EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. EREMI in a Nutshell
1.2. Literature Review: Relevant Landscape—Resource Efficiency, Manufacturing, Higher Education and Beyond
- ICARUS
- EUGPUT
- DIGITAL INNOVATION
1.3. Structure of the Paper
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Challenges Faced by EREMI
2.2. The EREMI Project Consortium and Task Allocation
- Mechanical engineering;
- Electrical engineering;
- Systems engineering;
- Pneumatics;
- Energy efficiency;
- Industrial economics.
- Communication systems;
- Sensor systems;
- Edge computing.
2.3. The EREMI Learning Contents Package
2.4. The Desired Impact of EREMI
2.5. The Quality Feedback Survey of EREMI: Strategic Approach and High-Added-Value Project Element
3. Results
3.1. The EREMI Close-to-Practice Interactive Learning Contents Package Will Be an Answer to the Challenges Faced Today by the Industry in the Context of Upskilling, Lifelong Learning, and Rapid Digitalisation in the Following Directions
3.2. The EREMI Learning Platform’s Goal Is to Be an Easy-to-Use Place and Means for Interdisciplinary Modern Industrial Knowledge to Be Disseminated among Willing Learners
3.3. The EREMI Platform and the Distribution of Its Quality Feedback Survey and Assessment System as a Standard, Where Its Impact Is Expected to Be That It Allows the Better Evolution of the Project for Each Involved Stakeholder: Survey Results
4. Discussion
- -
- Create a better link between theory and practice throughout the education process, as this is likely to lead to the best outcomes for both individual learners and industry.
- -
- Create a more flexible education system that allows easy knowledge transfer and the development of new courses aimed at future professionals.
- -
- Allow teaching staff to upgrade their qualifications more easily in order to bring classical university courses closer to the needs of modern industry.
- -
- Enable industry professionals from outside academia to teach and transfer much-needed knowledge and skills to higher education institutions.
- -
- Connecting different disciplines in an interdisciplinary curriculum is the right formula for generating the much-needed human capital of the future highly digitised yet physical industrial European landscape.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kraaijenbrink, J. What Is Industry 5.0 and How It Will Radically Change Your Business Strategy? Forbes 2022. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeroenkraaijenbrink/2022/05/24/what-is-industry-50-and-how-it-will-radically-change-your-business-strategy/?sh=21f6f93020bd (accessed on 13 February 2023).
- Kozák, Š.; Ružický, E.; Štefanovič, J.; Schindler, F. Research and education for industry 4.0: Present development. In 2018 Cybernetics & Informatics (K&I); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Mian, S.H.; Salah, B.; Ameen, W.; Moiduddin, K.; Alkhalefah, H. Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan Edward, P. The fourth industrial revolution and higher education. High. Educ. Era Fourth Ind. Revolut. 2018, 10, 978–981. [Google Scholar]
- Sofic, A.; Rakic, S.; Pezzotta, G.; Markoski, B.; Arioli, V.; Marjanovic, U. Smart and Resilient Transformation of Manufacturing Firms. Processes 2022, 10, 2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaidya, S.; Ambad, P.; Bhosle, S. Industry 4.0—A Glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salunkhea, O.; Berglund, Å.F. Industry 4.0 enabling technologies for increasing operational flexibility in final assembly. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2022, 13, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, K.; Cadeaux, J.; Luo, B.N. Operational flexibility: Review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 169, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, D.; Lin, P.; Lyu, Z.; Ling, S.; Li, M.; Huang, G.Q.; Rong, Y. Towards assembly 4.0: Graduation intelligent manufacturing system for fixed-position assembly islands. IFAC-Pap. 2019, 52, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauge, J.B.; Zafarzadeh, M.; Jeong, Y.; Li, Y.; Khilji, W.A.; Larsen, C.; Wiktorsson, M.; Mathematics, G.F.-C.C.F.I.; Manufacturing, G.V. Digital twin testbed and practical applications in production logistics with real-time location data. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2021, 12, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastos, T.; Salvadorinho, J.; Teixeira, L. UpSkill@Mgmt 4.0—A digital tool for competence management: Conceptual model and a prototype. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2022, 13, 225–238. Available online: http://www.ijiemjournal.uns.ac.rs/images/journal/volume13/IJIEM_315.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2023). [CrossRef]
- Seleznev, P.S.; Naumov, V.N.; Zorin, V.Y.; Zelenov, V.I.; Tsyplenkov, D.S.; Vasiliev, V.G. Research and Development of a Unified Methodology for Assessing the Resource Efficiency of International Digital Platform Promotion for E-Learning. Symmetry 2022, 14, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-de-Menendez, M.; Escobar Díaz, C.A.; Morales-Menendez, R. Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: A review. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 2020, 14, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oke, A.; Fernandes, F.A.P. Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayak, J.; Mishra, M.; Naik, B.; Swapnarekha, H.; Cengiz, K.; Shanmuganathan, V. An impact study of COVID-19 on six different industries: Automobile, energy and power, agriculture, education, travel and tourism and consumer electronics. Expert Syst. 2022, 39, e12677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benavides, L.M.C.; Arias, J.A.T.; Serna, M.D.A.; Bedoya, J.W.B.; Burgos, D. Digital Transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepankiewicz, E.I.; Fazlagić, J.; Loopesko, W. A conceptual model for developing climate education in sustainability management education system. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acosta Castellanos, P.M.; Queiruga-Dios, A.; Álvarez, L.G. Inclusion of Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental Engineering. A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finnveden, G.; Schneider, A. Sustainable Development in Higher Education—What Sustainability Skills Do Industry Need? Sustainability 2023, 15, 4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejedor, G.; Sánchez-Carracedo, F.; Segalàs, J. Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education-Introduction to a Special Issue. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meramveliotakis, G.; Manioudis, M. History, Knowledge, and Sustainable Economic Development: The Contribution of John Stuart Mill’s Grand Stage Theory. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1468. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1468 (accessed on 13 January 2023). [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, P. The idea of sustainable development. Sustain. Sci. 2007, 2, 5–11. Available online: https://d3pcsg2wjq9izr.cloudfront.net/files/6063/articles/15024/art2.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2023). [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/topical_collections/higher_education_sustainable (accessed on 6 May 2023).
- Miranda, J.; Navarrete, C.; Noguez, J.; Molina-Espinosa, J.-M.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S.; Navarro-Tuch, S.A.; Bustamante-Bello, M.-R.; Rosas-Fernández, J.-B.; Molina, A. The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2021, 93, 107278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas, R.P. Teaching robotics to undergraduate computer science students: A different approach. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA, 16–19 October 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Paredes, S.G.; Vazquez, N.R. My Teacher is a Hologram: Measuring innovative STEM learning experiences. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), Princeton, NJ, USA, 16 March 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 332–337. [Google Scholar]
- Kipper, L.M.; Iepsen, S.; Forno, A.J.D.; Frozza, R.; Furstenau, L.; Agnes, J.; Cossul, D. Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technol. Soc. 2020, 64, 101454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nhamo, G.; Mjimba, V. (Eds.) Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Harangi-Rákos, M.; Ștefănescu, D.; Zsidó, K.-E.; Fenyves, V. Thrown into Deep Water: Feedback on Student Satisfaction—A Case Study in Hungarian and Romanian Universities. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 36. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/1/36 (accessed on 11 January 2023). [CrossRef]
- An Innovative Higher Education Institution Training Toolbox to EffeCtively AddRess the EUropean InduStry 4.0 Skills Gap and Mismatches. Available online: https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/projects/search/details/2019-1-MT01-KA203-051265 (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- Google Drive: Results—IOs. Available online: https://www.um.edu.mt/l/1iQS6 (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- Energy Usage and Green Public Transportation in Future Smart Cities: An Innovative Teaching Program for Students, Stakeholders and Entrepreneurs. Available online: https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/projects/search/details/2020-1-TR01-KA203-094242 (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- Digital Innovation. Available online: https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/projects/search/details/2020-1-PL01-KA203-081891 (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- About—Digital Innovation. Available online: https://www.innovatingdigitally.eu/about/ (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- Benchmarking Tool—Digital Innovation. Available online: https://www.innovatingdigitally.eu/benchmarking-tool-en/ (accessed on 16 May 2023).
- Georgiev, G.P.; Titova, T.P.; Kosturkov, R.; Sikora, A.; Janevska, G.; Kostov, M.; Halunga, S.; Fratu, O. Education for Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Industries EREMI. In Proceedings of the 2022 57th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST), Ohrid, North Macedonia, 16–18 June 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Brudermann, T.; Aschemann, R.; Füllsack, M.; Posch, A. Education for Sustainable Development 4.0: Lessons Learned from the University of Graz, Austria. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- González-Pérez, L.I.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unger, M.; Polt, W. The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation—A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight STI Gov. 2017, 11, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akour, M.; Alenezi, M. Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Eurydice. In The European Higher Education Area in 2020: Bologna Process Implementation Report; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2020. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/756192 (accessed on 12 January 2023).
- The EREMI Project Team: The Quality Feedback Survey Online. Available online: https://bit.ly/eremisurvey (accessed on 13 June 2023).
Total | UKLO | UFT | UPB | HSO | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Questions | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
II Course Content (2. The course was well organised.) | 4.67 | 0.58 | 4.75 | 0.44 | 4.64 | 0.50 | 4.65 | 0.67 | 4.83 | 0.41 |
II Course Content (3. The teaching materials present the learning content in a suitable way.) | 4.65 | 0.59 | 4.88 | 0.34 | 4.73 | 0.47 | 4.58 | 0.68 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
II Course Content (4. The learning materials were clear and well-written.) | 4.59 | 0.62 | 4.79 | 0.41 | 4.45 | 0.52 | 4.56 | 0.71 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
II Course Content (5. The course seems to be professionally designed.) | 4.53 | 0.66 | 4.42 | 0.50 | 4.00 | 0.77 | 4.63 | 0.67 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
II Course Content (6. The course actively involves me in the learning process.) | 4.45 | 0.73 | 4.46 | 0.72 | 4.64 | 0.50 | 4.46 | 0.78 | 4.17 | 0.75 |
II Course Content (7. The readings were appropriate to the goals of course.) | 4.56 | 0.71 | 4.71 | 0.46 | 4.36 | 1.21 | 4.58 | 0.71 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
II Course Content (8. The provided content gives an overall picture.) | 4.62 | 0.65 | 4.58 | 0.50 | 4.73 | 0.47 | 4.58 | 0.75 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
II Course Content (9. The length of the course was appropriate to cover content.) | 4.52 | 0.67 | 4.42 | 0.65 | 4.82 | 0.40 | 4.54 | 0.73 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
II Course Content (10. The content addresses existing problems.) | 4.40 | 0.99 | 4.67 | 0.48 | 4.55 | 0.52 | 4.23 | 1.23 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
III Learning Outcomes (11. This course helped me develop intellectual skills (e.g., critical or creative thinking, quantitative reasoning, problem solving, etc.).) | 4.44 | 0.67 | 4.42 | 0.58 | 4.36 | 0.81 | 4.51 | 0.68 | 4.00 | 0.63 |
III Learning Outcomes (12. This course helped me develop professional skills (e.g., written or oral communication, computer literacy, teamwork, etc.).) | 4.47 | 0.63 | 4.46 | 0.51 | 4.45 | 0.69 | 4.51 | 0.68 | 4.33 | 0.52 |
III Learning Outcomes (13. The course improves my understanding of the topic.) | 4.67 | 0.51 | 4.71 | 0.46 | 4.73 | 0.47 | 4.63 | 0.56 | 4.83 | 0.41 |
III Learning Outcomes (14. The course gave me the confidence to do more advanced work in the subject.) | 4.56 | 0.57 | 4.63 | 0.49 | 4.82 | 0.40 | 4.54 | 0.63 | 4.33 | 0.52 |
IV Overall (15. I would recommend this course to others.) | 4.64 | 0.52 | 4.83 | 0.38 | 4.82 | 0.40 | 4.58 | 0.57 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
IV Overall (16. The course was helpful in progress toward my degree.) | 4.62 | 0.55 | 4.79 | 0.51 | 4.82 | 0.40 | 4.56 | 0.57 | 4.33 | 0.52 |
IV Overall (17. Overall, this course stimulated my interest in this subject.) | 4.69 | 0.46 | 4.75 | 0.44 | 4.73 | 0.47 | 4.67 | 0.48 | 4.67 | 0.52 |
IV Overall (18. Overall, this course met my expectations for the quality of the course) | 4.75 | 0.46 | 4.79 | 0.41 | 4.91 | 0.30 | 4.74 | 0.48 | 4.50 | 0.55 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sikora, A.; Titova-Kosturkova, T.; Janevska, G.; Kostov, M.; Halunga, S.; Suciu, G.; Georgiev, G. EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310244
Sikora A, Titova-Kosturkova T, Janevska G, Kostov M, Halunga S, Suciu G, Georgiev G. EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments. Sustainability. 2023; 15(13):10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310244
Chicago/Turabian StyleSikora, Axel, Tanya Titova-Kosturkova, Gordana Janevska, Mitko Kostov, Simona Halunga, George Suciu, and Georgi Georgiev. 2023. "EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments" Sustainability 15, no. 13: 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310244
APA StyleSikora, A., Titova-Kosturkova, T., Janevska, G., Kostov, M., Halunga, S., Suciu, G., & Georgiev, G. (2023). EREMI: An Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Higher Education in Resource Efficient Manufacturing Environments. Sustainability, 15(13), 10244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310244