Next Article in Journal
A Review of Rubberised Asphalt for Flexible Pavement Applications: Production, Content, Performance, Motivations and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Orange Waste Extract Produced by Hydrodynamic Cavitation on the Germination of Chenopodium album L. and Lactuca sativa L.
Previous Article in Journal
Land Development Planning: New Principles and New Representations in the General Urban Plan of Parma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Almonds By-Product Microcrystalline Cellulose as Stucco for Wooden Artifacts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Mucilage-Based Painting Binders for Conservation of Cultural Heritage

by
Giulia D’Agostino
1,2,
Rosalia Merra
3,
Natale Badalamenti
3,4,*,
Giuseppe Lazzara
1,5,
Maurizio Bruno
3,4,5 and
Francesco Sottile
5,6
1
Physics and Chemistry Department (DiFC), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche (STEBICEF), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
4
NBFC—National Biodiversity Future Center, 90133 Palermo, Italy
5
Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca “Riutilizzo Bio-Based Degli Scarti da Matrici Agroalimentari” (RIVIVE), Università degli Sudi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14487; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914487
Submission received: 8 September 2023 / Revised: 27 September 2023 / Accepted: 3 October 2023 / Published: 4 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strengthening the Circular Economy: The Reuse of Agri-Food Waste)

Abstract

:
The possibility of using materials from the waste of agricultural products for the conservation of cultural and artistic heritage has led to important technological developments on mortars, plasters, colors, and other applications. In this experimental work, we investigated the binding properties of mucilage obtained from two different species of the genus Opuntia, both collected in Sicily, Italy: Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Through chemical acid hydrolysis, and subsequent spectroscopic analysis conducted at 13C-NMR, the main monosaccharide composition of both mucilage was studied, identifying considerable compositional differences. In fact, the mucilage of O. ficus indica had similar total amounts of arabinose (23.65%), galactose (20.87%), and glucose isomers (23.89%), while that of O. stricta was characterized by significant amounts of arabinose (36.48%) and galactose (32.31%) units. The samples were obtained by dispersing pigments on the mucilage and applying the obtained tempera by a brush onto both paper and chalk supports, in order to observe if the colors changed with different substrates. Colorimetric analysis, measuring ΔE, showed how the same pigment modifies its aspect depending on the binder used. After a two-week UV ageing process, pigments that had dispersed in O. stricta changed their aspect more than those dispersed in O. ficus-indica. Overall, it is also evident how ΔE data for organic pigments are higher than those for inorganic ones.

1. Introduction

The agri-food industry generates, every year, high quantities of waste, very often stored on the farm, creating serious environmental problems and requiring the necessary study for its reuse [1]. It is estimated that in the European Union, waste resulting from the food supply chain reaches peaks of 130–150 tons per year [2], and around 50% is entirely produced within the company’s agri-food chain. Nowadays, many industries have changed their way of thinking and means of operation. Most waste, in fact, can and does become new resources for new raw materials such as precious chemical substances, finding applications in sectors such as food, nutraceuticals, biodiesel, etc.
The genus Opuntia spp. includes many species that belong to the Cactaceae family known to have specific nutritional properties [3,4]. The ability of these species to live under conditions of reduced water availability appears increasingly relevant today in a global context in which droughts affect large territories [5,6]. For this reason, the United Nations has urged the consideration of the importance of these species, which, in some areas of the world, have often been considered invasive or lacking in intrinsic value [7]. In the current climate crisis, however, the genus Opuntia spp. must be considered an important resource, especially from a food perspective, and this approach intersects with many of the sustainable development goals, both in terms of mitigating climate change as well as in terms of biodiversity conservation and responsible consumption and production.
Dietary interest in the genus Opuntia, albeit in the presence of vast biodiversity, is almost concentrated on the fruits of O. ficus-indica (OF) [8]. Other species, however, are of interest for food purposes, related to the fruit or cladodes deprived of their spines. Among these, O. stricta (OS) (Haw.) Haw. (syn. Opuntia dillenii (Ker-Gawl) Haw.) has long appeared to be of strategic interest partly because it has an abundance of fruit and extraordinary plasticity of adaptation [9].
More recently, the study of derivatives obtained from the processing of many cacti plant parts [10,11,12] has highlighted that these species are also of great relevance because of the high amount of bioactive substances, as well as natural products, again with the aim of building a model for bio-based extraction and application of by-products of natural origin [13]. These bioactive compounds are influenced by species and cultivar as well as, of course, climatic area, and have multiple effects, from antimicrobial to antioxidant actions, to the extraction of biopolymers for industrial activities with low environmental impact [14].
Mucilage, among these, is particularly present in cladodes. From a biological point of view, it represents the basis of a system of natural adaptation to conditions of limited water availability that very often characterizes the areas of origin and spread of these species [15]. From a circular economy perspective, the production of mucilage derived from cladodes and its application in many directions represent an important alternative economic resource to that of fruits, as it allows the residues of plant pruning, which is carried out annually under all growing conditions, to be given new value [16].
The fruits, infusions of dried flowers, and cladodes collected from OF and OS, present different biological activities confirmed in the literature. They are widely recognized in ethnomedicine, considered entirely edible, whether boiled or fried, and are non-toxic for human consumption [17,18,19].
The mucilage obtained from different Opuntia species have a wide applicability, both in the food and in the pharmaceutical industry, as binders, thickeners, gelling agents, and stabilizers [20]. Various research has highlighted how the different mucilage demonstrate excellent health properties such as anti-ulcer [21], anti-inflammatory [22], cytoprotective [23], hypolipidemic [19], antioxidant [24], antimicrobial [25], and cholesterol lowering activities [26], and their biological and technological properties in food preparation have been recently reviewed [27]. The use of mucilage to create edible films with antimicrobial properties is reported in Naeeji’s study [28]. Furthermore, the mucilage can preserve foods from fungal attacks and have several beneficial impacts, mainly on microbial spoilage and physicochemical properties of fresh strawberries during refrigerated storage [29].
Due to their nutritional properties, plants of this genus have always been underestimated but are mainly used as agricultural waste. In fact, in recent decades, various research has exploited the antioxidant capacity of the mucilage of various cactus cultivars for the production of biodegradable food packaging with antioxidant capacity. This aspect is, in any way, facilitated by the enormous quantity of waste (cladodes) that are produced annually, in particular from OF extension cultivations.
Currently, there are few examples in the literature describing the preparation of biofilms using various mucilage, adding pectin, chitosan, etc. Aparicio-Fernández et al. [30] demonstrated how the union between OF mucilage with carboxymethylcellulose improved the antioxidant capacity and reduced the power of biofilms; also, the authors found that using alginate pearls avoided the formulation of bacterial strains on hamburgers used as a medium control [31]. From the data researched in the literature, there is no evidence of the use of mucilage as a binder for pictorial purposes to be applied in the field of conservation of cultural heritage. The study by Karami et al. [32] suggest that mucilage nanofibers prepared using the electrospinning method have potential applications in the food packaging field for the encapsulation of this substance with good antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and also for their sustained release.
OF confirms to be a crop of great importance on a global scale because it provides food for humans and animals but, at the same time, it allows for the production of bioactive substances with multiple properties, including pharmacological ones [33,34]. It is often reported that the fruit’s potential in anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, and antimicrobial fields, as well as its antioxidant power, make this fruit particularly important in the functional diet in many communities around the world [35]. Some authors have also verified the possibility of using OF extracts as a coagulant for the treatment of polluted water, thus proving to be an environmentally friendly and sustainable process [36].
Artistic creation has accompanied human development since the origin of mankind. In the past, the manufacturing processes of color were often characterized by very complex techniques and materials, sometimes requiring the user to have expansive knowledge of interrelationships. In fact, for tempera, for example, the realization of these techniques involved and still involves the use of powdered colors (pigments) and animal glues (casein, milk, hen’s egg yolk, animal glue, etc.), which are soluble in water, used as binders and mainly used on chalk supports, from the 12th to the 15th century, until the widespread use of oil painting [37]. A scientific study on the fragments of Julio-Claudian wall paintings has highlighted how the Romans mainly used dyes from the plant world (e.g., Basella rubra, Sesanum radiatum, Lamium purpureum), vegetable waxes, oils (Brassicaceae), and resins (Pinaceae) as binders, replacing them with animal glues (e.g., collagen, egg) [38]. The Nordic peoples and some Italian Renaissance painters (Gentile da Fabriano; Sandro Botticelli) used to add honey to the dough to delay the drying of the color; the southern peoples added fig latex and wine. In numerous art objects, pigments, both natural and synthetic, are mixed with various binders, some of vegetal origin (gum Arabic; starch), others of animal source (gelatin, egg white, and egg yolk). The binding medium, through weak interactions, can significantly influence the final shade and stability of the dye [39].
The existing knowledge has been passed down through the ages and used repeatedly; but furthermore, the primary materials have been developed and sensibly adapted to several areas of application and needs, depending on the times [40]. As part of our ongoing research, these two mucilage have been used, for the first time, in an utterly innovative way, as possible new pictorial binders, testing their properties and studying their colorimetric aspects, highlighting the differences in terms of chemical composition and capacity binder.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Pigments

Inorganic pigments, such as terra di Siena naturale, yellow ochre, yellow cadmium, red cadmium, red Indian, land of natural shade (raw umber), scorched shadow earth (burnt umber), black ivory, ultramarine, cerulean, chromium oxide (III), and emerald, were purchased from F.lli Maimeri S.A. (Bettolino di Mediglia, 20076, Mediglia, Italy) and used without further purification; organic pigments, such as safranin, scarlet red R, carmine, phloxine B, carmine Naccarat, vesuvine, Dahlia, cresyl fast violet, gallocyanine, cochineal, and crocein scarlet were purchased from Carlo Erba (Milan, 20010, Italy). White papers (Fabriano, 20135, Milan, Italy), chalk, rabbit glue, and paint brush (Antichità Belsito, 00136, Rome, Italy) were purchased without further modification; all chemical reagents were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Via Monte Rosa, 93, 20149 Milan, Italy) and were used without further modifications.

2.2. Plant Material

Fresh cladodes of OS were harvested in Isola delle Femmine, Sicily, (38°12′07″ N, 13°14′40″ E, 9 m.s.l.) Italy, in April 2023. Cladodes of OF were harvested in Alimena, Sicily, (37°42′03″ N 14°07′12″ E, 750 m.s.l.) Italy, in March 2023. Authentication was conducted by Prof. Francesco Sottile, and vouchers have been deposited in the STEBICEF Department, University of Palermo (PAL113518 and PAL113560).

2.3. Extraction of Mucilage from OF and OS

Several cladodes of OS (1000 g) and OF (1000 g) were used for the extraction of mucilage. The cladodes were washed and, after the removing of spines, were cut into small pieces and infused in water (2 L) at room temperature for 24 h in order to facilitate the release of the mucilage in dispersion. The mucilage formed was removed using a cotton cloth to remove plant residues. The extraction was repeated three times. The viscous filtrates were pooled together (about 6 L). A total volume of 50 mL of both dispersions were freeze-dried to present a yield of 2.55 and 1.04%, respectively, for OS and OF. A total volume of 1 L of single mucilage dispersions were concentrated under reduced pressure at 40–50 °C using rotavapor in order to obtain the same concentration (9%) for both solutions.

2.3.1. Chemical Hydrolysis of Mucilage

In order to characterize the mucilage, it was necessary to identify the monosaccharides that compose it. An aliquot of both mucilage (25 mg) was hydrolyzed by adding 2.5 mL of 2 M H2SO4 and maintained at a temperature of 80 °C for four hours. After hydrolysis, the solution was neutralized by adding 14 M NH4OH. The solution was freeze-dried and then methanol was added to extract the simple sugars obtained via hydrolysis. The methanolic solution was filtered through silica gel, evaporated, and the remaining solid was solubilized in D2O for NMR analysis.

2.3.2. NMR Analysis

The NMR spectra of the two hydrolyzed mucilage were acquired in heavy water (D2O) using the Brucker Avance II spectrometer, present at the CGA (Centro Grandi Apparecchiature) of the University of Palermo, operating at a frequency of 100 MHz for the acquisition of 13C-NMR. The chemical shifts are reported relative to the carbonyl of the acetone residual peak, added as internal standard (215.94 ppm for 13C-NMR).

2.4. Preparation of Samples

The study carried out included the use of OF and OS mucilage solutions, used at the same concentration (9%) as a binder of organic and inorganic pigments for the creation of a new prototype of painting colors. Every single pigment, accurately weighed (0.15 g), was finely ground in a glass mortar with 1 mL of each mucilage solution. Finally, the obtained tempera were manually applied with the Winsor & Newton brush on square chromatic fields (2 × 2 cm), and left to dry for 48 h, on paper and chalk supports.

2.5. Colorimetric and Statistical Analyses

Color parameters of samples were measured using a colorimeter (NH300 Colorimeter, 3NH Shanghai Co., Ltd.) and elaborated with CQCS3 software for data acquisition. L* (lightness), a* (red-green), and b* (yellow-blue) parameters were measured and compared for the same pigment dispersed in the two different binders. In order to compare them, the total color differences (ΔE) was calculated [41]. In order to make an average estimation on the sample surface, we carried out three replicated color measurements. The average values are provided in the discussions section and the relative standard deviation was constantly below 5% of the obtained values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition of OF and OS Mucilage

Numerous extraction techniques have been developed and largely improved over the years to facilitate the extraction of mucilage, trying to increase its yield by increasing its use and application at an industrial level. Classic extraction mainly involves methods that exploit the action of different solvents more or less similar to the chemical–physical characteristics of mucilage, but innovative techniques, such as ultrasound-assisted (UAE) and/or microware (MAE) extraction have proven to be widely useful and advantageous for isolating mucilage in good quantities [27]. Some studies have shown that conventional extraction techniques can provide a good yield of extracted mucilage [42] and that in some cases it can be superior to the results obtained with non-conventional methods [43].
In this scientific work, a conventional mucilage extraction method was used. This method was chosen mainly because it is simple and easy to implement and is economical; since it does not require robust equipment, it does not require the use of solvents that are harmful and toxic to humans and the environment.
With the aim to determine the chemical composition of the mucilage, an aliquot of both mucilage dispersions was subjected to acidic hydrolyses [44] to provide the single hydrolyzed monosaccharides mixture. The solid residual was dissolved in D2O and analyzed via 13C-NMR spectroscopy. In particular, the range of chemical shifts between 90 and 100 ppm, typical of the anomeric carbons of monosaccharides, was observed (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The comparison with the data reported in the literature [45] allowed for the identification of the monosaccharides present in the mixture. The signals observed within the spectra indicate both anomers of the single sugars detected in the hydrolyzed mucilage. By comparing the area of the peaks, it was possible to quantify the percentages of sugars present in both mucilage (Table 1). The main sugars occurring in the OS mucilage were arabinose (36.48%) and galactose (32.31%), followed by minor amounts of xylose (15.36%), glucose (10.45%), and rhamnose (5.40%). The only other paper reporting the composition of OS mucilage concerned an Indian accession of this plant [19]. The results of this analysis, carried out via gas–liquid chromatography of the alditol acetates, were similar but not identical with respect to the results of the Sicilian accession. In fact, although the main sugars identified were arabinose (38.80%) and galactose (33.00%), the other three sugars occurred in different amounts (rhamnose (15.70%), xylose (5.10%), and glucose (5.10%)). Similar quantities of arabinose, galactose, and glucose were instead identified in the mucilage of OF.
A scientific study has evaluated the impact of seasonality and age on the sugar content of eight specimens of OF. From the data collected through HPLC-MS analysis, the presence of sugars similar to that reported in Table 1 has been verified, confirming, also in this case, the absence of neutral rhamnose [46]. However, it should be underlined that other authors report the massive presence of D-galactose and L-arabinose residues in OF mucilage [47], while other authors confirmed the presence of the latter two sugars accompanied by the chemical detection of glucuronic acids and rhamnose residues [48].
Unlike OS, OF mucilage also exhibited characteristic peaks of the two α- and β-isomers of fucose and glucuronic acids (11.74 and 8.88%, respectively). Finally, a minor presence of xylose (10.96% in OF than 15.33% in the OS mucilage) and the absence of rhamnose were detected in OF.

3.2. Colorimetric Analysis

Upon observing the samples made using pigments dispersed in both OF and OS binders, it was noticed how the same pigment changed its appearance, notably affected by binder changing. For this reason, a colorimetric analysis was conducted in order to obtain data to measure the change in appearance depending on the binders used, but also on the material when the color is laid. The parameters were measured using a portable colorimeter (NH300 Colorimeter, 3NH Shanghai Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and the CQCS3 software for data acquisition. L* (lightness), a* (red-green), and b* (yellow-blue) were the variables measured and compared between the different binders and material supports. The total color differences (ΔE) were calculated using the following formula [41,49]:
Δ E * = Δ L * 2 + Δ a * 2 + Δ b * 2
From the data reported in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, it can be observed that, for most cases, pigments show high values of ΔE, changing the binder and material of the support in which it is laid. Since a ΔE value of 2.3 up to 4.0 corresponds to a noticeable difference according to human eyes, it is clear that these data match, albeit with a huge difference, in the appearance (Figure 3A and Figure 4B), reaching a peak of ΔE = 31.0 for cresyl fast violet pigment dispersed in OF and OS, laid on chalk support. These results emphasize the reported differences between pigments, which were immediately visible when laid in the supports (Figure 5A and Figure 6B): changing binders, colors reveal distinct shades, brightness, and texture. Regardless of the support used, pigments exhibit a deeper color when dispersed in OF, with a full-bodied texture unlike the ones in OS, sometimes tending to transparency (Figure 4B).
Comparing the two binders, it is also evident how ΔE data for organic pigments are higher than those for inorganic ones, equally on paper or chalk support. In this regard, it has come to our attention that the cresyl fast violet ΔE values (27.0 and 31.0, respectively, laid on paper and chalk supports) were the highest data for the organic category, while for inorganic pigments, the highest ΔE values were for chromium oxide (III) pigments (18.4 and 17.6, respectively, on paper and chalk supports).
With regard to ageing, after 3 weeks of UV exposure, each sample showed aesthetic changes with a ΔE in no cases lower than 2, unlike the OF samples, which did not show aesthetic changes perceivable by the human eye (Figure 7A,B). In general, the OS samples had higher ΔE values than OF ones, no matter the support in which they were laid. Moreover, for most cases, ΔE indices after ageing for organic pigments were mainly higher than inorganic ones. Between paper and chalk samples before and after ageing, for inorganic pigments, the highest ΔE value is 15.8 (burnt umber laid on paper), while taking into account organic pigments, it registered a maximum ΔE of 17.9 (Dahlia laid on wood); in both cases, the worst ageing is reached with OS as the binder. These data are reflected in a visible change in color, evident for burnt umber, but more marked for Dahlia (Figure 8A and Figure 9B).
In artistic objects, dyes, natural or synthetic pigments, and polyxaridic (gum Arabic, starch) and/or protein (gelatin, egg white, etc.) binders are mixed together [39]. The scented binder significantly influences the final shade as well as stability over time. Vermeulen and colleagues [39] highlighted how the stability of arsenic sulfide varies depending on the binder chosen; gum Arabic, for example, allowed maximum temporal stability of the final dye, compared to the use of the egg in its different parts. Effects on stability were also confirmed by a study using carminic dyes. Haberova et al., in effect, have deduced, through the aid of parallel techniques (UV-Vis, FT-IR, GC-MS, and HPLC-MS techniques), the influence of albumin and gum Arabic on the thermal stability of final tempering, but not on the colorimetric parameters [50].
In the case reported here, the OF mucilage tends to make the dyes brighter when used. This can be interpreted as a greater presence of free methyl groups than the OS mucilage. The fucose units contain a -CH3 group linked to position 5, which probably allows for a greater solubilization of the pigments used, compared to the more polar OS mucilage, also due to the presence of glucuronic acid units. However, in general, colorimetric analysis did not present significant differences in data between samples laid on paper or chalk support; this means that the material support did not considerably affect the aesthetic appearance of the color samples.

4. Conclusions

The use of natural by-products requires particular attention both for the concepts related to the circular economy and for the possible physical–chemical interferences related to their application. For this reason, in this work, with the support of the relative chemical and physical analyses, an attempt has been made to identify new possible binders to be exploited in the pictorial technique of tempera. In particular, the mucilage extracted from Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. were used as new binders. The monosaccharic units of the two mucilage were identified by means of the 13C-NMR spectroscopic technique, highlighting their compositional differences—one mainly characterized by a high amount of arabinose (36.48%) and galactose (32.31%), while the other diversified by almost the same presence of arabinose (23.65%), galactose (20.87%), and glucose isomers (23.89%). The different pigments were dispersed in both mucilage (OF and OS), highlighting, after colorimetric analysis, enormous aesthetic differences: the pigments dispersed in OS, in fact, witnessed a greater aesthetic change, clearly visible to the naked eye, compared to those in OF. In general, inorganic pigments performed better toward mucilage, recording negligible changes in ΔE before and after aging. No significant difference was found in the data between the samples laid on paper or chalk supports; this means that the material support did not significantly influence the aesthetic appearance of the color samples. It can be concluded that OF is suitable as a binder for pigments, producing colors with a deep shade, full brightness, full-bodied texture, and is resistant to UV ageing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B., F.S. and M.B.; methodology, G.D., G.L., N.B. and M.B.; formal analysis, N.B., M.B., G.D., R.M. and G.L.; investigation, N.B., G.D. and R.M.; resources, F.S., N.B. and M.B.; data curation, G.D., R.M., N.B., M.B. and G.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D., R.M., F.S. and N.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B., F.S. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (Italy)—Project title: “Innovazioni tecnologiche bio-based e potenziamento dell’economia circolare nella gestione degli scarti da lavorazione primaria di mandorle biologiche con elevate potenzialità agroindustriali” # F/200037/01- 03/X45; and by National Biodiversity Future Center S.c.a.r.l., Piazza Marina 61 (c/o Palazzo Steri) Palermo, Italy, C.I. CN00000033—CUP UNIPA B73C22000790001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Papaioannou, E.H.; Mazzei, R.; Bazzarelli, F.; Piacentini, E.; Giannakopoulos, V.; Roberts, M.R.; Giorno, L. Agri-Food Industry Waste as Resource of Chemicals: The Role of Membrane Technology in Their Sustainable Recycling. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Caldeira, C.; De Laurentiis, V.; Corrado, S.; van Holsteijn, F.; Sala, S. Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: A mass flow analysis. Res. Cons. Recycl. 2019, 149, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Paiva, P.M.G.; de Souza, I.F.A.C.; Costa, M.C.V.V.; Santos, A.D.F.S.; Coelho, L.C.B.B. Opuntia sp. cactus: Biological characteristics, cultivation and applications. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Butera, D.; Tesoriere, L.; di Gaudio, F.; Bongiorno, A.; Allegra, M.; Pintaudi, A.M.; Livrea, M.A. Antioxidant activities of Sicilian prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica) fruit extracts and reducing properties of its betalains: Betanin and indicaxanthin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6895–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nuzhyna, N.; Baglay, K.; Golubenko, A.; Lushchak, O. Anatomically distinct representatives of Cactaceae Juss. family have different response to acute heat shock stress. Flora 2018, 242, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scalisi, A.; Morandi, B.; Inglese, P.; Lo Bianco, R. Cladode growth dynamics in Opuntia ficus-indica under drought. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Novoa, A.; Le Roux, J.J.; Robertson, M.P.; Wilson, J.R.U.; Richardson, D.M. Introduced and invasive cactus species: A global review. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plu078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shetty, A.A.; Rana, M.K.; Preetham, S.P. Cactus: A medicinal food. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Medina, E.M.D.; Rodríguez, E.M.R.; Romero, C.D. Chemical characterization of Opuntia dillenii and Opuntia ficus indica fruits. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aruwa, C.E.; Amoo, S.O.; Kudanga, T. Opuntia (Cactaceae) plant compounds, biological activities and prospects—A comprehensive review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chiaraluce, G. Circular economy in the agri-food sector: A policy overview. Ital. Rev. Agr. Econ. 2021, 76, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sottile, F.; Modica, A.; Rosselli, S.; Catania, C.A.; Cavallaro, G.; Lazzara, G.; Bruno, M. Hand-made paper obtained by green procedure of cladode waste of Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. from Sicily. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rai, P.; Mehrotra, S.; Priya, S.; Gnansounou, E.; Sharma, S.K. Recent advances in the sustainable design and applications of biodegradable polymers. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Da Silveira Agostini-Costa, T. Genetic and environment effects on bioactive compounds of Opuntia cacti—A review. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2022, 109, 104514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lira-Vargas, A.A.; Lira-Vargas, A.A.; Corrales-Garcia, J.J.E.; Valle-Guadarrama, S.; Peña-Valdivia, C.B.; Trejo-Marquez, M. Biopolymeric films based on cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) mucilage incorporated with gelatin and beeswax. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev. 2014, 16, 51–70. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pérez-Cadena, R.; Espinosa-Solares, T.; Medina-Moreno, S.A.; Martínez, A.; Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A.; Téllez-Jurado, A. Effect of the age of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes on the release of simple sugars. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 33, 102010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, J.; Han, Y.L.; Jin, Z.Y.; Xu, X.M.; Zha, X.Q.; Chen, H.Q.; Yin, Y.Y. Protective effect of polysaccharides from Opuntia dillenii Haw. fruits on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 124, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Min, Z.; Lou, F. Two novel C29-5β-sterols from the stems of Opuntia dillenii. Steroids 2006, 71, 1073–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalegowda, P.; Chauhan, A.S.; Nanjaraj Urs, S.M. Opuntia dillenii (Ker-Gawl) Haw cladode mucilage: Physico-chemical, rheological and functional behavior. Carbohyd. Polym. 2017, 157, 1057–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malviya, R. Extraction characterization and evaluation of selected mucilage as pharmaceutical excipient. Polim. Med. 2011, 41, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Galati, E.M.; Monforte, M.T.; Tripodo, M.M.; d’Aquino, A.; Mondello, M.R. Antiulcer activity of Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. (Cactaceae): Ultrastructuralstudy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 76, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trombetta, D.; Puglia, C.; Perri, D.; Licata, A.; Pergolizzi, S.; Lauriano, E.R.; De Pasquale, A.; Saija, A.; Bonina, F.P. Effect of polysaccharides from Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) cladodes on the healing of dermal wounds in the rat. Phytomedicine 2006, 13, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Galati, E.M.; Monforte, M.T.; Miceli, N.; Mondello, M.R.; Taviano, M.F.; Galluzzo, M.; Tripodo, M.M. Opuntia ficus indica (L.) Mill. mucilages show cytoprotectiveeffect on gastric mucosa in rat. Phytother. Res. 2007, 25, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bayar, N.; Kriaa, M.; Kammoun, R. Extraction and characterization of three polysaccharides extracted from Opuntia ficus indica cladodes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ammar, I.; Bardaa, S.; Mzid, M.; Sahnoun, Z.; Rebaii, T.; Attia, H.; Ennouri, M. Antioxidant, antibacterial and in vivo dermal wound healing effects of Opuntia flower extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Galati, E.M.; Tripodo, M.M.; Trovato, A.; d’Aquino, A.; Monforte, M.T. Biological activity of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes II: Effect on experimentalhypercholesterolemia in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Andreade Viera, E.; Tribuzy de Magalhães Cordeiro, A.M. Bioprospectin and potential of cactus muculages: A bibliometric review. Food Chem. 2023, 401, 134121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naeeji, N.; Shahbazi, Y.; Shavisi, N. Effect of gamma irradiation on physico-mechanical andstructural properties of basil seed mucilage-chitosan films containing Ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil and MgO nanoparticles for rainbow trout packaging. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shahbazi, Y.; Shavisi, N.; Karami, N. Development of edible bioactive coating based on mucilages for increasing the shelf life of strawberries. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aparicio-Fernández, X.; Vega-Ahuatzin, A.; Ochoa-Velasco, C.E.; Cid-Pérez, S.; Hernández-Carranza, P.; Ávila-Sosa, R. Physical and antioxidant characterization of edible films added with red prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) cv. San Martín peel andor its aqueous extracts. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parafati, L.; Palmeri, R.; Trippa, D.; Restuccia, C.; Fallico, B. Quality maintenance of beef burger patties by direct addiction or encapsulation of a prickly pear fruit extract. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Karami, N.; Kamkar, A.; Shahbazi, Y.; Misaghi, A. Electrospinning of double-layer chitosan-flaxseed mucilage nanofibers for sustained release of Ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil and sesame oil. LWT 2020, 140, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ginestra, G.; Parker, M.L.; Bennett, R.N.; Robertson, J.; Mandalari, G.; Narbad, A.; Lo Curto, R.B.; Bisignano, G.; Faulds, C.B.; Waldron, K.W. Anatomical, Chemical, and Biochemical Characterization of Cladodes from Prickly Pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.]. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10323–10330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Silva, M.A.; Albuquerque, T.G.; Pereira, P.; Ramalho, R.; Vicente, F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Costa, H.S. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.: A multi-benefit potential to be exploited. Molecules 2021, 26, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Mostafa, K.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Cherkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vishali, S.; Karthikeyan, R. Cactus Opuntia ficus-indica: An eco-friendly alternative coagulant in the treatment of paint effluent. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 56, 1489–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coldagelli, M.C.; Torrioli, N. Introduzione ai supporti tessili, in Agati, Coldagelli, Consoni, Merucci, Minunno, Rorro, Serafini, TorriolI. In I Supporti Nelle Arti Pittoriche—Storia, Tecnica, Restauro; Parte Seconda; Maltese, C., Ed.; Mursia: Milan, Italy, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gismondi, A.; Canuti, L.; Rocco, G.; Pisani, M.; Ghelli, A.; Bonanno, M.; Canini, A. GC–MS detection of plant pigments and metabolites in Roman Julio-Claudian wall paintings. Phytochem. Lett. 2018, 25, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vermuelen, M.; Janssens, K.; Sanyova, J.; Rahemi, V.; McGlinchey, C.; De Wael, C. Assessung the stability of arsenic sulfide pigments and influence of the binding media on their degradation by means of spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gärtner, M. Historical pigments, dyes and binders. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2021, 6, 419–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sharma, G.; Bala, R.; Bala, R. Digital Color Imaging Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  42. Felkai-Haddache, L.; Dahmoune, F.; Remini, H.; Lefsih, K.; Mouni, L.; Madani, K. Microwave optimization of mucilage extraction from Opuntia ficus indica cladodes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 84, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hernàndez-Carranza, P.; Rivadeneyra-Mata, M.; Ramos-Cassellis, M.E.; Aparicio-Fernàndez, X.; Navarro-Cruz, A.R.; Avila-Sosa, R.; Ochoa-Velasco, C.E. Characterization of red prickly pear peel (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) and its mucilage obtained by traditional and novel methodologies. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Happi Emaga, T.; Rabetafika, N.; Blecker, C.S.; Paquot, M. Kinetics of the hydrolysis of polysaccharide galacturonic acid and neutral sugars chains from flaxseed mucilage. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2012, 16, 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  45. Agrawal, P.K. NMR spectroscopy in the structural elucidation of oligosaccharides and glycosides. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3307–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ribeiro, E.M.O.; Silva, N.H.; Lima Filho, J.L.; Brito, J.Z.; Silva, M.P.C. Study of carbohydrates present in the cladodes of Opuntia ficus-indica (fodder palm), according to age and season. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2010, 30, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Harlay, V. Sur le mucilage du cactus à raquettes (Opuntia vulgaris Mill.). J. Pharm. Chim. 1902, 16, 193–198. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sands, L.; Klaas, R. Composition of cholla gum.I. the isolation of L-arabinose, D-galactose and L-rhamnose. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1929, 51, 3441–3446. [Google Scholar]
  49. Meng, B.; Mueller, U.; Garcia, O.; Malaga, K. Performance of a new anti-graffiti agent used for immovable cultural heritage objects. Int. J. Arch. Herit. 2014, 8, 820–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Haberovà, K.; Jančovičovà, V.; Veselà, D.; Machatovà, Z.; Oravec, M. Impact of organic binders on the carminic-colorants stability studied by: ATR-FTIR, VIS and colorimetry. Dyes Pigments 2020, 186, 108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 13C-NMR spectrum (D2O) of the anomeric carbons of the sugar composing the O. stricta (OS) mucilage.
Figure 1. 13C-NMR spectrum (D2O) of the anomeric carbons of the sugar composing the O. stricta (OS) mucilage.
Sustainability 15 14487 g001
Figure 2. 13C-NMR spectrum (D2O) of the anomeric carbons of the sugar composing the O. ficus indica (OF) mucilage.
Figure 2. 13C-NMR spectrum (D2O) of the anomeric carbons of the sugar composing the O. ficus indica (OF) mucilage.
Sustainability 15 14487 g002
Figure 3. (A) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a paper support, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a chalk support, produced using CQCS3 software.
Figure 3. (A) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a paper support, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a chalk support, produced using CQCS3 software.
Sustainability 15 14487 g003
Figure 4. (A) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a real paper support. (B) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a real chalk support.
Figure 4. (A) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a real paper support. (B) Safranin pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a real chalk support.
Sustainability 15 14487 g004
Figure 5. (A) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a paper support, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a chalk support, produced using CQCS3 software.
Figure 5. (A) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a paper support, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b) laid in a chalk support, produced using CQCS3 software.
Sustainability 15 14487 g005
Figure 6. (A) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b), laid in a real paper support. (B) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b), laid in a real chalk support.
Figure 6. (A) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b), laid in a real paper support. (B) Emerald green pigment dispersed in OF (a) and in OS (b), laid in a real chalk support.
Sustainability 15 14487 g006
Figure 7. (A) Ultramarine blue pigment dispersed in OF, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Ultramarine blue pigment dispersed in OF, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing.
Figure 7. (A) Ultramarine blue pigment dispersed in OF, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Ultramarine blue pigment dispersed in OF, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing.
Sustainability 15 14487 g007
Figure 8. (A) Burnt umber pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a paper support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Dahlia pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software.
Figure 8. (A) Burnt umber pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a paper support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software. (B) Dahlia pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing, produced using CQCS3 software.
Sustainability 15 14487 g008
Figure 9. (A) Burnt umber pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a real paper support before (a) and after (b) ageing. (B) Dahlia pigment dispersed in OS laid in a real chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing.
Figure 9. (A) Burnt umber pigment dispersed in OS, laid in a real paper support before (a) and after (b) ageing. (B) Dahlia pigment dispersed in OS laid in a real chalk support before (a) and after (b) ageing.
Sustainability 15 14487 g009
Table 1. Sugars composing the O. stricta (OS) and O. ficus-indica (OF) mucilage and 13C-NMR value of the anomeric carbons.
Table 1. Sugars composing the O. stricta (OS) and O. ficus-indica (OF) mucilage and 13C-NMR value of the anomeric carbons.
SugarppmSugarppmArea (%)
OS
Area (%)
OF
α-arabinose97.6β-arabinose93.436.4823.65
β-fucose97.2α-fucose93.1-11.74
β-galactose97.3α-galactose93.232.3120.87
β-glucose96.8α-glucose93.010.4523.89
β-glucuronic acid96.7α-glucuronic acid92.9-8.88
α-rhamnose94.9β-rhamnose94.45.40-
β-xylose97.5α-xylose93.115.3310.96
Table 2. ΔE of inorganic pigments stretched upon a paper support.
Table 2. ΔE of inorganic pigments stretched upon a paper support.
PigmentΔE of OF and OS Samples *ΔE of OF Samples Before and After Ageing *ΔE of OS Samples Before and After Ageing *
Terra di Siena5.10.53.6
Yellow ochre4.40.16.9
Cadmium yellow2.52.54.1
Cadmium red16.80.72.7
Indian red1.40.95.8
Raw umber10.87.29.5
Burnt umber15.20.515.8
Ivory black3.91.910.8
Ultramarine blue5.42.86.4
Cerulean blue1.80.412.3
Chromium oxide18.44.45.8
Emerald green2.70.86.7
* Error was estimated for each sample by calculating a standard deviation no more higher than 5%.
Table 3. ΔE of organic pigments stretched upon a paper support.
Table 3. ΔE of organic pigments stretched upon a paper support.
PigmentΔE of OF and OS Samples *ΔE of OF Samples Before and After Ageing *ΔE of OS Samples Before and After Ageing *
Safranin23.32.59.6
Scarlet R red12.21.713.1
Carmine4.13.49.5
Phloxine B13.44.712.6
Carmine Naccarat10.73.915.3
Vesuvine12.13.98.7
Dahlia21.04.516.6
Cresyl fast violet27.03.915.2
Gallocyanine3.92.215.5
Cochineal4.27.98.3
Crocein scarlet8.12.310.4
* Error was estimated for each sample by calculating a standard deviation no more higher than 5%.
Table 4. ΔE of inorganic pigments stretched upon a chalk support.
Table 4. ΔE of inorganic pigments stretched upon a chalk support.
PigmentΔE of OF and OS Samples *ΔE of OF Samples Before and After Ageing *ΔE of OS Samples Before and After Ageing *
Terra di Siena4.20.72.5
Yellow ochre4.60.25.6
Cadmium yellow2.23.13.6
Cadmium red17.31.76.8
Indian red1.12.93.4
Raw umber11.25.48.1
Burnt umber16.12.914.4
Ivory black5.61.911.4
Ultramarine blue4.73.15.3
Cerulean blue2.80.513.8
Chromium oxide17.63.75.1
Emerald green3.80.66.4
* Error was estimated for each sample by calculating a standard deviation no more higher than 5%.
Table 5. ΔE of organic pigments stretched upon a chalk support.
Table 5. ΔE of organic pigments stretched upon a chalk support.
PigmentΔE of OF and OS Samples *ΔE of OF samples Before and After Ageing *ΔE of OS Samples Before and After Ageing *
Safranin20.01.49.8
Scarlet R red10.60.913.5
Carmine4.24.58.4
Phloxine B12.93.913.1
Carmine Naccarat8.94.115.6
Vesuvine12.95.09.0
Dahlia20.03.017.9
Cresyl fast violet31.04.012.1
Gallocyanine3.62.015.4
Cochineal2.95.49.6
Biebrich scarlet7.41.911.1
* Error was estimated for each sample by calculating a standard deviation no more higher than 5%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Agostino, G.; Merra, R.; Badalamenti, N.; Lazzara, G.; Bruno, M.; Sottile, F. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Mucilage-Based Painting Binders for Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914487

AMA Style

D’Agostino G, Merra R, Badalamenti N, Lazzara G, Bruno M, Sottile F. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Mucilage-Based Painting Binders for Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability. 2023; 15(19):14487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914487

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Agostino, Giulia, Rosalia Merra, Natale Badalamenti, Giuseppe Lazzara, Maurizio Bruno, and Francesco Sottile. 2023. "Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Mucilage-Based Painting Binders for Conservation of Cultural Heritage" Sustainability 15, no. 19: 14487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914487

APA Style

D’Agostino, G., Merra, R., Badalamenti, N., Lazzara, G., Bruno, M., & Sottile, F. (2023). Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. and Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. Mucilage-Based Painting Binders for Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability, 15(19), 14487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop