Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- This study proposes a classification to categorise the existing literature into multiple dimensions linked to the present current research issues in the smart cities paradigm. The primary issues connected with each category of urban computing are highlighted based on a literature study of recently published studies. To simplify this procedure, we have identified nine technologies: deep learning, big data, pervasive and mobile intelligence, multi-cloud, cognitive computing, smart automation, blockchain, cyber security, and the Internet of Things.
- We built a taxonomy of the most pertinent urban computing and smart city literature based on urban data, methodologies, applications, supporting technology, and implications. Each parameter was studied independently, and the key results were presented for the purpose of constructing effective smart urban computing sustainable city contexts.
- We qualitatively analyse the role of urban computing in smart cities by providing several applications and technologies, such as intelligent transit, smart homes, and smart automobiles.
- Using significant use cases, such as energy consumption, transportation, government policy, and business process, we demonstrate the significance of urban computing in smart cities.
- We cover several unanswered research questions affecting the future growth of urban computing in smart cities. Using data from the published literature, we determined that the following research topics—cognitive cybersecurity, air quality, IoT resources, cyber-physical system, data sparsity, data movement, 5G technologies, scaling via the analysis and harvesting of energy, and knowledge versus privacy—could be potential key research areas in the advancement of urban computing for smart cities.
2. Methodology
3. State of the Current Research
4. Taxonomy
4.1. Urban Data
4.2. Opportunities
4.2.1. Simulation Modelling
4.2.2. Urban Mobility
4.2.3. Ubiquitous Cities
4.2.4. Outliers Detection
4.3. Key Applications
4.4. Implications
5. Prominent Use Cases of Urban Computing in Smart Cities
- Urban computing for smart cities: To build an intelligent city, effective planning is imperative. One of the most important application domains in urban computing is smart city planning. With the advancement of human civilisation, the need for smart city planning that can incorporate transportation and land use planning cannot be overestimated, so as to aid the development of social environments and the economy of the society. Moreover, urbanisation is growing rapidly in many developing countries; therefore, the need for new technologies that can remotely understand urban changes and give key data for a smart city's maintainability is very important.
- In most cases, carrying out smart city planning requires the evaluation of many factors, such as human mobility, traffic flow, and road network structures. These factors are highly complex and evolve fast; hence, this makes smart city planning a very challenging task. For instance, in order to understand urban travelling designs, a few research works were conducted based on travel assessment information [139,140]. Hereafter, finding useful areas in a city is very important. Useful areas such as business districts and educational support for various requirements of people’s urban lives stand as key techniques for shaping and outlining comprehensive information about an urban city. Therefore, understanding key useful areas in a given city can standardise urban planning, further fast-tracking other things, such as choosing a location for business purposes. In a study by Yuan, Zheng et al. [141], the authors proposed a new framework named DRoF. This framework identifies areas of diverse roles in an urban city by utilising people's movements between areas and POIs in a given region. In another study by Sheng, Zheng et al. [142], the authors also explored some useful areas with a related distribution of POIs in a given region.
- Urban computing for the environment in smart cities: Cities are currently facing multitudes of problems that result in huge challenges. For example, in several developing countries, air pollution is a big issue and a great concern. In most of these countries, governments have constructed a relative number of air quality monitoring stations in cities to notify individuals of the amount of pollution in the air in a given area. However, urban air quality is very lopsided in cities that depend on multiple complex factors such as meteorology, land use, and traffic volume. Therefore, building many monitoring stations can be highly expensive with regard to human resources, land use, and money. Hence, people will not identify the air quality if a city is devoid of monitoring stations. Zheng, Liu et al. [143] proposed a cloud-based system that deduces real-time information on air quality in a city based on reported historic and instantaneous air quality information. In a study by Becker, Caceres et al. [144], the authors retrieved information from cellular calls to comprehend city aspects that brought on people's movements. Furthermore, another study by [145] proposed the handling of outbound phone calls to illustrate people's movements. Later, a study was conducted to extract data on mobility from hints of phones [146]. The other form of pollution affecting people in smart cities is noise. This kind of pollution can result in physical and mental health problems for people. The initial step in understanding urban noise is to measure the noise level in a city. In a study by Liu, Zheng et al. [147], the researchers proposed two methods for measuring urban noise levels. In other case studies [148,149], the studies are based on mobile-phone-based approaches that explore the noise state in New York City. Furthermore, in a study by Martí, Rodríguez et al. [150], the authors proposed a mobile application to determine noise contamination with the participation of citizens. Several countries such as the USA, the UK, and Germany are monitoring noise pollution. These countries utilise noise maps to access noise pollution levels. The noise maps are computed using simulations that are reliant on inputs, such as vehicle type, road type, and traffic flow data. Because collecting such information is highly expensive, these maps can be updated only after a long period of time. In the study by Santini, Ostermaier et al. [151], the authors obtained noise pollution data in urban areas with the utilisation of wireless sensor networks. However, deploying such technology in big cities can be very expensive with respect to both finances and human resources.
- Urban computing for energy consumption in smart cities: Rapid urbanisation and the development of smart cities are consuming a vast amount of energy [152]. Hence, obtaining technologies that can sense city-scale energy costs, increase energy infrastructures, and also decrease the amount of energy consumption is critical. We have two forms of energy consumption in urban cities: gas energy consumption and electrical energy consumption. Concerning gas consumption, a study by [153] proposed a method to aid in the instantaneous detection of refuelling behaviour of people and of whole citywide petrol intake. This method analyses and draws interpretations from GPS routes that are passively retrieved by cabs. Ref. [154] infer the gas intake and pollution discharge of automobiles commuting on a city road network utilising GPS technology from a section of automobiles. The results show that given a road's traffic volume and travel speed, the gas intake and discharge can be determined based on the current environment. With regard to electricity consumption, to enhance domestic energy consumption, an effective combination of energy from renewable sources to meet the increasing request via electric vehicles is key to sustainability. Smart algorithms employed at the technology level or communal level will help in staying within a community-assigned energy intake level. In a study by [155], the authors make sure that each automobile within a community is organised using a strengthening learning agent, which a temporary load prediction algorithm will additionally sustain. In another study, [156] proposed a new framework that will help in supporting charging and storage structure design for electric vehicles.
- Urban computing for transportation in smart cities: Concerning urban computing for transportation in smart cities, the pillar of city life is transportation. However, transportation authorities normally have no instantaneous outlook on traffic position. Hence, the huge dependency on petroleum along with the environmental effects of discharges from fossil fuel intake make the energy intake of urban transportation in smart cities a challenging issue to overcome. Furthermore, the key part of a transportation system is the refuelling behaviour of vehicles by individuals. Hence, a method for identifying global information in an instantaneous manner is proposed by Zhang, Wilkie et al. [153]. In Montreal [157], websites are integrated with LTE to provide a voluminous machine-to-machine (M2M) model for traffic. The model has the capacity to determine the position of smart meters, traffic lights, and smart bus stops. It allows the analytics of traffic data collected from the M2M model.
- Urban computing for government policy in smart cities: Urban computing plays a role in new government policy, such that the introduction of new government policy in smart cities can come with anxiety/panic in citizens living in the smart cities because of fear of the unknown or uncertainty about the impact of the new policy on the citizens. Governments can leverage urban computing to understand the likely acceptability of a new policy by citizens. If the urban computing output indicates the acceptability of the policy, the government can go ahead to implement the policy. If it shows a lack of awareness of the new policy, decision-makers can make tremendous efforts in creating awareness about the new policy. In case of rejection of the policy by citizens, additional work can be conducted based on urban computing to gain insight into the likely reasons for rejection of the new policy for future improvement or modification of the policy in order to better serve the citizens in the smart city. City governments gather data through various collection strategies, such as smart sensing, crowd sensing, crowdsourcing, opportunistic sensing, and unobtrusive continuous sensing. This massive big data collection facilitates the implementation of city-wide day-to-day operational intelligence to improve citizens’ lifestyles, city operations, and city environments [12]. In addition, real-time analytics help city governments control crime, respond to emergencies, and handle chaotic situations, such as riots, massive traffic jams, and viral diseases.
- Urban computing for business processes in smart cities: The services provided by a smart city to citizens through various city systems are facilitated via urban computing. Hence, the objectives of urban computing should be aligned with the business processes across city systems, and the primary prerequisite for city system integration for smart city development (SCD) is business process change (BPC). The best practices for enterprise systems integration (ESI) have been recognised and implemented since the 1940s. Javidroozi et al. [158] focused on understanding the similarities between SCD and ESI. The study provided a comparison framework highlighting that ESI could be utilised to address BPC challenges in an SCD context. The proposed framework will help researchers to focus on the social and technical aspects of city system integration.
6. Open Research Challenges
6.1. Cognitive Cybersecurity
6.2. Air Quality
6.3. IoT Resources
6.4. Cyber-Physical System
6.5. Data Sparsity Problem
6.6. Data Movement
6.7. (5G) Technologies
6.8. Scaling via the Analysis and Harvesting of Energy
6.9. Knowledge versus Privacy
6.10. Intersection of Smart and Sustainable City
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Koliopoulos, T.; Kouloumbis, P. Urban Computing and Smart Cities: Web Utilities Characteristics that Support Sustainable Smart Cities. In Resilient and Responsible Smart Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 115–124. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y. Unified Urban Governance Models. J. Wuhan Univ. Inf. Sci. Ed. 2022, 47, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, X.N.; Zhao, J.; Guo, P. The urban computing on the distribution of inhalable particulate matters to Smart City–based residential groups. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2019, 31, e4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E. Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: Urban computing and intelligence for strategic, short-term, and joined-up planning. Comput. Urban Sci. 2021, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, B.N.; Khan, M.; Han, K. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouroche, M.; Dusparic, I. Urban computing: The technological framework for smart cities. In Handbook of Smart Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 89–112. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, B.; Fan, C.; Fu, H.; Huang, J.; Chen, H.; Luo, X. Measuring and Computing Cognitive Statuses of construction Workers based on Electroencephalogram: A critical review. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2022, 9, 1644–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira Cavalcanti, C.; Limont, M.; Dziedzic, M.; Fernandes, V. Sustainability assessment methodology of urban mobility projects. Land Use Policy 2017, 60, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 31, 183–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, X.; Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; Lv, Y.; Sarker, M.N.I. Urban resilience for urban sustainability: Concepts, dimensions, and perspectives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, S.; Kar, A.K.; Gupta, M.P. Success of IoT in smart cities of India: An empirical analysis. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Capra, L.; Wolfson, O.; Yang, H. Urban computing: Concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2014, 5, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashef, M.; Visvizi, A.; Troisi, O. Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 124, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hefnawy, A.; Bouras, A.; Cherifi, C. Iot for smart city services: Lifecycle approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing, Dalian, China, 22–23 October 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Li, T.; Xie, P.; Du, S.; Teng, F.; Yang, X. Urban big data fusion based on deep learning: An overview. Inf. Fusion 2020, 53, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, M.; Atif, M.; Mujahid, H.; Shanableh, T.; Al-Ali, A.R.; Al Nabulsi, A. IoT based smart city bus stops. Future Internet 2019, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sangaiah, A.K.; Dhanaraj, J.S.A.; Mohandas, P.; Castiglione, A. Cognitive IoT system with intelligence techniques in sustainable computing environment. Comput. Commun. 2020, 154, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, M.; Luthra, S.; Mangla, S.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Challenges for adopting and implementing IoT in smart cities. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 1589–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Turjman, F. 5G-enabled devices and smart-spaces in social-IoT: An overview. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 92, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amanullah, M.A.; Habeeb, R.A.A.; Nasaruddin, F.H.; Gani, A.; Ahmed, E.; Nainar, A.S.M.; Akim, N.M.; Imran, M. Deep learning and big data technologies for IoT security. Comput. Commun. 2020, 151, 495–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Dai, H.N.; Wang, Q.; Shukla, M.K.; Imran, M. Unmanned aerial vehicle for internet of everything: Opportunities and challenges. Comput. Commun. 2020, 155, 66–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, X. DeepSense: A novel learning mechanism for traffic prediction with taxi GPS traces. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Sydney, Australia, 10–14 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Assem, H.; Ghariba, S.; Makrai, G.; Johnston, P.; Gill, L.; Pilla, F. Urban water flow and water level prediction based on deep learning. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2017, Skopje, Macedonia, 18–22 September 2017; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee, P.S.; Mandal, S.N.; De, D.; Maiti, B. RL-sleep: Temperature adaptive sleep scheduling using reinforcement learning for sustainable connectivity in wireless sensor networks. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2020, 26, 100380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafabadi, M.M.; Villanustre, F.; Khoshgoftaar, T.M.; Seliya, N.; Wald, R.; Muharemagic, E. Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics. J. Big Data 2015, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, Y.; Le, B.D.; Zia, T.; Gauravaram, P. Privacy Concerns Raised by Pervasive User Data Collection from Cyberspace and Their Countermeasures. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.04313. [Google Scholar]
- Usman, A.B.; Gutierrez, J. Toward trust based protocols in a pervasive and mobile computing environment: A survey. Ad Hoc Netw. 2018, 81, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaheed, S.M.; Abbas, J.; Shabbir, A.; Khalid, F. Solving the Challenges of Pervasive Computing. J. Comput. Commun. 2015, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Courant, M.; Lüthi, A. Pervasive Computing and Sustainable Development: A case study in Mobility Management. Update 2004, 2, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Bogomolov, A.; Lepri, B.; Ferron, M.; Pianesi, F.; Pentland, A.S. Pervasive stress recognition for sustainable living. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), Budapest, Hungary, 24–28 March 2014; pp. 345–350. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, M.; Yan, B.; Huang, Y.; Sarker, M.N.I. Big Data-Driven Urban Management: Potential for Urban Sustainability. Land 2011, 11, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honarvar, A.R.; Sami, A. Multi-source dataset for urban computing in a Smart City. Data Brief 2019, 22, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhirani, L.L.; Newe, T.; Nizamani, S. Hybrid Multi-Cloud Demystifying SLAs for Smart City Enterprises Using IoT Applications. In IoT Architectures, Models, and Platforms for Smart City Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 52–67. [Google Scholar]
- Kakderi, C.; Komninos, N.; Tsarchopoulos, P. Smart cities and cloud computing: Lessons from the STORM CLOUDS experiment. J. Smart Cities 2019, 1, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yaqoob, I.; Khan, L.U.; Kazmi, S.A.; Imran, M.; Guizani, N.; Hong, C.S. Autonomous Driving Cars in Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Requirements, and Challenges. IEEE Netw. 2019, 34, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, M.; Zhang, Z. A cyber-physical system framework towards smart city and urban computing to aid people with disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 27th Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC), Hualien, Taiwan, 30 April–1 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, S.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, W.; Wu, J.; Dai, H.N.; Imran, M. Blockchain for cloud exchange: A survey. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2020, 81, 106526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 2018, 14, 352–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahram, T.; Sargolzaei, A.; Sargolzaei, S.; Daniels, J.; Amaba, B. Blockchain technology innovations. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 8–10 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Krishna, G.J.; Ravi, V.; Reddy, B.V.; Zaheeruddin, M. Smart Blockchain: A Formidable Combination of Analytics and Blockchain–A Survey. In Smart Systems Design, Applications, and Challenges; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 43–62. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, M.A.; Rashid, M.M.; Hossain, M.S.; Hassanain, E.; Alhamid, M.F.; Guizani, M. Blockchain and IoT-based cognitive edge framework for sharing economy services in a smart city. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 18611–18621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peck, M.E. Blockchains: How they work and why they’ll change the world. IEEE Spectr. 2017, 54, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angraal, S.; Krumholz, H.M.; Schulz, W.L. Blockchain technology: Applications in health care. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2017, 10, e003800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, T.; Gomes, A. Blockchain voting and its effects on election transparency and voter confidence. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Staten Island, NY, USA, 7–9 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Aggarwal, S.; Chaudhary, R.; Aujla, G.S.; Kumar, N.; Choo, K.K.R.; Zomaya, A.Y. Blockchain for smart communities: Applications, challenges and opportunities. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2019, 144, 13–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeoh, P. Regulatory issues in blockchain technology. J. Financ. Regul. Compliance 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habibzadeh, H.; Nussbaum, B.H.; Anjomshoa, F.; Kantarci, B.; Soyata, T. A survey on cybersecurity, data privacy, and policy issues in cyber-physical system deployments in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, D.; Hannon, C.; Li, Z.; Cortes, P.; Ramaraju, S.; Burgess, P.; Buch, N.; Shahidehpour, M. Smart street lighting system: A platform for innovative smart city applications and a new frontier for cyber-security. Electr. J. 2016, 29, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitunskaite, M.; He, Y.; Brandstetter, T.; Janicke, H. Smart cities and cyber security: Are we there yet? A comparative study on the role of standards, third party risk management and security ownership. Comput. Secur. 2019, 83, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- D’Onofrio, S.; Portmann, E. Cognitive computing in smart cities. Inform. Spektrum 2017, 40, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, M.; Herrera, F.; Hwang, K. Cognitive computing: Architecture, technologies and intelligent applications. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 19774–19783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honarvar, A.R.; Sami, A. Towards sustainable smart city by particulate matter prediction using urban big data, excluding expensive air pollution infrastructures. Big Data Res. 2019, 17, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moglia, M.; Cork, S.J.; Boschetti, F.; Cook, S.; Bohensky, E.; Muster, T.; Page, D. Urban transformation stories for the 21st century: Insights from strategic conversations. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 50, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mydlarz, C.; Salamon, J.; Bello, J.P. The implementation of low-cost urban acoustic monitoring devices. Appl. Acoust. 2017, 117, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Valls, F.; Redondo, E.; Fonseca, D.; Torres-Kompen, R.; Villagrasa, S.; Martí, N. Urban data and urban design: A data mining approach to architecture education. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galbrun, E.; Pelechrinis, K.; Terzi, E. Urban navigation beyond shortest route: The case of safe paths. Inf. Syst. 2016, 57, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliveira, J. Big Social Data and Urban Computing; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cicirelli, F.; Guerrieri, A.; Mastroianni, C.; Spezzano, G.; Vinci, A. The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Salim, F.; Haque, U. Urban computing in the wild: A survey on large scale participation and citizen engagement with ubiquitous computing, cyber physical systems, and Internet of Things. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015, 81, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krieg, J.-G.; Jakllari, G.; Toma, H.; Beylot, A.L. Unlocking the smartphone’s sensors for smart city parking. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2018, 43, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Low, R.; Tekler, Z.D.; Cheah, L. An End-to-End Point of Interest (POI) Conflation Framework. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, J. ELM meets urban computing: Ensemble urban data for smart city application. In Proceedings of ELM-2015 Volume 1: Theory, Algorithms and Applications (I); Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 51–63. [Google Scholar]
- Tekler, Z.D.; Low, R.; Yuen, C.; Blessing, L. Plug-Mate: An IoT-based occupancy-driven plug load management system in smart buildings. Build. Environ. 2022, 223, 109472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Zeng, Q.; Cheng, Z. Quasi-holography computational model for urban computing. Vis. Inform. 2019, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Fu, Q.; Li, G.; Luo, B.; Chen, D.; Yu, H. Improvement of maximum variance weight partitioning particle filter in urban computing and intelligence. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 106527–106535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, A.W.; Mahmood, I.; Ahmed, N.; Anwar, Z. Big data in motion: A vehicle-assisted urban computing framework for smart cities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 55951–55965. [Google Scholar]
- Mora, H.; Peral, J.; Ferrandez, A.; Gil, D.; Szymanski, J. Distributed Architectures for Intensive Urban Computing: A Case Study on Smart Lighting for Sustainable Cities. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 58449–58465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meneguette, R.I.; Boukerche, A. Vehicular Clouds Leveraging Mobile Urban Computing Through Resource Discovery. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 21, 2640–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lah, O.; Fulton, L.; Arioli, M. Decarbonisation scenarios for transport and the role of urban mobility. In Sustainable Urban Mobility Pathways; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 65–80. [Google Scholar]
- da Cruz, S.M.S.; Costa, R.J.M. Enabling Smart City Provenance-Based Applications to Improve Urban Mobility in Brazilian Cities. In Sustainable Transportation and Smart Logistics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 439–466. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-Ares, A.; Mora, A.M.; Arenas, M.G.; García-Sánchez, P.; Romero, G.; Rivas, V.; Castillo, P.A.; Merelo, J.J. Studying real traffic and mobility scenarios for a Smart City using a new monitoring and tracking system. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2017, 76, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, M.; Vaidya, A.; Deshmukh, M. Sustainable transport solutions for the concept of smart city. Sustain. Energy Transp. Technol. Policy 2018, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Liu, C.; Wen, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.J. Understanding commuting patterns using transit smart card data. J. Transp. Geogr. 2017, 58, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canitez, F. Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective. Transp. Policy 2020, 90, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rad, T.G.; Sadeghi-Niaraki, A.; Abbasi, A.; Choi, S.M. A methodological framework for assessment of ubiquitous cities using ANP and DEMATEL methods. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 608–618. [Google Scholar]
- Balduini, M.; Brambilla, M.; Della Valle, E.; Marazzi, C.; Arabghalizi, T.; Rahdari, B.; Vescovi, M. Models and practices in urban data science at scale. Big Data Res. 2019, 17, 66–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Souza, T.I.; Aquino, A.L.; Gomes, D.G. A method to detect data outliers from smart urban spaces via tensor analysis. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 92, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaba, F.A.; Othman, M.; Hashem, I.A.T.; Alotaibi, F. Internet of Things security: A survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2017, 88, 10–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, Z.; Cao, S.; Liu, X.; Ma, Z.; Ma, J.; Deng, R.H. PrivacySignal: Privacy-Preserving Traffic Signal Control for Intelligent Transportation System. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 16290–16303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, F.Y.; Wang, K.; Lin, W.H.; Xu, X.; Chen, C. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2011, 12, 1624–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.R.; Reaz, M.B.I.; Ali, M.A.M. A review of smart homes—Past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 2012, 42, 1190–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredericks, E.M.; Bowers, K.M.; Price, K.A.; Hariri, R.H. CAL: A Smart Home Environment for Monitoring Cognitive Decline. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Vienna, Austria, 2–5 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, W.M.; Zualkernan, I.A. SensePods: A ZigBee-Based Tangible Smart Home Interface. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2018, 64, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Luo, J.; Luo, J.; Li, X.; Han, K.; Li, D.; Cao, X.; Wang, Z.L. Flexible Wood-Based Triboelectric Self-Powered Smart Home System. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 3341–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vegni, A.M.; Biagi, M.; Cusani, R. Smart vehicles, technologies and main applications in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Vehicular Technologies-Deployment and Applications; BoD—Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2013; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
- Omheni, N.; Bouabidi, I.; Gharsallah, A.; Zarai, F.; Obaidat, M.S. Smart mobility management in 5G heterogeneous networks. Iet Netw. 2017, 7, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragičević, T.; Siano, P.; Prabaharan, S.S. Future generation 5G wireless networks for smart grid: A comprehensive review. Energies 2019, 12, 2140. [Google Scholar]
- Mo, Y.; Kim, T.H.J.; Brancik, K.; Dickinson, D.; Lee, H.; Perrig, A.; Sinopoli, B. Cyber–physical security of a smart grid infrastructure. Proc. IEEE 2011, 100, 195–209. [Google Scholar]
- Mallett, A.; Jegen, M.; Philion, X.D.; Reiber, R.; Rosenbloom, D. Smart grid framing through coverage in the Canadian media: Technologies coupled with experiences. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1952–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, L.; Gui-rong, W.; Jian-ping, W.; Peiyong, D. Monitoring platform of energy management system for smart community. In Proceedings of the 2017 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Chongqing, China, 28–30 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kulkarni, P.; Farnham, T. Smart city wireless connectivity considerations and cost analysis: Lessons learnt from smart water case studies. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuel, O.; Javaid, N.; Almogren, A.; Javed, M.U.; Qasim, U.; Radwan, A. A Secure Energy Trading System for Electric Vehicles in Smart Communities using Blockchain. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 79, 103678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Abbas, S.; Hasan, Z.; Fatima, A. Intelligent transportation system (ITS) for smart-cities using Mamdani fuzzy inference system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Menouar, H.; Guvenc, I.; Akkaya, K.; Uluagac, A.S.; Kadri, A.; Tuncer, A. UAV-enabled intelligent transportation systems for the smart city: Applications and challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, I.-C.; Lin, C.Y.; Hung, H.M.; Cui, Q.; Chen, K.C. Autonomous vehicle as an intelligent transportation service in a smart city. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Toronto, ON, Canada, 24–27 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, S.W.; Uludag, S. Toward Smart Cities via the Smart Grid and Intelligent Transportation Systems. In Smart Grid; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 117–166. [Google Scholar]
- Naghibi, B.; Masoum, M.A.; Deilami, S. Effects of v2h integration on optimal sizing of renewable resources in smart home based on monte carlo simulations. IEEE Power Energy Technol. Syst. J. 2018, 5, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahsan, U.; Bais, A. Distributed smart home architecture for data handling in smart grid. Can. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2018, 41, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, Z.A. Using energy-efficient trust management to protect IoT networks for smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tekler, Z.D.; Ono, E.; Peng, Y.; Zhan, S.; Lasternas, B.; Chong, A. ROBOD, room-level occupancy and building operation dataset. In Building Simulation; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2022; Volume 15, pp. 2127–2137. [Google Scholar]
- Dallel, O.; Ayed, S.B.; Taher, J.B.H. Secure iot-based emergency management system for smart buildings. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Nanjing, China, 29 March–1 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, J.; Winstead, C.; Nutaro, J.; Kuruganti, T. Occupancy-based HVAC control with short-term occupancy prediction algorithms for energy-efficient buildings. Energies 2018, 11, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abdelhamid, S.; Hassanein, H.S.; Takahara, G. Reputation-aware, trajectory-based recruitment of smart vehicles for public sensing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2017, 19, 1387–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloqaily, M.; Al Ridhawi, I.; Kantraci, B.; Mouftah, H.T. Vehicle as a resource for continuous service availability in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–13 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Liu, J.; Cheng, L.; Qiu, S.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z. CreditCoin: A privacy-preserving blockchain-based incentive announcement network for communications of smart vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 2204–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garg, S.; Singh, A.; Batra, S.; Kumar, N.; Yang, L.T. UAV-empowered edge computing environment for cyber-threat detection in smart vehicles. IEEE Netw. 2018, 32, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fantin Irudaya Raj, E.; Appadurai, M. Internet of things-based smart transportation system for smart cities. In Intelligent Systems for Social Good: Theory and Practice; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 39–50. [Google Scholar]
- Naseer, S.; Liu, W.; Sarkar, N.I. Energy-efficient massive data dissemination through vehicle mobility in smart cities. Sensors 2019, 19, 4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ray, A.K.; Bagwari, A. Study of smart home communication protocol’s and security & privacy aspects. In Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), Nagpur, India, 11–13 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- de Oliveira Neto, J.S.; Silva, A.L.M.; Nakano, F.; Pérez-Álcazar, J.J.; Kofuji, S.T. When Wearable Computing Meets Smart Cities: Assistive Technology Empowering Persons with Disabilities. In Smart Cities and Smart Spaces: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1356–1376. [Google Scholar]
- Zenkert, J.; Dornhofer, M.; Weber, C.; Ngoukam, C.; Fathi, M. Big data analytics in smart mobility: Modeling and analysis of the Aarhus smart city dataset. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 15–18 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Soriano, F.R.; Samper-Zapater, J.J.; Martinez-Dura, J.J.; Cirilo-Gimeno, R.V.; Plume, J.M. Smart mobility trends: Open data and other tools. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2018, 10, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Amin, M.B.; Hussain, S.; Kang, B.H.; Cheong, T.; Lee, S. Health Fog: A novel framework for health and wellness applications. J. Supercomput. 2016, 72, 3677–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagani, G.A.; Aiello, M. From the grid to the smart grid, topologically. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2016, 449, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elzein, N.M.; Majid, M.A.; Hashem, I.A.T.; Yaqoob, I.; Alaba, F.A.; Imran, M. Managing big RDF data in clouds: Challenges, opportunities, and solutions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kansara, K.; Zaveri, V.; Shah, S.; Delwadkar, S.; Jani, K. Sensor based automated irrigation system with IOT: A technical review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2015, 6, 5331–5333. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, R.; Mahmood, A.; Razzaq, S.; Ali, W.; Naeem, U.; Shehzad, K. Prosumer based energy management and sharing in smart grid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualising smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, ACM, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Milanés-Montero, M.I.; Barrero-González, F.; Pando-Acedo, J.; González-Romera, E.; Romero-Cadaval, E.; Moreno-Munoz, A. Smart Community Electric Energy Micro-Storage Systems with Active Functions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 1975–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anwar, R.W.; Ali, S. Smart Cities Security Threat Landscape: A Review. Comput. Inform. 2022, 41, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerrudo, C.; Hasbini, A.; Russell, B. Cyber Security Guidelines for Smart City Technology Adoption; Cloud Security Alliance: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Heo, G.; Chae, K.; Doh, I. Hierarchical Blockchain-Based Group and Group Key Management Scheme Exploiting Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Urban Computing. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 27990–28003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jansen, W.A.; Grance, T. Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing; Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Bak, M.A. Computing fairness: Ethics of modeling and simulation in public health. Simulation 2022, 98, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, K.; Alhamadani, A.; Ji, T.; Lu, C.T. Batman or the joker? the powerful urban computing and its ethics issues. Sigspatial Spec. 2019, 11, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohge, M.; Trappe, W. An authentication framework for hierarchical ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Wireless Security, San Diego, CA, USA, 19 September 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, S.; Setia, S.; Jajodia, S. LEAP+: Efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. (TOSN) 2006, 2, 500–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Tryfonas, T.; Li, H. The Internet of Things: A security point of view. Internet Res. 2016, 26, 337–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jing, Q.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Wan, J.; Lu, J.; Qiu, D. Security of the Internet of Things: Perspectives and challenges. Wirel. Netw. 2014, 20, 2481–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frizzo-Barker, J.; Chow-White, P.A.; Mozafari, M.; Ha, D. An empirical study of the rise of big data in business scholarship. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yinbiao, S.; Lee, K.; Lanctot, P.; Jianbin, F.; Hao, H.; Chow, B.; Desbenoit, J.P. Internet of Things: Wireless Sensor Networks. White Paper, International Electrotechnical Commission. Available online: https://www.iec.ch.2014:11 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
- Anjum, A.; Ahmed, T.; Khan, A.; Ahmad, N.; Ahmad, M.; Asif, M.; Reddy, A.G.; Saba, T.; Farooq, N. Privacy preserving data by conceptualising smart cities using MIDR-Angelization. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 40, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anjum, A.; Choo, K.K.R.; Khan, A.; Haroon, A.; Khan, S.; Khan, S.U.; Ahmad, N.; Raza, B. An efficient privacy mechanism for electronic health records. Comput. Secur. 2018, 72, 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.H.; Obaidat, M.S.; Vijayakumar, P.; Abdulhay, E.; Li, F.; Reddy, M.K.C. A robust and efficient password-based conditional privacy preserving authentication and group-key agreement protocol for VANETs. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 84, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchin, R. The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20160115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Baldini, G.; Botterman, M.; Neisse, R.; Tallacchini, M. Ethical design in the internet of things. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2018, 24, 905–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mittelstadt, B. Ethics of the health-related internet of things: A narrative review. Ethics Inf. Technol. 2017, 19, 157–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gandia, R. City Outlines Travel Diary Plan to Determine Future Transportation Needs. Calgary Sun. 2012. Available online: https://calgarysun.com/2012/01/11/city-outlines-travel-diary-plan-to-determine-future%02transportation-needs (accessed on 20 May 2021).
- Jiang, S.; Fiore, G.A.; Yang, Y.; Ferreira, J., Jr.; Frazzoli, E.; González, M.C. A review of urban computing for mobile phone traces: Current methods, challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing, Chicago, IL, USA, 11 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, J.; Zheng, Y.; Xie, X. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Beijing China, 12–16 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sheng, C.; Zheng, Y.; Hsu, W.; Lee, M.L.; Xie, X. Answering top-k similar region queries. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications: 15th International Conference, DASFAA 2010, Tsukuba, Japan, 1–4 April 2010; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y.; Liu, F.; Hsieh, H.P. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Chicago, IL, USA, 11–14 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Becker, R.A.; Caceres, R.; Hanson, K.; Loh, J.M.; Urbanek, S.; Varshavsky, A.; Volinsky, C. A tale of one city: Using cellular network data for urban planning. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2011, 10, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demissie, M.G.; de Almeida Correia, G.H.; Bento, C. Exploring cellular network handover information for urban mobility analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 2013, 31, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabrese, F.; Diao, M.; Di Lorenzo, G.; Ferreira, J., Jr.; Ratti, C. Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2013, 26, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y. Methods for sensing urban noises. Tec. Rep. MSR-TR-2014-66 2014. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/methods-for-sensing-urban-noises/ (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Ross, Z.; Kheirbek, I.; Clougherty, J.E.; Ito, K.; Matte, T.; Markowitz, S.; Eisl, H. Noise, air pollutants and traffic: Continuous measurement and correlation at a high-traffic location in New York City. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 1054–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, T. A noise map of New York City. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, Seattle, WA, USA, 13–17 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Martí, I.G.; Rodríguez, L.E.; Benedito, M.; Trilles, S.; Beltrán, A.; Díaz, L.; Huerta, J. Mobile application for noise pollution monitoring through gamification techniques. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Santini, S.; Ostermaier, B.; Vitaletti, A. First experiences using wireless sensor networks for noise pollution monitoring. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks, New York, NY, USA, 1 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Weng, J.; Imran, M. An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 105, 475–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, F.; Wilkie, D.; Zheng, Y.; Xie, X. Sensing the pulse of urban refueling behavior. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Zurich, Switzerland, 8–12 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Shang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Tong, W.; Chang, E.; Yu, Y. Inferring gas consumption and pollution emission of vehicles throughout a city. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 24–27 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Dusparic, I.; Harris, C.; Marinescu, A.; Cahill, V.; Clarke, S.l. Multi-agent residential demand response based on load forecasting. In Proceedings of the 2013 1st IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Portland, Oregon, 1–2 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Momtazpour, M.; Butler, P.; Ramakrishnan, N.; Hossain, M.S.; Bozchalui, M.C.; Sharma, R. Charging and storage infrastructure design for electric vehicles. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2014, 5, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malandra, F.; Chiquette, L.O.; Lafontaine-Bédard, L.P.; Sansò, B. Traffic characterisation and LTE performance analysis for M2M communications in smart cities. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2018, 48, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javidroozi, V.; Shah, H.; Feldman, G. Urban Computing and Smart Cities: Towards Changing City Processes by Applying Enterprise Systems Integration Practices. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 108023–108034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, G.T.H.; Shimadera, H.; Uranishi, K.; Matsuo, T.; Kondo, A. Numerical assessment of PM2.5 and O3 air quality in Continental Southeast Asia: Impacts of potential future climate change. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 215, 116901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payus, C.M.; Syazni, M.N.; Sentian, J. Extended air pollution index (API) as tool of sustainable indicator in the air quality assessment: El-Nino events with climate change driven. Heliyon 2011, 8, e09157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usmani, R.S.A.; Pillai, T.R.; Hashem, I.A.T.; Marjani, M.; Shaharudin, R.B.; Latif, M.T. Artificial intelligence techniques for predicting cardiorespiratory mortality caused by air pollution. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Guo, J.E.; Sun, S.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C. Air quality forecasting with artificial intelligence techniques: A scientometric and content analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 2022, 149, 105329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.L.; Batterman, S. Residence location as a measure of environmental exposure: A review of air pollution epidemiology studies. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2000, 10, 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pinder, R.W.; Klopp, J.M.; Kleiman, G.; Hagler, G.S.; Awe, Y.; Terry, S. Opportunities and challenges for filling the air quality data gap in low-and middle-income countries. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 215, 116794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Commane, R.; Schiferl, L.D. Climate mitigation policies for cities must consider air quality impacts. Chem 2022, 8, 910–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suarez-Bertoa, R.; Astorga, C. Unregulated emissions from light-duty hybrid electric vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 136, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.H.; Wu, C.H. Collecting and mining big data for electric vehicle systems using battery modeling data. In Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 13–15 April 2015; pp. 626–631. [Google Scholar]
- Galus, M.D.; Andersson, G. Demand management of grid connected plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 17–18 November 2008; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Pokorný, J.; Škoda, P.; Zelinka, I.; Bednárek, D.; Zavoral, F.; Kruliš, M.; Šaloun, P. Big data movement: A challenge in data processing. In Big Data in Complex Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 29–69. [Google Scholar]
- Salman, M.; Long, X.; Dauda, L.; Mensah, C.N. The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munjal, R.; Liu, W.; Li, X.J.; Gutierrez, J. A neural network-based sustainable data dissemination through public transportation for smart cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.O.; Ahad, M.A.; Alam, M.A.; Siddiqui, F.; Casalino, G. Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. Sensors 2021, 21, 7714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broo, D.G. Transdisciplinarity and three mindsets for sustainability in the age of cyber-physical systems. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 27, 100290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pundir, A.; Singh, S.; Kumar, M.; Bafila, A.; Saxena, G.J. Cyber-Physical Systems Enabled Transport Networks in Smart Cities: Challenges and Enabling Technologies of the New Mobility Era. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 16350–16364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagarajan, S.M.; Deverajan, G.G.; Bashir, A.K.; Mahapatra, R.P.; Al-Numay, M.S. IADF-CPS: Intelligent Anomaly Detection Framework towards Cyber Physical Systems. Comput. Commun. 2022, 188, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z.; Qu, H.; Yang, S.H.; Ding, Y.; Song, J. A survey of visual analytics in urban area. Expert Syst. 2022, 9, e13065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenland, S.; Mansournia, M.A.; Altman, D.G. Sparse data bias: A problem hiding in plain sight. BMJ 2016, 352, i1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kanwal, M.; Malik, A.W.; Rahman, A.U. Mahmood I, Shahzad M. Sustainable vehicle-assisted edge computing for big data migration in smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 7, 1857–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Zhai, Y.; Sezaki, K. 5G and Beyond Technology-Enabled Remote Health. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021, 28, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitello, P.; Capponi, A.; Fiandrino, C.; Cantelmo, G.; Kliazovich, D. Mobility-driven and energy-efficient deployment of edge data centers in urban environments. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Comput. 2021, 7, 736–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajjad, M.M.; Bernardos, C.J.; Jayalath, D.; Tian, Y.C. Inter-Slice Mobility Management in 5G: Motivations, Standard Principles, Challenges, and Research Directions. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2011, 6, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsamhi, S.H.; Shvetsov, A.V.; Kumar, S.; Hassan, J.; Alhartomi, M.A.; Shvetsova, S.V.; Sahal, R.; Hawbani, A. Computing in the Sky: A Survey on Intelligent Ubiquitous Computing for UAV-Assisted 6G Networks and Industry 4.0/5.0. Drones 2022, 6, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, D.J.; Das, S.K. Pervasive computing at scale: Transforming the state of the art. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2012, 8, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Costa, D.G.; Peixoto, J.P.J.; Jesus, T.C.; Portugal, P.; Vasques, F.; Rangel, E.; Peixoto, M. A Survey of Emergencies Management Systems in Smart Cities. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 61843–61872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2016, p. 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
- Streitz, N. Citizen-centred design for humane and sociable hybrid cities. In Proceedings of the Hybrid City 2015—Data to the People, Athens, Greece, 17–19 September 2015; pp. 17–20. [Google Scholar]
- Streitz, N. Smart cities need privacy by design for being humane. In What Urban Media Art Can Do–Why When Where and How; Avedition: Stuttgart, Germany, 2016; pp. 268–274. [Google Scholar]
- Streitz, N.; Charitos, D.; Kaptein, M.; Böhlen, M. Grand challenges for ambient intelligence and implications for design contexts and smart societies. J. Ambient. Intell. Smart Environ. 2019, 11, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Streitz, N. Beyond ‘smart-only’cities: Redefining the ‘smart-everything’ paradigm. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 791–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pira, M. A novel taxonomy of smart sustainable city indicators. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2021, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Research Area | Key Challenges |
---|---|
Deep learning |
|
Big data |
|
Pervasive and mobile intelligence |
|
Multi-cloud |
|
Cognitive computing |
|
Smart automation |
|
Blockchain |
|
Cyber security |
|
IoT |
|
Data Source | Content Format | Complexity | Analytical Tools | Application(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Social media | Unstructured and semi-structured | High |
|
|
Traffic event | Semi-structured | Medium |
| Predictive analytics |
Energy data | Semi-structured | Medium |
| Predictive analytics |
Geographical data | Unstructured | High |
| Temporal analytics |
Sensor data | Unstructured | High |
|
|
Government data | Structured and unstructured | Medium |
| Urban planning |
Smart City Component | Urban Data | Communication Technologies | Solution(s) | Limitation(s) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intelligent transportation |
| Wi-Fi and ZigBee |
|
| [79,80,81] |
Smart home | Sensor data | Wi-Fi |
|
| [82,83,84,85] |
Smart vehicles | Sensor data | WiMAX and Bluetooth | Optimising flow of vehicles, reducing the frequency of traffic jams and accidents |
| [86] |
Smart mobility | Sensor data | Bluetooth and 5G mobile devices |
|
| [87] |
Smart grid | Sensor data | WiMAX and ZigBee |
|
| [88,89,90] |
Smart communities | User data Sensor data | Wi-Fi | Improve nation’s income in the following areas: economic diversity and growth, energy efficiency and climate change mitigation, efficient transportation and mobility, and community resilience and safety | Scalability | [91,92,93] |
Implications | Guidelines |
---|---|
Security [121,122]. |
|
Privacy [123,124]. |
|
Ethics [125,126]. |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hashem, I.A.T.; Usmani, R.S.A.; Almutairi, M.S.; Ibrahim, A.O.; Zakari, A.; Alotaibi, F.; Alhashmi, S.M.; Chiroma, H. Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053916
Hashem IAT, Usmani RSA, Almutairi MS, Ibrahim AO, Zakari A, Alotaibi F, Alhashmi SM, Chiroma H. Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053916
Chicago/Turabian StyleHashem, Ibrahim Abaker Targio, Raja Sher Afgun Usmani, Mubarak S. Almutairi, Ashraf Osman Ibrahim, Abubakar Zakari, Faiz Alotaibi, Saadat Mehmood Alhashmi, and Haruna Chiroma. 2023. "Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053916
APA StyleHashem, I. A. T., Usmani, R. S. A., Almutairi, M. S., Ibrahim, A. O., Zakari, A., Alotaibi, F., Alhashmi, S. M., & Chiroma, H. (2023). Urban Computing for Sustainable Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Research Challenges. Sustainability, 15(5), 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053916