Improving Entrepreneurs’ Digital Skills and Firms’ Digital Competencies through Business Apps Training: A Study of Small Firms
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
3. Recruitment of Firms, Data Collection, and Training Context
3.1. Recruitment of Firms and Data Collection
3.2. Business Apps Training Context
4. Identifying and Screening Apps
5. Business Apps Operations
6. Variables and Scales
7. Descriptive Statistics
8. Estimates
8.1. Hypotheses Testing
8.2. Missing Values
8.3. Business Apps Training and Firms’ Digital Competencies Per Category
8.4. Business Apps Aided by AI and Firms’ Digital Competencies
9. Discussion and Implications
10. Limitations and Future Research
11. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Categories of Business Apps | Number of Interactions to Complete Tasks * | Visibility of System Status and Losability/ Findability of the Device ** | Match Between System and the Real World ** | Consistency and Mapping ** | Good Ergonomics and Minimalist Design ** | Ease of Input, Screen Readability and Glancability ** | Flexibility, Efficiency of Use and Personalization ** | Aesthetic, Privacy and Social Conventions ** | Realistic Error Management ** |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panel I. Communication | |||||||||
App 1 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 2 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 3 | 4 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
Panel II. Networking | |||||||||
App 1 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 2 | 5 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 3 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) |
Panel III. Social Media | |||||||||
App 1 | 5 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 2 | 5 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2.5 (0.71) | 2 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 3 | 6 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) |
Panel IV. Customer Relationship Management | |||||||||
App 1 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 2 | 5 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 3 | 4.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (1.41) |
Panel V. Payments | |||||||||
App 1 | 7.5 (0.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
App 2 | 7.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) |
App 3 | 8 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
Panel VI. Accounting and Finance | |||||||||
App 1 | 7 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 2.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 2 | 8 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 2 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
App 3 | 7.5 (0.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (1.41) |
Panel VII. Managing Inventory | |||||||||
App 1 | 8 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
App 2 | 8 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) |
App 3 | 7.5 (0.7) | 2 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
Panel VIII. Team and Time Management | |||||||||
App 1 | 8.5 (0.7) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) |
App 2 | 8.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) |
App 3 | 7.5 (0.7) | 2 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) |
Panel IX. Project Management | |||||||||
App 1 | 8 (1.41) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) |
App 2 | 7.5 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 2 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 2 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
App 3 | 8 (1.41) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1.5 (0.71) | 1 (0.0) | 1.5 (0.71) |
Appendix B
Communication | Communication | Networking | Networking | Social Media | Social Media | Customer Relationship Management | Customer Relationship Management | Payments | Payments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | Model V | Model VI | Model VII | Model VIII | Model IX | Model X | |
Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | |
Business Apps Training ^ | 0.838 (0.188) *** | 0.878 (0.175) *** | 0.823 (0.180) *** | 0.780 (0.173) *** | 0.708 (0.165) *** | 0.682 (0.158) *** | 0.927 (0.180) *** | 0.902 (0.171) *** | 0.777 (0.215) *** | 0.731 (0.210) *** |
Wald test [prob > chi2] | 66.05 [0.000] | - | 55.53 [0.000] | - | 73.79 [0.000] | - | 66.61 [0.000] | - | 58.38 [0.000] | - |
F [prob > F] | - | 24.90 [0.000] | - | 20.22 [0.000] | - | 18.57 [0.000] | - | 27.84 [0.000] | - | 12.09 [0.000] |
Appendix C
Accounting and Finance | Accounting and Finance | Managing Inventory | Managing Inventory | Team and Time Management | Team and Time Management | Project Management | Project Management | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | Model V | Model VI | Model VII | Model VIII | |
Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | |
Business Apps Training ^ | 0.753 (0.180) *** | 0.707 (0.169) *** | 0.186 (0.204) | 0.219 (0.196) | 0.249 (0.230) | 0.268 (0.219) | 0.588 (0.202) *** | 0.658 (0.197) *** |
Wald test [prob > chi2] | 43.54 [0.000] | - | 56.29 [0.000] | - | 49.32 [0.000] | - | 101.37 [0.000] | - |
F [prob > F] | - | 17.51 [0.000] | - | 1.24 [0.270] | - | 1.50 [0.220] | - | 11.16 [0.000] |
References
- ITU. Digital Skills Insights; International Telecommunication Union: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-92-61-35061-1. [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald, M.; Kruschwitz, N.; Bonnet, D.; Welch, M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2013. Available online: https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/embracing_digital_technology_a_new_strategic_imperative.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Azevedo, A.; Almeida, A.H. Grasp the challenge of digital transition in SMEs—A training course geared towards decision-makers. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vial, G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019, 28, 118–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ala-Mutka, K. Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding; Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: Seville, Spain, 2011. Available online: http://www.kmu-digital.eu/de/publikationen/tags/prozesse-strukturen/286-mapping-digital-competence-towards-a-conceptual-understanding/file (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Torres-Coronas, T.; Vidal-Blasco, M.A. Adapting a face-to-face competence framework for digital competence assessment. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 2011, 7, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferrari, A.; Punie, Y.; Redecker, C. Understanding digital competence in the 21st century: An analysis of current frameworks. In EC-TEL: 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills; Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 7563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamburg, I. Facilitating lifelong learning in SMEs towards SDG4. Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 2020, 7, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberländer, M.; Beinicke, A.; Bipp, T. Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Comput. Educ. 2020, 146, 103752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horváth, D.; Szabó, R.Z. Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehner, F.; Sundby, M.W. ICT skills and competencies for SMEs: Results from a structured literature analysis on the individual level. In The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace, Professional and Practice-Based Learning; Harteis, C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 21, pp. 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S.C.; Shainesh, G. Bridging the service divide through digitally enabled service innovations: Evidence from Indian healthcare service providers. MIS Q. 2015, 39, 245–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulas, D. Digital transformation process and SMEs. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 158, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Su, F.; Zhang, W.; Mao, J.-Y. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Inf. Syst. J. 2017, 28, 1129–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, J.; Amorim, M.; Melão, N.; Matos, P. Digital transformation: A literature review and guidelines for future research. In WorldCIST’18 2018: Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 745, pp. 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casula, M.; Rangarajan, N.; Shields, P. The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research. Qual. Quant. 2021, 55, 1703–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackburn, R.; Athayde, R. Making the connection: The effectiveness of Internet training in small businesses. Educ. Train. 2000, 42, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Casalino, N.; Ciarlo, M.; De Marco, M.; Gatti, M. ICT adoption and organizational change. An innovative training system on industrial automation systems for enhancing competitiveness of SMEs. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS-2012), Wrocław, Poland, 28 June–1 July 2012; pp. 283–288. [Google Scholar]
- Drydakis, N. Artificial Intelligence and reduced SMEs’ business risks. A dynamic capabilities analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarvimaki, M.; Hämäläinen, K. Integrating immigrants: The impact of restructuring. Active labor market programs. J. Labor Econ. 2016, 34, 479–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. A Lifeline to Learning: Leveraging Mobile Technology to Support Education for Refugees; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2018. Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002612/261278e.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Marchand, K.; Dijkhuizen, J. Entrepreneurship as a tool for a new beginning. Entrepreneurship training for refuges in a new homeland. Contemp. Issues Entrep. Res. 2018, 8, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide; OECD: Paris, France, 2018. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Chan, Y.E.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Desjardins, C. Technology-driven innovation in small firms. MIS Q. Exec. 2020, 19, 39–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy; OECD: Paris, France, 2017. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/industry/C-MIN-2017-8-EN.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Lofstrom, M.; Wang, C. Immigrants and entrepreneurship. IZA World Labor 2019, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatziprokopiou, P.; Frangopoulos, Y. Migrant economies and everyday spaces in Athens in times of crisis. City 2016, 20, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drydakis, N. The effect of ethnic identity on the employment of immigrants. Rev. Econ. Househ. 2013, 11, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Andreß, H.J.; Golsch, K.; Schmidt, A.W. Applied Panel Data Analysis for Economic and Social Surveys; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; ISBN 978-3-642-32914-2. [Google Scholar]
- Kreiser, P.M.; Marino, L.D.; Kuratko, D.F.; Weaver, K.M. Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: The non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Bus. Econ. 2013, 40, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giotopoulos, I.; Kontolaimou, A.; Korra, E.; Tsakanikas, A. What drives ICT adoption by SMEs? Evidence from a large-scale survey in Greece. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 81, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Skills for SMEs; European Commission: Brussel, Belgium, 2019. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/el/publication-detail/-/publication/82aa7f66-67fd-11ea-b735-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Hamal, S.; Senvar, O. Effectiveness of machine learning classifiers in detecting financial accounting fraud for Turkish SMEs. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2021, 14, 769–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basri, W. Examining the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted social media marketing on the performance of small and medium enterprises: Toward effective business management in the Saudi Arabian context. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2021, 13, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez, P.; De-La-Cruz, F.; Guerrón, X.; Conrado, G.; Quiroz-Palma, P.; Molina, W. ChatPy: Conversational agent for SMEs. In Proceedings of the 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Coimbra, Portugal, 19–22 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Kalse, A. Usage and adoption of Artificial Intelligence in SMEs. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watney, C.; Auer, D. Encouraging AI Adoption by EU SMES; Progressive Policy Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. Available online: https://progressivepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PPI_Encouraging-AI-adoption-by-EU-SMEs-3.24.21-2.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Hansen, E.B.; Bøgh, S. Artificial Intelligence and Internet of things in small and medium sized enterprises: A survey. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieru, D. Towards a multi-dimensional model of digital competence in small- and medium-sized enterprises. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, 3rd ed.; Khosrow-Pour, M., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 6715–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davenport, T.H.; Guha, A.; Grewal, D.; Bressgott, T. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 24–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sood, N. The power of AI to transform the global SME credit landscape. In The AI Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Fintech Visionaries; Chishti, S., Bartoletti, I., Leslie, A., Millie, S.M., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 52–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drydakis, N. Mobile apps aiming to facilitate immigrants’ societal integration and overall level of integration, health and mental health. Does artificial intelligence enhance outcomes? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 117, 106661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paidousi, C.; Efstratoglou, A. Digital Inclusion and Human Capital in Greece; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: Athens, Greece, 2020. Available online: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/athen/16897.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2022).
- Drydakis, N. Adverse working conditions and immigrants’ physical health and depression outcomes: A longitudinal study in Greece. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2022, 95, 539–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drydakis, N. Ethnic identity and immigrants’ wages in Greece. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2012, 36, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, C.; Flood, D.; Harrison, R. A protocol for evaluating mobile apps. In Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts: Approaches and Methodologies; Pedro, I., Nunes, M.B., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 398–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Card, S.K.; Moran, T.P.; Allen, N. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Commun. ACM 1980, 23, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertini, E.; Catarci, T.; Dix, A.; Gabrielli, S.; Kimani, S.; Santucci, G. Appropriating heuristic evaluation for mobile computing. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2009, 1, 20–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1994; ISBN 0125184069. [Google Scholar]
- Rosen, L.D.; Whaling, K.; Carrier, L.M.; Cheever, N.A.; Rokkum, J. The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, 2501–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McGuirk, H.; Lenihan, H.; Hart, M. Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate. Res. Policy 2015, 44, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Deursen, A.J.A.M.; Helsper, E.J.; Eynon, R. Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Inf. Commun. Soc. 2016, 19, 804–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constant, A.F.; Gataullin, L.; Zimmermann, K.F. Ethnosizing immigrants. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2009, 69, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cortina, J.M. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and apps. J. Appl. Psychol. 1993, 78, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, S.L. Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; ISBN 9789400760943. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, A.; Fairbrother, M.; Jones, K. Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Qual. Quant. 2019, 53, 1051–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clarke, K.A. The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 2005, 22, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wooldridge, J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780262232586. [Google Scholar]
- Al Suwaidi, F.; Alshurideh, M.; Al Kurdi, B.; Salloum, S.A. The impact of innovation management in SMEs performance: A systematic review. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2020, Cairo, Egypt, 19–21 October 2020; Hassanien, A.E., Slowik, A., Snášel, V., El-Deeb, H., Tolba, F.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 1261, p. 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canhoto, A.; Clear, F. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential. Bus. Horiz. 2020, 63, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, P.; Frank, V.; Kratt, M. Adoption of Artificial Intelligence technologies in German SMEs—Results from an empirical study. In Corporate Governance: A Search for Emerging Trends in the Pandemic Times, Proceedings of the PACIS 2021, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 12–14 July 2021; PACIS: Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2021; Volume 189, p. 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, T.; Martins, M.F. Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2010, 110, 1337–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, T.; Martins, M.F. Literature review of information technology. Adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 2011, 14, 110–121. [Google Scholar]
Mean | Standard Deviation | |
---|---|---|
Entrepreneurs’ Age (c.) | 34.79 | 6.83 |
Entrepreneurs’ Gender: Male (%) | 83.33 | 0.37 |
Entrepreneurs’ Higher Education (%) | 12.5 | 0.33 |
Entrepreneurs’ Years of Migration in Greece (c.) | 9.64 | 2.21 |
Entrepreneurs’ Continent of Origin: Europe (%) | 22.91 | 0.42 |
Entrepreneurs’ Continent of Origin: Africa (%) | 47.91 | 0.50 |
Entrepreneurs’ Continent of Origin: Asia (%) | 29.16 | 0.45 |
Firms’ Years of Operation (c.) | 4.14 | 1.55 |
Firms’ Number of Employees (c.) | 3.56 | 2.78 |
Ownership of the Firms’ Premise (%) | 4.16 | 0.20 |
Firms’ Sector: Trade (%) | 47.91 | 0.50 |
Firms’ Sector: Services (%) | 25.0 | 0.43 |
Firms’ Sector: Hospitality (%) | 27.08 | 0.44 |
Scales | Alpha Coefficients | Number of Items per Scale | Observations |
---|---|---|---|
Positive Attitudes Toward Technology scale | 0.59 | 6 | 89 |
Willingness to Change (Technology/Skills/Operations) scale | 0.53 | 3 | 89 |
Internet Skills scale | 0.86 | 35 | 89 |
Business Apps in Use scale | 0.67 | 9 | 89 |
Digital Competencies scale | 0.79 | 9 | 89 |
Integration (Ethnosizer) scale | 0.52 | 5 | 89 |
Scales | Panel I before the Business Apps Training | Panel II after the Business Apps Training | t-Test |
---|---|---|---|
Positive Attitudes Toward Technology scale (c.) | 2.51 (0.49) | 2.75 (0.52) | −2.21 ** |
Willingness to Change (Technology/Skills/Operations) scale (c.) | 2.69 (0.66) | 3.02 (0.70) | −2.26 ** |
Internet Skills scale (c.) | 2.05 (0.30) | 2.35 (0.41) | −3.98 *** |
Business Apps in Use scale (c.) | 1.20 (0.78) | 1.68 (0.79) | −2.82 *** |
Digital Competencies scale (c.) | 1.38 (0.51) | 2.03 (0.70) | −4.96 *** |
Integration scale (Ethnosizer) (c.) | 2.10 (0.43) | 2.49 (0.55) | −3.70 *** |
Observations | 48 | 41 |
Categories | Panel I before the Business Apps Training | Panel II after the Business Apps Training | t-Test |
---|---|---|---|
Communication (c.) | 1.20 (0.14) | 2.00 (0.18) | −3.40 *** |
Networking (c.) | 1.04 (0.10) | 1.87 (0.14) | −4.64 *** |
Social Media (c.) | 1.27 (0.11) | 1.95 (0.16) | −3.43 *** |
Customer Relationship Management (c.) | 0.95 (0.11) | 1.92 (0.16) | −4.85 *** |
Payments (c.) | 1.33 (0.15) | 2.09 (0.16) | −3.34 *** |
Accounting and Finance (c.) | 1.16 (0.13) | 1.95 (0.18) | −3.57 ** |
Managing Inventory (c.) | 2.20 (0.19) | 2.39 (0.18) | −0.65 |
Team and Time Management (c.) | 1.95 (0.19) | 2.21 (0.16) | −1.00 |
Project Management (c.) | 1.35 (0.14) | 1.87 (0.16) | −2.45 ** |
Observations | 48 | 41 |
Scales | Business Apps Training | |
---|---|---|
Correlations | p-Values | |
Positive Attitudes Toward Technology scale | 0.23 | 0.02 ** |
Willingness to Change (Technology/Skills/Operations) scale | 0.23 | 0.02 ** |
Internet Skills Scale | 0.38 | 0.00 *** |
Business Apps in Use scale | 0.27 | 0.00 *** |
Digital Competencies scale | 0.46 | 0.00 *** |
Integration (Ethnosizer) scale | 0.36 | 0.00 *** |
Positive Attitudes toward Technology | Willingness to Change (Technology Skills/Operations) | Internet/Digital Skills | Business Apps in Use | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | Model V | Model VI | Model VII | Model VIII | |
Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | |
Business Apps Training ^ | 0.267 (0.031) *** | 0.272 (0.029) *** | 0.361 (0.075) *** | 0.365 (0.071) *** | 0.332 (0.037) *** | 0.339 (0.034) *** | 0.486 (0.072) *** | 0.493 (0.067) *** |
Wald test [prob > chi2] | 310.30 [0.000] | - | 88.81 [0.000] | - | 182.87 [0.000] | - | 154.23 [0.000] | - |
F [prob > F] | - | 84.36 [0.000] | - | 25.93 [0.000] | - | 96.69 [0.000] | - | 53.08 [0.000] |
Digital Competencies | Integration (Ethnosizer) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model I | Model II | Model III | Model IV | |
Random Effects | Fixed Effects | Random Effects | Fixed Effects | |
Business Apps Training ^ | 0.650 (0.115) *** | 0.647 (0.108) *** | 0.402 (0.048) *** | 0.404 (0.045) *** |
Wald test [prob > chi2] | 97.12 [0.000] | - | 187.03 [0.000] | - |
F [prob > F] | - | 37.73 [0.000] | - | 80.37 [0.000] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Drydakis, N. Improving Entrepreneurs’ Digital Skills and Firms’ Digital Competencies through Business Apps Training: A Study of Small Firms. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084417
Drydakis N. Improving Entrepreneurs’ Digital Skills and Firms’ Digital Competencies through Business Apps Training: A Study of Small Firms. Sustainability. 2022; 14(8):4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084417
Chicago/Turabian StyleDrydakis, Nick. 2022. "Improving Entrepreneurs’ Digital Skills and Firms’ Digital Competencies through Business Apps Training: A Study of Small Firms" Sustainability 14, no. 8: 4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084417
APA StyleDrydakis, N. (2022). Improving Entrepreneurs’ Digital Skills and Firms’ Digital Competencies through Business Apps Training: A Study of Small Firms. Sustainability, 14(8), 4417. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084417