A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Review of Today’s Trading Platforms Related to the Reverse Manufacturing Process
3. Gap Analysis
3.1. Business Model
3.2. Product Display
3.3. Delivery Products
3.4. Quality Assurance and After-Sales Service
3.5. Product Review and Star Rate
3.6. Transaction and Payment
- (1)
- The buyer submits the order.
- (2)
- The buyer makes the payment, and the payment is kept by the platform.
- (3)
- The seller delivers the goods.
- (4)
- The buyer receives the goods.
- (5)
- The platform pays the payment to the seller.
- (6)
- The evaluation of the buyer.
3.7. Features of the New Remanufacturing Trading Platform
4. Consortium Blockchain-Based Remanufacturing Trading Platform
4.1. Categories of Blockchain
4.2. Consortium Blockchain-Based Technology Framework for Remanufacturing Trading Platforms
4.3. Consortium Blockchain-Based Remanufacturing Trading Platform Model
4.4. The Coupling Mechanism of the Consortium Blockchain and Remanufacturing Trading Platform Construction
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Reviewed the Remanufacturing Trading Platforms
References
- Xu, B. Green remanufacturing engineering and its development strategy in China. Front. Eng. Manag. 2016, 3, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casalin, F.; Dia, E. Information and reputation mechanisms in auctions of remanufactured goods. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2019, 63, 185–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quariguasi, J.; Neto, F.; Bloemhof, J.; Corbett, C. Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 171, 371–380. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Zeng, S.; He, Y.; Corbett, C. The influence of e-services on customer online purchasing behavior toward remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 187, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, K.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J. Should firms provide online return service for remanufactured products? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 272, 122641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Dan, T.; Bolin, W. Use of a product service system in a competing remanufacturing market. Omega 2021, 102, 102387. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, X.; Wei, L. Research on the Pricing Strategy of “Internet plus” Recycling Platforms in a Two-Sided Network Environment. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsan-Ming, C.; Tana, S. Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework. Transp. Res. Part E 2022, 160, 102653. [Google Scholar]
- Colomo-Palacios, R.; Sanchez-Gordon, M.; Arias-Aranda, D. A critical review on blockchain assessment initiatives: A technology evolution viewpoint. J. Softw. Evol. Process 2020, 32, 2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, A.Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, Y. A Supply-chain System Framework Based on Internet of Things Using Blockchain Technology. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2021, 1, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuangyin, L.; Moyixi, L.; Lu, W. Overview of key technologies and existing problems of blockchain. Comput. Eng. Appl. 2022, 58, 66–82. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yang, L. Blockchain and the related issues: A review of current research topics. J. Manag. Anal. 2018, 5, 231–255. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, J.; Chen, J. Framework of Blockchain-Supported E-Commerce Platform for Small and Medium Enterprises. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amir Latif, R.; Hussain, K. A remix IDE: Smart contract-based framework for the healthcare sector by using Blockchain technology. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022, 81, 26609–26632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsan-Ming, C.; Xin, W.; Xuting, S. The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 127, 178–191. [Google Scholar]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 7, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, Q.; Wang, H.; Pei, X. Food safety traceability system based on blockchain and EPCIS. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20698–20707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babich, V.; Hilary, G. OM Forum—Distributed ledgers and operations: What operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2020, 22, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Orji, I.; Kusi-Sarpong, S.; Huang, S. Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 141, 102025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouhizadeh, M.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain and the circular economy: Potential tensions and critical reflections from practice. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 950–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung-Shan, Y. Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 131, 108–117. [Google Scholar]
- Zonggui, T.; Ray, Y.Z. A blockchain-based evaluation approach for customer delivery satisfaction in sustainable urban logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 2229–2249. [Google Scholar]
- Bin, S.; Xiaoyuan, X.; Quan, Y. Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 142, 102066. [Google Scholar]
- Manupati, V.; Schoenherr, T.; Ramkumar, M. A blockchain-based approach for a multi-echelon sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2222–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tozanlı, Ö.; Kongar, E.; Gupta, S. Trade-in-to-upgrade as a marketing strategy in disassembly-to-order systems at the edge of blockchain technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 7183–7200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelenburg, S.; Janssen, M.; Klievink, B. A blockchain architecture for reducing the bullwhip effect. In Proceedings of the Business Modeling and Software Design: 8th International Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 2–4 July 2018; pp. 69–82. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, Y.J.; Choi, T.M.; Zhang, J. Platform supported supply chain operations in the blockchain era: Supply contracting and moral hazards. Decis. Sci. 2021, 52, 866–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismanto, L.; Ar, H.S.; Fajar, A.N. Blockchain as E-commerce platform in Indonesia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1179, 012114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meimei, Z.; Xiaoqian, S.; Tangbin, X. Production and pricing decisions for new and remanufactured products with customer prejudice and accurate response. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 157, 107308. [Google Scholar]
- Cheol Woo, P.; Ian, S.; Seul Ki, L. Effects of online reviews, trust, and picture-superiority on intention to purchase restaurant services. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 47, 228–236. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y. The blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2019, 15, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, M.; Chen, Q.; Ma, X. MBFT: A new consensus algorithm for consortium blockchain. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 87665–87676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortes, G.S.; Gao, G.P.; Silva, F.B.; Song, Z. Unconventional monetary policy and disaster risk: Evidence from the subprime and COVID–19 crises. J. Int. Money Financ. 2022, 122, 102543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marthinsen, J.E.; Gordon, S.R. Hyperinflation, optimal currency scopes, and a cryptocurrency alternative to dollarization. Q. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2022, 85, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdagli, A.; Weber, M. Monetary Policy through Production Networks: Evidence from the Stock Market; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Ref. | Platforms | (a) Type | (b) Established Time | (c) Service Region |
---|---|---|---|---|
[1] | Amazon | Multi-product | In 1995 | The global |
[2] | ASM Auto Recycling | Auto recycling | In 1986 | The UK |
[3] | Beijing Scrap Car Disintegration | Auto recycling | in 1998 | China |
[4] | Bejing Xianglong Borui | Auto recycling | In 2010 | China |
[5] | CAGDS | Vehicle recycling data management | In 2013 | China |
[6] | Callparts | Auto recycling | In 1997 | Germany |
[7] | Cambridge Car Solutions | Auto recycling | In 2014 | The UK |
[8] | CAMDS | Vehicle recycling data management | In 2009 | China |
[9] | CEX | Specialized remanufactured products | In 1992 | The global |
[10] | Chaichejian | Automobile parts recycling | In 2006 | China |
[11] | eBay | Multi-product | In 1995 | The global |
[12] | ELVS | Auto recycling | In 2000 | The USA |
[13] | Gigarefurb | Specialized remanufactured products | In 2013 | The UK |
[14] | IDIS | Vehicle recycling data management | In the mid-1990s | The global |
[15] | IMDS | Vehicle recycling data management | In 2000 | The global |
[16] | JD | Multi-product | In1998 | China |
[17] | Lianxin | Auto recycling | In 2019 | China |
[18] | Remanshop | Specialized remanufactured products | In 2017 | China |
[19] | Shouchezhan | Auto recycling | In 2016 | China |
[20] | Taobao | Multi-product | In 2003 | China |
Platforms | Business Model | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G1.1 The market lacks a professional remanufacturing trading platform G1.2 The customer group determines the business mod |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Platforms | Product Display | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G2.1 Product presentation in line with customers’ habits G2.2 Effective communication |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Platforms | Delivery Products | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G3.1 Self-run logistics and third-party logistics |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Platforms | Quality Assurance and After-Sales Service | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G4.1 Provide a long warranty G4.2 Return and exchange time |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Platforms | Product Review and Star Rate | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G5.1 Different evaluation indicators G5.2 The impact of the evaluation results |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Platforms | Transaction and Payment | Gaps |
---|---|---|
Amazon |
| G6.1 Special transaction process G6.2 A variety of payment methods |
eBay |
| |
Remanshop |
| |
Gigarefurb |
| |
CEX |
| |
Taobao |
| |
JD |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Feng, Z.; Li, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X. A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612120
Feng Z, Li W, Zhang H, Zhang X. A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis. Sustainability. 2023; 15(16):12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612120
Chicago/Turabian StyleFeng, Zhaohui, Wei Li, Hua Zhang, and Xumei Zhang. 2023. "A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis" Sustainability 15, no. 16: 12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612120
APA StyleFeng, Z., Li, W., Zhang, H., & Zhang, X. (2023). A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis. Sustainability, 15(16), 12120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612120