Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System Based on Dynamic Ore Blending Decisions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- The existing methods are mostly designed to deploy trucks to reduce production costs, without considering the blending problem of the selected ores.
- (2)
- In some open-pit mines, an ore blending plan would be made before each shift of production and issued to the truck dispatcher for implementation. However, it often happens that the shovel cannot participate in the production due to faults and other reasons, for example, the ore grades near the shovel vary greatly or the rough crusher fails. In such cases, there would be inconsistencies between the ore blending target and the actual results.
- (3)
- The existing truck dispatching methods for open-pit mines cannot meet the dual requirements of ore blending and truck dispatching in open-pit mine production.
2. Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System
2.1. Intelligent Ore Blending Module
- (1)
- Through the interface of the ITDM, the position coordinates of the shovel to be involved in the production of this shift are obtained.
- (2)
- Send the location coordinate to the I3DDGM through the data interface to obtain the ore grade data of the location coordinate.
- (3)
- The shovels shall be grouped, and the shovels with grade data less than 3% shall be distributed together, with 2~4 shovels allocated to each group.
- (4)
- Before the production of each shift, the ore blending plan is generated, with the ore transport proportion from each shovel listed to each uploading point. The plan is then sent to the ITDM.
- (5)
- If a shovel fails in production, the on-board terminal of the shovel will send the fault information to the ITDM, which would in turn sends the information to the IOBM. The ore blending module will assign the work tasks of the failed shovel to other shovels in the same group according to the previous shovel groups, and send the regenerated ore blending plan to the ITDM for execution.
- (6)
- The ITDM would record the real-time production data during the implementation process. When the ore grade deviation at the unloading point reaches more than 10%, the ITDM will send a request to the IOBM, and the IOBM will regenerate the ore blending plan and send it to the ITDM for implementation.
2.2. Intelligent 3D Digital Geological Module
- (1)
- The I3DDGM can realize 3D solid modeling of mine geology, accurately describe the geological distribution, and meet the ore blending requirements.
- (2)
- With its data management function, I3DDGM can manage geological basic data such as drilling and survey, and color display the drilling, existing ore body, and surface model.
- (3)
- With the ore body measurement function, the I3DDGM can quickly calculate and verify the physical volume, ore volume, grade, and other information.
- (4)
- The I3DDGM has the function of automatically connecting the geological level and automatically updating the geological model of the blasting area.
- (5)
- The I3DDGM has the function of model modification and management.
2.3. On-Board Terminal
2.4. Communication Network
3. Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching Method
- (1)
- Obtain the ore blending plan generated by the intelligent ore blending module.
- (2)
- Set the shovel priority and the unloading point priority.
- (3)
- The trucks can start working when ready and the truck drivers receive the task order through the on-board terminal.
- (4)
- Dispatch trucks to the shovel for ore loading according to the priority of the shovel, and record the loading amount.
- (5)
- According to the priority of the ore unloading point, the trucks should be sent to the ore unloading point for ore unloading, and the amount should be recorded.
- (6)
- Calculate the proportion of ore discharged at each ore unloading point from each shovel.
- (7)
- Compare the proportion calculated in step (6) with that of ore blending plan in step (1) to determine the next shovel and the unloading point for the truck.
- (8)
- Send a truck to the shovel to load ore according to the calculation result in step (7), and record the loading amount.
- (9)
- According to the calculation results in step (7), send a truck to the ore unloading point for ore unloading and record the ore unloading amount.
- (10)
- Go back to step (6) until the production of the shift is completed.
4. Experiment and Results
4.1. Example 1
- (1)
- Obtain the ore blending plan generated by the intelligent ore blending module, that is, obtain the data in Table 1.
- (2)
- Set the priority of the shovel and the priority of the unloading point, and the priority sequence of the shovel from high to low is No.16, No.17, No.2, No.12, and No.14. The priority sequence of unloading points from high to low is 1 and 2.
- (3)
- The current shift starts to work, and truck drivers log in and go online one after another through on-board terminals to request trucks dispatching tasks.
- (4)
- Arrange the trucks to shovel No.16, No.17, No.2, No.12, and No.14 according to the sequence of tasks requested by truck drivers online, and record the loading capacity.
- (5)
- The truck load is 120 t. After the truck is full, the truck should be dispatched to unloading point 1 according to the priority of unloading point to unload ore, and the unloading amount should be recorded.
- (6)
- When five electric shovels complete the loading task of the five trucks, and the ore is unloaded into unloading point 1, the proportion of north crushing completed by each electric shovel is 20%.
- (7)
- Compare the proportion calculated in step (6) with that of the ore blending plan in step (1). The next truck should be sent to the No.12 electric shovel to load ore at unloading point 2, and the following truck should be sent to the No.14 shovel to load ore at unloading point 1.
- (8)
- Send a truck to the shovel to load ore according to the calculation results in step (7), and record the loading volume.
- (9)
- According to the calculation results in step (7), send a truck to the ore unloading point for ore unloading and record the ore unloading amount.
- (10)
- Return to step (6) to recalculate the proportion of each ore unloading point completed by each shovel until the shift is completed.
4.2. Example 2
5. Discussion
- (1)
- If the production is carried out according to the original ore blending plan, the grade of ores transported and uploaded to the south crushing is 30.14%.
- (2)
- The ore blending plan was adjusted due to the failure of the No. 16 electric shovel. If the production is carried out according to the adjusted ore blending plan, the ore grade of the south crushing is 29.88%.
- (3)
- When the No. 16 electric shovel failed and the ore blending plan was not adjusted, the production was still carried out according to the original plan, and the ore grade of the south crushing was 29.51%.
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- The system and the method proposed in this paper combines open-pit ore blending with truck dispatching, which not only optimizes truck dispatching but also improves ore blending.
- (2)
- The system and method proposed in this paper have the dynamic optimization function for open-pit ore blending and truck dispatching in emergencies in production (such as sudden equipment failure), which is more in line with the actual situation of the open-pit production site.
- (3)
- The system and the method proposed in this paper are produced according to the proportion of ore blending plan, which not only ensures the requirements of ore dressing grade at the ore unloading point, but also ensures the requirements of the maximum output and the shortest transportation distance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Goodfellow, R.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Algorithmic integration of geological uncertainty in pushback designs for complex multiprocess open pit mines. Min. Technol. 2013, 122, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferland, J.A.; Amaya, J.; Djuimo, M.S. Application of a particle swarm algorithm to the capacitated open pit mining problem. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, Palmerston, New Zealand, 11–14 December 2006; pp. 127–132. [Google Scholar]
- Shishvan, M.S.; Sattarvand, J. Long term production planning of open pit mines by ant colony optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 240, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumral, M. Optimizing ore–waste discrimination and block sequencing through simulated annealing. Appl. Soft Comput. 2013, 13, 3737–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Niemann-Delius, C. Production Scheduling of Open Pit Mines Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Adv. Oper. Res. 2014, 2014, 208502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montiel, L.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Stochastic mine production scheduling with multiple processes: Application at Escondida Norte, Chile. J. Min. Sci. 2013, 49, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.S.; Li, F.P. Iron Ore Blending Based on Linear Programming. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 443, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boland, N.; Dumitrescu, I.; Froyland, G.; Gleixner, A.M. LP-based disaggregation approaches to solving the open pit mining production scheduling problem with block processing selectivity. Comput. Oper. Res. 2009, 36, 1064–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambert, W.B.; Newman, A.M. Tailored Lagrangian Relaxation for the open pit block sequencing problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 2014, 222, 419–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, E.; Rezakhah, M.; Newman, A.; Ferreira, F. Linear models for stockpiling in open-pit mine production scheduling problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 260, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Consuegra, F.R.A.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Algorithmic approach to pushback design based on stochastic programming: Method, application and comparisons. Min. Technol. 2010, 119, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamghari, A.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. A diversified Tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 222, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodfellow, R.C.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Global optimization of open pit mining complexes with uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 40, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramazan, S.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Production scheduling with uncertain supply: A new solution to the open pit mining problem. Optim. Eng. 2013, 14, 361–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benndorf, J.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Stochastic long-term production scheduling of iron ore deposits: Integrating joint multi-element geological uncertainty. J. Min. Sci. 2013, 49, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leite, A.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Stochastic optimisation model for open pit mine planning: Application and risk analysis at copper deposit. Min. Technol. 2007, 116, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Zhang, K.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Ming, Z.; Huang, J.Z.; Lu, N. A smart artificial bee colony algorithm with distance-fitness-based neighbor search and its application. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 89, 478–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafrasteh, B.; Fathianpour, N. A hybrid simultaneous perturbation artificial bee colony and back-propagation algorithm for training a local linear radial basis neural network on ore grade estimation. Neurocomputing 2017, 235, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Gu, Q.; Wang, R.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, C. Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Resources: Optimal Blending of Polymetallic Ore Using an Improved NSGA-III Algorithm. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Liu, C.; Huang, G.; Xu, K.; Yuan, Q. Multi-Source and Multi-Target Iron Ore Blending Method in Open Pit Mine. Arch. Min. Sci. 2022, 67, 631–644. [Google Scholar]
- Kou, X.; Xie, X.; Zou, Y.; Kang, Q.; Liu, Q. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Model of a Truck Dispatching System in Open-Pit Mine. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Icarte Ahumada, G.; Diaz Pinto, J.; Herzog, O. A Dynamic Scheduling Multiagent System for Truck Dispatching in Open-Pit Mines. In Agents and Artificial Intelligence; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 132–148. [Google Scholar]
- Ahumada, G.I.; Riveros, E.; Herzog, O. An Agent-based System for Truck Dispatching in Open-pit Mines. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART), Valletta, Malta, 22–24 February 2020; pp. 73–81. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, B.; Tian, T.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Peng, Y. A Dynamic Dispatching Method for Large-Scale Interbay Material Handling Systems of Semiconductor FAB. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohtasham, M.; Mirzaei-Nasirabad, H.; Askari-Nasab, H.; Alizadeh, B. Multi-stage optimization framework for the real-time truck decision problem in open-pit mines: A case study on Sungun copper mine. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2022, 36, 461–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.; Linderoth, J.; Luedtke, J. Optimization-based dispatching policies for open-pit mining. Optim. Eng. 2021, 22, 1347–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, D.; Sari, Y.A.; Kealey, R.; Zhang, Q. Reinforcement Learning-Based Fleet Dispatching for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in Open-Pit Mining Operations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shovel No. | Ore Grade (%) | North Crushing Ratio (%) | South Crushing Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|
16 | 35.19 | 13.74 | 11.10 |
17 | 33.12 | 20 | 0.00 |
2 | 32.38 | 15.94 | 53.44 |
12 | 25.18 | 26.72 | 35.46 |
14 | 26.46 | 23.6 | 0.00 |
No. | Ore Unloading Point | Grade Prediction (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | North Crushing | 29.59 |
2 | South Crushing | 30.14 |
Shovel No. | Ore Grade (%) | North Crushing Ratio (%) | South Crushing Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|
16 | 35.19 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 33.12 | 26.87 | 5.55 |
2 | 32.38 | 22.81 | 58.99 |
12 | 25.18 | 26.72 | 35.46 |
14 | 26.46 | 23.6 | 0.00 |
No. | Ore Unloading Point | Grade Prediction (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | North Crushing | 29.26 |
2 | South Crushing | 29.88 |
No. | Ore Unloading Point | Grade Prediction (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | North Crushing | 28.70 |
2 | South Crushing | 29.51 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yao, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, H.; Hou, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Yuan, W. Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System Based on Dynamic Ore Blending Decisions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043399
Yao J, Wang Z, Chen H, Hou W, Zhang X, Li X, Yuan W. Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System Based on Dynamic Ore Blending Decisions. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):3399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043399
Chicago/Turabian StyleYao, Jiang, Zhiqiang Wang, Hongbin Chen, Weigang Hou, Xiaomiao Zhang, Xu Li, and Weixing Yuan. 2023. "Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System Based on Dynamic Ore Blending Decisions" Sustainability 15, no. 4: 3399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043399
APA StyleYao, J., Wang, Z., Chen, H., Hou, W., Zhang, X., Li, X., & Yuan, W. (2023). Open-Pit Mine Truck Dispatching System Based on Dynamic Ore Blending Decisions. Sustainability, 15(4), 3399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043399