Using Behavioral Characteristics to Design Amphibian Ladders for Concrete-Lined Irrigation Channels
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Animal Collection and Rearing
2.3. Experiment
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. The Limiting Climb Gradient of Frogs and Its Influencing Factors
3.2. Behavioral Characteristic of Frog Escape
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The habitats and behavioral characteristics of frogs were investigated in order to provide information for designing engineered modifications for the concrete-lining of field irrigation channels. There is a significant positive correlation between the frogs’ body size and behavioral ability. A larger body size is better for the frogs to escape. All frogs could escape from slopes of less than 45 degrees, and a slope of 65 degrees did not allow the majority of frogs to escape.
- There are linear relationships between the two body-size indicators and limiting climb gradient, and body length has a greater effect on the maximum scansorial gradient than body weight. Almost all frogs’ limiting climb gradients are higher than 52 degrees, and the number can be used for frog conservation in future slope designs. If construction is limited by the terrain, the recommended gradient of amphibious corridors should be smaller than this number, so as to allow almost all frogs to escape.
- Given the frogs’ behavioral characteristics in the escape experiments, an amphibious corridor design for a common field irrigation channel was proposed. The engineered modification method was to set up convex cross-pieces on the revetment of the concrete-lined irrigation channels, and the recommended layout distance of the convex cross-pieces should be 30 cm, 20 cm, 10 cm, 10 cm, 10 cm, and 10 cm from bottom to top, respectively.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yi, L.; Chen, J.; Jin, Z.; Quan, Y.; Han, P.; Guan, S.; Jiang, X. Impacts of human activities on coastal ecological environment during the rapid urbanization process in Shenzhen, China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2018, 154, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgwardt, F.; Robinson, L.; Trauner, D.; Teixeira, H.; Nogueira, A.J.A.; Lillebo, A.I.; Piet, G.; Kuemmerlen, M.; O’Higgins, T.; McDonald, H.; et al. Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 1396–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, M.; Yang, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhu, F.; Qu, J.; Zhang, S. Response of agricultural multifunctionality to farmland loss under rapidly urbanizing processes in Yangtze River Delta, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Fang, C.; Qi, W. Different effects of human settlements changes on landscape fragmentation in China: Evidence from grid cell. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 129, 107927–107937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maes, J.; Musters, C.J.M.; De Snoo, G.R. The effect of agri-environment schemes on amphibian diversity and abundance. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 635–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, T.; Zhou, L. Breeding habitat influences abundance and body condition of rice frog (Fejervarya multistriata) in agricultural landscape of Shanghai, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 279, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, R.L.; Anderson, J.T.; Petty, J.T. Effects of Road Crossings on Stream and Streamside Salamanders. J. Wildl. Manag. 2010, 72, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, L.; Mandrone, V.; D’Andrea, A.; Caro, S. Evaluation of the environmental and human health impact of road construction activities. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1004–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Zeng, G.; Sang, L.; Liu, Q.; Yin, Z.; Dai, J.; Yin, D.; Liang, J.; et al. Effects of dam construction on biodiversity: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 221, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartel, T.; Scheele, B.C.; Rozylowicz, L.; Horcea-Milcu, A.; Cogălniceanu, D. The social context for conservation: Amphibians in human shaped landscapes with high nature values. J. Nat. Conserv. 2020, 53, 125762–125768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scroggie, M.P.; Preece, K.; Nicholson, E.; McCarthy, M.A.; Parris, K.M.; Heard, G.W. Optimizing habitat management for amphibians: From simple models to complex decisions. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 236, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterrett, S.C.; Katz, R.A.; Brand, A.B.; Fields, W.R.; Dietrich, A.E.; Hocking, D.J.; Foreman, T.M.; Wiewel, A.N.M.; Campbell Grant, E.H. Proactive management of amphibians: Challenges and opportunities. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 236, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cushman, S.A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 128, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.H.; Wu, B.Y.; Chuang, T.F.; Lu, H.L. The design method for concrete waterfront amphibian ladder along streams. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 106, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulsford, S.A.; Barton, P.S.; Driscoll, D.A.; Lindenmayer, D.B. Interactive effects of land use, grazing and environment on frogs in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 281, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brito, D. Amphibian conservation: Are we on the right track? Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2912–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boissinot, A.; Besnard, A.; Lourdais, O. Amphibian diversity in farmlands: Combined influences of breeding-site and landscape attributes in western France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 269, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazell, D. Frog ecology in modified Australian landscapes: A review. Wildl. Res. 2003, 30, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, Y.H.; Wu, B.Y. Designation of amphibian corridor referring to the frog’s climbing ability. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 83, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Natuhara, Y. Landscape and local correlates with two green tree-frogs, Rhacophorus (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) in different habitats, central Japan. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 16, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fellers, G.M.; Kleeman, P.M. California Red-legged Frog (Rana Draytonii) Movement and Habitat Use: Implications for Conservation. J. Herpetol. 2007, 41, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Li, B.; Shu, X.; Pei, E.; Yuan, X.; Sun, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, Z. Responses of anuran communities to rapid urban growth in Shanghai, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 20, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T. The impact of roadside ditches on juvenile and sub-adult Bufo melanostictus migration. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reilly, S.; Essner, R.; Wren, S.; Easton, L.; Bishop, P.J. Movement patterns in leiopelmatid frogs: Insights into the locomotor repertoire of basal anurans. Behav. Process. 2015, 121, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.H.; Wu, B.Y.; Lu, H.L. Using the climbing ability of Bufo bankorensis and Hynobius arisanensis to discuss the amphibious corridor design for high altitude areas. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 95, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Hou, J.; Qian, J.; Rao, L.; Ao, Y. Main contents and key technologies of constructing ecological water-saving irrigation district. Water Resour. Prot. 2015, 31, 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Bi, B.; Chen, D.; Bi, L.; Rutherfurd, I.; Tang, S.; Chen, J. Design of engineered modifications to allow frogs to escape from irrigation channels. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 156, 105967–105978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuang, T.F.; Chang, Y.H. A New Design Concept of an Ecological Corridor for Frogs to Improve Ecological Conservation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ye, X.; Zhao, Y. Ecological transformation technology of field channel and its application. Zhejiang Hydrotech. 2015, 5, 31–32. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Herzon, I.; Helenius, J. Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 1171–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, W.S.; Chang, Y.H.; Wang, H.W.; Tan, Y.C. Using the behavior of seven amphibian species for the design of banks of irrigation and drainage systems in Taiwan. Irrig. Drain. 2010, 59, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Wu, C.; Yu, J. Ecological design of irrigation and drainage ditches in agricultural land consolidation. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2011, 27, 148–153. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Beben, D. Crossings Construction as a Method of Animal Conservation. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, J.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Y. Urban ecological corridors construction: A review. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, X. Review of fishway research in China. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 115, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nori, J.; Lemes, P.; Urbina-Cardona, N.; Baldo, D.; Lescano, J.; Loyola, R. Amphibian conservation, land-use changes and protected areas: A global overview. Biol. Conserv. 2015, 191, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, L.L.; Muths, E. Integrating amphibian movement studies across scales better informs conservation decisions. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 236, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lianshui County People’s Government. Irrigation Development Plan in Lianshui County, Jiangsu Province (2010–2020). 2012. Available online: https://www.docin.com/p-1447681172.html (accessed on 1 October 2020). (In Chinese)
- National Forestry and Grassland Administration. A List of Land Wildlife Protected by the State as Beneficial or of Important Economic and Scientific Value. 2000. Available online: http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/3954/content-959027.html (accessed on 15 January 2021). (In Chinese)
- Fei, L.; Ye, C.; Jiang, J. Colored Atlas of Chinese Amphibians and Their Distributions; Sichuan Science and Technology Press: Chengdu, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- IUCN. Pelophylax nigromaculatus. 2004. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/58679/11809026 (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- National Forestry Administration. Code of Practice for Terrestrial Wildlife and Its Habitat Survey. 2011. Available online: http://www.forestry.gov.cn/portal/main/govfile/13/govfile_1817.htm (accessed on 1 July 2021). (In Chinese)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bi, B.; Tong, J.; Lei, S.; Chen, D.; Jin, Q.; Hong, D.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, S. Using Behavioral Characteristics to Design Amphibian Ladders for Concrete-Lined Irrigation Channels. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076029
Bi B, Tong J, Lei S, Chen D, Jin Q, Hong D, Wang X, Chen J, Zhao S. Using Behavioral Characteristics to Design Amphibian Ladders for Concrete-Lined Irrigation Channels. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):6029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076029
Chicago/Turabian StyleBi, Bo, Jian Tong, Shaohua Lei, Dan Chen, Qiu Jin, Dalin Hong, Xiaojun Wang, Jing Chen, and Siyuan Zhao. 2023. "Using Behavioral Characteristics to Design Amphibian Ladders for Concrete-Lined Irrigation Channels" Sustainability 15, no. 7: 6029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076029
APA StyleBi, B., Tong, J., Lei, S., Chen, D., Jin, Q., Hong, D., Wang, X., Chen, J., & Zhao, S. (2023). Using Behavioral Characteristics to Design Amphibian Ladders for Concrete-Lined Irrigation Channels. Sustainability, 15(7), 6029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076029