Next Article in Journal
Climate Change Exposure and Firm Performance: Does Managerial Ability Matter?
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Investigation and Proposal of Artificial Neural Network Models of Lead and Cadmium Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Water Using Porous Nanomaterials
Previous Article in Journal
Recovery for Resilience: The Mediating Role of Work–Life Balance on the Quality of Life of Women Employees
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removal of Malachite Green Using Hydrochar from PALM Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Application of Ultrasonic Waves in the Pretreatment of Biological Sludge in Urban Sewage and Proposing an Artificial Neural Network Predictive Model of Concentration

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61411, Saudi Arabia
2
Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 122 NH, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
3
School of Computing, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
5
School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
6
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Diyala, Baqubah 10047, Iraq
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(17), 12875; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712875
Submission received: 4 July 2023 / Revised: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 20 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023

Abstract

:
This research examines whether ultrasonic waves can enhance the hydrolysis, stability, and dewatering of activated sludge from raw urban wastewater. Sampling and physical examination of the activated sludge that was returned to the aeration pond were carried out using ultrasonic waves that were guided at frequencies of 30 and 50 kHz for periods of 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min. Various tests, including volatile suspended solids, inorganic solids, volatile solids, sludge resistant time, capillary suction time, total suspended solids, total solids, and volatile soluble solids, were carried out to advance further the processes of hydrolysis, stabilization, and dehydration of samples. According to the observations, the volatile soluble solids at a frequency of 30 kHz and t = 15 min were raised by 72%. The capillary suction time of 30 and 50 kHz in 1 min demonstrated a drop of 29 and 22%, respectively. It is crucial to consider that, at 10 min and the frequency of 50 kHz, the greatest efficiency was found. The 30 kHz and 1 min yielded the optimum sludge dewatering conditions. Finally, artificial neural networks (ANN) are utilized to propose predictive models for concentration, and the results were also very accurate ( M A E = 1.37 % ). Regarding the computational costs, the ANN took approximately 5% of the time spent on experiments.

1. Introduction

The municipal sewage sludge separated from sewage in the treatment process must be decontaminated and purified before reuse. Concentrating, settling, and dewatering are the most common sludge treatment processes [1]. These measures usually account for approximately half of the entire wastewater treatment expenses, requiring careful and specialized management. Stabilization is considered the most basic, expensive, and technical sludge treatment process [2,3,4]. Conventionally, stabilization is a procedure that dramatically decreases the sludge’s microbiological threats and organic material that is decomposing [5,6,7,8]. If it is possible to reduce the percentage of sludge water with some measures and then transfer it to the ground, using the properties of fertilizers and valuable compounds in the sludge, it is feasible to employ land remediation technologies to continue their purification process [9,10,11]. To a considerable extent, this can lower the cost of sludge treatment [12,13,14,15]. Sludges from wastewater treatment plants are often used as fertilizers or soil texture modifiers. It is possible to transfer sludge to the ground in liquid, paste, and dry form. In transporting liquid sludge, due to the large volume of water and the need for significant transmission networks (pipe laying or the use of tankers), it is usually uneconomical and not cost-effective [16,17,18,19]. Accordingly, the dewatering operation before removing the sludge from the treatment plant is often inescapable [20,21,22,23]. Based on the kind of primary or activated sludge, the water content in the sludge texture ranges from 96% to 99%, and the proportion of perishable organic matter is very high [24,25]. Urban sewage sludge, significantly activated sludge, often composed of biomass and microbial bodies, is very resistant to dehydration and hardly loses its water [26,27]. The water in activated sludge or biological sludge includes free water, the water between clots, water attached to the surface of flocs, and water in the body of living microbes (transplanted water). To remove water from these sludges, it is of great importance to release the free water between the clots [28,29]. Sludge treatment is a set of operations performed before the dewatering or sludge concentration stage so that the sludge dewatering and concentration work can be conducted easily [30,31]. Sludge treatment may be conducted by one of the following methods:
Thermal pretreatment, application of chemicals, mechanical decomposition of sludge, and ultrasonic waves [32,33,34]. Among the advantages of sludge pretreatment methods with ultrasound waves, the following can be mentioned:
The advantages of this model are it is possible for it to be added to the existing facilities, low cost, and proper operation compared to other pretreatment methods. Moreover, on-site production of carbon source for denitrification facilities, full automation of bulking control process caused by filamentous bacteria and foam in digesters, better digester stability, together with the improvement of volatile solid destruction and biogas production, advancement of sludge dewatering ability, improvement of sludge quality, reduction in organic biologically degradable substances, and decline in the number of pathogens in sludge are advantages as well [35,36,37]. The new findings confirm the increase in its use in the full-scale decomposition of urban sludge, the increase in its hydrolysis efficiency, and the improvement of the ability of biological decomposition of organic compounds of various wastewaters, including dairy industries, and its employment in improving the anaerobic digestion of activated sludge [38]. Considering the long retention time in the anaerobic process and the problems of sludge dewatering in treatment plants, there is a need to utilize procedures to alleviate or even eliminate the limitations and consequently decrease the operating and maintenance costs. Since they have the ability to minimize sludge particle size and promote enzyme activity, ultrasonic waves can speed up the hydrolysis procedure, which is the limiting factor in digesters, leading to a reduction in retention time [39,40].
This study presents a novel approach to enhance the hydrolysis, stability, and dewatering of activated sludge obtained from raw urban wastewater treatment processes. Unlike conventional methods such as thermal pretreatment, chemical application, and mechanical decomposition, our research explores the application of ultrasonic waves as an innovative and cost-effective technique. Ultrasonic waves offer several distinct advantages that set our approach apart. They can be seamlessly integrated into existing wastewater treatment facilities, requiring minimal modifications, and present a lower overall cost compared to more complex and resource-intensive methods. Moreover, our study addresses the limitations often encountered with other techniques, such as long retention times, by expediting the hydrolysis process, a critical factor in sludge stabilization. Through a series of experiments and comprehensive tests, we demonstrate that ultrasonic waves effectively improve the dewatering ability of activated sludge, contributing to the reduction in water content and enhancing overall sludge quality. These findings pave the way for more efficient and sustainable wastewater treatment processes.
A thorough comparison between our proposed approach and existing methods in sludge treatment reveals the distinctive attributes that make our study significant. While chemical applications and mechanical decomposition methods require the addition of costly agents or substantial mechanical energy, ultrasonic waves operate as a nonintrusive and energy-efficient alternative [41]. Thermal pretreatment, often characterized by high energy consumption, is replaced by our ultrasonic method that achieves comparable or even superior results [42]. Unlike other pretreatment techniques, ultrasonic waves exhibit the unique capability to reduce particle size, enhance enzyme activity, and improve sludge stability [43]. Moreover, our research addresses challenges related to the dewatering process, a crucial step in sludge management, by achieving optimal conditions for dewatering through controlled ultrasonic exposure. This aspect distinguishes our study from traditional approaches and underlines the potential of ultrasonic technology in revolutionizing the field of wastewater treatment. Through explicit comparisons and comprehensive analyses, we establish the originality and relevance of our study, contributing to the advancement of sustainable and efficient sludge treatment practices.
Research shows few studies have been conducted on the hydrolysis of raw biological sludge in ultrasonic reactors in sewage treatment facilities. Improving the conditions of stabilizing and dewatering sludge under the influence of ultrasonic waves in a short time while being innovative can make sludge control in sewage treatment facilities easier. The primary objective of the current study is to clarify how well ultrasonic waves may improve the stability and dewatering operations of activated sludge from municipal sewage. The utilization of machine-learning-based predictive models has become prevalent in many engineering problems [44,45,46,47]. However, this has not yet been happening in wastewater treatment research, so the present study also puts forward a predictive model using artificial neural networks (ANN), and the concentration is predicted using the ANN model.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is indeed operational research with the goal of determining how well ultrasonic waves function to improve the dewatering properties of raw urban sewage sludge under various frequency-related circumstances and residence time. The whole process was conducted in a laboratory environment using an ultrasonic device. In this research, at first, by applying ultrasonic waves, the water in the activated sludge was released. The state of hydrolysis and stabilization was determined, respectively, by conducting experiments evaluating volatile solids (VS), volatile soluble solids (VSSOL), and volatile suspended solids (VSSS); additionally, sludge dewatering property by conducting tests of total solids (TS), total suspended solids (TSS), capillary suction time (CST), and sludge resistant time (SRT) was elucidated. In order to obtain reasonable results, the experiments were repeated three times. Finally, the results were analyzed employing SPSS software. The optimal ultrasonic option was determined regarding the frequency and time required for hydrolysis, stabilization, and dewatering of raw biological sludge. TS, TSS, organic solids (VS), inorganic solids (nVS), VS, and VSSOL tests were performed based on procedures presented in the standard method book [48] and, to determine the CST of sludge samples, 5 mL of sludge was taken from a funnel with a diameter of 5 mm and poured onto filter paper. The time taken to wet the filter paper, which ranged from 1 to 3 cm, was measured and reported in seconds [49]. The CST values for untreated municipal sewage sludge are around 200 s or more; for treated sludge, the mentioned value reaches 10 s or less [50]. The dewatering rate of treated sludge was evaluated using a vacuum filtering process. The sample was held under a consistent vacuum pressure of 34 kPa for 20 min using this approach, which involved pouring 100 mL of the treated sludge sample into a typical Buchner funnel outfitted with wet filter paper. In order to determine the specific resistance of sludge (SRF), the volume of filtered water and the filtration time are recorded. With a related volume–time diagram, the value of SRF is determined [51]. SRF values of municipal sewage sludge for treated and digested sludge are between 3 × 10 11 and 40 × 10 11   m / k g and, for primary sludge, the values are 1.5 × 10 14 to 5 × 10 14   m / k g [52]. The specific resistance of sludge is calculated from the following equation:
S R F = 2 P b A 2 μ C
in which SRF is the specific resistance of sludge ( m / k g ), C is the mass of solids per unit volume of filtered water ( k g / m 3 ), A is the filter surface ( m 2 ), P is the test pressure ( N / m 2 ), μ is the dynamic viscosity ( N · s / m 2 ), V is the volume of water collected in time (t), ( m 3 ), t is the time from the start of the test and application of suction (s), and b is the slope ( s / m 6 ). b is the slope of a line whose horizontal axis is the volume of water collected per time unit (t) in cubic meters, and its vertical axis is the result of division ( t / V ). At the same pressure and temperature and equal filter surface, the higher the slope of this line indicates that the time required to filter a certain amount of water from the sludge is more prolonged. Therefore, it is more difficult to extract water from the sludge. In this case, the specific resistance of the sludge is higher. In various conditions, the increase in this parameter means that either a higher pressure is needed to filter the sludge or a larger surface is required for this purpose, both of which suggest that the sludge’s resistance is more elevated and dewatering from the sludge becomes harder [53].

3. Results

The effect of ultrasonic waves on the appearance and structure of sludge under normal conditions and after the application of ultrasonic waves for 1.5 min and 2 min is shown in Figure 1. As can be seen, the stability circumstances, distribution, and balance of suspended materials in the sludge have been altered by the utilization of ultrasonic waves. Likewise, it has affected the ability to settle and concentrate the sludge.

3.1. The Solubilization of Organic Solids under the Influence of Ultrasonic Waves

The trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids at the frequency of 30 kHz is shown in Figure 2. The results indicate a comprehensive view of how these components evolve over time. Specifically, the dissolved organic solids exhibit noteworthy behavior. They demonstrated an initial rapid increase of 72% from the commencement of the experiment until the 15 min mark. However, intriguingly, with the prolongation of ultrasonic exposure to 30 min, there was a substantial decline of 37% in comparison to the levels observed at the 15 min interval. This pattern of behavior in dissolved organic solids is consistent with findings from [54], which similarly exhibited a comparable trend in response to varying ultrasonic exposure durations. This alignment across studies lends further credibility to the observed dynamics in the dissolved organic solids component.
The trend of total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids at 50 kHz frequency is shown in Figure 3. The results show that the dissolved organic solids increased from the beginning of the experiment to 10 min (99%). With the increment of ultrasonic time up to 30 min, it decreased by 49% compared to 10 min. Investigations show that the increase in dissolved organic solids from the beginning to 15 and 10 min at frequencies of 30 and 50 kHz, respectively, is a result of sludge floc disintegration and particle size reduction, which raises the number of dissolved solids [55]. A similar trend is observed in the research of Yang et al. [56].

3.2. Stability of Organic Solids under the Impact of Ultrasonic Waves

The changing trend of total solids, organic solids, and mineral solids at 30 kHz frequency is shown in Figure 4. The results show that the total and organic solids remained constant from the beginning of the experiment for 15 min. With the increase in ultrasonic time up to 30 min, TS and VS decreased by 9.4 and 17.9%, respectively.
The trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, and mineral solids at 50 kHz frequency is shown in Figure 5. The results show that the total and organic solids are constant from the beginning of the experiment up to 10 min. With the increment of ultrasonic time up to 30 min, the TS and VS have declined by 14 and 24%, respectively.
Investigations show that the reduction in dissolved organic solids in the ultrasonic time of 10 min and 15 min until the end of the experiment at the frequency of 30 kHz, respectively, indicates the beginning of the stabilization phase, which has also led to the reduction in organic solids. Corroborating these findings, the study referenced as [57] also observed a comparable trend regarding the influence of frequency and ultrasonic exposure time on the reduction in dissolved organic solids.

3.3. The Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Sludge-Specific Resistance and Capillary Suction Time

The trend of changes in sludge-specific resistance at frequencies of 30 and 50 kHz is shown in Figure 6. The results show that the specific resistance of the sludge at two different frequency values of 30 and 50 kHz has a downward trend at the beginning and reaches the lowest value at the time of 1 min (26% and 21% reduction in comparison with the initial sample, respectively). With the increment of ultrasonic time, an upward trend for sludge-specific resistance was observed and, at the time of 15 min, reached the highest value (an increase of 66% and 49%, respectively), which will continue to reduce the specific resistance of the sludge until 30 min. However, the corresponding value did not reach the initial value until the end of the experiment.
The trend of capillary suction time changes at frequency values of 30 and 50 kHz is depicted in Figure 7. The results show that the time related to the capillary suction at two frequency values of 30 and 50 kHz has a downward trend at the beginning and reaches the lowest value at the time of 1 min (29% and 22% decline compared to the initial sample, respectively). With the increment of ultrasonic time, the trend of increasing the sludge-specific resistance is observed and, at the time of 15 min, it reached the highest value of enhancement of 33% and 29%. Continuing again, we will have the process of reducing capillary suction time; however, the corresponding value did not reach the initial value until the end of the experiment. Studies show that, when ultrasound waves propagate between water, gas, and steam, they produce bubbles and fall with great intensity and speed [58]. This phenomenon, known as acoustic cavitation, creates a unique chemical environment with a temperature higher than 5000 K and pressure exceeding 10 8 Pa [53,58]; reactive hydroxyl radicals are generated due to the thermal decomposition of water molecules in the bubbles. High-frequency treatments have been implicated in the potential hydrolysis of water molecules, leading to the generation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH). This intriguing phenomenon involves the disruption of water molecules by the high-frequency energy, which can break apart the molecular bonds, resulting in the release of hydroxyl radicals [59]. These hydroxyl radicals are highly reactive and possess potent oxidative capabilities. The process starts with the energy from the high-frequency waves being absorbed by the water molecules present in the system. This energy absorption can cause the water molecules to undergo dissociation, leading to the formation of hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen ions [60]. The hydroxyl radicals generated in this manner are known for their strong oxidizing nature, making them capable of initiating various chemical reactions, including the degradation of organic compounds. Hydroxyl radicals (·OH) are considered highly reactive because they have an unpaired electron, which makes them extremely eager to react with other molecules in their vicinity [61]. These radicals can oxidize organic molecules by abstracting hydrogen atoms from them, ultimately leading to the breakdown of complex organic compounds into simpler, more soluble forms. This feature of ultrasonic waves can change the dewatering properties of sludge and, as a result, increase the decomposition rate of organic pollutants [62]. The generation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) through high-frequency treatments can enhance the dewatering properties of sludge by breaking down complex organic compounds, reducing viscosity, improving water separation, lowering surface tension, promoting efficient settling, and forming more porous solid cakes. These effects can lead to improved water drainage, faster solid–liquid separation, and enhanced cake formation. However, careful consideration is needed to avoid excessive oxidation that could negatively impact the desired treatment outcomes [63].

3.4. Investigating the Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Waves in Changing the Appearance and Structure of Sludge

Contact with ultrasonic waves for up to 30 s destroys larger flocs. Increasing the contact time by up to 1 min improves water separation from the raw activated sludge tissue and makes the sludge more biphasic [64]. In the continuation of the application of waves, it destroys the cellular tissue of microorganisms, which destroys the membrane cells, and increased turbidity in the supernatant and monophasic sludge can be seen. Ultrasonic waves increase the dewatering ability of sludge by creating ruptures in the sludge [65]. Figure 8 shows the SEM, which illustrates how ultrasonic vibrations impact the structure of sludge flocs at contact times of 2, 10, and 30 min compared to the sample at 0 s. The results demonstrate how ultrasonic time influences the separation of the sludge flocs, which leads the particle size to decrease [12]. The changes in the appearance of the sludge flakes in this study are consistent with the SEM images of the ultrasonically treated sludge presented in Paul et al.’s research [12].

4. Discussion

4.1. Examining How Well Ultrasonic Vibrations Function in the Hydrolysis of Organic Solids

The reduction in soluble organic solids in different ultrasonic times of 10 and 15 min until the end of the experiment, respectively, at the frequency of 30 and 50 kHz demonstrates the increase in the hydrolysis of organic solids and the beginning and stabilization stage, which further leads to the reduction in organic solids. The study conducted by Bougrier et al. [66] on the solubilization of biologically active sludge by ultrasonication showed that solid solubilization could be achieved with a contact time of more than 7 min. The study by Nickel et al. [67] indicated that treatment of raw activated sludge led to the hydrolysis of organic solids by 20 to 45%, which is inconsistent with the results obtained in the present research. In general, the findings of this investigation revealed that the ultrasonic times of 10 and 15 min at the frequency of 30 and 50 kHz, respectively, caused a portion of the sludge’s organic constituents to become soluble, but the ultrasonic waves with the frequency of 50 kHz in a short time of 10 min in addition to higher efficiency, 93% compared to 72%, is a suitable option for the degradation of organic solids in untreated biological sludge. Kargar et al.’s [68] study showed that ultrasonic waves reduce the volatile solids of the sludge exiting the anaerobic digester by 39.7% at a frequency of 35 kHz. Reducing the total solids and increasing the nonbiodegradable part at two frequencies of 30 and 50 kHz confirms the sludge stabilization process and the production of carbon dioxide and water [69]. The study conducted by Zhang et al. [70] indicated that ultrasonic waves with higher frequency are more effective in removing organic solids from sludge, which is in remarkable agreement with the results obtained in the current study. The present study’s findings demonstrated that ultrasonic waves at a frequency of 50 kHz with an irradiation duration of more than 10 min are a good option for stabilizing organic solids in raw biological sludge. However, achieving the standard of 38% of organic solids removal requires more ultrasonic times [71].

4.2. Investigating the Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Waves in Improving the Dewatering Properties of Sludge

Studies show that sludge treatment with ultrasonic waves initially separates the interstitial water of the sludge. However, with an excessive decomposition of the sludge, the sludge flocs are destroyed to a large extent and very fine particles with a high negative surface charge are produced [72,73]. As a result, a large number of extracellular polymers are released into the sludge supernatant, boosting viscosity. An excessive increment in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) destroys sludge dewatering, which increases CST and SRF until 15 min has been reached [74]. Feng et al.’s study [75] shows that the effect of ultrasonic waves on activated sludge includes two stages. In the first stage of the ultrasonic device, in specific energy conditions, up to 1000 kJ/kg TS provided at the time of 10 s, a small amount of the floc structure has been destroyed [76]. However, sludge settling improves in the second stage of degradation and solubilization at doses higher than 5000 kJ/kg TS and a time longer than 50 s. This leads to a decrease in sludge settling ability because of a reduction in particle size and an increase in EPS content. The results of the research conducted at the Hamburg University of Technology [77] accepted the minimum optimal contact time for the pretreatment of raw activated sludge with ultrasonic waves from 30 to 90 s, which is consistent with current research results. The results of Heidari et al.’s [39] research also showed that increasing the ultrasonic frequency and time by more than 3 min raises the amount of SRF in untreated activated sludge, which is consistent with the changes in the specific resistance of the sludge in the present study. Capillary suction time in contact time greater than 15 min is attributed to the completion of the solubilization process of all suspended solids and the beginning of sludge stabilization [78]. Lifka et al.’s [79] study of using ultrasonics to destroy water pollution shows that increasing the ultrasonic time leads to stabilizing organic sludge materials.

4.3. Artificial Neural Network

Using artificial neural networks (ANN), it is possible to predict important parameters in problems. Since this method can understand the complexity of physical issues, they are used in predicting complex flows. For instance, the present research predicts concentration in different situations using the ANN algorithm. Using the experimental results, we have trained a model. The performance of the model is evaluated using two widely used parameters, namely mean absolute error and R 2 . In order to adjust the model, the contributing factors in the ANN model are tuned using a procedure called hyperparameter tuning [46,80,81,82,83]. Table 1 presents the model specifications. The model includes three kinds of layers, and the inputs are SRF, frequency, and time. The desired parameter, which is predicted, is concentration. The number of data points is 126, so 88 data points are used for training the model. The rest of the data points (38) are used for testing the model’s performance. The employed ratio for splitting the dataset is 0.7–0.3. Based on the results of Table 1, the number of epochs is 35,000 and the batch size is 4. To prevent overfitting, regularization techniques and dropouts were integrated into the ANN architecture. Regularization involves adding a penalty term to the loss function during training, discouraging the model from assigning excessive importance to specific features. In the present study, we utilized L2 regularization, which imposes constraints on squared values of the model’s weights. Also, in order to further prevent overfitting, dropouts were utilized in some hidden layers. These techniques help prevent the model from overfitting on certain features and enhance its ability to generalize to new data [84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91].
Figure 9 shows the results of the prediction of the ANN model. As can be seen, the results of the model are very accurate. The MAE of the model is 1.37% and the R-squared of the model is 0.98. It should be noted that comparing the required time for the experiments and the ANN model shows how advanced and accurate the machine-learning-based models are. It is concluded that the required time for the simulation of the model in Python is 5% of the experiments. Considering the accuracy of the models, the new proposed model could be used in various cases to avoid abundant experiments. For the simulation of the ANN model, a high-performance CPU (Intel-Core i7-10700k) equipped with 8 cores and a clock speed of 3.8 GHz, paired with 64 GB of RAM, is used.
To add more insight on the selection of the ANN model, a comparison between the predictive capabilities of the ANN and random forest (RF) is performed. The RF model is optimized to achieve its highest accuracy. However, the results showed that the ANN model is superior to this model as well. The MAE of the RF model is 4.87% and the R 2 is 0.94. This shows the superiority of the ANN model over other machine learning models. The reason for this is the complex and deep structure of ANN models, which enables them to predict more complicated problems.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we determined optimal ultrasonic conditions for the hydrolysis of organic solids in raw biological sludge, revealing that a frequency of 50 kHz for 10 min provides effective results. While the highest sludge stabilization efficiency occurred at 50 kHz frequency in 40 min, achieving the 38% organic solid removal standard necessitated more time. Moreover, we established that the optimal conditions for sludge dewatering were at a frequency of 30 kHz with a contact time of 1 min. We also introduced a machine-learning-based model for concentration prediction, meticulously calibrated through hyperparameter tuning, revealing outstanding accuracy, with an R-squared ( R 2 ) value of 0.98 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.37%. To counter overfitting, the model incorporated L2 regularization and dropouts in specific hidden layers. Additionally, a comparison between our ANN model and the random forest algorithm showcased the ANN model’s superiority, with a lower MAE of 1.37% and an R 2 of 0.98, outperforming the RF model with an MAE of 4.87% and an R 2 of 0.94. Simulating the ANN model required a high-performance CPU (Intel Core i7-10700k) featuring 8 cores and a 3.8 GHz clock speed, coupled with 64 GB of RAM, thereby ensuring rapid training and precise predictions. These findings not only enhance our understanding of sludge treatment, but also underscore the potential of machine-learning-based models for precise predictions in various research domains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.J. and C.W.; Methodology, A.E.J., H.K. and A.E.; Software, H.K., M.A., A.E. and S.S.S.; Validation, A.E.J., H.K. and M.A.; Formal analysis, N.T. and M.A.; Investigation, A.E.J., H.K., M.A., A.E. and S.S.S.; Resources, N.T. and M.B.; Data curation, H.K., N.T., M.B. and A.E.; Writing—original draft, A.E.J.; Writing—review and editing, H.K., M.B. and C.W.; Visualization, N.T., M.B., A.E. and S.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University under grant number RGP.2/57/44.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The authors give their consent for publication.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Groups Project under grant number (R.G.P. 2/57/44).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, G.; Zhao, Z.; Yin, X.-A.; Zhu, Y. Impacts of biochars on bacterial community shifts and biodegradation of antibiotics in an agricultural soil during short-term incubation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of microplastics on wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and their removal: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, Z.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Ershadnia, R.; Luan, X.; Soltanian, M.R. An integrated experimental design framework for optimizing solute transport monitoring locations in heterogeneous sedimentary media. J. Hydrol. 2022, 614, 128541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, X.; Lu, K.; Hardison, A.K.; Liu, Z.; Xu, X.; Gao, D.; Gong, J.; Gardner, W.S. Membrane inlet mass spectrometry method (REOX/MIMS) to measure 15N-nitrate in isotope-enrichment experiments. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 126, 107639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dubey, M.; Mohapatra, S.; Tyagi, V.K.; Suthar, S.; Kazmi, A.A. Occurrence, fate, and persistence of emerging micropollutants in sewage sludge treatment. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 273, 116515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, Y.; Zhao, H.; Xv, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Qin, Y.; Li, S.; Lai, J.; Wang, L. Noble metal aerogels rapidly synthesized by ultrasound for electrocatalytic reaction. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 2021–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, W.; Huang, F.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, G.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhen, J.; Lin, Z.; Wang, C. Treatment of CrVI-containing Mg (OH) 2 nanowaste. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 5701–5704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, Y.; Li, Q.; Cui, Q.; Ni, S.Q. Nitrogen recovery through fermentative dissimilatory nitrate reduction to am-monium (DNRA): Carbon source comparison and metabolic pathway. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 441, 135938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fu, W.; Sun, L.; Cao, H.; Chen, L.; Zhou, M.; Shen, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhuang, S. Qualitative and Quantitative Recognition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Their Liquid Phase Based on Terahertz Microfluidic EIT Meta-Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 12775–12784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, S.; Chen, T.; Hou, H.; Xu, Y. Recent advances in electrochemical sterilization. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2023, 937, 117419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, N.; Lu, D.; Sheng, H.; Xia, J.; Kan, P.; Yao, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, G.; Zhu, D.Z.; Liu, H. Constructed wetlands as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens: Evidence from metagenomic analysis in Chinese rural areas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 447, 130778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Paul, E.; Liu, Y. Biological Sludge Minimization and Biomaterials/Bioenergy Recovery Technologie; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu, J.; Zhao, L.; Luo, J.; Gong, H.; Zhu, N. A sustainable reuse strategy of converting waste activated sludge into biochar for contaminants removal from water: Modifications, applications and perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, Y.; Yuan, H.; Ge, D.; Zhu, N. A novel conditioning approach for amelioration of sludge dewaterability using activated carbon strengthening electrochemical oxidation and realized mechanism. Water Res. 2022, 220, 118704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Z.; Hu, L.; Zhao, M.; Dai, L.; Hrynsphan, D.; Tatsiana, S.; Chen, J. Bamboo charcoal fused with polyurethane foam for efficiently removing organic solvents from wastewater: Experimental and simulation. Biochar 2022, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hatinoğlu, M.D.; Sanin, F.D. Sewage sludge as a source of microplastics in the environment: A review of occurrence and fate during sludge treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Reimus, P.; Ma, F.; Soltanian, M.R.; Xing, B.; Zang, J.; Wang, Y.; Dai, Z. Plutonium reactive transport in fractured granite: Multi-species experiments and simulations. Water Res. 2022, 224, 119068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; Ma, F.; Dai, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Ling, H.; Soltanian, M.R. Radionuclide transport in multi-scale fractured rocks: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Xu, P.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; Wan, S. Application of a novel coagulant in reservoir water treatment in Qingdao. Desalination Water Treat 2023, 284, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.; Huang, R.; Sun, R.; Yang, J.; Dionysiou, D.D. Microplastics separation and subsequent carbonization: Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic performance of iron/carbon nanocomposite. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, X.; Kuang, Q.; Cai, Q.; Xue, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y. A Coherent Pattern Mining Algorithm Based on All Contiguous Column Bicluster. J. Artif. Intell. Technol. 2022, 2, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Danjuma, M.U.; Yusuf, B.; Yusuf, I. Reliability, availability, maintainability, and dependability analysis of cold standby series-parallel system. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng. 2022, 1, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huong, A.; Tay, K.; Gan, K.; Ngu, X. A hierarchical optimisation framework for pigmented lesion diagnosis. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2022, 7, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Di Fraia, S.; Macaluso, A.; Massarotti, N.; Vanoli, L. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of a novel geothermal energy system for wastewater and sludge treatment. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 195, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, K.; Zhao, H. The Impact of Green Finance on the Ecologicalization of Urban Industrial Structure—Based on GMM Model of Dynamic Panel System. J. Artif. Intell. Technol. 2022, 2, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Serra-Compte, A.; González, S.; Arnaldos, M.; Berlendis, S.; Courtois, S.; Loret, J.F.; Schlosser, O.; Yáñez, A.M.; Soria-Soria, E.; Fittipaldi, M.; et al. Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 along wastewater and sludge treatment processes. Water Res. 2021, 202, 117435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shakeel, N.; Shakeel, S. Context-Free Word Importance Scores for Attacking Neural Networks. J. Comput. Tional Cogn. Eng. 2022, 1, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kargar, M.; Mahvi, A.H. Effect of Ultrasound in Improving Dewatering and Stabilization of Anaerobic Digested Sludge. 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282722257_Effect_of_Ultrasound_in_improving_dewatering_and_stabilization_of_anaerobic_digested_sludge (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  29. Liu, H.; Yuan, P.; Yang, B.; Yang, G.; Chen, Y. Head-related transfer function–reserved time-frequency masking for robust binaural sound source localization. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2022, 7, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Buonocore, E.; Mellino, S.; De Angelis, G.; Liu, G.; Ulgiati, S. Life cycle assessment indicators of urban wastewater and sewage sludge treatment. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oslund, S.; Washington, C.; So, A.; Chen, T.; Ji, H. Multiview Robust Adversarial Stickers for Arbitrary Objects in the Physical World. J. Comput. Cogn. Eng. 2022, 1, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Houghton, J.J.; Quarmby, J.; Stephenson, T. Municipal wastewater sludge dewaterability and the presence of microbial extracellular polymer. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Z.; De Luca, G.; Archambault, B.; Chavez, J.; Rice, B. Traffic Dataset for Dynamic Routing Algorithm in Traffic Simulation. J. Artif. Intell. Technol. 2022, 2, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gasparin, A.; Lukovic, S.; Alippi, C. Deep learning for time series forecasting: The electric load case. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1907.09207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jákói, Z.; Lemmer, B.; Hodúr, C.; Beszédes, S. Microwave and Ultrasound Based Methods in Sludge Treatment: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, L.; Luo, D.; Hamdaoui, O.; Vasseghian, Y.; Momotko, M.; Boczkaj, G.; Kyzas, G.Z.; Wang, C. Bibliometric analysis and literature review of ultrasound-assisted degradation of organic pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 876, 162551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, C.; Zhang, P.; Wang, H.; Ye, J. Conditioning of sewage sludge via combined ultrasonication-flocculation-skeleton building to improve sludge dewaterability. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lambert, N.; Van Aken, P.; Smets, I.; Appels, L.; Dewil, R. Performance assessment of ultrasonic sludge disintegration in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants under nutrient-deficient conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heidari, A.; Nabizadeh, R.; Alimohammadi, M.; Gholami, M.; Mahvi, A.H. Evaluation of changes in extracellular polymeric substances quantity within sludge dewatering using continues ultrasonic-electrocoagulation reactor. Iran. J. Health Environ. 2015, 8, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mehrdadi, N.; Kootenaei, F.G. An investigation on effect of ultrasound waves on sludge treatment. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Z.; Sun, S.; Gao, M.; Zheng, R.; Mu, H.; Qiu, L.; Ma, J. Degradation of tetracyclines via calcium peroxide activation by ultrasonic: Roles of reactive species, oxidation mechanism and toxicity evaluation. Chemosphere 2023, 334, 139033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, F.; Lu, S.; Ji, M. Components of released liquid from ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2006, 13, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ruiz-Hernando, M.; Vinardell, S.; Labanda, J.; Llorens, J. Effect of ultrasonication on waste activated sludge rheo-logical properties and process economics. Water Res. 2022, 208, 117855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, L.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; Show, P.L.; Ivanets, A.; Luo, D.; Wang, C. MXenes as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts for removal of organic pollutants: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Roy, K.; Gao, C.; Huang, L. The Application of Machine Learning: Controlling the Preparation of Environmental Materials and Carbon Neutrality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eskandari, E.; Alimoradi, H.; Pourbagian, M.; Shams, M. Numerical investigation and deep learning-based prediction of heat transfer characteristics and bubble dynamics of subcooled flow boiling in a vertical tube. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 39, 3227–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cruz, I.A.; Chuenchart, W.; Long, F.; Surendra, K.; Andrade, L.R.S.; Bilal, M.; Liu, H.; Figueiredo, R.T.; Khanal, S.K.; Ferreira, L.F.R. Application of machine learning in anaerobic digestion: Perspectives and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 345, 126433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Waterand Wastewater; American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Azimi, A.; Golrizan, F. Comparison of Chemical Sludge Conditioning Methods in Ghods Wastewater Treatment Plant. 2005. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291432423_Comparison_of_chemical_sludge_conditioning_methods_in_GHODS_wastewater_treatment_plant (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  51. Lin, H.; Xie, K.; Mahendran, B.; Bagley, D.; Leung, K.; Liss, S.; Liao, B. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res. 2009, 43, 3827–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, L.; Luo, D.; Yang, J.; Wang, C. Metal-organic frameworks-derived catalysts for contaminant degradation in persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 375, 134118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cui, Y.; Su, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Peng, Y. Mechanism of Activated Sludge Floc Disintegration Induced by Excess Addition of NaCl. CLEAN Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, G.; He, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, J. Ultrasonic reduction of excess sludge from activated sludge system II: Urban sewage treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1105–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Qin, S.; Lai, W.; Yang, X.; Xu, S.; Lichtfouse, E. Comprehensive role of thermal combined ultrasonic pre-treatment in sewage sludge disposal. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 789, 147862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, S.-S.; Guo, W.-Q.; Meng, Z.-H.; Zhou, X.-J.; Feng, X.-C.; Zheng, H.-S.; Liu, B.; Ren, N.-Q.; Cui, Y.-S. Characterizing the fluorescent products of waste activated sludge in dissolved organic matter following ultrasound assisted ozone pretreatments. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 560–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shrestha, B.; Hernandez, R.; Fortela, D.L.B.; Sharp, W.; Chistoserdov, A.; Gang, D.; Revellame, E.; Holmes, W.; Zappi, M.E. A Review of Pretreatment Methods to Enhance Solids Reduction during Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludges and the Resulting Digester Performance: Implications to Future Urban Biorefineries. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ince, N.H.; Tezcanli, G.; Belen, R.K.; Apikyan, İ.G. Ultrasound as a catalyzer of aqueous reaction systems: The state of the art and environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2001, 29, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gallipoli, A.; Braguglia, C.M. High-frequency ultrasound treatment of sludge: Combined effect of surfactants re-moval and floc disintegration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012, 19, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gallipoli, A.; Gianico, A.; Gagliano, M.; Braguglia, C. Potential of high-frequency ultrasounds to improve sludge anaerobic conversion and surfactants removal at different food/inoculum ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 159, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Braguglia, C.; Gagliano, M.; Rossetti, S. High frequency ultrasound pretreatment for sludge anaerobic digestion: Effect on floc structure and microbial population. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bien, J.B.; Kempa, E.S.; Bien, J.D. Influence of ultrasonic field on structure and parameters of sewage sludge for dewatering process. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Onyeche, T.; Schläfer, O.; Bormann, H.; Schröder, C.; Sievers, M. Ultrasonic cell disruption of stabilised sludge with subsequent anaerobic digestion. Ultrasonics 2002, 40, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tiehm, A.; Nickel, K.; Zellhorn, M.; Neis, U. Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Res. 2001, 35, 2003–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mason, T.J.; Joyce, E.; Phull, S.S.; Lorimer, J.P. Potential uses of ultrasound in the biological decontamination of water. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2003, 10, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bougrier, C.; Carrère, H.; Delgenès, J.P. Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nickel, K.; Neis, U. Ultrasonic disintegration of biosolids for improved biodegradation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2007, 14, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kargar, M.; Mahvi, A.H. The Compare Improvement of Ultrasonic Treatment to Dewatering and Digestion in Aerobic and Anaerobic Stabilization. Iran. J. Health Environ. 2012, 5, 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu, Y.; Tay, J.-H. Strategy for minimization of excess sludge production from the activated sludge process. Biotechnol. Adv. 2001, 19, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, P.; Zhang, G.; Wang, W. Ultrasonic treatment of biological sludge: Floc disintegration, cell lysis and inactivation. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mahvi, A.H. Application of ultrasonic technology for water and wastewater treatment. Iran. J. Public Health 2009, 38, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ghafarzadeh, M.; Abedini, R.; Rajabi, R. Optimization of ultrasonic waves application in municipal wastewater sludge treatment using response surface method. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 150, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mobaraki, M.; Semken, R.S.; Mikkola, A.; Pyrhönen, J. Enhanced sludge dewatering based on the application of high-power ultrasonic vibration. Ultrasonics 2018, 84, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, J.; Liang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhou, J.; Liao, X.; Li, S.; Zheng, L.; Sun, S. Ultrasonic coupled bioleaching pretreatment for enhancing sewage sludge dewatering: Simultaneously mitigating antibiotic resistant genes and changing microbial communities. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 193, 110349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Feng, X.; Deng, J.; Lei, H.; Bai, T.; Fan, Q.; Li, Z. Dewaterability of waste activated sludge with ultrasound conditioning. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wei, H.; Gao, B.; Ren, J.; Li, A.; Yang, H. Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: A review. Water Res. 2018, 143, 608–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Foladori, P.; Andreottola, G.; Ziglio, G. Sludge Reduction Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  78. Weemaes, M.P.J.; Verstraete, W.H. Evaluation of current wet sludge disintegration techniques. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Int. Res. Process Environ. Clean. Technol. 1998, 73, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lifka, J.; Ondruschka, B.; Hofmann, J. Einsatz von Ultraschall zum Schadstoffabbau in Wasser: Aquasonolyse–Eine Über-sicht. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2002, 74, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bozorgnezhad, A.; Shams, M.; Kanani, H.; Hashemi Nasab, M.R. Experimental study of the effect of inlet flow pa-rameters on the operation of PEMFC. Modares Mech. Eng. 2014, 14, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  81. Bozorgnezhad, A.; Shams, M.; Ahmadi, G.; Kanani, H.; Hasheminasab, M. The Experimental Study of Water Accumulation in PEMFC Cathode Channel. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 2015, 57212, V001T22A004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Esfandiar, M.; Nikan, F.; Shahnazari, M.R. Catalytic pyrolysis of coal particles in a fluidized bed: Experiments and modeling. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2017, 39, 1478–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Akbari, M.; Asiabaraki, H.R.; Hassanzadeh, E.; Esfandiar, M. Simulation of dissimilar friction stir welding of AA7075 and AA5083 aluminium alloys using Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. Weld. Int. 2023, 37, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saadati, S.; Esfandiar, M. Partial and full β-bromination of meso-tetraphenylporphyrin: Effects on the catalytic activity of the manganese and nickel complexes for photo oxidation of styrene in the presence of molecular oxygen and visible light. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 924, 121464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shahnazari, M.R.; Esfandiar, M. Capillary Effects on Surface Enhancement in Non-Homogeneous Fibrous Porous Medium. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct. 2018, 5, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bordbar, M.; Naderi, N.; Chamgordani, M.A. The relation of entanglement to the number of qubits and interactions between them for different graph states. Indian J. Phys. 2021, 95, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chamgordani, M.A. The Entanglement Properties of Superposition of Fermionic Coherent States. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2022, 61, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. El Jery, A.; Aldrdery, M.; Shirode, U.R.; Gavilán, J.C.O.; Elkhaleefa, A.; Sillanpää, M.; Sammen, S.S.; Tizkam, H.H. An Efficient Investigation and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Decolorization of Wastewater by Using Zeolite Catalyst in Electro-Fenton Reaction. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. El Jery, A.; Noreen, A.; Isam, M.; Arias-Gonzáles, J.L.; Younas, T.; Al-Ansari, N.; Sammen, S.S. A novel experimental and machine learning model to remove COD in a batch reactor equipped with microalgae. Appl. Water Sci. 2023, 13, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. El Jery, A.; Ramírez-Coronel, A.A.; Gavilán, J.C.O.; Al-Ansari, N.; Sammen, S.S. Proposing empirical correlations and optimization of Nu and Sgen of nanofluids in channels and predicting them using artificial neural network. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 45, 102970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Alimoradi, H.; Eskandari, E.; Pourbagian, M.; Shams, M. A parametric study of subcooled flow boiling of Al2O3/water nanofluid using numerical simulation and artificial neural networks. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 2022, 26, 129–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The difference in the appearance of the sludge prepared at the frequency of 30 kHz during (a) 2 min, (b) 1 min, (c) 30 s, and (d) 0 s contact time with ultrasonic waves after half an hour of settling time.
Figure 1. The difference in the appearance of the sludge prepared at the frequency of 30 kHz during (a) 2 min, (b) 1 min, (c) 30 s, and (d) 0 s contact time with ultrasonic waves after half an hour of settling time.
Sustainability 15 12875 g001
Figure 2. Concentration changes of total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids over time at the frequency of 30 kHz.
Figure 2. Concentration changes of total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids over time at the frequency of 30 kHz.
Sustainability 15 12875 g002
Figure 3. Concentration changes of total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids over time at the frequency of 50 kHz.
Figure 3. Concentration changes of total solids, organic solids, dissolved organic solids, and suspended organic solids over time at the frequency of 50 kHz.
Sustainability 15 12875 g003
Figure 4. The trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, and inorganic solids over time at the frequency of 30 kHz.
Figure 4. The trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, and inorganic solids over time at the frequency of 30 kHz.
Sustainability 15 12875 g004
Figure 5. Trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, and mineral solids over time at a frequency of 50 kHz.
Figure 5. Trend of changes in total solids, organic solids, and mineral solids over time at a frequency of 50 kHz.
Sustainability 15 12875 g005
Figure 6. Percent of changes in sludge-specific resistance over time and ultrasonic frequency shift compared to the control sample.
Figure 6. Percent of changes in sludge-specific resistance over time and ultrasonic frequency shift compared to the control sample.
Sustainability 15 12875 g006
Figure 7. Percent of capillary suction time changes over time and ultrasonic frequency change compared to the control sample.
Figure 7. Percent of capillary suction time changes over time and ultrasonic frequency change compared to the control sample.
Sustainability 15 12875 g007
Figure 8. SEM image of raw activated sludge in ultrasonic time: (a) zero (control), (b) 2 min, (c) 10 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 8. SEM image of raw activated sludge in ultrasonic time: (a) zero (control), (b) 2 min, (c) 10 min, and (d) 30 min.
Sustainability 15 12875 g008
Figure 9. The ANN model predictions for concentration.
Figure 9. The ANN model predictions for concentration.
Sustainability 15 12875 g009
Table 1. ANN model specifications.
Table 1. ANN model specifications.
ParameterValues
Model inputSRF, Frequency, Time
ANN hidden layer structure(32, 64, 128, 256, 128, 64, 32)
The activation function of the output layerReLU
Batch size4
Epochs35,000
Learning rate0.01
Output parameterConcentration
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Jery, A.; Kosarirad, H.; Taheri, N.; Bagheri, M.; Aldrdery, M.; Elkhaleefa, A.; Wang, C.; Sammen, S.S. An Application of Ultrasonic Waves in the Pretreatment of Biological Sludge in Urban Sewage and Proposing an Artificial Neural Network Predictive Model of Concentration. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712875

AMA Style

El Jery A, Kosarirad H, Taheri N, Bagheri M, Aldrdery M, Elkhaleefa A, Wang C, Sammen SS. An Application of Ultrasonic Waves in the Pretreatment of Biological Sludge in Urban Sewage and Proposing an Artificial Neural Network Predictive Model of Concentration. Sustainability. 2023; 15(17):12875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712875

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Jery, Atef, Houman Kosarirad, Nedasadat Taheri, Maryam Bagheri, Moutaz Aldrdery, Abubakr Elkhaleefa, Chongqing Wang, and Saad Sh. Sammen. 2023. "An Application of Ultrasonic Waves in the Pretreatment of Biological Sludge in Urban Sewage and Proposing an Artificial Neural Network Predictive Model of Concentration" Sustainability 15, no. 17: 12875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712875

APA Style

El Jery, A., Kosarirad, H., Taheri, N., Bagheri, M., Aldrdery, M., Elkhaleefa, A., Wang, C., & Sammen, S. S. (2023). An Application of Ultrasonic Waves in the Pretreatment of Biological Sludge in Urban Sewage and Proposing an Artificial Neural Network Predictive Model of Concentration. Sustainability, 15(17), 12875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop