Accessibility and Economic Connections between Cities of the New Western Land–Sea Corridor in China—Enlightenments to the Passageway Strategy of Gansu Province
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Area
2.2. Research Methods
2.2.1. Grid Accessibility
2.2.2. Urban Flow Intensity
2.3. Data Sources
3. Results of Accessibility
3.1. The Spatial Layout of the Urban Accessibility of the NWLSC
- 1.
- There is a clear trend of strong south and weak north. As shown in Figure 3, accessibility presents significant spatial heterogeneity. The accessibility level in the south is significantly higher than that in the north, and the degree of accessibility is gradually decreasing from south to north, and from east to west. The four coastal ports, which are Beihai, Qinzhou, Fangchenggang and Yangpu Port, are in a core, and there is strong interoperability. On the other hand, the urban agglomerations of Chengdu-Chongqing, Lanzhou-Xining, Central-Guizhou, Guanzhong-Plain and other urban agglomerations are also relatively accessible. However, most areas in Qinghai and Xinjiang have weak accessibility and poor resource circulation. In addition, the longest time distance from the grid to the node cities was reduced from 9.388 h in 2015 to 8.413 in 2017 and then increased to 8.919 in 2019. This was affected by the diminishing marginal effect of infrastructure construction; regional accessibility cannot increase indefinitely with the construction of the road network [38].
- 2.
- The accessibility space layout is “corridor style”. Due to the level of infrastructure, construction is the decisive factor for accessibility. It can be found that the nodes with high accessibility are in a corridor layout and basically coincide with various railway lines or high-speed routes. For example, the Lanzhou–Hexi Corridor–Urumqi route is highly accessible, which coincides with the Lanxin railway; the Lanzhou-Chongqing–Zunyi–Guiyang–Nanning–Fangchenggang–Qinzhou–Beihai corridor is basically consistent with the Lanhai highway.
- 3.
- Accessibility is positively correlated with economic level and the city’s scale, but negatively correlated with the distance between cities. It can be observed in Figure 4 that the accessibility rankings of the 16 node cities have not changed in the past five years; they have maintained the status quo, which is Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration leading, Beibu Gulf in the middle, and northwestern lagging behind. Accessibility is positively correlated with urban economic level and urban population; in a sense, the agglomeration force and radiation ability of a city are affected by the level of accessibility. Therefore, cities with strong accessibility are also high-level development cities such as Chongqing and Chengdu. Nevertheless, affected by distance decay effects, the distance between cities in the northwest region is relatively long; meanwhile, the cities in the southwest region have strong agglomeration, especially Fangchenggang, Qinzhou, Beihai, and Yangpu, whose accessibility rankings all surpass the five northwestern capital cities. In addition, because Lanzhou is in the middle of the northwest region, its accessibility ranking is the highest in the northwest.
- 4.
- The agglomeration features are significant. It can be observed in Figure 5 that, as with the ranking, which is affected by the diminishing marginal effect of infrastructure construction [38], the layout of the studied regional accessibility has hardly changed in five years. Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan and the other regions form high-access areas; Gansu, Shaanxi, open-door Guangxi, and Hainan form medium-access areas; Ningxia, Qinghai on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, and sparsely populated Xinjiang are low-access areas. The high-reaching zones gather in an “R” shape in southwestern China. It is worth mentioning that as the infrastructure becomes more and more perfect, its grids become increasingly dense, and the high-reach area also shows stronger agglomeration characteristics.
3.2. How to Develop the Strategic Passageway of Gansu Province—Southbound Passageway
4. Results of Location Entropy and Urban Flow Intensity
4.1. Location Entropy
4.2. Urban Flow Intensity
4.3. How to Develop the Strategic Passageway of Gansu Province—“Golden Passageway”
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Guo, Q. The Interactive Relationships between the Tourism-Transportation-Ecological Environment System of Provinces along the ‘Silk Road Economic Belt’in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3050. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, W.G. How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1959, 25, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez, J.; González, R.; Gomez, G. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. J. Transp. Geogr. 1996, 4, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez, J.; Condeço-Melhorado, A.; Martín, J.C. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. J. Transp. Geogr. 2010, 18, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrezd, J. Economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. J. Transp. Geogr. 2001, 9, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Jin, F.; Mo, H.; Wang, F. Spatiotemporal evolution of China’s railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2009, 43, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.L.; Fang, Z.; Lu, S.; Tao, R. Impacts of high speed rail on railroad network accessibility in China. J. Transp. Geo. 2014, 40, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, A.; Thompson, E. Does public infrastructure affect economic activity? Evidence from the rural interstate highway system. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2000, 30, 457–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Kelly, M.E. A geographer’s analysis of hub-and-spoke networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 1998, 6, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Englmann, F.; Grützmann, K.; Haag, G.; Nijkamp, P.; Popkov, Y.S.; Reggiani, A.; Weidlich, W. An Integrated Model of Transport and Urban Evolution: With an Application to a Metropole of an Emerging Nation; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Nanchen, C.; Pingyu, Z. Transnational urban economic connection based on railway accessibility—taking Sino-Russian K19/K20 class train as an example. Econ. Geogr. 2018, 38, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Xu, J.; Zhu, C.; Qi, Y.; Xu, L. The county accessibility divisions in China and its correlation with population distribution. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2010, 65, 416–426. [Google Scholar]
- Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, P.J.; Catalano, G.; Walker, D.R. Exploratory analysis of the world city network. Urban Stud. 2002, 39, 2377–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, P.J.; Derudder, B.; Hoyler, M.; Ni, P. New regional geographies of the world as practised by leading advanced producer service firms in 2010. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 2013, 38, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, P.J.; Csomós, G. Cities as control and command centres: Analysis and interpretation. Cities 2012, 29, 408–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orozco Pereira, R.A.; Derudder, B. Determinants of dynamics in the world city network, 2000–2004. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 1949–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigler, T.J.; Martinus, K. Extending beyond ‘world cities’ in World City Network (WCN) research: Urban positionality and economic linkages through the Australia-based corporate network. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2017, 49, 2916–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Lin, A. The research of the middle reaches of the Yangtze river’s spatial contact-based on the Gravity model and the urban flow. Mod. Urban Res. 2016, 1, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, C.; Pang, H. Study on spatial relations of Chinese urban system: Gravity model approach. Geogr. Res. 2008, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Zong, H.; Du, Y.; Huang, Y. Accessibility and Spatial Linkage of Cities between Southwest China and SEA Countries Based on Land Transportation. Econ. Geogr. 2020, 40, 90–98. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, X.S.; Li, T.; Yang, W.Y.; Huang, X.; Yin, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. Accessibility and urban spatial connections of cities in the Silk Road Economic Belt based on land transportation. Prog. Geogr. 2015, 34, 657–664. [Google Scholar]
- De Soyres, F.; Mulabdic, A.; Murray, S.; Rocha, N.; Ruta, M. How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs? Int. Econ. 2019, 159, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iqbal, B.A.; Rahman, M.N.; Sami, S. Impact of Belt and Road Initiative on Asian Economies. Glob. J. Emerg. Mark. Econ. 2019, 11, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bird, J.; Lebrand, M.; Venables, A.J. The belt and road initiative: Reshaping economic geography in central Asia? J. Dev. Econ. 2020, 144, 102441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, V.; Haldar, S. Emerging Contours of Contemporary Asian Maritime Connectivity: Economic and Strategic Objectives. India Q. 2020, 76, 461–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulis, A.; Kabiraj, S.; Siddik, M.N.A. Economic Cooperation Between Latvia and China on the Background of Belt and Road Initiative with Focus on Cargo Potential. FIIB Bus. Rev. 2018, 7, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toumert, M.A. The Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative in Boosting Local Business through Asia and Africa Satisfaction: A Study of Kenya-China Business Projects. Open J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 9, 1714–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W. Evaluation of Logistics Competitiveness of Provinces and Cities along the New Western Land–Sea Corridor based on Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method. J. Manag. Decis. Sci. 2020, 3, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Y.; Qiao, G.; Lu, J. Impacts of the new international land–sea trade corridor on the freight transport structure in China, central Asia, the ASEAN countries and the EU. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2020, 35, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jijian, G.; Lipeng, F.; Liyan, H.; Heng, Z. Estimation of the Impact of the New International Land and Sea Trade Channel on the Development of the Trade Potential of 8 Domestic Provinces and Cities. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 214, 03024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, M. GMS economic cooperation and its impact on CLMV development. In Development Strategy for CLMV in the Age of Economic Integration; ERIA Research Project Report; E-JETRO: Chiba, Japan, 2007; Chapter 4. [Google Scholar]
- Ishida, M.; Isono, I. Old, new and potential economic corridors in the Mekong region (No. 8). In Emerging Economic Corridors in the Mekong Region; BRC Research Report; IDE-JETRO: Bangkok, Thailand, 2012; Chapter 1. [Google Scholar]
- Ishida, M. Inland ASEAN road connectivity: Challenges and prospects. In Cross-Border Transport Facilitation in Inland ASEAN and the ASEAN Economic Community; ERIA and IDE-JETR: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019; Chapter 1; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ishida, M. GMS economic corridors under the Belt and Road Initiative. J. Asian Econ. Integr. 2019, 1, 183–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Dong, Q. The spatial difference and impact effect of urban innovation at the new Western Land–Sea corridor. J. Chongqing Univ. Technol. (Soc. Sci.) 2021, 35, 58–67. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W. Identifying the spatial scope of megaregions in China from the perspective of accessibility. Geogr. Res. 2020, 39, 2808–2820. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, D.; Li, X.; Fan, X. Evolution of spatial pattern of traffic accessibility under the expressway construction in central plain economic region. Areal Res. Dev. 2016, 35, 36–40. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, R.; Tai, H.; Cheng, K.T.; Cao, Z.; Dong, H.; Hou, J. Analysis on Evolution Characteristics and Dynamic Mechanism of Urban Green Innovation Network: A Case Study of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Sustainability 2021, 14, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Road Grade | Railway | Highway | National Highway | Provincial Road | County Road | Country Road |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed (km/h) | 90 | 100 | 80 | 60 | 40 | 20 |
Time Costs (sec) | 40 | 36 | 45 | 60 | 90 | 180 |
City | Order Number | Nanning | Liuzhou | Beihai | Fangchenggang | Qinzhou | Danzhou (Yangpu) | Chongqing | Chengdu | Guiyang | Zunyi | Kunming | Xi’an | Lanzhou | Xining | Yinchuan | Urumqi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 1 | 0.694 | 1.366 | 1.404 | 0.312 | 0.811 | 0.281 | 1.109 | 1.048 | 0.808 | 0.939 | 0.756 | 1.187 | 0.854 | 0.995 | 0.559 | 0.588 |
2 | 1.227 | 1.591 | 0.561 | 1.189 | 1.431 | 0.292 | 1.066 | 0.824 | 1.582 | 0.475 | 1.335 | 0.788 | 1.298 | 0.931 | 0.347 | 0.832 | |
3 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.193 | 0.148 | 0.237 | 0.808 | 1.045 | 1.552 | 0.437 | 0.421 | 0.711 | 0.534 | 0.369 | 0.445 | 2.58 | 0.387 | |
4 | 0.892 | 0.537 | 0.548 | 1.807 | 0.516 | 0.736 | 0.842 | 0.885 | 1.393 | 0.47 | 1.552 | 1.49 | 0.627 | 1.984 | 0.445 | 2.703 | |
5 | 0.371 | 0.133 | 0.381 | 0.196 | 0.128 | 0.911 | 1.267 | 1.427 | 0.268 | 0.15 | 0.578 | 0.58 | 0.385 | 0.216 | 1.374 | 0.314 | |
6 | 0.811 | 0.251 | 0.548 | 0.568 | 0.305 | 0.265 | 0.788 | 1.536 | 0.718 | 0.366 | 0.837 | 1.865 | 0.643 | 1.105 | 0.923 | 0.642 | |
7 | 1.936 | 0.76 | 2.614 | 0.821 | 0.878 | 0.054 | 0.707 | 0.762 | 1.155 | 1.146 | 1.214 | 1.813 | 1.618 | 1.963 | 1.611 | 1.367 | |
8 | 0.934 | 0.851 | 0.759 | 0.803 | 0.458 | 0.215 | 0.922 | 1.08 | 1.662 | 0.709 | 1.172 | 1.226 | 1.227 | 0.708 | 0.763 | 0.825 | |
9 | 1.308 | 1.106 | 0.373 | 0.492 | 0.3 | 0.278 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.693 | 0.454 | 1.03 | 1.282 | 0.934 | 0.507 | 1.66 | 1.095 | |
10 | 1.518 | 0.956 | 0.83 | 0.479 | 0.527 | 0.24 | 0.435 | 1.062 | 1.164 | 0.951 | 1.534 | 2.625 | 2.122 | 1.823 | 0.773 | 1.444 | |
11 | 0.039 | 0.037 | 0.034 | 0.01 | 0.037 | 0.222 | 1.793 | 1.074 | 0.16 | 0.032 | 0.107 | 0.115 | 0.027 | 0.034 | 0.946 | 0.036 | |
12 | 1.797 | 1.536 | 2.32 | 2.099 | 3.126 | 0.397 | 0.704 | 0.717 | 1.099 | 3.317 | 1.492 | 1.368 | 1.585 | 1.337 | 0.65 | 1.18 | |
13 | 1.744 | 1.654 | 2.011 | 1.941 | 2.68 | 0.322 | 0.667 | 0.883 | 1.122 | 2.589 | 1.458 | 1.131 | 1.328 | 1.802 | 0.953 | 1.478 | |
14 | 1.511 | 0.436 | 0.889 | 0.586 | 0.387 | 0.3 | 0.691 | 1.253 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 1.233 | 1.528 | 1.646 | 1.63 | 1.899 | |
15 | 1.57 | 1.369 | 2.376 | 2.927 | 2.241 | 0.286 | 0.608 | 0.663 | 1.541 | 3.425 | 1.354 | 1.117 | 1.85 | 1.687 | 1.09 | 2.895 | |
2017 | 1 | 0.664 | 1.385 | 1.459 | 0.448 | 0.764 | 0.253 | 1.163 | 1.047 | 0.748 | 0.915 | 0.714 | 1.351 | 0.78 | 0.974 | 1.044 | 0.527 |
2 | 1.271 | 1.684 | 0.405 | 0.645 | 1.392 | 0.268 | 1.296 | 0.761 | 1.658 | 0.49 | 1.375 | 0.585 | 1.247 | 0.855 | 0.32 | 0.77 | |
3 | 0.569 | 0.365 | 0.344 | 0.191 | 0.277 | 1.015 | 0.595 | 1.808 | 0.605 | 0.593 | 0.869 | 0.825 | 0.504 | 0.594 | 0.616 | 0.641 | |
4 | 0.752 | 0.387 | 0.415 | 1.201 | 0.347 | 0.261 | 0.982 | 1.025 | 1.091 | 0.387 | 1.275 | 1.204 | 0.526 | 1.707 | 0.517 | 1.998 | |
5 | 0.613 | 0.199 | 0.481 | 0.31 | 0.161 | 1.532 | 0.451 | 2.018 | 0.377 | 0.252 | 0.804 | 0.85 | 0.487 | 0.332 | 0.279 | 0.397 | |
6 | 0.488 | 0.156 | 0.353 | 0.439 | 0.238 | 1.043 | 0.401 | 1.806 | 0.663 | 0.23 | 0.645 | 1.544 | 0.549 | 0.827 | 0.436 | 0.468 | |
7 | 1.691 | 0.547 | 1.563 | 0.681 | 0.682 | 0.036 | 1.125 | 0.678 | 0.775 | 0.787 | 0.85 | 1.603 | 1.167 | 1.324 | 2.473 | 0.98 | |
8 | 0.894 | 0.72 | 0.601 | 0.556 | 0.344 | 0.217 | 1.02 | 1.038 | 1.346 | 0.833 | 1.038 | 1.114 | 1.191 | 0.741 | 0.919 | 0.902 | |
9 | 0.866 | 0.994 | 0.551 | 0.538 | 0.299 | 0.237 | 0.861 | 1.302 | 0.797 | 0.704 | 1.172 | 0.769 | 1.68 | 0.436 | 0.718 | 0.813 | |
10 | 1.049 | 0.557 | 0.627 | 0.437 | 0.403 | 0.126 | 0.615 | 0.92 | 0.841 | 0.487 | 1.181 | 2.126 | 1.713 | 1.423 | 0.846 | 1.156 | |
11 | 0.086 | 0.121 | 0.095 | 0.091 | 0.029 | 0.717 | 0.194 | 2.737 | 0.459 | 0.099 | 0.554 | 0.261 | 0.047 | 0.089 | 0.056 | 0.113 | |
12 | 1.448 | 1.125 | 1.918 | 1.698 | 2.544 | 0.285 | 1.277 | 0.552 | 0.875 | 2.539 | 1.106 | 1.003 | 1.142 | 1.043 | 1.16 | 0.943 | |
13 | 1.347 | 1.3 | 1.895 | 1.704 | 2.204 | 0.251 | 1.079 | 0.688 | 0.853 | 2.241 | 1.118 | 0.927 | 1.045 | 1.575 | 1.394 | 1.187 | |
14 | 1.213 | 0.484 | 0.81 | 0.385 | 0.282 | 0.222 | 0.678 | 1.291 | 0.732 | 0.56 | 0.906 | 1.05 | 1.345 | 1.23 | 1.489 | 1.341 | |
15 | 1.267 | 1.113 | 1.878 | 2.913 | 1.886 | 0.238 | 1.124 | 0.48 | 1.136 | 2.629 | 0.961 | 0.904 | 1.213 | 1.278 | 1.786 | 2.343 | |
2019 | 1 | 0.575 | 1.31 | 1.212 | 0.359 | 0.667 | 0.323 | 1.145 | 1.063 | 0.608 | 0.932 | 0.776 | 1.344 | 0.825 | 0.918 | 0.872 | 0.515 |
2 | 1.428 | 2.219 | 0.515 | 0.621 | 1.355 | 0.068 | 1.239 | 0.78 | 1.825 | 0.422 | 0.922 | 0.656 | 1.27 | 0.62 | 0.306 | 0.712 | |
3 | 0.548 | 0.281 | 0.3 | 0.174 | 0.292 | 0.311 | 0.66 | 1.872 | 0.482 | 0.416 | 0.643 | 0.577 | 0.541 | 0.569 | 0.525 | 0.607 | |
4 | 0.707 | 0.358 | 0.407 | 1.397 | 0.467 | 0.303 | 0.917 | 0.935 | 1.33 | 0.369 | 0.975 | 1.268 | 0.699 | 1.821 | 0.558 | 2.466 | |
5 | 0.5 | 0.178 | 0.4 | 0.245 | 0.123 | 0.196 | 0.3 | 2.227 | 0.227 | 0.263 | 0.639 | 0.608 | 0.404 | 0.223 | 0.222 | 0.346 | |
6 | 0.595 | 0.155 | 0.57 | 0.457 | 0.265 | 0.266 | 0.451 | 1.436 | 0.771 | 0.262 | 0.845 | 1.811 | 1.079 | 0.853 | 0.443 | 0.679 | |
7 | 1.769 | 0.733 | 1.011 | 1.052 | 0.728 | 0.342 | 1.307 | 0.444 | 0.768 | 1.583 | 0.931 | 1.731 | 0.854 | 1.369 | 1.778 | 1.072 | |
8 | 0.829 | 0.597 | 0.895 | 0.859 | 0.499 | 1.012 | 0.98 | 1.046 | 1.29 | 0.771 | 0.96 | 1.155 | 1.145 | 0.847 | 0.897 | 0.805 | |
9 | 0.741 | 0.7 | 0.666 | 0.443 | 0.537 | 0.705 | 0.864 | 1.412 | 0.687 | 0.754 | 1.016 | 0.707 | 0.693 | 0.731 | 1.078 | 0.787 | |
10 | 1.086 | 0.396 | 0.626 | 0.373 | 0.344 | 0.17 | 0.645 | 0.95 | 0.905 | 0.296 | 1.219 | 1.822 | 1.739 | 1.017 | 0.868 | 1.225 | |
11 | 0.145 | 0.061 | 0.192 | 0.105 | 0.074 | 0.048 | 0.151 | 2.612 | 0.493 | 0.128 | 0.372 | 0.229 | 0.063 | 0.108 | 0.04 | 0.109 | |
12 | 1.344 | 0.915 | 1.904 | 1.826 | 2.379 | 2.87 | 1.315 | 0.536 | 0.85 | 2.194 | 1.236 | 1.092 | 1.109 | 1.004 | 1.046 | 0.979 | |
13 | 1.218 | 1.165 | 1.64 | 1.752 | 2.172 | 2.644 | 1.104 | 0.638 | 1.006 | 1.964 | 1.192 | 0.949 | 1.087 | 1.733 | 1.317 | 1.172 | |
14 | 1.103 | 0.477 | 0.621 | 0.427 | 0.178 | 0.288 | 0.646 | 1.247 | 0.829 | 0.643 | 1.092 | 1.012 | 1.342 | 1.076 | 1.214 | 1.141 | |
15 | 1.229 | 1.096 | 1.85 | 3.165 | 1.748 | 3.446 | 1.205 | 0.423 | 1.024 | 2.556 | 1.377 | 0.738 | 1.304 | 1.724 | 1.603 | 2.002 |
2015 | 2017 | 2019 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
City | Urban Flow Intensity | Rank | City | Urban Flow Intensity | Rank | City | Urban Flow Intensity | Rank |
Urumqi | 69,192.722 | 1 | Beihai | 125,148.012 | 1 | Chengdu | 98,409.059 | 1 |
Chengdu | 69,097.913 | 2 | Chengdu | 97,235.517 | 2 | Urumqi | 92,047.264 | 2 |
Yinchuan | 64,773.66 | 3 | Fangchenggang | 94,163.835 | 3 | Kunming | 89,341.127 | 3 |
Fangchenggang | 63,289.085 | 4 | Liuzhou | 93,438.638 | 4 | Xi’an | 87,808.585 | 4 |
Xi’an | 62,283.64 | 5 | Kunming | 84,412.944 | 5 | Yinchuan | 79,433.843 | 5 |
Guiyang | 58,629.876 | 6 | Xi’an | 78,904.045 | 6 | Guiyang | 78,050.19 | 6 |
Kunming | 55,510.312 | 7 | Urumqi | 74,873.486 | 7 | Liuzhou | 73,337.323 | 7 |
Liuzhou | 54,774.599 | 8 | Nanning | 74,311.793 | 8 | Beihai | 73,259.535 | 8 |
Lanzhou | 52,957.287 | 9 | Guiyang | 74,295.226 | 9 | Chongqing | 72,174.389 | 9 |
Beihai | 51,363.536 | 10 | Lanzhou | 73,472.67 | 10 | Lanzhou | 71,592.151 | 10 |
Chongqing | 48,684.016 | 11 | Yinchuan | 73,030.5 | 11 | Fangchenggang | 69,626.977 | 11 |
Xining | 45,759.795 | 12 | Xining | 72,761.472 | 12 | Nanning | 58,765.703 | 12 |
Nanning | 45,653.957 | 13 | Chongqing | 59,681.658 | 13 | Xining | 53,118.927 | 13 |
Zunyi | 32,691.623 | 14 | Zunyi | 49,619.375 | 14 | Zunyi | 52,748.577 | 14 |
Qinzhou | 27,493.671 | 15 | Qinzhou | 43,377.29 | 15 | Qinzhou | 38,936.429 | 15 |
Danzhou (Yangpu) | 24,011.466 | 16 | Danzhou (Yangpu) | 29,892.628 | 16 | Danzhou (Yangpu) | 37,170.407 | 16 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qin, X.; Qian, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wei, X. Accessibility and Economic Connections between Cities of the New Western Land–Sea Corridor in China—Enlightenments to the Passageway Strategy of Gansu Province. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084445
Qin X, Qian Y, Zeng J, Wei X. Accessibility and Economic Connections between Cities of the New Western Land–Sea Corridor in China—Enlightenments to the Passageway Strategy of Gansu Province. Sustainability. 2022; 14(8):4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084445
Chicago/Turabian StyleQin, Xueyi, Yongsheng Qian, Junwei Zeng, and Xuting Wei. 2022. "Accessibility and Economic Connections between Cities of the New Western Land–Sea Corridor in China—Enlightenments to the Passageway Strategy of Gansu Province" Sustainability 14, no. 8: 4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084445
APA StyleQin, X., Qian, Y., Zeng, J., & Wei, X. (2022). Accessibility and Economic Connections between Cities of the New Western Land–Sea Corridor in China—Enlightenments to the Passageway Strategy of Gansu Province. Sustainability, 14(8), 4445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084445