Next Article in Journal
The Effects of the Biophilic Atmosphere on Hedonic Value, Utilitarian Value, and Customer Loyalty
Previous Article in Journal
Eye-Tracking Studies on Sustainable Food Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach

1
Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Sustainable Real Estate Research Center, Department of Economics and Finance, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, North Point, Hong Kong 999077, China
3
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Material Engineering—DICAM, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
4
Department of Computer Science, University of Turin, 10149 Turin, Italy
5
Department of Construction Engineering and Management, National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
6
Descon Engineering Limited, Kasur Road Sufiabad, Lahore 54760, Pakistan
7
Romanian Academy, Center for Financial and Monetary Research, Victor Slăvescu, 050711 Bucharest, Romania
8
Research Department, Romanian American University, 012101 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(23), 16436; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436
Submission received: 5 October 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023

Abstract

:
Construction 4.0 is witnessing exponential growth in digital twin (DT) technology developments and applications, revolutionizing the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) and other emerging technologies used throughout the built environment lifecycle. BIM provides technologies, procedures, and data schemas representing building components and systems. At the same time, the DT enhances this with real-time data for integrating cyber-physical systems, enabling live asset monitoring and better decision making. Despite being in the early stages of development, DT applications have rapidly progressed in the AEC sector, resulting in a diverse literature landscape due to the various technologies and parameters involved in fully developing the DT technology. The intricate complexities inherent in digital twin advancements have confused professionals and researchers. This confusion arises from the nuanced distinctions between the two technologies, i.e., BIM and DT, causing a convergence that hinders realizing their potential. To address this confusion and lead to a swift development of DT technology, this study provides a holistic review of the existing research focusing on the critical components responsible for developing the applications of DT technology in the construction industry. It highlights five crucial elements: technologies, maturity levels, data layers, enablers, and functionalities. Additionally, it identifies research gaps and proposes future avenues for streamlined DT developments and applications in the AEC sector. Future researchers and practitioners can target data integrity, integration and transmission, bi-directional interoperability, non-technical factors, and data security to achieve mature digital twin applications for AEC practices. This study highlights the growing significance of DTs in construction and provides a foundation for further advancements in this field to harness its potential to transform built environment practices. It also pinpoints the latest developments in AI, namely the large language model (LLM) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)’s implications for DT education, policies, and the construction industry’s practices.

1. Introduction

The digital twin (DT hereafter) technology, a game-changing technology in the Industry 4.0 era, is capturing the interest of both industry practitioners and academics across industries. The DT offers the ability to generate real-time virtual representations of physical objects through the integration of live data from sensor devices and operational systems, allowing for ongoing analysis, monitoring, and optimization processes throughout the entire lifecycle of the physical asset [1]. According to a Gartner survey conducted in 2019, 75% of Internet of Things (IoT)-based organizations will use or intend to utilize DT technology by 2020. More than 40% of large enterprises globally are expected to employ this technology in their projects to boost revenue by 2027 [2]. The market share of DTs is increasingly overarching, as mentioned in several market reports; for instance, an increase of USD 24.8 billion, at a 39.5% compound growth rate from 2020 to 2025 annually [3], up to approximately USD 32 billion between 2021 and 2026 [4], and a growth from USD 8 billion in 2022, at about a 25% compound growth rate between 2023 and 2032 annually [1]. Collaboration between business and technology executives is vital for developing future-ready organizations, sustaining long-term and profitable client relationships, and achieving widespread adoption of technology across businesses, which requires optimizing physical operations, linking virtual technologies and systems with physical items, and merging hardware and software elements.
The “Digital Twin” is a rather newly arrived term in the construction industry and represents a cutting-edge technology that is rapidly revolutionizing this sector. It involves replicating various aspects of physical products, built assets, processes, or services in a digital space, providing engineers and practitioners with feedback from the virtual world. DT technology enhances processes and performances in built environment practices, enabling architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms to quickly identify and address physical problems, design superior products, and realize value and advantages more efficiently than it is feasible [5]. In contrast, building information modelling (BIM) technology has embraced widespread adoption during the recent decades. It provides a mature 3D digital representation of assets, encompassing geometric and semantic information [6,7,8]. BIM allows collaboration between various project stakeholders in the AEC sector and extends its adoption throughout the life cycle management of building assets, including the design phase [9], planning [10], construction [11], and facility operations and management phases [12,13]. Recent years have witnessed an increased adoption and advancements of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) agents (such as machine learning, data analytics, and deep learning), the Internet of Things (IoT), and extended reality (XR) technologies (such as mixed reality, augmented reality, and virtual reality, and everything in between), in the AEC sector. These innovations have profoundly influenced the digital transformation of the AEC sector. To effectively compete in this evolving landscape, the growth of BIM needs to be carefully structured to consider people, processes, and the development of these technologies in an increasingly interconnected world [14].

1.1. From BIM to Digital Twins in the Construction Industry

Construction 4.0 demands promises of enhanced efficiency, collaboration, and innovation, which could be relied on by the paradigm shifts of the construction industry’s transition from conventional BIM to rigorous DTs. While BIM methodologies have laid the bases for digitizing construction processes, DTs offer a more comprehensive and dynamic approach that addresses the limitations of former technology and aligns with the demands of Industry 4.0 as well as Construction 4.0. Even though BIM and DTs are essential components of this transition, this evolution is not without its complexities and challenges. BIM has become well-established in the construction industry, with numerous standards, application technologies, and flexible, extensively defined frameworks [15]. However, leveraging dynamic real-time data, big data, IoT, and AI poses significant challenges for BIM. These technologies have been seen as potential solutions to automate processes and incorporate broader contexts in the construction industry [16]. On the other hand, the emerging concept of digital twins holds significant potential to extend beyond BIM and enable the transformation of the entire construction life cycle into digitally driven processes [17]. However, the DT remains in its early stages of development [18]. While digitalization transforms AEC processes and improves efficiency through digital technologies, notable obstacles still exist. Thus, the strengths of the BIM and DT, or harnessing BIM’s fundamental capabilities to extend the capacities of the DT beyond those of BIM, might be ways forward. For example, a study by [19] proposed a framework for adopting BIM to automate and minimize manufacturing processes, addressing flaws in the digital twin model called BIM Digital Object (BDO). Another study [20] mixed the terms by mentioning that the digital twin (DT) and BIM are now employed in the construction sector as a digitization technique. Some researchers, such as [18], view the DT as a crucial 3D representation of assets that facilitates better operation and maintenance tasks. They also predict that the DT’s data and information storage capabilities will require object-based graph networks maintained through cloud services. Other studies [21,22,23,24] attempt to combine both technologies and explore the potential of leveraging BIM to develop a DT. However, DT technology encompasses multiple systems, IoT devices, and networks for data collection and analytics, introducing complexity that differentiates it from BIM and extends its capabilities.

1.2. Components of Digital Twins

The development and evolution of the DT concept in the construction sector encompass a range of critical technologies, components, and core elements that collectively enable the creation and utilization of dynamic virtual replicas of physically built assets. Several crucial components, including BIM technology, contribute to the development of DT technology, enabling its full potential to automate and optimize AEC operations. These components evolve alongside the advancements in digital technology, data analytics, and connectivity, shaping how DTs are employed in construction practices. While the static BIM models often lead to an underutilization of data, incompetent practices, and ineffective decision making, they serve as a starting point for the advancement of digital twins in the construction environment. DT technology continues to evolve in the construction sector, relying on various base components, such as technologies, maturity levels, data layers, and functionalities, depending on the specific application. In their work, Attaran et al. [1,25] highlight four primary technologies—Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and extended reality (XR)—used for the collection of real-time data, information extraction, and the development of digital representations. The DT relies on data from physical sensors provided by the IoT. This data allows for the creation of a digital clone of a physical entity, continuously updated in real time. IoT plays a central role in all DT applications, forming the foundation of this technology. Cloud computing is essential for DTs, as it stores and processes the data required for DTs. It offers the advantage of data accessibility from any location, reduces computation times, and handles vast amounts of data, contributing to the efficiency of DTs. AI enhances DTs by offering advanced analytical tools. AI can automatically conduct data analytics, provide valuable insights, predict outcomes, and offer recommendations. It utilizes expert systems, artificial neural networks, deep learning, and machine learning to improve the capabilities of DTs. Immersive technologies, such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR), collectively referred to as extended reality (XR), further expand the capabilities of DTs. XR bridges the gap between the physical and virtual worlds, creating coexisting virtual objects that interact with real-world objects in real time.
Another study by Qi et al. [5] presents a five-dimensional model for the cutting-edge technology of DTs, emphasizing its complex systems and lengthy processes that have yet realized their full potential. Song et al. [22] recently decomposed the complexity and maturity of DTs in terms of the information level derived from collected digital data. They provide a numerical characterization and representation of information maturity across five levels, including digital mirror, shadow, twin, and cognitive and autonomous DTs [26]. Hence, the development and evolution of DT technology in the AEC sector hinges on a multidisciplinary approach that comprises numerous parameters and components. It is essential to summarize these fragmented components clearly, reducing confusion and complexity and promoting a better understanding of DT elements among industry professionals and academia.

1.3. Widespread Adoption of Digital Twins in the Construction Industry

DT technology works as a digital representation that mimics real-world objects using causality, virtualized sensing, material qualities, and the laws of physics. Due to the fast digital transformation occurring across several industries, DT technology and its applications in the AEC sector have garnered significant attention from academics and industry. The AEC sector’s fast-paced adoption of digitalization [27], including DTs, is observing a phenomenal surpass from BIM to DTs because of their transformative potential and a paradigm shift toward data-driven decision making. As such, the widespread expansion in DT applications in the construction industry is beyond BIM’s capabilities, which provide real-time insights, continuous monitoring, and dynamic simulations throughout an asset’s lifecycle. For instance, DTs can support iterative design and simulation through a project’s lifecycle, unlike the BIM’s static representation of the built asset [28]. Operations and maintenance (O&M) data can be linked with the BIM for real-time data-driven facilities management (FM) during a building’s life cycle, which is usually a costly and time-consuming approach for large-scale built assets [29].
On the other hand, DTs enable continuous monitoring of assets through numerous embedded sensors, allowing real-time data collection on various aspects of infrastructure facilities. This proactive approach of DTs to real-time monitoring and maintenance ensures timely interventions and minimizes downtime [30,31]. Moreover, the virtual DT models usually reflect the geometry of the as-built physical products, which optimizes the construction operations on site. Using a three-dimensional geometry of the physical product that is constructed, the DT identified the surface parameters. Then, the DT updated the B-Rep component to allow its surface parameters to match the physical product structures [32]. In the case of operational optimization [33,34,35], DTs enable real-time optimizations of operations by analyzing data streams from sensors and adjusting parameters in real time, thus enhancing the performance of building units. During the current era of digital and green shifts in the built environment, resource consumption and utilization are monitored by DTs more effectively, allowing for data-driven optimizations of energy, material usage, and water, which support sustainability goals by identifying areas for improvement [20,36].
It could be argued that the widespread adoption of DT technologies and applications in the construction industry goes beyond static BIM representations by offering continuous monitoring, predictive capabilities, real-time optimizations, and a holistic understanding of assets throughout their lifecycles. Therefore, the expanding capabilities of DTs hold great potential for improving data management and decision making on-site, leading to enhanced efficiency in construction and asset management operations.

1.4. Ethical and Social Implications of Using Digital Twins in the Construction Industry

The DT relies on a wide array of sensor data, including images, videos, positional information, environmental parameters, and mechanical data. However, the collection of such diverse data raises concerns about site privacy and security. Additionally, the DT processes sensitive project and asset data, necessitating measures to ensure data privacy, protect against cybersecurity threats, and comply with data-related regulations. To safeguard DT data and prevent unauthorized access, it is imperative to develop software with a strong focus on security and quality. This ensures the integrity, reliability, and security of digital twin data, making it suitable for critical applications in various domains [37,38]. A governance framework is essential in providing guidelines and best practices for DTs. It outlines data security, privacy, and ethical guidelines, promoting responsible and transparent DT implementations. Addressing concerns about data ownership, access, sharing, and usage rights is crucial for maintaining trust and ethical use of a DT. Implementing industry standards and governance frameworks encourages collaboration among stakeholders, facilitating the exchange of information, expertise, and best practices. This, in turn, drives improvements in projects and enhances the overall efficiency. Standardized methods and governance frameworks support the long-term sustainability of the DT in a rapidly evolving construction industry [38].

1.5. Examples of Digital Twin Application for On-Site Construction

The DT creates virtual representations of physical buildings in the real world using a variety of IT tools [39], and practices can vary significantly. For instance, in a construction project spanning Italy, Poland, and Finland, IoT technology was employed to capture data and link a three-dimensional model with real-time data. Additionally, ontology techniques were used to consolidate information from various decentralized sources, and were integrated with BIM tools, ranging from rapid building mapping to construction management. This approach facilitated seamless information exchange among different applications, mappings, and data sources. It offered stakeholders the ability to access a shared platform for visualizing data, resulting in reduced project timelines, error prevention, process improvements, and enhanced performance monitoring throughout their construction projects [40].
In the US, the DT concept plays a crucial role in capturing the geometric characteristics of physical assets in their corresponding virtual environments. This process begins with the reconstruction of a three-dimensional dense point cloud, using the data gathered from images. Leveraging technologies such as multi-view stereo and structure-from-motion, a dense point cloud model is created, essentially forming a virtual replica of construction sites, which serves as the digital twin model. The structure-from-motion framework involves several key steps: (1) extracting local feature descriptors, such as scale-invariant feature transform, from complete images; (2) establishing pairwise matches among feature descriptors in different images to calculate the fundamental matrix and determine the camera viewpoints from which the data were collected; and (3) performing triangulation to estimate the location of pairwise matches in three-dimensional coordinates, resulting in a sparse point cloud model. The multi-view stereo system is then utilized to populate the sparse point cloud using the collected images. This process initially divides the images into patches and employs an iterative matching, enlargement, and screening approach to enhance the point cloud resolution. The resulting point cloud model is subsequently analyzed for reconstruction purposes at construction sites [41].

1.6. Research Significance

The increasing complexity associated with DTs necessitates a comprehensive understanding of its major components to enable practical contributions from researchers and practitioners toward its ongoing development. While a few studies have attempted to address this need by summarizing DT applications and components, they either focused on a single DT component or took a broad perspective encompassing multiple industries. For instance, Ozturk G. B. [42] conducted a bibliometric analysis of literature research on DT employment in the AECO-FM industry, providing a general summary of state-of-the-art DT applications. Liu et al. [35] reviewed DT concepts, applications, and technologies, primarily focusing on summarizing DT applications across different industrial phases. Deng et al. [43] presented a taxonomy of BIM to DT development levels within specific applications and domains, such as construction processes, building energy performance, and indoor environment monitoring, thereby limiting the scope of their critical review. In a recent study [44], a holistic review was conducted on the technologies and applications of the DT concept in the AEC sector. This study also aimed to clarify the differences between the BIM and DT and provided an extensive overview of the emerging technologies used in DT development, albeit with a significant focus on digital data modeling and transmission domains. However, the previous review studies have yet to achieve a comprehensive view of the key components of DT technology and applications in the construction sector, which is the primary objective of this paper. Furthermore, the current advancements in DT technology present significant technological challenges that warrant further emphasis from a research standpoint.
This study aims to comprehensively examine and summarize the current literature about DT development and application in the construction sector. This research focuses on five significant components: technologies, maturity levels, data layers, enablers, and functionalities. To ensure a thorough exploration of the existing literature, a step-by-step mixed method is employed, utilizing keyword-based searches in various databases. The retrieved research articles are then subjected to content analysis to refine their relevance to this study. Additionally, this paper aims to contribute to the existing research by providing an in-depth perspective on DT applications and the constituent parts that comprise their capacity. This includes elucidating how modeling, simulation, monitoring, and visualization tools are integrated with the DT to form its fundamental elements.

1.7. Research Questions and Objectives

This systematic literature review primarily focuses on exploring the answers to the research questions (RQs) provided below:
  • (RQ1) What are the key components and elements responsible for developing and evolving the digital twin concepts and applications in the AEC industry?
  • (RQ2) What are the existing research gaps and future avenues for research on digital twins in the construction sector?
In order to identify and answer these research questions, the scope of this study was curtailed to address the following research objectives (Ros):
  • (RO1) To systematically analyze the status of research on digital twin developments.
  • (RO2) To clarify the concepts and enhance understanding of key components and elements of digital twins in construction.
  • (RO3) To structure the key constituents that help develop digital twins and their applications in the AEC sector.
  • (RO4) To identify crucial gaps in the existing literature and recommend potential avenues for future research efforts.

2. Materials and Methods for Literature Review

Similar to studies [45,46], this study employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach to retrieve pertinent research records. Subsequently, it performs a systematic literature review to analyze these records. The primary focus of these steps is to discern the key components that contribute to the evolution and advancement of digital twin technology and its applications in the AEC sector. These steps are further complemented by categorizing research records based on key components encompassing the DT technology’s development and applications in the AEC business. As such, the mixed methodology follows a step-by-step holistic approach [47], incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the research materials. This approach addresses previously unanswered review questions while resolving overlapping and complementing issues. The search process is limited to a specific period from 2010 to 2023, as there were minimal publications on digital twins in the AEC sector domain before 2010.

2.1. Classification and Scope Criteria

This study’s primary literature classification criteria are based on pertinent digital twin research techniques, with the primary goal being to clarify the understanding of the DT concept and its applications in the AEC industry. The research method deconstructs, classifies, and summarizes the key components and elements that contribute to the evolution and development of digital twins. These “key components and elements” are essential constituents for DT development and form the significant contribution of this study. They are classified as technologies, maturity levels, data layers, enablers, and functionalities. While some other technologies and tools can enable DT development, such as hardware, devices, cameras, and robots, which aid in understanding the physical entity, they are beyond the scope of this study. The DT use cases and applications that extend to various industries, including manufacturing, automotive, utilities, agriculture, healthcare, and mining. However, this study focuses explicitly on DT applications in the AEC sector and how their development contributes to improving overall productivity through a digital transformation.

2.2. Literature Retrieval and Review Process

The literature search method enables an impartial and repeatable review, significantly influencing the outcomes of a systematic review [48]. This is particularly crucial for emerging topics, such as the DT in the AEC sector, where digital transformation is accelerating. This study adopts a systematic review approach to provide a rigorous overview of the state-of-the-art research on critical elements and components of DT development and its applications in the AEC sector. Similar to previous studies [45,49,50], this study aims to explore and understand DT research via the PRISMA technique. Figure 1 represents a step-by-step process for literature retrieval from popular databases for scientific research, including Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Taylor and Francis, IEEE Xplore, Springer, and ASCE Library. The authors employed specific search strings on these databases to find relevant research on DTs, as Google Scholar is unsuitable for systematic reviews [51].
Step (1). Literature Retrieval: The meticulous search queries used were as follows: (“digital twin” OR “digital twins” OR “virtual twin” OR “digital replica” OR “virtual counterpart” OR “cyber-physical system”) AND (“development” OR “evolution” OR “key technologies” OR “key components” OR “key elements” OR “applications”) AND (“construction engineering” OR “construction” OR “construction sector” OR “AEC industry” OR “construction industry” OR “construction engineering and management”). These queries aimed to retrieve articles published in the DT research field between 2010 and June 2023, covering a substantial number of articles in this research area (the prior period had fewer papers, and there was a considerable change after deep learning was developed). Initially, the Scopus database was targeted for the search, followed by other databases, leading to 885 research records. After employing a screening process for titles and abstracts, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, and removing duplicate and extraneous documents, 110 documents were included in this systematic review.
Step (2). Literature Filtering: This step involves thoroughly reading each article, starting from the abstract and continuing through the introduction and conclusions. This process aimed to identify publications that define the three classes of digital twins: digital model, shadow, and twin. Statistical analyses of the current research state are presented using various graphs and tables.
Step (3). Literature Classification: The third step involves determining the five critical components of DT development and its applications in the AEC business and classifying the research records accordingly. These categories encompass the technologies, maturity levels, data layers, enablers, and functionalities (further elaborated in the findings and discussions section). Table 1 briefly summarizes the steps in reviewing available research on DT developments and applications in the construction industry, including search strings, filtering, inclusions, exclusions, and classifications.

3. Data Extraction and Current State-of-the-Art Analysis

This study adopts a mixed methods approach that combines quantitative and qualitative analyses to address the research objectives. After analyzing the content of research documents and eliminating irrelevant literature, 110 papers were included in this systematic review. The objective was to identify key components and elements contributing to the development and evolution of DT technology in the AEC domain. This study identifies the following five fundamental components and their sub-categories, representing the current state of DT technology advancements in the subject matter:
  • Technologies comprise the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and extended reality (XR).
  • Maturity levels comprise the pre-DT, DT, adaptive, and intelligent DT.
  • Data layers comprise data acquisition, transmission, modeling, integration and fusion layer, and service layer.
  • Enablers comprise service, data, physical and virtual entities, and connection.
  • Functionalities comprise simulation, visualization, prediction, optimization, and monitoring.
These key components are classified based on their significant contribution to the rapid advancement of DT capabilities and their potential to revolutionize the construction industry, addressing critical challenges. Table 2 further provides a summary of some of the eligible articles corresponding to each identified component and its sub-category.
The broader implementation and integration of digital technologies, including AI, IoT, ML, big data analytics, additive manufacturing, robots, and DTs, have given rise to the current era of Industry 4.0 [87]. During its evolution, DT technology has played a crucial role in shaping the future of autonomous construction operations, fostering efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability [88]. Notably, NASA’s adoption of DT-based solutions to develop complex vehicles and aircraft has led to various definitions of this technology applied across industries. Tao et al. [89] has reasonably explained the evolution of DT technology over recent years, starting from the early concept of Grieves up to the 5-D DT model, as shown in Figure 2.
In the context of the AEC sector, understanding the classification of the DT into different classes based on integration and connectivity levels between physical and digital representations is essential. Kritzinger et al. [65] proposed three sub-classes for the DT, providing a clearer understanding: the digital model (DM), which is similar to BIM competencies in the construction industry; the digital shadow (DS), in which real-time data are automatically transmitted from the physical object to their virtual counterpart; and the DT as a digital model with bi-directional automatic exchange of information between the physical asset and its digital counterpart. While the original three-dimensional DT model defined by Grieves [90] remains prevalent, expanding application requirements have given rise to new trends and demands. The DT has extended its reach beyond military and aerospace domains into civilian sectors [92], leading to diverse service demands from various fields and businesses with different objectives. The DT has been characterized in multiple ways, such as a “digital representation” [93], “realistic model” [94], “virtual prototype” [66], “structure of inter-connected digital replicas” [4], and “dynamic virtual model” [95] that captures the characteristics and behavior patterns of a system in the physical world. DT technology, coupled with other emerging technologies, such as sensors, IoT, AI, ML, and XR, can sense real-life experiences in the physical world. Several studies have summarized DT definitions in various industries, including AEC practices, to clarify further and highlight the concept as presented in Table 3.
Unlike other industries, the AEC sector has experienced a reported 1% annual growth rate over the recent two decades, with digitization and innovation being key drivers to enhance productivity [109]. However, the adoption of digital twins in research academia was initially slow until the middle of the 2020s, based on the yearly trend of retrieved publication records. However, since 2017, there has been a significant surge in academic articles on the topic of DTs, indicating a rapid embrace of the concept by academics and practitioners across industries. Figure 3 illustrates the total number of articles returned using the search string explained in Step 1 of the literature retrieval process, compiled from various databases. Moreover, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, Figure 3 compares the final documents using the (TITLE + ABSTRACT + KEYWORDS) strategy to refine the search results further, focusing on relevant articles. Notably, DT applications in the AEC sector are still in the early stages. They have yet to mature throughout the built asset’s lifecycle, including the design, construction, operations, and maintenance phases. Until 2019, literature on DT concepts and paradigm shifts in the AEC sector remained scarce. However, the unexpected surge in DT adoption within the AEC industry by research and practice reflects the technology’s transition from infancy to rapid development. The AEC sector increasingly embraces its digital transformation to enhance productivity and remain competitive among other innovative industries.
Figure 4 provides a status analysis of publication records, highlighting the top journals that published the most digital twin research among articles initially obtained using the search string. Approximately 16% of the initially retrieved publications were published in the Automation in Construction journal, known for its leadership in publishing articles focused on employing digital technologies in the AEC sector. This journal also contributed the most significant percentage of finalized articles, accounting for nearly 25% of all publications. Other top journals with a relatively higher number of relevant publications include the Journal of Cleaner Production, Journal of Building Engineering, Advanced Engineering Informatics, IFAC-PapersOnLine, Energy and Buildings, International Journal of Construction Management, and Construction Management and Economics.
Figure 5 presents an analysis of the distribution of retrieved research records among different disciplines and research domains within the subject matter. Most publications, approximately 34% of the retrieved results, are found in Engineering, followed by Decision Sciences at 19%, Computer Science at 11%, Energy at 9%, and Business Management and Accounting at 7%. Due to its ability to integrate with systems throughout the asset’s life cycle, DT technology plays a crucial role in decision making for various aspects of built assets, such as planning, scheduling, energy, sustainability, and cost management. Additionally, DT research has primarily focused on the engineering and computer-centric domains compared to the social sciences and general management domains. This trend can be attributed to the resources and techniques established in these disciplines, which are well suited for digitalization and automation.

4. Findings and Discussions

This study identifies five key elements and components from the literature that contribute to the development and evolution of DT technology and its applications in the construction sector. The explicit representation of these key elements and components can be seen in Figure 6, demonstrating their significance in facilitating the advancement of the DT and its increasing use in the AEC sector.

4.1. Technologies

According to research by Attaran et al. [1], the DT combines four fundamental technologies (Figure 7) to collect and store real-time data, gather critical information to provide insightful data, and produce virtual representations of physical objects.

4.1.1. Internet of Things (IoT)

This study highlights the Internet of Things (IoT) as a crucial component at the core of every DT application across various industries, which serves diverse use cases. IoT facilitates the connection of a vast network of objects, people, and their interactions. By 2027, more than 90% of IoT platforms are projected to possess digital twinning capabilities, collecting data from real-world objects to create digital replicas for analysis, manipulation, and optimization [1,25]. The real-time virtual representations are continuously updated with data. Integrating IoT and the DT in Construction 4.0 applications revolutionizes various data exchange processes in the AEC sector. IoT contributes to expanding data volume, while the DT utilizes these data to create digital representations, enabling analysis, manipulation, and optimization. This integration leads to advancements in predictive maintenance, fault detection, and other aspects during the facility management phase of built assets, offering better visibility, predictive maintenance, and machine behavior analysis.
The profound integration of big data and IoT with DTs has established an effective network for sharing the data between virtual and physical entities, enhancing automation flexibility, manufacturing efficiency, and productivity throughout the building’s lifecycle. Regarding smart building applications in the AEC sector, IoT plays a fundamental role in unlocking the potential of smart buildings by connecting sensing and actuating devices, enabling information sharing and innovative applications. It leverages standard protocols and the convergence of devices, sensors, and actuators, which contributes to creating DTs for intelligent building analytics and decision making. Furthermore, integrating BIM-based DT capabilities with IoT data sources provides a comprehensive view of assessing the performance of building units [77]. DT high-dimensional models offer high-fidelity representations, while IoT data provides real-time updates from construction processes and operations, including sensor data such as positioning and physical measurements [110]. Accessing both data sources is possible through interfaces, APIs, customized plugins, and open standards. This integration empowers stakeholders to make informed decisions and enhances project efficiency and performance. Thus, integrating IoTs with DTs holds promising revolutions in the construction sector in which the former provides real-time data that enrich the accuracy and functionality of the latter. However, varying data formats and protocols on a daily basis in the digital world could cause challenges in this integration, and seamless scalability and efficient data management become vital concerns.

4.1.2. Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The rise of DTs aligns with the growing trend of digitization and data-driven decision making in the AEC industry. This study explores the industry’s increasing focus on data-centric approaches facilitated by technologies such as AI and ML, resulting in the creation of smart buildings and intelligent cities that optimize performance, sustainability, and user experience. The fusion of AI with DT applications amplifies these two technologies’ potential in the construction sector. AI and DT technologies have become crucial elements in the ongoing digital transformation of the construction sector [22]. AI, which simulates human intelligence, constitutes a core component of DTs, providing advanced analytical tools to analyze data and offer valuable insights [57]. AI-driven DTs can decode complex AEC processes and systems, facilitating decision making and monitoring. They can make predictions and provide suggestions to mitigate potential problems. AI encompasses various disciplines, including robotics, image recognition, and language recognition, and leverages techniques such as neural networks, machine and deep learning, and expert systems to assist DTs in automatically analyzing data, predicting outcomes, and offering suggestions [56].
In the context of the AEC sector, AI implementation is still in its early stages but holds great potential to revolutionize building construction and maintenance. Its application focuses on creating intelligent buildings that respond to the needs of humans and organizations, while machine learning algorithms can analyze sensor data from a building’s components, enabling quick problem diagnosis. Digital twins, with the aid of AI, will continue to evolve, efficiently processing vast amounts of data. AI’s capabilities enable accurate predictions and proactive responses to unexpected circumstances during development or after project completion, enhancing reliability, performance, and cost control throughout the lifecycle of structures and systems. Additionally, autonomous robots can perform repetitive tasks accurately, reducing labor costs [111]. These technologies present opportunities to improve project planning and execution, minimize operational risks, and provide predictive insights for construction activities. In the context of the fourth industrial revolution, particularly in the construction industry, AI connects the physical and virtual worlds, contributing to developing the maturity of DTs [87]. Sophisticated AI/ML algorithms effectively learn from big data, enhancing productivity through quick and accurate data analysis. As a result, AI has garnered significant attention across industries, including AEC. It is a fact that Construction 4.0 practices rely primarily on the availability and quality of the data; thus, the accuracy and efficacy of AI-driven DTs depend heavily on the data integrity that is being ingested. Therefore, the successful integration of both technologies hinges upon a rigorous understanding of both creating and utilizing high-quality data to revolutionize construction industry practices.

4.1.3. Cloud Computing (CC)

This research underscores the significant role of cloud computing (CC) technology in the development and evolution of DT technology, especially within the construction sector’s Construction 4.0 revolution. CC enables efficient storage and access to real-time data collected through IoT sensors deployed on built assets. The continuous data collection and storage over the internet are key advantages of CC, which have resulted in significant cost reductions in design, emulation, scheduling, analytics, and simulation services within the built environment [107]. The combination of CC and IoT has facilitated remote monitoring and training of specific construction and maintenance processes, with high-fidelity virtual representations adapting to real-time changes in the physical environment. Edge computing can be employed for data preprocessing before transmission to the cloud server to handle the massive volumes of data generated by DT-based devices in smart buildings [77]. This preprocessing step helps manage the data efficiently and ensures a seamless flow between physical devices and cloud servers.
As a core component of the DT, CC goes beyond the information flows defined by BIM standards, as it incorporates object-based graph networks using cloud services for data and information storage [112]. This integration enables AEC stakeholders to capture and analyze real-time information from various sources, including sensors, IoT devices, and other data sources. The cloud’s storage and processing capabilities are critical in creating accurate digital replicas of physical assets, forming the foundation of digital twins. Moreover, the computational resources provided by cloud-based digital twins enable complex simulations, data analytics, and artificial intelligence algorithms for predictive and prescriptive analysis [72]. Beyond efficient processing, cloud-based digital twins also support collaboration and information sharing across distributed teams. AEC professionals can access and update digital twin models from anywhere, facilitating seamless collaboration and decision making. The construction stakeholders usually leverage cloud infrastructures to securely store and access vast amounts of real-time data from IoT sensors and various sources and analyze and update digital twins remotely, fostering collaboration and enabling real-time decision making. Several examples of cloud databases used in AEC applications include the Internet, Google Cloud Platform, openHAB cloud, web and BIM cloud databases, Azure Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) DynamoDB, and Alibaba cloud server [113]. However, data privacy and security and the continuous reliability of cloud infrastructures are crucial for maximizing real-time analytics through cloud-enabled DTs.

4.1.4. Extended Reality (XR)

XR, including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR), joins the physical and virtual worlds to enhance our perception of reality. This study identifies XR as an enabling technology for creating DTs, representing physical objects, and providing valuable insights. For instance, in conjunction with the DT, VR allows industry practitioners to immerse themselves in data and find feasible solutions. Similarly, AR empowers connected workers in Construction 4.0 by providing visualizations, reducing errors, and saving time [33]. These immersive technologies complement the DT by rendering digital data with a sense of reality.
In the construction industry, which has been traditionally limited in digitalization, the development of XR brings about the need for new methodologies and technologies to empower users with intuitive interfaces for accessing and displaying DT data. During design and construction operations, operators can overlay 3D and BIM models onto physical objects using AR or MR devices, accessing real-time data feeds and historical maintenance information in context. As XR technologies continue to advance, they are crucial in calibrating building energy efficiencies, performing pose estimation during the construction stage to enhance safety measures, employing object recognition using XR camera devices, and identifying user locations [21]. These applications of XR contribute to the evolution and effectiveness of DT technology within the construction sector. Trained and skillful labor is a crucial problem in the construction industry [12,30], which can be solved by leveraging interactive training scenarios within XR-enabled DTs before the execution of any stage of the AEC project. This can help equip construction workers and design teams with realistic experiences to familiarize themselves with project environments and procedures to enhance the overall productivity. As mentioned earlier, the accuracy of the data sources from sensor devices and BIM/DT models remains a concern. Limitations in the hardware capabilities also hinder the successful integration of XR devices with DTs, which demand seamless mutual alignments.

4.2. Maturity Levels

4.2.1. Pre-Digital Twin

In the construction industry context, the pre-digital twin represents the initial stage of virtual prototyping used in upfront engineering. It is a virtual model of the envisioned system, created before the physical prototype is developed. The primary objective of the pre-digital twin is to identify and address technical risks during the concept design and preliminary design phases, acting as a valuable tool for decision making and risk mitigation [66]. It is worth noting that, like other model-driven approaches, virtual prototyping at this level involves creating a system model early in the design process. However, unlike the final DT system, a virtual prototype is often not utilized to derive the solution to the given problem [25]. Instead, it can be considered an extendable prototype, with the latter potentially contributing to the final system. By establishing the pre-digital twin level, construction projects aim to minimize or mitigate specific technical risks and identify potential issues in the early design stages before the physical prototype is even developed. However, at this stage, the utilization of digital twins is limited, and their capabilities are not fully harnessed. Challenges may arise related to data integration, interoperability, or the lack of comprehensive digital twin platforms. The focus is primarily on understanding the concept, testing feasibility, and exploring possibilities for future adoption.

4.2.2. Digital Twin (DT)

In the construction industry context, the second level of DT maturity (the digital twin) plays a crucial role in monitoring and managing physical assets. This level involves gathering performance, status/condition, and maintenance data from the physical twins of the built asset and updating the corresponding digital models. As a result, it enables informed decision making throughout the entire lifecycle of the built asset or project [1]. It is important to note that at this level, it becomes possible to analyze the behaviors of physical twins in various situations by acquiring condition and maintenance data directly from the physical assets. At this level, the digital twin incorporates the collected data into its virtual system model, faithfully representing the real-world asset [35]. These updates from the physical system support decision-making processes related to technology specification, conceptual and preliminary design, and development. The data collected from sensors installed in the physical world during construction operations or in the case of smart buildings, along with computational elements in the physical twin, encompass crucial information such as status/condition and targeted performance. These data are then transmitted back to the digital twin, enabling them to update its model and maintenance schedule for the physical system. This bi-directional interaction between the digital and physical twins presents ample opportunities for the physical asset to benefit from the knowledge acquired from one or more digital twins, ultimately resulting in the improved real-time performance of the digital models.

4.2.3. Adaptive Digital Twin

The third level of DT maturity (the adaptive digital twin), within the construction industry context, utilizes machine learning to provide real-time planning and maintenance support, as evident from the analyses of the literature. It incorporates a virtual system model of its physical counterpart and employs an adaptive user interface (UI) to synchronize real-time data from the physical entity with the virtual model. This level of DT builds upon the previous digital twin level and utilizes machine learning algorithms based on neural networks to create an adaptive user interface that caters to user preferences under various conditions [1]. Through neural network-based supervised machine learning algorithms, this level captures the preferences and priorities of users or practitioners in different contexts, which are continually updated through real-time data extracted from the physical twin, enabling the twin to adapt to changing conditions. For instance, the adaptive digital twin can continuously monitor and analyze real-time data from sensors embedded within a building’s infrastructure during construction [59]. These data are then utilized to dynamically adjust construction processes, optimize resource allocation, and identify potential issues in real time. The adaptive digital twin facilitates proactive decision making, enhances productivity, and improves construction project outcomes by integrating data from various sources, such as environmental conditions, worker safety metrics, and equipment performance.

4.2.4. Intelligent Digital Twin

The fourth maturity level of digital twins in the construction industry is known as the intelligent digital twin. This advanced level incorporates all the features of the previous three types of digital twins while providing a more sophisticated analysis of the corresponding real-world object, as evident from the analyses of the literature. The intelligent digital twin builds upon the capabilities of the adaptive digital twin by integrating reinforcement learning through machine learning techniques and supervised machine learning methodologies, enabling real-time updates of physical and digital elements [66]. Moreover, it possesses the capability of unsupervised machine learning to identify objects and patterns within the operational environment. It also incorporates reinforcement learning to adapt to uncertain and partially observable surroundings by learning from system and environment states. This high level of autonomy allows the digital twin to conduct an in-depth analysis of performance, maintenance, and monitoring data from its real-world counterpart at a more detailed level. During this level, a vast amount of data is collected from sensors, construction equipment, and worker activities [30]. Advanced AI technologies are utilized to process these data and autonomously optimize construction processes, predict maintenance needs, and proactively identify potential risks or bottlenecks. By combining real-time data with predictive analytics, the intelligent digital twin enables adaptive decision making, enhances efficiency, and maximizes construction project performance. However, the dynamic nature of the heterogeneity and complexity of construction environments demands the development of agile and resilient algorithms capable of real-time adaptations in creating unified and adaptable digital twins.

4.3. Data Layers

The development and evolution of DTs in the construction sector applications involve several interconnected data layers, which are comprehensively studied by Tuhaise et al. [44]. Table 4 summarizes the data layers collected from the literature.

4.3.1. Data Acquisition Layer

The data acquisition layer is the foundation for achieving a comprehensive perception of maintenance decision-making environments. Raw data are usually collected and interacted with in the physical world. Using embedded network devices and interconnected communication technologies, this layer creates a network that allows the maintenance decision environment to be fully observed. This network facilitates the perception and collection of operational status parameters and operational environment data from the target system or equipment, enabling the formation of a virtual connection between physical equipment and their corresponding digital twins [44]. To collect dynamic data from the physical environment, the data acquisition process depends on the intended functionality of the digital twin.
In the context of the AEC sector, IoT sensors and technologies play a crucial role in acquiring digital data from the physical environment. Therefore, sensor data can be obtained from existing building monitoring systems forming the data acquisition layer. For example, in a study by [116], a restful API was employed for the collection of data from the hard-wired sensors of a building management system (BMS). These data included temperature readings, outdoor temperature measurements, temperature-sensitive airflow transmitters, and pressure values. Another study by Cheng J.C.P. et al. [114] developed a methodology to obtain sensor device data from a direct digital control (DDC) system within a network consisting of humidity, temperature, flow rate, and pressure sensors. Moreover, the mechanical data can also be collected using IoT sensor technologies in various applications. For example, regarding a suspension bridge, displacement transducers were utilized to track the saddle’s displacement, and temperature sensors were used to gauge the chain links’ temperatures [115]. Nevertheless, interoperability issues among diverse sensor systems, the sheer volume of data generated from multiple sources, and varying data formats lead to difficulties in aggregating and integrating data into a cohesive structure for analysis and decision making.

4.3.2. Data Transmission Layer

In DT applications, data transmission entails taking raw data from the data acquisition layer and processing and moving it. Usually, a variety of wired and wireless methods are used to transfer the gathered data. In recent emerging advancements in the AEC sector, Wi-Fi, a widely utilized short-range wireless technology, has been applied to numerous applications. These include managing automated heating for smart homes, planning, scheduling, and on-site construction’s real-time synchronization, smart modular integrated construction systems, IoT-based smart maintenance of building facilities, and safety risk analysis during the prefabrication of building units.
The transmission of sensor data from BMS or other data processing systems adopted in the built environment often relies on internet-based communication and protocols such as building automation and control networks (BACnet) [116]. These protocols facilitate data exchange among various equipment, devices, and sensors. Specific communication layer protocols defined by organizations like IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) and IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) are employed as industry standards to ensure effective data transmission. These protocols fit nicely into web applications and IoT frameworks; they may be divided into two categories: file transfer and message protocols. Another widely utilized transmission protocol is HTTP (hypertext transfer protocol). This web messaging protocol supports request/response RESTful web architecture and employs the universal resource identifier (URI) to transmit data to clients from servers, who receive it via specific URIs. In the study by [116], a particular URL from the sensor data API was used to transmit data to the BIM model. Jiang et al. [123] used both the HTTP and socket protocols in their investigation study; the socket protocol is a common way to send data between machines. Furthermore, Lee et al. [117] employed an Azure blockchain platform as an IoT hub to receive GPS data from IoT sensors, which were subsequently transmitted to the as-built BIM model.

4.3.3. Digital Modeling Layer

This layer involves creating a virtual representation of physical entities through digital modeling, which converts physical entities into digital forms efficiently processed, analyzed, and managed by computers. Various measurement techniques, such as laser scanning, laser tape measurement, MR, and photogrammetry, collect relevant information about the physical environment, including geometric structure, state, functionality, time, process, location, and performance. These measurements generate a digital replica that accurately reflects the physical entity.
In the AEC sector, Autodesk Revit has commonly employed software for the 3D modeling of buildings, as highlighted in multiple studies [31,77,114,116]. Other software tools, such as SolidWorks, Autodesk Navisworks, 3D Max, Sketchup 3D, and Rhinoceros6, are also utilized for creating 3D geometric models [73]. Autodesk Civil 3D and Autodesk Revit are employed for road infrastructure, with the former used for generating road models and the latter for sensor modeling within the BIM framework. AECOsim building designer and Autodesk Revit are used to develop models for the geometry at the system, asset, building, and city levels [113]. Sometimes, game development software creates virtual entities for digital twin applications. For example, human avatars were modeled with the help of the Unity game engine and Autodesk 3D Max. Geometric data can be imported into Unity 3D to develop 3D models, and a VR environment was constructed using the Oculus Rift S VR headset, Unity 3D platform, and Oculus Touch Controllers [72]. Furthermore, BIM components specific to the construction site can also be incorporated into the VR environment to model virtual assets for creating DTs for particular purposes. Nonetheless, the development of advanced software tools that enable the creation of detailed and dynamic virtual representations of construction projects and integrating sensor data into these models through real-time monitoring is crucial for the AEC sector to embrace the full potential of DTs.

4.3.4. Data and Model Integration, and Fusion Layer

This layer in DT applications involves a series of stages to transform digital twin data into valuable information. These stages encompass data storage, integration and fusion of data and model, processing, analysis, and data visualization. Big data storage technologies are utilized for digital twin data’s high volume and multi-source nature. Cloud-based computing platforms are commonly employed for their accessibility, scalability, high performance, and management capabilities. The merging of diverse digital twin data from real and virtual environments is accomplished using data fusion techniques [5]. This includes integrating sensor data, such as environmental, mechanical, image, and video, into BIM models to represent real-time status. Customized APIs are developed to facilitate data integration in 3D modeling software platforms.
Advanced technologies are employed to process and analyze digital twin data. Simple data analysis techniques involve comparing measured values against target values/thresholds, visibility analysis, numerical models, and rule-based reasoning. Additionally, AI techniques, including machine learning and deep learning algorithms, are extensively applied for data analysis [44]. Machine learning emerges as the most frequently utilized technique in most previous studies. Data visualization plays a crucial role in digital twin applications. Therefore, 3D modeling software platforms are used for visualizing temporal sensor data. Autodesk Forge and some gaming environment platforms are extensively employed in some studies to visualize sensor data within BIM models because of their powerful visualization capabilities. Following the steps in this layer, the processed digital twin data is then made available to end users through various visualization forms. Common visualization methods include S curve, trend and line graphs, real-time status Kanban, pie, and cumulative sum control charts [72]. Monitored parameters, such as pedestrian count and sensor readings for ambient temperature and humidity, are frequently displayed on visualization platforms.

4.3.5. Service Decision-Making Layer

The service decision-making layer in DT applications facilitates dynamic and intelligent predictive maintenance decisions driven by data. It encompasses optimization objective selection, mathematical problem modeling, and intelligent optimal decision-making calculations [31]. Choosing optimization objectives refers to selecting digital device components (such as sensors, robotics, or IoT devices) that require predictive maintenance decisions based on real-time data gathered about their condition. The main elements are typically chosen to represent the current condition of the equipment installed during the construction phase or in the assets of intelligent buildings.
For instance, in the case of industrial IoT sensors, the core sensor node’s primary function is to sense temperature data, and its sensing module may be selected for routine predictive maintenance. This layer provides a wide range of services tailored to specific contexts in construction sector applications, with real-time monitoring of assets and activities being a prevalent service offered. DTs have been utilized in various construction sector operations, including monitoring suspension bridges, building façades, façade brightness, pedestrian and time trends, on-site construction activities, progress and quality of compaction, intelligent stuff, machine and worker works, construction progress, and room occupancy [1]. The intelligent optimal decision-making calculation in this layer relies on selecting the corresponding AI algorithm to train the processed data from the previous layers, obtain prediction results, and make maintenance decisions. As this layer holds the core data management objectives for DT employment, some challenges revolve around transforming collected data and model insights into actionable decisions, enhancing project efficiency and resource allocation in the construction businesses. Deploying advanced analytics and more robust, yet aligned AI algorithms, could help to better interpret and analyze the integrated data in DTs, generating valuable insights for project managers and stakeholders. Additionally, establishing holistic strategies for integrating real-time data simultaneously from multiple layers can lead to informed decisions on various aspects of the construction processes.

4.4. Enablers

A five-dimensional digital twin model of the enabling technologies and entities is rigorously prepared by Qinglin et al. [5]. The model presents (Figure 8) the clarities and understanding of all the different parts of the objects or complex systems of DTs and enables the DT technology’s functionalities for various construction sector applications.

4.4.1. Physical Entity

In the context of the DT concept, a physical entity refers to a real-world object or system existing in the built environment, such as a building, infrastructure, equipment, or tangible component. The representation of these physical entities in a digital format creates the foundation for a DT, enabling the simulation of their behaviors. Functionally and structurally, the physical world can be categorized into three levels: unit, system, and system of the system (SoS) levels [124].
The digital twin, comprising the virtual representation of a physical entity, provides valuable insights, analysis, and predictions about its performance and behavior. For instance, BIM is a virtual representation of a building or infrastructure project in the construction sector and a precursor to a digital twin [43]. BIM models encompass architectural elements, structural components, and mechanical and electrical systems. BIM forms the basis for creating a digital twin during the construction and operational phases. Additionally, bridges or high-rise buildings can be equipped with sensors to monitor their structural health [22,23]. The data collected from these sensors are fed into the digital twin, enabling real-time monitoring and analysis of the structure’s integrity. This aids in anomaly detection, predicting maintenance needs, and enhancing overall safety and reliability. However, developing and enhancing DT involves an extensive process due to the physical world’s intricate attributes and explicit and implicit connections. Virtual models representing physical entities may require gradual improvement to accurately correspond to their real-world counterparts [84]. This necessitates a comprehensive understanding and perception of the physical world. Additionally, digitizing physical entities reveals implicit associations that contribute to the evolution and control of the physical world [65]. Therefore, achieving an accurate representation of physical entities through high-fidelity models is crucial, requiring critical attention to precise measurements of parameters and technologies at micro/nano-level precisions to synchronize virtual models with real-world entities.

4.4.2. Virtual Model

The integration of virtual entities and the digital world plays a vital role in the development and applications of DTs in the built environment. In the DT concept, a virtual entity or virtual model refers to the digital replica or representation of the physical entity or environment. It is a computer-generated model that simulates the characteristics, behavior, and interactions of the physical entity or environment in a virtual space. The virtual entity/world is a critical component of digital twins in the built environment, especially within the construction sector, as it provides a platform for simulating and visualizing the behavior and performance of the physical entity.
Virtual models within DTs aim to accurately replicate physical objects, encompassing their geometries, properties, behaviors, and rules [84]. Geometric models of physical entities describe their shape, size, tolerance, and structural relations in a three-dimensional representation [5]. Physics models simulate physical phenomena such as deformation, delamination, fracture, and corrosion based on properties like speed, wear, and force [54]. Behavior models capture the entity’s behaviors, state transitions, performance degradation, coordination, and responses to external changes [1]. Rule models use rules taken from the past or from domain experts to provide DTs with logical capabilities, including judgment, reasoning, assessment, and self-made decision making [35]. Virtual models play a crucial role in construction projects’ design and prototyping stages. Practitioners can create and manipulate digital representations of buildings, infrastructure, or components to explore different design alternatives, test structural integrity, assess aesthetic aspects, and evaluate performance attributes. This allows for iterative design improvements and reduces costly errors during the construction phase. Currently, by integrating virtual representations of various physical entities, clashes or conflicts between different systems can be detected and resolved virtually. This helps identify and rectify design inconsistencies or clashes before actual construction begins, leading to cost and time savings.

4.4.3. Data

In the DT concept, data are crucial in comprising digital twins in the built environment, particularly in the construction sector. Data refer to the information collected, generated, and processed from various sources related to the physical entity and its environment, including sensor data, operational data, maintenance records, performance metrics, and other relevant data points. The data entity establishes the foundation for prediction, analysis, and decision making in digital twins, encompassing multi-temporal scale, multi-dimensional, multi-source, and heterogeneous data [72].
Physical entities contribute static attributes and dynamic condition data, while virtual models generate simulation-based data. Data collection in DT applications within the AEC sector involves various sources, such as hardware, software, and networks [92]. Hardware-based data acquisition employs identification technologies like RFID, barcodes, QR codes, cameras, IoT, and sensor devices for the real-time collection of static attributes and dynamic status data. Software-based data collection leverages software APIs and open database interfaces, while network data are obtained through web crawlers, search engines, and public APIs. For example, sensors embedded in buildings, infrastructure, or construction equipment can collect data from energy consumption patterns, enabling energy efficiency analysis and identifying potential optimizations [78]. Moreover, by integrating data from various sources, such as sensors, maintenance records, and operational data, the digital twin can analyze data to identify performance deviations, potential issues, and optimization opportunities [6,7,33]. Data management, including collection, transmission, storage, and fusion, plays a significant role in digital twin technology, as it is the fundamental component and requires a single source of truth and high data quality.

4.4.4. Smart Service

Smart services are a crucial component of DT technology and play a significant role in digital twins across industries, specifically in the construction sector. The term refers to integrating advanced technologies, such as AI, machine learning, data analytics, and automation, to provide intelligent functionalities and capabilities within the digital twin. These smart services enhance the value and effectiveness of digital twins in various applications, aligning with the Everything-as-a-Service (XaaS) paradigm [5]. Third-party services, such as data services, knowledge services, and algorithms services, are necessary to develop a functioning DT.
The integration of multiple disciplines within the DT services enables advanced diagnosis, monitoring, simulation, and prognosis. Monitoring relies on computer graphics, 3D rendering, graphics engines, image processing, and virtual reality synchronization [33]. Simulation encompasses various domains, such as structural mechanics (e.g., thermodynamics, solid mechanics, and kinematics), electronic circuits, control systems, processes, and virtual test simulations [88,99,125]. Data analysis forms the basis for diagnosis and prognosis, involving statistical and fuzzy theories, machine learning, neural networks, and fault trees [82,92,106]. For instance, an intelligent service in the digital twin can simulate different construction scenarios and optimize task sequencing to minimize project duration and costs [126]. Smart services enable real-time monitoring and control of the physical object within the DT by integrating sensors, data analytics, and automation. This allows the DT to continuously monitor and manage the physical entity’s performance, energy consumption, and operational conditions.

4.4.5. Connection

Connections are critical enablers that play a vital role in digital twins, effectively integrating digital representations with their real-world counterparts in the built environment. These connections facilitate advanced simulations, operations, and analyses. Information and data exchange among all previous DT enablers, i.e., services, data, physical things, and virtual models, are enabled by these connections. A recent study [5] has identified six key connections in a DT: the connection between (i) physical entities and virtual models, (ii) physical entities and data, (iii) physical entities and services, (iv) virtual models and data, (v) virtual models and services, and (vi) services and data. These connections foster collaboration among the different components of the DT, helping to develop the DT concept.
For instance, connections between temperature sensors, HVAC systems, and energy management platforms can be established in developing a DT for smart building analytics. By synchronizing collected data, a comprehensive view of the physical entity can be provided, optimizing energy consumption in the building [78]. During the construction, connections between sensors embedded in construction equipment or materials can be established, providing continuous data feeds to the digital twin for analysis and decision making. Moreover, integrating different systems within the digital twin ecosystem, including BMS, BAS, and SHM, is vital for helping O&M operators prepare strategies for optimized maintenance of building facilities [120]. Thus, an interconnected view of the physical and digital entities, established through connections between various components and systems, enables stakeholders to make informed decisions and enhance performance in the built environment.

4.5. Functionalities

4.5.1. Simulation

The simulation function of DT applications in the AEC sector has revolutionized built environment practices during the current digital transformation era. It allows for virtual representation and analysis of physical assets, enabling stakeholders to evaluate and optimize various aspects of the built environment before construction begins. While high-fidelity simulations have proven successful in smaller-scale mass manufacturing industries [17,55,65], expectations and requirements differ when considering larger structures such as buildings, infrastructure, or city districts. Thus, simulation precision varies across domains and use cases, necessitating adaptable platforms for hosting DTs.
In sensor-data-based simulations within a DT, sensors’ quality, accuracy, and precision significantly impact the simulation process. The costs of implementing on-site sensing versus the required precision for each use case are influenced by sensor characteristics. For instance, practitioners can use simulations linked to the DT to predict the performance of the physical twin in real-world conditions, contrasting with relying solely on ideal or worst-case scenarios during the design process [1,25]. Incorporating data from the physical twin into the DT enhances system models, facilitating improved operation in the real world. Moreover, DTs can simulate the energy performance of buildings to analyze their energy efficiency, considering several factors and different scenarios. This helps designers identify the most energy-efficient solutions, reducing the environmental impact and operational costs [64,78]. In the case of structural analysis and safety assessment [118,127], DTs can simulate the behavior of buildings and infrastructure under various load conditions, earthquakes, or extreme weather events. This enables engineers to evaluate their structural integrity, identify potential weaknesses, and optimize designs to enhance safety.

4.5.2. Visualization

The visualization functionality of DT applications in the AEC sector has become a powerful tool in the current digitalization era, allowing stakeholders to visualize and interact with virtual representations of physical assets. It enhances communication, understanding, and decision making throughout the project lifecycle, enabling the representation of system operation and maintenance statuses in surreal forms [128]. Traditional visualization methods often rely on two-dimensional or static tools, such as tables, charts, graphs, and file printing. However, the visualization capabilities of DT technology are more advanced, primarily employing either 3D or higher-dimensional and dynamic elements, such as images, videos, and virtual and augmented reality. By leveraging virtual simulation capabilities, the DT offers faster verification of analysis results compared to traditional approaches, eliminating the need for physical execution processes or third-party simulations [5,44].
Among the various fundamental enabling technologies for visualization in DTs, 3D or higher-dimensional platforms, gaming environments, AR, and VR are most famous for their extensive usage in the built environment. Common 3D modeling software and gaming environment platforms provide intuitive interfaces for interacting with digital models and enable real-time exploration of virtual environments. VR devices allow users to interact in real time through sensorimotor channels, enhancing the visualization experience and facilitating better understanding and decision-making processes. Similarly, the AR technology of the DT overlays digital information onto a user’s view of the physical environment using an interface, typically through a camera image. By blending virtual and real-world data, AR enables contextual visualization, making it particularly useful for on-site construction applications. Profound visualization capabilities are also utilized by integrating various BIM data into a DT, through which stakeholders can visually detect clashes or conflicts between different components or systems. For instance, architects can examine the placement of ductwork and electrical systems to ensure they do not interfere with structural elements, reducing costly rework during construction.

4.5.3. Prediction

In DT technology, prediction functionality has emerged as a valuable tool during the current era of digitalization, playing a crucial role in forecasting assets’ future behavior and health status. Leveraging historical data and real-time inputs enables stakeholders to forecast and anticipate future performance, risks, and outcomes of built environment projects. Enabling technologies, particularly those associated with the IoT, facilitate prediction in DT applications by utilizing big data. Handling large amounts of data presents a significant value potential for the deployment of DTs [110]. Prediction techniques on big data often rely on ML or data mining (DM), where ML reproduces known knowledge and DM discovers new patterns and implicit knowledge within the data. ML has been proposed as a top layer for more intelligent BIM-based building management, while the need for fusion and interoperability between data analysis and DTs has been emphasized to enhance the DT’s self-reliance [110].
Predictive maintenance is a prominent application of DTs in academic research and industry practice. DTs can analyze sensor data, historical performance, and maintenance records to predict equipment failures or deterioration. By forecasting maintenance needs, facility managers can proactively schedule repairs, optimize resource allocation, and minimize downtime, improving operational efficiency and reducing costs [114,116]. Additionally, prediction plays a significant role in sustainability and energy management. DTs can analyze data on energy consumption, weather patterns, and occupant behavior to predict energy usage and identify opportunities for energy optimization. For example, an intelligent DT can forecast the energy performance of a building under different scenarios, enabling designers to make informed decisions regarding energy-efficient systems and renewable energy integration [79]. However, the reliability of the source data is a critical concern; therefore, verifying the validity of predictions and their impact on physical actuation requires careful consideration.

4.5.4. Optimization

The optimization feature of DT applications is a powerful tool that enables AEC stakeholders to analyze and improve various aspects of the built environment, leading to enhanced performance, efficiency, and sustainability. The optimization process relies on simulated predictions to guide decision making. The manufacturing industry aims to optimize the entire process by intelligently allocating resources, as seen in experimental tests optimizing assembly algorithms [17,65]. However, the operation stage incurs significant costs in the built environment practices and energy-related sectors. Balancing energy and resource consumption becomes the primary challenge.
The design and construction processes of infrastructure facilities and buildings significantly impact lifecycle operation costs. Therefore, construction optimization goals often differ from operational objectives, leading to a rift in the lifecycle [93]. This sets the built environment apart from the manufacturing industries. AI can add value to negotiation-intensive management approaches by advising on optimized duration, sequencing, and other factors. The more complex the construction site becomes regarding people, vehicles, and materials, the more challenging optimization becomes. The semantic DT enables proactive modeling, tracing and tracking, and optimization of construction operations and the associated resources, both on- and off-site [8]. In the literature on DTs, there could be two types of process models for optimal operations: those focusing on optimizing construction processes and those focusing on optimizing equipment operations. The iterative optimization type also plays a crucial role in achieving good design throughout the conceptual and detailed design phases [128]. The DT technology then enables tracking of historical product design footprints and improvements, facilitating iterative design optimization between static configurations and dynamic executions.

4.5.5. Monitoring

The monitoring feature of DT applications has become an essential tool as it allows stakeholders to continuously monitor and assess the performance and condition of physical assets in real time. This enables proactive maintenance, improved operations, and enhanced decision making in the built environment. Monitoring aligns with building automation systems, where specific conditions trigger actions or actuations [129]. Real-time remote monitoring is also prevalent, allowing sensor data to be visualized, analyzed, and compared. A sensor network is used in monitoring to choose and filter pertinent data for daily operational management. In the virtual version of the DT, these data must be sent in a machine-interpretable format and used for decision making using distant agents, such as AI systems or humans. For example, photogrammetry, laser scanning, handheld mobile devices, and aerial drones are used to capture site data and automate BIM during construction, enabling on-site scanning and data reflection within the BIM model [130].
However, challenges persist regarding data validation, interpretation, and effective real-time processing to facilitate responses [123]. Construction site safety is a critical aspect that requires practical monitoring tools, as safety risks vary in space and time. Conventional BIM platforms are commonly used for these purposes, but they often lack safety planning object libraries that link to temporary site structures, making safety management challenging in complex spatiotemporal contexts [110]. Modern site monitoring equipment, combined with ML-based DTs, has the potential to predict and classify safety events automatically, thereby enhancing safety management reliability.

5. Summary and Future Recommendations

After reviewing the available literature on the key elements and components of the DT technology development and evolution as well as its applications in the construction industry, identified research gaps and corresponding future research avenues were placed and are discussed in this section.
  • Semantic data modeling for better integration and interoperability: The integration and fusion of diverse data sets, including BIM models, sensor data, and other systems, present challenges in data integration and interoperability. Future research should focus on semantic data modeling to enable standardized digital twin data, facilitating a seamless and bi-directional integration of heterogeneous data sets. The rich data models preserving high-quality data integrity for different applications, data sets, assets, and processes should be developed rigorously.
  • Advanced technologies for big data storing and processing: Digital twins of the digitalization era have led to an increase in dynamic and real-time data, posing challenges in storing, processing, and managing big data. Future research should explore better technologies for storing and handling smart big data while addressing issues related to raw data. The new improvements in data accuracy, intelligence levels, and decision making in construction projects and assets management functions should be developed comprehensively.
  • XR environments for DT applications: XR technologies (VR, AR, and MR) offer opportunities for visualizing and interacting with digital twin data in immersive environments for specific applications in the construction industry. Future developments should focus on enhancing the visualization of temporal, multi-temporal, and spatio-temporal data in a 3D virtual model and finding innovative ways to visualize abstract parameters collected with IoT sensors.
  • Real-time monitoring, prediction, and feedback control: Further research is needed to achieve ideal digital twins that incorporate high-precision real-time monitoring and prediction capabilities within the built environment, especially in the sustainability and net-zero paradigms. Future studies should focus on enabling automated two-way feedback control for adjusting building parameters when necessary. An intelligent exploration of the integration of technologies such as AI, AR, and advanced analytics to enhance the capabilities of digital twins is also needed.
  • Cloud computing and IoT-based services for city-level digital twins: As digital twins evolve, future research might need to explore practical applications at the city level, integrating different assets such as smart buildings and utilities, people and transportation infrastructure. Future research efforts need to develop comprehensive and interconnected city digital twins by leveraging cloud computing and IoT-based services enhancement.
  • Security and privacy considerations: Data transmission in digital twins involves sensitive and confidential information, making it prone to possible cyber attacks and security threats. In future research efforts, addressing security requirements and developing secure transmission protocols for digital twins’ network and communication layers is crucial for DT applications in the construction sector. Additionally, privacy-preserving networks and privacy policies should be investigated to protect data privacy.

6. Conclusions

The advent of digital twins comprises several vital components and elements that develop and evolve this technology for its different applications in the construction industry. These components are crucial to growing the DT concept and can potentially enhance productivity in the construction industry through intelligent decision making. Therefore, this study explores the key components and elements of DT technology development based on the available state-of-the-art. A step-by-step literature search using relevant keywords yielded 110 research articles mainly focused on DT development in the AEC sector based on key emerging technologies. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the research records provided an extensive outlook on the key constituents of DT technology and its applications in the construction sector.
Five key components, namely technologies, data layers, maturity levels, enablers, and functionalities, are identified as the core elements of the DT concept. AI, IoT, XR, and cloud computing are identified as the core emerging technologies that build the DT technology to be intelligently employed to automate operations during different stages of the built asset. Data acquisition, transmission, modeling, integration, and service are critical activities when digital data are handled during the DT concept employment to convert the physical world into a meaningful virtual entity. Maturity levels of DT technology were also discussed to highlight the quality and usability of the DT at different stages of its composition. A few essential items enabling DT employment are a physical entity, data, digital model, service, and connection. The last building block of the DT, i.e., functionalities, is divided into simulation, visualization, prediction, monitoring, and prediction. The applications of DT technology are comprehensively analyzed to review the implementation of these key components and their contribution to DT evolution. After an intensive review of the available research, DT has been identified as a core of intelligent operations in the AEC industry during the current Construction 4.0 age that might automate processes and systems in real time and accelerate them to deliver appropriate feedback.
DT technology is found to have an overarching impact on the construction industry operations throughout the lifecycle of the building asset, whether it is a conventional building component or a smart building of a sustainable future. Finally, this review study has identified some research gaps compromising the DT evolution to offer fully autonomous operations across industries. For example, the lack of profound bi-directional communication between the physical entity and the virtual model compromises data integrity and the support for practical decision making. A few future research avenues corresponding to identified research gaps were also offered; for instance, a need for AI-based two-way communication between systems to have an iterative process is recommended.
Furthermore, the current utilization of AI in digital twins (DTs) has significant implications for the construction industry. One notable application is the proposal to enhance construction safety through the use of AI, as exemplified in the case of ChatGPT [131]. Construction industry professionals can leverage AI by using prompts to generate code for extracting DT data from SQL databases, reducing the dependency on highly trained programmers [132]. Recent advancements in retrieval augmented models (RAG) have enabled the extraction of knowledge from external knowledge bases. The incorporation of parametric and non-parametric memory mechanisms helps mitigate hallucinations, a challenge often associated with large language models (LLM), while enhancing interpretability [133]. This progress underscores the importance of incorporating AI prompt engineering training for reducing hallucinations in construction education. Continuing professional development for construction practitioners should also encompass the latest developments in DTs, including AI advancements such as RAG and prompt engineering, to fully leverage the benefits of DTs. Given that these developments may entail certain costs, government policy support is deemed essential, such as providing grants and affordable training venues.
All in all, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by systematically classifying the key elements that comprise the development of DT technology for its applications, specifically in the construction sector. This can assist current and upcoming research efforts as well as industry practitioners in developing a clearer understanding of the primary technologies behind the DT concept and advancements based on that understanding.
Since ChatGPT’s emergence in 2022, the field of AI has undergone another significant revolution, resulting in the development of various tools designed to transform natural languages into code. Notably, this study has not yet examined the impact of these tools on DTs, as academic publication cycles often involve substantial time lags. Additionally, this research has omitted certain earlier studies on DTs, specifically those related to early DT generations that predate the deep learning era.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A., R.Y.M.L., M.S., M.F.A. and L.C.T.; methodology, M.A. and M.S.; software, M.A., M.B., H.G. and O.M.; validation, M.A., R.Y.M.L., M.S. and L.C.T.; formal analysis, M.A. and M.S.; investigation, M.A.; resources, M.F.A., M.B. and O.M.; data curation, M.A. and H.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A., M.S. and M.F.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A., R.Y.M.L., M.F.A., L.C.T. and O.M.; visualization, M.S., M.B. and H.G.; supervision, R.Y.M.L. and L.C.T.; project administration, R.Y.M.L. and L.C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Habiba Ghafoor was a Design Engineer by the Descon Engineering Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Attaran, M.; Celik, B.G. Digital twin: Benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities. Decis. Anal. J. 2023, 6, 100165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agrawal, A.; Thiel, R.; Jain, P.; Singh, V.; Fischer, M. Digital twin: Where do humans fit in? Autom. Constr. 2023, 148, 104749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Botín-Sanabria, D.M.; Mihaita, A.-S.; Peimbert-García, R.E.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.d.J. Digital twin technology challenges and applications: A comprehensive review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Martínez-Olvera, C. Towards the development of a digital twin for a sustainable mass customization 4.0 environment: A literature review of relevant concepts. Automation 2022, 3, 197–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Hu, T.; Anwer, N.; Liu, A.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y.C. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Afzal, M. Evaluation and Development of Automated Detailing Design Optimization Framework for RC Slabs Using BIM and Metaheuristics; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology: Hong Kong, China, 2019; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, Y.; Afzal, M.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Gan, J. Concrete reinforcement modelling with IFC for automated rebar fabrication. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management (ICCEPM 2020), Hong Kong, China, 7–8 December 2020; Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1783.1/110084 (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  8. Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.; Lee, G.; Teicholz, P. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhuang, D.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, C.; Jin, X.; Zhou, X.; Shi, X. A performance data integrated BIM framework for building life-cycle energy efficiency and environmental optimization design. Autom. Constr. 2021, 127, 103712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, K.; Peavy, M. BIM-based semantic building world modeling for robot task planning and execution in built environments. Autom. Constr. 2022, 138, 104247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Doumbouya, L.; Gao, G.; Guan, C. Adoption of the building information modeling (bim) for construction project effectiveness: The review of bim benefits. Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 2016, 4, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  12. Durdyev, S.; Ashour, M.; Connelly, S.; Mahdiyar, A. Barriers to the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for facility management. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 46, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leygonie, R.; Motamedi, A.; Iordanova, I. Development of quality improvement procedures and tools for facility management BIM. Dev. Built Environ. 2022, 11, 100075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Batty, M. Digital twins. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2018, 45, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bradley, A.; Li, H.; Lark, R.; Dunn, S. BIM for infrastructure: An overall review and constructor perspective. Autom. Constr. 2016, 71, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khudhair, A.; Li, H.; Ren, G.; Liu, S. Towards Future BIM Technology Innovations: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sacks, R.; Brilakis, I.; Pikas, E.; Xie, H.S.; Girolami, M. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Eng. 2020, 1, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Saeed, Y.; Edwards, D.J.; Scaysbrook, S. Automating construction manufacturing procedures using BIM digital objects (BDOs). Constr. Innov. 2020, 20, 345–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaewunruen, S.; Peng, S.; Phil-Ebosie, O. Digital twin aided sustainability and vulnerability audit for subway stations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coupry, C.; Noblecourt, S.; Richard, P.; Baudry, D.; Bigaud, D. BIM-based digital twin and xr devices to improve maintenance procedures in smart buildings: A literature review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Honghong, S.; Gang, Y.; Haijiang, L.; Tian, Z.; Annan, J. Digital twin enhanced BIM to shape full life cycle digital transformation for bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. 2023, 147, 104736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, R.; Brilakis, I. Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Autom. Constr. 2019, 105, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, H.; Liu, Z. Research on intelligent dispatching system management platform for construction projects based on digital twin and bim technology. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8273451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Attaran, M.; Attaran, S.; Celik, B.G. The impact of digital twins on the evolution of intelligent manufacturing and Industry 4.0. Adv. Comput. Intell. 2023, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Julien, N.; Martin, E. How to characterize a Digital Twin: A Usage-Driven Classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bryant, R. The digital future of the construction industry. Constr. Eng. Aust. 2021, 7, 46–47. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, W.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Xie, L.; Lv, Z. BIM information integration based vr modeling in digital twins in industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 28, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Davtalab, O. Benefits of Real-Time Data Driven BIM for FM Departments in Operations Control and Maintenance; ASCE: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; Volume 2017, pp. 202–210. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao, J.; Feng, H.; Chen, Q.; Garcia de Soto, B. Developing a conceptual framework for the application of digital twin technologies to revamp building operation and maintenance processes. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 49, 104028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tan, Y.; Chen, P.; Shou, W.; Sadick, A.-M. Digital Twin-driven approach to improving energy efficiency of indoor lighting based on computer vision and dynamic BIM. Energy Build. 2022, 270, 112271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grégorio, J.-L.; Lartigue, C.; Thiébaut, F.; Lebrun, R. A digital twin-based approach for the management of geometrical deviations during assembly processes. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alizadehsalehi, S.; Yitmen, I. Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX). Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2023, 12, 200–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Davila Delgado, J.M.; Oyedele, L. Digital Twins for the built environment: Learning from conceptual and process models in manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 49, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, M.; Fang, S.; Dong, H.; Xu, C. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kaewunruen, S.; Lian, Q. Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al-Ali, A.R.; Gupta, R.; Zaman Batool, T.; Landolsi, T.; Aloul, F.; Al Nabulsi, A. Digital twin conceptual model within the context of internet of things. Future Internet 2020, 12, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Omrany, H.; Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Husain, A.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A. Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, R.Y.M.; Chau, K.W.; Ho, D.C.-W. Current State of Art in Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  40. Daniotti, B.; Masera, G.; Bolognesi, C.M.; Lupica Spagnolo, S.; Pavan, A.; Iannaccone, G.; Signorini, M.; Ciuffreda, S.; Mirarchi, C.; Lucky, M.; et al. The development of a bim-based interoperable toolkit for efficient renovation in buildings: From bim to digital twin. Buildings 2022, 12, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kamari, M.; Ham, Y. AI-based risk assessment for construction site disaster preparedness through deep learning-based digital twinning. Autom. Constr. 2022, 134, 104091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ozturk, G.B. Digital Twin Research in the AECO-FM Industry. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deng, M.; Menassa, C.C.; Kamat, V.R. From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 58–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tuhaise, V.V.; Tah, J.H.M.; Abanda, F.H. Technologies for digital twin applications in construction. Autom. Constr. 2023, 152, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, N.; Li, R.Y.M.; Yao, Q.; Song, L.; Deeprasert, J. Housing safety and health academic and public opinion mining from 1945 to 2021: PRISMA, cluster analysis, and natural language processing approaches. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 902576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Afzal, M.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Gan, V.J.L. Reinforced concrete structural design optimization: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 120623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kugley, S.; Wade, A.; Thomas, J.; Mahood, Q.; Anne-Marie Klint, J.; Hammerstrøm, K.; Sathe, N. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2017, 13, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. David, A.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Li, R.Y.; Corchado, J.M.; Cheong, P.H.; Mossberger, K.; Mehmood, R. Understanding Local Government Digital Technology Adoption Strategies: A PRISMA Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mou, X.; Li, R.Y.M. The Impact of ArtificialIntelligence Educational Robots in the Field of Education: A Prismareview. In Current State of Art in Artificial Intelligence and Ubiquitous Cities; Li, R.Y.M., Chau, K.W., Ho, D.C.W., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gusenbauer, M.; Haddaway, N.R. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 11, 181–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shu, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, D. Cloud-integrated cyber-physical systems for complex industrial applications. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2016, 21, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baucas, M.J.; Spachos, P.; Gregori, S. Internet-of-things devices and assistive technologies for health care: APPLICATIONS, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2021, 38, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Geng, R.; Li, M.; Hu, Z.; Han, Z.; Zheng, R. Digital twin in smart manufacturing: Remote control and virtual machining using VR and AR technologies. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2022, 65, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hou, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, G.; Tan, Y.; Wang, X. Literature review of digital twins applications in construction workforce safety. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lv, Z.; Xie, S. Artificial intelligence in the digital twins: State of the art, challenges, and future research topics [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Digit. Twin 2022, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mandolla, C.; Petruzzelli, A.M.; Percoco, G.; Urbinati, A. Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput. Ind. 2019, 109, 134–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shahzad, M.; Shafiq, M.T.; Douglas, D.; Kassem, M. Digital twins in built environments: An investigation of the characteristics, applications, and challenges. Buildings 2022, 12, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shirowzhan, S.; Tan, W.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E. Digital twin and cybergis for improving connectivity and measuring the impact of infrastructure construction planning in smart cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. White, G.; Zink, A.; Codecá, L.; Clarke, S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 2021, 110, 103064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, Y.; Shang, J.; Xue, F. RegARD: Symmetry-based coarse registration of smartphone’s colorful point clouds with cad drawings for low-cost digital twin buildings. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Digital-twin-based evaluation of nearly zero-energy building for existing buildings based on scan-to-bim. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6638897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bao, J.; Guo, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. The modelling and operations for the digital twin in the context of manufacturing. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2019, 13, 534–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Madni, A.M.; Madni, C.C.; Lucero, S.D. Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems 2019, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Osadcha, I.; Jurelionis, A.; Fokaides, P. Geometric parameter updating in digital twin of built assets: A systematic literature review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 73, 106704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharif Ullah, A.M.M. Modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing phenomena using sensor signals from the perspective of Industry 4.0. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tao, F.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, Q.; Qu, T.; Hu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, F.; Xu, W.; et al. Digital twin and its potential application exploration. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. CIMS 2018, 24, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. De Wilde, P. Building performance simulation in the brave new world of artificial intelligence and digital twins: A systematic review. Energy Build. 2023, 292, 113171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hannele, K.; Reijo, M.; Tarja, M.; Sami, P.; Jenni, K.; Teija, R. Expanding uses of building information modeling in life-cycle construction projects. Work 2012, 41, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Guo, D.; Wu, W.; Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q. Digital twin-enabled smart modular integrated construction system for on-site assembly. Comput. Ind. 2022, 136, 103594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zhong, R.Y.; Pan, W.; Huang, G.Q. Digital twin-enabled real-time synchronization for planning, scheduling, and execution in precast on-site assembly. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, C.; Park, T.; Lim, H.; Kim, H. On-site construction management using mobile computing technology. Autom. Constr. 2013, 35, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pan, Y.; Zhang, L. A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Autom. Constr. 2021, 124, 103564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Peng, C. Calculation of a building’s life cycle carbon emissions based on Ecotect and building information modeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shahinmoghadam, M.; Natephra, W.; Motamedi, A. BIM- and IoT-based virtual reality tool for real-time thermal comfort assessment in building enclosures. Build. Environ. 2021, 199, 107905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Spudys, P.; Afxentiou, N.; Georgali, P.-Z.; Klumbyte, E.; Jurelionis, A.; Fokaides, P. Classifying the operational energy performance of buildings with the use of digital twins. Energy Build. 2023, 290, 113106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tagliabue, L.C.; Re Cecconi, F.; Rinaldi, S.; Ciribini, A.L.C. Data driven indoor air quality prediction in educational facilities based on IoT network. Energy Build. 2021, 236, 110782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Guo, J.; Zhao, N.; Sun, L.; Zhang, S. Modular based flexible digital twin for factory design. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Legner, C.; Eymann, T.; Hess, T.; Matt, C.; Böhmann, T.; Drews, P.; Mädche, A.; Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Schroeder, G.N.; Steinmetz, C.; Pereira, C.E.; Espindola, D.B. Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tao, F.; Sui, F.; Liu, A.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, B.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.C.Y.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3935–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tao, F.; Zhang, M. Digital twin shop-floor: A new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 20418–20427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Glaessgen, E.; Stargel, D. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2012; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jiang, F.; Ma, L.; Broyd, T.; Chen, K. Digital twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Autom. Constr. 2021, 130, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Scharl, S.; Praktiknjo, A. The role of a digital industry 4.0 in a renewable energy system. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 3891–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shafto, M.; Conroy, M.; Doyle, R.; Glaessgen, E.; Kemp, C.; LeMoigne, J.; Wang, L. Modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Natl. Aeronaut. Space Adm. 2012, 32, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tao, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, M.; Hu, T.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F.; Wang, T.; Xu, H.; Huang, Z.; et al. Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications. Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. CIMS 2019, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Grieves, M.W. Product lifecycle management: The new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2005, 2, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Grieves, M. Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication. White Pap. 2015, 1, 1–7. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047_Digital_Twin_Manufacturing_Excellence_through_Virtual_Factory_Replication (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  92. Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Stark, R.; Kind, S.; Neumeyer, S. Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rosen, R.; von Wichert, G.; Lo, G.; Bettenhausen, K.D. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhuang, C.; Liu, J.; Xiong, H. Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 1149–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. NASA. DRAFT Modeling, Simulation, Information Technology & Processing Roadmap—Technology Area 11; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  97. Hochhalter, J.D.; Leser, W.P.; Newman, J.A.; Glaessgen, E.H.; Gupta, V.K.; Yamakov, V.I. Coupling Damage-Sensing Particles to the Digitial Twin Concept. 2014. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140006408/downloads/20140006408.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  98. Boschert, S.; Rosen, R. Digital twin—The simulation aspect. In Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers; Hehenberger, P., Bradley, D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar]
  99. Schluse, M.; Rossmann, J. From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Orlando, FL, USA, 18–21 April 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Weyer, S.; Meyer, T.; Ohmer, M.; Gorecky, D.; Zühlke, D. Future modeling and simulation of cps-based factories: An example from the automotive industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. A Review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches; Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
  103. Demkovich, N.; Yablochnikov, E.; Abaev, G. Multiscale modeling and simulation for industrial cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 15–18 May 2018; pp. 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, Q.; Liu, B.; Wang, G.; Zhang, C. A comparative study on digital twin models. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: College Park, MD, USA, 2019; Volume 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Autiosalo, J.; Vepsäläinen, J.; Viitala, R.; Tammi, K. A feature-based framework for structuring industrial digital twins. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 1193–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kong, T.; Hu, T.; Zhou, T.; Ye, Y. Data Construction method for the applications of workshop digital twin system. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Al-Sehrawy, R.; Kumar, B. Digital twins in architecture, engineering, construction and operations. A brief review and analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, São Paulo, Brazil, 18–20 August 2020; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 924–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. ECSO. Digitalisation in the Construction Sector: Analytical Report; European Construction Sector Observatory: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; Available online: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-11/ECSO_CFS%20Poland_2021.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  109. Afzal, M.; Sousa, H.S.; Valente, I.; Roux, S. BIM 7D–Research on Applications for Operations & Maintenance. Master’s Thesis, University of Minho (UMinho), Braga, Portugal, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  110. Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kamat, V. Real-Time Process-Level Digital Twin for Collaborative Human-Robot Construction Work. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC): Edinburg, UK, 2020; pp. 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yitmen, I.; Alizadehsalehi, S.; Akıner, İ.; Akıner, M.E. An Adapted Model of Cognitive Digital Twins for Building Lifecycle Management. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lu, Q.; Parlikad Ajith, K.; Woodall, P.; Don Ranasinghe, G.; Xie, X.; Liang, Z.; Konstantinou, E.; Heaton, J.; Schooling, J. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: Case study of west cambridge campus. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 05020004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Cheng, J.C.P.; Chen, W.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pregnolato, M.; Gunner, S.; Voyagaki, E.; De Risi, R.; Carhart, N.; Gavriel, G.; Tully, P.; Tryfonas, T.; Macdonald, J.; Taylor, C. Towards Civil Engineering 4.0: Concept, workflow and application of Digital Twins for existing infrastructure. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hosamo, H.H.; Svennevig, P.R.; Svidt, K.; Han, D.; Nielsen, H.K. A Digital twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy Build. 2022, 261, 111988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lee, D.; Lee, S.H.; Masoud, N.; Krishnan, M.S.; Li, V.C. Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2021, 127, 103688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, Z.; Shi, G.; Jiao, Z.; Zhao, L. Intelligent safety assessment of prestressed steel structures based on digital twins. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lee, D.; Lee, S. Digital twin for supply chain coordination in modular construction. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xie, X.; Lu, Q.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Digital twin enabled asset anomaly detection for building facility management. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020, 53, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lu, Q.; Xie, X.; Parlikad, A.K.; Schooling, J.M. Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Autom. Constr. 2020, 118, 103277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Peng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yu, F.; Xu, J.; Gao, S. Digital twin hospital buildings: An exemplary case study through continuous lifecycle integration. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8846667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Jiang, W.; Ding, L.; Zhou, C. Cyber physical system for safety management in smart construction site. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2021, 28, 788–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Wang, L.; Nee, A.Y.C. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: Correlation and comparison. Engineering 2019, 5, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kamat, V. Bi-Directional communication bridge for state synchronization between digital twin simulations and physical construction robots. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC): Edinburg, UK, 2020; pp. 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Teisserenc, B.; Sepasgozar, S. Project data categorization, adoption factors, and non-functional requirements for blockchain based digital twins in the construction industry 4.0. Buildings 2021, 11, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Liu, Z.-S.; Meng, X.-T.; Xing, Z.-Z.; Cao, C.-F.; Jiao, Y.-Y.; Li, A.-X. Digital twin-based intelligent safety risks prediction of prefabricated construction hoisting. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhong, D.; Xia, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, J. Overview of predictive maintenance based on digital twin technology. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ding, K.; Shi, H.; Hui, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, F.; Cao, W. Smart steel bridge construction enabled by BIM and Internet of Things in industry 4.0: A framework. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Zhuhai, China, 27–29 March 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yuan, X.; Anumba, C.J. Cyber-physical systems for temporary structures monitoring. In Cyber-Physical Systems in the Built Environment; Anumba, C.J., Roofigari-Esfahan, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 107–138. [Google Scholar]
  131. Uddin, S.M.; Albert, A.; Ovid, A.; Alsharef, A. Leveraging chatgpt to aid construction hazard recognition and support safety education and training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tuteja, N.; Nath, S. Reinventing the Data Experience: Use Generative AI and Modern Data Architecture to Unlock Insights. Online: AWS Machine Learning Blog. 27 October 2023. Available online: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/reinventing-the-data-experience-use-generative-ai-and-modern-data-architecture-to-unlock-insights/ (accessed on 4 October 2023).
  133. Siriwardhana, S.; Weerasekera, R.; Wen, E.; Kaluarachchi, T.; Rana, R.; Nanayakkara, S. Improving the domain adaptation of retrieval augmented generation (rag) models for open domain question answering. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2023, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A step-by-step PRISMA approach for retrieving, filtering, and finalizing research articles based on the research objectives. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 1. A step-by-step PRISMA approach for retrieving, filtering, and finalizing research articles based on the research objectives. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of the digital twin concept over recent years as evaluated from the existing studies [85,89,90,91]. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 2. Evolution of the digital twin concept over recent years as evaluated from the existing studies [85,89,90,91]. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g002
Figure 3. Summary of the number of total papers retrieved about the research on digital twins using the defined literature search strategies. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 3. Summary of the number of total papers retrieved about the research on digital twins using the defined literature search strategies. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g003
Figure 4. The number of total research papers appearing in major journals using the defined literature search strategies. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 4. The number of total research papers appearing in major journals using the defined literature search strategies. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of retrieved research papers among different research disciplines. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 5. Distribution of retrieved research papers among different research disciplines. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g005
Figure 6. Identified key components of the DT technology development and evolution for applications in the AEC sector (Figure source: authors).
Figure 6. Identified key components of the DT technology development and evolution for applications in the AEC sector (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g006
Figure 7. Core technologies encompassing digital twin applications in the construction industry (Figure source: authors).
Figure 7. Core technologies encompassing digital twin applications in the construction industry (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g007
Figure 8. Five-dimensional model of digital twin technology that enables their functionalities. (Figure source: authors).
Figure 8. Five-dimensional model of digital twin technology that enables their functionalities. (Figure source: authors).
Sustainability 15 16436 g008
Table 1. Conditions and parameters involved during the literature search for review.
Table 1. Conditions and parameters involved during the literature search for review.
Source DatabasesWeb of Science (WoS), Scopus, Taylor and Francis, IEEE Xplore, Springer, and ASCE Library
Search String(“digital twin” OR “digital twins” OR “virtual twin” OR “digital replica” OR “virtual counterpart” OR “cyber-physical system”) AND (“development” OR “evolution” OR “key technologies” OR “key components” OR “key elements” OR “applications”) AND (“construction engineering” OR “construction” OR “construction sector” OR “AEC industry” OR “construction industry” OR “construction engineering and management”)
Time Period Restriction2010–2023
Article TypesJournal, Review, Conference Paper, Book Chapter
Language RestrictionEnglish
Included Subject AreasEngineering, Computer Science, Mathematics, Energy, Environmental Science, Decision Sciences Materials Science, Business, Management, and Accounting
Excluded Subject AreasSocial Sciences, Chemical Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Arts and Humanities, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology
Work Area/IndustryConstruction Industry, AEC Sector, Civil Engineering
Table 2. Summary of some research articles corresponding to each identified vital component of the DT development.
Table 2. Summary of some research articles corresponding to each identified vital component of the DT development.
NoKey ComponentsDescriptionCorresponding Literature
ITechnologiesThe core technologies that help develop the interaction of the DT with real-world physical entities are the Internet of Things (IoTs), artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing (CC), extended reality (XR)[1,21,25,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]
IIMaturity LevelsThe basic levels of DT maturity have specific purposes and scope to help in decision making throughout the system’s lifecycle: the pre-DT, DT, adaptive and intelligent DT[2,22,26,34,35,64,65,66,67,68,69]
IIIData LayersData are the core of DT virtual model integration and fusion, and data flow in layers between systems: data acquisition, transmission, modeling, data/model integration and fusion, and service layers[36,63,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]
IVEnablersFive fundamental entities are responsible for promoting and enabling the functioning of the DT: physical entity, virtual model, data, intelligent service, connection[5,22,52,65,80,81,82,83,84]
VFunctionalitiesA variety of functionalities are carried out with DT employment; however, the crucial ones for the AEC sector applications over a product’s lifecycle are simulation, visualization, prediction, optimization, monitoring[5,17,20,23,33,36,42,72,73,75,78,83,85,86]
Table 3. Definitions of the digital twin concept from the literature to help clarify it from various perspectives and applications.
Table 3. Definitions of the digital twin concept from the literature to help clarify it from various perspectives and applications.
Corresponding StudyYearKey Point in the StudyDT-Definitions
[96]2010Integrated simulationThe DT is a comprehensive simulation of a vehicle or system, integrating multi-physics multi-scale aspects and leveraging the best physical models, sensor updates, and past operational data to mirror its real-world counterpart’s life.
[85]2012Ultra-high-fidelity modelThe DT simulates the as-built system that seamlessly mirrors its real-life counterpart by incorporating models, sensors, and other intelligent devices.
[97]2014High-fidelity modelingThe DT is a life management and certification system that integrates as-built vehicle states, as-experienced loads and environments, and another vehicle-specific history into models and simulations. This approach enables high-fidelity modeling of aerospace vehicles lifecycles.
[91]2015Lightweight virtual modelThe DT comprises a physical entity existing in the real environment, a virtual representation existing in the digital domain, and information connectors bridging the real and virtual counterparts.
[94]2015Realistic modelThe DT typically refers to highly realistic models of the current process state and their behaviors as they interact with the real-world environment.
[98]2016Functional description of a productThe DT is a virtual representation of elements, products, or systems that benefits the entire lifecycle of the entity.
[99]2016Virtual substitutesDTs are virtual substitutes for real-world objects, which embody virtual representations and communication capabilities. These smart objects function as intelligent nodes within the Internet of Things and services.
[100]2016Advancement in modeling, simulation, and optimizationThe DT represents one of the imminent major advancements in simulation, optimization, and modelling technology.
[101]2017Multi-disciplinary replicaThe DT serves as a virtual representation of a production system, capable of synchronization with the actual system through real-time data sensed from connected smart devices.
[102]2017Virtual equivalentThe DT is a virtual information that describe a physical product.
[93]2017Digital representation of an assetThe DT is the digital representation of a distinct asset (such as a product, machine, service, or intangible asset) encompassing its properties, conditions, and behaviors using models, information, and data.
[17]2018Virtual product dataThe components of a complete DT include a physical entity, a virtual counterpart, a connection linking the physical and virtual counterparts, as well as data and services.
[65]2018Product mirror and digital counterpartThe DT is a digital counterpart of a physical object.
[103]2018Multi-level digital layoutThe DT of a physical entity encompasses layers of data, including information about the product itself, the processes involved, and the resources within its operational environment.
[66]2019Updated virtual instanceThe DT is a virtual representation of a physical system (twin) that continuously updates its performance, maintenance, and health status data during its entire life cycle.
[104]2019Data mappingThe DT refers to a virtual object or a collection of virtual entities defined within the digital virtual space, establishing a mapping relationship with real-world objects in the physical space.
[105]2020Virtual entityA cyber-physical system comprises of both a physical and a cyber entity in the form of a DT.
[106]2021Twin of physical entityThe DT is an innovative concept that strives to create a virtual equivalent of the digital world’s physical entity.
[107]2021Mirror worldThe DT is an approach that establishes a bi-directional connection between a physical system and its virtual representation, enabling the utilization of artificial intelligence and big data analytics.
[108]2021Real-time digital representationThe DT is a real-time virtual representation of a physical building or infrastructure. Typically, on-site sensors continuously monitor changes within the building and its environment, providing data to update the BIM model with the latest measurements and information.
Table 4. Data layers encompass the development and evolution of DTs in the construction sector by handling vast amounts of data from different sources.
Table 4. Data layers encompass the development and evolution of DTs in the construction sector by handling vast amounts of data from different sources.
Corresponding StudyData Acquisition LayerData Transmission LayerDigital Modeling LayerData/Model Integration and Fusion LayerService Decision-Making Layer
[114]Environmental sensor data with direct digital control systemsDirect digital control system and BACnet protocol for data communicationAutodesk Revit for 3D modelingMSSQL, COBie, IFC 4 extension, Autodesk Revit plug-in, ML algorithmsMonitoring and prediction of conditions of the chiller plant
[115]Temperature and mechanical sensors dataMessage Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) and wireless sensor network (WSN)3D FEM (finite element model)Metadata APIs for calculations of measured valuesReal-time monitoring and warning alerts on reaching defined thresholds
[31]Cameras and video stream dataLAN (local area network) and InternetBIM model. Autodesk Revit, Three.js, and Draco 3DMySQL, cloud service, Three.js program, ML, and trend graphsDetection and monitoring of pedestrian trends and pedestrian time
[73]RFID tags, positioning dataSmart mobile gateway and MQTTUnity 3D modelUnity 3D, Time numerical models, and analytic chartsReal-time monitoring of activities and task alerts and ticket visualization
[116]Environmental sensors data with restful API and wired sensorsURL via API, Internet, and BACnetBIM models by Autodesk RevitMachine learning, MSSQL, IFC, COBieFault detection and prediction in air handling unit (AHU)
[72]RFID tags, industrial wearables, positioning dataLight middleware, wireless network and Mobile Gateway Operating System (MGOS)3D models with Solidworks and Autodesk 3D MaxWeb database and API for Unity 3DReal-time positioning tracing for smart objects, robots, and instantiation for prefabricated modules
[77]Environmental and thermal data with wind sensors and IoT nodesHTTP (hypertext transfer protocol)BIM models with Autodesk RevitGoogle cloud platform, game engines, thermal comfort chartsDisplay environmental, thermography, and thermal comfort levels in real time
[117]RFID and GPS tags, positioning dataInternet, web server, blockchain network, Azure blockchain platformUnity 3DMicrosoft Azure cloud, API for Unity, compliance checking for BIM and blockchainReal-time information tracing with blockchain network
[118]Environmental and mechanical data with wind, speed, and temperature sensorsAutodesk Revit, Laser scanning, and 3D point cloudML algorithm, line graphs, Markov chainSimulation of condition predictions, structural health monitoring, and early warning for maintenance
[119]Location and tracking data from the virtual server generating hypothetical IoT sensor dataVirtual modelling, Unity 3DUnity engine, data analytics, 3D simulations, API into Bing MapsMonitoring and simulation of different scenarios in real time
[113]Environmental data and component information with QR codes and BMS sensor networksHTTP (hypertext transfer protocol), Ethernet gateways3D models with Autodesk Revit and AECOsim building designer, laser scanning, photogrammetryAmazon web services (AWS), DynamoDB, IFC, API for Autodesk Forge, and time-series graphsReal-time anomaly detection in pumps, environmental monitoring, and maintenance prediction of faults of boilers
[120,121]Mechanical data with vibration sensorsBIM models by Autodesk RevitAutodesk forge API, .NET via JavaScript and C#, IFC, cumulative sum control charts (CUSUM)Anomaly detection and monitoring of the working condition of pumps
[122]Environmental, energy, and video data with BAS sensors networksHTTP and building systems communication networksLaser scanning and mixed reality (MR)MySQL, private cloud storage, deep learning, trend charts, and real-time animationsSecurity and monitoring of energy consumption and visualizations for space management
[123]Positioning and location label data with positioning devices, ultrasonic sensors, and 3D gyroscope sensorsHTTP, Bluetooth, and Wi-FiAlgorithm engines for face recognition, personnel positioning and mechanical attitude positioningMonitoring of operations, worker and component tracking alerts for risks in real time
[111]Image data with Microsoft Kinect camerasGazebo_ros_pkg for simulationVR (virtual reality), Unity 3D, Unified Robotics Description Format (UDRF)Robot Operating Software (ROS), VR headsetReal-time data capturing to control the robot on site
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Afzal, M.; Li, R.Y.M.; Shoaib, M.; Ayyub, M.F.; Tagliabue, L.C.; Bilal, M.; Ghafoor, H.; Manta, O. Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436

AMA Style

Afzal M, Li RYM, Shoaib M, Ayyub MF, Tagliabue LC, Bilal M, Ghafoor H, Manta O. Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability. 2023; 15(23):16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Afzal, Muhammad, Rita Yi Man Li, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Faisal Ayyub, Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue, Muhammad Bilal, Habiba Ghafoor, and Otilia Manta. 2023. "Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach" Sustainability 15, no. 23: 16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436

APA Style

Afzal, M., Li, R. Y. M., Shoaib, M., Ayyub, M. F., Tagliabue, L. C., Bilal, M., Ghafoor, H., & Manta, O. (2023). Delving into the Digital Twin Developments and Applications in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Approach. Sustainability, 15(23), 16436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316436

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop