Next Article in Journal
First Report of Microplastic Ingestion in Edible Fish along Moroccan Mediterranean Coasts
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrolases Control Soil Carbon Sequestration in Alpine Grasslands in the Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Green Technology Choice for Firms under an Emission Trading Scheme: End-of-Pipe vs. Cleaner Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Amide Fertilizer on Carbon Sequestration under the Agroforestry System in the Eastern Plateau Region of India
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Topsoil Carbon Content and Quality in a Peatland and Reforested Soil after 50 Years of Soil Restoration in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain)

by
Marco A. Jiménez-González
1,*,
Sana Boubehziz
2,
Ana M. Álvarez
1,
Pilar Carral
1,
María José Marqués-Pérez
1,
Sameh K. Abd-Elmabod
3,4 and
Gonzalo Almendros
5
1
Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28049 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Agronomy, Universidad de Córdoba (UCO), 14071 Córdoba, Spain
3
Soils and Water Use Department, Agricultural and Biological Research Institute, National Research Centre (NRC), Cairo 12622, Egypt
4
Agriculture and Food Research Council, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Cairo 11562, Egypt
5
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(23), 16312; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316312
Submission received: 27 September 2023 / Revised: 15 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emission)

Abstract

:
The increase in atmospheric CO2 levels and the advance of desertification due to soil degradation across our planet is becoming one of humanity’s most serious concerns. The restoration and development of soil management techniques are becoming widespread tools to protect soils. The Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain) is an area that has suffered historically severe deforestation, but it was reforested in an extensive program 50 years ago. In this study, an evaluation of the soils in the restored area was carried out. For this purpose, the chemical composition of the different soil organic matter fractions was characterized using infrared and UV-vis spectroscopies. The results showed a large increase in carbon stocks in the topsoil (0–10 cm) (about 30 Mg·ha−1 more than the area not reforested) after reforestation 50 years ago. There was also an increased level of transformation of organic carbon into resilient humic structures, which are resistant to degradation. Reforestation activities within the National Park have greatly increased the humification rates of organic matter, resulting in the accumulation of high-quality organic carbon.

1. Introduction

The Earth’s environmental situation is becoming very worrying, with the increase in greenhouse gases, especially CO2, causing global warming of more than 1.2 °C in the last century [1]. In this whole problem, the soil has an important role, because soils are among the largest carbon reservoirs on the planet after the oceans [2,3]. For this reason, preventing soil degradation is crucial for mitigating environmental issues resulting from excessive emissions of these types of gases with the loss of organic matter.
Soil conservation and its protection against degradation is becoming one of the most important objectives worldwide. This has led to strong international initiatives, such as the “4per1000” initiative [4]. The advance of desertification is a global world problem due to several aspects [5]. On the one hand, there is the loss of fertile soils, both natural and cultivated, along with the associated environmental and socio-economic problems that this fact generates, and, on the other hand, there is the emission of CO2 to the atmosphere due to the degradation of the soil organic matter (SOM). These facts have increased interest in this problem, and some researchers have focused on SOM stabilization pathways, organo-mineral interactions, and chemical stability [6,7,8,9], while others have focused on evaluating the impact of different soil management practices on SOM content and quality [10,11,12,13]. Finally, all of them have the common objective of shedding light on stabilization pathways to prevent the loss of this carbon and to better understand the transformation mechanisms.
The restoration of degraded soils is one of the potential tools to combat the advance of desertification while enhancing carbon sequestration and fertility [3]. It is necessary to evaluate the impact of reforestation on the soil, particularly regarding carbon sequestration and the transformation of SOM. In this respect, the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park in Spain, where extensive reforestation was undertaken in the early 1970s, provides an ideal scenario to compare the chemical evolution and carbon sequestration in reforested and non-reforested areas. In addition, this area is of special interest due to the peatlands that are also found in it, which are important due to their carbon storage capacity and their vulnerability to prolonged drought scenarios that can degrade these areas.
The SOM has a complex chemical composition and a chaotic structure that remains obscure. However, its structure retains fingerprints of the processes and conditions that have affected its evolution [14,15]. Different SOM fractions can be isolated based on their solubility at varying pH values: fulvic acid (FA) is soluble in alkaline and acidic solutions, humic acid (HA) is only soluble in alkaline pH, and humin is insoluble. HA is of special interest in all of these fractions because it is one of the most transformed fractions and usually the most abundant and easy to isolate and purify. This fraction may provide information about the humification processes reflected in its chemical structure [10,11]. The study of the chemical composition of SOM and its fractions is important to understand its degree of transformation and stability, for which several techniques have been developed [11,12]. Among all of the analytical techniques, there are two that have given us a good idea about the degree of transformation of organic carbon: UV-visible spectroscopy and infrared (IR) spectroscopy. In UV-visible spectroscopy, the wavelengths 465 nm (E4) and 665 nm (E6) have been widely used to provide a global idea about the transformation degree of the HA fraction [8]. The ratio E4/E6 is accepted as an index that indicates the evolution and condensation degree of SOM [8,16,17]; more transformed organic matter gives low values in this ratio, while more labile and fresh organic matter shows a high value of E4/E6. An analysis using IR spectroscopy gives a more detailed view of the chemical structure of SOM and can help to assess structural variability under different forms of soil management or environmental conditions. Several bands studied using IR can give information about functional groups in the HA chemical structure, i.e., important bands, such as 1720 and 1620 cm−1, which are characteristic of carboxylic groups and aromatic carbons, respectively [18].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of reforestation to accumulate organic carbon in the soil and to study the evolution and transformation degree of this organic carbon in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). This work will provide a good approximation of the effect of this reforestation after 50 years on the quality and quantity of organic matter on the surface of the area under study, in addition to evaluating the quality of the organic matter of an adjacent peatland due to its great interest as a potential carbon reservoir.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling

The study area is located in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain), and sampling was carried out in the specific area called “Puerto de la Morcuera” (40°49′36″N; 3°50′7″W) at 1770 m a.s.l (Figure 1). Gneiss is the dominant geological substrate throughout the area, and two main soils have been sampled in the study area—Gleyic Histic Umbrisol and Fibric Histosol—according to WRB [19]. The study area was selected because the reforested and non-reforested soils were similar and the profile was not altered in the reforestation process, while in other areas with steeper slopes, it was modified by terracing. Following Koppen’s climate classification, the area has a Dsc climate type, where the temperature of the coldest month is below −3 °C and that of the warmest month is above 10 °C, with short and dry summers. Three soils were sampled: one soil under forest vegetation (F) resulting from reforestation that took place more than 50 years ago, with a planting density of about 7 m between trees, mainly with Pinus sylvestris; another adjacent soil, which is still deforested (D), with only herbaceous vegetation and some isolated mountain scrub; and, finally, a peatland (P) located in the same area. Natural vegetation in the area is typical of high-altitude scrubland, with species like Cytisus purgans or Juniperus communis and herbaceous vegetation adapted to cold winters and high-speed winds (Amaryllidaceae and Poaceae). The percentage of course elements in the area is 2.5%, except in the case of the Histosol, where coarse elements were lacking in the topsoil. The herbaceous vegetation in the reforested area was the same, but with a reduced population. Three spatial replicates were sampled at each site, with sampling points 20 m apart, and all soil samples were taken from the topsoil (depth of 0–10 cm). Five separate subsamples were collected at every point (four at the corners of a 2 m side square and the fifth in the center). Finally, all subsamples were combined and homogenized with a total weight of 1 kg. The sites were selected in an attempt to achieve approximately 4% uniformity of slope across the area. The soil samples were transported to the laboratory, air-dried, and then sieved to 2 mm for further analysis.

2.2. Soil Characterization

Soil pH was determined using a 1:2.5 soil:water suspension. To determine the electrical conductivity (EC), a 1:5 suspension of soil:water was used. For the peatland samples, the determination of pH and EC was carried out directly in the field. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was analyzed using the Walkley and Black method based on wet oxidation using potassium dichromate in acid medium and then using Mohr’s salt solution to quantify the reacted dichromate [20]. Soil texture was determined for the surface horizon of the Umbrisol (horizon A) following the Bouyoucos method [21]. However, it was not possible to determine the soil texture for the Histosol as it consisted of organic soil. The water holding capacity (WHC) was determined for each soil by wetting by capillarity for 24 h, followed by a 2 h drainage period at atmospheric pressure. Finally, the water content was determined by weighing. The bulk density was also determined using the core method for all of the soils sampled. Cylinders of 7 cm in diameter were introduced into the soil to obtain a sample of the unaltered soil structure. The soil weight was obtained after drying them in the laboratory at 105 °C for 24 h. The SOC stock per hectare was calculated based on information on the SOC content, bulk density, and depth (10 cm) considered in this investigation.

2.3. Isolation and Characterization of Humic Substances

To extract soil humic substances (FAs and HAs), we began the process by using 0.1 M Na4P2O7 and stirring in a reducing atmosphere. The mixture was centrifuged after stirring, and the supernatant extract was collected. The procedure was repeated once more with a 0.1 M Na4P2O7 solution, and then with 0.1 M NaOH until a clear extract was obtained. The obtained extract was acidified using 6 M HCl, resulting in the precipitation of HAs, which were later separated from FAs through centrifugation. Once the HAs were isolated, they were redissolved in 0.1 M NaOH and centrifuged at high speed (18,000 × g) to sediment the clays and separate them from the HAs. Finally, to complete the purification of HAs, they were precipitated again with 6 M HCl and dialyzed (Visking tube size 6, Medicell International Ltd., London, UK) to eliminate all soluble salts. The quantification of organic carbon for each fraction was performed by taking aliquots, drying them, and subsequently analyzing them using the Walkley and Black method, as described above [20].
The optical density E4 and E6 of the humic extract (HE), composed of FAs and HAs, was determined at 465 and 665 nm in HE solutions in 0.01 M NaOH at 0.05 mg C·cm−3. The analysis was conducted using a spectrophotometer GENESYS 150 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Optical density at 272 nm (OD272) was also measured, as previous research has indicated a correlation with the degree of condensation of humic substances [22,23].
The infrared spectra were obtained using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) in a Cary 630 FTIR (Agilent) spectrometer. The wavelength range was 4000–400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The spectra baseline was corrected, and a resolution enhancement of the spectra was carried out following the protocol described by Almendros et al. [24]. This was performed to enable a clearer visualization of the bands. Finally, a semiquantitative analysis of the characteristic bands was conducted using the second derivative of the spectra. Several bands were selected for this study due to their importance in the chemical structure of organic matter [18,25,26]: the band at 1720 cm−1 is associated with carboxyl groups, the aromatic structures are represented by the bands at 1620 and 1510 cm−1 and the group of bands related to the structure of lignin (1510, 1420, 1380, 1270, 1230, and 1130 cm−1) and, finally, the band at 1030 cm−1 is related to polysaccharide structures [18].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A statistical test of analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups was performed using Statistica ver. 7.1 software to evaluate significant differences. For an early assessment of the potential connections between soil properties, such as the SOC content, and the chemical properties of the SOM fractions, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA). The soil properties and the normalized intensities of the principal IR bands measured in the second derivative were used for the PCA using Statistica ver. 7.1 software.
Finally, a third statistical analysis was carried out using cluster analysis. This analysis used the 1-Pearson correlation index to measure linkage distances. The proximity of the variables is related to the correlations between them, and those located closely together reveal a high correlation.

3. Results

3.1. Soil Properties

The general results of the soil properties analysis are shown in Table 1. All soils present acid pH, but a difference has been observed in the case of peatland, where the lowest acidity is present, which is possibly due to the washing effect of the water in this humid location. This effect can also be observed in the EC, with the lowest EC of 11.3 µS·cm−1 in the peatland and higher values in the reforested area (80.6 µS·cm−1) and deforested area (52.6 µS·cm−1). The highest value of WHC was observed in the peatland, followed by the forest and the deforested soil, with values of 722, 95 and 72%, respectively. The soil in the forested and deforested areas is classified as loamy sand based on texture. The highest SOC content was found in the peatland (30.5%), followed by reforested soil (8.4%) and, finally, deforested soil (7.0%). In the results of the estimated SOC stock per hectare, we can see that the sequence is consistent. However, in this case, the stock in the reforested area shows values close to the peatland stock, and it is 35.5 Mg·ha−1 higher than the SOC stock of deforested soil.

3.2. Organic Carbon Characterization

The values of the different fractions isolated from the SOM are presented in Table 2. We see a notable difference between the amount of HE in peatlands (26.7 g C·100 g SOC−1) and other soils, but no significant differences are observed between reforested and deforested soils, for which the values are 52.1 and 55.0 g C·100 g SOC−1, respectively. A similar trend is observed for the content of FA and HA fractions. The characterization of humic substances through UV-visible spectroscopy revealed significant differences between the three soil types. The highest OD272 value is found in the reforested soil (2.658 absorbance units, AU), indicating the high degree of condensation of the chemical structure of humic substances (Figure 2) [22,23]. A less condensed HE structure is found in the peatland (1.651 AU), while the HE extracted from the topsoil of deforested area shows a moderate degree of condensation (2.029 AU). The E4/E6 values behave inversely to the values at 272 nm mentioned above. The highest value, which corresponds to a lower degree of organic matter transformation, is found in the peatland (5.828). The reforested soil presents the lowest E4/E6 value (4.385), and the next is the deforested soil, with a value for the ratio of 5.207 (Figure 2).
Figure 3 shows the IR spectra of the HA isolated from the different soil samples. Figure 3a displays the original IR spectra, while Figure 3b depicts the spectra obtained after the resolution enhancement. The HA replicates from each soil demonstrate a notably comparable spectrum. On the one hand, it is apparent after visual inspection that the bands relating to carboxyl groups and aromatic carbon (1720 and 1620 cm−1, respectively) are more prominent in the HA extracted from the reforested and deforested soils, whereas in the peatland, these bands are less notable. On the other hand, the lignin-associated bands are more pronounced in peatland HA compared to the other soils, particularly the band at 1030 cm−1, which is linked to polysaccharides.
The PCA biplot is presented in Figure 4, and it shows that the first two factors account for 83.78% of the overall inertia of the variables in the plane. Two well-defined clusters formed by the variables can be observed. Two distinct variable clusters are evident, with the first comprising bands 1510, 1420, 1380, 1270, 1230, 1130, and 1030 cm−1, linked to the lignin structure, SOC content, and the E4/E6 ratio. The second group comprises the HE content, the OD272, and the bands 1720 and 1620 cm−1, which are associated with carboxylic groups and aromatic carbon, respectively. The latter group exhibits clear indications of significant SOM transformation and level of humification. By examining the sample positions in the biplot, it is evident that the peatland samples are significantly influenced by variables related to fresh organic matter, while both the reforested and deforested soil samples are situated adjacent to variables indicating increased humification; in particular, scores for samples from the reforested area are located near the eigenvector for the 1720 cm−1 band and the values of OD272.
The cluster analysis results are consistent with those obtained through the PCA (Figure 5). Two main clusters are distinguished by their IR bands; one comprises the bands associated with the lignin structure, while the other is characterized by carboxyl and aromatic structures. The SOC content shows an outstanding correlation with both WHC and pH, and all of these variables are correlated with the IR bands at 1510, 1420, 1380, 1270, 1230, 1130 and 1030 cm−1 (bands associated with the lignin pattern) and the E4/E6 ratio. The EC, OD272, and HE content correlate well with the 1720 and 1620 cm−1 bands, which are associated with the more transformed SOM.

4. Discussion

The reforestation process has exhibited positive progress in organic carbon sequestration compared to the deforested regions. After 50 years, the SOC stocks in the topsoil have increased by 35.5 Mg·ha−1 compared to the area that was not reforested. Although peatland is the largest organic carbon reservoir, it is also highly labile, making it extremely susceptible to environmental changes, such as marked declines in the water table or high temperatures that may stimulate mineralization processes [27]. These facts have been evident in several variables analyzed during the chemical characterization of the SOM. The HE content is widely used to explore the humification rate [28]. It has been seen that the peatland showed much lower humification rates compared to the other soils. This is consistent with the waterlogged conditions, which favor anaerobic environments that inhibit microbial activity and thus the rapid transformation of organic matter, resulting in decreased FA and HA contents [29,30]. These results are supported by both the E4/E6 data and the OD272. The peatland’s HE exhibits the highest E4/E6 values, which indicates a lower level of transformation and limited polymerization or molecular weight, and it is accompanied by low values of OD272, which shows a low degree of aromaticity [22,23]. The organic matter of the reforested soil showed the lowest E4/E6 values and the highest OD272. This suggests that carbon sequestration has increased in the topsoil, and the degree of humification in the area has also improved after 50 years of reforestation. In brief, this area of the National Park stores more carbon, and the carbon is more chemically stable. The reforestation of the area has had a positive effect on the improvement of the SOM content and its quality, at least within the first 10 cm. This confirms earlier research that showed a correlation between enhanced diversity in the natural environment and increased organic matter transformation [31,32]. This range of diversity presents a challenge in agricultural soils, which are often monocultures, and carbon sequestration processes typically store less humified and more labile carbon. This issue can be addressed by implementing vegetation covers that improve carbon storage and increase biodiversity while also enhancing the humification process in relation to the mineralization of organic matter [31,32,33]. Therefore, the restoration of natural ecosystems is crucial, as it allows for the manipulation of biodiversity, thus leading to a more stable increase in organic carbon levels in the soil.
The analysis of the chemical structure of HA using IR spectroscopy revealed variations in the organic matter evolution among the different soils. HA isolated from the peatland exhibited a conspicuous pattern of lignin structures and an abundance of carbohydrate-derived structures. These findings suggest a low level of humification reflected by the similarity of the IR patterns to those typical in fresh vegetation [25,26]. On the contrary, the structures observed in the other soils display more aromatic structures, and they are enriched with carboxyl groups, indicating a more advanced state of transformation. All of these facts suggest that SOC storage is strongly linked to peatland conditions, but this accumulation is primarily due to a very labile carbon. In comparison, other soils have less carbon but are more evolved and stable. Consequently, certain properties, such as WHC, are highly correlated with SOC content due to the importance of organic matter for soil structure and water retention.
All of these findings illustrate the importance of restoring damaged natural habitats. The advancement of innovative soil management techniques facilitates the increase in carbon levels in soils and improves their properties [34,35]; however, it is crucial to consider accumulating resilient carbon structures that can endure extreme climatic conditions. Not only should we consider the amount of organic carbon, but also its quality and stability, as they are important factors.
It is worth noting that this study has focused on the topsoil, because it is where the first changes in organic matter can be observed. However, changes could be taking place in deeper layers. This fact could be an object of study for future research because the carbon stock in the deep layers is of great interest, and its chemistry could vary in different scenarios.

5. Conclusions

After 50 years, the reforestation initiative of Sierra de Guadarrama National Park has yielded exceptional SOC sequestration outcomes in the topsoil. The reforestation of the study region with Pinus sylvestris resulted in an estimated increase of 35.5 Mg·ha−1 in the initial 10 cm compared to the non-reforested area. Furthermore, the process of reforestation had a significant impact on the transformation and stabilization of organic carbon in the soil, resulting in a more aromatic and polymerized structure.
These processes for restoring soil have been deemed of great importance in soil conservation, not only due to their high level of carbon storage but also because of their ability to stabilize carbon, which can be difficult to achieve in other scenarios, such as with agricultural soils. This can open a range of possibilities in the study of new soil management not only in forest soils, but also in agricultural soils, where the beginning of the use of cover crops can allow for achieving greater stabilization in addition to increasing the organic carbon stock.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.J.-G. and A.M.Á.; methodology, M.A.J.-G.; software, S.B. and S.K.A.-E.; validation, P.C. and M.J.M.-P.; formal analysis, S.K.A.-E. and P.C.; investigation, M.A.J.-G.; resources, M.J.M.-P.; data curation, M.A.J.-G. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.J.-G.; writing—review and editing, M.A.J.-G., A.M.Á., G.A., P.C., S.B., S.K.A.-E. and M.J.M.-P.; visualization, M.A.J.-G. and G.A.; supervision, M.A.J.-G. and G.A.; project administration, A.M.Á. and M.A.J.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wuebbles, D.J.; Fahey, D.W.; Hibbard, K.A.; DeAngelo, B.; Doherty, S.; Hayhoe, K.; Horton, R.; Kossin, J.P.; Taylor, P.C.; Waple, A.M.; et al. Executive summary. In Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment; Wuebbles, D.J., Fahey, D.W., Hibbard, K.A., Dokken, D.J., Stewart, B.C., Maycock, T.K., Eds.; U.S. Global Change Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 12–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, P. Soils and climate change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 4, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 2004, 123, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. 4per1000. Available online: https://4p1000.org/?lang=en (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  5. Seely, M.; Dirkx, E.; Hager, C.; Klintenberg, P.; Roberts, C.; von Oertzen, D. Advances in desertification and climate change research: Are they accessible for application to enhance adaptive capacity? Glob. Planet. Change 2008, 64, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gregorich, E.G.; Gillespie, A.W.; Beare, M.H.; Cutin, D.; Sanei, H.; Yanni, S.F. Evaluating biodegradability of soil organic matter by its thermal stability and chemical composition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 91, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niu, B.; Chen, O.; Jiao, H.; Yang, X.; Shao, M.; Wang, J.; Si, G.; Lei, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, G.; et al. Networks of mineral-associated organic matter fractions in forest ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 898, 165555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Knicker, H. Stabilization of N-compounds in soil and organic-matter-rich sediments—What is the difference? Mar. Chem. 2004, 92, 167–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gabriel, C.E.; Kellman, L.; Prest, D. Examining mineral-associated soil organic matter pools through depth in harvested forest soil profiles. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Savarese, C.; Xiong, L.; Drosos, M.; Vitaglione, P.; Scopa, A.; Piccolo, A. The impact of long-term field experiments under different cropping systems on the molecular dynamics and stability of the soil Humeome. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 331, 107928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panettieri, M.; Jiménez-González, M.A.; de Sosa, L.L.; Almendros, G.; Madejón, E. Chemical diversity and molecular signature of soil humic fractions used as proxies of soil quality under contrasted tillage management. Span. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 11, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amaleviciute-Volunge, K.; Volungevicius, J.; Ceponkus, J.; Platakyte, R.; Mockeviciene, I.; Slepetiene, A.; Lepane, V. The impact of profile genesis and land use of Histosol on its organic substance stability and humic acid quality at the molecular level. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pizzeghello, D.; Francioso, O.; Concheri, G.; Muscolo, A.; Nardi, S. Land use affects the soil C sequestration in alpine environment, NE Italy. Forests 2017, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiménez-González, M.A.; Álvarez, A.M.; Carral, P.; González-Pérez, J.A.; Almendros, G. Climate variability in Mediterranean ecosystems is reflected by soil organic matter pyrolytic fingerprint. Geoderma 2020, 374, 114443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. San-Emeterio, L.M.; Jiménez-Morillo, N.T.; Pérez-Ramos, I.M.; Domínguez, M.T.; González-Pérez, J.A. Changes in soil organic matter molecular structure after five-years mimicking climate change scenarios in a Mediterranean savannah. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Senesi, N.; Schnitzer, M. Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 1977, 41, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adiyah, F.; Michéli, E.; Csorba, A.; Weldmichael, T.G.; Gyuricza, C.; Ocansey, C.M.; Dawoe, E.; Owusu, S.; Fuchs, M. Effects of landuse change and topography on the quantity and distribution of soil organic carbon stocks on Acrisol catenas in tropical small-scale shade cocoa systems of the Ashanti region of Ghana. Catena 2022, 216, 106366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Senesi, N.; D’Orazio, V.; Ricca, G. Humic acids in the first generation of EUROSOILS. Geoderma 2003, 116, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legend for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No.106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bouyoucos, G.J. The hydrometer as a new method for the mechanical analysis of soils. Soil Sci. 1927, 23, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Traina, S.J.; Novak, J.; Smeck, N.E. An ultraviolet absorbance method of estimating the percent aromatic carbon content of humic acids. J. Environ. Qual. 1990, 19, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, M.; Wu, F.; Yi, Y.; Han, Z.; Wang, Z. Optical Properties of Dissolved Organic Matter and Controlling Factors in Dianchi Lake Waters. Water 2019, 11, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Almendros, G.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martín, F.; Fründ, R.; Lüdemann, H.-D. Solid state NMR studies of fire-induced changes in the structure of humic substances. Sci. Total Environ. 1992, 117–118, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fengel, D.; Wegener, G. Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  26. Derkacheva, O.; Sukhov, D. Investigation of Lignins by FTIR Spectroscopy. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 265, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Antala, M.; Juszczak, R.; van der Tol, C.; Rastogi, A. Impact of climate change-induced alterations in peatland vegetation phenology and composition on carbon balance. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 827, 154294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ciavatta, C.; Govi, M.; Antisari, L.V.; Sequi, P. Characterization of humified compounds by extraction and fractionation on solid polyvinylpyrrolidone. J. Chromatogr. A 1990, 509, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kalisz, B.; Lachacz, A.; Glazewski, R. Transformation of some organic matter components in organic soils exposed to drainage. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2010, 34, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Heller, C.; Zeitz, J. Stability of soil organic matter in two northeastern German fen soils: The influence of site and soil development. J Soils Sediments 2012, 12, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muscolo, A.; Settineri, G.; Romeo, F.; Mallamaci, C. Soil Biodiversity as Affected by Different Thinning Intensities in a Pinus laricio Stand of Calabrian Apennine, South Italy. Forests 2021, 12, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mori, A.S.; Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Fujii, S.; Okada, K.-I.; Isbell, F. A meta-analysis on decomposition quantifies afterlife effects of plant diversity as a global change driver. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Buotte, P.C.; Law, B.E.; Ripple, W.J.; Berner, L.T. Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States. Ecol. Appl. 2020, 30, e02039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, X.; Xing, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Gong, W. Effects of land use and cover change (LUCC) on terrestrial carbon stocks in China between 2000 and 2018. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 182, 106333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bonetti, J.A.; Nunes, M.R.; Fink, J.R.; Tretto, T.; Tormena, C.A. Agricultural practices to improve near-surface soil health and crop yield in subtropical soils. Soil Tillage Res. 2023, 234, 105835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park. Sampling points are marked at each site. Green circles represent reforested soils (F), blue triangles represent deforested soils (D), and red squares represent peatlands (P).
Figure 1. Study area in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park. Sampling points are marked at each site. Green circles represent reforested soils (F), blue triangles represent deforested soils (D), and red squares represent peatlands (P).
Sustainability 15 16312 g001
Figure 2. Concentrations and spectroscopic parameters of humic extract (HE) from reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P) soils. OD272: Optical density at 272 nm. E4/E6: Ratio between optical densities at 465 and 665 nm.
Figure 2. Concentrations and spectroscopic parameters of humic extract (HE) from reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P) soils. OD272: Optical density at 272 nm. E4/E6: Ratio between optical densities at 465 and 665 nm.
Sustainability 15 16312 g002
Figure 3. Infrared spectra of purified humic acid (HA) extracted from reforested soil (F in green), deforested soil (D, blue), and peatland (P, red). (a) Original spectra. (b) Resolution-enhanced spectra. The box with a dashed line indicates the region with bands characteristic of lignin.
Figure 3. Infrared spectra of purified humic acid (HA) extracted from reforested soil (F in green), deforested soil (D, blue), and peatland (P, red). (a) Original spectra. (b) Resolution-enhanced spectra. The box with a dashed line indicates the region with bands characteristic of lignin.
Sustainability 15 16312 g003
Figure 4. Biplot obtained through principal component analysis; soil samples are represented with green circles: reforested soil (F), deforested soil (D), and peatland (P). Variables used to perform the PCA are represented with red circles: SOC, E4/E6, HE, OD272, and the wavenumbers in the infrared spectra (1720, 1620, 1510, 1420, 1380, 1270, 1230, 1130 and 1030 cm−1). The biplot suggests two main clusters: the first embraces variables related to well-transformed organic matter (yellow cluster), while the second (blue cluster) includes variables associated with relatively more fresh organic matter.
Figure 4. Biplot obtained through principal component analysis; soil samples are represented with green circles: reforested soil (F), deforested soil (D), and peatland (P). Variables used to perform the PCA are represented with red circles: SOC, E4/E6, HE, OD272, and the wavenumbers in the infrared spectra (1720, 1620, 1510, 1420, 1380, 1270, 1230, 1130 and 1030 cm−1). The biplot suggests two main clusters: the first embraces variables related to well-transformed organic matter (yellow cluster), while the second (blue cluster) includes variables associated with relatively more fresh organic matter.
Sustainability 15 16312 g004
Figure 5. Cluster analysis of the soil variables, including the intensities of the infrared bands of the HAs using the 1-Pearson correlation index to determine linkage distances.
Figure 5. Cluster analysis of the soil variables, including the intensities of the infrared bands of the HAs using the 1-Pearson correlation index to determine linkage distances.
Sustainability 15 16312 g005
Table 1. General characteristics of samples from reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P) soils (0–10 cm). The standard deviation is shown next to the mean value of the variables. The percentages are expressed with respect to the weight of the soil, except for the particle size fraction (clay, silt, and sand) percentages, which are presented in relation to the content of the total mineral particle. Different letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 1. General characteristics of samples from reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P) soils (0–10 cm). The standard deviation is shown next to the mean value of the variables. The percentages are expressed with respect to the weight of the soil, except for the particle size fraction (clay, silt, and sand) percentages, which are presented in relation to the content of the total mineral particle. Different letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
SamplepH1 EC (µS·cm−1)2 WHC (%)Bulk Density (g·cm−3)Clay (%)Silt (%)Sand (%)3 SOC (%)SOC Stock (Mg·ha−1)
F14.1181.2901.1420769.5104.2
F24.7270.21000.95420768.075.7
F34.7290.5961.11420767.684.4
Mean F4.52 a ± 0.3580.6 a ± 10.295 a ± 51.05 a ± 0.094 ± 020 ± 076 ± 08.4 a ± 188.1 a ± 14.6
D14.6359.9690.81416806.048.8
D24.6348.9730.77416806.449.3
D34.6849.1750.81416807.459.7
Mean D4.65 a ± 0.0352.6 b ± 6.372 a ± 30.80 b ± 0.024 ± 016 ± 080 ± 07.0 b± 1.352.6 b ± 6
P15.5912.05990.40n.dn.dn.d27.6110.2
P25.5814.08170.34n.dn.dn.d30.3103.0
P35.678.07500.28n.dn.dn.d33.694.2
Mean P5.61 b ± 0.0511.3 c ± 3.1722 b ± 1120.34 c ± 0.06n.dn.dn.d30.5 c ± 3102.5 a ± 8
1 EC: Electrical conductivity; 2 WHC: Water holding capacity; 3 SOC: Soil organic carbon.
Table 2. General characteristics of humic extract (HE) isolated from the different soils samples (0–10 cm): reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P). The standard deviation is shown next to the mean value of the variables. Different letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 2. General characteristics of humic extract (HE) isolated from the different soils samples (0–10 cm): reforested (F), deforested (D), and peatland (P). The standard deviation is shown next to the mean value of the variables. Different letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05.
Sample1 HE (g C·100 g SOC−1) 2 FA (g C·100 g SOC−1)3 HA (g C·100 g SOC−1)4 OD272 (AU)5 E4/E6
F147.28.738.52.9294.337
F250.810.740.12.5994.393
F358.111.246.92.4454.424
Mean F52.1 a ± 5.610.2 a ± 1.341.9 a ± 4.52.658 a ± 0.2474.385 a ± 0.044
D159.413.745.71.8625.417
D251.014.536.51.9265.013
D354.79.445.32.2985.193
Mean D55.0 a ± 4.212.5 a ± 2.742.5 a ± 5.22.029 b ± 0.2355.207 b ± 0.202
P133.57.026.51.7246.021
P227.44.922.51.7065.544
P319.14.814.41.5235.921
Mean P26.7 b ± 7.25.6 b ± 1.321.1 b ± 6.21.651 c ± 0.1115.828 c ± 0.252
1 HE: Humic extract; 2 FA: Fulvic acid; 3 HA: Humic acid; 4 OD272: Optical density at 272 nm; 5 E4/E6: Ratio between optical densities at 465 and 665 nm.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiménez-González, M.A.; Boubehziz, S.; Álvarez, A.M.; Carral, P.; Marqués-Pérez, M.J.; Abd-Elmabod, S.K.; Almendros, G. Evaluation of Topsoil Carbon Content and Quality in a Peatland and Reforested Soil after 50 Years of Soil Restoration in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). Sustainability 2023, 15, 16312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316312

AMA Style

Jiménez-González MA, Boubehziz S, Álvarez AM, Carral P, Marqués-Pérez MJ, Abd-Elmabod SK, Almendros G. Evaluation of Topsoil Carbon Content and Quality in a Peatland and Reforested Soil after 50 Years of Soil Restoration in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). Sustainability. 2023; 15(23):16312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiménez-González, Marco A., Sana Boubehziz, Ana M. Álvarez, Pilar Carral, María José Marqués-Pérez, Sameh K. Abd-Elmabod, and Gonzalo Almendros. 2023. "Evaluation of Topsoil Carbon Content and Quality in a Peatland and Reforested Soil after 50 Years of Soil Restoration in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain)" Sustainability 15, no. 23: 16312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316312

APA Style

Jiménez-González, M. A., Boubehziz, S., Álvarez, A. M., Carral, P., Marqués-Pérez, M. J., Abd-Elmabod, S. K., & Almendros, G. (2023). Evaluation of Topsoil Carbon Content and Quality in a Peatland and Reforested Soil after 50 Years of Soil Restoration in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain). Sustainability, 15(23), 16312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop