legal Instruments

The following are some of the legal instruments pertaining to cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland, source [65].
  • EU Regulation 1307/2013—establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy.
  • EU Regulation 1308/2013—establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products.
  • EU Delegated Regulation 639/2014—establishing the requirement to use certified seed of varieties listed in the ‘Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species’
  • EU Implementing Regulation 809/2014—establishing specific control measures and methods for determining tetrahydrocannabinol levels in hemp.
  • EU Delegated Regulation 2016/1237 and EU Implementing Regulation 2016/1239—establishing the import licenses rules for hemp.
  • EU Implementing Regulation 2016/1239—laying down rules for the application of EU Regulation 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the system of import and export licenses.
  • Council Directive 2002/53/EC—on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species.
  • Council Directive 2002/57/EC—on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants.
  • Council Decision 2003/17/EC—on the equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and on the equivalence of seed produced in third countries.

3.9. Hemp Cultivation in Ireland

The Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) on behalf of the Department of Health process license applications to cultivate industrial hemp in Ireland. Data was requested from the HPRA, and email correspondence was received on 12 May 2021 relating to the data from 2016 to 2020. A second email correspondence was received on 13 October 2021 regarding data for 2021. The number of licenses issued and area of land used to cultivate industrial hemp in Ireland since licensing was introduced in 2016 is as follows:
  • 2021: 76 licenses not more than 251 hectares
  • 2020: 94 licenses not more than 362 hectares
  • 2019: 74 licenses not more than 547 hectares
  • 2018: 24 licenses not more than 230 hectares
  • 2017: 16 licenses not more than 76 hectares
  • 2016: 7 licenses & no data
CO2 emissions and removals associated with land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), are reported in Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions inventory, including emissions and removals associated with Forest Land, Cropland, Grassland, Wetlands, Settlements and Other Land use. In a 2020 submission which relates to the previous year (2019) the land area of Ireland was 6.9 million hectares, of which 4.9 million hectares or about 69% of total land area was used for agriculture and 773,229 hectares or about 11% of total area for forestry [40] accessed 26 May 2022. The total land use of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland at its peak in 2019 represented 547 hectares or approximately 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of agricultural land use as seen in Table 2.
A Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTG) was created to illustrate the number of industrial hemp licenses issued and land used in Ireland between 2016–2021 as seen in Figure 3. The number of industrial hemp licenses issued is shown in grey and the number of hectares cultivated with industrial hemp is shown in green. There were 7 licenses issued in 2016 although there was no data available on the amount of land cultivated with industrial hemp.

4. Impact

The potential environmental and economic contribution of industrial hemp cultivation toward CO2 emissions in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 in terms of CO2 measured in tonnes and carbon tax measured in Euros can be seen in Table 3 and Table 4. The environmental impact is measured by using the number of hectares of land used to cultivate industrial hemp and multiplying it by either 10 t, 15 t, or 22 t of CO2 sequestrated for each year from 2017 to 2021 as seen in Table 3. The economic contribution is calculated by multiplying the total annual amount of CO2 sequestered from industrial hemp cultivated by the appropriate carbon tax for that year as seen in Table 4.

4.1. Potential Carbon Sequestration

The International System of Units (SI) base unit for mass is kilograms (kg), 1000 kg equals 1 tonne [39]. For multiples of the tonne, it is more usual to speak of thousands (kilotonnes), millions (megatonnes) or billion of tonnes (gigatonnes). Globally CO2 emissions are measured in Gigatonne (Gt), 1 Gt is equal to 1 billion tonnes, 1 Megatonne Mt is equal to million tonnes and 1 kilotonnes (kt) equals 1000 tonnes. For this study, each carbon unit is equal to one tonne (t) of CO2. One tonne of CO2 that has been removed from the atmosphere equivalent is measured as CO2e. The total CO2 emissions from agriculture in 2019 was 21,156.92 kilotonnes CO2e equivalent [37]. If 1 kilotonne equals 1000 tonne, then 21,156.92 kilotonnes equals 21,156,920 tonnes. Taking the low scenario estimation of 10 tonne (t) multiplied by number of hectares h/a cultivated 547 h/a equals 5470 tonnes of CO2 sequestrated.
At its peak in 2019, there were 547 hectares of industrial hemp cultivated in Ireland, which accounted for 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of total agricultural land use in Ireland. Due to the novelty of industrial hemp and the nature of the licensing timeline, it is assumed for this study that one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated annually during this time. The results that follow show the ranges of possible carbon sequestration from conservative estimates, mid estimates to overestimates of the possible CO2 sequestration benefits of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland.
Low scenario conservative estimate, based on a sequestration rate of 10 tonnes of CO2 [19,42], it is estimated a single cultivated crop could have sequester a total of 14,660 t of CO2 and a double crop could have sequestered 29,320 t of CO2 from 2017 to 2021.
Mid scenario mid estimates, based on a sequestration rate of 15 t of CO2 [43,44], it is estimated a single cultivated crop from 2017 to 2021 could sequester a total of 21,900 t of CO2 and a double crop could have sequestered 43,980 t of CO2 from 2017 to 2021.
High scenario overestimates, based on a gross sequestration rate of 22 t of CO2 per hectare [16,17,18,19,22], it is estimated a single cultivated crop could sequester up to 32,252 t of CO2 and a double crop could have sequestered a total of 64,504 t of CO2 from 2017 to 2021.
The results show in 2019 that at a conservative estimate of 5470 t of CO2 sequestration using 10 t per hectare for a single crop and a overestimate of 24,068 t of CO2 sequestration using 22 t for a double crop of hemp cultivated in Ireland, using 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of total agricultural land use in Ireland. Figure 4 Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTG) illustrates the estimated carbon sequestration from industrial hemp in Ireland from 2017 to 2021.

4.2. Estimated Economic Contribution towards Carbon Emissions

From 1 May 2013, to 1 May 2014, the carbon tax rate was €10 per tonne of CO2 emitted. As of 1 May 2014, the levy was raised to €20 per tonne. The Finance Act 2020 has planned increases in a carbon tax of €7.50 per tonne annually through to 2030. Budget 2021 implemented a €7.50 increase in the price per tonne, from €26 to €33.50. The increase for motor fuels took effect in October 2020, while the increase for solid fuels took effect in May 2021. The 2022 budget announced another €7.50 rise in the carbon price from €33.50 to €41.00 per tonne of CO2 emissions emitted [26].
The minimum and maximum estimated economic contribution of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 was between €348,805 and €1,534,742 carbon tax equivalent, based on the assumption that either 1 or 2 crops were cultivated annually for these years. In 2019 the economic contribution of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland was between €109,400 and €481,360 carbon tax equivalent, based on between 10 t and 22 t of CO2 sequestrated and the assumption that either 1 or 2 crops were cultivated for that year. Figure 5 shows BoTG illustrating the potential financial contribution for CO2 emissions shown as a carbon tax credit in Euros.

5. Discussion

5.1. Environmental Impact

The international academic community has long recognised the impacts of CO2 emissions on our climatic system. Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), countries have negotiated to work together to reduce CO2 emissions. In addition, the European Union (EU) has established a long-term climate and energy policy objective of cutting CO2 emissions by 80–95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. In July 2017, the Minister of Communications Climate Action and the Environment (DCCAE) in Ireland issued a plan [57]. In terms of mitigation, the Act establishes a legal foundation for the national goal of achieving a low-carbon transition by 2050 [49].
Sustainable agriculture entails maintaining the status quo or improving the local ecosystem’s environmental health [66]. A sustainable harvest strategy must take into account four interrelated factors: (1) the landscape, (2) communities and ecosystems, (3) plant populations, and (4) genetic diversity [67]. The international community faces a future in which it must balance the need to boost food and fibre production while also assisting farmers, foresters, fishers, and society in reducing CO2 emissions, strengthening resilience, and adapting to climate change consequences. In addition, agriculture and land use (including forestry) are critical to the development of renewable energy systems and the sequestration of CO2 from the atmosphere [15].
Due to hemp’s ability to re mediate contaminated soils through phytoremediation, convert high levels of atmospheric CO2 into biomass through bio sequestration, and produce bioenergy from hemp biomass, hemp has significant environmental benefits [17]. Hemp also has excellent potential to remove heavy metals from land [68]. It is a promising candidate species for soil remediation because of its high biomass output and ability to thrive in a variety of situations [69]. The fertiliser requirements vary with the type of hemp grown, whether for seed, fibre, or CBD oil and can require a wide range of nutrients [17]. Growing energy crops does not inflict a higher impact on the environment when compared to potato and wheat [70]. Cultivating hemp does not affect agricultural lands used for food production. It is also possible to incorporate hemp into other crops [71]. The use of the entire hemp plant could be the key to long-term economic, environmental, and social viability [72].
The results showed that in 2019, the total CO2 emissions from agriculture was 21,156.92 kilotonnes, and at its peak the same year, there were 547 hectares of industrial hemp cultivated, which accounted for 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of total agricultural land use in Ireland. The results show that in 2019 a conservative estimate of 5470 t of CO2 was sequestrated using 10 t per hectare for a single crop and a overestimate of 24,068 t of CO2 sequestrated using 22 t for a double crop.

5.2. Economic Impact

In Ireland, the agriculture, forestry, and land-use (AFOLU) sectors will have significant challenges meeting interim climate targets in 2020 and 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Mitigation of methane and N20, combined with CO2 sequestration, could result in a 4.82 million tonne reduction in CO2 emissions from 2021 to 2030, at a net cost of €20 million per year. This cost includes €147 million in possible efficiency savings and €167 million in gross costs. In the context of the expansion of the sector, efficiency measures may not yield absolute CO2 emission reductions, but they will minimise any rises. At a net cost of €58 million per year, an additional 1.37 million tonne CO2 emissions can be contributed by fossil fuel displacement via energy savings and the use of bioenergy [38].
The Climate Change Advisory Council has outlined that carbon tax will increase annually and intend to implement a carbon tax rate of at least €80 per tonne by 2030. According to recent estimates by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [73], CO2 emissions are expected to rise in most sectors in Ireland due to robust economic growth and the expansion of the agricultural sector. It is estimated that Ireland surpassed its compliance limits by 11.6 million tonne CO2 between 2013 and 2020. Purchases of carbon units resumed in November 2019 due to a government decision and a direction from the then Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment to solve the goals compliance gap. Since 2007, the Irish government has spent approximately €125 million euros on carbon credits [51,74]. In 2020, the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) purchased €1,117,466 Certified Emissions Reduction (CER’s) units. The fund earned additional carbon units from Ireland’s involvement in multilateral funds. The fund had €7,484,925 carbon credits as of the end of 2020 [51].
Figure 4 BoTG illustrates the estimated carbon sequestration from industrial hemp in Ireland. The minimum and maximum estimated total financial contribution of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 were between €348,805 and €1,534,742 carbon tax equivalent, based on the assumption that either 1 or 2 crops were cultivated annually from 2017 to 2021. In 2019, the minimum contribution concerning carbon tax was between €109,400 and €481,360. Due to the novelty of industrial hemp and licensing timelines, it is assumed one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated annually during this time.

5.3. Limitations

Sequestration occurs when the input of CO2 is greater than removals from harvesting and decomposition. The harvest of biomass may lead to a change in carbon stored above and below ground, and in general, these changes are not considered in the CO2 balance of bioenergy systems [31]. In the case of arable displacement, there will be a net increase in CO2 sequestration. Croplands have been shown to be net emitters of CO2 of between 1 to 3 tonnes CO2 per year [75]. Most of this carbon loss is assumed to be associated with both ploughing and extended fallow periods. Hemp cultivation in Ireland gives rise to annual CO2 emissions of almost 3 t CO2e, intermediate between Miscanthus and SRC (both approximately 2 t of CO2e per year) and sugar beet and OSR (both approximately 3.5 t CO2e per year, respectively) [23].
CO2 values absorbed by 1 hectare of hemp vary considerably according to the agronomic practices adopted and the biomass produced per hectare. CO2 sequestration potential is highly dependent on location, climate conditions and farming practices. Carbon storage in soils is hard to measure because its a slow process and also due to the variation in the use of fertilisers. The different combinations make the calculations complex, and methodological assumptions may lead to a wide range of results expressed on a per hectare basis [31]. The availability of land for the cultivation of biomass raw materials is the biggest weakness. High biomass yields are essential in achieving high CO2 emissions savings. The use of fertilisers can reduce this saving, an exact quantification of CO2 sequestration is not possible considering the number of variables involved. Therefore, uncertainties cannot be avoided [31]. It is unlikely that, from literature data alone, an accurate assessment of hemp’s ability to sequester Co2 can be made due to the different methods utilised and the cultivation environment. The annual carbon sequestration estimations for hemp in this study are based on a single and double crop per year, as hemp can be cultivated twice annually. It is assumed due to the novelty of this crop and licensing timeline that only one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated. The results are provided as a means of wide ranges which made it possible to draw insights into the potential environmental and economic historical benefits and possible emerging implications of cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland.
The research on hemp fertiliser requirements consistently suggests that phosphate and potassium should be applied at the time of planting, generally at a rate comparable to wheat output [76]. The difference is most important relative to potato and sugar beet, which can be characterised as high-input and high-impact crops. Despite significant differences among the crops concerning the impact values, only minor differences were found for the relative contribution of substances and resources to impacts and the relative contribution of processes to impacts. Hemp and sunflower are low-input crops concerning the use of fertilisers, pesticides, diesel, and agricultural machinery. Hemp, like corn, requires much nitrogen. There are few studies to show whether or not it grows well in poor soil [17]. The importance of the land use impact category will depend on the regional and national context [77]. Hemp is associated with higher annual costs than perennial energy crops due to annual soil preparation and seed purchase costs and higher fertiliser requirements [23].
When hemp is grown on a large scale, researchers have discovered that cultivation might be a pollutant that could negatively impact air quality. Studies show terpenes are a form of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The total environmental impact of hemp production varies depending on the local climate, the number of plants planted, and the strains developed. Ref. [32] measured monoterpenes in the air at Cannabis Cultivation Facilities (CCFs) in Denver, Colorado. They found total monoterpene mixing ratios were 4 to 8 times greater surrounding CCFs than at a background area. Due to differences in strains or life cycles, monoterpene composition analysis revealed regional diversity, implying that various clusters of CCFs may have different monoterpene emission patterns. In commercial buildings that are designed for rapid growth, actual emissions may be significantly greater. Many indoor grow houses utilise large carbon filtration systems to eliminate VOCs to lessen the impacts. This is more difficult in an outdoor grow environment, although ozone levels are less likely to surge in plant-rich areas that suit themselves to outdoor growing. There is little research conducted on the effects of cannabis production on air quality.
Hemp is a crop that requires a lot of water and nutrients to grow [78]. Illegal growing and inappropriate operations have the potential to pollute the water supply. Water pollution and diversion are caused by high water demand, which can have a severe impact on the ecology [79]. The demand for water will remain a key issue.
Cultivating industrial hemp can lead directly to soil erosion which negatively affects land use. However, it can also have the ability to absorb and store heavy metals from the soil [79]. Removing toxins from the soil has shown promise in small- scale testing in Italy and the United States. Willow, a perennial plant, could be more sustainable than an annual like hemp [80] because it can be planted once and then harvested for wood chips for 25 to 30 years without harming the soil. When a field is tilled or ploughed, carbon is released into the atmosphere [81]. Due to cannabis cultivation’s recent popularity, plant pathogens are becoming more prevalent and severe. This has led to a range of previously unknown diseases being reported. A diverse group of fungal, viral, bacterial, and nematode pathogens have been discovered to affect cannabis and hemp crops in North America in the past four years. It is common for producers who use biological control agents for the prevention of disease to encounter obstacles in the approval process for cannabis products [82].

5.4. Opportunities

Green growth is founded on ecomodernist thinking, which places its faith in scientific and technological advancement (e.g., eco-design, green innovation) aimed at achieving sustainability. In other words, “green growth” means “promoting economic growth and development while guaranteeing that natural resources and environmental services on which our well-being depends continue to be available” [83]. Customers are becoming more environmentally conscious and prepared to pay more for green services and products, which presents new challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurs around the world [84]. Commodity prices are the market mechanism through which the signal to generate additional farm output is conveyed to producers [85]. Ref. [86] examines a method involving attempts to alter the most widely used value criteria in the market by incorporating principles of worth based on a product’s environmental performance. Through market-mediation advocates, organisations suggest new criteria for product valuation and attempt to convince firms that consumer preferences are changing. If customers believe the agri-food sector does not contribute to national reduction targets, the clean green image of the farming sector emphasised in the Food Wise 2025 [14] then the agri-food sector development strategies could be harmed [87]. This is aside from the possibility of national penalties.
Recent research has shown that hemp can positively reduce agricultural greenhouse gases through its nitrogenous nutrition. Fertiliser application to agricultural land affects the nutrient balance of the soil. Emissions from fields vary depending on soil type, climate, crop, tillage method, and fertiliser and manure application rates [88]. In Ireland [89] research revealed that high yields of hemp might be achieved with comparatively little fertiliser inputs. The study indicated that hemp might be utilised as a low-input break crop if adequate markets exist. Their results also showed that hemp crops require little potassium [90]. According to [17], the dry matter of the stem (where 80 per cent of atmospheric carbon is stored) increases as the nitrogen balance of the soil changes, with nitrogen levels between 0 and 120 kg/ha having the potential to sequester up to 22 t of CO2 per hectare. When slow-release fertilisers like UREA are utilised instead of synthetic fertilisers like ammonium nitrate, hemp farming has a superior vegetative development and seed quality [18]. Ref. [23] used a nitrogen fertilisation rate for hemp ranged from 90 kg N/ha to 150 kg N/ha with a mid-point of 120 kg N/ha. An economic spreadsheet model, which utilised Microsoft Excel, was used to calculate CO2 abatement from hemp production in these areas for yields of 8 to 14 tons per hectare. They showed a yield range of 8 t to 14 t per hectare per year with a corresponding net CO2 abatement range between 8.7 t and 16.1 t of CO2e per hectare per year.
Reducing cultivation emissions through the use of organic fertilisers could further increase net CO2 abatement by up to 1.5 t CO2e per hectare per year. [91] researched the energy requirements and environmental impacts of Miscanthus production and processing in Ireland. They found that replacing synthetic fertilisers with bio solids reduced global warming potential by 23–33% but raised acidification and eutrophication potential by 290–400% and 258–300%, respectively. Nitrogen is a limiting factor in crop cultivation; however, the continuous use of inorganic Nitrogen has become a threat to soils and the environment. Ref. [92] recommends environmental approaches like organic manures, bio fertilisers and similar strategies to bind Nitrogen to help the cultivation of crops. These practices should be adopted for healthy and sustainable agriculture. Refs. [93,94] studied the advances in pyrolytic technologies with improved carbon capture and storage to combat climate change. They found that bio char can potentially deplete atmospheric carbon levels and enhance CO2 sequestration to help combat climate change. When integrated into food crop rotations, hemp does not have to compete with food sources and is an interesting choice for developing more sustainable non-transport bio energy supply chains. Hemp has fewer negative environmental effects than most other crops cultivated locally. Herbicides are not usually required because of hemp’s rapid growth when planted in the appropriate conditions. Decision-makers could regulate and promote hemp cultivation with specified geno types and soil conditions [95]. More research is required on heavy metals in plant-soil interactions [79].
Industrial hemp is a scalable crop that has the potential to improve both the economy and the environment [72]. The true valorisation of industrial hemp will hinge on significant innovation and the development of high-value applications [72]. The newest technological applications of hemp may be the most promising [96]. Stem material from hemp can be harvested in large quantities, at between 10 t and 14 t per hectare. Ref. [61]. Using no agro chemical input and with only minimal fertilisation, hemp produced a high biomass yield in Ireland (>10 t/ha). Hemp had a much lower gross margin than OSR and sugar beet but exceeded that of Miscanthus when organic fertiliser was used [23]. The carbon sequestration rate of fibre-based hemp crops can surpass both urban and forest tree plantations. However, the main solution in maintaining good quality and better yield of hemp is ‘crop rotation’ [97]. According to [61], biomass provides a long-term solution to Ireland’s energy needs while also addressing greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture sector. However, because these crops take three to five years to establish, urgent strategies are needed to encourage the widespread adoption of these systems. Ref. [41] recommend alternative energy resources, especially biomass, should be considered as a reliable and sustainable option. Refs. [93,98] studied the role of biotechnology in climate-resilient agriculture and highlighted some significant examples from the areas of genomics, genetic engineering and genome editing for developing sustainable agriculture in the face of climate change.
The development of regionally and commodity specialised industrial hemp breeds and processing capability, including complimentary processing infrastructure and other innovation in the U.S. market, has been stifled through strict regulations [96]. Based on the unique properties of hemp, prohibition has had an impact on a wide range of businesses, from those with primarily local economic relevance to worldwide sectors and products that we use every day [96]. To improve compliance, public safety, environmental outcomes, and rural development in hemp cultivation, policy efforts to reduce administrative burdens of compliance, such as streamlining permitting processes, extending agricultural support services, and supporting farmer collectives, deserve more attention [99]. Due to its physical and genetic similarities to its psychoactive-rich (>0.3 per cent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), extensive community outreach and education are required to eliminate the stigma associated with industrial hemp [72].

6. Conclusions

The environmental impact in this study is measured by using the number of hectares of land used to cultivate industrial hemp and multiplying it by either 10 tonnes (t), 15 t, or 22 t of CO2 sequestrated for each year from 2017 to 2021. The total amount of CO2 sequestrated between 2017 and 2021 is estimated between 14,660 t and 64,504 t of CO2. The minimum and maximum estimated total financial contributions were between €348,805 and €1,534,742 equivalent in a carbon tax, based on the assumption that either 1 or 2 crops was cultivated annually from 2017 to 2021. It is assumed based on the novelty of industrial hemp and the licensing timelines in Ireland that one crop of industrial hemp was cultivated annually in these years. When hemp is grown on a large scale, researchers discovered that cultivation might be a pollutant that could negatively impact air quality. Therefore, further reductions in CO2 emissions until 2050 will necessitate investment in research to create breakthrough mitigation approaches, as well as the establishment of integrated information transfer techniques and policies to encourage adoption or a fundamental transformation in Irish agriculture.
The results showed that in 2019, the total CO2 emissions from agriculture was 21,156.92 kilotonnes. There were 547 hectares of industrial hemp cultivated, which at its peak in the same year accounted for 0.0079% of total land use and 0.011% of total agricultural land use. Based on a sequestration rate of between 10 t and 22 t of CO2 industrial hemp had the potential to sequester between 5470 t and 24,068 t of CO2. this equates to a carbon tax equivalent of between €109,400 and €481,360 in Ireland for 2019. The total carbon tax equivalent from 2017 to 2021 could be an contribution of between €348,805 and €1,534,742 carbon tax equivalent.
Behaviour over Time Graphs (BoTGs) are created early in the planning stages of a research study, project, or programme to understand the situation at hand better. The time path of CO2 emissions is similar to cash flow. Under an investment, emissions tend to be higher before net emission reduction begins to accrue, and so entail a carbon payback period [100]. Further work will be needed to include this information in the emission inventory for CO2 emissions modelling [79]. Modelling work would also help ascertain future benefits and profits obtained from cultivating industrial hemp in Ireland. The BoTGs in this case study are an initial step to understanding this complex system and can be used as a strand in a multi-layered approach to understanding a potential solution to carbon sequestration efforts in Ireland. The BoTGs can be further used to engage diverse stakeholders in discussions in the form of Group Model Building workshops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.M.M.; Methodology, S.M.M.; Formal Analysis, S.M.M.; Investigation, S.M.M.; Resources, S.M.M.; Data Curation, S.M.M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.M.M.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.M.M.; Visualisation, S.M.M.; Supervision, A.R and P.W.; Project Administration, S.M.M.; Funding Acquisition, S.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by University of Limerick, Ireland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data for this study was obtained from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) on 12th May 2021 regarding the data from 2016 to 2020 and on 13th October 2021 regarding the data for 2021. The data set is available on request from the corresponding author and are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict to interest.

References

  1. World Commission on Environmental Development, Special Working Session. World commission on environment and development. Our Common. Future 1987, 17, 1–91. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodansky, D. The United Nations framework convention on climate change: A commentary. Yale J. Int’l L. 1993, 18, 451. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kyoto Protocol. United Nations framework convention on climate change. Kyoto Protoc. Kyoto 1997, 19, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Handl, G. Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. United Nations Audiov. Libr. Int. Law 2012, 11, 6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Desa, U.N. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Europe. 2030 Climate Target Plan. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/european-green-deal/2030-climate-target-planen (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  7. Hübler, M.; Löschel, A. The EU decarbonisation roadmap 2050—What way to walk? Energy Policy 2013, 55, 190–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. European Commission. European Union Adaption Strategy. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/adaptation/what_en (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  9. Environmental Protection Agency. Ireland’s Final Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990–2020. 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/Irelands-Final-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-report-1990-2020finalv1.1.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2022).
  10. The European Parliament And of the Council. Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2009. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009D0406 (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  11. The European Parliament And of the Council. Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2018. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32018R0842 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  12. Environmental and Protection and Agency. Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Projected 2019–2040. 2020. Available online: https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/2020-EPA-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-Projections_final.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2022).
  13. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Agriculture. 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.ie/our-services/monitoring–assessment/climate-change/ghg/agriculture/ (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  14. Philip Farrelly & Co Limited. Food, Wise, Assessment Strategic Environmental Assessment. 2015. Available online: file:///C:/Users/sinea/Downloads/10909926babf65-e7a5-48e9-bb96-887c4ebbf1ab.pdf (accessed on 27 February 2022).
  15. Government of Ireland. Ag Climatise National Climate & Air Roadmap for the Agriculture Sector/0. 2020. Available online: https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/a8823-publication-of-ag-climatise-national-climate-air-roadmap-for-the-agriculture-sector/ (accessed on 21 January 2022).
  16. Teagasc. Premier Irish Industrial Hemp Conference. 2019. Available online: https://www.teagasc.ie/news–events/news/2019/premier-irish-industrial-.php (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  17. Adesina, I.; Bhowmik, A.; Sharma, H.; Shahbazi, A. A review on the current state of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 2020, 10, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sorrentino, G. Introduction to emerging industrial applications of cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.). Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. E Nat. 2021, 32, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Melosini, M. La Canapa per Assorbire CO2 Atmosferica. Disponibile da. 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321129173_La_Canapa_per_Assorbire_CO2_Atmosferica (accessed on 12 January 2022).
  20. Australian Government, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Carbon Farming Initiative, Draft Methodology for Broad Acre Industrial Hemp Planting. 2011. Available online: https://ihempmichigan.com/wp-content/uploads/Industrial-Hemp-as-Carbon-Farming.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  21. James DeMello. Innovation and Global Marketplace Opportunities. 2019. Available online: https://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2019/Innovation-and-global-marketplace-opportunities.pdff (accessed on 12 January 2022).
  22. Vosper, J. The Role of Industrial Hemp in Carbon Farming; GoodEarth Resources PTY Ltd Australia: Sydne, NSW, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. Finnan, J.; Styles, D. Hemp: A more sustainable annual energy crop for climate and energy policy. Energy Policy 2013, 58, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salentijn, E.M.; Zhang, Q.; Amaducci, S.; Yang, M.; Trindade, L.M. New developments in fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) breeding. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 68, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deputy Jackie Cahill Questions to Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine. Greenhouse gas Emissions, Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday-13 May 2021. Available online: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2021-05-13/468/#pq-answers-468 (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  26. Citizens Information. Budget 2022. 2021. Available online: https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/money_and_tax/budgets/budget_2022.html (accessed on 3 January 2022).
  27. Forrester, J.W. System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1994, 10, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peter, S. The Fifth Discipline; The Art & Practice of Learning Organization. Doupleday Currence: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  29. Checkland, P. Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2000, 17, S11–S58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meadows, D.H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer; Chelsea Green Publishing: White River, VT, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cherubini, F.; Bird, N.D.; Cowie, A.; Jungmeier, G.; Schlamadinger, B.; Woess-Gallasch, S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2009, 53, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.T.; Ashworth, K.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Ortega, J.; Harley, P.C.; Rasool, Q.Z.; Vizuete, W. Ambient measurements of monoterpenes near Cannabis cultivation facilities in Denver, Colorado. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 232, 117510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greene, J.C. Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  34. Merriam, S.B. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aberdeen, T. Case study research: Design and methods. Book Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Can. J. Action Res. 2013, 14, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage: London, UK, 2009; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  37. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990–2020 Final Submission 2022, Submitted 15/03/2022. 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring-assessment/climate-change/air-emissions/greenhouse-gas-emissions-final-2020.php (accessed on 26 May 2022).
  38. Lanigan, G.; Donnellan, T.; Hanrahan, K.; Carsten, P.; Shalloo, L.; Krol, D.; Forrestal, P.J.; Farrelly, N.; O’Brien, D.; Ryan, M.; et al. An Analysis of Abatement Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Irish Agriculture 2021–2030; Technical Report; Teagasc: Dublin, Ireland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. European Union (EU). Units of Measurement in the EU 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/units-of-measurement-in-the-eu.html (accessed on 26 May 2022).
  40. Government of Ireland. Information on LULUCF Actions to Limit or Reduce Emissions and Maintain or Increase Removals from Activities Defined under Decision 529/2013/EU, Ireland 2020 Submission 2020. Available online: https://assets.gov.ie/129086/3dd0465c-6999-4ee5-a735-2fcef5385f26.pdf (accessed on 26 May 2022).
  41. Rehman, M.S.U.; Rashid, N.; Saif, A.; Mahmood, T.; Han, J.I. Potential of bioenergy production from industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa): Pakistan perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 18, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hemp Cooperative Ireland. Hemp Cooperative Ireland Presentation to Agricultural Committee. 2022. Available online: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/committee/dail/33/joint_committee_on_agriculture_food_and_the_marine/submissions/2022/2022-02-23_opening-statement-kate-carmody-chairperson-hemp-cooperative-ireland_en.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  43. Agriland. Hemp Can Sequester 15 t of Carbon per Hectare. 2020. Available online: https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/hemp-can-sequester-15 t-of-carbon-per-hectare/#::text=Hemp%20%E2%80%93%20a%20vegetable%20regulated%20as,Hemp%20Federation%20Ireland%20 (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  44. British Hemp Association (BHA). The Future for Hemp. 2022. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/respondents-additional-inputs/European%20Industrial%20Hemp%20Association%20 (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  45. Government of Ireland. The Sustainable Development Goals, National Implementation Plan 2018–2020. 2017. Available online: https://assets.gov.ie/19344/32f9bdd2aae2464caae37760edd1da04.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  46. COP26. UN Climate Change Conference 2021. 2021. Available online: https://ukcop26.org/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  47. Climate Change Advisory Council. Carbon Budget Technical Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.climatecouncil.ie/media/climatechangeadvisorycouncil/Technical%20report%20on%20carbon%20budgets%2025.10.2021.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  48. Government of Ireland. Climate Action Plan 2021 Securing Our Future. 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/6223e-climate-action-plan-2021/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  49. Government of Ireland. Government Publishes New Climate Law Which Commits Ireland to Net Zero Carbon Emissions by 2050. 2019. Available online: https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/aecb3-government-publishes-new-climate-law-which-commits-ireland-to-net-zero-carbon-emissions-by-2050 (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  50. Department of Communications Climate Action & Environment. National Mitigation Plan. 2017. Available online: https://www.rte.ie/documents/news/national-mitigation-plan-2017.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  51. National Treasury Management Agency. Carbon Fund Annual Report 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.ntma.ie/uploads/publication-articles/NTMA-Carbon-Fund-Report-2020.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  52. Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform. Agricultural Schemes, Dail Éireann Debate, Tuesday 15 June 2021. 2021. Available online: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2021-06-15/431/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  53. Government of Ireland. Program for Government Our Shared Future. 2020. Available online: https://www.rte.ie/documents/news/2020/06/programmeforgovernment-june2020-final.pdf1 (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  54. Government of Ireland. Interim Climate Actions. 2021. Available online: file:///C:/Users/sinea/Downloads/13666192c35cd6-e77d-4b81-8132-dac842b89339.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  55. Government of Ireland. Ireland’s CAP Strategic Plan 2023-2027—Public Consultation on Proposed Interventions. 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/cf1c0-irelands-cap-strategic-plan-2023-2027-public-consultation-on-proposed-interventions/ (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  56. Richards, K.; Hanrahan, K.; Shalloo, L.; Ryan, M.; Finnan, J.; Murphy, P.; Lanigan, G. The Challenge of Sustainability for Irish Agriculture. 2021. Available online: https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/handle/11019/2540?show=full (accessed on 16 January 2022).
  57. Government of Ireland. Climate Action Plan. 2019. Available online: https://assets.gov.ie/25419/c97cdecddf8c49ab976e773d4e11e515.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  58. Struik, P.; Amaducci, S.; Bullard, M.; Stutterheim, N.; Venturi, G.; Cromack, H. Agronomy of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Europe. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2000, 11, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sankari, H.S. Comparison of bast fibre yield and mechanical fibre properties of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2000, 11, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vantreese, V. Hemp Support: The European Union Experience. 2001, Volume 5. Available online: http://www.Uky.Edu/Ag/AgEcon/pubs/res_other/hemp0501. (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  61. Crowley, J.G. The Performance of Cannabis Sativa (HEMP) as a Fibre Source for Medium Density Fibre Board (MDF); Teagasc: Dublin, Ireland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  62. Karus, M.; Vogt, D. European hemp industry: Cultivation, processing and product lines. Euphytica 2004, 140, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schluttenhofer, C.; Yuan, L. Challenges towards revitalizing hemp: A multifaceted crop. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 917–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Office of the Attorney General. S.I. No 174/2017—Misuse of Drugs (Designation) Order 2017. 2017. Available online: https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2017/si/174/made/en/print (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  65. European Commission. Hemp Production Offers Broad Opportunities for Farmers, Industrial Sectors and Consumers in the European Union; The European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  66. Young, E.M. Revival of Industrial Hemp: A Systematic Analysis Of The Current Global Industry to Determine Limitations and Identify Future Potentials Within the Concept of Sustainability. Master’s Degree, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  67. Schippmann, U.; Leaman, D.J.; Cunningham, A. Impact of Cultivation and Gathering of Medicinal Plants on Biodiversity: Global Trends and Issues In Biodiversity and the Ecosystem Approach in Agriculture, Forestry And Fisheries; Satellite Event Session on the Occasion of the 9th Regular Session of the Commission on “Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture”, Rome, Italy, 12–13 October 2002; FAO Document Repository of United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vaverková, M.D.; Zloch, J.; Adamcová, D.; Radziemska, M.; Vyhnánek, T.; Trojan, V.; Winkler, J.; Đorđević, B.; Elbl, J.; Brtnickỳ, M. Landfill leachate effects on germination and seedling growth of hemp cultivars (Cannabis Sativa L.). Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rehman, M.; Fahad, S.; Du, G.; Cheng, X.; Yang, Y.; Tang, K.; Liu, L.; Liu, F.H.; Deng, G. Evaluation of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) as an industrial crop: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 52832–52843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fernando, A.L.; Duarte, M.P.; Almeida, J.; Boléo, S.; Mendes, B. Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in Europe. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2010, 4, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alcheikh, A. Advantages and Challenges of Hemp Biodiesel Production; Gavle University, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development: Gavle, Sweden, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pal, L.; Lucia, L.A. Renaissance of industrial hemp: A miracle crop for a multitude of products. BioResources 2019, 14, 2460–2464. [Google Scholar]
  73. Environmental Protection Agency. Annual Report and Accounts. 2019. Available online: https://www.epa.ie/publications/corporate/governance/EPA_AnnualReport_English_2019web.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  74. Minister Bruton Secures Government Approval to Develop All of Government Climate Plan. Purchase of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances and Renewable Credits to Recommence. 2018. Available online: https://merrionstreet.ie/en/news-room/releases/minister_bruton_secures_government_approval_to_develop_all_of_government_climate_plan.html (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  75. Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5687–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ranalli, P. Advances in Hemp Research; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dhondt, F.; Muthu, S.S. Hemp and Sustainability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  78. Carah, J.K.; Howard, J.K.; Thompson, S.E.; Short Gianotti, A.G.; Bauer, S.D.; Carlson, S.M.; Dralle, D.N.; Gabriel, M.W.; Hulette, L.L.; Johnson, B.J.; et al. High time for conservation: Adding the environment to the debate on marijuana liberalization. BioScience 2015, 65, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zheng, Z.; Fiddes, K.; Yang, L. A narrative review on environmental impacts of cannabis cultivation. J. Cannabis Res. 2021, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stack, G.M.; Toth, J.A.; Carlson, C.H.; Cala, A.R.; Marrero-González, M.I.; Wilk, R.L.; Gentner, D.R.; Crawford, J.L.; Philippe, G.; Rose, J.K.; et al. Evaluation of 30 High-Cannabinoid Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Cultivars in New York State; School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University: Geneva and Ithaca, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  81. Clifton-Brown, J.; Harfouche, A.; Casler, M.D.; Dylan Jones, H.; Macalpine, W.J.; Murphy-Bokern, D.; Smart, L.B.; Adler, A.; Ashman, C.; Awty-Carroll, D.; et al. Breeding progress and preparedness for mass-scale deployment of perennial lignocellulosic biomass crops switchgrass, miscanthus, willow and poplar. Gcb Bioenergy 2019, 11, 118–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Punja, Z.K. Emerging diseases of Cannabis sativa and sustainable management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 3857–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. OECD. What Is Green Growth and How Can it Help Deliver Sustainable Development? 2021. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/general/whatisgreengrowthandhowcanithelpdeliversustainabledevelopment.htm (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  84. Khan, E.A.; Royhan, P.; Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Mostafa, A. The impact of enviropreneurial orientation on small firms’ business performance: The mediation of green marketing mix and eco-labeling strategies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hertel, T.W.; Tyner, W.E. Market-mediated environmental impacts of biofuels. Glob. Food Secur. 2013, 2, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dubuisson-Quellier, S. A market mediation strategy: How social movements seek to change firms’ practices by promoting new principles of product valuation. Organ. Stud. 2013, 34, 683–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Donnellan, T.; Hanrahan, K.; Lanigan, G. Future Scenarios for Irish Agriculture: Implications for Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions, Report Teagasc Athenry. Available online: https://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2018/future-scenarios-for-irish-agriculture-implications-for-greenhouse-gas-and-ammonia-emissions.php (accessed on 15 January 2022).
  88. Larson, E.D. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2006, 10, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Finnan, J. Producing Biomass from Hemp (Cannabis sativa); Teagasc: Dublin, Ireland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  90. Finnan, J.; Burke, B. Potassium fertilization of hemp (Cannabis sativa). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 41, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Murphy, F.; Devlin, G.; McDonnell, K. Miscanthus production and processing in Ireland: An analysis of energy requirements and environmental impacts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Fahad, S.; Sönmez, O.; Saud, S.; Wang, D.; Wu, C.; Adnan, M.; Arif, M. Engineering Tolerance in Crop Plants Against Abiotic Stress; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  93. Fahad, S.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Alam, M.; Ullah, H.; Saeed, M.; Khan, I.A.; Adnan, M. Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  94. Al-Wabel, M.I.; Ahmad, M.; Usman, A.R.; Akanji, M.; Rafique, M.I. Advances in pyrolytic technologies with improved carbon capture and storage to combat climate change. In Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 535–575. [Google Scholar]
  95. Campiglia, E.; Gobbi, L.; Marucci, A.; Rapa, M.; Ruggieri, R.; Vinci, G. Hemp seed production: Environmental impacts of Cannabis sativa L. Agronomic practices by life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprint methodologies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Smith-Heisters, S. Illegally Green: Environmental Costs of Hemp Prohibition; Reason Foundation Los Angeles: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  97. Pervaiz, M.; Sain, M.M. Carbon storage potential in natural fiber composites. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2003, 39, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Munawar, S.; Mustafa, G.; Khan, M.S.; Joyia, F.A. Role of biotechnology in climate resilient agriculture. In Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 339–365. [Google Scholar]
  99. Bodwitch, H.; Polson, M.; Biber, E.; Hickey, G.M.; Butsic, V. Why comply? Farmer motivations and barriers in cannabis agriculture. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 86, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rajagopal, D.; Zilberman, D. On market-mediated emissions and regulations on life cycle emissions. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 90, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) historic carbon emissions from agriculture in Ireland 1990–2020 (final submission) 2022 [37].
Figure 1. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) historic carbon emissions from agriculture in Ireland 1990–2020 (final submission) 2022 [37].
Sustainability 14 04159 g001
Figure 2. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) historic and projected carbon tax from 2010 through to 2030.
Figure 2. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) historic and projected carbon tax from 2010 through to 2030.
Sustainability 14 04159 g002
Figure 3. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) illustrating the number of industrial hemp licenses issued in Ireland between 2016–2021, the number of industrial hemp licenses issued is shown in grey and the amount of hectares cultivated with industrial hemp is shown in green. Data was requested from the HPRA, and email correspondence was received on 12 May 2021 relating to the data from 2016 to 2020. A second email correspondence was received on 13 October 2021 regarding the data for 2021.
Figure 3. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) illustrating the number of industrial hemp licenses issued in Ireland between 2016–2021, the number of industrial hemp licenses issued is shown in grey and the amount of hectares cultivated with industrial hemp is shown in green. Data was requested from the HPRA, and email correspondence was received on 12 May 2021 relating to the data from 2016 to 2020. A second email correspondence was received on 13 October 2021 regarding the data for 2021.
Sustainability 14 04159 g003
Figure 4. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) estimated carbon sequestration from industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland at CO2 sequestration rates of 10 tonnes (t), 15 t and 22 t from 2017 to 2021.
Figure 4. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) estimated carbon sequestration from industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland at CO2 sequestration rates of 10 tonnes (t), 15 t and 22 t from 2017 to 2021.
Sustainability 14 04159 g004
Figure 5. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) estimated financial contribution for carbon emissions in terms of carbon tax credit in Euros.
Figure 5. Behaviour over Time Graph (BoTG) estimated financial contribution for carbon emissions in terms of carbon tax credit in Euros.
Sustainability 14 04159 g005
Table 1. Documentation required by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA).
Table 1. Documentation required by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA).
Item NoDocumentation
1Name and address of the potential applicant.
2Company registration documentation.
3Specific identification of the lands.
4Authorisation for the Gardaí no convictions recorded.
5Security arrangements for the crop.
6Specific details of the seed variety.
7Information on the suppliers of the seeds.
8Information on the end-use of the crop along with names of future customers.
Table 2. Industrial hemp cultivation estimated percentage (%) land use in Ireland 2019. Source: Total land use, agriculture and forestry land use obtained from land use change and forestry (LULUCF) [40] accessed 26 May 2022, which was used to inform the calculation percentage of the amount of industrial hemp cultivated in Ireland.
Table 2. Industrial hemp cultivation estimated percentage (%) land use in Ireland 2019. Source: Total land use, agriculture and forestry land use obtained from land use change and forestry (LULUCF) [40] accessed 26 May 2022, which was used to inform the calculation percentage of the amount of industrial hemp cultivated in Ireland.
Land UseHectares HaPercentage %
Total land6,900,000100
Agriculture4,900,00069
Forestry773,22911
Industrial hemp % of total land5470.0079
Industrial hemp % of agriculture5470.011
Table 3. Estimated environmental contribution of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 in terms of carbon emissions in tonnes (t).
Table 3. Estimated environmental contribution of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 in terms of carbon emissions in tonnes (t).
YearLand Use HaSgl Crop 10 t CO2Dbl Crop 10 t CO2Sgl Crop 15 t CO2Dbl Crop 15 t CO2Sgl Crop 22 t CO2Dbl Crop 22 t CO2
2016-------
20177676015201140228016723344
20182302300460034506900506010,120
2019547547010,940820516,41012,03424,068
202036236207240543010,860796415,928
20212512510502037657530552211,044
Contribution 14,660 t29,320 t21,990 t43,980 t32,252 t64,504 t
Table 4. Estimated economic contribution of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 in terms of carbon tax (Euros).
Table 4. Estimated economic contribution of industrial hemp cultivation in Ireland from 2017 to 2021 in terms of carbon tax (Euros).
YearLand Use HaCarbon Tax €Sgl Crop 10 t €Dbl Crop 10 t €Sgl Crop 15 t €Dbl Crop 15 t €Sgl Crop 22 t €Dbl Crop 22 t €
2016--------
2017762015,20030,40022,80045,60033,44066,880
20182302046,00092,00069,000138,000101,200202,400
201954720109,400218,800164,100328,200240,360481,360
20203622694,120188,240141,180282,360207,064414,128
202125133.584,085168,170126,127.5252,255184,974369,974
Contribution €348,805€697,610€523,207.5€1,046,415€767,371€1,534,742
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Madden, S.M.; Ryan, A.; Walsh, P. A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074159

AMA Style

Madden SM, Ryan A, Walsh P. A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Madden, Sinéad M., Alan Ryan, and Patrick Walsh. 2022. "A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074159

APA Style

Madden, S. M., Ryan, A., & Walsh, P. (2022). A Systems Thinking Approach Investigating the Estimated Environmental and Economic Benefits and Limitations of Industrial Hemp Cultivation in Ireland from 2017–2021. Sustainability, 14(7), 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop