Next Article in Journal
How Does College Students’ Entrepreneurial Learning Influence Entrepreneurial Intention: Evidence from China
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploration of Transformative Learning Applied to the Triple Bottom Line of Sustainability for Fashion Consumers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Damage Severity and Flexural Steel Ratio on CFRP Repaired RC Beams
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Bitumen Properties through the Utilization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate and Tyre Rubber

by
Omar R. Khaleel
1,
Laila K. N. Al Gharbi
2 and
Moatasem M. Fayyadh
3,*
1
Civil Engineering, Engineering College, Al-Iraqia University, Baghdad 10011, Iraq
2
Civil Engineering, Middle East College, Knowledge Oasis, Muscat 112, Oman
3
Asset Lifecycle, Sydney Water, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9298; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129298
Submission received: 19 April 2023 / Revised: 31 May 2023 / Accepted: 3 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023

Abstract

:
The disposal of waste accumulation has become a significant challenge in Oman due to the increasing population. Co-biodegradability issues arise from accumulating two types of non-co-biodegradable waste materials: plastic and rubber. Asphalted pavements experience various stresses resulting from high traffic density, leading to numerous problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of incorporating waste plastic and rubber on the engineering properties of bitumen. Specifically, the study examines the addition of waste tyre rubber (4% and 6%) and waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (4% and 6%) to bitumen with a grade of 85/100. Three tests were conducted to evaluate the physical properties of the bitumen, including softening points, penetration tests, and viscosity tests. The results demonstrate that the penetration of bitumen with the addition of 6% waste tyre rubber and PET was 9% lower compared to the 4% mixture for both waste materials. Furthermore, tyre rubber-modified bitumen exhibited higher softening points (79 °C, 2580 s) and viscosity when compared to plain bitumen (48 °C, 1800 s) and PET-modified bitumen (53 °C, 2150 s). These differences indicate that incorporating waste PET and tyre rubber improves the engineering properties of bitumen. This study highlights the importance of increasing the softening point of bitumen in Oman’s high-temperature areas.

