Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Collection
2.2.1. The Location and Attributes of the Medical Facilities
2.2.2. Residents’ Microblog Check-in Data
2.2.3. The Online Score of the Facilities Service
2.3. Research Framework
2.4. Variables and Indicators
2.5. Models and Methods
2.5.1. Natural Language Processing
2.5.2. Kernel Density Estimation
2.5.3. The Entropy Weight Method
2.5.4. Multiple Regression Analysis Method
3. Results
3.1. Medical Facilities Present a Central Agglomeration Peripheral Scattered Distribution Pattern
3.2. The Intensity of Medical Facility Usage Shows a Clustering Feature in the Main City Center
3.3. The Rating Levels of Medical Facilities Exhibit Multi-Centre Distribution Characteristics
3.4. Concentration of High-Quality Medical Resources within the Central Urban Area
4. Discussion
4.1. Optimize and Improve Medical Facilities in the Main Urban Area, with a Focus on Enhancing Medical Facilities in the Peripheral Suburbs
4.2. Provide Precise Public Services Based on Supply and Demand Relationships to Maximize Facility Utilization Efficiency
4.3. Strengthen Functional Complementarity and Network Connectivity between Medical Facilities of Different Levels
4.4. Actively Guide Refinement and Improvement of Medical Facility Functions Based on the Supply–Demand Relationship of Medical Facilities
5. Conclusions
5.1. Key Findings
5.2. Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cooper, L. Location-allocation problems. Oper. Res. 1963, 11, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobson, J. A regional screening procedure for land use suitability analysis. Geogr. Rev. 1979, 69, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendib, A. Gis-based multi-criteria decision analysis for the optimal location of public facility in batna city, algeria. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2024, 52, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eklund, M.D.; Kowal, P.J.; Dupont, M.N. Evaluation of temperature-dependent critical experiments at the walthousen reactor critical facility for benchmark development. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2023, 180, 109440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Wu, W.; Peng, L.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Xiong, Y.; Bai, Y. Evaluation of urban bus service reliability on variable time horizons using a hybrid deep learning method. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 217, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Lauber, L.; Liu, H.; Shi, J.; Xie, M. Travel time prediction of urban public transportation based on detection of single routes. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bubalo, T.; Rajsman, M.; Skorput, P. Methodological approach for evaluation and improvement of quality transport service in public road passenger transport. Teh. Vjesn.-Tech. Gaz. 2022, 29, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, C.R.; Wang, Y. Research on the evaluation and influence mechanism of public housing service quality: A case study of shanghai. Sustainability 2021, 13, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Tang, C. Analysis and optimization of urban public transport lines based on multiobjective adaptive particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 16786–16798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez-Vega, R.; Santos-Peñate, D.R.; Dorta-González, P.; Rodríguez-Díaz, M. A multi-criteria GIS based procedure to solve a network competitive location problem. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsou, K.W.; Hung, Y.T.; Chang, Y.L. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 2005, 22, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin-Hsien, L.; Hsueh-Sheng, C. Exploration assessment of the service distance based on Geographical Information Systems and Space Syntax analysis on the urban public facility. In Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 28–30 December 2009; pp. 289–292. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, T.; York, S.; Primomo, J. The utilization of geographic information systems to create a site selection strategy to disseminate an older adult fall prevention program. Soc. Sci. J. 2011, 48, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Zhen, F.; Zhang, H. The Dynamic Changes of Urban Space-time Activity and Activity Zoning Based on Check-in Data in Sina Web. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2016, 35, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
- Bang, C.L.; Thomas, L.; Ping, T. Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? the case of chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Adm. Rev. 2011, 71, 718–727. [Google Scholar]
- Judge, K.; Solomon, M. Public opinion and the national health service: Patterns and perspectives in consumer satisfaction. J. Soc. Policy 1993, 22, 299–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, O.J.; De, O.R. Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transp. Sci. 2015, 49, 605–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, S.; Edberg, A.K.; Jakobsson, U.; Hallberg, I.R. Care satisfaction among older people receiving public care and service at home or in special accommodation. J. Clin. Nurs. 2013, 22, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Melo Pereira, F.A.; Ramos, A.S.M.; Gouvêa, M.A.; da Costa, M.F. Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in brazilian public organizations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 46, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quratulain, S.; Khan, A.K. Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 2015, 35, 307–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van, L.D.; El-Geneidy, A. Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res. Transp. Econ. 2016, 59, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Dewana, Z.; Fikadu, T.; Mariam, A.; Abdulahi, M. Client perspective assessment of women’s satisfaction towards labour and delivery care service in public health facilities at arba minch town and the surrounding district, gamo gofa zone, south ethiopia. Reprod. Health 2016, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubaishi, H.A.; Ali, A. The effect of public healthcare service quality on residents’ satisfaction in the united arab emirates (uae), the case of ajman emirate. Health 2022, 14, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, F.; Wang, B.; Chen, Y. China’s city network characteristics based on social network space: An empirical analysis of Sina micro-blog. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2012, 67, 1031–1043. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.K.; Lv, B.; Zhao, Y.J. A study of county public service facilities distribution assessment based on behavior investigation and gis:a case study of medical facilities in dexing. Hum. Geogr. 2015, 30, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Pellegrini, P.; Wang, H. Comparative residents’ satisfaction evaluation for socially sustainable regeneration—The case of two high-density communities in Suzhou. Land 2022, 11, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Pellegrini, P.; Xu, Y.; Ma, G.; Feng, X. Evaluating residents’ satisfaction before and after regeneration. The case of a high-density resettlement neighbourhood in Suzhou. China. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2144137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, L.; Wu, Z.; Wang, T.; Ding, K.; Chen, Y. Villagers’ satisfaction evaluation system of rural human settlement construction: Empirical study of Suzhou in China’s rapid urbanization area. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, M. Public Space Satisfaction Evaluation of New Centralized Communities in Urban Fringe Areas—A Study of Suzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 20, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glasson, J.; Wood, G. Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2009, 27, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodcraft, S. Understanding and measuring social sustainability. J. Urban Regen. Renew. 2015, 8, 133–144. [Google Scholar]
- Marta, B.; Giulia, D. Addressing social sustainability in urban regeneration processes. An application of the social multi-criteria evaluation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adelipour, M.; Hwang, H.; Kwon, D.; Kim, K.K.; Moon, J.H.; Lubman, D.M.; Kim, J. Evaluation of the effect of dimethyl fumarate on human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using bottom-up proteomics. Biochimie 2024, 221, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eickhoff-Shemek, J.A.M.; Betta, R. Conducting a risk management audit of your facility’s medical emergency action plan. ACSM’s Health Fit. J. 2024, 28, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, S.M.; Joab, R.; Bolles, K.M.; Friedman, S.; Kimmel, S.D. Ending medical complicity with skilled-nursing facility discrimination against people with opioid use disorder. Ann. Intern. Med. 2023, 176, 410–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, Y.; Lee, S.; Sung, I.; Nielsen, P.; Moon, I. Facility location-allocation problem for emergency medical service with unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 1465–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenneth, R.; Talbot, L.A.; Jeffrey, M.E.; Smith, A.L.; Michael, H.J.; Bradley, D.F. Perioperative pressure injury prevention program ina military medical treatment facility: A quality improvement project. Mil. Med. 2023, 189 (Suppl. S1), 51–56. [Google Scholar]
- Manandhar, R.; Adhikari, A.; Manandhar, N.; Jayaratnam, S. Maternal near miss at Kathmandu Medical College: An analysis of severe maternal morbidity at a Nepalese tertiary care facility. Aust. New Zealand J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023, 63, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bigné, E.; Moliner, M.A.; Sánchez, J. Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organisations: The case of spanish public services. J. Serv. Mark. 2003, 17, 420–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calnan, M.; Almond, S.; Smith, N. Ageing and public satisfaction with the health service: An analysis of recent trends. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, 57, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friman, M.; Fellesson, M. Service supply and customer satisfaction in public transportation: The quality paradox. J. Public Transp. 2009, 12, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, W.; Wang, X.; Mcgregor, S.E. Optimization of preventive health care facility locations. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2010, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia, P.B.D.M.; Raia, A.A., Jr. A comparative analysis of hospital accessibility: A study case in the municipalities of Rio Claro and Sao Carlos. urbe. Rev. Bras. Gestão Urbana 2015, 7, 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alan, W. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling: Retrospect and Prospect. Geogr. Anal. 2010, 42, 364–394. [Google Scholar]
- Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H.; Helbich, M. Spatiotemporal variability of urban growth factors: A global and local perspective on the megacity of Mumbai. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2015, 35, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halden, D. Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians. Transp. Policy 2002, 9, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Tang, Q. Planning toward Equal Accessibility to Services: A Quadratic Programming Approach. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2013, 40, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Rosenberg, M.W.; Wang, W.Y.; Yang, L.; Li, H. Aging health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing, China. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.E.; Rosenberg, M.W. Spatial access to residential care resources in Beijing, China. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2012, 11, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamtsho, S.; Corner, R.; Dewan, A. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Spatial Accessibility to Primary Health Care in Bhutan. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 1584–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Field Name | Field Explanation | Sample Data |
---|---|---|
Id | The internal serial number | 10018321328223 |
name | POI name | Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital |
address | POI address | 321 Zhongshan Road, Gulou District, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province |
Province | Province | Jiangsu Province |
City | City | Nanjing City |
Lng | Longitude | 118.789 |
Lat | Latitude | 32.063 |
Level | Facility level | the highest hospital division level in china |
Category | Facility category | medical facility |
Field Name | Field Explanation | Sample Data |
---|---|---|
Id | The user serial number | 10018321327988223 |
Lng | ‘check-in’ longitude | 118.783 |
Lat | ‘check-in’ latitude | 32.058 |
Place | ‘check-in’ address | Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital |
Label | Facilities type | Medical and health |
Comments | Residents’ comments context | Today I came to the hospital for diagnosis and the doctor told me that my body is recovering well. Many thanks to all the medical staff |
Supply–Demand Balance Index | Evaluation Level | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Low Level | Medium Level | High Level | ||
Supply level | Low level | Low level balance | Low supply–medium demand | Low supply–high demand |
Medium level | Medium supply–low demand | Medium level balance | Medium supply–high demand | |
High level | High supply–low demand | High supply–medium demand | High level balance |
Research Perspective | Specific Indicators | Researchers |
---|---|---|
Spatial accessibility | Spatial location | [4,5,9,10,18] |
Service radius | ||
Traffic convenience | ||
Facilities quality | Hospital grade | [8,13,15,23,24] |
Charges | ||
Patient size | ||
Hospitals/per capita | ||
Physician/per capita | ||
Hospital beds/per capita |
First Level Indicator | Second Level Indicator | Data Support | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|
Facility usage quality | Usage intensity | Sina microblog Microblog check-in data. | We measured the used quality using the overall strength and frequency per capita through Sina microblog ‘check-in’ data on medical facilities. |
Usage frequency | |||
Facility service evaluation | Online score | Dazhongdianping.com | We quantified the users’ network rating on dazhongdianping.com and summarize the total score (depending on the different scoring standard on different types of service facilities.) |
Experience level | Evaluation comments context | We quantified the keyword and normalized for five satisfaction levels (‘very satisfied’, ‘slightly satisfied’, ‘neutral’, ‘slightly dissatisfied’, ‘very dissatisfied’) | |
Emotion level | Emotional comments context | We extracted the emotional icon and emotional comments, quantified with five satisfaction levels (‘very positive’, ‘slightly positive’, ‘neutral’, ‘slightly negative’, ‘very negative’) |
Dependent Variable | Primary Indicators | Secondary Indicators | Basic Definition |
---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction evaluation of medical facility services | Service effectiveness | Service attitude | Satisfaction with the service attitude of medical institution staff |
Service efficiency | Satisfaction with the service efficiency of medical institution staff | ||
Service level | Service quality | Satisfaction with the service quality of medical institution staff | |
Management level | Satisfaction with service provided by medical institution management personnel | ||
Hardware facilities | Facility integrity | Subjective perception of the quality and completeness of medical devices | |
Facility progress | Subjective perception of the performance of medical devices | ||
Institutional convenience | Medical response speed | Satisfaction of medical institutions in responding to timely patient needs | |
Medical convenience level | The convenience of residents in accessing medical resources | ||
Organizational level | Organizational effectiveness of medical institutions in providing medical services | ||
Fee situation | Medical service fees | Satisfaction with the level of medical service fees | |
Drug and device charges | Satisfaction with drug and device fee levels |
Secondary Indicators | Cronbach’s Alpha Value | Standardized Cronbach’s Alpha Value |
---|---|---|
Service attitude | 0.8821 | 0.9014 |
Service efficiency | 0.8745 | 0.8901 |
Service quality | 0.7892 | 0.8191 |
Management level | 0.8135 | 0.8227 |
Facility integrity | 0.8033 | 0.8122 |
Facility progress | 0.7935 | 0.8039 |
Medical response speed | 0.8121 | 0.8237 |
Medical convenience level | 0.7731 | 0.7922 |
Organizational level | 0.7362 | 0.7576 |
Medical service fees | 0.7128 | 0.7531 |
Drug and device charges | 0.7471 | 0.7918 |
Original Comments Context | Semantic Segments | Semantic Analysis Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Second-Level Indicators | First-Level Indicators | Satisfaction Level | ||
The hospital has perfect medical conditions. The medical staff have a good attitude. And the doctors are very responsible to us. Also the operation and postoperative nursing were excellent. The whole medical treatment process is joyful and stress-free | ‘Perfect medical conditions’. | Hardware facility | Facilities quality | 5 |
‘The medical staff have a good attitude’ | Service attitude | Service evaluation | 5 | |
‘The doctors are very responsible’ | ||||
‘The operation and postoperative nursing were excellent’. | Medical quality | |||
‘The whole medical treatment process is joyful and stress-free.’ | Emotional level | Activity mood | 5 |
Evaluation Indexes | Usage Intensity | Usage Frequency | Online Score | Experience Level | Emotion Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight (W) | 0.157 | 0.166 | 0.387 | 0.196 | 0.094 |
Regression coefficient (R) | 0.825 | 0.849 | 0.922 | 0.878 | 0.814 |
Significance level (sig.) | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.008 |
X | B | SEM | Beta | T | p | VIF | R2 | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 1.545 | 3.172 | — | 0.338 | 0.626 | — | 0.807 | 25.64 (p = 0.000) |
Service attitude | 0.024 | 0.135 | 0.273 | 1.823 | 0.021 * | 3.156 | ||
Service efficiency | 0.133 | 0.116 | 0.182 | 1.762 | 0.018 ** | 2.233 | ||
Service quality | 0.017 | 0.122 | 0.353 | 1.369 | 0.010 * | 3.371 | ||
Management level | 0.175 | 0.139 | 0.311 | 1.912 | 0.026 * | 2.873 | ||
Facility integrity | 0.007 | 0.114 | 0.319 | 2.018 | 0.031 | 6.577 | ||
Facility progress | −0.067 | 0.131 | −0.174 | −2.006 | 0.036 ** | 2.361 | ||
Medical response speed | 0.021 | 0.151 | 0.277 | 1.723 | 0.022 * | 2.198 | ||
Medical convenience level | 0.014 | 0.018 | 0.219 | 1.162 | 0.028 ** | 1.221 | ||
Organizational level | 0.037 | 0.127 | 0.308 | 1.671 | 0.023 | 7.891 | ||
Medical service fees | 0.028 | 0.135 | 0.193 | 1.482 | 0.016 | 8.871 | ||
Drug and device charges | −0.021 | 0.119 | 0.239 | 1.228 | 0.027 ** | 3.577 |
Primary Indicator | Explanatory Variable | Multiple Linear Regression Model | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | T-Statistic | p-Value | ||
Service effectiveness | Service attitude | 0.024 | 0.48 | 0.002 ** |
Service efficiency | 0.133 | 1.82 | 0.001 * | |
Service level | Service quality | 0.017 | 0.39 | 0.001 ** |
Management level | −0.175 | 2.17 | 0.005 | |
Hardware facilities | Facility Progress | 0.067 | 2.61 | 0.015 |
Medical response speed | 0.021 | 3.80 | 0.003 | |
Institutional convenience | Medical convenience level | 0.018 | 2.33 | 0.002 * |
Fee situation | Drug and device charges | −0.021 | −0.37 | 0.018 |
Constant | 1.545 | 16.69 | 0.000 | |
R2 | Inter group | 0.8073 | ||
Within the group | 0.9781 | |||
Total R2 | 0.9061 | |||
Total F-statistic | 25.64 | |||
Haussmann test: Total p-value | 0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cao, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhou, L.; Ding, F.; Xu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Lu, X. Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135487
Cao Y, Wu H, Zhou L, Ding F, Xu Q, Liu Y, Xu H, Lu X. Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(13):5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135487
Chicago/Turabian StyleCao, Yang, Hao Wu, Linyi Zhou, Feng Ding, Qi Xu, Yan Liu, Hao Xu, and Xi Lu. 2024. "Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135487
APA StyleCao, Y., Wu, H., Zhou, L., Ding, F., Xu, Q., Liu, Y., Xu, H., & Lu, X. (2024). Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 16(13), 5487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135487