The Effects of Physical Education on Preschoolers’ Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Approach to the Problem
2.2. Information Sources
2.3. Search Strategy
(preschool* OR pre-school* OR kindergarten) AND (psychomotricity OR “physical education”) AND (emotion* OR “intrapersonal skills” OR “interpersonal skills” OR “adaptation skills”)
2.4. Eligibility Criteria
2.5. Data Extraction
2.6. Assessment of Study Methodology
2.7. Extracted Information and Variables of Interest
3. Results
3.1. Identification and Selection of Studies
3.2. Quality Assessment
3.3. Study Characteristics
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- An increment in physical activity hours at preschool could positively influence the emotional competence of children.
- Dynamic psychomotricity may be more effective than normative psychomotricity for the development of emotional competence. Therefore, teachers could program physical education classes in preschool using a non-directed methodology, leading children to perform spontaneous action and play in order to promote psychomotor expressiveness. In addition, lacking fixed programmed activities, teacher could program the progression in their classes focusing on the distribution of spaces, materials, and proposals adjusted to the group of children and their relationship with the curricular contents. This suggestion should be followed, at least, until future investigations support the suitability of other methodologies for improving EI.
- The application of some intervention programs has a positive influence on the emotional competence of preschool children, at least with the number of sessions to which the children were subjected. Therefore, teachers may follow: (i) the TPSR model to promote socio-emotional learning, (ii) the psychomotor education program to an effective level, and (iii) the psychomotor training program for the development of emotional competence in children with developmental delays.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fernández-Berrocal, P.; Ruiz Aranda, D. La Inteligencia emocional en la Educación. EJREP 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayer, J.D.; Salovey, P. What is emotional intelligence? In Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
- Goleman, D. La Inteligencia Emocional; Javier Vergara: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Salovey, P.; Mayer, J.D. Emotional Intelligence. Imagin. Cogn. Personal. 1990, 9, 185–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goleman, D. Emotional Intelligence; Bantam Books: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Bar-On, R. Emotional and Social Intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory. In The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace; Jossey Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Vivas, M.; Gallego, D. Belkis González Educar las Emociones; Dykison: Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Jara León, H. Técnica psicomotriz y la inteligencia emocional de los infantes de dos años de la institución educativa privada Rafael Narváez Cadenillas de Trujillo –Perú, 2016. Rev. Cienc. Hum. Soc. 2018, 34, 884–904. [Google Scholar]
- Rico-González, M. Developing Emotional Intelligence through Physical Education: A Systematic Review. Percept Mot Ski. 2023, 130, 3151252311651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castillo-Viera, E.; Moreno-Sánchez, E.; Tornero-Quiñones, I.; Sáez-Padilla, J. Development of Emotional Intelligence through Dramatisation. Apunts 2020, 143, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, A.V. Avances de Investigación En Salud a Lo Largo Del Ciclo Vital. AUNIVEP. 2018, 2, 275–282. [Google Scholar]
- Gershon, P.; Pellitteri, J. Promoting Emotional Intelligence in Preschool Education: A Review of Programs. J. Emot. Educ. 2018, 10, 26–41. [Google Scholar]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rico-González, M.; Pino-Ortega, J.; Clemente, F.M.; Los Arcos, A. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Reviews in Sports Science. Biol. Sport 2022, 39, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- C.C.C.R. Group. Data Extraction Template for Included Studies. Available online: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fcccrg.cochrane.org%2Fsites%2Fcccrg.cochrane.org%2FfiFfi%2Fpublic%2Fuploads%2Fdet_2015_revised_final_june_20_2016_nov_29_revised.doc (accessed on 20 May 2023).
- Slim, K.; Nini, E.; Forestier, D.; Kwiatkowski, F.; Panis, Y.; Chipponi, J. Original Article Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (Minors). ANZ J. Surg. 2003, 73, 712–716. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C. The Role of Physical Activity Promoting Thinking Skills and Emotional Behavior of Preschool Children. Psicol. Refl. Crít. 2022, 35, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pavão, I.; Santos, F.; Wright, P.M.; Gonçalves, F. Implementing the Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model within Preschool Education: Strengths, Challenges and Strategies. Curric. Stud. Health Phys. Educ. 2019, 10, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferre-Rey, G.; Dueñas, J.M.; Camps, C. Diferencias entre la psicomotricidad dinámica y normativa en el desarrollo infantil. RIMCAFD 2021, 21, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amigo, R.; Garaigordobil, M. Inteligencia: Diferencias de género y relaciones con factores psicomotrices, conductuales y emocionales en niños de 5 años. Interdiscip. Rev. Psicol. Cienc. Afines 2010, 27, 229–245. [Google Scholar]
- Mulvey, K.L.; Miedema, S.T.; Stribing, A.; Gilbert, E.; Brian, A. SKIPing Together: A Motor Competence Intervention Promotes Gender-Integrated Friendships for Young Children. Sex Roles 2020, 82, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; So, W.-Y.; Choi, E.-J. The Effects of a Psychomotor Training Program on Physical Coordination in Children with Development Delay. Iran. J. Public Health 2017, 46, 860–862. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lupu, E. The Role of Motric Activities in the Psycho-Motric Development of Preschool Children—Future Pupils. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 12, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
No | Item | Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Population | Children from preschool or kindergartens. | Children who do not attend preschool or kindergartens. |
2 | Intervention or Exposure | Preschool children participating in physical education sessions. | Children not participating in physical education classes. |
3 | Comparation | Any comparation is valid. | |
4 | Outcome[s] | Articles that contemplate results in population related to emotions. | Articles that do not contemplate results in population related to emotions. |
5 | Other criteria | Peer reviewed, original, full-text studies written in English or Spanish. | Written in another language or non-peer reviewed original full-text studies. |
Reference | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINORS | |||||||||||||
Wang [17] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 16/18 |
Pavão et al. [18] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 16/18 |
PEDro Scale | |||||||||||||
Ferre-Rey et al. [19] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 8/10 |
Amigo and Garaigordobil [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 10/10 |
Mulvey et al. [21] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 8/10 |
Kim et al. [22] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 8/10 |
Reference | Sample | Aim | Program | Extracted Outcomes | Highlights | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups (If Any) Differences | Program | Program’s Main Ideas | Duration | EI Assessment | Results | ||||
Ferre-Rey et al. [19] | No. children: 75 Country: Spain Mean age: 3–5 years | The aim of this study was to establish significant differences between both currents of psychomotricity in terms of emotional level | EXP Dynamic psychomotricity | Two preschool groups were selected with two different psychomotor practice methodologies: one with the dynamic methodology and another with the normative type. | Regarding normative psychomotricity, the sessions should be directed where learning is acquired through exercises, games or activities that have been previously planned and organized. Dynamic psychomotricity is based on the idea that the session should not be directed; rather, it should be given from the child’s spontaneous action and play, in order to promote psychomotor expressiveness. In this way, there are no fixed programmed activities, but there is planning on the distribution of spaces, materials, and proposals, adjusted to the group of children and their relationship with the curricular contents. | ND | Test of the human figure | Significant differences have been found in favor of the dynamic psychomotor group over the normative psychomotor group. | In conclusion, the data from this study suggest that dynamic psychomotor practice provides possible benefits on an emotional level. |
CON Normative psychomotricity | |||||||||
Mulvey et al. [21] | No. children: 93 Mean age: ND | The current study tested whether an intervention promotes gender-integrated friendships in preschool-aged children. | CON Free-play | SKIP | The SKIP intervention replaces free play only 2 days a week, which allows children the other 3 days a week to practice the motor skills they are learning in free play settings with boys and girls. During the SKIP intervention, children develop an array of motor skills (run, jump, leap, hop, gallop, slide, throw, catch, kick, dribble, strike, and roll) through group-based activities. | Two classes a week (10 weeks) | Gender-integrated related questions | Results documented that child (Mage = 47.38, SD = 6.21 months, range = 36.67–60.25 months) assigned to the SKIP condition (n= 56) as compared to a control free-play condition (n= 37) were more likely to report gender-integrated friendships post intervention. Growth in girls’ reports of gender-integrated friendships drove the intervention effect on gender-integrated friendships. | In conclusion, young girls report more gender-integrated friendships following a motor competence intervention. |
EXP SKIP | |||||||||
Kim et al. [22] | No. children: 15 boys Country: Seoul Mean age: 5–7 years | The aim of this study was to inculcate confidence in children | EXP (n = 8) Psychomotor training program | Psychomotor training program | The psychomotor training program aims to inculcate confidence in children by making them participate voluntarily in various physical, material, and social experiences. This study applied basal fitness, obstacle running, and prop play | Two classes a week (12 weeks) | Körperkoordinationstest für Kinder test | The results are that the psychomotor training program brought about a significant change in the children with developmental delay in the EXP. | The program seems suitable to foster confidence in children. |
CON (n = 7) | |||||||||
Amigo and Garaigordobil [20] | No. children: 74 Country: Spain Mean age: 5 years | The objectives of this study was to analyze the relationship between intelligence and self-concept, psychomotricity, variables, and behavioral and emotional factors. | - | Descriptive, comparative, and correlational methodology | This program seeks to establish concomitant relationships of intelligence with self-concept, psychomotor skills, and behavioral and emotional factors. | 10 sessions of 4 h each | K-BIT, BASC, EPP, MSCA, EA, DFH | Pearson’s correlation coefficients have highlighted positive relationships of total intelligence with self-concept, with some psychomotor functions (coordination, body schema) and with emotional stability. | The development of some basic motor functions could help in emotional stability. |
Wang [17] | No. children: 366 Country: China Mean age: 5–6 years | The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between physical education and social and emotional development of preschool children. | Additional physical education and fitness classes | Children took part in rhythmic and physical education classes. Rhythmic exercises included dancing or a series of isolated simple dance and gymnastic movements aimed at developing a sense of rhythm, increasing coordination and accuracy of orientation in space. | 3 months | A questionnaire containing 33 questions: Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional Cornell Critical Thinking Test | As a result of the study, the main regularities of the influence of physical education on social and emotional behavior of children were established. It was determined that there is a positive correlation between age, physical education, and social-emotional behavior. | The results can be applied to programs for the prevention of psychosocial and social-emotional developmental delays of children in kindergartens. | |
Pavão et al. [18] | No. children: 24 Country: Portugal Mean age: 5 years | The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of a program leader, a TPSR-based program in a preschool setting. | TPSR program | 1. Promoting awareness (sharing the responsibility goals of the physical education session). 2. Physical activity (sharing the levels of responsibility within the motor skills developed during the physical education session). 3. Group connections (discussing the positive and negative results of participating in the task and guiding the children through the activity). 4. Time for reflection (how the responsibility goals were achieved during the session). | 4 months One class once a week (30 min) | Notes and daily reflection | The results suggest that the TPSR model could be adapted and applied with preschool children. | In summary, this study provided an innovative understanding of how TPSR can be implemented in a preschool context to promote social and emotional learning and improve school readiness. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gil-Moreno, J.; Rico-González, M. The Effects of Physical Education on Preschoolers’ Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310632
Gil-Moreno J, Rico-González M. The Effects of Physical Education on Preschoolers’ Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(13):10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310632
Chicago/Turabian StyleGil-Moreno, Janire, and Markel Rico-González. 2023. "The Effects of Physical Education on Preschoolers’ Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 15, no. 13: 10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310632
APA StyleGil-Moreno, J., & Rico-González, M. (2023). The Effects of Physical Education on Preschoolers’ Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(13), 10632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310632