1. Introduction

Technological advances, widespread industrialization, and consumer habits have intensified the accumulation of unmanageable waste. Among the various waste products, plastic and rubber pose significant challenges as they are non-biodegradable and detrimental to the environment. Proper disposal of plastic and tyre rubber is crucial, particularly in urban and rural areas, where these materials can be recycled and utilized to enhance the properties of bitumen [1]. In Oman, the annual accumulation of these critical waste categories continues to increase, posing a pressing concern.
Asphalt pavement is subjected to multiple stressors, including fatigue, ravelling, and rutting, mainly due to high traffic density, vehicle weight, and speed. Various modifications have been explored to improve the performance of asphalt binders [2,3]. Numerous studies have focused on enhancing the properties of bituminous materials used as binders by incorporating different waste materials [3,4].
Airey et al. [5] reported that using tyre rubber in asphalt mixtures reduces fatigue cracks, enhances tensile strength and toughness, improves skid resistance, and increases elasticity. Zolfaghari et al. [6] investigated the effect of different sizes of tyre rubber crumbs on bitumen and concluded that reducing the size of crumb rubber enhances the penetration value of bitumen. Similarly, Sernas et al. [7] examined the impact of rubber content on bitumen properties using different rubber content percentages and bitumen grades. Their findings demonstrated that an increase in rubber content improves penetration resistance. Mashaan et al. [8] found that incorporating crumb rubber into bituminous materials enhances the softening points of bitumen. Their study revealed that increasing the blending temperature increases the mass of tyre rubber due to rubber swelling during the mixing process. Furthermore, the study highlighted that increasing rubber content effectively improves the stiffness properties of bitumen.
Several investigations have indicated that adding tyre rubber significantly enhances the viscosity of bitumen [9,10,11,12]. Experiments have shown that the melting point of bitumen increases to 53 degrees Celsius with the addition of 1.5% plastic waste and further rises to 56 degrees Celsius with the addition of 6% plastic waste. Additionally, a higher percentage of plastic waste (6%) results in bitumen with higher viscosity (1600 cp), compared to 500 cp obtained with a lower percentage. Thamme Gowda and colleagues [13] concluded that adding thermoplastic materials to bitumen improves viscoelastic behavior. Singh and Ghauhan [14] found that adding 12% crumb rubber to bitumen produces favorable results, including an increased softening point and reduced penetration and ductility.
Studies have also investigated the impact of different plastic wastes, such as polypropylene, on the performance of construction materials. Mazloom and Mirzamohammadi [15] studied the thermal effect on the mechanical properties of mortars containing polypropylene fibres and observed an improvement in compressive strength. Touahri et al. [16] explored the effect of recycled polypropylene fibre on concrete. They found that it enhances mechanical performance, including higher flexural strength, reduces drying shrinkage, and increases permeable pore voids. Pamudji et al. [17] examined the effect of polypropylene waste as coarse aggregate on the behavior of reinforced concrete beams. They observed a noticeable reduction in concrete density and improved structural performance.
According to Taherkhani and Arshadi [18], transforming scrap tyres into crumb rubber involves mechanical grinding under varying conditions. The crumb rubber is then incorporated into asphalt mixtures using two distinct procedures: the wet and dry processes. In the wet process, rubber is blended with asphalt cement at high temperatures using specialized mixers, and the resulting modified asphalt is then combined with hot aggregate in the asphalt plant mixer. In addition, in the dry process, crumb rubber particles are added directly into the aggregate and mixed with hot asphalt cement in the asphalt plant mixer. A critical aspect affecting the performance of rubber-modified binders is crumb rubber and asphalt interaction. This interaction involves simultaneous mechanisms of swelling and dissolution. When rubber particles are added, the asphalt’s aromatic oils are absorbed into the polymer chains of the crumb rubber, causing the rubber particles to swell up to two to three times their original volume and form a gel-like substance. Consequently, the swelling of rubber particles decreases the distances between them, leading to a tenfold increase in binder viscosity. Studies conducted on rubber-modified binders and mixtures have indicated significant improvements in properties such as rutting, fatigue, thermal, and reflective cracking resistance.
According to Mensahn et al. [19], using waste rubber particles in asphalt and asphalt mixtures enhances flexible pavement performance while adhering to environmental regulations. These waste rubber particles can be adjusted for use in open-graded, gap-graded, and dense-graded asphalt pavement, taking into account gradation limits. Additionally, the design mix for ensuring the performance stability of waste rubber particles involves determining the aggregate gradation type, the gradation and percentage of waste rubber particles, optimal bitumen content, and the type of asphalt pavement. Mensahn and colleagues further observed that the control mix design exhibits varying performance effects, considering the percentage dosages of waste rubber particles in the dry and wet processes. The Marshall Stability Test method is a comprehensive means of assessing the structural strength and deformation of the engineering properties of waste rubber particles. In regions with hot temperatures, using waste rubber particles in flexible road pavement can help reduce associated pavement issues such as thermal cracking, fatigue, and permanent deformation (rutting).
Jeong et al. [12] investigated the effect of crumb rubber on bitumen viscosity. They added two different percentages of tyre rubber, 10% and 20%, and determined that 20% of tyre rubber resulted in higher viscosity bitumen than 10%. Khalid and Artamendi [20] also indicated that the viscosity of bitumen increases with crumb rubber, especially at percentages higher than 10%. Neslihan Atasagun [21] demonstrated that combining PET with waste paper improves the viscosity and softening point of pure bitumen.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the influence of waste plastic, specifically polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and waste tyre rubber on the engineering properties of bitumen. The research aims to address the challenges related to the softening point of bitumen in hot weather conditions and the occurrence of potholes in Oman. By examining the effects of these waste materials on the properties of bitumen, valuable insights can be gained to improve the performance and durability of asphalt pavements, ultimately contributing to sustainable waste management and infrastructure development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Bitumen

Bitumen is a dark or black solid material obtained from the distillation of petroleum. It is a viscous adhesive substance consisting of high molecular weight hydrocarbons. At room temperature, bitumen is in a solid state; at 100 °C, it becomes highly viscous [22]. In this study, bitumen grade 85/100 was used. Table 1 presents the physical properties of bitumen grade 85/100, including specific gravity, penetration, and softening point.

2.1.2. Tyre Rubber

A tyre is a pneumatic covering made of synthetic or natural rubber or a combination thereof that encloses a wheel. Tyres are categorized based on their specific usages, such as truck and car tyres [23]. In this study, the tyre rubber used was obtained from United Rubber Industries (URI), ranging in size from 1 mm to 3 mm. Table 2 illustrates the percentage compositions of tyre rubber for truck and car tyres. The primary components of tyres include additives, sulphur, zinc oxide, textile, metal, carbon black, and rubber [23].

2.1.3. Plastic (PET)

PET, which stands for polyethylene terephthalate, is a long-chain polymer that falls under the group of polyesters. PET is formed through a polymerization reaction between alcohol and acid. It is known for being easy to handle, robust, and long-lasting [24]. In this study, the polyethylene terephthalate used was obtained from Octal Company, with a diameter of 2.5 mm. Table 3 presents the properties of polyethylene terephthalate [24].

2.2. Sample Preparation

Conventional Bitumen: A 500 g sample of normal bitumen was prepared in a small pan and heated in the oven until it reached a temperature of 160 °C. Subsequently, three tests were conducted on the bitumen.
Modified Bitumen: To prepare modified bitumen, approximately 500 g of bitumen was heated until it turned into a liquid state. The bitumen was then heated to 160 °C, adding 4% of tyre rubber. The modified bitumen was manually mixed and placed on the penetration apparatus.
As depicted in Figure 1, the three materials utilized in this study were bitumen, waste plastic PET, and waste tyre rubber. Two different percentages, 4% and 6%, of plastic PET and tyre rubber were added to 500 g of bitumen grade 85/100, as outlined in Table 4. The two-tube Saybolt apparatus was employed to evaluate the samples.

2.3. The Experimental Tests

The details of the adopted tests are shown below.

2.3.1. Penetration Test (ASTMD D-5 [25])

The Penetration Test is utilized to determine the consistency or hardness of the bitumen. To prepare the test specimen, the bitumen material was softened at 160 °C and then poured into a container, filling it to a depth of 10 mm. Subsequently, the sample was allowed to cool to the room temperature of 25 °C, and the container was positioned on the penetration apparatus. An initial reading was recorded after ensuring the needle made contact with the sample’s surface. A total load of 100 g was applied, and the needle was released for 5 s. Eventually, a final reading was recorded.

2.3.2. Softening Point Test (ASTMD D-36 [26])

The Softening Point Test is conducted to determine the softening point of the bitumen. The test samples were prepared following the ASTM D-5 standard. Initially, the samples were softened at a temperature of 160 °C. The softened bitumen was then poured into rings placed in a frame, and this entire system was immersed in a water-filled bath at a temperature of 5 °C. Balls were placed in the rings and heat was applied to the bath. The temperature at which the ball made contact with the bottom surface of the plate was noted. The same procedure was repeated for the other ball, and the average softening point values were recorded as the softening point (ASTM D 2019).

2.3.3. Saybolt Two-Tube Viscometer Test (ASTM D-88 [27])

The Saybolt viscometer test is employed to measure the viscosity of the bitumen. The temperature of the bath was carefully regulated. The cork stopper was adequately inserted at the viscometer’s lower part to prevent air from escaping. The sample was preheated and stirred before being dispensed. The receiving flask was positioned correctly, and upon removing the cork, the timer was initiated. The time was recorded from the start of the flow until the last drop.

3. Results and Discussion

The results of the penetration test on various samples are presented in Figure 2, illustrating the impact of different amounts of PET waste and waste tyre rubber on the resistance to water penetration of bitumen. Compared to conventional bitumen, the penetration values decreased by 15% and 23% when 4% and 6% of waste tyre rubber were used as additives, respectively, as indicated by the findings of Manoharan et al. [28]. These results indicate that as the percentages of additives increase, the penetration values decrease. This improvement can be attributed to the ability of waste tyre rubber to enhance the stiffness of bitumen. The interaction between the waste tyre rubber and hot bitumen leads to an increase in the mass and volume of the rubber. As a result of this interaction, the rubber expands due to the absorption of the light oil fraction along with the bitumen [1,8,19].
Furthermore, Figure 2 demonstrates that incorporating 4% and 6% of waste PET into bitumen reduced the penetration values by 11.5% and 16.8%, respectively, as shown in Figure 3. This behavior suggests that the availability of waste PET contributes to a pavement that is more resistant to deformation, such as rutting. This observation is supported by the findings of Kalantar et al. [29], who also found that adding waste PET to bitumen increases its consistency and hardness.
In a study conducted by Manan et al. [30] involving plastic and crumb rubber, it was observed that the penetration value of plastic-modified bitumen decreased more compared to crumb rubber-modified bitumen.
Figure 4 displays the softening point values of different bitumen samples determined through a ring and ball test. The softening point represents the average temperature at which bitumen starts to soften, as discussed by Mashaan et al. [8]. They observed that the rubber content from tyres significantly influences the softening point values, in contrast to the size and type of tyre. They explained that this increase is attributed to the enhanced stiffness of the bitumen resulting from interactions between the tyre, rubber, and bitumen, leading to an increase in the molecular weight of the bitumen.
Figure 4 illustrates the impact of waste PET and tyre rubber content on the softening point of the bitumen sample. The utilization of 4% and 6% of waste tyre rubber improved the softening point by 50.73% and 64.24%, respectively, as shown in Figure 5. In addition, the incorporation of 4% and 6% of waste PET had a minor effect on the bitumen, resulting in slight increases in the softening points, reaching 49.8 °C and 52.8 °C, respectively, which is in agreement with the studies conducted by Kalantar et al. [29] and Suresh and Rao [31]. These studies investigated the effect of PET on various bitumen properties. They concluded that the addition of PET enhances the heat resistance of bitumen, making it less susceptible to temperature changes.
However, it should be noted that some researchers have pointed out that PET is not suitable for bitumen production using the wet process due to its high melting point, which can approach 250 °C. In such cases, PET tends to separate from the bitumen, resulting in a non-uniform blend [32,33,34]. Ahmed and Mahdi [34] examined the effect of PET on bitumen properties using six different ratios ranging from 2% to 12%. They observed that increasing the PET content led to higher softening points.
Additionally, Manan et al. [30] reported that the use of PET in bitumen led to a more significant increase in the softening point compared to the use of crumb rubber.
Viscosity measures the resistance to the flow of a fluid, representing the internal friction within a moving fluid. In this study, the viscosity of bitumen was evaluated using the Saybolt Two-Tube Viscometer test. This test measures the flow rate of bitumen to assess its viscosity. A longer flow time indicates higher viscosity. Figure 6 displays normal and modified bitumen viscosity values and flow times. It is evident from Figure 6 that the flow time of normal bitumen is 1800 s. In contrast, the flow time for the tyre rubber-modified bitumen samples is 2400 s and 2570 s for 4% and 6%, respectively. These increased flow times indicate that increased rubber content leads to higher bitumen viscosity. The increase ratio was 33% and 43% for the 4% and 6% tyre rubber-modified bitumen samples, respectively, as shown in Figure 7.
The flow time for the 4% PET-modified bitumen sample is 1960 s, while for the 6% PET-modified bitumen sample, it is 2160 s. The increase ratios were 8.9% and 20% for the 4% and 6% PET-modified bitumen samples, respectively, as depicted in Figure 7. During heating, tyre rubber was added to the bitumen, resulting in the interaction between the bitumen and tyre rubber. This interaction causes the rubber to swell, creating a gel-like material. The swelling reduces the distance between particles and increases the probability of particle collisions, thereby raising the viscosity of the bitumen [28,29,30]. Ahmad and Mahdi [34] demonstrated that the viscosity of bitumen increases with increasing percentages of PET added to the bitumen, up to 12%. However, beyond that point, the bitumen’s viscosity remains relatively constant. Mahdi et al. [35] determined that incorporating polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in asphalt mixtures led to an increase in the softening temperature and a decrease in the penetration value, increasing the Performance Grade (PG) index. The PG index increased by 308% and 373% for 75 μm and 150 μm PET particle sizes, respectively, when the PET content was increased from 0% to 10%.
The experimental results obtained from both normal and modified bitumen samples generally demonstrate that the addition of waste tyre rubber has a more significant impact on normal bitumen than waste PET.
Manan et al. [30] conducted a study where they added tyre rubber and PET to bitumen. The findings indicated that PET had a more pronounced effect on bitumen than tyre rubber. They observed that the addition of PET resulted in a more significant decrease in the penetration value of bitumen compared to the addition of tyre rubber. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that the softening point of bitumen increased to a greater extent with PET than with tyre rubber.
High viscosity in bitumen at high temperatures is crucial for achieving excellent road paving results. This is because the viscosity of bitumen determines its ability to flow through an asphalt plant and coat aggregates in an asphalt concrete mix. In this study, the viscosity properties of asphalt binder were examined at two different temperatures: 135 °C and 165 °C. The results indicate that the modified binder with the addition of plastic waste exhibits higher viscosity at 135 °C than normal bitumen. As the percentage of plastic waste increases, the viscosity of the binder also increases, indicating a higher viscosity. The graph presented in the study shows that the viscosity of the original bitumen 60–70 at 135 °C is 500 cP, which is lower than that of the bitumen with 6% plastic waste addition [36,37,38,39].
In general, the results of the conducted tests confirm that waste tyre rubber has more beneficial effects on bitumen performance than PET waste. Studies by Manan et al. [30], Casey et al. [32], and Modarres and Hamedi [33] indicate that PET is not suitable for the wet process due to its high melting point, which can reach up to 250 °C.
Ben Zair et al. [40] reported that using PET waste with bitumen offers a suitable waste disposal solution and is beneficial for the environment, considering the large amount of PET waste generated.
Figure 8 illustrates the relationship between the penetration and viscosity results of all normal and modified bitumen samples. The results show that an increase in sample viscosity leads to a decrease in penetration values.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from this investigation:
  • The engineering properties of bitumen have been enhanced by incorporating waste PET and tyre rubber.
  • The utilization of waste PET and waste tyre rubber in bitumen resulted in improved penetration values (ranging from 73 to 80), softening points (ranging from 50 °C to 79 °C), and viscosity (ranging from 1960 to 2580 s).
  • The addition of waste PET and waste tyre rubber improved the consistency of bitumen.
  • Incorporating waste PET or waste tyre rubber into bitumen reduces its susceptibility to temperature changes.
  • Incorporating 6% waste PET or 6% waste tyre rubber into bitumen increases its viscosity by 20% and 43%, respectively.
  • The results indicate that waste tyre rubber has a more significant impact on bitumen than waste PET.
  • The viscosity and softening point of bitumen grade 85/100 in Oman can be enhanced by incorporating 6% waste rubber and 6% PET, especially in severe conditions with higher temperatures during summer weather.
  • Several studies have reported that adding crumb rubber and PET flakes enhances the softening point, consistency, and viscosity of bitumen.
  • Lastly, the use of crumb rubber waste and PET waste is considered environmentally friendly.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.R.K.; methodology, O.R.K.; validation, M.M.F.; formal analysis, O.R.K. and M.M.F.; investigation, L.K.N.A.G.; resources, O.R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.N.A.G.; writing—review and editing, M.M.F.; visualization, L.K.N.A.G.; supervision, M.M.F.; project administration, L.K.N.A.G.; funding acquisition, O.R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the technicians of the Civil Engineering Department laboratory for their help in the experimental works. Our thanks are also extended to the United Rubber Industries (URI) Company and Octal Company for providing us with the materials used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Azizi, G.; Rashid, G. Review Paper on Use of Waste Plastic, Waste Rubber and Fly Ash in Bituminous Mixes. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 5, 592–595. [Google Scholar]
  2. Remadevi, M.; Pillai, A.G.; George, E.B.; Narayanan, P.; Sunny, S. Study of Fibre Reinforced Bituminous Concrete. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 2014, 10, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhaddad, F.T.A. Studying the Effect of Adding Crumb Rubber on the Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Mixtures (Wearing Course Layer). Ph.D. Dissertation, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yin, J.; Wang, S.; Lv, F. Improving the short-term aging resistance of asphalt by addition of crumb rubber radiated by microwave and impregnated in epoxidized soybean oil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 49, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Airey, G.; Rahman, M.; Collop, A.C. Crumb Rubber and Bitumen Interaction as a Function of Crude Source and Bitumen Viscosity. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2004, 5, 453–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zolfaghari, F.A.; Zolfaghari, F.; Javid, M. Modification of Bitumen by Varying Size of the Crumb Rubber in Coarse Graded Aggregates. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res. 2014, 3, 4435–4444. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sernas, O.; Cygas, D.; Vaitkus, A.; Gumauskaite, V. The Influence of Crumb Rubber on Modified Bitumen Properties. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Environmental Engineering, Vilnius, Lithuania, 27–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mashaan, N.; Ali, A.; Karim, M.R.; Abdelaziz, M. Effect of Crumb Rubber Concentration on the Physical and Rheological Properties of Rubberized Bitumen Binders. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2011, 6, 684–690. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ibrahim, M.R.; Katman, H.Y.; Karim, M.R.; Koting, S.; Mashaan, N.S. A Review on the Effect of Crumb Rubber Addition to the Rheology of Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 415246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nejad, F.M.; Aghajani, P.; Modarres, A.; Firoozifar, H. Investigating the properties of crumb rubber modified bitumen using classic and SHRP testing methods. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.; You, Z.; Mills-Beale, J.; Hao, P. Laboratory evaluation on high temperature viscosity and low temperature stiffness of asphalt binder with high percent scrap tire rubber. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jeong, K.-D.; Lee, S.-J.; Amirkhanian, S.N.; Kim, K.W. Interaction effects of crumb rubber modified asphalt binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thamme Gowda, C.S.; Krishnappab, G.B.; Shashanka, G.R.; Jalukab, R.; Rishab, J.; Sachin, S.H. Evaluating the Performance of Different Types of Waste Plastic-Bitumen Mixtures for Road Construction—A Review. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 10007–10012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh, G.; Chauhan, R. Experimental study on the behavior of modified bituminous concrete mix developed using plastic waste and scrapped rubber tyre. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazloom, M.; Mirzamohammadi, S. Thermal effects on the mechanical properties of cement mortars reinforced with aramid, glass, basalt and polypropylene fibers. Adv. Mater. Res. 2019, 8, 137–154. [Google Scholar]
  16. Touahri, A.; Branci, T.; Yahia, A.; Ezziane, K. Effect of recycled polypropylene fiber on high strength concrete and normal strength concrete properties. Adv. Mater. Res. 2021, 10, 267–281. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pamudji, G.; Haryanto, Y.; Hu, H.T.; Asriani, F.; Nugroho, L. The flexural behavior of RC beams with sand-coated polypropylene waste coarse aggregate at different w/c ratios. Adv. Mater. Res. 2021, 10, 313–329. [Google Scholar]
  18. Taherkhani, H.; Arshadi, M.R. Investigating the Effects of Using Waste Rubber and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) on Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2018, 9, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Elvis, S.K.; Lameck Lugeiyamu, M.; Kunlin, M. Flexible Pavement: A Review on the Influence of Waste RuberParticles in Asphalt and Asphalt Mixtures. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. (IRJET) 2020, 9, 3250–3260. [Google Scholar]
  20. Khalid, H.A.; Artamendi, I. Performance Based Characterisation of Crumb Rubber Asphalt Modified Using the Wet Process. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2003, 4, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Atasa Gun, N. High-Temperature Rheological Properties and Storage Stability of Bitumen Modified with the Char Produced from Co-Pyrolysis of Different Wastes. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chattaraj, R. Bitumen—A very versatile construction. Mater. Relat. Highw. Eng. 2019, 3, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mushunje, K.; Otieno, M.; Ballim, Y. A Review of Waste Tyre Rubber as an Alternative Concrete Consituent Material. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 199, 11003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Awaja, F.; Pavel, D. Recycling of PET. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 1453–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ASTM-D5; Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PE, USA, 2013.
  26. ASTM-D36; Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus). ASTM: West Conshohocken, PE, USA, 2010.
  27. ASTM-D88; Standard Test Method for Saybolt Viscosity. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PE, USA, 2013.
  28. Manoharan, M.; Daniel, J.J.; Premkumar, S.; Vedhanayaghi, V.J. Study on Behaviour of Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 342–351. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalantar, Z.; Mahrez, A.; Karim, M. Properties of Bituminous Binder Modified with Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET). Mater. Sci. 2009, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  30. Manan, A.; Singla, S.; Kaushal, M. A Study on Comparison of Plastic Bitumen and Crumb Rubber Bitumen. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018, 6, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  31. Suresh, B.; Rao, N. Determination of Physical and Rehological Properties of Bitumen Mixed with Waste Plastic. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 985–990. [Google Scholar]
  32. Casey, D.; McNally, C.; Gibney, A.; Gilchrist, M.D. Development of a recycled polymer modified binder for use in stone mastic asphalt. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 52, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Modarres, A.; Hamedi, H. Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes. Mater. Des. 2014, 61, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahmad, M.S.; Mahdi, F. Characterization of Bitumen Mixed with Plastic Waste. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahdi, T.W.; Senadheera, S.; Ghebrab, T. Effect of PET Size, Content and Mixing Process on the Rheological Characteristics of Flexible Pavement. Materials 2022, 15, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abdelrahman, M.A.; Carpenter, S.H. Mechanism of Interaction of Asphalt Cement with Crumb Rubber Modifier. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1999, 1661, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bahia, H.U.; Davies, R. Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on Performance-Related Properties of Asphalt Binders. In Proceedings of the Asphalt Paving Technology Conference, St. Louis, MI, USA, 21–23 March 1994. [Google Scholar]
  38. Heitzman, M. Design and Construction of Asphalt Paving Materials with Crumb Rubber Modifier. Transp. Res. Rec. 1992, 1339, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Abdullah, M.E.; Ahmad, N.A.; Jaya, R.P.; Hassan, N.A.; Yaacob, H.; Hainin, M.R. Effects of Waste Plastic on the Physical and Rheological Properties of Bitumen. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 204, 12016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ben Zair, M.; Jakarni, F.; Muniandy, R.; Hassim, S. A Brief Review: Application of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate in Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Samples of the used materials.
Figure 1. Samples of the used materials.
Sustainability 15 09298 g001
Figure 2. The values of penetration test of samples.
Figure 2. The values of penetration test of samples.
Sustainability 15 09298 g002
Figure 3. The differentiated rate of penetration values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Figure 3. The differentiated rate of penetration values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Sustainability 15 09298 g003
Figure 4. Softening point results of bitumen samples.
Figure 4. Softening point results of bitumen samples.
Sustainability 15 09298 g004
Figure 5. The differentiated rate of softening point values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Figure 5. The differentiated rate of softening point values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Sustainability 15 09298 g005
Figure 6. Viscosity results of normal and modified bitumen samples.
Figure 6. Viscosity results of normal and modified bitumen samples.
Sustainability 15 09298 g006
Figure 7. The differentiated rate of viscosity values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Figure 7. The differentiated rate of viscosity values of modified samples to normal bitumen values.
Sustainability 15 09298 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between data of penetration test and viscosity test.
Figure 8. Relationship between data of penetration test and viscosity test.
Sustainability 15 09298 g008
Table 1. The properties of bitumen grade 85/100.
Table 1. The properties of bitumen grade 85/100.
Bitumen 85/100ASTM Standard LimitsStandard
Specific gravity at
25 °C
1.01–1.05ASTM D-70
Penetration at
25 °C, 5 s, 100 g,
0.1 mm
85–100ASTM D-5
Softening point
(°C)
45–52ASTM D-36
Table 2. The chemical compositions of tyre.
Table 2. The chemical compositions of tyre.
IngredientPercentage Composition—TruckPercentage Composition—Car
Additives5%7.5%
Sulphur1%1%
Zinc oxide2%1%
Textile-5.5%
Metal25%16.5%
Carbon black22%21.5%
Rubber45%47%
Table 3. The properties of PET.
Table 3. The properties of PET.
PropertiesValueStandard
Specific gravity1.28ASTM D792
Melting temperature265 °C
Moisture absorption0.1
Tensile strength850 kPa
Table 4. Sample details.
Table 4. Sample details.
Sample NumberSample Bitumen (gram)Tyre
Rubber (gram)
Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) (gram)
1Normal bitumen500--
2Normal bitumen + 4% tyre rubber50020-
3Normal bitumen + 6% tyre rubber50030-
4Normal bitumen + 4% PET500-20
5Normal bitumen + 6% PET500-30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khaleel, O.R.; Al Gharbi, L.K.N.; Fayyadh, M.M. Enhancing Bitumen Properties through the Utilization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate and Tyre Rubber. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129298

AMA Style

Khaleel OR, Al Gharbi LKN, Fayyadh MM. Enhancing Bitumen Properties through the Utilization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate and Tyre Rubber. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khaleel, Omar R., Laila K. N. Al Gharbi, and Moatasem M. Fayyadh. 2023. "Enhancing Bitumen Properties through the Utilization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate and Tyre Rubber" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129298

APA Style

Khaleel, O. R., Al Gharbi, L. K. N., & Fayyadh, M. M. (2023). Enhancing Bitumen Properties through the Utilization of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate and Tyre Rubber. Sustainability, 15(12), 9298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop