3.1. Gender Relations in the Tomato Value Chain
Rural women play a major role in crop and livestock production in Punjab and Sindh. In Sindh, women are assuming increasing agricultural responsibilities in crop production due to the migration of men from rural to urban areas. In both Punjab and Sindh, women are involved in various crop-cultivation activities, such as seed preparation, transplanting, sowing, weeding, harvesting, threshing, and processing. Most of the farm operations conducted by women, such as seeding, weeding, and harvesting, are performed manually, despite the availability of agricultural machineries. Women have limited access to mechanized equipment and lack the skills and training to operate agricultural machineries [
17].
In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), women’s roles in agricultural activities are mainly within the boundaries of their household, especially in the central and southern parts of the province. Women work for about 12 to 15 h a day, spending half of their time on unpaid care and domestic work and half on agricultural activities, mainly livestock rearing. Unpaid care and domestic work (UCDW) refers to the often-invisible work of caring for children, the elderly, sick people, and those living with disabilities as well as cleaning, cooking, washing, collecting water, and fetching firewood, among other tasks. Women in the northern mountainous region of the province, where the Swat district is located, are relatively more involved in crop-production activities compared with those in the central and southern parts of the region. They participate in agricultural activities such as sowing, transplanting, weeding, hoeing, harvesting, picking vegetables, threshing, and winnowing. In the central zone of the province, women’s mobility is restricted due to socio-cultural norms. Women are expected to observe ‘Purdah,’ a practice of female seclusion that includes the physical segregation of the sexes and a requirement that women cover their bodies, so as to cover their skin and conceal their form. The Purdah restricts women from working in open public areas, such as fields, markets, etc., where there is more male presence. Women’s roles in the central zone of KP are limited to agricultural post-harvest activities, such as husking, cleaning, grading, and storage. In the southern part of KP, women’s roles in agriculture are related to their family income. Women from poorer families play a greater part in field-crop-cultivation activities [
17].
The section below describes the roles of male and female farmers in the tomato value chain, their access to agricultural inputs and advisory services, and their ability to provide input into production- and income-related decisions.
3.1.1. Gender Division of Labour in Tomato Production
In the study districts in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, all members of the household participate in tomato cultivation, carrying out different farm activities. Some activities, such as sowing, weeding, and harvesting, are mainly performed by women, while activities such as ploughing, irrigation, and spraying chemical pesticides are mainly performed by men (See
Table 1).
Women’s involvement in production activities is higher in Punjab compared with that of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province due to the socio-cultural context mentioned above. In the focus-group discussions with female farmers in Swat, KP, the responses indicated that half of the women in the community, mainly those from poorer families, were involved in tomato-production activities in the field. Male focus-group-discussion participants, on the other hand, said that women do not participate in field-crop-cultivation activities.
Both in Punjab and KP, the buying of agricultural inputs and the selling of produce is performed solely by men. This is due to the Purdah practice mentioned above. The few single-woman-headed households in Punjab and Sindh are the exceptions where women carry out these roles.
As indicated in
Figure 1 below, time-use patterns in the study districts show that men spend slightly more hours in a day than women on productive work, in crop cultivation and livestock production. Productive work refers to the work performed by women and men for pay in cash or kind, such as market production, informal production, home production, and subsistence production. However, women work more hours overall than men, counting both unpaid care and domestic work as well as productive work, and they have less time for rest, leisure, and selfcare.
3.1.2. Access to Assets, Resources, Inputs, and Technology for Production
Farmers obtain agricultural inputs for tomato production from various sources. In Muzaffargarh, farmers buy seeds from farmers’ groups within the community that are engaged in the commercial production of seeds. In the other study districts, seeds are bought from seed companies, agro-dealers, and government extension departments. Fertilizers and pesticides are bought from local agro-dealers. The low quality of seeds obtained from local agro-dealers, the increasing prices of fertilizers and pesticides, and the low effectiveness of pesticides due to pest resistance are some of challenges farmers face related to agricultural inputs. They cope by using manure to replace chemical fertilizers, to a small extent, and by buying inputs on credit from agro-dealers.
Female farmers face particular challenges in obtaining agricultural inputs. As mentioned above, social norms that restrict their mobility affect their ability to buy inputs from agro-dealers. They also lack information on improved seed varieties and which types of pesticides to use.
The most common sources of credit for farmers in the study areas are agricultural or commercial banks and commission agents. Commission agents are informal lenders who provide inputs on credit to farmers and act as sales agents, facilitating the sales of harvested crops and working on commissions. Cumbersome loan-application processes, low literacy levels, and high interest rates discourage farmers from borrowing from banks. Commission agents are the preferred source of credit for most farmers. However, low market prices of their agricultural outputs (tomatoes), high costs of inputs, and extreme weather conditions destroying crops reduce farmers’ abilities to repay loans. Sometimes, farmers have to sell livestock in order to repay their loans.
Female farmers’ access to credit is more restricted than that of male farmers due to a lack of ownership of assets that can be held as collateral. Women have limited access to productive and financial resources, such as land and non-land assets and financial services. Nationally, 95% of women do not own a bank account, 89% of married women do not own a house, and 96% of married women do not own land. Out of the total number of people with access to microfinances, women make up only 29%. Out of the total people currently accessing loans for agriculture, women make up only 4% [
18].
The main sources of agricultural information for farmers in the study areas are government agricultural extension departments, organizations such as CABI, and, to a small extent, local agro-dealers and commission agents. Agricultural officers and field assistants are the main public extension agents. Field assistants sometimes visit farmers to communicate agricultural information. However, since extension agents have large operational areas and are not able to visit all farmers, male farmers visit agricultural offices for updates or register their mobile phones with extension departments to receive information via text messages. Agricultural departments also have apps that they use to communicate information to farmers.
Female farmers have challenges accessing most of these informational sources. They are discouraged from visiting agricultural extension offices or interacting with agricultural officers and field assistants, who are mostly men, due to social norms. Although the government is trying to increase the amount of female extension staff, their number is still very small. Agricultural officers and field assistants make up the main field agricultural-extension personnel. In Punjab, 25% of the agricultural officers in the province are women while there are no female agricultural field assistants. In Sindh, 9% of the agriculture officers and 5% of the field assistants in the province are women [
19]. Although the number of agricultural extension officers is improving in Punjab, their contributions toward reaching female farmers in advisory services is limited due to social norms and a lack of recognition of women as farmers who need advisory support. Female farmers also lack the means of transportation to travel to distant rural areas [
17,
19]. Social norms prevent women from registering their mobile phones with agricultural departments to receive information. In addition, women in rural areas have low rates of mobile-phone ownership. Pakistan’s Living Standards Measurement Survey of 2019e found that 26% of women owned mobile phones compared with 65% of men [
18]. Low literacy levels are another challenge for female farmers in accessing agricultural information.
In the past few years, various agricultural technologies and practices have been promoted to improve tomato production and post-harvest management in the study sites. Some of these include improved seed varieties, tomato seedling trays, raised nursery beds, mulching, drip irrigation, tunnel farming, vertical farming, corrugated packaging boxes, and plastic crates. Some of the technologies helped to improve production and reduce the costs of labour. For example, the practice of mulching helped to reduce the costs of labour needed for hoeing and weeding. Seedling trays and improved varieties helped to increase seedling production for commercial purposes.
Female FGD participants in Punjab mentioned that some of these practices and technologies increased women’s involvement in production and the time and labour required of them. However, they were not able to reap the monetary benefits of increased production or the commercial production of seedlings, as the selling was performed by men and the income was controlled by men. Their increased involvement led to higher work burdens and less time for household work, while they did not have a say on the use of the money earned.
Male FGD participants agreed that while most of the promoted technologies and practices benefitted men, the benefits for women were limited. The only income women are able to control is the income they earn from working as farm labourers on the tomato farms of rich land owners, where they engage in sowing, planting, hoeing, and harvesting. However, the daily wage that women earn as farm labourers is very low at 200 Pakistani Rupee (PKR) per day, i.e., $0.90, which is below the minimum-wage rate set by the government.
Most agricultural assets, such as land, agricultural equipment and machineries, means of transport, and large livestock, are controlled and owned by men. In Punjab, women have access to land (use right) and large livestock, such as cattle, and they can own small livestock, such as sheep and poultry. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, women can only access small livestock.
3.1.3. Decision Making in Production and Marketing and Control over Income from Production of Tomatoes
Both in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, almost all of the production decisions in tomato cultivation are made by men in the household. Men decide on the types of tomato varieties to grow and on the use of various agricultural inputs and technologies. However, since women provide a significant portion of the labour needed for tomato cultivation, they are consulted when a decision is made to cultivate tomato and on the implementation of the various activities that they are responsible for. In Punjab, women are sometimes consulted on the allocation of family plots for the cultivation of different crops.
A lack of information is one of the reasons for women’s inability to participate in production decisions. According to both male and female focus-group-discussion participants, women do not have the information or knowledge about seed varieties or various technologies to have an input in the decision making. Men, on the other hand, interact with agricultural commission agents, market actors, and other farmers to understand the market demand and new farming practices and technologies. Single, female heads of households are the exception. They are able to make all production decisions.
The selling of tomatoes is fully the responsibility of men. Large-sale producers transport the produce on trucks to markets in the main provincial towns or in the national capital—Islamabad. Small-scale produce is sold in local markets to middle men or contractors, transported by tractors, rikshaw, and animal carts. Group marketing is performed by farmers to transport their produce to distant markets. In the Sheikhupura district in Punjab, farmers also sometimes sell to processing factories.
The revenue from tomato production is controlled by men in both Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Women are given about 10% of the revenue to cover some personal and childcare expenses. The rest, 90%, is managed by men and used mainly to repay loans for agricultural inputs, hire farm labourers, purchase agricultural inputs and assets such as land and livestock, and cover children’s education and family members’ health expenses, in that order.
3.2. Dissemination and Uptake of the Biocontrol Method in the Study Sites
This section describes the processes of technology selection and communication in the study sites from the perspectives of the experts and extension staff involved in the selection and dissemination of Trichogramma as a bio-control agent and from the male and female farmers who used the bio-control method. It presents data from the key-informant interviews with researchers, public- and private-bio-control-laboratory managers, and agricultural extension staff, as well as data from the in-depth interviews with farmers who used the bio-control method.
The researchers and bio-control-laboratory managers were asked how the bio-control agent was selected for production and distribution by their organizations, how it was piloted and disseminated, and how they measured the success of the technology and the perceived benefits for female farmers.
In the Punjab province, Trichogramma was identified and promoted by the Agriculture Department as a bio-control agent for use in controlling the important insect pests that affect crops and vegetables in the province. The department has set up bio-control laboratories in 11 districts for the mass rearing of Trichogramma. The laboratories provided Trichogramma egg cards, free of charge, to farmers through the agricultural extension departments.
In the Sindh province, Trichogramma was promoted by sugar mill factories who used to provide Trichogramma egg cards for registered farmers who were engaged in sugarcane production. The sugar mill factories in the study districts no longer supply farmers with egg cards.
In the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, the use of
Trichogramma as a bio-control agent was promoted by the Malakand Rural Development Project, which was supported by ADB and implemented from 1997 to 2008 (
https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/malakand-rural-development-project accessed on 28 August 2022). The project established a biological laboratory to produce 29 million
Trichogramma parasitoids for farmers, which was later destroyed in a conflict with the Taliban [
20].
Agricultural extension departments monitored the success of the technology by counting the number of emerged eggs on cards and reviewing the feedback received from farmers about reductions in the frequency of pesticide spraying and reduced expenditures on pesticides.
According to the key informants, the perceived benefit of the bio-control method for female farmers is the reduction of harm to their health caused by exposure to insecticides. Women are responsible for harvesting tomatoes, and they are exposed to health hazards when they work in the field immediately after chemical spraying.
For all farmers, in general, the bio-control method was expected to have several benefits. It was expected to reduce insecticide application and therefore the cost of production, reduce environmental problems due to insecticide residue, and provide long-term protection against pests once the bio-control agents established themselves in the field. It was also expected to reduce the level of effort required to control pests compared with that of pesticide use, as it is easy to install Trichogramma egg cards in the field.
According to the key informants, the disadvantage of Trichogramma is that it is a slow process for the natural control of pests. Furthermore, the transportation of cards from laboratories to fields, which requires special arrangements due to the low temperature (8–12 degrees Celsius) the cards need to be kept in, is considered challenging.
The agricultural extension staff involved in the dissemination of this technology were asked how they make decisions regarding which technologies to promote and whom to target and about the methods used for training farmers and the efforts made to reach female farmers in the trainings.
In all the study areas, the technologies promoted by the agricultural extension staff are decided by the provincial agricultural departments along with the groups/types of farmers to be targeted in the promotion of the technology.
For the dissemination of Trichogramma in Punjab, the districts’ agricultural extension offices set up demonstration plots on the fields of progressive farmers, all male, and provided trainings using the Farmer Field School Approach to clusters of farmers. The criteria for the selection of progressive farmers included: their interest in using new methods of pest control, their ownership of at least one acre of farm land, the location of their farm land, and the social activity of the farmer, i.e., having good relationships with other farmers in the community or being seen as a role model. Farmers targeted by the training were mostly male farmers engaged in the production of tomato or sugarcane.
According to most of the interviewed agricultural extension staff, women were not targeted in the trainings because the extension agents were mainly men, who only interact with male farmers. Female farmers were expected to receive the information through trained male members of their households. There was no intent by the agricultural departments to target women in the dissemination of the technology, as women either are not considered to be directly involved in farming or have only supporting roles according to the agricultural department staff in Sheikhupura, Punjab, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. However, in the Muzaffargarh and Multan districts, where organizations such as CABI and FAO supported the promotion of Trichogramma, efforts were made to reach female farmers by hiring female agricultural facilitators.
3.2.1. Knowledge Sources for Trichogramma
As indicated in
Table 2, below, female farmers in Punjab learned about the bio-control agent by attending trainings organized by the agricultural extension departments together with organizations such as CABI (in the Muzafargarh district) and FAO (in the Multan and Muzafargarh districts). FAO-supported interventions involved ‘women open schools,’ similar to the Farmer Field School approach but exclusively targeting female farmers. The female respondents also gained the information by sharing their experiences with other female and male farmers in their villages. The trainings included video demonstrations on how to apply
Trichogramma in the field and discussions on the benefits of using it. Half of the female respondents said that after the training, they learned the practical applications of
Trichogramma by observing other farmers (neighbours, female lead farmers, and, in a couple of cases, family members) applying it on the field. In the Sheikhupura district, some female farmers participated in community trainings and field demonstrations organized by male agricultural extension agents. Only one of the female farmers interviewed in Punjab mentioned that she had learned about the bio-control agent from her husband who attended a training. She was not involved in the application of the bio-control agent and was not aware of the benefits or changes brought about by using it.
In Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, all the interviewed female farmers had learned about the bio-control method from male family members, who were either informed by landlords or plant doctors or attended trainings organized by the extension departments (See
Table 2).
All male respondents in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa had received information about
Trichogramma by attending trainings and field demonstrations organized by the agricultural extension departments (See
Table 2).
3.2.2. Use, Access, and Availability of Trichogramma
Most of the interviewed farmers in Punjab had started using Trichogramma as a bio-control agent in the past two years. They used Trichogramma to control the pests, such as Helicoverapa armigera, fruit borer, sugarcane top borer, etc., that affected tomato, bell pepper, sugarcane, cotton, and maize crops. It was used in both tunnel farming and open fields. The farmers in Sindh used Trichogramma to control sugarcane borers. Respondents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa used Trichogramma to control the pests, such as the Codling moth and Helicoverpa armigera, that affected peach, apple, and tomato crops.
In Punjab, as described above, farmers obtained Trichogramma egg cards through agricultural departments free of cost. However, according to female respondents in Multan and Muzaffargarh, this supply was not reliable and, after using Trichogramma for one or two cropping seasons, they had reverted to using chemical pesticides. Male farmers in Multan also mentioned that the lack of commercial availability of the cards had made it difficult to continue using the bio-control agent. A few of the female respondents in Muzaffargarh and Multan mentioned that they bought the cards from agricultural departments or bio-control laboratories. However, none of the experts interviewed confirmed that the cards were sold by agricultural departments or bio-control laboratories.
In Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the interviewed farmers were no longer using Trichogramma due to of the lack of supply, as discussed above.
3.2.3. Decision-Making on Trichogramma Use
The interviewed women in Punjab were involved in their households’ decisions to use the bio-control method. Sixteen out of the twenty-one interviewed female farmers in Punjab said that male members in the household had consulted with them before making the decision to use Trichogramma. This was due to the fact that women’s labour is needed to put Trichogramma egg cards in the field, unlike in the application of chemical pesticides. The fact that most of the interviewed women had participated in the trainings also contributed to their involvement in decision making.
In Sindh, all the interviewed farmers worked on land owned by landlords, and the decision to use Trichogramma was made by the landlords. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, men made the decision to use the bio-control agent.
3.3. Impact of the Bio-Control Method on Time and Labour of Male and Female Farmers
Farmers who were using Trichogramma as a bio-control method were asked about the changes they had experienced after they started using it. Specifically, they were asked about changes to their cultivation practices, changes in the difficulty of and time taken for pest management, and about shifts in the gender roles of pest management as a result of using the technology.
Female farmers who were using Trichogramma in KP and Punjab, Sindh, said that it helped to reduce the time and labour spent on pest management by farming households. It reduced the amount of pesticide sprayed on farms. The households saved time on purchasing and mixing chemical pesticides. According to a little over half of the female respondents in all three provinces (15 out of 27 users), the frequency of the application of chemical pesticides reduced from 3 or 4 times in a cropping season to only once. Putting egg cards in the field took less time than spraying, and it reduced the need for hiring labourers to apply chemical pesticides.
Women started taking part in pest management because the bio-control agent was easier for women to apply compared with chemical pesticides. Half of the women interviewed in Punjab (11 out of 21 users) had participated in putting Trichogramma egg cards in the field. A quarter (7 out of 27) of the respondents in the three provinces said that it helped to reduce the health risks they faced, such as skin allergies and breathing problems, while working in the field after chemical pesticides were sprayed. A little over a third of the respondents in the three provinces (8 out of 27) said that chemical pesticides were not very effective, while one mentioned that Trichogramma had a longer-lasting effect than chemical pesticides.
All male respondents in the three provinces agreed that applying Trichogramma egg cards required less time and labour compared with spraying chemical pesticides. Chemical pesticides were sprayed weekly, according to the male respondents, while the cards needed to be changed only once every two weeks. However, most of them said that they still needed to use chemical pesticides because Trichogramma only helped to control chewing lepidopteran insects, and that they needed to use insecticides to control other groups of pests, or sucking insects. In addition, the insecticides used affected the adult Trichogramma in the field. Trichogramma was effective when there was a small population of insects, but they needed to use insecticides in cases of high-insect-population outbreaks. Nevertheless, using Trichogramma helped to reduce the number of insecticides applied on the farm and the frequency of spraying. Male respondents in KP mentioned the difficulties of transporting Trichogramma egg cards due to the temperature control needed.
3.5. Non-Users of the Bio-Control Method
In-depth interviews were conducted with male and female farmers who were not users of the bio-control method but lived in the same communities as farmers who did use Trichogramma. They were asked about their knowledge of the bio-control method and its benefits, their reasons for not using it, and what would encourage them to use it in the future.
3.5.1. Knowledge and Perception of the Benefits of Trichogramma
Almost all male and female farmers who were not using Trichogramma in the three provinces had heard about it, or they had seen it being used by other farmers in their community. A couple of the female farmers in Punjab had attended awareness-raising sessions on the bio-control method, which were organized by agricultural extension agents and community mobilizers. All the male respondents in KP had gained information about it by participating in extension meetings organized by agricultural offices or from Farm Service Centres and field demonstrations.
Most of the non-using female respondents in Punjab and Sindh believed that using the bio-control method was beneficial for different reasons. They assumed that Trichogramma helped to improve the quality of produce and, therefore, enabled farmers to receive a better price for their products. They said that Trichogramma did not pose health risks and, with the reduction in chemical-pesticide use, that it eliminated the associated health risks. They assumed it was cost effective because it reduced the money spent to purchase chemical pesticides. They also said that it saved time and labour as there was less chemical spraying. Additionally, some respondents believed that pesticide-free products would bring better market prices. Two female respondents, from Sindh and KP, held a different view. The respondent in Sindh said that Trichogramma took a long time to be effective, or that it was a slow process compared with chemical pesticides, while the respondent from KP believed that it was not effective in controlling pests based on information she had received from other farmers who had tried the bio-control method.
Non-using male farmers in Punjab and KP agreed that Trichogramma was easier to apply and needed less time and labour compared with chemical pesticides. They also said it caused less harm to the environment. Male farmers in KP also assumed that agricultural produce that was free of pesticides would have a higher market price. However, all the male respondents in Punjab said that it did not provide quick results or the same level of pest control as chemical pesticides. They stated that when the population of pests increased, spraying insecticides became necessary.
3.5.2. Interest in Using Trichogramma in the Future and Reasons for Not Using Currently
More than half of the non-using female respondents (six out of thirteen) in the three provinces were interested in using Trichogramma if it were commercially available and if technical support or training on its use were provided. A few of the female respondents (four out of thirteen) said that they wanted to see evidence of the effectiveness of Trichogramma on demonstration plots and observe the experiences of other farmers before adopting the bio-control method. Two women, in Sindh and KP, said that they were not interested because they did not believe it was effective or had seen farmers using it before who had not received good results.
When male farmers were asked if they were interested in adopting Trichogramma as a bio-control agent in the future, one of the respondents in Punjab said that he would not, as chemical pesticides (insecticides) provided quick results. Two of the male respondents in Punjab and three male respondents in KP said that they would want to see the effectiveness of Trichogramma compared with other chemical pesticides on demonstration plots before deciding to use it.
For most of the female farmers in Punjab and Sindh (ten out of thirteen), their reasons for not using Trichogramma were a lack of information about the source of the supply and a lack of training on its application and use. In a few cases (five out of thirteen), a fear of risk and doubts about its effectiveness were also mentioned as reasons. More than half of the female respondents in the three provinces (seven out of thirteen) also said that they were not able to make decisions on farm technologies, including pest-management methods, as these decisions were made by male members of the household.
For male non-using farmers in Punjab, their main reason for not adopting Trichogramma was concern about its effectiveness. For male farmers in KP, however, it was due to a lack of both information about the supply and knowledge about the application of Trichogramma. According to the male respondents in Punjab, the results obtained from using Trichogramma were not uniform. They mentioned that the effectiveness of Trichogramma could be affected by weather conditions or if, for example, farmers on adjoining fields sprayed chemical pesticides. They also mentioned that pest control using Trichogramma took time, while pesticides gave quick results. One farmer said that using Trichogramma was not appropriate for him because he needed to spray chemical pesticides to manage other pests on other crops.
3.5.3. Current Pest-Management Practices
Half of the female non-users in Punjab were using chemical pesticides at the time of the interview, while half also used bio-pesticides, such as neem extract, in addition to chemical pesticides, especially in kitchen gardens. In Sindh and KP, all the female respondents were using chemical pesticides, while one female respondent in KP said that she also sometimes used ‘ash.’ All the male respondents in Punjab and KP were using chemical pesticides.