Tourists’ Motivation in Wetland Destinations: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Case Study (Mura-Drava-Danube Transboundary Biosphere Reserve)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Tourists’ perception of the Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve image, as one of four important wetlands, protected under the Ramsar Convention, of the Mura-Drava-Danube Biosphere Reserve, as well as on tourists’ motives for visiting wetlands (including their interests and affinities) and satisfaction (including their intentions to return).
- Additionally, this research was also focused on relationships between previously mentioned constructs and tourists’ socio-demographic characteristics and visit characteristics.
- Finally, this study attempts to address the relationship between tourists’ motives for visiting, their image perception and satisfaction with the visit.
2. Literature Review
Case Study Area
3. Methodology
3.1. Instrument
3.2. Data Collecting Procedure
3.3. Methods and Main Procedures of the Study
4. Results
4.1. Sample
4.2. Characteristics of Visits
4.3. Results of Exploratory Factor Analysis
4.4. Results of Multivariate General Linear Model
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions, Limitations and Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, T.; Weng, B.; Yan, D.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Bi, W.; Li, M.; Cheng, X.; Liu, Y. Wetlands of International Importance: Status, Threats, and Future Protection. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MEA. Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, T.; Sheng, L.; Zhuang, J.; Lv, X.; Cai, J. Function, restoration, and ecosystem services of riverine wetlands in the temperate zone. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 137, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. Wetland-based tourism in South Korea: Who, when, and why. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 23, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsar & UNWTO. Wetland Tourism: A Great Experience, Responsible Tourism Supports Wetlands and People. 2012. Available online: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/ramsar-wwd2012-leaflet-en.pdf (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Available online: www.ramsar.org (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Sandell, K. Tourism—As exploration and demonstration of which sustainable development? The case of a biosphere reserve. Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2018, 66, 161–176. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, T.H. A structural model to examine how destination image, attitude, and motivation affect the future behavior of tourists. Leis. Sci. 2009, 31, 215–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigne, J.E.; Sanchez, M.I.; Sanchez, J. Tourism image, evaluation variables and after purchase behavior: Interrelationship. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, B.Q.; Ao, C.L.; Wang, J.X.; Xu, L.S. The importance of loss aversion in public preferences for wetland management policies: Evidence from a choice experiment with reference-dependent discrete choice model. Wetlands 2020, 40, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pueyo-Ros, J.; Ribas, A.; Fraguell, R.M. Uses and preferences of visitors to coastal wetlands in tourism destinations (Costa Brava, Spain). Wetlands 2018, 38, 1183–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Christiansen, S.; López-Guzmán, T.; Pérez Gálvez, J.C.; Muñoz Fernández, G.A. Wetland tourism in natural protected areas: Santay Island (Ecuador). Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2016, 20, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, B.; Ao, C.; Wang, J.; Mao, B.; Xu, L. Listen to the voices from tourists: Evaluation of wetland ecotourism satisfaction using an online reviews mining approach. Wetlands 2020, 40, 1379–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beh, A.; Bruyere, B.L. Segmentation by visitor motivation in three Kenyan national reserves. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 1464–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, A.T.; Chow, A.S.; Cheung, L.T.; Lee, K.M.; Liu, S. Impacts of tourists’ sociodemographic characteristics on the travel motivation and satisfaction: The case of protected areas in South China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shakoori, A.; Hosseini, M. An examination of the effects of motivation on visitors’ loyalty: Case study of the Golestan Palace, Tehran. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 32, 100554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragin, A.; Dragin, V.; Košić, K.; Demirović, D.; Ivkov-Džigurski, A. Tourists motives and residents attitude towards cruisers. South. East. Eur. 2017, 4, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovanovic, T.; Dragin, A.; Armenski, T.; Pavic, D.; Davidovic, N. What demotivates the tourist? Constraining factors of nautical tourism. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2013, 30, 858–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehmetoglu, M.; Normann, Ø. The link between travel motives and activities in nature-based tourism. Tour. Rev. 2013, 68, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, L.T.; Fok, L. The motivations and environmental attitudes of nature-based visitors to protected areas in Hong Kong. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2014, 21, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Radin, M.B.; Vujičić, M.D.; Todorović, N.; Dragin, A.S.; Stankov, U.; Mijatov, M.B. Modeling spa destination choice for leveraging hydrogeothermal potentials in Serbia. Open Geosci. 2022, 14, 906–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marković, S.S.; Perić, M.R.; Mijatov, M.B.; Dragin, A.S.; Doljak, D.L. Attitudes of the local population in border municipalities on development of sport-event tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2021, 45, 1282–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mijatov, M.; Pantelić, M.; Dragin, A.; Perić, M.; Marković, S. Application of sustainable development principles in hotel business. J. Geogr. Inst. Jovan Cvijić SASA 2018, 68, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stojanović, V.; Mijatov, M.; Dunjić, J.; Lazić, L.; Dragin, A.; Milić, D.; Obradović, S. Ecotourism impact assessment on environment in protected areas of Serbia: A case study of Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve. Geogr. Pannonica 2021, 25, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, A.S.; Cheng, I.N.; Cheung, L.T. Self-determined travel motivations and ecologically responsible attitudes of nature-based visitors to the Ramsar wetland in South China. Ann. Leis. Res. 2019, 22, 42–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, Y.; Zielinski, S.; Chang, J.-S.; Kim, S.-I. Comparing motivation-based and motivation-attitude-based segmentation of tourists visiting sensitive destinations. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kamri, T.; Radam, A. Motivation of Visiting Bako National Park. Asian J. Qual. Life 2018, 3, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, J.B.; Chan, S. A new nature-based tourism motivation model: Testing the moderating effects of the push motivation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2016, 18, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panin, B.; Mbrica, A. Potentials of eco-tourism as a rural development tool on the base of motivation factors in Serbia. In Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in Terms of the Republic of Serbia Strategic Goals Realization within the Danube Region. Rural Development and (un) Limited Resources; Institute of Agricultural Economic: Belgrade, Serbia, 2014; pp. 597–613. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L.; Ao, C.; Liu, B.; Cai, Z. Exploring the Influence of Multidimensional Tourist Satisfaction on Preferences for Wetland Ecotourism: A Case Study in Zhalong National Nature Reserve, China. Wetlands 2021, 41, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvache-Franco, M.; Carvache-Franco, O.; Carvache-Franco, W. Exploring the satisfaction of ecotourism in protected natural areas. Geo J. Tour. Geosites 2020, 29, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; He, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Ye, K.; Yang, X.; Kong, Z.; Su, Y. Framework for Valuating Urban Wetland Park Ecosystem Services Based on the Cascade Approach. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 2429–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, N.; Yang, R. Comeparative study on current visitor management models for national parks and protected areas. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2005, 7, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.T.; Liu, F.; Soutar, G.N. Experiences, post-trip destination image, satisfaction and loyalty: A study in an ecotourism context. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 19, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aniqoh, N.A.F.A.; Sihombing, N.S.; Sinaga, S.; Simbolon, S.; Sitorus, S.A. Destination Image, Tourist Satisfaction and Loyalty in the Eco-Tourism Environment. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 2022, 13, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, G. Ecotourists’ motivation and revisit intention: A case study of restored ecological parks in South Korea. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2014, 19, 1327–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vareiro, L.; Ribeiro, J.C.; Remoaldo, P.C. What influences a tourist to return to a cultural destination? Int. J. Tour. Res. 2019, 21, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, X.; Fu, X.; Yu, L.; Jiang, L. Authenticity and loyalty at heritage sites: The moderation effect of postmodern authenticity. Tour. Manag. 2018, 67, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvache-Franco, M.; Carvache-Franco, O.; Víquez-Paniagua, A.G.; Carvache-Franco, W.; Perez-Orozco, A. Sociodemographic aspects and their relationship with motivations, satisfaction and loyalty in ecotourism: A study in Costa Rica. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 12, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: www.unesco.org (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Mura, F.; Drava, D. The Amazon of Europe: World’s First 5-Country Biosphere Reserve; WWF: Gland, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tucakov, M. Protected areas in the Biosphere Reserve are its most valuable resource. In Bačko Podunavlje Biosphere Reserve—Nature and People; Zagorac, D., Ed.; Provincial Secretariat for Urban Planning and Environmental Protection, Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvodina Province: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2018; pp. 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Panjković, B.; Stojnić, N. Biodiversity and protected areas. In Environment in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina; Puzović, S., Radovanović-Jovin, H., Eds.; Provincial Secretariat for Urban Planning, Construction and Environmental Protection: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia. Protection Study of Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve; Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia: Beograd, Serbia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: www.europarc.org (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Stojanović, V.; Mijatov, M.; Obradović, S. Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve—Sustainable Tourism Strategy; Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management Faculty of Sciences: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Stojanović, V.; Mijatov, M.; Obradović, S. Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve—Action Plan for Sustainable Tourism (2021–2025); Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Stojanović, V.; Mijatov, M. Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Visitor Management Plan; PE Vojvodinašume and Department for Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ghoochani, M.; Ghanian, O.; Khosravipour, M.; Crotts, J.B. Explaining a Framework for Expanding Support for the Development of Rural Tourism Based on the Integration of Social Exchange and Place Image Theories (Case Study: Villages in the Wetland Areas of the Khuzestan Province. J. Rural. Res. 2019, 10, 452–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Court, B.; Lupton, R.A. Customer portfolio development, modeling destination adopter, in actives and rejecters. J. Travel Res. 1997, 36, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birgit, L. Image segmentation: The case of a tourism destination. J. Serv. Mark. 2001, 15, 49–66. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.H.; Chen, T.Y.; Liu, C.R. The influence of tourism image on tourists’ behavioral intention on Taiwan’s coastal scenic area: Testing the mediating variable of tourists’ satisfaction. J. Outdoor Recreat. Study 2003, 16, 1–22, (Chinese with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
- Iversen, N.M.; Hem, L.E.; Mehmetoglu, M. Lifestyle segmentation of tourists seeking nature-based experiences: The role of cultural values and travel motives. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2016, 33 (Suppl. S1), 38–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, P.; Chen, L.; Luo, Z. Analysis of Tourism Experience in Haizhu National Wetland Park Based on Web Text. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, I.; Adongo, C.A.; Amuquandoh, F.E. A structural decompositional analysis of eco-visitors’ motivations, satisfaction and post-purchase behaviour. J. Ecotour. 2019, 18, 60–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.F.; Chen, F.S. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Chen, J.S.; Fan, L.; Lu, J. Tourist experience and wetland parks: A case of Zhejiang, China. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 1763–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, S.M.; Liang, G.S.; Yang, S.H. The Relationships of Cruise Image, Perceived Value, Satisfaction, and Post-Purchase Behavioral Intention on Taiwanese Tourists. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2011, 5, 19–29. Available online: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Lee, T.H.; Jan, F.-H.; Tseng, C.H.; Lin, Y.F. Segmentation by recreation experience in island-based tourism: A case study of Taiwan’s Liuqiu Island. J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 362–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items α = 0.970 | Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 α = 0.949 | 2 α = 0.913 | 3 α = 0.903 | 4 α = 0.899 | |
Satisfaction with the service quality | 0.841 | |||
Satisfaction with the number of encounters with other tourists | 0.835 | |||
Satisfaction with the content of ecological tours | 0.833 | |||
Satisfaction with the price of tickets | 0.812 | |||
Image perception related to the offer of a variety of leisure activities | 0.791 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the possibility of contacting the Manager | 0.783 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the possibility of meeting the other tourists with the same interests | 0.740 | |||
Satisfaction with the safety in the field | 0.696 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the historical development | 0.658 | |||
Satisfaction with the overall impression | 0.615 | |||
Satisfaction with the acquisition of knowledge within the ecosystem revitalization program | 0.525 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the possibility to participate in ecological tours | 0.513 | |||
Image perception related to the ecological experience, the possibility of learning about nature protection | 0.480 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the geographic characteristics | 0.459 | |||
Motivation related to relaxation | 0.926 | |||
Motivation related to socializing in nature | 0.864 | |||
Motivation related to spending time in nature | 0.794 | |||
Motivation related to maintaining physical condition and improving health | 0.678 | |||
Satisfaction with nature and landscapes | 0.589 | |||
Satisfaction with the possibility of recreation | 0.571 | |||
Intention to recommend the visit to others | 0.554 | |||
Intention to visit the Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve again | 0.535 | |||
Intention to visit the rural settlements in the vicinity (ethno-houses, farms, events) | 0.391 | |||
Image perception related to the status of protected area | 0.376 | |||
Motivation to learn something new about the wetlands | 0.885 | |||
Motivation to experience a wetland environment | 0.800 | |||
Motivation to participate in the ecological education | 0.751 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the presence of a general habit of visiting wetlands | 0.610 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the intention to visit a wetland (swamp, lake, canals) | 0.495 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the soil and water protection | 0.480 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the environmental protection | 0.425 | |||
Motivation related to the search for a different experience | 0.415 | |||
Image perception related to diversity of plant and animal species | 0.837 | |||
Image perception related to diversity of landscapes | 0.703 | |||
Satisfaction with the possibilities of observing the flora and fauna | 0.656 | |||
Satisfaction with the wetland biodiversity | 0.615 | |||
Image perception related to the ecosystem revitalization programs | 0.564 | |||
Motivation related to the observation of the plant world | 0.536 | |||
Interests and affinities related to the habitats of protected species of flora and fauna | 0.489 | |||
Motivation related to the observation of the animal world | 0.443 |
Factor | Mean Value | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|
Satisfaction and experience | 3.89 | 0.87 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 4.53 | 0.61 |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 4.09 | 0.83 |
Image based on the biodiversity | 4.23 | 0.71 |
Source | F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Satisfaction and experience | 0.496 | 0.610 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 0.964 | 0.383 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 0.866 | 0.422 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 0.474 | 0.623 | |
Education Degree | Satisfaction and experience | 0.682 | 0.638 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 0.475 | 0.795 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 0.755 | 0.583 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 1.974 | 0.084 | |
Current working status | Satisfaction and experience | 2.468 | 0.046 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 3.070 | 0.018 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 1.040 | 0.388 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 2.837 | 0.026 | |
Place of the residence | Satisfaction and experience | 0.271 | 0.763 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 1.587 | 0.207 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 0.443 | 0.643 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 2.136 | 0.121 | |
Age | Satisfaction and experience | 2.633 | 0.106 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 8.136 | 0.005 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 3.593 | 0.060 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 6.211 | 0.014 |
Source | F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|
The manner of organizing the visit | Satisfaction and experience | 3.433 | 0.065 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 0.149 | 0.700 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 1.110 | 0.293 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 3.294 | 0.071 | |
Companion de voyage | Satisfaction and experience | 1.400 | 0.244 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 1.759 | 0.156 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 1.915 | 0.128 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 1.677 | 0.173 | |
Duration of the visit | Satisfaction and experience | 2.456 | 0.035 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 2.724 | 0.021 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 2.068 | 0.071 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 1.687 | 0.140 | |
Improvement requirements | Satisfaction and experience | 1.522 | 0.185 |
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 1.748 | 0.126 | |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 2.891 | 0.015 | |
Image based on the biodiversity | 2.319 | 0.045 |
Source | F | Sig. |
---|---|---|
Motivation for spending time in nature and future behavior | 2.853 | 0.000 |
Motivation for spending time particularly in wetlands | 4.174 | 0.000 |
Image based on the biodiversity | 2.113 | 0.007 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Stojanović, V.; Mijatov Ladičorbić, M.; Dragin, A.S.; Cimbaljević, M.; Obradović, S.; Dolinaj, D.; Jovanović, T.; Ivkov-Džigurski, A.; Dunjić, J.; Nedeljković Knežević, M.; et al. Tourists’ Motivation in Wetland Destinations: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Case Study (Mura-Drava-Danube Transboundary Biosphere Reserve). Sustainability 2023, 15, 9598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129598
Stojanović V, Mijatov Ladičorbić M, Dragin AS, Cimbaljević M, Obradović S, Dolinaj D, Jovanović T, Ivkov-Džigurski A, Dunjić J, Nedeljković Knežević M, et al. Tourists’ Motivation in Wetland Destinations: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Case Study (Mura-Drava-Danube Transboundary Biosphere Reserve). Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129598
Chicago/Turabian StyleStojanović, Vladimir, Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić, Aleksandra S. Dragin, Marija Cimbaljević, Sanja Obradović, Dragan Dolinaj, Tamara Jovanović, Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski, Jelena Dunjić, Milena Nedeljković Knežević, and et al. 2023. "Tourists’ Motivation in Wetland Destinations: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Case Study (Mura-Drava-Danube Transboundary Biosphere Reserve)" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129598
APA StyleStojanović, V., Mijatov Ladičorbić, M., Dragin, A. S., Cimbaljević, M., Obradović, S., Dolinaj, D., Jovanović, T., Ivkov-Džigurski, A., Dunjić, J., Nedeljković Knežević, M., & Marković, V. (2023). Tourists’ Motivation in Wetland Destinations: Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve Case Study (Mura-Drava-Danube Transboundary Biosphere Reserve). Sustainability, 15(12), 9598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129598