Analysing Factors Influencing Land Use Planning for Sustainable Land Resource Management in Vietnam: A Case Study of Dan Phuong District in Hanoi City
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Secondary Data Collection
2.2.2. Questionnaire Survey
2.2.3. Exploratory Factor Analysis—EFA
3. Results
3.1. The Implementation of Land Use Planning in Dan Phuong District for the Period 2011–2020
- Agricultural land: the planned target was to reduce agricultural land to 2561.05 ha. In fact, at the end of the planning period (30 December 2020), 3652.67 ha remained. This means that there were still 1091.62 ha of agricultural land that had not been converted to non-agricultural land according to the proposed plan.
- Non-agricultural land: the planned target was increased to 4944.64 ha. In fact, at the end of the planning period, the area of non-agricultural land was only 3424.09 ha, which was 1520.55 ha less than the plan to serve the purpose of economic and social development.
- Unused land: the planned target was to reduce this area to 229.79 ha, but by the end of 2020, this area was still 706.05 ha, which meant that 476.26 ha were not used according to the proposed plan.
3.2. Results of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Multivariate Linear Regression Model
3.2.1. Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Test Results
3.2.2. Exploratory Factor Analysis Results
3.3. Factors Affecting Land Use Planning in Dan Phuong District
4. Discussion
4.1. Reasons for Not Completing Land Use Planning Targets for the 2011–2020 Period in the Dan Phuong District
4.2. Factors Affecting Land Use Planning in Dan Phuong District
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Guideline for Land Use Planning; FAO Development Series 1; FAO Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1993; ISBN 92-5-103282-3. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H.; Zhong, X.; Deng, S.; Xu, H. Assessment of the impact of LUCC on NPP and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River basin, China. Catena 2021, 206, 105542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rithmire, M.E. Land Institutions and Chinese Political Economy: Institutional Complementarities and Macroeconomic Management. Politics Soc. 2017, 45, 123–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vink, A.P. A Land resources. In Land Use in Advancing Agriculture; Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1975; Volume 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Z.; Zhou, W.; Razzaq, A.; Yang, Y. Land resource management and sustainable development: Evidence from China’s regional data. Resour. Policy 2023, 84, 103732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, V.N. The vital role of land use planning on Socio-economic development in Maichau district, Hoa Binh province. In Upland Natural Resource and Social-Ecological Systems in Northern Vietnam; Mai, V.T., Tran, D.V., Stephen, J.L., Ganesh, P.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 11–87. [Google Scholar]
- Kalfas, D.; Kalogiannidis, S.; Chatzitheodoridis, F.; Toska, E. Urbanization and Land Use Planning for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Case Study of Greece. Urban Sci. 2023, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thrall, G.I. 3 Pure planning scenarios and the consumption theory of land rent. Polit. Geogr. Quart. 1983, 2, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, T.S. An Economic Turn: A Hermeneutical reinterpretation of political economy concerning the question of land. Res. Phenomenol. 2011, 41, 297–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H. Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: A literature review. J. Plan. Lit. 2011, 26, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
- Capozza, D.R.; Helsley, R.W. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth. J. Urban Econ. 1989, 26, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.X.; Huang, Y.; Gao, J. Impact of industrial agglomeration on new-type urbanization: Evidence from Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration of China. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2021, 77, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debela, D.D.; Stellmacher, T.; Azadi, H.; Kelboro, G.; Lebailly, P.; Ghorbani, M. The Impact of Industrial Investments on Land Use and Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihoods in Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 105091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhu, L.; Li, R.; Wu, C.; Chen, D. Comparative Analysis of the Factors Influencing Land Use Change for Emerging Industry and Traditional Industry: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China. Land 2021, 10, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Form, W.H. The place of social structure in the determination of land use. Soc. Forces. 1954, 32, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacione, M. The internal structure of cities in the Third World. Geography 2001, 86, 189–209. [Google Scholar]
- Dale, V.H. The relationship between land-use change and climate change. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7, 753–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thapa, P. The Relationship between Land Use and Climate Change: A Case Study of Nepal. In The Nature, Causes, Effects and Mitigation of Climate Change on the Environment; Harris, S.A., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Barati, A.A.; Zhoolideh, M.; Azadi, H.; Lee, J.; Scheffran, J. Interactions of land-use cover and climate change at a global level: How to mitigate the environmental risks and warming effects. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 146, 109829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Stow, D. Strategies for integrating information from multiple spatial resolutions into land-use/land-cover classification routines. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2003, 69, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitri, G.; Nasrallah, G.; Gebrael, K.; Nassar, M.B.; Abou, M.; Dagher Nader, M.; Masri, N.; Choueiter, D. Assessing land degradation and identifying potential sustainable land management practices at the subnational level in Lebanon. Environ. Monit. Assess 2019, 191, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, P.P.; Yen, T.T. Determinants of the lives of households after land loss for urbanization: Experiences from Vinh city, Nghe An province. Land Use Policy 2022, 119, 106216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berchoux, T.; Hutton, C.W.; Hensengerth, O.; Voepel, H.E.; Tri, V.P.; Vu, P.T.; Darby, S.E. Darby Effect of planning policies on land use dynamics and livelihood opportunities under global environmental change: Evidence from the Mekong Delta. Land Use Policy 2023, 131, 106752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knowler, D.; Bradshaw, B. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 2007, 32, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgart-Getz, A.; Prokopy, L.S.; Floress, K. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A metaanalysis of the adoption literature. J. Environ. Manage 2012, 96, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Vliet, J.; Magliocca, N.R.; Büchner, B.; Cook, E.; Rey Benayas, J.M.; Ellis, E.C.; Verburg, P.H. Meta-studies in land use science: Current coverage and prospects. Ambio 2016, 45, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giang, N.; Chinh, T.; Vien, T.; Thang, N.; An, N. Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Determine the Influencing Factors of Recycling Pig Wastewater for Crop Cultivation in Hanoi City. Vietnam J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 6, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Jin, G.; Hu, Y.; He, N.; Niu, J. Performance Management of Natural Resources: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework for China. Water 2022, 14, 3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Jia, P.; Liu, K.; Yang, L.; Yan, H. Study on the Affecting Factors of Land Circulation in Minority Areas of Ledong County, Hainan Province, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, P.P.; Phuong, T.T. Factors affecting commercial housing prices in Vietnam. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2022, 15, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO). Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2022; Statistical Publisher: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Vu, H.T.D.; Tran, D.D.; Schenk, A.; Nguyen, C.P.; Vu, H.L.; Oberle, P.; Nestmann, F. Land use change in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: New evidence from remote sensing. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 813, 151918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bui, D.H.; Mucsi, L. Land-use change and urban expansion in Binh Duong province, Vietnam, from 1995 to 2020. Geocarto Int. 2022, 37, 17096–17118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vietnamese Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE). Vietnam National Environmental Report 2012: Continental Surface Water; Vietnamese Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE): Hanoi, Vietnam, 2012.
- Phu, N. The Impacts of Climate Change on Agricultural Production and Sustainable Agriculture of Smallholder Farmers in Vietnam. Vietnam J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 4, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, P.T.; Vu, B.T.; Ngo, S.T.; Tran, V.D.; Ho, T.D. Ho Climate change and livelihood vulnerability of the rice farmers in the North Central Region of Vietnam: A case study in Nghe An province, Vietnam. Environ. Chall. 2022, 7, 100460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bich, T.H.; Quang, L.N.; Thanh Ha, L.T.; Duc Hanh, T.T.; Guha-Sapir, D. Impacts of flood on health: Epidemiologic evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Glob. Health Action 2011, 4, 6356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Storch, H. The Spatial Dimensions of Climate Change at the Mega-urban Scale in South East Asia: Urban Environmental Planning Strategies for Ho Chi Minh City’s Response to Climate Change. In Proceedings of the 45th ISOCARP Congress, Porto, Portugal, 20 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Rutten, M.; Van Dijk, M.; Van Rooij, W.; Hilderink, H. Land Use Dynamics, Climate Change, and Food Security in Vietnam: A Global-to-local Modeling Approach. World Dev. 2014, 59, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Congress of Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Law No: 45/2013/QH13 Land Law 2013; Congress of Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- People’s Committee of Dan Phuong District. Report: Dan Phuong District Land Use Planning for the Period 2021–2030; People’s Committee of Dan Phuong District: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2021.
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Pearson University Press: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Likert, R.A. A technique for measurements of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 1932, 140, 55. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.; Macmillan Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Hoang, T.; Chu, N.M.N. Analyze Research Data with SPSS; Hongduc Publisher: Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
Factors | Symbol | Evaluation Criteria |
---|---|---|
Policy mechanism (Po) | Po1 | Synchronisation between plans in the study area |
Po2 | Inspection and supervision of the implementation of the approved planning | |
Po3 | Regulations and criteria on environmental protection and sustainable development in land use planning | |
Economics (Ec) | Ec1 | Economic growth rate in the planning area |
Ec2 | The economic structure | |
Ec3 | Funding sources for land use planning | |
Society (So) | So1 | Urbanisation speed of the planning area |
So2 | Demographic characteristics of residents (population, educational level, livelihood, income, and so on) | |
So3 | Local culture, customs, and practices | |
Environment (En) | En1 | Current status of environmental quality |
En2 | Environmental issues in land use planning | |
En3 | Current status of climate change | |
Others | Ot1 | Staff capacity (advisers, leaders, managers, etc.) serving land use planning |
Ot2 | Synchronisation and inheritance in other plans | |
Ot3 | Planning orientation for the period 2021–2030 of the study area |
No | Land Use Criteria | Approved Planning Area (ha) | Results of Planning Implementation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Area (ha) | Compare with Set Targets | |||
Increase (+), Reduce (−) ha | ||||
1 | Agricultural land | 2561.1 | 3652.7 | 1091.6 |
- | Paddy land | 840.6 | 1338.0 | 497.4 |
- | Annual cropland | 724.0 | 1264.2 | 540.2 |
- | Perennial cropland | 759.7 | 603.5 | −156.2 |
- | Water surface land for fishing | 191.9 | 148.3 | −43.6 |
- | Others | 44.8 | 298.7 | 253.9 |
2 | Non-Agricultural land | 4944.6 | 3424.1 | −1520.5 |
- | Defense land | 17.3 | 13.3 | −4.0 |
- | Security land | 6.1 | 4.5 | −1.6 |
- | Industrial land | 115.6 | 63.7 | −51.9 |
- | Commercial and service land | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
- | Land for non-agricultural production establishments | 191.9 | 190.2 | −1.7 |
- | Land used for mineral activities | 110.4 | 0.0 | −110.4 |
- | Land for producing construction materials and making pottery | 140.2 | 130.4 | −9.8 |
- | Land for infrastructure development at national, city, district, and commune levels | 1742.7 | 960.4 | −782.3 |
- | Scenic land | 0.27 | 0.27 | |
- | Land for public entertainment and recreation areas | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
- | Rural homestead land | 1353.5 | 1111.3 | −242.2 |
- | Urban homestead land | 98.9 | 45.9 | −53.0 |
- | Land to build official agencíe | 34.3 | 14.3 | −20.0 |
- | Land to build non-profit agencies | 0.89 | 7.9 | 7.0 |
- | Religious lad | 11.3 | 16.2 | 4.9 |
- | Land for rivers, canals, creeks and streams | 1047.6 | 795.4 | −252.2 |
- | Land with the specialised water surface | 73.4 | 61.2 | −12.2 |
- | Others | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.18 |
3 | Unused land | 229.8 | 706.1 | 476.3 |
No | Independent Variable | Corrected Item–Rest Correlation | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Po1 | 0.760 | 0.756 |
2 | Po2 | 0.697 | 0.816 |
3 | Po3 | 0.711 | 0.803 |
4 | Ec1 | 0.497 | 0.936 |
5 | Ec2 | 0.736 | 0.893 |
6 | Ec3 | 0.829 | 0.704 |
7 | So1 | 0.715 | 0.903 |
8 | So2 | 0.924 | 0.834 |
9 | So3 | 0.824 | 0.834 |
10 | En1 | 0.830 | 0.719 |
11 | En2 | 0.846 | 0.807 |
12 | En3 | 0.849 | 0.880 |
13 | Ot1 | 0.403 | 0.807 |
14 | Ot2 | 0.722 | 0.566 |
15 | Ot3 | 0.739 | 0.546 |
Variable | Component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
En2 | 0.959 | |||
En1 | 0.952 | |||
En3 | 0.912 | |||
Ot1 | 0.908 | |||
Ec1 | 0.861 | |||
Po1 | 0.842 | |||
Po2 | 0.839 | |||
Po3 | 0.787 | |||
Ec3 | 0.641 | 0.505 | ||
Ec2 | 0.588 | 0.483 | ||
So2 | 0.943 | |||
So3 | 0.943 | |||
So1 | 0.861 | |||
Ot3 | 0.915 | |||
Ot2 | 0.909 | |||
KMO test | 0.769 | |||
Bartlett’s test | 0.000 |
Factors | Not Standardised | Normalised Β | t | Sig. | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Β | Std. Error | |||||
Constant | 1.245 × 10−16 | 0.070 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Po | 0.408 | 0.070 | 0.399 | 2.374 | 0.020 | 1.666 |
Ec | 0.454 | 0.070 | 0.464 | 3.281 | 0.003 | 1.831 |
So | 0.398 | 0.070 | 0.388 | 3.654 | 0.000 | 1.143 |
En | 0.368 | 0.070 | 0.245 | 4.550 | 0.001 | 1.774 |
Ot | 0.259 | 0.070 | 0.239 | 4.565 | 0.021 | 1.795 |
R2 | 0.571 | |||||
Durbin–Watson | 2.443 | |||||
ANOVA with F-test | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Trong, P.T.; Duc, V.T.; Truong, S.C.; Thanh, T.D.; Huu, D.N.; Scholz, W. Analysing Factors Influencing Land Use Planning for Sustainable Land Resource Management in Vietnam: A Case Study of Dan Phuong District in Hanoi City. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416557
Trong PT, Duc VT, Truong SC, Thanh TD, Huu DN, Scholz W. Analysing Factors Influencing Land Use Planning for Sustainable Land Resource Management in Vietnam: A Case Study of Dan Phuong District in Hanoi City. Sustainability. 2023; 15(24):16557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416557
Chicago/Turabian StyleTrong, Phuong Tran, Vien Tran Duc, Son Cao Truong, Thuy Doan Thanh, Duong Nong Huu, and Wolfgang Scholz. 2023. "Analysing Factors Influencing Land Use Planning for Sustainable Land Resource Management in Vietnam: A Case Study of Dan Phuong District in Hanoi City" Sustainability 15, no. 24: 16557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416557
APA StyleTrong, P. T., Duc, V. T., Truong, S. C., Thanh, T. D., Huu, D. N., & Scholz, W. (2023). Analysing Factors Influencing Land Use Planning for Sustainable Land Resource Management in Vietnam: A Case Study of Dan Phuong District in Hanoi City. Sustainability, 15(24), 16557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416557