COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Management of the Basic Quality Conditions in Universities of Peru, 2022
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Research Problem, Objectives and Questions
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Higher Education
2.1.1. Sustainable Higher Education
2.1.2. Educational Regulations
2.1.3. Higher Education and COVID-19
2.2. Crisis Management
2.3. Distance Education
2.4. Organizational Image
2.5. Student Satisfaction
2.6. Basic Quality Conditions
3. Theoretical Model
Hypotheses
- Crisis management, distance education, the organizational image, and student satisfaction have direct effects on the basic quality conditions of universities in the south of the country.
- Crisis management has direct effects on the basic quality conditions of universities in the south of the country.
- Distance education has direct effects on the basic quality conditions of universities in the south of the country.
- The organizational image has direct effects on the basic quality conditions of universities in the south of the country.
- Student satisfaction has direct effects on the basic quality conditions of universities in the south of the country.
4. Data and Methodology
4.1. Sampling
4.2. Study Tools
- Crisis management dimension [GC]: this dimension was built with the information on the competencies that emerged for the universities in the south of the country during the pandemic. In other words, we sought to identify the perceptions of the signs of crisis at the universities before the pandemic. This included the will to generate strategies and scenarios related to the educational quality and training as well as the detection of the risks that the crisis could cause. This dimension contains seven items, and the scale developed by [26] was used. Perceptions before the crisis [α = 0.773], during the crisis [α = 0.789], and after the crisis [α = 0.819] were assessed. A global scale value of Cronbach’s alpha of [=0.902] was obtained.
- Distance-education Dimension [ED]: this covered the opportunities offered by universities in the south of the country to students during the period of the health emergency. The measurement scale used was that of [34], which consists of 21 items with five subdimensions to investigate the competencies of teachers regarding distance education; students’ attitudes towards online assessments; a comparison with face-to-face education; and communication processes and access to distance education. Satisfaction with the opportunities offered by distance universities [α = 0.565], attitudes towards professors in distance education [α = 0.624], attitudes towards online exams [α = 0.474], communication and access in distance education [α = 0.592], and the comparison with face-to-face education [α = 0.499] were assessed.
- Organizational Image Dimension [IO]: this dimension was used to analyze the image of universities in the pandemic period. The purpose of the dimension was to determine the perceptions of the students regarding the quality of their academic lives and the relationship with the world of work. The items considered were in accordance with [42]. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the global scale was [=0.877].
- Student Satisfaction Dimension [SE]: this scale includes 45 items and had the purpose of obtaining information on the general perceptions of students about their universities. The Simsek, Islim and Öztürk scale [48] was used. It consists of six dimensions. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the global scale was [=0.896].
- The Basic Quality Conditions [CBC]: this dimension contains six subdimensions and is used to measure the basic quality conditions based on the SUNEDU recommendations [10]. The value of Cronbach’s alpha for the global scale is [=0.879].
4.3. Data Analysis
4.4. Findings and Interpretation
Findings of the Dimension Analysis
4.5. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Criterion | Definition |
Accessibility | Non-face-to-face adaptation seeks to facilitate accessible learning alternatives, materially and economically, for students. |
Adaptability | Non-face-to-face adaptations are oriented to the type of subject, its corresponding activities, and the instruments used to measure the achievements of the students. Educational strategies are adapted to non-face-to-face teaching, in line with the COVID-19 prevention and control measures. |
Quality | Non-face-to-face adaptations seek to provide high quality conditions similar to those of face-to-face provision, taking their unique features into account. |
Availability | The implementation of non-face-to-face adaptations ensures the timely provision of services and their availability without unjustified interruptions. |
Tracking | Timely monitoring of changes in the academic planning of subjects and their respective development is ensured. |
Relevance and coherence | The academic departments, postgraduate units, or bodies in which they take place must ensure the coherence and relevance of the non-face-to-face adaptations, according to the content of each academic program. |
Note: National Superintendence of University Higher Education (SUNEDU, 2020) [10]. |
References
- Toklucu, E.; Silman, F.; Turan, S.; Atasoy, R.; Kalkan, U. The Effects of the Crisis Management Skills and Distance Education Practices of Universities on Student Satisfaction and Organizational Image. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owens, T.L. Higher education in the sustainable development goals framework. Eur. J. Educ. 2017, 52, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sá, M.J.; Serpa, S. The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity to Foster the Sustainable Development of Teaching in Higher Education. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi, M.; Zimon, G.; Ghaderi, A.R.; Hasan, Z.A. The Relationship between Prevention and Panic from COVID-19, Ethical Principles, Life Expectancy, Anxiety, Depression and Stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pool, L.D.; Sewell, P. The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Educ. Train. 2007, 49, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, G.M.; Asimiran, S. Online technology: Sustainable higher education or diploma disease for emerging society during emergency—Comparison between pre and during COVID-19. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 172, 121034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cifuentes-Faura, J.; Obor, D.O.; To, L.; Al-Naabi, I. Cross-cultural impacts of COVID-19 on higher education learning and teaching practices in Spain, Oman, Nigeria and Cambodia: A cross-cultural study. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pr. 2021, 18, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paudel, P. Online Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies During and After COVID-19 in Higher Education. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 2020, 3, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Zhou, Y.; Hussain, K.; Nair, P.; Ragavan, A. Does higher education service quality affect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2016, 24, 70–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SUNEDU. Aprueban los Criterios Para la Supervisión de la Adaptación de la Educación No Presencial, Con Carácter Excepcional, de las Asignaturas por Parte de Universidades y Escuelas de Posgrado Como Consecuencia de las Medidas Para Prevenir y Controlar el COVID19. 27 de Marzo de 2020. 2020. Available online: https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/download/url/aprueban-los-criterios-para-la-supervision-de-la-adaptacion-resolucion-n-039-2020-sunedu-cd-1865206-1 (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Aleixo, A.M.; Leal, S.; Azeiteiro, U.M. Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1664–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, G.M. Sustainable Education and Sustainability in Education: The Reality in the Era of Internationalisation and Commodification in Education—Is Higher Education Different? Sustainability 2023, 15, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ley 30220. Ley Universitaria. Diario Oficial El Peruano. (09 de Julio de 2014). Available online: https://www.sunedu.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Ley-universitaria-30220.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Ley 28303. Ley Marco de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica, Congreso de la República del Perú. (27 de Julio de 2004). Available online: https://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/Documentos/Leyes/28303.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Ley 30512. Ley de Institutos y Escuelas de Educación Superior y de la Carrera Pública de sus Docentes. (31 de Octubre de 2016). Available online: https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/ley-de-institutos-y-escuelas-de-educacion-superior-y-de-la-c-ley-n-30512-1448564-1/ (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). Organización de las Naciones Unidas Para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. 14 October 2022. Available online: https://www.un.org/es/impacto-acad%C3%A9mico/educaci%C3%B3n-superior (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Ordorika, I. Pandemia y educación superior. Rev. Educ. Super. 2020, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umaña-Mata, A.C. Educación Superior en Tiempos de COVID-19: Oportunidades y retos de la educación a distancia. Innovaciones Educ. 2020, 22, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crawford, J.; Butler-Henderson, K.; Rudolph, J.; Malkawi, B.; Glowatz, M.; Burton, R.; Magni, P.A.; Lam, S. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 2020, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lansiti, M.; Richards, G. Coronavirus Is Widening the Corporate Digital Divide. Harvard Business Review. 2020. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/03/coronavirus-is-widening-the-corporate-digital-divide (accessed on 12 February 2023).
- Jiménez, Y.; Ruiz, M. Reflexiones Sobre los Desafíos que Enfrenta la Educación Superior en Tiempos de COVID-19. Econ. Y Desarro. 2021, 165, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Can, H.; Azizoglu, Ö.A.; Aydin, E.M. Organizasyon ve Yönetim; Siyasal Kitabevi: Ankara, Turkey, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Karadağ, E.; Yücel, C. Distance education at universities during the new type of coronavirus pandemic: An evaluation study within the scope of undergraduate students. J. High. Educ. 2020, 10, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozkurt, A.; Sharma, R. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian J. Distance Educ. 2020, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Parker, C.; Ramirez, R.; Smith, J.; Plonowski, L. Simultaneous Delivery of a Face-to-Face Course to On-Campus and Remote Off-Campus Students. Techtrends 2010, 54, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksu, A.; Deveci, S. İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin kriz yönetimi becerileri. Educ. Sci. 2009, 4, 448–464. [Google Scholar]
- Pregowska, A.; Masztalerz, K.; Garlińska, M.; Osial, M. A worldwide journey through distance education—from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruder, I. Distance Learning: What’s Holding Back This Boundless Delivery System? Electron. Learn. 1989, 8, 30–35. [Google Scholar]
- Shahabadi, M.M.; Uplane, M. Synchronous and Asynchronous e-learning Styles and Academic Performance of e-learners. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 176, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palvia, S.; Aeron, P.; Gupta, P.; Mahapatra, D.; Parida, R.; Rosner, R.; Sindhi, S. Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2018, 21, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, I.; Seaman, J. Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011; Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group: Newburyport, MA, USA, 2011.
- Shelton, K.; Saltsman, G. An Administrator’s Guide to Online Education; IAP: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2005.
- Kreber, C. What’s it really all about? The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as an Authentic Practice. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach Learn 2007, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arslan, R. Salgin döneminde uygulanan uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilim. Fakültesi Derg. 2021, 12, 369–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbin, M.C.; de Oliveira, E.T.; Telles, S. Active methodologies supported by interaction and communication technologies in higher education. Glob. J. Inf. Technol. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 11, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dikmen, S.; Bahçeci, F. COVID-19 Pandemisi Sürecinde Yükseköğretim Kurumlarının Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Stratejileri: Fırat Üniversitesi Örneği. Turk. J. Educ. Stud. 2020, 7, 78–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mory, W.; Calla, K.; Espinoza, R.; Trujillo, M.; Jaramillo-Alejos, P.; Morillo-Flores, J. Disruption Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic in Peruvian University Education. Int. J. High. Educ. 2020, 9, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Küçüksüleymanoğlu, R. The influence of Organizational Image on Academic Success for International Students. Int. J. High. Educ. 2017, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renihan, F.I.; Renihan, P.J. Institutional Image: The Concept and Implications for Administrative Action. NASSP Bull. 1989, 73, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gafoor, K.A.; Ashraf, P.M. Contextual influences on sources of academic self-efficacy: A validation with secondary school students of Kerala. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2012, 13, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atlas, D. Üniversite öğrencileri memnuniyet araştırması. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilim. Derg. 2006, 21, 439–458. [Google Scholar]
- Polat, S.; Abat, E.; Tezyürek, S. The Perceiver Corporate Image of Private Secondary School by students’ and partents’ views. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2010, 2, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
- González-Gómez, D.; Jeong, J.; Rodríguez, D. Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach. J. Sci. Educ. 2016, 25, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J. An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2014, 15, 11–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, M.G. Editorial, What Does Research Say About the Learners Using Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Learning? Am. J. Distance Educ. 2002, 16, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, Ó.; Aguilar, M.; Aguilar, F.; Lucas, M. Co-Design of a 3D Virtual Campus for Synchronous Distance Teaching Based on Student Satisfaction: Experience at the University of Almería (Spain). Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolverton, C.; Hollier, B.; Lanier, P. The Impact of Computer Self Efficacy on Student Engagement and Group Satisfaction in Online Business Courses. Electron. J. E-Learn. 2020, 18, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simşek, H.; İslim, Ö.; Öztürk, N. Yükseköğretimde kalite arayışında bir gösterge olarak öğrenci memnuniyeti: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Trak. Eğitim Derg. 2019, 9, 380–395. [Google Scholar]
- Becker, G.S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguirre, F. Permanencia en educación universitaria en Perú. Rev. Análisis Económico Financ. 2020, 2, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chairez, G.I.M.; Araiza, A.G.; Ornelas, M.M.V. El desempeño docente y la calidad educativa. Ra Ximhai Rev. Científica Soc. Cult. Desarro. Sosten. 2016, 12, 123–134. [Google Scholar]
- Kotler, P.; Keller, K.L. Marketing Management, 12th ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Neter, J.; Kutner, M.H.; Nachtsheim, C.J.; y Wasserman, W. Applied Linear Statistical Methods; Irwin Series: Chicago, IL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Boström, L.; Collén, C.; Damber, U.; Gidlund, U. A Rapid Transition from Campus to Emergent Distant Education; Effects on Students’ Study Strategies in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filho, W.L.; Eustachio, J.H.P.P.; Caldana, A.C.F.; Will, M.; Salvia, A.L.; Rampasso, I.S.; Anholon, R.; Platje, J.; Kovaleva, M. Sustainability Leadership in Higher Education Institutions: An Overview of Challenges. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Total | 513 | 100.0 |
Sex | ||
Men | 293 | 57.2 |
Women | 220 | 42.8 |
Age (years) | ||
Average | 22 | |
Median | 21 | |
Mode | 20 | |
Minimum | 17 | |
Maximum | 48 | |
Age range | ||
Under 21 years old | 290 | 56.6 |
From 21 to 25 years | 163 | 31.7 |
Over 25 years | 60 | 11.7 |
City | ||
Arequipa | 277 | 54.1 |
Moquegua | 22 | 4.3 |
Fist | 80 | 15.6 |
Tacna | 134 | 26.1 |
University | ||
Catholic University of Santa Maria | 101 | 19.7 |
La salle university | 7 | 1.4 |
National University of San Agustin | 176 | 34.3 |
Jorge Basadre National University | 89 | 17.3 |
Private University of Tacna | 47 | 9.2 |
National University of the Altiplano | 67 | 13.1 |
National University of Juliaca | 12 | 23 |
National University of Moquegua | 14 | 2.7 |
Dimensions | Mean | SD | α | VIF | GC | DE | IO | HE | CBC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC | 2.5419 | 0.56484 | 0.902 | 1804 | 1 | 0.575 ** | 0.510 ** | 0.532 ** | 0.519 ** |
DE | 2.4951 | 0.51961 | 0.899 | 1687 | 1 | 0.519 ** | 0.478 ** | 0.522 ** | |
IO | 2.6296 | 0.52222 | 0.877 | 2371 | 1 | 0.718 ** | 0.616 ** | ||
HE | 2.6043 | 0.54606 | 0.896 | 2276 | 1 | 0.760 ** | |||
CBC | 2.5750 | 0.55439 | 0.879 | 1 |
MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control variables | ||||
Type of university | −0.071 | 0.011 | ||
City | −0.184 | 0.051 | ||
University | −0.110 | −0.044 | ||
Age | −0.074 | −0.011 | ||
Independent variables | ||||
Crisis management | 0.075 | ** | ||
Long-distance education | 0.157 | *** | ||
Organizational image | 0.079 | ** | ||
Student satisfaction | 0.593 | *** | ||
Constant | 0.115 | *** | 0.140 | |
R2 | 0.087 | |||
Increase in R2 | 0.530 | *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vargas Bernuy, J.; Espinoza Vidaurre, S.; Velásquez Rodriguez, N.; Gambetta Quelopana, R.; Martinez Valdivia, A.; Leo Rossi, E. COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Management of the Basic Quality Conditions in Universities of Peru, 2022. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086523
Vargas Bernuy J, Espinoza Vidaurre S, Velásquez Rodriguez N, Gambetta Quelopana R, Martinez Valdivia A, Leo Rossi E. COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Management of the Basic Quality Conditions in Universities of Peru, 2022. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8):6523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086523
Chicago/Turabian StyleVargas Bernuy, Juana, Sam Espinoza Vidaurre, Norma Velásquez Rodriguez, Renza Gambetta Quelopana, Ana Martinez Valdivia, and Ernesto Leo Rossi. 2023. "COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Management of the Basic Quality Conditions in Universities of Peru, 2022" Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086523
APA StyleVargas Bernuy, J., Espinoza Vidaurre, S., Velásquez Rodriguez, N., Gambetta Quelopana, R., Martinez Valdivia, A., & Leo Rossi, E. (2023). COVID-19 and Its Effects on the Management of the Basic Quality Conditions in Universities of Peru, 2022. Sustainability, 15(8), 6523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086523