Next Article in Journal
Effect Evaluation of Large-Scale Energy Saving Renovation of Rural Buildings in Beijing and Implications for Other Cities in the Same Zone
Previous Article in Journal
The Power Transition under the Interaction of Different Systems—A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Are Customers Always Right? The Importance of Sincerity and Keenness in Creating Retail Sustainable Development

Graduate Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City 40227, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5579; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065579
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023

Abstract

:
In recent years, sustainability has become one of the essential elements of corporate management. There are many ways retailers can influence and develop a sustainable environment. The Taiwanese retail sector accounts for 10% of GDP. The capital city Taipei has the world’s highest department store density (per capita). This study encapsulates retail expertise to generate ten dimensions from 46 retail service quality scale indicators: SNAKE ROSES. The study first adopts qualitative analysis by conducting semi-structured interviews with five experts in the industry. Fifteen Delphi technique experts were then consulted for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of the indicators. Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the most important aspects of customer service were ranked. The study shows that service quality dimensions are Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store Policy. Sincerity and Keenness are the most crucial globally. Although numerous researchers have examined the broader topic of perceived service quality, studies have yet to explore the critical role of Eastern culture, and therefore this study introduces an innovative framework. Implications include a conceptual framework for the key factors influencing customer satisfaction, one of the most critical dimensions of perceived service quality and customer satisfaction in the Taiwanese retail industry. A specification for retailers is delivered, intending to improve their sustainability strategies.

1. Introduction

The cultural differences between East and West affect how customers respond to the customer services provided [1]. To gain a competitive advantage in the market, retailers must provide a style of service that caters to customers [2]. Sustainability can be an essential source of competitive advantage for the retail sector [3]. Online Merge Offline (OMO) is a new retail marketing concept that combines the benefits of both online sales and physical stores [4]. There is a strong focus on moving towards this business model in Asia. However, as there is no direct interaction between customers and retailers in the online shopping model, brick-and-mortar retail remains the dominant retail move in Asia [5].
Taiwan ranks first in Asia in terms of financial assets per capita, according to the Allianz Global Wealth Report 2022 [6]. Its capital, Taipei, has the highest density of department stores in the world (88,000 people per store), making the Taiwanese retail industry a fertile ground for the study of brand development and various services. In 2021, there were ten department stores in Taiwan with a revenue of over $10 billion NTD. Therefore, a thriving face-to-face retail sector still emphasizes physical interaction between frontline salespersons and customers [7].
There is no better demonstration of the Chinese aphorism, “the river can sail a boat, but it can also sink it”. Product differentiation is inextricably linked to the service attitudes provided by the frontline salesperson [8,9,10]. Previously, sales training has been needed to pay more attention to the perceived attitudes of salespeople [11]. Attitude is one of the main determinants of purchase intention [12]. More and more organizations are integrating sustainability into their businesses to gain a competitive advantage [13,14]. Therefore, we have developed a new strategic framework and recommendations for practice, investigating the attitudes of frontline salespeople, as defined by the ten service quality scales (SNAKE ROSES).
This study aims to address two significant research gaps: first, to develop a service innovation quality framework suitable for cultural retailing in the East; second, to validate the intangible service quality indicators of the OMO business environment and their importance in physical channels.
This study fills a service quality gap concerning the physical channel of OMO in the retail industry and provides a key for decision-making. Thus, we hypothesize that a service quality framework should be related to Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store Policy as ten dimensions. We analyze each indicator’s importance in strengthening retail training, and providing reinforcement via behavioral psychology [15] and behavior shaping [16].

1.1. Literature Review

Customer satisfaction is the top priority for most business ventures and is the interface bridging customers and the business [17,18]. Customer service is of particular interest to the retail industry [19]. Competition in the retail sector is growing increasingly fierce, because products often have significant similarities [20,21]. To this end, good customer service is often seen as winning competitive advantage [22]. The last few decades have seen rapid changes in the retail sector’s business model and marketing strategy, driven by online retailing: in 1984, the English Videotex started the first all-day shopping channel on television; in 1995, the Amazon online bookshop and eBay online stores heralded the age of the E-Commerce Platform. At the time, e-commerce retailing had a limited impact on traditional physical retailing. Nevertheless, a new business model was born [20,23,24].
COVID-19 accelerated digitization and changed business operations, but abnormal e-commerce trends may decline after the pandemic. People may revert to old buying habits, particularly for food and groceries [21]. Therefore, businesses need to adapt commercial models to keep up with changing customer behavior. Some international online retailers have complemented their online presence with physical stores, such as 7-ELEVEN’s acquisition of American Speed Way, Lotte Group’s heavy investment in the Japanese SEIYU supermarket, and PX Mart’s acquisition of RT-MART for $11.5 billion. This rediscovery of traditional physical stores’ value and potential is evident in Taiwan’s growing OMO development. This paper aims to identify the theoretical qualities of customer service in staff training, and highlights that standardization can strengthen responsibility and reduce the costs of sustainable retailing [3,25].

1.1.1. Frontline Salesperson

There is a wealth of research on the importance of the frontline salesperson to a retailer’s success [26,27,28,29]. Consumers are 60% more likely to accept new products as a direct result of the frontline salesperson [30]. When an organization invests in frontline salesperson training, it can improve staff knowledge, skills, and attitudes [1], along with staff knowledge, skills, and philosophy. Furthering better performance and customer service, the literature on employee education and training has proven the strategic relationship between exercise and organizational performance [1]. This movement also results in better customer service and satisfaction, reflecting sales figures. An attitude is a psychological disposition that can be taught and learned [12,13]. Both emotional and factual messaging should be used when promoting a product. Emotional appeals motivate purchases, while information that is true reduces perceived risk [31].

1.1.2. Online-Merge-Offline Service Features

Online-Merge-Offline is a new retail concept that means what it says: linking physical retail stores to an online shopping website. OMO combines a powerful online presence with the appeal of material shopping. Dr. Kai-Fu Lee proposed the OMO concept in September 2017 in China [32]. The OMO model is a business model that connects online e-commerce with offline physical stores, directs the passenger flow from the online platform to offline physical stores, and transforms the passenger flow of these offline physical stores via the dual advantages of online user operation [4]. The effective integration of online and offline channels is the new foundation for the modern retail industry. Many traditional retailers are catching up with this trend in order to meet current customers’ increasing complexities and needs [33,34,35]. Scholars [36] have found that, in cross-border e-commerce, eight factors (training, performance, user-friendliness, trust, usability, security, quality, and design) significantly affect e-service satisfaction. Improving these factors can enhance e-commerce performance and benefit physical stores.

1.1.3. The SNAKE ROSES Illusion

A ‘more live’ relationship in traditional commerce may mean better product customization, which is why improved customer service can lead to increased customer satisfaction [37].There are considerable cultural differences between the West and the East. These affect consumer behavior, experiences, customer attitudes, and satisfaction [1]. In the current literature, there is a deficit of research on Asian retail expertise. To investigate the impact on service quality of the various intangible service qualities in the context of OMO offline physical stores, the SNAKE ROSES indicators were constructed to measure the service quality and attitude of the frontline salesperson. An anagram was formed by the first letters of the ten dimensions: Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store policy. This is a framework for sustainable and measurable service indicators. It is expected that the frontline salesperson will behave like a “snake”, with a keen sense of perception and a self-transformation mentality, treating customers with care and passion as if they were “roses”, establishing a unique corporate culture for brand positioning and differentiation.

1.1.4. The Service Quality Model

In a competitive industry, consumer service quality is a critical success factor [1,38]. The quality of customer service can both be affected by tangible and intangible attributes [39]; these attributes make up the attitudes of the frontline salesperson. Improving the quality of customer service has a direct positive impact on customer loyalty and profitability. Therefore, accurate measurement of customer service quality is an essential concern for management [40].
The SERVQUAL scale [20] is the most widely used and respected. Focus Group Interviews analyzed the original 1985 PZB [41] model, the proposed service quality model. In 1988, the model was consolidated into five significant dimensions and 22 questions [20]. Most subsequent research scholars use the modified scale as their benchmark to improve service quality. The five major components are Assurance, Empathy, Tangibles, Responsiveness, and Reliability. SERVQUAL is a broad scale that applies to industries that provide goods and services. However, it has yet to be validated for use in other countries.
Since then, service quality-related issues have attracted various experts and scholars [10,42,43,44,45], but some have questioned the SERVQUAL scale and its suitability for the retail industry as a whole [46,47,48,49,50]. Subsequently, three scholars proposed the Retail Service Quality Scale (RSQS) [49]. RSQS uses qualitative research to determine the main factors that consumers use to evaluate service quality in the retail industry. This has proven useful in the experience of department stores, but still needs to capture the differences in Eastern cultures.
In 2009, James [50] conducted an in-depth case study investigating the differences in consumption patterns between Asian and Western cultures. Despite this, the study was only run by a single wholesaler, so its finding could only be extrapolated to some retail sectors. In [51], the SOR framework was used to understand the impact of live-streaming e-commerce on consumers’ real-time online shopping behavior. Organism factors, such as personal characteristics, psychological states, knowledge and emotions, can significantly affect consumers’ emotional and cognitive states, influencing their purchasing behavior. Balázs et al. [37] proposed an e-commerce supply chain management model that includes customer-oriented marketing strategies, alignment with supply chain partners, and real-time monitoring. These principles also apply to physical stores, helping businesses stay competitive.
SNAKE ROSES is based on expert opinions from across the Taiwanese retail industry in the context of offline sales, which may improve the guidance of customer interactions in a physical face-to-face retail service. Attitude is centered on knowledge about the evaluated entity and gradually accumulates specific detail; as such, it is a predictor of behavior. We can presume that attitudes are tendencies manifested in purchase options [24]. As mentioned above, it can be inferred that this study hypothesizes that the SNAKE ROSES service quality framework consists of the dimensions of Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store Policy. The framework is shown in Table 1.

1.1.5. The Knowledge Gap and Research Questions

Retailers must adopt a sustainable strategy to guide customers to become loyal [24] and create strong differentiations and a greater willingness to buy their products [66,67,68,69]. To this extent, in order to implement business strategies to create a competitive advantage, special attention must be paid to the benefits and consequences of a frontline salesperson’s service attitude and to customer loyalty. To this extent, to implement business strategies in order to create a competitive advantage, special attention must be paid to the antecedents and consequences of a frontline salesperson’s service attitude and customer loyalty. In addition, the other side of the gap will be presented differently in the current study by focusing on Eastern cultural influences that lead to service attitude indicators. This knowledge gap has led to the development of the main research question, as follows.
  • What service quality indicators illustrate the sustainability of the retail industry from the perspective of Eastern culture after the retail sector has entered the OMO marketing model? What is the importance of these indicators?
Answering this question will deliver more insights and create the capability of building a hypothesis for a critical study.

2. Materials and Methods

The study adopted both qualitative and quantitative approaches, qualitative research through expert interviews using Delphi techniques. Constructing innovative service indicators for the sustainable development of the retail industry, AHP was used to present the conclusion and analysis. After an extensive literature review, a semi-structured questionnaire was developed. Five industry experts first confirmed the validity of the questionnaire, each with more than 25 years of experience in the retail industry. A panel of 15 Delphi technique experts and scholars was then invited to form the Expert Panel to conduct three rounds of the Delphi Technique Expert Questionnaire, with the primary goal of constructing a SNAKE ROSES framework based on appropriateness and consistency. The weights of the 46 indicators were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
This study improves the validity of the questionnaire via industry experts, and the successive use of the Delphi Technique is used to improve the content quality of decision making by building consensus, through the expertise and experience of a group of experts, for the evaluation and planning of future policies [70,71]. This study invited a Delphi panel of 15 experts to conduct three rounds of questionnaires. The members preferably held different philosophies and social backgrounds [72]. Traditionally, small samples are used for Delphi technique membership. It is suggested that, if the Delphi technique expert group is less homogeneous, the number of members should be between five and ten [14]. When there are at least 10 members, the group’s errors are minimized and reliability is highest [70]. Therefore, five experts from the industry, five from nonprofit organizations, and five from academia were selected to form the AHP. The appropriateness (M, Mo) and consistency (SD, Q) of the constructed SNAKE ROSES framework using a Likert five-point scale and SPSS 20.0 software were examined, and AHP calculated the weights of the indicators.
Thomas developed the AHP in 1971, which was mainly applied to decision problems under uncertainty and with multiple evaluation criteria [73]. To assess the importance of each indicator, an AHP was conducted. A nine-point scale to compare the significance of each indicator was used, and the scale was divided into five factors: “Absolute Importance”, “Very Strong Importance”, “Essential Importance”, “Weak Importance”, and “Equal Importance”. Fifteen Delphi experts were invited to fill out the questionnaire, and Expert Choice software was selected for the analysis.
The expert respondent’s judgment must exclude subjectivity, which would result in the questionnaire failing to meet the consistency option. Therefore, the consistency index (CI) and consistency ratio (CR) were used to check the consistency of the pairwise comparison questionnaire, which can show the respondent’s judgment before and after the question [73].
The overall framework is categorized into: (1) Sincerity; (2) Neatness; (3) Attentiveness; (4) Keenness; (5) Empathy; (6) Reliability; (7) Optimism; (8) Steadfastness; (9) Expertise; and (10) Store Policy, with ten dimensions and 46 indicators to explore. Conducting a literature review can be summarized into three main phases: planning, conducting the review, and reporting the study [74]. The five stages of the research methodology in this paper are shown in Figure 1. Finally, expert opinions are rated and the SNAKE ROSES dimensions are weighted.
This study used a purposive sampling method to conduct the questionnaire. The process was completed in two stages, firstly with five industry experts and secondly with f15 Delphi technique experts. Responses were coded to ensure anonymity. The study was conducted over three months, from February to May 2022. In the industry expert interview part, five experts were contacted by phone or email to explain the purpose and use of this research. One-on-one interviews were conducted after obtaining the consent of the interviewees. Due to concerns about the pandemic virus (COVID-19), the three experts used communication software (Microsoft Teams version 1.6), and two experts communicated via email.
The results from the Delphi technique experts panel were published anonymously to avoid the influence of a few authoritative experts and to build consensus. Surveys by letter or email were repeated until 15 experts reached agreement. The study was completed in January 2023, and respondents were invited to request summaries of the results by contacting the authors.

3. Results

From the literature review, 49 indicators were compiled to capture the attributes of frontline retail services. Five industry experts were invited to assist in ensuring content validity, making corrections, or adding explanations. Upon discussion with experts, two were deleted, and ten were revised, leaving 47 final indicators in the analysis.
Concerning the 47 indicators revised by the industry experts, 15 experts in the Delphi Technique conducted a three-round survey. SPSS 20.0 was used to analyze the relevance and consistency of the data.
(1)
Selection criteria: Appropriateness: M ≥ 3.5 or Mo ≥ 3; Consistency: SD ≤ 1 or Q < 1.
(2)
Deletion criteria: Appropriateness: M < 3.5 or Mo < 3; Consistency: SD > 1 or Q ≥ 1.
First, we used the Delphi method to conduct qualitative analysis (with four indicator modifications); in the first round of quantitative analysis, we removed one question from the questionnaire due to duplication and amended the questions to 46 indicators. The statistical results for appropriateness and consistency were M = 3.93~5.00 ≥ 3.5, Mo = 4~5 ≥ 3, SD = 0.000~0.748 ≤ 1, and Q = 0.000~0.500 < 1.
The second round of Delphi Technique expert questionnaires was based on the analysis results of the First round of questionnaires, and the importance of the indicators was checked. The questionnaire is divided into two parts. The first part is based on the statistical analysis and correction results of the first round of questionnaires, a reference for experts to use in filling in the second round.
The second part consists of the new questionnaire for the Second round. Delphi Technique experts are asked to select the importance of the SNAKE ROSES indicators. The statistical results for suitability and consistency are M = 4.23~5.00 ≥ 3.5 (where M = 5 has three indicators: Sincerity in customer service, Proper time to swallow your pride, and respond to customer questions promptly). Mo = 4~5 ≥ 3 (Mo = 5, total 41 indicators), SD = 0.000~0.799 ≤ 1, Q = 0.000~0.500 < 1, Remarks = all are reserved. Furthermore, a consensus was reached for qualitative analysis (Second round). Appropriateness and consistency were also within the scope for selection.
The total mean of the mean is 4.64, which means that the concentration of agreement for the indicators is high and the importance of each indicator tends to be influential; the mean of the standard deviation is 0.461, which means that the dispersion of the opinions of the group members is small, indicating that the experts tend to agree on the questions; the more significant the mode, the higher the importance of the indicators, indicating that each indicator has reached the level of importance, as in Table 2.
Since the experts agreed on the second round of Delphi expert questionnaires without additional comments, a third round of expert questionnaires will not occur. The final questionnaire will be based on the second round of Delphi questionnaires. In this study, we again conducted a consistency check on the suitability of the questionnaire, i.e., we calculated the Dimensions Consistency Index (CI) and Consistency Ratio (CR). As indicators of the Consistency Ratio Hierarchy (CRH), as Thomas [73] suggested, the CI and CR must be less than 0.1 to be acceptable. Otherwise, the association of stratified factors would become problematic, and all elements and connections should be reanalyzed.
The results show that Dimensions’ CI = 0.01 < 0.1, CR = 0.02 < 0.1, and the experts agree on the ten Dimension indexes. Indicators CRH = 0.098 < 0.1, which means that the experts have improved consistency in filling out the 46 Indicators for SNAKE ROSES. Indicator Overall Average was M = 4.64, which means that the concentration of agreement is high and tends towards the necessary. SD = 0.461. This means that the dispersion of opinions in the group members is small, and their views on the issues tend to be consistent. The larger the Mo value, the higher the importance of the indicators. In this study, as many as 41 indicators have an Mo value of 5, which means that all indicators have reached the importance level. Thus, the SNAKE ROSES framework was established, as Table 3 shows.
To assess the relative importance of each SNAKE ROSES indicator, we used AHP, a nine-point scale, and Expert Choice software to find a weighted close relationship between the indicators. Fifteen project experts checked the relative importance of the questions for the two criteria and selected the importance scale.
The most critical Dimensions were Sincerity (0.232), followed by Keenness (0.151), Attentiveness (0.150), Store Policy (0.125), and the least important were Neatness (0.047) and Reliability (0.047). The most important indicators were sincerity in customer service (0.085) and responding to customer questions promptly (0.085), followed by Proper use of time, Swallow your pride (0.084) and Maintaining a happy mood at work (0.057). The least important are Market Sensitivity (0.005) and Do not push customers to buy (0.006), as shown in Table 4.

4. Discussion

Sustainability in retail is an emerging topic, along with knowing how to communicate retailers’ sustainability initiatives to different audiences [3]. Michael Porter said, “Do not do operationally competitive, do Differentiation Competitive” [75]. A differentiation strategy uses factors other than price to make customers feel different. Therefore, this study constructs an innovative retail service framework (SNAKE ROSES) to strengthen the service attitude of frontline salespeople and enhance corporate differentiation, in order to achieve the goals of sustainable business operation.
This study presents a practical methodology for validating a framework for service quality. Based on a thorough literature review, the study postulated ten dimensions of the service quality framework. Reliability analysis was conducted via industry expert interviews, and validity analysis using the Delphi method was employed to assess the hypothesis. After thorough data analysis and statistical testing, it was determined that the ten dimensions of the framework effectively explain service quality. Based on these findings, we conclude that the ten dimensions of the service quality framework, namely Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store Policy, are supported. This study provides empirical evidence that validates the research hypothesis.
In the past, sales training has rarely explicitly focused on the perceived attitudes of salespeople [11], and most scholars exploring retailing scales have not specifically emphasized service attitudes; most have adopted qualitative research methods (e.g., SERVQUAL [20,41], RSQS [49]). Some scholars have considered Eastern culture, but the research object has been a single outlet, which cannot show the whole picture of the retail industry (e.g., [50]). For consumers, in addition to the condition of the goods themselves, the quality of physical goods also includes intangible feelings about the service process [76]. In the micro-profit competition environment, high-quality service delivery is an essential strategy for the survival and competition of enterprises, and consumers’ judgment of service quality depends partly on the performance of service personnel [20,38,41,49]. So far, much of the literature still needs an innovation framework for retail, consistent with Eastern culture and intangible service quality. Therefore, this study is essential for the Eastern brick-and-mortar retail industry.
The purpose of this study is to propose Eastern Culture as an innovative framework related to customer value and sustainable business operations. The study consulted industry and Delphi technique experts to construct the SNAKE ROSES indicators. It used AHP to confirm the ranking of the indicators. According to the experts, the SNAKE ROSES framework dimensions index, in order of importance, consists of: Sincerity, Keenness, Attentiveness, Store Policy, Optimism, Empathy, Steadfastness, Expertise, and the least essential Reliability and Neatness indicators. The results showed that Sincerity and Keenness equally were the most critical dimensions. These findings expand the previous understanding in this field [41,61]. The top five indices of importance for 46 indicators are “Sincerity in customer service”, “Responding to customer questions promptly”, “Proper time up swallow your pride”, “Maintaining a happy mood at work”, and “See the advantages of customers at first glance.” Many service industries worldwide have embraced the concept of “the customer is always right” over many years. However, facing unreasonable customer demands can sometimes be difficult for frontline employees. This study found that “Sincerity in customer service” and “Responding to customer questions promptly” are more likely to win the hearts and minds of customers. The present study not only extends the research of past scholars but also enriches the expansion of research methodologies and contributes to the sustainable operation of the retail industry.

5. Conclusions

Use your heart rather than your mouth to convince people. To win customer satisfaction, you must move consumers with a sincere service attitude and behavior and make them feel the advantage of service quality [41]. This study selects the brick-and-mortar retail industry as the background, analyzes the factors affecting customer service quality, and initially uses interviews with industry experts to construct a framework for the SNAKE ROSES Service Quality Index. Using Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, Store Policy as yhe ten indicators, a measurable and consistent service quality rating index framework is constructed. Finally, the Analytic Hierarchy Process was used to comprehensively measure customer service quality in the retail industry. The SNAKE ROSES service indicator framework is expected to achieve sustainable business operations, especially for the Eastern retail industry.

5.1. Theoretical Contributions

With the expansion of retail scale, the retail industry is constantly encountering new challenges in service management. For the retail sector, how to do a better job in offline service quality management and how to retain customers with a high degree of loyalty has become one of the critical factors in the retail industry in obtaining sustainable business operations. Therefore, the retail sector needs to identify the influencing factors on Physical Retail service quality and determine the relevant weights to improve service quality. The SNAKE ROSES Framework is an innovative, practical, and teachable business model that improves upon the original Retail Business Scale, focusing on Eastern cultures. The framework (46 indicators, as in Table 3) also creates a measurable, consistent indicator for sustainability performance assessment, providing companies and frontline salespersons with clear goals and guidelines with regards to customer service quality.

5.2. Practical Implications

Peter Drucker stated, “The purpose of business is to create customers [77]”. In frontline customer service, positive attitudes from the salesperson have a more substantial impact on customers than negative attitudes [78]. PZB (1985) [41] confirmed that the frontline salesperson’s sincere and friendly attitude is essential in determining service quality. Drawing from the Taiwanese retail experience, this study found that the intangible indicators, sincerity and keenness, can better cater to customer needs than blindly following the axiom “the customers are always right”. This study focuses on the impact of intangible service quality on business sustainability and treats the SNAKE ROSES indicators as a framework for measurability and sustainability; the training of frontline salespersons is strengthened in order to improve their service and customer interaction skills; more emphasis is placed on Sincerity, Neatness, Attentiveness, Keenness, Empathy, Reliability, Optimism, Steadfastness, Expertise, and Store Policy in the formation process.

5.3. Limitations

We consulted 20 experts in the frontline retail industry to construct our framework, designed to be practical and teachable to a frontline salesperson. However, the experiences included in this study may reflect something other than the frontline salesperson. In a follow-up study, we interviewed 700 frontline salespersons regarding their expertise to validate the SNAKE ROSES framework. We recommend refining SNAKE ROSES to the particular context before implementation.

5.4. Directions for Future Research

The framework was constructed with expert input. We recommend that further research include front-line salespeople and “on-the-ground” retail experience and is imported into actual corporate operations to analyze the different perceptions of companies and employees. This will allow further refinement of the SNAKE ROSES framework.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-C.H.; methodology, C.-T.H.; validation, T.-C.H. and C.-T.H.; formal analysis, T.-C.H.; data curation, T.-C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-C.H. and C.-T.H.; writing—review and editing, T.-C.H. and C.-T.H.; visualization, T.-C.H.; supervision, C.-T.H.; project administration, T.-C.H. and C.-T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the nature of the study, that did not concern or expose any personal information.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Waqanimaravu, M.; Arasanmi, C.N. Employee training and service quality in the hospitality industry. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2020, 23, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ryu, M.H.; Kim, E.; Lee, S.Y. How offline retailers adopt O2O: Neighboring star shops and their proximity effect. Telecommun. Policy 2022, 46, 102278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruiz-Real, J.L.; Uribe-Toril, J.; Gázquez-Abad, J.C.; de Pablo Valenciano, J. Sustainability and Retail: Analysis of Global Research. Sustainability 2019, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fu, B.; Ming, H.H. Differential Application of OMO Model in Tourism Shopping. Romphruek J. 2020, 38, 95–111. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu, T.; Song, T.; Lu, X. Can Online-Merge-Offline Technology Create Incremental Revenues in Offline Retail? Available online: http://2021.cswimworkshop.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/cswim2021_paper_68.pdf (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  6. Allianz Global Wealth Report 2022. Available online: https://www.allianz.com.cn/company-news-info.php?newsid=114461 (accessed on 30 November 2022).
  7. Zhang, M.; He, X.; Qin, F.; Fu, W.; He, Z. Service quality measurement for omnichannel retail: Scale development and validation. Total Qual. Manag. 2019, 30, S210–S226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Holmlund, M.; Van Vaerenbergh, Y.; Ciuchita, R.; Ravald, A.; Sarantopoulos, P.; Ordenes, F.V.; Zaki, M. Customer experience management in the age of big data analytics: A strategic framework. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. İri, R. The Scale for The Attitudes of Customers Towards Purchasing Tendency within the Context of Business, Marketing, and Sales Officers’ Genders: A Validity and Reliability Study. BMIJ 2020, 8, 2776–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seturi, M. About Customer’s Attitude Towards Service in Retail Stores. JISP 2020, 14, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rayburn, S.W.; Badrinarayanan, V.; Anderson, S.T.; Gupta, A. Continuous techno-training and business-to-business salesperson success: How boosting techno-efficacy enhances sales effort and performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Islam, M.M.; Hani, F.F. Hopes and reality: Consumers’ purchase intention towards whitening cream. Future Bus. J. 2021, 7, 7–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ekawati, N.; Yasa, N.; Kusumadewi, N.; Setini, M. The effect of hedonic value, brand personality appeal, and attitude towards behavioral intention. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2021, 11, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Delbecq, A.L.; Van de Ven, A.H.; Gustafson, D.H. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominalgroup and Delphi Processes; Scott, Foresman and Company: Fair Lawn, NJ, USA, 1975; ISBN 13 978-0673075918. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pavlov, I.P. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1927; p. 142. [Google Scholar]
  16. Watson, J.B. Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychol. Rev. 1913, 20, 158–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, M.; Wu, X.; Ling, Q. Assessing the effectiveness of empowerment on service quality: A multi-level study of Chinese tourism firms. Tour. Manag. 2017, 61, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, C.M.J.; Che-Ha, N.; Alwi, S.F.S. Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. JOBR 2021, 122, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Veloso, C.M.; Magalhães, D.; Sousa, B.B.; Walter, C.E.; Valeri, M. Encouraging consumer loyalty: The role of family business in hospitality. J. Fam. Bus. Manag. 2021; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
  20. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 1988, 64, 12–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fakieh, B.; Happonen, A. Exploring the Social Trend Indications of Utilizing E-Commerce during and after COVID-19′s Hit. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuen, E.F.; Chan, S.S. The effect of retail service quality and product quality on customer loyalty. J. Database Mark. Cust. Strategy Manag. 2010, 17, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pei, X.L.; Guo, J.N.; Wu, T.J.; Zhou, W.X.; Yeh, S.P. Does the effect of customer experience on customer satisfaction create a sustainable competitive advantage? A comparative study of different shopping situations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pinto, J.P.; Veloso, C.M.; Sousa, B.B.; Valeri, M.; Walter, C.E.; Lopes, E. Managerial Practices and (Post) Pandemic Consumption of Private Labels: Online and Offline Retail Perspective in a Portuguese Context. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jahn, G.; Schramm, M.; Spiller, A. The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool. J. Consum. Policy 2005, 28, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abrar, M.; Safeer, A.A.; Baig, S.A.; Ghafoor, A. E-Marketing and Its Implementation on Developing Social Perceptions of Customers through Effective Marketing Mix of Organic Textile Products. AJIBM 2016, 6, 1194–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Heskett, J.L.; Jones, T.O.; Loveman, G.W.; Sasser, W.E.; Schlesinger, L.A. Putting the Service-profit Chain to Work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1994, 72, 164–174. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tansuhaj, P.; Randall, D.; McCullough, J. A Services Marketing Management Model: Integrating Internal and External Marketing Functions. J. Serv. Mrk. 1988, 2, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Budur, T.; Poturak, M. Employee performance and customer loyalty: Mediation effect of customer satisfaction. MEJM 2021, 8, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shekar, C. A Study on the Customer Relationship Management in Retail Marketing. IJRMS 2019, 4, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  31. Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N.; Dospinescu, O. The impact of social media peer communication on customer behavior—Evidence from Romania. Argum. Oeconomica 2022, 1, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. In the Second Half of the Internet, There Is an Opportunity Called “OMO,” the Daily Headlines, Looking for Chinese Entrepreneurs. Available online: https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/news/zne5vjq.html (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  33. Xie, C.; You, W.; Lin, H.; Lin, S. The Present Situation and Future Thinking of Purchasing “New Retail” BT—1st International Symposium on EDMI; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, W.; Si, S. Disruptive Innovation in Retailing Context: Digital Trends and the Internationalization of the Yiwu Commodity Market. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, R.; Dan, L.; Da, X.; Huo, F.; Wang, F. Research on the Motivation and Path of New Logistics Development under the New Retail Era. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. 2019, 295, 32083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Taherdoost, H.; Madanchian, M. Empirical Modeling of Customer Satisfaction for E-Services in Cross-Border E-Commerce. Electronics 2021, 10, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gyenge, B.; Máté, Z.; Vida, I.; Bilan, Y.; Vasa, L. A New Strategic Marketing Management Model for the Specificities of E-Commerce in the Supply Chain. JTAER 2021, 16, 1136–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. J. Retail. 1991, 67, 420–450. [Google Scholar]
  39. Moon, Y.; Armstrong, D.J. Service quality factors affecting customer attitudes in online-to-offline commerce. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2020, 18, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. James, T.L.; Calderon, E.D.V.; Cook, D.F. Exploring patient perceptions of healthcare service quality through analysis of unstructured feedback. Expert Syst. Appl. 2017, 71, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 1985, 49, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rashid, A.; Rokade, V. Service Quality Influence Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: A Study in Organized Food and Grocery Retail. UKH J. Soc. Sci. 2019, 3, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chin, W.W. PLS-Graph User’s Guide. In USA: CT Bauer College of Business; University of Houston: Houston, TX, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  44. Duaerte, P.; Silva, S.; Ferreira, M. How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. JRCS 2018, 44, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ihtiyar, A.; Ahmad, F.S. Impact of intercultural competence on service quality and satisfaction in the grocery retailing: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Sci. Manag. 2012, 1, 13–28. [Google Scholar]
  46. Babakus, E.; Boller, G.W. An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J. Bus. Res. 1992, 24, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carman, J.M. Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions. J. Retail. 1990, 66, 33–55. [Google Scholar]
  48. Cronin, J.J.; Taylor, S.A. Measuring Service Quality. J. Mark. 1992, 56, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dabholkar, P.A.; Thorpe, D.I.; Rentz, J.O. A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1996, 24, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. James, O.S. Developers and terminators in hypermarkets’ relationships with Chinese customers. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2009, 21, 280–293. [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Cao, Y. Understanding Consumer Online Impulse Buying in Live Streaming E-Commerce: A Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework. IJERPH 2022, 19, 4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Martin, W.B. Defining What Quality Service Is for You. Cornell Hotel Restaur. Admin. Q. 1986, 26, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larsen, S.; Bastiansen, T. Service Attitude in Hotel and Restaurant Staff and Nurses. IJCHM 1992, 4, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Juran, A. Universal Approach to Managing for Quality. Qual. Prog. 1974, 19, 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  55. Joseph, R.L. Sales People Don’t Lie; Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 2018; ISBN 978-93-528-0712-3. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zimmerman, C.D. Quality: Key to Service Productivity. Qual. Prog. 1985, 18, 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sasser, W.E.; Olsen, R.P.; Wyckoff, D.D. Management of Service Operations: Text, Cases, and Readings; Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1978; ISBN 978-0205061044. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sujan, R.E. Consumer Behavior Towards Departmental Stores. Think India J. 2019, 22, 8864–8869. [Google Scholar]
  59. Omar, S.I.; Fernando, J.; Bert, P. Between a rock and a hard place: Seizing the opportunity of demanding customers utilizing frontline service behaviors. JRCS 2020, 53, 101978. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yoo, J. Customer power and frontline employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of psychological empowerment. Eur. J. Mark. 2017, 51, 238–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moorman, C.; Deshapande, R.; Zaltman, G. Factors affecting trust in market relationships. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 81–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Fitzsimmons, J.A.; Fitzsimmons, M.J. Service Management for Competitive Advantage; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 161–187. ISBN 978-0070212176. [Google Scholar]
  63. Arto, L.; Taru, L.; Heidi, W. Retail entrepreneurs’ exit I intentions: Influence and mediations of personality and job-related factors. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 102055. [Google Scholar]
  64. Berman, B.; Evans, J.R.; Chatterjee, P. Retail Management: A Strategic Approach; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  65. Gardner, M.P.; Siomkos, G.J. Toward a methodology for assessing the effects of in-store atmospherics. Adv. Consum. Res. 1986, 13, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  66. Olfuß, J. “Made in China” and Chinese Brand Management Across Cultures: A New Matrix Approach. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2021, 33, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Davies, M.A.; Golob, U.; Kernstock, J.; Powell, S.M. Editorial guidelines and expectations of authors. J. Brand Manag. 2021, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Babčanová, D.; Šujanová, J.; Cagáňová, D.; Horňáková, N.; Chovanová, H.H. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of social network data intended for brand management. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 1693–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Leijerholt, U. What about context in internal brand management? Understanding employee brand commitment in the public sector. J. Mark. Manag. 2021, 37, 1243–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dalkey, N. An experimental study of group opinion: The Delphi method. Futures 1969, 1, 408–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Linstone, H.A.; Turoff, M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. J. Mark. Res. 1975, 18, 317–318. [Google Scholar]
  72. Issac, S.; Michael, W. Handbook in Research and Evaluation; Edits: San Diego, CA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  73. Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. EJOR 1990, 48, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Brereton, P.; Kitchenham, B.A.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Khalil, M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 2007, 80, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Porter, M.E. From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy; Macmillan Education UK: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gronroos, C. From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Manag. Decis. 1994, 32, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Drucker, P. The Practice of Management; Harper Business: New York, NY, USA, 1954; ISBN 0060878975. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kranzbühler, A.-M.; Zerres, A.; Kleijnen, M.H.P.; Verlegh, P.W.J. Beyond valence: A meta-analysis of discrete emotions in the firm–customer encounters. JAMS 2020, 48, 478–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Five stages of the research method.
Figure 1. Five stages of the research method.
Sustainability 15 05579 g001
Table 1. SNAKE ROSES Literature Reference.
Table 1. SNAKE ROSES Literature Reference.
DimensionsDescriptionReference
SincerityThe most critical aspect of customer service is genuine friendliness. A sincere greeting, considered approach, and pleasant demeanor in interacting with customers.[36,50,52,53]
NeatFrontline salespersons should approach customers with a courteous attitude, giving a warm and welcome feeling.[41,49,50,54]
AttentivenessTreat each customer as a VIP and proactively and thoughtfully assist to meet their needs.[49,50,55]
KeennessTo identify customers’ needs and understand their key preferences quickly and early, so the interaction can focus on value generation.[54,56,57,58,59,60]
EmpathyAttentiveness: aim to provide customers with a personalized service, focusing on suitable products and advice.[20,37,59]
ReliabilityService the process quickly and with commitment, accurately documenting customer preferences.[20,49,53,61]
OptimismEntrepreneurs consider optimism an important factor in customer orientation and job satisfaction, leading to emotionally responsive behavior.[31,62,63]
SteadfastDemonstrate a high level of teamwork when selling, not attacking competitors’ products, being able to identify primary customers readily, and provide differentiated services.[1,41,51,64,65]
ExpertiseGood professional skills and knowledge; do not exaggerate the product; provide suitable products.[41,50,53]
Store PolicyDo not be forced to sell products. Prioritize the interests of customers when there is a conflict with company policy.[49,50,53]
Table 2. Delphi technique second round data analysis.
Table 2. Delphi technique second round data analysis.
IndicatorsAppropriatenessConsistencyRemarks
MMoSDQ
1. Sincerity in customer service 5.00 50.0000.000reserve
2. Maintaining a happy mood at work4.98 50.3620.000reserve
3. Smile always on your face4.74 50.6760.000reserve
4. Smiling and body language coordination4.56 40.5940.500reserve
5. See the advantages of customers at first glance4.56 50.3540.000reserve
6. Praise customers generously4.55 50.2580.000reserve
7. Sincerely care about customers4.27 50.5160.500reserve
8. Speak humorously4.55 50.4240.000reserve
9. Proper time up, swallow your pride5.00 50.0000.000reserve
10. Listen attentively to customer questions4.73 50.5940.000reserve
11. Try to meet customer needs4.64 50.3520.000reserve
12. Warm greetings and gratitude4.61 50.6400.500reserve
13. Know how to resolve customer’s emotions4.62 50.5110.500reserve
14. Observe customer behavior appropriately4.55 50.4140.500reserve
15. Understanding customer motivation to purchase4.72 50.4580.500reserve
16. Guiding the preferences of main buyers4.77 50.5160.000reserve
17. Respond to customer questions promptly5.00 50.0000.000reserve
18. Customer first4.70 50.5480.000reserve
19. Thinking of our customers from the heart4.49 50.4640.000reserve
20. Introduce the company’s products truthfully4.41 50.3120.000reserve
21. Keep the conversation in a good tone4.74 50.3520.000reserve
22. Focus on customer service4.60 50.5070.000reserve
23. Be organized4.27 40.7990.500reserve
24. Familiar with the workflow4.77 50.3520.000reserve
25. The service process can be done quickly4.68 50.6430.500reserve
26. Good communication skills4.43 50.7280.500reserve
27. Correctly recording customer preferences4.23 40.6400.500reserve
28. Be able to control negative emotions4.83 50.5160.000reserve
29. Maintain a suitable attitude when serving4.58 50.3520.000reserve
30. Take care of customer self-esteem4.98 50.1480.000reserve
31. Think positively4.35 50.7240.500reserve
32. Tolerance of bad emotions among customers4.73 50.4580.500reserve
33. Identify VIP promptly4.59 50.4140.500reserve
34. Customized Service4.53 50.6320.500reserve
35. Teamwork4.23 40.6730.500reserve
36. Do not attack opponent products4.97 50.2580.000reserve
37. No exaggeration of product benefits4.67 50.4880.500reserve
38. Spearing professional terminology when appropriate4.46 50.6400.500reserve
39. Market Sensitivity4.13 40.6400.500reserve
40. Provide customers with suitable products4.85 50.3520.000reserve
41. Enhance your expertise4.63 50.4580.500reserve
42. Prioritize customer interests4.87 50.3520.000reserve
43. Delivering the brand concept4.76 50.5160.500reserve
44. Handle issues flexibly4.47 50.6400.500reserve
45. Don’t push customers to buy4.80 50.4580.500reserve
46. Implementation of company policies4.67 50.4780.500reserve
Overall Average4.64 0.461
Table 3. SNAKE ROSES framework.
Table 3. SNAKE ROSES framework.
DimensionsSub-DimensionsIndicators
SSincerityFriendly1. Sincerity in customer service
Friendly2. Maintaining a happy mood at work
Smile3. Smile always on your face
Smile4. Smiling and body language coordination
NNeatapproachable 5. See the advantages of customers at first glance
Courtesy6. Praise customers generously
Courtesy 7. Sincerely care about customers
approachable8. Speak humorously
AAttentivenessHelpful 9. Proper time up, swallow your pride
Helpful10. Listen attentively to customer questions
Enthusiasm11. Try to meet customer needs
Enthusiasm12. Warm greetings and gratitude
Enthusiasm13. Know how to resolve customer’s emotions
KKeennessObservation 14. Observe customer behavior appropriately
Observation15. Understanding customer motivation to purchase
Promptness 16. Guiding the preferences of main buyers
Promptness17. Respond to customer questions promptly
EEmpathyRespect18. Customer first
Communication 19. Thinking of our customers from the heart
Communication20. Introduce the company’s products truthfully
Communication21. Keep the conversation in a good tone
Respect22. Focus on customer service
RReliabilityReaction23. Be organized
Doing it Right24. Familiar with the workflow
Reaction25. The service process can be done quickly
Reaction26. Good communication skills
Doing it Right27. Correctly recording customer preferences
OOptimismPositive Thinking28. Be able to control negative emotions
Tolerant29. Maintain a suitable attitude when serving
Tolerant30. Take care of customer self-esteem
Positive Thinking 31. Think positively
Tolerant32. Tolerance of bad emotions among customers
SSteadfastNone33. Identify VIP promptly
34. Customized Service
35. Teamwork
36. Do not attack opponent products
EExpertiseProfessional Expression37. No exaggeration of product benefits
Professional Expression38. Spearing professional terminology when appropriate
Learning Skill 39. Market Sensitivity
Professional Expression40. Provide customers with suitable products
Learning Skill41. Enhance your expertise
SStore PolicyNone42. Prioritize customer interests
43. Delivering the brand concept
44. Handle issues flexibly
45. Don’t push customers to buy
46. Implementation of company policies
Table 4. AHP index weights and ranking.
Table 4. AHP index weights and ranking.
Dimensions
(Weight)
RankingSub-DimensionsIndicatorsWeightRanking
Sincerity
(0.232)
1Friendly1. Sincerity in customer service 0.0851
Friendly2. Maintaining a happy mood at work0.0574
Smile3. Smile always on your face0.01915
Smile4. Smiling and body language coordination0.00831
Neat
(0.047)
9approachable 5. See the advantages of customers at first glance0.0358
Courtesy6. Praise customers generously0.0358
Courtesy 7. Sincerely care about customers0.00642
approachable8. Speak humorously0.00832
Attentiveness
(0.150)
3Helpful 9. Proper time up swallow your pride0.0843
Helpful10. Listen attentively to customer questions0.01718
Enthusiasm11. Try to meet customer needs0.01719
Enthusiasm12. Warm greetings and gratitude0.01028
Enthusiasm13. Know how to resolve customer’s emotions0.01027
Keenness
(0.151)
2Observation 14. Observe customer behavior appropriately0.00832
Observation15. Understanding customer motivation to purchase0.0445
Promptness 16. Guiding the preferences of main buyers0.03113
Promptness17. Respond to customer questions promptly0.0851
Empathy
(0.067)
6Respect18. Customer first0.01219
Communication 19. Thinking of our customers from the heart0.00736
Communication20. Introduce the company’s products truthfully0.00835
Communication21. Keep the conversation in a good tone0.01717
Respect22. Focus on customer service0.01726
Reliability
(0.047)
9Reaction23. Be organized0.00641
Doing it Right24. Familiar with the workflow0.02014
Reaction25. The service process can be done quickly0.01423
Reaction26. Good communication skills0.03112
Doing it Right27. Correctly recording customer preferences0.00640
Optimism
(0.069)
5Positive Thinking28. Be able to control negative emotions0.00834
Tolerant29. Maintain a suitable attitude when serving0.00737
Tolerant30. Take care of customer self-esteem0.01719
Positive Thinking 31. Think positively0.00644
Tolerant32. Tolerance of bad emotions among customers0.01719
Steadfast
(0.063)
7None33. Identify VIP promptly0.0358
34. Customized Service0.01030
35. Teamwork0.00643
36. Do not attack opponent products0.0358
Expertise
(0.058)
8Professional Expression37. No exaggeration of product benefits0.01424
Professional Expression38. Spearing professional terminology when appropriate0.00739
Learning Skill 39. Market Sensitivity0.00546
Professional Expression40. Provide customers with suitable products0.0416
Learning Skill41. Enhance your expertise0.01028
Store Policy
(0.123)
4None42. Prioritize customer interests0.0407
43. Delivering the brand concept0.01915
44. Handle issues flexibly0.00738
45. Don’t push customers to buy0.00645
46. Implementation of company policies0.01424
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, T.-C.; Ho, C.-T. Are Customers Always Right? The Importance of Sincerity and Keenness in Creating Retail Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065579

AMA Style

Huang T-C, Ho C-T. Are Customers Always Right? The Importance of Sincerity and Keenness in Creating Retail Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6):5579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Ting-Chung, and Chien-Ta Ho. 2023. "Are Customers Always Right? The Importance of Sincerity and Keenness in Creating Retail Sustainable Development" Sustainability 15, no. 6: 5579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065579

APA Style

Huang, T. -C., & Ho, C. -T. (2023). Are Customers Always Right? The Importance of Sincerity and Keenness in Creating Retail Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(6), 5579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop