Next Article in Journal
Towards a Sustainable Preservation of Medieval Colors through the Identification of the Binding Media, the Medieval Tempera
Next Article in Special Issue
Roles of Personal Values and Information Technology Usage in Forming the University Students’ View of Environmental Sustainability: A Preliminary Regional Study of Economics and Business Students
Previous Article in Journal
Cultivating Success: Unveiling the Influence of Higher Education Strategies on Information Technology Governance, Academic Excellence, and Career Prospects in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Students’ Digital Competence Development in the Production of Open Educational Resources in Education for Sustainable Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs

1
Department of Engineering Education, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
R.B. Annis School of Engineering, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46227, USA
3
School of Education, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46227, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(12), 5026; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125026
Submission received: 19 March 2024 / Revised: 10 June 2024 / Accepted: 11 June 2024 / Published: 13 June 2024

Abstract

:
The number of engineers who are transitioning into environmental sustainability careers is growing, though a gap still exists between the supply and demand. This presents an opportunity for undergraduate engineering students to fulfill the demand as environmental sustainability professionals. This qualitative exploratory study investigated environmental sustainability learning experiences and future career interests in environmental sustainability. The social cognitive theory (SCCT) was utilized as a theoretical lens, exploring undergraduate students’ environmental sustainability interests, related learning experiences and their interest in pursuing a future career in environmental sustainability. Twenty-five undergraduate engineering students in various engineering disciplines were interviewed for this study. Data were analyzed to (1) identify the students’ interest in pursuing a career in environmental sustainability, (2) determine if the students’ interests have changed since they began their undergraduate studies, and (3) explore how learning experiences have impacted the students’ future career choices. The findings posit that exposure to environmental sustainability learning experiences is impactful and plays an important role, impacting the students’ interests in pursuing careers in sustainability. The results reveal that elements such as personal beliefs and salary considerations inspire career choices. This research contributes to addressing the demand for additional working professionals who are prepared to tackle environmental sustainability issues, highlighting the role of learning experiences in shaping students’ career interests.

1. Introduction

From an increased frequency in extreme weather events to a rise in sea levels and damaging floods, changing climate impacts are unparalleled [1]. An unrelenting crisis is here. “Code Red for Humanity” is how our climate crisis was defined by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in a UN report on the environmental danger issued in August 2021 [2]. The human element of climate change is affecting future generations and is a persistent issue facing the world [3,4]. Even though humans may be exacerbating climate change, they also have the potential for mitigation. There was a warning in the past, “if the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one-hundred years” [5]. Fast global changes are increasing the demands on multiple resources, while short-term management poses risks to the sustainability of both societies and ecosystems [6]. As shown in Figure 1, there are several sustainable development initiatives and mitigation efforts, as defined by the United Nations’ sustainable development goals [7], which can be considered when thinking about sustainability [8]. Each initiative or mitigation effort may contribute to sustainable development by meeting current resource needs without disturbing resources for future generations.
These goals cover a wide range of issues and are certainly intertwined [9,10]. The goals are not limited solely to environmental sustainability, they also include poverty eradication, social equity, and economic development. When considering careers in environmental sustainability, it is essential to consider how this space intersects with several SDGs, including climate action (SDG13), affordable and clean energy (SDG7), sustainable cities and communities (SDG11), responsible consumption and protection (SDG12), life below water (SDG14), life on land (SDG15) and partnerships for the goals (SDG17). By pursuing careers in environmental sustainability, individuals can contribute to advancing these SDGs, addressing critical environmental challenges. These careers offer opportunities to create positive impacts both locally and globally.
Historically, temperatures continue to rise and climatic events have escalated, negatively impacting the environment, calling for an increased focus on sustainability [11,12]. The current “climate emergency” label shows that a shift in views of environmental sustainability has occurred since the previous crisis label [12]. To use the word emergency rather than crisis is a strong statement, showing the urgency of this phenomenon. This current emergency may be the motivation necessary for action and timely for future engineers to address environmental sustainability issues throughout their careers. “It is therefore crucial that, regardless of major or field of study, university students have classroom experience that affords them a solid grasp of what the SDGs are, how they provide a framework for action, and where they point us as a civilization” [13]. In preparation for this future, it would be valuable to gain a deeper understanding of the career planning factors considered by students who want to work on solutions in environmental sustainability. To address our current climate emergency, we have an opportunity to build on previous research on learning experiences [14].
The integration of environmental sustainability learning experiences into undergraduate engineering education should be a priority because climate change is happening today, and future engineers may be able to solve climate-related issues. Engineering education has been traditionally dominated by content-heavy lectures and integrating sustainability may require a shift in how engineering educators teach, focusing on their intersections [15]. It was determined by Wilson (2019) while examining personal responsibility for sustainability that students in STEM fields expressed a stronger sense of personal responsibility than students in non-STEM fields, reinforcing the idea that the intersection between STEM education and sustainability education is an opportunity for educators to capitalize on the intrinsic motivations [16]. Although every university graduate may not directly work on the UN SDGs, many will at least understand the importance of and interconnectedness of each of the goals [13,17]. Greater exposure to environmental sustainability learning experiences in undergraduate engineering education could help increase the number of future engineers who have a career interest in tackling environmental sustainability initiatives such as those outlined by the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. These newly graduated engineers may help close the gap of the increased need to fill new environmental sustainability-related career vacancies or tackle environmental sustainability issues within non-sustainability positions. “It is well known that engineering education aims to develop students’ critical thinking and problem solving abilities, and enhance their communication skills which are all essential for the success in the engineering field” [18]. According to Ensign (2017), upon graduating with a traditional undergraduate degree, students should also have the necessary skills to secure roles as change agents [19]. Since engineering students are trained to be problem solvers in their undergraduate studies, if we empower these students as change agents, some may choose the career path to be contributors of climate solutions. Exposure augments interest and students may gain the desire to tackle some of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development global challenges as a result of intentional exposure [20]. Some students may actively seek to create environmental sustainability solutions or others may modify their behaviors to avoid worsening current problems because of a sustainability-related learning experience. Some will graduate and enter society as part of “the energetic society”, ensuring that sustainable development goals become a reality [21].
While some work has explored environmental themes in engineering education [22], there remain open questions about connections between those experiences and engineering students’ career interest development. Among other populations, that topic has already been explored. For example, James et al. [23] suggested a model based on their work that connected recreational experiences in nature to career interest in environmental fields. Likewise, Gupta et al. [24] found more structured programs beyond simply recreational play can also help promote interest in environmental careers among pre-college students.
In addition to experiences, there are other categories of factors that can inform career interests. One such category is an interest in doing good. In a survey of Australian undergraduates, Thomas [25] found that simply having an interest in doing good for society is associated with an interest in environmental careers. Other kinds of beliefs such as universalism and benevolence have also been associated with pro-environmental behaviors, though not specific to career interests [26]. Faculty beliefs may also play a role in exposure. For example, Menon et al. (2024) found that of the students who experienced a higher level of sustainability exposure, the educators also expressed a higher level of importance regarding sustainability [27].
This exploratory study aimed to understand how learning experiences related to environmental sustainability in undergraduate studies inform their thinking about potentially pursuing careers in environmental sustainability. Insights were obtained from twenty-five semi-structured interviews. The following research question was explored:
RQ:
How is exposure to environmental sustainability learning experiences in undergraduate engineering courses associated with an interest in pursuing careers in an area of sustainability?

2. Materials and Methods

As described by the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and as illustrated in Figure 2, learning experiences are precursors to both self-efficacy and outcome expectations linking to student career choices. Derived largely from Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the social cognitive career theory (SCCT) focuses on people’s capacity to direct their own vocational behavior strengthening, weakening, or overriding human agency in career development [28]. Its emphasis is on factors that can explain how individuals make career choices. The relationships between each construct illustrate how learning experiences connect to each of the other constructs. For example, a student who has been exposed to an environmental sustainability learning experience and if their self-efficacy is at a level where the student believes that they can make a difference in the world may also envision the outcome as a career in environmental sustainability.
Data collected for this research provided insights into learning experiences and how students form career interests. Semi-structured interviews explored how students’ learning experiences in undergraduate engineering inspired them to consider environmental sustainability career choices. Data collected informed how certain conditions may come to be, such as an interest in a future career in environmental sustainability, or if certain events have occurred, such as an environmental sustainability learning experience. Specifically, for this research, the learning experience construct as it relates to students’ downstream career interest of the SCCT was explored.

2.1. Research Participants

For this study, undergraduate engineering students enrolled in any engineering discipline at a large research-intensive institution in the United States who also enrolled in a green engineering minor who had generally completed 6 semesters of coursework were recruited for interviews. Purposeful sampling requires access to key informants in the field who can help in identifying information-rich cases. This sampling approach involved choosing participants who could be the most informative in this context. Sampling from this group of green engineering minor students provided responses from students who were at least familiar with environmental sustainability and were able to engage in a deep conversation about the topic. Recruitment for the twenty-five semi-structured interviews was facilitated by inviting college students enrolled in the 3-credit course, ENGR3124 Introduction to Green Engineering, during the Fall 2022 semester.

2.2. Data Collection and Analysis

Data for this exploratory research design were first collected by a pre-screening questionnaire and secondly through semi-structured interviews. The pre-screening questionnaire was designed to ensure that the responding participants had at least some exposure and/or knowledge of environmental sustainability so they could engage in a deep conversation during the semi-structured interview to obtain the richest data possible. The interviews were conducted and were uploaded to Dedoose Version 9.0.85, a qualitative data analysis software. A deductive approach was utilized for coding, based on the primary constructs of the SCCT. Dedoose met all needs, including shared access and the ability to collaborate. The pre-screen/recruitment questionnaire consisted of four questions related to SCCT’s person inputs construct. The first question confirmed that enrollment is the green engineering course, the remaining three questions asked for their gender, race/ethnicity and disability/health status as prescribed by the person input construct of the SCCT. The semi-structured interview protocol included seventeen primary questions and probing questions to accommodate the interview’s semi-structured nature. Protocol development and initial codes were guided by the SCCT constructs. Additionally, during the iterative cycles of coding. Qualitative data from the semi-structured interviews were analyzed through the lens of the SCCT to understand how the student’s environmental sustainability learning experiences may have led to an interest to choose a future career in sustainability. The data analysis ran concurrently with the data collection in iterative cycles. A provisional coding plan was utilized for data collected from the interviews, beginning with a list of codes generated from theory, and then allowing other codes to emerge [29]. The SCCT guided the first cycle of coding of the individual interviews focused on several of the SCCT constructs—person inputs, learning experience, self-efficacy, and outcome expectation—while also allowing space for other codes to emerge during the process by constantly comparing new codes with existing codes.
To ensure trustworthiness for the qualitative coding, peer debriefing was utilized [29] and a sample of the excerpts were chosen and coded by two other researchers utilizing the established codes derived from the SCCT constructs and codes that emerged throughout the data analysis process for verification [30].

2.3. Validity

This research featured both strengths and limitations. The student recruitment process was almost seamless, having unwavering support from the chair of the green engineering minor program during the process. The participant response rate was high, perhaps because students were interested in talking about their experiences or because they were incentivized for their participation. The virtual format for data collection through Zoom provided flexibility and logistical ease. The choice to interview students enrolled in the green engineering minor may have been a limitation due to their inherent biases and pre-existing biases and interests in environmental sustainability. Volunteer bias may have affected this research, impacted the findings and contributed to the non-generalizable nature. There was an exceptional level of participation from potential interviewees, and this high rate may affect the results. The design of the semi-structured interview questions may have been a limitation. To counter this potential limitation, a pilot interview was conducted prior to data collection, with results reviewed by a team of researchers.
A further limitation to a wider applicability is that the research was conducted at a single institution (a large, research-focused university on the East coast of the United States). While we see no reason to expect that results would differ if data were collected at a different institution, this fact may affect reproducibility.
In addition, member checking was used throughout the interviews with an ongoing dialogue to ensure that the data’s meaning was interpreted correctly. Interview participants were then given the chance to review a summary of their interview data after interview completion to check for the findings’ accuracy [31]. A confirmation of accuracy was provided by 22 of the 25 participants and in three cases, minimal edits were provided.

2.4. Reliability Analysis

To ensure trustworthiness for the qualitative coding, peer debriefing was utilized [32] and a sample of the excerpts were chosen and coded by two other researchers utilizing the established codes derived from the SCCT constructs and codes that emerged throughout the data analysis process for verification [33]. This critical review aimed to ensure that key points were not missed, repeated or overemphasized [31,32].

3. Results

3.1. Learning Experiences and Future Career Interest

Several students recognized a change in interest in a future career in environmental sustainability during their time in their undergraduate programs. Bolded text in quotations are the participants’ responses. Of those students, many recognized an increase in interest after completing coursework and envisioned their future career path. Of the students interviewed, one student reported no change in interest, about half of the remaining students expressed a gradual change and the other half noted a specific change. The following three scenarios speak to the following question, “How is exposure to environmental sustainability learning experiences in undergraduate engineering courses associated with an interest in pursuing careers in an area of sustainability?”

3.1.1. Scenario 1 (3rd-Year Industrial and Systems Engineering Major)

Interviewer: Did you have any interest in pursuing an environmental sustainability career before starting your undergraduate program?
Then followed up with the following question:
Interviewer: Has this changed since you started taking courses?
Participant: “No, I don’t think I had that much of an interest but as and then I got to know about this through the courses that I‘ve taken. And so, it’s something that we have to be very serious about. So that caught my attention.”
Participant: “It was last semester. It was last year when I was taking this course called Human Factors in economics. And that was where the first ideas of sustainability started going to me.”
The participant also indicated the following in their interview when asked what type of future career path they envisioned, their response:
Participant: “I‘m looking to concentrate more towards getting into the automobile industry. So, when I get into that I can, if I can work on the production line, make the production line gets faster. There’s probably less electricity use, there’s less wastage and even if there’s some parts that go waste, I make sure that they are recycled. And talking about the engines that cars are gonna use and think we have to make better engines because I think 20% of the 10 to 20% of the world is running on electric vehicles right now. And even though they sound very good for the environment, the way those batteries are made are just not as good.”

3.1.2. Scenario 2 (3rd-Year Aerospace Engineering Major)

In the second example, the participant identified that while taking a course, they first began to think about sustainability and then they also identified ways they may address environmental sustainability in their future career. They said that before their undergraduate years, they knew about environmental sustainability, though they did not plan on pursuing it. This student then also identified when their mindset began to change and how they may contribute to environmental sustainability in their career.
Participant: “Before coming to [university], I did, though I wasn’t as focused on pursuing it as a part of my field, but it was kind of something that education or at least, culture had imprinted upon me.”
Participant: “I would say during the past semester, this past spring, so fairly recently. I decided that instead of just pursuing the construction of aircrafts or spacecraft, so I wanted to do something that would be a little bit more helpful for the future.”
Participant: “My direct contribution will probably be ensuring that to the best of my ability, I’m designing wind turbines to impact their surroundings less, operate more efficiently, generate more power so that they can be so that not only are we approaching a more sustainable energy source, but that energy source itself gets more sustained.”
These data from this participant suggests that during their time at the university, their interest has changed and they identified how they may contribute to environmental sustainability in their future career.

3.1.3. Scenario 3 (4th-Year Biological Systems Engineering Major)

The following participant provided this response when asked if they had an interest in environmental sustainability prior to attending the university, and they responded:
Participant: “I definitely think that I had a lot of interest in the environment and the protection of it, but I don’t think until I came to [university], that those two sides really came together for me. I never took any environmental classes in high school. I had never other than my own personal experiences with nature and being in it and like family homes, farms, and things that kind of I have that kind of background. Other than that kind of exposure I had never really looked at environmental engineering as a way of life. I was always more focused on the biotech side. But I mean even coming from the background, I have seen now from [biological systems engineering]. I have seen a lot more applications, even for biotech in this kind of environmental engineering side of things and how we can bring those two together and really any engineering once again, you are gonna have an impact on the environment. It’s kind of one of those big common problems we all have to solve one of these days. So, anything you engineer always kind of has to have that in mind.”
When then asked if they could identify when this interest may have changed, they mentioned research as a part of the change in the following excerpt:
Participant: “I don’t think there was any one place where it really changed. I mean, there were a couple of different places where I saw it gradually grow more and more. I mean, I got research where I was doing looking at the effects of agriculture on groundwater. So that was one of my background things that I wasn’t expecting to get. I did a watershed class. There were a couple of different professors who had more focus on the environmental side.”
The mention of professors who had more of an environmental focus is insightful. This influential notion, as illustrated by the SCCT framework, identifies supports and barriers that students experience during their choice-making process.
This participant then identified how they could contribute to environmental sustainability in their future career:
Participant: “I’ve definitely thought about this and as far as it being my senior year, I have one more year left. I have a couple of options on the board. Part of me wants to go out west Colorado, Wyoming, work with an NGO or something. Help engineering, the national parks, that kind of stuff. Another part of me actually, my grandmother owns a small farm in South Africa. And there are certain things that have come to light where I might end up going over there for a couple of years after school and I kind of want to try and use what I’ve learned about sustainability, and the more agricultural background of what I’ve learned and possibly turn that to a sustainable Agricultural type. There’s already an Airbnb there, spend a couple of years and see what I can do, given the learning that I have in a pretty impoverished area, both in the community and just on the land that I have there.”
This excerpt suggests that the student had an interest in environmental sustainability prior to attending the university, though they also recognized that research in a watershed course may have enhanced this interest. This participant also identified how they may contribute to environmental sustainability in their future career.

3.1.4. Scenario 4 (3rd-Year Civil Engineering Major)

The following participant identified when their interest in environmental sustainability developed in the following excerpt:
Participant: “I think just like throughout my childhood my mom is always like, super big on like, making sure we like compost our like food waste instead of just throwing it in the trash and like recycling and like, like, learning water use not just because it’s cheaper, but also because like, it’s a resource, and she’s just always like, like, kind of put it in our heads to that kind of thing”.
Then, when asked if their view has changed, they responded:
Participant: “I don’t think I considered a focus on environmental sustainability; I think going into it I was just thinking of pursuing engineering and then I would find some one thing I liked along the way. My view has changed since taking the specific types of civil courses, especially intro courses, like Intro to Structures and Intro to Transportation has definitely given me a better idea of possible career paths. And then also, now that I‘m starting to take a green engineering course, it’s solidified my path.”
This quote is insightful as it describes the impact of introductory courses. The student recognized that the courses were not environment-specific, also aligning with student responses signifying the exposure and impact to environmental sustainability they also experienced in the engineering foundation courses.
This participant also described how they envision their future career path:
Participant: “The path I’m going now, probably alternate modes of transportation and reducing the amount of people who use cars all the time and improving the bus systems and bike lanes, areas like that.”
Of the participants mentioned who could identify that a change in interest in environmental sustainability occurred, one student was able to identify a particular semester when the change took place, while the other students recognized a gradual increase over time since attending the university. It was also mentioned that the professor’s focus on environmental sustainability made a difference.
Although the data identify differences in a change in interest and when this may have occurred, each of the participants identified some type of change in interest since attending the university, along with detailed descriptions of their future career in environmental sustainability.
The students identified environmental sustainability predispositions they acquired prior to beginning their undergraduate engineering programs, identifying background and environmental influences. The students began their undergraduate engineering programs with varying backgrounds and interests in the area of environmental sustainability and the level of exposure also varied by participant. It is clear from the data that some students were already exposed to environmental sustainability. For example, one participant mentioned learning about maintaining the environment while in the role of a camp counselor, learning about how humans and nature intermingle. Likewise, another participant talked about their experience in Boy Scouts when they learned about erosion and runoff and yet another participant mentioned an impactful volunteer experience at a camp, growing their interest in environmental sustainability.
Participants identified a gamut of interests and ways that they could address environmental sustainability with their future engineering degree, in contexts such as improving life quality. The students identified topics such as designing environmentally friendly medical devices, pollution reduction, land and water preservation, renewable energy areas such as hydroelectric power, solar energy and wind power, manufacturing processes, environmental data collection from satellites and recyclables to name a few, highlighting the interdisciplinary locus of environmental sustainability.
Data acquired from one participant revealed a connection between exposure to environmental sustainability prior to college, then in introductory courses and a potential career path in environmental sustainability. The participants shared that they were exposed to composting and recycling during their childhood, then exposed to environmental sustainability during coursework, specifically during civil introductory courses. This student also expressed that they would like to work on alternative modes of transportation in their future career.
The importance of financial rewards while emphasizing making a difference was mentioned. Although not a common trend found in this research, this participant also expressed that they may be willing to accept a position which pays less if the tradeoff is meaningful work, “I know this is gonna sound really bad, but I mean, money is the driving factor and all of that, but at the same time, I’d rather have a job that I know that I’m making an impact in and take a pay cut for it, you know, and so, I think as long as I walk at the end of my career, and I retire as long as I can look back and say that I made an actual impact, a good impact on the world, then I’d be more than happy”, demonstrating an intrinsic connection to career success. This view demonstrates that many of the students identified a successful career as one that provides a monetary reward also while contributing to the greater good.

3.2. Findings

Each student interviewed had some level of interest in sustainability, which was derived from different types of learning experiences, at times occurring during their pre-college years along with experiences during their undergraduate years. In addition, multiple students could identify ways in which they would like to address sustainability issues in their careers, though both monetary rewards and intrinsic rewards were both mentioned.
All twenty-five students interviewed indicated they believe engineers can address environmental sustainability issues, also displaying their own confidence in their personal impact. They identified ways in which they, as future engineers, may contribute to an area of environmental sustainability. The students mentioned areas such as hydroelectric power, solar energy and wind power, manufacturing processes, environmental data collection from satellites and recyclables. In addition to monetary reward considerations, the students also expressed that making a positive contribution is important in their future careers. There may be a misperception that a career in environmental sustainability may be less financially lucrative than other engineering disciplines.
In terms of learning experiences, some students mentioned pre-college exposure through camps, Boy Scouts or self-directed learning. Academic learning experiences were impactful, as students mentioned various undergraduate courses where they have been exposed. The Introduction to Green Engineering course was specifically stated, though many students recognized the integration of environmental sustainability elements into other courses through videos, discussions of current events, guest speakers and projects. Internships expose students to real-life aspects of sustainability initiatives, oftentimes leading to a future position within the company.
Most students expressed a personal desire to contribute to an environmental sustainability cause in their future careers, though some acknowledged that at this point in their undergraduate studies, they were unsure exactly how they would do so. Many felt that they could make a positive impact in the world by contributing, seeing it as a noteworthy factor in their career aspirations. This is promising because engineers are trained problem solvers and future engineers would be excellent candidates to tackle sustainability-related issues.
The change or progression of interest in environmental sustainability differed amongst participants, ranging from little interest to some interest when students began their undergraduate years. The evolution was documented with the following three examples:
Scenario 1: This student arrived at the university with little interest in environmental sustainability, an interest started to blossom while taking courses and now the student envisions contributing to environmental sustainability with a future career in the automobile industry.
Scenario 2: In this instance, this student knew about environmental sustainability before starting their undergraduate program, but there was no plan to pursue it. They began taking courses and their mindset began to change. They now intend to contribute to an environmental sustainability initiative by designing efficient wind turbines in their future career.
Scenario 3: This student did have a slight interest in the environment prior to arriving to campus but did not make a connection until attending the university. Their interest increased after taking some courses and they plan to work on improving alternative modes of transportation after graduation.
Scenario 4: In this instance, pre-college and familial experiences were impactful, then coursework had a striking effect.
Overall, a combination of pre-college experiences, academic coursework, extracurriculars and internships all influenced students’ career choices in this field. Although family influence was insignificant, informal conversations amongst family members may have sparked some interest in the area. The students recognized the important roles that their peers, professors and mentors each play in shaping their future career path.
The results from this study imply that exposing students to environmental sustainability concepts in engineering programs does appear to inform students of opportunities and ways they may personally contribute after graduation.

4. Discussion

Information gathered from this study sheds light on students’ interests in environmental sustainability and future career interests. These data may lead to the deliberate development of a curriculum that supports additional environmental sustainability initiatives. During the interviews, the students identified impactful learning experiences during their undergraduate years which influenced their interest to pursue a career in environmental sustainability. This research is important partly because societally we have experienced a shift since the pandemic began, transforming how people work, why they work and where they work. The Great Reshuffle, as it has been referred to by LinkedIn:
“is an unprecedented moment in history where we are reimagining the future of work. People are actively acquiring new skills and pursuing new ventures and employers are reinventing business models and creating new markets. This upheaval, which typically may play out over the course of decades, is being compressed into a couple of years”.
[34]
Amid this great career reshuffle, along with the COVID-19 pandemic and the current climate crisis, we are faced with an opportunity to transition our society to a green economy, addressing the climate change warning. Achieving collective global climate targets is a colossal challenge and the undertaking is going to require a shared effort to make it happen. Our current undergraduate engineering students identified opportunities in which they can be change agents and contribute towards tackling these monumental global climate initiatives. The results from this study provide insight into dynamics that inspire career choices. The students’ learning experiences may provide exposure to global issues that need solutions. Factors identified in this study could be considered and integrated into future environmental sustainability research, outreach and initiatives. Engineering educators can expose students to environmental sustainability learning experiences within their curricula, which could result in an increased interest in pursuing a career in environmental sustainability [35]. These experiences could be shared amongst other engineering education communities to promote integrating environmental sustainability in their curriculum.
There are many contributing factors considered when considering a career. Overall, the students mentioned that a combination of pre-college experiences, self-directed learning and formal academic experiences have shaped their paths toward embracing environmental sustainability and choosing their future career path. This emphasizes the value of a well-rounded approach to sustainability education, integrating real-world exposure with personal interest and structured academic learning [36]. The learning journey is an active process, acquiring information and integrating it with existing knowledge acquired along the way and it may be inferred that precollege exposure to hands-on outdoor experiences is impactful on learning and may also develop future career interests [37].
Collectively, the students recognized that there are multiple ways to address environmental sustainability issues in their future careers, regardless of their engineering major. It is inspiring to witness students actively thinking about creating solutions for environmental sustainability issues. The students connected their interests [38], exposure and potential career paths to environmental sustainability. The results from this study indicate that the students want to make a difference in the world. The students in this study expressed that, although having a job is important, they would like a job that aligns with their personal values. As future contributors, the students have an awareness of the importance of environmental sustainability and they would like to be a part of environmental sustainability solutions. As expressed by one participant, knowledge of environmental sustainability can be versatile and this student is hopeful that they can practically apply their knowledge to have a lasting impact. The vision of the participants is inspiring; they are thinking about their place in the career world in the context of environmental sustainability.
In an observation worth detailing, many students were able to identify how they may contribute, though they did not see a clear path to do so. This may be because the students are at different points in their undergraduate programs and some of them still have time before they begin their post-graduation career search or they have not decided. Either way, these results present an opportunity for university undergraduate engineering programs to increase exposure to sustainability-focused engineering profession-related topics.
Although the undergraduate students interviewed in this study are motivated to make a difference in the world, money is still on their minds. While acknowledging money as a portion of success, most of the undergraduate students interviewed would like to employ their passions in their future careers in some way.
“Economic motivation is an impulse that arises from within to increase financial or financial needs” [39]. While interviewing a group of university students, aged 21–22, Nilan et al. (2019) found that higher salaries may outweigh other motivations. In contrast, another participant expressed that financial stability is an expectation after graduating with an engineering degree and pursuing their first post-graduation career. A similar trend was found that students may also have other motivations, meshed along with their financial considerations, revealing that “at the personal level, they were also concerned about under-employment, low income, low social status and family disappointment if they did not maximize the benefits of their degree in environmental engineering” [40].
The view of future monetary rewards aligned with most participants, indicating that they would like to address environmental sustainability issues in their careers while being compensated accordingly. This may also signal that students feel that the opportunity for an engineer to work for the betterment of society may be at a financial disadvantage, which may be a misconception about a career in sustainability.
“By integrating sustainability into their curricula, universities can educate and raise awareness of the importance of sustainability among students and the broader community” [41]. When considering SDGs, universities have an opportunity to contribute by providing exposure for students through integrated learning experiences, which may ultimately impact national and international policymaking as these students become future leaders [42]. “An effective sustainability curriculum is deliberately constructed with the aim to graduate students with the capacities to be effective systemic change agents” [43]. By making the SDGs an intentional part of the curriculum, students may be more open to address sustainability issues in their careers [40].

5. Conclusions

The multifaceted nature of students’ career choices in environmental sustainability is an undeniable reality. A student’s decision-making process is clearly influenced by many factors, each playing a distinct role. The influences motivating students to pursue careers in environmental sustainability are complex and this study illuminated several key aspects that play a role in shaping students’ career decisions. In particular, the students considered personal values, environmental sustainability learning experiences and monetary gains when thinking about a future career in environmental sustainability. There may be a misperception present that a career in environmental sustainability will not yield a satisfying monetary gain.
The exploratory evidence indicates that there is room for further research in this area. Although the results from this study did not indicate that learning experiences were the only factors that contributed to student career interests, the results did reflect that exposure to environmental sustainability in various settings did spark or increase an interest. In the undergraduate educational setting, the knowledge gained and opportunities encountered contributed to the student’s inclination towards considering a future career in environmental sustainability. The students could also connect their future engineering degree and how it could be used to tackle environmental sustainability issues. The data revealed that students do see themselves as engineers, paired with adequate corresponding salaries while making a difference. The students have a desire to make a difference in the world, though money was a factor in most cases. This essential notion reflects the student’s enthusiasm and willingness to work on environmental sustainability issues if they are adequately compensated for their efforts.
Although the students may find a future career addressing any of the 17 SDGs, in particular, engineering graduates may pursue work in areas such as climate action (SDG13), affordable and clean energy (SDG7), sustainable cities and communities (SDG11), responsible consumption and protection (SDG12), life below water (SDG14), life on land (SDG15) and partnerships for the goals (SDG17) in their future careers.
Some practical implications for course designers include curriculum enhancement expanded interdisciplinary approaches and experiential learning opportunities. Course designers are key participants in preparing undergraduate engineering students for careers in environmental sustainability by designing alluring, pertinent and stimulating learning experiences that inspire students’ interests. By using the findings of this study as a guide for curriculum design, course designers can play a role in building a more sustainable future. Future research will be beneficial to support the development of new strategies, including and beyond learning experiences, to encourage students to address sustainability-related issues in their future careers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G.; methodology, T.G.; formal analysis, T.G.; data curation, T.G.; investigation, T.G.; resources, T.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G.; writing—review and editing, T.G., K.R., D.K., A.K. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

It was determined that this activity is not research involving human subjects as defined by HHS and FDA regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Apollo, A.; Mbah, M.F. Challenges and opportunities for climate change education (Cce) in East Africa: A critical review. Climate 2021, 9, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Roscini, F. UN Research Shows Climate Change is “a Code Red for Humanity”; Global Development Policy Center: Boston, MA, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2021/10/22/un-research-shows-climate-change-is-a-code-red-for-humanity/ (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  3. Cook, J.; Nuccitelli, D.; Green, S.A.; Richardson, M.; Winkler, B.; Painting, R.; Way, R.; Jacobs, P.; Skuce, A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 2, 024024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.G.-K.; Plattner, M.M.B.; Tignor, S.K.; Allen, J.; Boschung, A.; Nauels, Y.; Bex, X.V.; Midgley, P.M. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Students’ Evaluations about Climate Change; Lombardi, D., Brandt, C.B., Bickel, E.S., Burg, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meadows, D.H.; Meadows, D.L.; Randers, J.; Behrens, W. The Limits to Growth; Universe Books: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meadows, D.; Randers, J.; Meadows, D. The Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update; Earthscan: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Ruijven, B.J.; De Cian, E.; Sue Wing, I. Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Q. Interlinking climate change with water-energy-food nexus and related ecosystem processes in California case studies. Ecol. Process. 2016, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Larson, P.D.; Larson, N.M. The Hunger of Nations: An empirical study of inter-relationships among the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 12, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pradhan, P.; Costa, L.; Rybski, D.; Lucht, W.; Kropp, J.P. A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth’s Future 2017, 5, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biancardi, A.; Colasante, A.; D’Adamo, I.; Daraio, C.; Gastaldi, M.; Uricchio, A.F. Strategies for developing sustainable communities in higher education institutions. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McHugh, L.H.; Lemos, M.C.; Morrison, T.H. Risk? Crisis? Emergency? Implications of the new climate emergency framing for governance and policy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 2021, 12, e736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zarestky, J.; Collins, J.C. Supporting the United Nations’ 2030 sustainable development goals: A call for international HRD action. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2017, 20, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, L.; Rudhumbu, N.; Shumba, J.; Olumide, A. Role of higher education institutions in the implementation of sustainable development goals. In Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schaub, M.; Tokar, D.M. The role of personality and learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. J. Vocat. Behav. 2005, 66, 304–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilson, D. Exploring the intersection between engineering and sustainability education. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pallant, E.; Choate, B.; Haywood, B. How do you teach undergraduate university students to contribute to UN SDGs 2030? In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  18. Negm, A.M.; Rizk, R.Y.; Abdel-Kader, R.F.; Ahmed, A. (Eds.) Engineering Solutions Toward Sustainable Development: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering Solutions Toward Sustainable Development; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ensign, M. Let’s Train ‘Extension Agents’ for the 21st Century. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2017. Available online: https://www.chronicle.com/article/lets-train-extension-agents-for-the-21st-century/ (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  20. Byrne, E.P.; Desha, C.J.; Fitzpatrick, J.J.; Hargroves, C.K. Exploring sustainability themes in engineering accreditation and curricula. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2013, 14, 384–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hajer, M.; Nilsson, M.; Raworth, K.; Bakker, P.; Berkhout, F.; de Boer, Y.; Rockstrom, J.; Ludwig, K.; Kok, M. Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brown, S.; Bornasal, F.; Brooks, S.; Martin, J.P. Civil engineering faculty incorporation of sustainability in courses and relation to sustainability beliefs. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 2015, 141, C4014005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. James, J.J.; Bixler, R.D.; Vadala, C.E. From play in nature, to recreation then vocation: A developmental model for natural history-oriented environmental professionals. Child. Youth Environ. 2010, 20, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, R.; LaMarca, N.; Rank, S.J.; Flinner, K.; Ardalan, N. Expanding high school youth’s perceptions of environmental careers and resilience development through conservation education. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 2021, 20, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thomas, I. Influences on career choice: Considerations for the environmental profession. Environ. Pract. 2017, 19, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Katz-Gerro, T.; Greenspan, I.; Handy, F.; Lee, H.Y. The relationship between value types and environmental behaviour in four countries: Universalism, benevolence, conformity and biospheric values revisited. Environ. Values 2017, 26, 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Menon, M.; Paretti, M. Faculty Perspectives on Integrating Sustainable Development into Engineering Education. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lent, R.W. A Social Cognitive View of Career Development and Counseling. In Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 101–127. [Google Scholar]
  29. Saldana, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Stahl, N.A.; King, J.R. Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. J. Dev. Educ. 2020, 44, 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  31. Creswell, J.W. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Creswell, J.W.; Creswell, J.D. Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Janesick, V.J. Peer debriefing. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. LinkedIn Economic Graph. Global Green Skills Report 2022. 2022. Available online: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:93024 (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  35. Korte, R.; Smith, K. Portraying the Academic Experiences of Students in Engineering: Students’ Perceptions of Their Educational Experiences and Career Aspirations in Engineering. In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 27 May–1 June 2007; pp. 12–1162. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kyoung Ro, H.; Lattuca, L.R.; Alcott, B. Who Goes to Graduate School? Engineers’ Math Proficiency, College Experience, and Self-Assessment of Skills. J. Eng. Educ. 2017, 106, 98–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Temes, J. The Impacts of a Pre-College Outdoor Adventure Trip on the College Experience at the University of Colorado Boulder. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ardiyanto, J. Effect of Education Costs, Career Motivation, Family Environment on Students Interest: A Case Study of Radiological Engineering Diploma Students in Indonesia. NVEO Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils J. 2021, 8, 2249–2259. [Google Scholar]
  39. Arima, A. A plea for more education for sustainable development. Sustain. Sci. 2009, 4, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nilan, P.; Wibawanto, G.R. Career quandaries of activist environmental engineering graduates in indonesia. Environ. Educ. Res. 2019, 25, 1775–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Singh, A.; Blessinger, P. Examining the Role and Challenges of Sustainable Development Goals for the Universities in the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bartlett, P.W.; Popov, M.; Ruppert, J. Integrating core sustainability meta-competencies and SDGs across the silos in curriculum and professional development. In Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ketlhoilwe, M.J.; Silo, N.; Velempini, K. Enhancing the Roles and Responsibilities of Higher Education Institutions in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. In Sustainable Development Goals and Institutions of Higher Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. UN Sustainable Development Goals, image adopted from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment (accessed on 1 February 2024). The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.
Figure 1. UN Sustainable Development Goals, image adopted from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment (accessed on 1 February 2024). The content of this publication has not been approved by the United Nations and does not reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States.
Sustainability 16 05026 g001
Figure 2. Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) construct relationships, image adopted. Copyright 1993 by R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown and G. Hackett. Reprinted by permission.
Figure 2. Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) construct relationships, image adopted. Copyright 1993 by R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown and G. Hackett. Reprinted by permission.
Sustainability 16 05026 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Griesinger, T.; Reid, K.; Knight, D.; Katz, A.; Somers, J. Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125026

AMA Style

Griesinger T, Reid K, Knight D, Katz A, Somers J. Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs. Sustainability. 2024; 16(12):5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Griesinger, Tina, Kenneth Reid, David Knight, Andrew Katz, and John Somers. 2024. "Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs" Sustainability 16, no. 12: 5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125026

APA Style

Griesinger, T., Reid, K., Knight, D., Katz, A., & Somers, J. (2024). Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs. Sustainability, 16(12), 5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop