Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Online Communication through Social Media for Educational Purposes
2.2. Academic Writing
2.3. Social Media, Academic Writing, and the Fourth Goal of Sustainable Development
3. Research Questions
- How do post-graduate students perceive the role of social media platforms in enhancing their academic writing?
- What are the obstacles to the use of social media platforms that hinder enhancing academic writing?
4. Methodology
4.1. Participants
4.2. Research Approach
4.3. Research Procedure
4.4. Data Collection and Analysis
- What social media tools were used by you in writing the research plan?
- Which of these tools do you prefer to use? Why?
- Describe your experience using your favorite tool in some detail.
- What do you think of the use of these tools in terms of their usefulness in improving the quality of your writing of the research plan? Why?
- From your point of view, what are the disadvantages of using these tools that may negatively affect the quality of your writing of the research plan? Why?
- From your point of view, what are the obstacles to using these tools that may reduce their usefulness in improving the quality of your writing of the research plan? Why?
- Do you prefer using social media tools or traditional methods of communicating with the supervisor regarding the development of the research plan? Why?
- Familiarizing yourself with your data: The authors of the study were the interviewers. Therefore, they were very familiar with the data.
- Generating initial codes: The initial interesting codes from the data were identified. The codes were then assessed in a meaningful way regarding the research questions.
- Searching for themes: Here the analysis re-focused on the codes on a broader level, which is generating themes. In this phase, different codes are sorted into potential themes.
- Reviewing themes: The initial list of themes was refined, and some candidate themes that did not have enough data to support them were ignored.
- Defining and naming themes: In this phase, the data were defined by identifying the essence of what each theme was about and were refined by determining what aspect of the data each theme captured. Table 2 illustrates the themes and frequencies of the interview data revealed from the thematic analysis.
- Producing the report: This phase involved the final analysis under the themes and write-up of the final report. The final report of the data analysis and the concluded findings will be reviewed in the following section.
5. Findings and Discussion
6. Limitation
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Graham, L.; Berman, J.; Bellert, A. Sustainable Learning: Inclusive Practices for 21st Century Classrooms; Cambridge University Press: Sydney, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO. Incheon Declaration: Education 2030: Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Al Mulhim, E.N. Technology Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Distance Project-Based Learning Environments. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 2023, 24, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshammary, F.M.; Alhalafawy, W.S. Sustaining Enhancement of Learning Outcomes across Digital Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. J. Pos. Sch. Psyc. 2022, 6, 2279–2301. [Google Scholar]
- Ismaeel, D.A.; Al Mulhim, E.N. E-teaching Internships and TPACK during the Covid-19 Crisis: The Case of Saudi Pre-service Teachers. Int. J. Instr. 2022, 15, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vision 2030. National Transformation Program. Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/vision-2030/vrp/national-transformation-program/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Glazer, H.R.; Breslin, M.; Wanstreet, C.E. Online professional and academic learning communities: Faculty perspectives. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2013, 14, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
- Thormann, J.; Fidalgo, P. Guidelines for online course moderation and community building from a student’s perspective. J. Online Learn. Teach. 2014, 10, 374–388. [Google Scholar]
- Froment, F.; García González, A.J.; Bohórquez, M.R. The Use of Social Networks as a Communication Tool between Teachers and Students: A Literature Review. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. TOJET 2017, 16, 126–144. [Google Scholar]
- Vlachopoulos, D.; Makri, A. Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. Int. Rev. Educ. 2019, 65, 605–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habibi, A.; Mukminin, A.; Riyanto, Y.; Prasojo, L.D.; Sulistiyo, U.; Sofwan, M.; Saudagar, F. Building an online community: Student teachers’ perceptions on the advantages of using social networking services in a teacher education program. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 2018, 19, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chugh, R.; Ruhi, U. Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Edu. Info. Tech. 2018, 23, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faramarzi, S.; Tabrizi, H.H.; Chalak, A. Telegram: An instant messaging application to assist distance language learning. Teach. Engl. Technol. 2019, 19, 132–147. [Google Scholar]
- Aghajani, M.; Adloo, M. The Effect of Online Cooperative Learning on Students’ Writing Skills and Attitudes through Telegram Application. Int. J. Instr. 2018, 11, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- VanDoorn, G.; Eklund, A.A. Face to Facebook: Social media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, synchronous communication. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2013, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Northey, G.; Bucic, T.; Chylinski, M.; Govind, R. Increasing student engagement using asynchronous learning. J. Mark. Educ. 2015, 37, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewey, J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process; D.C. Heath & Co Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Piaget, J. The Psychology of the Child; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Vygotsky, L. Mind in Society; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Kelm, O.R. Social media: It’s what students do. Bus. Commun. Q. 2011, 74, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churcher, K.; Downs, E.; Tewksbury, D. “Friending” Vygotsky: A Social Constructivist Pedagogy of Knowledge Building through Classroom Social Media Use. J. Eff. Teach. 2014, 14, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
- Schrader, D.E. Constructivism and Learning in the Age of Social Media: Changing Minds and Learning Communities. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2015, 144, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akpan, V.I.; Igwe, U.A.; Mpamah, I.B.I.; Okoro, C.O. Social constructivism: Implications on teaching and learning. Br. J. Edu. 2020, 8, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Buriro, G.A.; Charan, A.A. Social media tools at developing academic writing skills. UICELL Conf. Proc. 2018, 2, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, C.E.; Ritter, N.L.; Fowler, R.M.; Franks, A.D. Developing a community of academic writers: Using social media to support academic accountability, motivation, and productivity. J. Lit. Technol. 2019, 20, 61–96. [Google Scholar]
- Seneviratne, L.C. An Intervention Using Digital Social Media to Support Academic Writing of University Students: A case study. Available online: https://research.usq.edu.au/download/18d93bd589ccde0d3b5b95e600ee9d06efbd1d9a943116acbc0a780f5856e943/3486702/Seneviratne_2018_whole.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2023).
- Zheng, B. Social Media and Classroom Writing: Participation, Interaction, and Collaboration. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/f69e557a16831d2576ba1fc607fde189/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750 (accessed on 27 July 2023).
- Sun, Y.C. Extensive writing in foreign-language classrooms: A blogging approach. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2010, 47, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsamadani, H.A. The Effectiveness of Using Online Blogging for Students’ Individual and Group Writing. Int. Educ. Stud. 2018, 11, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeboah, J.; Ewur, G.D. The impact of WhatsApp messenger usage on students performance in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana. J. Educ. Pract. 2014, 5, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
- Abdul Fattah, S.F.E.S.A. The Effectiveness of Using WhatsApp Messenger as One of Mobile Learning Techniques to Develop Students’ Writing Skills. J. Educ. Pract. 2015, 6, 115–127. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, W.C.; Yang, S.C. Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. Engl. Teach. Pract. Crit. 2011, 10, 88–103. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Chu, S.K.; Ki, W.W.; Woo, M.M. Using a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy to facilitate collaborative writing among Chinese primary school students. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2012, 28, 159–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, M.M.; Chu SK, W.; Li, X. Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2013, 61, 279–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baishya, D.; Maheshwari, S. WhatsApp Groups in Academic Context: Exploring the Academic Uses of WhatsApp Groups among the Students. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2020, 11, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, M.Z.; Alradhi, H.I.; Alhumaidi, A.A.; Alshaikh, K.H.; AlObaid, A.M.; Alhashim, M.T.; AlSheikh, M.H. Telegram as a tool to supplement online medical education during COVID-19 crisis. Acta Inform. Med. 2020, 28, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suárez-Lantarón, B.; Deocano-Ruíz, Y.; García-Perales, N.; Castillo-Reche, I.S. The Educational Use of WhatsApp. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yılmazsoy, B.; Kahraman, M.; Köse, U. Negative Aspects of Using Social Networks in Education: A Brief Review on WhatsApp Example. J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn. 2020, 3, 69–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revere, L.; Kovach, J.V. Online Technologies for Engaged Learning A Meaningful Synthesis for Educators. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2011, 12, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
- González-Padilla, D.A.; Tortolero-Blanco, L. Social media influence in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2020, 46, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Global Education Monitoring Report Team (UNESCO). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education: A Tool on whose Terms? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Al Mulhim, E.N.; Zaky, Y.A.M. Sustainability in E-Learning: E-Books and Academic Procrastination among Secondary Students. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fülöp, M.T.; Breaz, T.O.; Topor, I.D.; Ionescu, C.A.; Dragolea, L.L. Challenges and perceptions of e-learning for educational sustainability in the “new normality era”. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1104633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prasetyanto, D.; Rizki, M.; Sunitiyoso, Y. Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class? Sustainability 2022, 14, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geith, C.; Vignare, K. Access to Education with Online Learning and Open Educational Resources: Can they Close the Gap? On. Lear. 2019, 12, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobaih, A.E.E.; Moustafa, M.A.; Ghandforoush, P.; Khan, M. To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Com. Hum. Behav. 2016, 58, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic Data | n | Percentages | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Males | 4 | 40% |
Females | 6 | 60% | |
Age range | 22–27 years old | 8 | 80% |
28–31 years old | 2 | 20% | |
Specialization in Masters | Educational Technology | 10 | 100% |
Specialization in Bachelor’s degree | Science | 1 | 10% |
Math | 2 | 20% | |
Computer Sciences | 4 | 40% | |
Arabic | 1 | 10% | |
Early Childhood | 1 | 10% | |
Social Studies | 1 | 10% |
Main Themes | Sub Themes | Frequency | Percentages |
---|---|---|---|
Social media tools | 7 | 70% | |
Microsoft Teams | 4 | 40% | |
Zoom | 3 | 30% | |
2 | 20% | ||
Telegram | 1 | 10% | |
Blackboard | 1 | 10% | |
Benefits | Easy communication | 7 | 70% |
Transcending the limits of space | 6 | 60% | |
Instant feedback | 5 | 50% | |
Repeat review files | 5 | 50% | |
Interactive guidance | 5 | 50% | |
Save time and effort | 5 | 50% | |
File and resource sharing | 5 | 50% | |
Transcending the limits of time | 4 | 40% | |
Diverse file format | 3 | 30% | |
Communicate experienced researchers | 3 | 30% | |
Favorite method of holding meetings | Distance | 6 | 60% |
Blended | 4 | 40% | |
Obstacles | Technical problems | 5 | 50% |
Poor face-to-face communication skills | 3 | 30% | |
Distracting | 3 | 30% | |
Lack of technical skills | 1 | 10% | |
Burden | 1 | 10% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al Mulhim, E.N.; Ismaeel, D.A. Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135587
Al Mulhim EN, Ismaeel DA. Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing. Sustainability. 2024; 16(13):5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135587
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl Mulhim, Ensaf Nasser, and Dina Ahmed Ismaeel. 2024. "Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135587
APA StyleAl Mulhim, E. N., & Ismaeel, D. A. (2024). Learning Sustainability: Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Social Media Platforms to Enhance Academic Writing. Sustainability, 16(13), 5587. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135587