The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- What is the influence of consumer value and consumer reasoning on attitude and intention toward webrooming behavior in an omnichannel retail environment?
- (2)
- Does attitude toward webrooming impact webrooming intention in an omnichannel retail environment?
- (3)
- Is there a mediation effect of behavioral reasoning (for/against) on the association between consumer value and consumer attitude toward webrooming?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT)
2.2. Hypotheses of Study
2.2.1. Webrooming Behaviors
2.2.2. Consumer Value and the Behavioral Reasoning
2.2.3. Consumer Value and Attitude toward Webrooming
2.2.4. ‘Reasons for’, Attitude, and Webrooming Intention
2.2.5. ‘Reasons against’, Attitude, and Webrooming Intention
2.2.6. Attitude and Webrooming Intention
2.2.7. The Mediation Effect Hypothesis
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. The Measurement Scales
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Sample Profile
4.2. Assessment of the Measurement Model
4.2.1. First-Order Reflective Constructs
4.2.2. Second-Order Reflective Constructs
4.3. Assessment of the Structural Model
Mediation Analysis
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Practical Implications
5.4. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Items |
---|---|
Attitude (ATT) | ATT1: For me, it is a good idea to search for information on online channels but purchase fashion apparel products from physical stores. |
ATT2: For me, it is beneficial to search for information on online channels but purchase fashion apparel products from physical stores. | |
ATT3: For me, it is wise to search for information on online channels but purchase fashion apparel products from physical stores. | |
ATT4: For me, it is pleasant to search for information on online channels but purchase fashion apparel products from physical stores. | |
Webrooming intention (INT) | INT1: I am likely to collect information for fashion apparel products online before buying them offline. |
INT2: It is probable that I will collect information for fashion apparel products online before buying them offline. | |
INT3: I am certain that I will collect information for fashion apparel products online before I buy offline. | |
Haptic Evaluation (HE) | HE1: I feel more comfortable in purchasing fashion apparel products after physically examining it. |
HE2: I would only buy fashion apparel products if I could touch them before purchase. | |
HE4: I feel more confident making fashion apparel products’ purchase after touching the product. | |
Immediate Possession (IP) | IP1: I would rather buy fashion apparel products at an offline store than order them online. |
IP2: When I order fashion apparel product, I do not want to wait for it to arrive. | |
IP3: Whenever I purchase fashion apparel product, I want to use it immediately. | |
Cost Saving (CS) | CS1: Online shopping for fashion apparel products saves me money. |
CS3: Online shopping for fashion apparel products offers me the competitive prices. | |
CS4: Online shopping for fashion apparel products provides me with attractive promotional offers. | |
Product Assortment (PA) | PA1: Online shopping offers me access to a variety of fashion apparel merchandise. |
PA2: Online shopping offers me access to many brands of fashion apparel products. | |
PA3: Online shopping offers me access to wide assortment of fashion apparel products. | |
Hedonic Value (HV) | HV1: Purchasing fashion apparel products increases my happiness. |
HV2: Purchasing fashion apparel products excites me personally. | |
HV3: I always enjoy purchasing fashion apparel products. | |
Utilitarian Value (UV) | UV1: I believe fashion apparel products are of superior quality. |
UV2: Fashion apparel products are well designed. | |
UV3: Fashion apparel products last longer. |
References
- Flavián, C.; Gurrea, R.; Orús, C. Combining Channels to Make Smart Purchases: The Role of Webrooming and Showrooming. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleinlercher, K.; Linzmajer, M.; Verhoef, P.C.; Rudolph, T. Antecedents of Webrooming in Omnichannel Retailing. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 606798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boardman, R.; McCormick, H. Shopping Channel Preference and Usage Motivations: Exploring Differences amongst a 50-Year Age Span. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2018, 22, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iglesias-Pradas, S.; Acquila-Natale, E. The Future of E-Commerce: Overview and Prospects of Multichannel and Omnichannel Retail. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 656–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, S. eCommerce in the Web3 Era. In The E-commerce Era [Working Title]; Intech Open: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Aw, E.C.-X.; Basha, N.K.; Ng, S.I.; Ho, J.A. Searching Online and Buying Offline: Understanding the Role of Channel-, Consumer-, and Product-Related Factors in Determining Webrooming Intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herhausen, D.; Kleinlercher, K.; Verhoef, P.C.; Emrich, O.; Rudolph, T. Loyalty Formation for Different Customer Journey Segments. J. Retail. 2019, 95, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafar, S.; Yaqub, R.M.S. Consumer Intention towards Webrooming Behavior in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual Framework Based on Behav-ioral Reasoning Theory. Sustain. Bus. Soc. Emerg. Econ. 2022, 4, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, N.V. What Are Connected Shoppers Doing and Not Doing Online? 2016. Available online: https://www.nielsen.com/ssa/en/insights/article/2016/what-are-connected-shoppers-doing-and-not-doing-online/ (accessed on 14 September 2022).
- Verhoef, P.C.; Kannan, P.; Inman, J.J. From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing. Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, S.; Sahney, S. Webrooming Behavior: A Conceptual Framework. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2017, 45, 762–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aw, E.C.-X. Understanding the Webrooming Phenomenon: Shopping Motivation, Channel-Related Benefits and Costs. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 1074–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Sousa, P.R.; Barbosa, M.W.; de Oliveira, L.K.; de Resende, P.T.V.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Moura, M.T.; Matoso, D. Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned: Sustainability in Brazilian Omnichannel Retail. Sustainability 2021, 13, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adivar, B.; Hüseyinoğlu, I.Ö.Y.; Christopher, M. A quantitative performance management framework for assessing om-nichannel retail supply chains. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 48, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krueger, J. Omni-Channel Shoppers: An Emerging Retail Reality. Think with Google. 2015. Available online: http://think.storage.googleapis.com/docs/omni-channel-shoppers-an-emerging-retail-reality.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).
- Chatterjee, P. Multiple-channel and Cross-channel Shopping Behavior: Role of Consumer Shopping Orientations. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2010, 28, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, S.; Sahney, S. Examining Consumers’ Webrooming Behavior: An Integrated Approach. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2019, 37, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, A.; Jain, S. Factors Affecting Luxury Consumers’ Webrooming Intention: A Moderated-Mediation Approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westaby, J.D. Behavioral Reasoning Theory: Identifying New Linkages Underlying Intentions and Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2005, 98, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahu, A.K.; Padhy, R.; Dhir, A. Envisioning the Future of Behavioral Decision-Making: A Systematic Literature Review of Behavioral Reasoning Theory. Australas. Mark. J. 2020, 28, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claudy, M.C.; Peterson, M. Understanding the Underutilization of Urban Bicycle Commuting: A Behavioral Reasoning Perspective. J. Public Policy Mark. 2014, 33, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philos. Rhetor. 1975, 6, 244–245. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/249008 (accessed on 10 January 2023). [CrossRef]
- Gilal, F.G.; Jian, Z.; Paul, J.; Gilal, N.G. The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: An integrative review and agenda for marketing research. Eur. Manag. J. 2018, 37, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagger, M.S.; Chatzisarantis, N.L.D.; Biddle, S.J.H. A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2002, 24, 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Arora, N. Consumer Adoption of M-Banking: A Behavioral Reasoning Theory Perspective. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2017, 35, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, R.; Sivathanu, B. An Empirical Study on the Adoption of M-learning Apps among IT/ITeS Employees. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2018, 15, 182–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrero-Crespo, A.; Viejo-Fernández, N.; Collado-Agudo, J.; Sanzo Pérez, M.J. Webrooming or showrooming, that is the question: Explaining omnichannel behavioural intention through the technology acceptance model and exploratory behavior. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2022, 26, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Motyka, S.; Levy, M. The Evolution and Future of Retailing and Retailing Education. J. Mark. Educ. 2018, 40, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, H.; Baig, U.; Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I.; Ahmed, H. Factors Effecting Omnichannel Customer Experience: Evidence from Fashion Retail. Information 2022, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gensler, S.; Verhoef, P.C.; Böhm, M. Understanding Consumers’ Multichannel Choices across the Different Stages of the Buying Process. Mark. Lett. 2012, 23, 987–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N.; Dospinescu, O. Word-of-Mouth Engagement in Online Social Networks: Influence of Network Centrality and Density. Electronics 2023, 12, 2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, M.S.; Siddiqui, U.A.; Khan, M.A.; Alkandi, I.G.; Saxena, A.K.; Siddiqui, J.H. Creating Electronic Word of Mouth Credibility through Social Networking Sites and Determining Its Impact on Brand Image and Online Purchase Intentions in India. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1008–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spencer, J. 65+ Social Networking Sites You Need to Know about. 2020. Available online: https://makeawebsitehub.com/social-media-sites/ (accessed on 8 October 2022).
- Banerjee, N.; Dutta, A.; Dasgupta, T. A study on customers’ attitude towards online shopping—An Indian perspective. Indian J. Mark. 2010, 40, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
- Manss, R.; Kurze, K.; Bornschein, R. What Drives Competitive Webrooming? The Roles of Channel and Retailer Aspects. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2020, 30, 233–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ananda, A.S.; Hanny, H.; Hernández-García, A.; Prasetya, P. ‘Stimuli Are All around’—The Influence of Offline and Online Servicescapes in Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 524–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotler, P.; Kartajaya, H.; Setiawan, I. Marketing 4.0: Moving from Traditional to Digital; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz, S.H. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2012, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szmigin, I.; Carrigan, M.; O’Loughlin, D. Integrating Ethical Brands into Our Consumption Lives. J. Brand Manag. 2007, 14, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, S.; Thompson, K.E.; Engelken, J.; Huntley, K. Mapping the Values Driving Organic Food Choice. Eur. J. Mark. 2004, 38, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claudy, M.C.; Mark Peterson, M.; O’Driscoll, A. Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems. Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory. J. Macromarketing 2013, 33, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claudy, M.C.; Garcia, R.; O’driscoll, A. Consumer Resistance to Innovation—A Behavioral Reasoning Perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 528–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büttner, O.B.; Florack, A.; Göritz, A.S. Shopping Orientation and Mindsets: How Motivation Influences Consumer Information Processing During Shopping. Psychol. Mark. 2013, 30, 779–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, R.; Lang, B.; Diego, J.S. How Gender Affects the Relationship between Hedonic Shopping Motivation and Purchase Intentions? J. Consum. Behav. 2014, 13, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avnet, T.; Higgins, E.T. Response to Comments on “How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions”. J. Mark. Res. 2006, 43, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Barcellos, M.D.; Bossle, M.B.; Perin, M.G.; Vieira, L.M. Consumption of Eco-Innovative Food: How Values and Attitudes Drive Consumers’ Purchase of Organics? Rev. Bras. Mark. 2015, 14, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, S.; Sahney, S. Consumer’s Webrooming Conduct: An Explanation Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2018, 30, 1040–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gensler, S.; Neslin, S.A.; Verhoef, P.C. The Showrooming Phenomenon: It’s More than Just About Price. J. Interact. Mark. 2017, 38, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehra, A.; Kumar, S.; Raju, J.S. Competitive Strategies for Brick-and-Mortar Stores to Counter “Showrooming”. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 3076–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peck, J.; Childers, T.L. To Have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments. J. Mark. 2003, 67, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Benito, Ó.; Martos-Partal, M.; Martín, S.S. Brands as Substitutes for the Need for Touch in Online Shopping. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 27, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C.; Gurrea, R.; Orús, C. Feeling Confident and Smart with Webrooming: Understanding the Consumer’s Path to Satisfaction. J. Interact. Mark. 2019, 47, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, O.; Zhu, X.; Liu, W. A study of the pyjamas purchasing behaviour of Chinese consumers in Hangzhou, China. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2008, 12, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, E.; Taylor, C.R.; Sung, H.; Lee, J.; Wagner, U.; Navarro, D.M.-C.; Wang, F. Global marketing segmentation usefulness in the sportswear industry. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hugo, A.H.; Van-Aardt, A.M. Evaluative criteria applied by South African female fashion consumers when purchasing casual daywear. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2012, 36, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mintel. Fashion Online—UK—August 2014. Mintel Oxygen. Available online: http://academic.mintel.com/display/679743/ (accessed on 29 November 2022).
- Park, E.-J.; Kim, E.-Y. Effects of consumer tendencies and positive emotion on impulse buying behavior for apparel. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 2008, 32, 980–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitsme. How Fit is Online Fashion? Consumer Attitudes towards Clothes Shopping Online. White Paper. 2014. Available online: http://fits.me/resources/whitepapers/ (accessed on 18 October 2022).
- Noble, S.M.; Griffith, D.A.; Weinberger, M.G. Consumer Derived Utilitarian Value and Channel Utilization in a Multi-Channel Retail Context. J. Bus. Res. 2005, 58, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohm, A.J.; Swaminathan, V. A Typology of Online Shoppers Based on Shopping Motivations. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, A.; Yadav, R.; Gupta, M.; Jebarajakirthy, C. How Does Online Engagement Drive Consumers’ Webrooming Intention?: A Moderated-Mediation Approach. JGIM 2021, 29, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhar, R.; Wertenbroch, K. Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. JMR 2000, 37, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, E.J.; Kim, E.Y.; Funches, V.M.; Foxx, W. Apparel Product Attributes, Web Browsing, and e-Impulse Buying on Shopping Websites. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1583–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eastman, J.K.; Iyer, R.; Shepherd, C.D.; Heugel, A.; Faulk, D. Do they shop to stand out or fit in? The luxury fashion purchase intentions of young adults. Psychol. Mark. 2018, 35, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tandon, A.; Dhir, A.; Kaur, P.; Kushwah, S.; Salo, J. Behavioral reasoning perspectives on organic food purchase. Appetite 2020, 154, 104786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ram, S.; Sheth, J.N. Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions. J. Consum. Mark. 1989, 6, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talwar, S.; Dhir, A.; Kaur, P.; Mäntymäki, M. Barriers toward purchasing from online travel agencies. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 89, 102593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Arora, N. Understanding Determinants and Barriers of Mobile Shopping Adoption using Behavioral Reasoning Theory. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodur, H.O.; Klein, N.M.; Arora, N. Online Price Search: Impact of Price Comparison Sites on Offline Price Evaluations. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Park, M.J. An Examination of the Effect of Consumer Personal Traits on Show Rooming Behavior: The Effect of Product Type. J. Internet Commer. 2019, 18, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fassnacht, M.; Unterhuber, S. Consumer Response to Online/Offline Price Differentiation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 28, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapp, A.; Baker, T.L.; Bachrach, D.G.; Ogilvie, J.; Beitelspacher, L.S. Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self-efficacy and performance. J. Retail. 2015, 91, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Zhang, T.; Tayi, G.K. Inroad into Omni-Channel Retailing: Physical Showroom Deployment of an Online Retailer. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2019, 283, 676–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heitz-Spahn, S. Cross-channel free-riding consumer behavior in a multichannel environment: An investigation of shopping motives, sociodemographics and product categories. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2013, 20, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menon, S.; Kahn, B.E. The Impact of Context on Variety Seeking in Product Choices. J. Consum. Res. 1995, 22, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, C.; Yen, H.J.R.; Li, E.Y. Exploring consumer value of multi-channel shopping: A perspective of means-end theory. Internet Res. 2012, 22, 318–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konus, U.; Verhoef, P.C.; Neslin, S.A. Multichannel shopper segments and their covariates. J. Retail. 2008, 84, 398–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J. Does Greater Online Assortment Pay? An Empirical Study Using Matched Online and Catalog Shoppers. J. Retail. 2016, 92, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alba, J.; Lynch, J.; Weitz, B.; Janiszewski, C.; Lutz, R.; Sawyer, A.; Wood, S. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Mark. 1997, 61, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, S.S.; Till, B.D. Evaluation of Search, Experience and Credence Attributes: Role of Brand Name and Product Trial. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2002, 11, 417–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berner, R. Retail: This rising tide won’t lift all boats. Bus. Week 2004, 3865, 114. [Google Scholar]
- Verhagen, T.; van Dolen, W. Online Purchase Intentions: A Multi-Channel Store Image Perspective. Inf. Manag. 2009, 46, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, M.M.; Remus, W. Uses and gratifications and acceptance of Web-based information services: An integrated model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 38, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basha, M.B.; Lal, D. Indian Consumers’ Attitudes towards Purchasing Organically Produced Foods: An Empirical Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.C.C. Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore. Telemat. Inform. 2005, 22, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tufail, H.S.; Yaqub, R.M.S.; Alsuhaibani, A.M.; Ramzan, S.; Shahid, A.U.; Refat, M.S. Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Suboptimal Food Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory: A Food Waste Reduction Strategy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, H.S.; Taylor, S.F.; James, Y.S. “Migrating” to New Service Providers: Toward a Unifying Framework of Consumers’ Switching Behaviors. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2005, 33, 96–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.brandsynario.com (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, Fifth Edition. Available online: www.pearsoned.co.uk (accessed on 15 November 2022).
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, W.W.; Peterson, R.A.; Brown, S.P. Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2008, 16, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Rigdon, E.E.; Straub, D. Editor’s Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research. MIS Q. 2011, 35, iii–xiv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oakes, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Plan. 2013, 46, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.-Y.M. Showrooming, Webrooming, and User-Generated Content Creation in the Omnichannel Era. J. Internet Commer. 2018, 17, 145–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westaby, J.D.; Probst, T.M.; Lee, B.C. Leadership Decision-Making: A Behavioral Reasoning Theory Analysis. Leadersh. Q. 2010, 21, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, U.-J.; Niehm, L.S.; Russell, D.W. Exploring Perceived Channel Price, Quality, and Value as Antecedents of Channel Choice and Usage in Multichannel Shopping. J. Mark. Channels 2011, 18, 79–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, J.; Casidy, R. The Role of Brand Reputation in Organic Food Consumption: A Behavioral Reasoning Perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunneman, A.; Verhoef, P.C.; Sloot, L.M. The moderating role of shopping trip type in store satisfaction formation. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 78, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, P.; Riley, F.D.; Riley, D.; Hand, C. Online and Store Patronage: A Typology of Grocery Shoppers. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2017, 45, 419–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, S.; Sarmah, T. Omni-Channel Retailing: The Opulent Blend Moving Towards a Customer. J. Arts Sci. Commer. 2015, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, S.; Gonçalves, H.M. Multichannel Consumer Behaviors in the Mobile Environment: Using FsQCA and Discriminant Analysis to Understand Webrooming Motivations. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sit, J.K.; Hoang, A.; Inversini, A. Showrooming and retail opportunities: A qualitative investigation via a consumer-experience lens. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 40, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dekimpe, M.G.; Geyskens, I.; Gielens, K. Using Technology to Bring Online Convenience to Offline Shopping. Mark. Lett. 2020, 31, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Females | 238 | 51.7 |
Males | 222 | 48.2 | |
Age | 18–25 years | 326 | 70.8 |
26–35 years | 81 | 17.6 | |
36–45 years | 43 | 9.3 | |
46–55 years | 10 | 2.2 | |
Marital status | Married | 113 | 24.5 |
Unmarried | 347 | 75.4 | |
Education | Bachelor | 225 | 48.9 |
Diploma or equivalent | 6 | 1.3 | |
High school | 10 | 2.2 | |
Master | 175 | 38.0 | |
Others | 20 | 4.3 | |
PhD | 24 | 5.2 | |
Work status | Businessman | 19 | 4.1 |
Government employee | 62 | 13.5 | |
Private employee | 36 | 7.8 | |
Student | 314 | 68.3 | |
Unemployed | 29 | 6.3 | |
Income per month (PKR) | 100,001–150,000 | 34 | 7.3 |
25,001–50,000 | 65 | 14.1 | |
50,001–100,000 | 61 | 13.3 | |
Above 150,000 | 30 | 6.5 | |
Less than 25,000 | 270 | 58.7 |
First-Order | Outer | Cronbach’s | Composite | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constructs | Items | Loadings | Alpha | Reliability (CR) | AVE |
ATT | ATT1 | 0.84 | |||
ATT2 | 0.854 | 0.868 | 0.91 | 0.716 | |
ATT3 | 0.863 | ||||
ATT4 | 0.827 | ||||
INT | INT1 | 0.856 | |||
INT2 | 0.888 | 0.844 | 0.906 | 0.763 | |
INT3 | 0.876 | ||||
HE | HE1 | 0.859 | |||
HE2 | 0.801 | 0.765 | 0.865 | 0.68 | |
HE4 | 0.813 | ||||
IP | IP1 | 0.752 | |||
IP2 | 0.758 | 0.638 | 0.805 | 0.579 | |
IP3 | 0.773 | ||||
HV | HV1 | 0.864 | |||
HV2 | 0.881 | 0.83 | 0.898 | 0.746 | |
HV3 | 0.846 | ||||
UV | UV1 | 0.842 | |||
UV2 | 0.834 | 0.78 | 0.871 | 0.693 | |
UV3 | 0.821 | ||||
CS | CS1 | 0.716 | |||
CS3 | 0.829 | 0.714 | 0.839 | 0.636 | |
CS4 | 0.841 | ||||
PA | PA1 | 0.856 | |||
PA2 | 0.842 | 0.806 | 0.886 | 0.721 | |
PA3 | 0.849 |
ATT | CS | HE | HV | INT | IP | PA | UV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | 0.846 | |||||||
CS | 0.388 | 0.797 | ||||||
HE | 0.562 | 0.353 | 0.825 | |||||
HV | 0.518 | 0.378 | 0.422 | 0.864 | ||||
INT | 0.719 | 0.427 | 0.497 | 0.534 | 0.873 | |||
IP | 0.485 | 0.398 | 0.456 | 0.436 | 0.531 | 0.761 | ||
PA | 0.499 | 0.579 | 0.434 | 0.463 | 0.491 | 0.449 | 0.849 | |
UV | 0.507 | 0.437 | 0.453 | 0.608 | 0.558 | 0.444 | 0.445 | 0.832 |
Constructs | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|
Reasons for (RF) | 0.706 | 0.836 | 0.629 |
Reasons against (RA) | 0.776 | 0.869 | 0.689 |
Consumer Values | 0.756 | 0.891 | 0.804 |
Attitude | Intention | Reasons against | Reasons for | Consumer Values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude | 0.846 | ||||
Intention | 0.721 | 0.874 | |||
Reasons against | 0.503 | 0.52 | 0.888 | ||
Reasons for | 0.614 | 0.602 | 0.542 | 0.853 | |
Consumer Values | 0.571 | 0.608 | 0.543 | 0.574 | 0.897 |
Hypotheses | Paths | (β) | Std. Errors | t-Value | p-Value | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1(a) | CV → RF | 0.574 | 0.037 | 15.392 | 0.0000 | Supported |
H1(b) | CV → RA | 0.543 | 0.047 | 11.477 | 0.0000 | Supported |
H2 | CV → ATT | 0.275 | 0.058 | 4.733 | 0.0000 | Supported |
H3(a) | RF → ATT | 0.375 | 0.053 | 7.095 | 0.0000 | Supported |
H3(b) | RF → WI | 0.201 | 0.055 | 3.649 | 0.0000 | Supported |
H4(a) | RA → ATT | 0.15 | 0.065 | 2.33 | 0.0100 | Rejected (due to direction) * |
H4(b) | RA → WI | 0.147 | 0.049 | 3.021 | 0.0010 | Rejected (due to direction) ** |
H5 | ATT → WI | 0.524 | 0.05 | 10.549 | 0.0000 | Supported |
Paths | Effect | Std. Error | p Values | Type of Mediation |
---|---|---|---|---|
H6: Consumer Value → ‘Reasons for’ → Attitude | 0.215 | 0.034 | 0.000 | Partial Mediation |
H7: Consumer Value → ‘Reasons against’ → Attitude | 0.082 | 0.035 | 0.018 | Partial Mediation |
Paths | β | p Value |
---|---|---|
Consumer Value → Attitude | 0.297 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zafar, S.; Badghish, S.; Yaqub, R.M.S.; Yaqub, M.Z. The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014852
Zafar S, Badghish S, Yaqub RMS, Yaqub MZ. The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments. Sustainability. 2023; 15(20):14852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014852
Chicago/Turabian StyleZafar, Sarah, Saeed Badghish, Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub, and Muhammad Zafar Yaqub. 2023. "The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments" Sustainability 15, no. 20: 14852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014852
APA StyleZafar, S., Badghish, S., Yaqub, R. M. S., & Yaqub, M. Z. (2023). The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments. Sustainability, 15(20), 14852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014852