Next Article in Journal
Patterns of Soil Stoichiometry Driven by Mixed Tree Species Proportions in Boreal Forest
Next Article in Special Issue
Recovery and Restructuring of Fine and Coarse Soil Fractions as Earthen Construction Materials
Previous Article in Journal
The Correlation between Knowledge of Food Sustainability, Sustainable Eating Attitudes, and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet among Blue- and White-Collar Employees
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Biopolymers on the Water Retention Capacity of Stabilized Sand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Feasibility of Using Ferronickel Slag as a Sustainable Alternative Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt

by
Lisley Madeira Coelho
1,*,†,
Antônio Carlos Rodrigues Guimarães
1,†,
Claudio Rafael Cicuto Landim Alves Moreira
1,
Graziella Pereira Pires dos Santos
1,†,
Sergio Neves Monteiro
2 and
Pedro Henrique Poubel Mendonça da Silveira
2
1
Department of Fortification and Construction, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
2
Department of Materials Science, Military Institute of Engineering-IME, Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8642; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198642
Submission received: 30 August 2024 / Revised: 19 September 2024 / Accepted: 1 October 2024 / Published: 6 October 2024

Abstract

:
Ferronickel slag (FNS) is a byproduct produced during ferronickel alloy manufacturing, primarily used in the manufacturing of stainless steel and iron alloys. This material is produced by cooling molten slag with water or air, posing significant disposal challenges, as improper storage in industrial yards can lead to environmental contamination. This study investigates the chemical and mineralogical characteristics of reduction ferronickel slag (RFNS) and its potential use as an alternative aggregate in hot mix asphalt (HMA). The research is based on the practical application of HMA containing RFNS in an experimental area, specifically the parking lot used by buses transporting employees of Anglo American, located at the Codemin Industrial Unit in Niquelândia, Goiás, Central Brazil. Chemical analysis revealed that RFNS primarily consists of MgO, Fe2O3, and SiO2, which are elements with minimal environmental impact. The lack of significant calcium content minimizes concerns about expansion issues commonly associated with calcium-rich slags. The X-ray diffractogram indicates a predominantly crystalline structure with minerals like Laihunite and Magnetite, which enhances wear and abrasion resistance. HMA containing 40% RFNS was tested using the Marshall methodology, and a small experimental area was subsequently constructed. The HMA containing RFNS met regulatory specifications and technological controls, achieving an average resilient modulus value of 6323 MPa. Visual inspections conducted four years later confirmed that the pavement remained in excellent condition, validating RFNS as a durable and effective alternative aggregate for asphalt mixtures. The successful application of RFNS not only demonstrates its potential for local road paving near industrial areas but also underscores the importance of sustainable waste management solutions. This research highlights the value of academia–industry collaboration in advancing environmentally responsible practices and reinforces the contribution of RFNS to enhancing local infrastructure and promoting a more sustainable future.

1. Introduction

In recent years, growing attention to environmental preservation has underscored the importance of recycling industrial byproducts. Industries such as steel and metallurgy face the challenge of managing the waste generated during the production of iron, steel, and other metal alloys [1,2,3]. Leading companies in the ferronickel sector, such as Anglo American and Votorantim Metais, play a key role in managing these waste products. In Brazil, Anglo American has consolidated its nickel and iron ore production operations into a unified structure with notable facilities in Barro Alto and Codemin, located in Barro Alto and Niquelândia (GO), respectively. The Codemin facility in Niquelândia, operational since 1982, is the oldest of Anglo American’s operations in the country, while production at Barro Alto began in 2011. Together, these facilities produce approximately 40,000 tons of ferronickel annually [4,5].
Ferronickel production involves several key stages, including ore preparation (crushing, homogenization, and drying), calcination, reduction, and refining. During the reduction phase, ferronickel is obtained, which is then sent to refining to remove impurities like sulfur and phosphorus. After this, the alloy is ready for commercial use, primarily in the stainless steel industry. Both the reduction and refining processes generate slag as a byproduct.
Ferronickel slag (FNS) aggregate, a co-product of this process, is produced by cooling molten slag with water or air. However, the large amounts of waste generated pose significant disposal challenges. Industries often store these materials in industrial yards, which can lead to severe environmental contamination over time [6,7,8,9]. It is important to highlight that the properties of ferronickel slag do not follow a general rule. Therefore, for each new deposit, its properties must be determined, as they may vary depending on the origin and the beneficiation method of the ore [10]. The chemical composition of FNS, which includes oxides like Fe2O3, SiO2, and CaO, is similar to that of common Portland cement components and thus has been the subject of several studies investigating its use in concrete [6,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
While steel and blast furnace slags have been extensively evaluated as recycled mineral additions, such as railway ballast [21,22,23,24], in pavement bases or sub-bases [25,26,27,28,29,30,31], or in surface layers of hot mix asphalt (HMA) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], FNS remains underexplored in pavement engineering. In one study, Liu et al. [41] confirmed greater adhesion of bitumen to the surface of slags compared to limestone aggregates due to their porous structures, which provided a larger infiltration interface for the asphalt mortar. Further, it was found that amine and amide N–H stretching vibrations and SiO–H stretching vibrations led to chemical reactions between the asphalt and steel slag aggregate, which could improve the adhesion performance between the asphalt and steel slag aggregate. Hasita et al. [42] compared the mechanical performance of the mixture with different aggregate sizes from limestone, granite, and steel slag. The results showed that the Marshall stability of slag asphalt was 46.5% and 50% higher than limestone and granite asphalt, respectively, which was due to the lower Los Angeles abrasion and aggregate crushing value of the steel slag in comparison to limestone and could improve the deformation resistance of the asphalt concrete. The resilient modulus improved due to the higher void mineral aggregate content of the slag asphalt mixture. High voids in mineral aggregate content can cause mixtures to have higher deformation resistance and higher strength, enabling higher stress absorption before failure. Further, a higher rutting resistance (43.2%) was observed due to the rougher and stronger aggregates of the steel slag [42]. Masoudi et al. [35] investigated the effect of slag aggregate on the mechanical performance of warm mix asphalt and found that warm mix asphalt containing slag aggregates was less susceptible to aging in comparison to HMA with limestone aggregates.
Recent studies have shown increasing interest in using FNS as an alternative material in pavement construction, particularly in bases and sub-bases, due to its low susceptibility to expansion and its predominant composition of MgO, Fe2O3, and SiO2, which are elements that do not pose significant environmental risks when exposed to the environment [43,44,45,46,47]. Despite this, the application of FNS in asphalt mixtures remains limited [48,49,50].
In this context, evaluating the feasibility of using FNS as an alternative aggregate in HMA offers new possibilities for industrial waste management while highlighting the critical role of academia–industry collaboration in developing environmentally sustainable solutions. Furthermore, employing FNS near production sites can provide economic and environmental advantages, such as lower transportation costs and the paving of unpaved roads, reducing the need for natural aggregate extraction and promoting a more sustainable approach.
This study aims to analyze the chemical and mineralogical properties of reduction ferronickel slag (RFNS) from the reduction process at the Codemin Industrial Unit of Anglo American. Additionally, this study will evaluate the feasibility of RFNS as an alternative aggregate in HMA, based on a practical application in an experimental area located in the bus parking area of the Codemin facility. The objective is to demonstrate the effectiveness of RFNS in paving local roads near industrial areas, presenting it as a viable solution to the challenges associated with managing waste generated from iron production processes.

2. Materials and Methods

The waste sample was evaluated through a series of tests to assess its physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties, as well as to verify the feasibility of its application in paving. Figure 1 presents a flowchart outlining the sequence of tests and characterizations performed. In addition to detailing the tests conducted on the waste materials, the flowchart provides a step-by-step guide to the entire process, from the production of the HMA to its application in the experimental area, followed by subsequent inspection. Each stage will be explained in the following subsections, offering a comprehensive understanding of the procedures involved.

2.1. Raw Materials

In this research, RFNS samples were collected from the Barro Alto unit, operated by Anglo American, Santa Genoveva, Goiânia, in the State of Goiás, Brazil. Figure 2 shows the visual aspect of the RFNS studied in this work.
The stone aggregates used in this study are crushed limestone subdivided into the following fractions: gravel 1, gravel 0, and dust, as shown in Figure 3. The asphalt binder used is a petroleum asphalt cement (PAC) 50/70 type binder.

2.2. Physical Characterization

Granulometric analysis of the stone aggregates and RFNS was carried out according to Brazilian standards [51], using the sieving method. In addition, density [52], absorption [53], adhesiveness [54], triton impact [55] and Los Angeles abrasion [56] tests were performed on the stone aggregates.
The PAC 50/70 was characterized using conventional penetration tests [57], softening point [58], brookfield viscosity [59], flash point [60], and ductility [61], conducted before and after the RTFOT test [62].

2.3. Mineralogical, Chemical, and Environmental Characterization of the RFNS

2.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX)

The samples were morphologically analyzed by SEM using the QUANTA FEG 250 microscope, manufactured by FEI (Czech Republic). The samples were coated with gold utilizing a Leica ACE600 high-vacuum coating chamber. Both belonging to the electron microscopy laboratory (LME) of the military institute of engineering—(IME), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. SEM analysis was performed using the following parameters: electron beam power of 20 kV, working distance ranging between 10.5 and 13 mm, a spot size of 5, and image magnification at 40 and 150×, utilizing the secondary electron detector. For EDX analysis, a detector from the manufacturer Bruker was employed, coupled to the microscope column.

2.3.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

To perform the XRD analysis, the samples were inserted into a monocrystalline silicon substrate. The analysis was performed using the X’Pert Pro MRD System from PANalytical with Cobalt K α radiation (1.789 Å), at a scan speed of 4°/min, power of 40 mA × 40 kV, and scanning range from 20° to 55°. The tests were conducted in line focus configuration, using the X’Pert Data Collector software, version 2.2j (2010), to input the equipment’s operating parameters. The diffraction data was processed using the X’Pert HighScore Plus software, version 2.0a (2004).

2.3.3. Optical Microscopy (OM)

Olympus optical microscope, model BX53M, with Olympus digital camera, model, and Olympus LCMicro image acquisition and analysis software, installed in the Metallography Laboratory of the IME, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A 40× magnification in dark field mode was employed to observe the physical characteristics of the RFNS sample.

2.3.4. Environmental Analysis

For the environmental characterization, leaching and solubility tests were conducted according to the guidelines of NBR 10004 [63], using samples provided by Anglo American company, located in the city of Niquelândia, Goiás, Brazil.

2.4. Dosage

In order to investigate the incorporation of RFNS into HMA, the Marshall methodology guidelines were used, as prescribed by DNER standard 043 [64], to determine the appropriate mix of HMA containing RFNS. The dosage aimed to meet the specifications of technical standard DNIT 031 [65], with gradation falling within range C, to constitute a bearing layer in flexible pavement.

2.5. Experimental Area

Following the laboratory dosage and verification of the volumetric and mechanical properties, based on Marshall dosage criteria, a small experimental area was constructed in 2013. This experimental area involved paving the parking lot used by the buses transporting employees of Anglo American, situated at the Codemim Industrial Unit in Niquelândia, Goiás, Central Brazil. Figure 4 presents the location map of the site, while Figure 5 illustrates the condition of the parking lot prior to the commencement of the work.
During the experimental monitoring phase, resilience modulus (RM) tests were performed on specimens extracted from the paved section. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Brazilian standard DNIT 135 [66].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical Evaluation (Ferronickel Slag and Virgin Aggregates)

The granulometry of gravel 1, gravel 0, stone dust, cement, and ferronickel slag was analyzed in the physical assessment, as shown in Table 1.
Table 2 shows the physical parameters used to characterize the materials analyzed. The parameters considered were real density, apparent density, absorption, adhesiveness, Treton impact, and Los Angeles abrasion.
In Table 2, gravel 1 and gravel 0 showed close actual densities, with values of 2.82 g / cm 3 and 2.88 g / cm 3 , respectively, and both showed satisfactory adhesion. RFNS required the addition of DOPE to achieve satisfactory adhesiveness, as well as a higher actual density of 3.3 g / cm 3 . The high density of slag is a result of the abundance of iron in its chemical composition, as pointed out by Balbo and Silva [67,68]. The low absorption of the slag (0.1%) is due to the absence of pores in the nickel–iron slag, as was observed through its glassy appearance in the Optical Microscopy test. This was a preponderant factor, as it favored low binder absorption.

3.2. Asphalt Binder

The properties of the 50/70 binder used in the mix are described in Table 3 and comply with the limits established by the Brazilian standard DNIT 095 [69].

3.3. Mineralogical, Chemical, and Environmental Analysis of Ferronickel Slag

3.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX)

Figure 6 illustrates the SEM image of the sample fraction, with a magnification degree of 40 and 150×, respectively. It is possible to identify that the surface of the grains is smooth with an absence of pores, that there are some fissures, and that their shape can be interpreted as irregular.
The EDX analysis of the ferronickel slag indicated the presence of the following elements and their respective percentages: O (38.35%), Si (20.16%), Mg (17.14%), Fe (15.79%), C (5.54%), Al (1.96%), and Cr (1.05%), as illustrated in Figure 7. The chemical composition of the ferronickel slag aggregate was then verified, revealing that it primarily consists of MgO, Fe2O3, and SiO2, which are elements that do not pose significant environmental risks. It is well established that the hydration reaction between calcium oxides and magnesium oxides can contribute to the expansion of metallurgical slags, potentially limiting their use in asphalt pavements. However, the chemical characterization of FNS showed negligible levels of calcium, with no detectable calcium oxide (CaO), suggesting that expansion issues typically associated with calcium-containing slags are unlikely to affect the application of FNS in asphalt.
In steel slags, expansion is mainly caused by the transformation of calcium oxide into hydroxide in the presence of water or air. In contrast, the absence of calcium in FNS may account for the minimal expansion observed in this material, underscoring its promising potential as an aggregate for use in paving applications.

3.3.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

The X-ray diffractogram (Figure 8) obtained for the RFNS sample reveals a high incidence of peaks, suggesting that the slag structure is predominantly crystalline. The diffractogram also indicates the presence of the mineral Laihunite [Fe2+Fe3+2(SiO4)2].
Branco [70] defines Laihunite as an iron silicate, Fe3(SiO4)2 (number from ICDD:70-1861), which occurs in monoclinic, tubular, or prismatic crystals ranging from 0.3 mm to 0.6 mm. According to Kitamura et al. [71], Laihunite is a type of distorted olivine mineral. The authors studied Laihunite using X-ray diffraction, electron probe microanalysis, and analytical electron microscopy, concluding that Laihunite is a mixture of Laihunite and Magnetite, formed through the oxidation of Fayalite.
Fayalite, a mineral of the olivine group, was named by Gmelin in 1840 after its type locality on Faial Island (Ilha do Faial), Azores District (Açores), Portugal. While it is very rare in nature, Fayalite is commonly found in the metallurgy industry, particularly in iron slags [72]. According to Wenk and Bulakh [73] and Deer, Howie and Zussman [74], the hardness of Laihunite is comparable to that of quartz, a mineral often found in the sand fraction.
Due to its crystalline structure and the presence of minerals such as Laihunite and Magnetite, FNS offers several advantages when used in asphalt mixtures. The high hardness of the minerals present in the slag can enhance the wear and abrasion resistance of the mixtures, thereby improving their durability and extending their service life.

3.3.3. Optical Microscopy

In the Optical Microscopy (OM) analysis, shown in Figure 9, the surface of the FRNS aggregate was examined at 40× magnification. The analysis revealed that the aggregate has a smooth surface with no visible pores or cracks. The shape of the grains ranges from spherical to irregular, and the absence of pores may impact the adhesion of the binder to the aggregate. Additionally, the aggregate exhibited a color and vitreous sheen similar to that observed in the mineral Fayalite.

3.3.4. Environmental Analysis

Table 4 presents the chemical characterization data of the RFNS sample, including the contents found in leaching and solubilization tests. Additionally, Table 5 provides a qualitative characterization of the raw RFNS, highlighting the highest and lowest concentrations of the chemical constituents identified in the analyzed sample, as well as traces of the minimum chemical composition detected.
The RFNS exhibited notable levels of potentially hazardous metals, including nickel, chromium, copper, and vanadium, as shown in Table 4. Despite these elevated concentrations, the material was classified as type II B inert, as detailed in Table 5, because none of these metals exceeded the concentration limits established by the Brazilian standard NBR 10004 [63]. This classification confirms that the metals are in a stable form that is not prone to leaching or solubilization, thereby posing no environmental contamination risks in its intended application.

3.4. Dosage Design

Based on the physical characterization of the aggregates present in the asphalt mixture, detailed in Table 1 and Table 2, and the granulometric trace falling within range C of the standard DNIT 031 [65], as illustrated in Figure 10, the mixture is composed of 22% gravel 1, 15% gravel 0, 20% dust, 3% cement, and 40% RFNS.
Following the Marshall methodology protocol, the volumetric, stability, and tensile strength of the mix dosed in the laboratory are presented in Table 6, where it can be observed that the obtained values were satisfactory, within the limits of the DNIT 031 standard [65], for the ideal binder content of 4.3%. It is noteworthy that the void volume reached almost the lower limit, demonstrating that the asphalt mass became quite dense after compaction, with few voids.

3.5. Experimental Area Analysis

Figure 11 presents an image of the parking lot for passenger boarding and disembarking after completing the laboratory phase and standard asphalt mixture application procedures [65].
During the technological control of the experimental area, the binder extraction test was performed using electric rotarex equipment, as described in the Brazilian standard DNER053 [75]. This process revealed a slight increase in the optimal binder content (0.66%) in the final mixed batch, attributed to the calibration of the asphalt plant. This calibration ensures accurate measurement and blending of the binder, aligning the plant’s performance with specified standards and correcting any discrepancies during production. Such adjustments are routine and maintain the quality and consistency of the asphalt mixture, and the observed variation is considered acceptable. Additionally, the granulometry of the mixed batch was verified and remained within the limits of range C of the DNIT [65], with some variations but still within the working range and tolerances allowed for each sieve.
Furthermore, small disaggregation points of the coating were observed in some areas, as shown in Figure 12.
However, this disaggregation stabilized after a few months of operation, and the pavement condition after four years of operation can be considered satisfactory and in good condition, as verified in Figure 13.
Table 7 presents the average results obtained from the RM test, according to the Brazilian standard DNIT 135 [66], on three test specimens extracted from the section. The overall average result was 6323 MPa, a significant and satisfactory value based on typical values between 2000 and 8000 MPa for asphalt concretes at 25 °C [76]. Furthermore, the behavior is explained by the presence of Fayalite and Magnetite in the RFNS, which are hard, dense, and hydrophobic components that produce greater elastic deformation of the binder before rupture. In this sense, the cracking of the asphalt coating, caused by the resilient deformation of the underlying layers, can be attenuated due to the value found.

4. Conclusions

This work included the experimental study of the addition of ferronickel slag to the asphalt coating layer of a passenger boarding and disembarking parking lot at the Codemin Industrial Unit in Niquelândia, Goiás. According to the analyses conducted, the conclusions reached are as follows:
  • Reduction ferronickel slag (RFNS) is considered inert, as it has low concentrations of harmful elements to the environment, allowing its use in pavements without soil or water contamination;
  • The chemical analysis of RFNS revealed that it is primarily composed of MgO, Fe2O3, and SiO2, which pose minimal environmental risk. The absence of significant calcium content reduces concerns about expansion issues typical of calcium-rich slags. The X-ray diffractogram indicated a predominantly crystalline structure with minerals like Laihunite and Magnetite, suggesting that FNS has high hardness. This crystalline structure and mineral content enhance the wear and abrasion resistance of asphalt mixtures, potentially improving their durability and extending their service life;
  • The hot mix asphalt (HMA) containing RFNS meets the regulatory specifications and technological control during the execution of the experimental area and obtained an average resilient modulus value of 6323 MPa, indicating the coating’s efficiency regarding pavement mechanics parameters;
  • Visual inspections conducted four years after the construction of the experimental area showed that the pavement is still in excellent condition. These findings confirm that RFNS slag is a promising alternative aggregate for asphalt mixtures, providing both durability and long-term performance for local road infrastructure projects. The successful application of RFNS highlights both its viability for local road paving near industrial sites and its potential for promoting sustainable waste management solutions. The results underscore the importance of academia–industry collaboration in advancing environmentally responsible practices, reinforcing the contribution of RFNS to enhancing local infrastructure and promoting a more sustainable future.
Future research should include a comprehensive evaluation of production costs and environmental impacts across the life cycle of these asphalt mixtures, from material extraction to disposal. This analysis will facilitate a more accurate assessment of how the technical application of these sustainable mixtures aligns with economic and environmental goals, providing robust data for strategic decision-making in the pavement sector. Additionally, it is essential to conduct in-depth laboratory tests to further investigate the behavior of asphalt mixtures containing RFNS. Key tests should include evaluating resilience modulus, permanent deformation, and fatigue performance. These assessments will help determine the suitability of RFNS mixtures for higher-traffic volume roads, enabling the broader application of this industrial byproduct in diverse pavement scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.C., C.R.C.L.A.M., G.P.P.d.S. and P.H.P.M.d.S.; methodology, L.M.C., G.P.P.d.S. and A.C.R.G.; software, L.M.C. and P.H.P.M.d.S.; formal analysis, S.N.M., L.M.C. and A.C.R.G.; investigation, A.C.R.G., G.P.P.d.S. and L.M.C.; resources, P.H.P.M.d.S.; data curation, G.P.P.d.S. and A.C.R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.C., G.P.P.d.S. and P.H.P.M.d.S.; writing—review and editing, L.M.C., P.H.P.M.d.S. and S.N.M.; supervision, A.C.R.G.; project administration, A.C.R.G.; funding acquisition, S.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anglo American for their partnership.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Branca, T.A.; Colla, V.; Algermissen, D.; Granbom, H.; Martini, U.; Morillon, A.; Pietruck, R.; Rosendahl, S. Reuse and recycling of by-products in the steel sector: Recent achievements paving the way to circular economy and industrial symbiosis in Europe. Metals 2020, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Birat, J.P. Recycling and by-products in the steel industry. Revue de Métallurgie 2003, 100, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iluţiu-Varvara, D.A.; Aciu, C. Metallurgical wastes as resources for sustainability of the steel industry. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Strauch, J.C.M.; Souza, K.V.d.; Ajara, C.; Teixeira, M.d.P.; Cardoso, S.C. Grandes Mineradoras e a Comunidade em Niquelândia (GO); CETEM/MCTI: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2011; pp. 135–162. [Google Scholar]
  5. Especial-Panorama do Mapeamento Geológico no Brasil-Anglo American 50 anos, 2023. Available online: https://www.brasilmineral.com.br/revista/429/Revista%20Brasil%20Mineral%20-%20429.pdf (accessed on 19 September 2024).
  6. Kurniati, E.O.; Pederson, F.; Kim, H.J. Application of steel slags, ferronickel slags, and copper mining waste as construction materials: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 198, 107175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Long, W.J.; Peng, J.K.; Gu, Y.C.; Li, J.L.; Dong, B.; Xing, F.; Fang, Y. Recycled use of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash and ferronickel slag for eco-friendly mortar through geopolymer technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bao, J.; Yu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, P.; Wan, X.; Gao, S.; Zhao, T. Application of ferronickel slag as fine aggregate in recycled aggregate concrete and the effects on transport properties. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 304, 127149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xing, C.; Tang, S.; Chang, Z.; Han, Z.; Li, H.; Zhu, B. A comprehensive review on the plant-mixed cold recycling technology of emulsified asphalt: Raw materials and factors affecting performances. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 439, 137344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saha, A.K.; Khan, M.; Sarker, P.K. Value added utilization of by-product electric furnace ferronickel slag as construction materials: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 134, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qian, Y.; Xu, C.; Yang, T.; Yu, H.; Zhou, G.; Zhuang, P. Alkali-silica reaction of ferronickel slag fine aggregate in Portland cement and alkali-activated slag mortars: Pessimum effect investigation. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 89, 109349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, Z.; Peng, H.; Mei, P.; Huang, F.; Yi, S.; Feng, F. Performance Analysis of Ferronickel Slag-Ordinary Portland Cement Pervious Concrete. Materials 2024, 17, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, Y.; Duan, X.; Li, B.; Lu, S.; Liu, T.; Li, Y. Synergistic Activation of Electric Furnace Ferronickel Slag by Mechanical Grinding and Chemical Activators to Prepare Cementitious Composites. Materials 2024, 17, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saha, A.K.; Sarker, P.K. Sustainable use of ferronickel slag fine aggregate and fly ash in structural concrete: Mechanical properties and leaching study. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, Q.D.; Castel, A.; Kim, T.; Khan, M.S. Performance of fly ash concrete with ferronickel slag fine aggregate against alkali-silica reaction and chloride diffusion. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 139, 106265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nguyen, Q.D.; Khan, M.S.H.; Castel, A.; Kim, T. Durability and Microstructure Properties of Low-Carbon Concrete Incorporating Ferronickel Slag Sand and Fly Ash. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 31, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nuruzzaman, M.; Kuri, J.C.; Sarker, P.K. Strength, permeability and microstructure of self-compacting concrete with the dual use of ferronickel slag as fine aggregate and supplementary binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 318, 125927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ernawan, E.; Sjah, J.; Handika, N.; Astutiningsih, S.; Vincens, E. Mechanical Properties of Concrete Containing Ferronickel Slag as Fine Aggregate Substitute Using Digital Image Correlation Analysis. Buildings 2023, 13, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cho, W.J.; Kim, M.J.; Lee, D.S.V. Characterization of Portland Cement Incorporated with FNS. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 7047549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Navaratnam, S.; Tushar, Q.; Jahan, I.; Zhang, G. Environmental Sustainability of Industrial Waste-Based Cementitious Materials: A Review, Experimental Investigation and Life-Cycle Assessment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Delgado, B.G.; Viana da Fonseca, A.; Fortunato, E. Stress–Strain Analysis of Heavy Haul Rail Track with Steel Slag Ballast by Laboratory Tests and Numerical Simulations. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jing, G.; Aela, P.; Zhou, Q.; Jia, W. Steel Slag Aggregate Characteristics Evaluation as Railway Ballast. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV; Springer, C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Delgado, B.G.; da Fonseca, A.V.; Fortunato, E.; Paixão, A.; Alves, R. Geomechanical assessment of an inert steel slag aggregate as an alternative ballast material for heavy haul rail tracks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 279, 122438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomes, B.; Guimarães, A.C.R.; do Nascimento, F.A.C.; Tanabe, J. Ballast with siderurgic aggregates: Variation analysis of the shape parameters of particles submitted to triaxial tests through 3D scanner. Soils Rocks 2023, 46, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guimarães, A.C.R.; Ávila Costa, K.; de Miranda Reis, M.; Santana, C.S.A.; Castro, C.D. Study of controlled leaching process of steel slag in soxhlet extractor aiming employment in pavements. Transp. Geotech. 2021, 27, 100485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, J.; Liu, Q.; Deng, Y.; Yu, X.; Feng, Q.; Yan, C. Residual Steel Slag-Modified Expansive Soil and Its Application in Highway Subbase Layer. Soils Found. 2019, 59, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes, E.C.; da Silva, T.O.; Pitanga, H.N.; Pedroti, L.G.; Franco de Carvalho, J.M.; Nalon, G.H.; de Lima, G.E.S.; de Araújo, E.N.D. Stabilization of Clayey and Sandy Soils with Slag Fines from Cupola Furnace for Road Construction. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2023, 24, 247–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lopes, E.C.; da Silva, T.O.; Pitanga, H.N.; Pedroti, L.G.; de Carvalho, J.M.F.; Nalon, G.H.; de Paula Rodrigues, K.H. Chemical, Mineralogical, Microstructural, and Engineering Properties of Tropical Soils Stabilized with the Combined and Individual Use of Different Types of Steel Slag. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2023, 25, 1507–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alves, R.; Rios, S.; Fortunato, E.; Viana da Fonseca, A.; Guimarães Delgado, B. Mechanical Behaviour of Steel Slag–Rubber Mixtures: Laboratory Assessment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodrigues, K.H.d.P.; da Silva, T.O.; Pitanga, H.N.; de Almeida, M.S.d.S.; Pedroti, L.G.; Rodrigues, M.H.R.; Lopes, E.C. Effect of Carbonation of Soil-Slag Mixtures on the Resilient Behaviour and Structural Response of an Asphalt Pavement. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2024, 25, 2101–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shamsi Susahab, J.; Ardakani, A.; Hassanlourad, M. Strength Improvement of Clay Subgrade Soil Stabilised with Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Asi, I.M.; Qasrawi, H.Y.; Shalabi, F.I. Use of steel slag aggregate in asphalt concrete mixes. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2007, 34, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ahmedzade, P.; Sengoz, B. Evaluation of steel slag coarse aggregate in hot mix asphalt concrete. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rondón-Quintana, H.A.; Ruge-Cárdenas, J.C.; Farias, M.M.D. Hot Asphalt Behavior Containing Blast Furnace Slag as Aggregate: Evaluation by Mass and Volume Replacement. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04018364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Masoudi, S.; Abtahi, S.M.; Goli, A. Evaluation of electric arc furnace steel slag coarse aggregate in warm mix asphalt subjected to long-term aging. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 135, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Georgiou, P.; Loizos, A. Environmental assessment of warm mix asphalt incorporating steel slag and high reclaimed asphalt for wearing courses: A case study. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2021, 22, S662–S671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Awed, A.M.; Tarbay, E.W.; El-Badawy, S.M.; Azam, A.M. Performance Characteristics of Asphalt Mixtures with Industrial Waste/Subproduct Materials as Mineral Fillers under Static and Cyclic Loading. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2022, 23, 335–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goli, A. The study of the feasibility of using recycled steel slag aggregate in hot mix asphalt. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Raschia, S.; Tattolo, S.; Rilievi, A. Evaluation of high percentage of alternative aggregates for the production of hot mix asphalt surface layers. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2023, 25, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhong, T.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yao, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, L. Utilization of steel slag as coarse aggregate and filler in stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixture: Engineering performance, environmental impact and economic benefits analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 450, 141891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, W.; Li, H.; Zhu, H.; Xu, P. The Interfacial Adhesion Performance and Mechanism of a Modified Asphalt–Steel Slag Aggregate. Materials 2020, 13, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hasita, S.; Rachan, R.; Suddeepong, A.; Horpibulsuk, S.; Arulrajah, A.; Mohammadinia, A.; Nazir, R. Performance Improvement of Asphalt Concretes Using Steel Slag as a Replacement Material. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, D.; Chen, S.H.; Mon, H.H. California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Ferrous-Nickel Slag, Soil Improvement, Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 723, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gökalp, İ.; Uz, V.E.; Saltan, M.; Tutumluer, E. Technical and environmental evaluation of metallurgical slags as aggregate for sustainable pavement layer applications. Transp. Geotech. 2018, 14, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. He, W.; Liu, J.F.; Yin, P.B.; Chen, Y.H.; Yang, W.B.; Chen, Y.L.; Wu, Y.C. Properties and field tests of industrial ferro-nickel slag for roads. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 41, 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mrema, A.; Yeon-Tae, K.; Jae-Jun, L.; Su-Hyung, L. Utilization of Ferronickel Slags as Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt: Laboratory Evaluation. J. Korean Road Soc. (Int. J. Highw. Eng.) 2023, 25, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yin, P.; Wang, J.; He, W.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Jia, Z. Machine learning-based study on the mechanical properties and embankment settlement prediction model of nickel–iron slag modified soil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 431, 136468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, G.; Thompson, R. Slag Use in Highway Construction—The Philosophy and Technology of its Utilization. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2011, 4, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, G.; Thompson, R.G.; Wang, Y. Hot Mix Asphalt Containing Nickel Slag Aggregate: Laboratory Evaluation for Use in Highway Construction. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2208, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cosme, J.; Fernandes, G.; Pinto Fernandes, D. Utilization of ferronickel slag in hot mix asphalt. Civ. Eng. REM Int. Eng. J. 2021, 74, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Rodagem. Agregados—Análise Granulométrica; ME 083; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  52. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Rodagem. Agregado Miúdo—Determinação da Densidade Real; ME 084; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  53. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Estradas de Rodagem. Agregados: Determinação da Absorção e da Massa Específica de Agregado graúDo; Norma DNER ME 195; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  54. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Rodagem. Agregado—Adesividade a Ligante Betuminoso; ME 079; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  55. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Rodagem. Agregados—Determinação da Perda ao Choque no Aparelho Treton; ME 399; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  56. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Rodagem. Agregados—Determinação da Abrasão Los Angeles; ME 035; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  57. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura e Transporte (DNIT). Material Asfáltico—Determinação da Penetração; DNIT-ME 155/2010; DNIT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  58. Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura e Transporte (DNIT). Materiais Asfálticos—Determinação do Ponto de Amolecimento—Método do Anel e Bola; DNIT-ME 131/2010; DNIT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  59. de Normas Técnicas, A.A.B. Adhesives—Determination of the Viscosity—Method Brookfield Viscometer, NBR9277; ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  60. de Normas Técnicas, A.A.B. Petroleum Products—Determination of the Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup, NBR11341; ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  61. Departamento Nacional de Estradas de Rodagem. Materiais Betuminosos—Determinação da Ductilidade, DNER-ME 163/98; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  62. ASTM D 2872; Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  63. ABNT—Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Resíduos Sólidos—Classificação, NBR 10004; ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  64. DNER—Departamento Nacional de Estradas de Rodagem. Misturas Betuminosas a Quente, Norma DNER 043/1995; DNER: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  65. DNIT—Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. Pavimentos Flexíveis—Concreto AsfáLtico—Especificação de Serviço, Norma DNIT 031/2006-ES; DNIT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  66. DNIT—Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. Pavimentação AsfáLtica—Misturas AsfáLticas—Determinação do Módulo de Resiliência—Método de Ensaio, Norma DNIT 135/2018-ME; DNIT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  67. Balbo, J.T. Pavimentação AsfáLtica: Materiais, Projeto e Restauração; Oficina de Textos: São Paulo, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  68. Silva, R.G.O. Estudo Laboratorial do Desempenho Mecânico de Misturas Asfálticas com Resíduos Industriais de Minério de Ferro. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  69. de Infraestrutura de Transportes, D.N. Pavimentos Flexíveis—Cimentos Asfálticos de Petróleo—Especificação de Material; DNIT-EM 095; DNIT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  70. Branco, P.M. Dicionário de Mineralogia e Gemologia; Oficina de Textos: São Paulo, Brazil, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kitamura, M.; Shen, B.; Banno, S.; Morimoto, N. Fine textures of laihunite, a nonstoichiometric distorted olivine-type mineral. Am. Mineral. 1984, 69, 154–160. [Google Scholar]
  72. Faialita. Available online: http://www.mindat.org/min-1458.html (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  73. Wenk, H.R.; Bulakh, A. Minerals: Their Constitution and Origin; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  74. Deer, W.A.; Howie, R.A.; Zussman, J. An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals, 3rd ed.; Mineralogical Society: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  75. National Department of Roads and Highways. Bituminous Mixtures—Bitumen Percentage; DNER ME 53; National Department of Roads and Highways: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  76. Bernucci, L.B.; da Motta, L.M.G.; Ceratti, J.A.P.; Soares, J.B. Pavimentação Asfáltica: Formação Básica para Engenheiros, 4th ed.; Petrobras: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A flowchart of the experimental procedure for this study.
Figure 1. A flowchart of the experimental procedure for this study.
Sustainability 16 08642 g001
Figure 2. A sample of ferronickel slag used in this study.
Figure 2. A sample of ferronickel slag used in this study.
Sustainability 16 08642 g002
Figure 3. Limestone aggregates in the following fractions: coarse aggregate (B-1), medium aggregate (B-0), and dust (pó).
Figure 3. Limestone aggregates in the following fractions: coarse aggregate (B-1), medium aggregate (B-0), and dust (pó).
Sustainability 16 08642 g003
Figure 4. The location of the experimental area.
Figure 4. The location of the experimental area.
Sustainability 16 08642 g004
Figure 5. The initial condition of the experimental area.
Figure 5. The initial condition of the experimental area.
Sustainability 16 08642 g005
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of reject powders at different magnifications: (a) 40×, showing the overall particle distribution; and (b) 150×, highlighting the detailed morphology of the particles.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of reject powders at different magnifications: (a) 40×, showing the overall particle distribution; and (b) 150×, highlighting the detailed morphology of the particles.
Sustainability 16 08642 g006
Figure 7. EDX map of ferronickel slag.
Figure 7. EDX map of ferronickel slag.
Sustainability 16 08642 g007
Figure 8. The X-ray diffractogram obtained for the RFNS sample.
Figure 8. The X-ray diffractogram obtained for the RFNS sample.
Sustainability 16 08642 g008
Figure 9. OM image of sample with 40× magnification.
Figure 9. OM image of sample with 40× magnification.
Sustainability 16 08642 g009
Figure 10. The particle size curve of the HMA containing RFNS and the normative design limits.
Figure 10. The particle size curve of the HMA containing RFNS and the normative design limits.
Sustainability 16 08642 g010
Figure 11. Parking lot for boarding and disembarking of passengers concluded.
Figure 11. Parking lot for boarding and disembarking of passengers concluded.
Sustainability 16 08642 g011
Figure 12. Status of experimental area. (a) Pavement disaggregation. (b) Point disaggregation.
Figure 12. Status of experimental area. (a) Pavement disaggregation. (b) Point disaggregation.
Sustainability 16 08642 g012
Figure 13. Status of experimental area after four years of implementation. (a) Frontal view. (b) Side view.
Figure 13. Status of experimental area after four years of implementation. (a) Frontal view. (b) Side view.
Sustainability 16 08642 g013
Table 1. Particle size distribution of coarse gravel 1, coarse gravel 0, stone dust, cement, and RFNS measured by various sieve sizes.
Table 1. Particle size distribution of coarse gravel 1, coarse gravel 0, stone dust, cement, and RFNS measured by various sieve sizes.
Sieve #Coarse Gravel 1Coarse Gravel 0Stone DustCementRFNS
1 and ½”100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
1”100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
¾”100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
½”42.598.9100.0100.0100.0
3/8”4.882.8100.0100.0100.0
No. 40.213.195.5100.097.7
No. 100.24.561.9100.063.8
No. 400.22.733.3100.04.0
No. 800.22.427.7100.00.8
No. 2000.21.515.392.00.4
Table 2. The physical properties of the materials used, including coarse aggregates, dust, cement, and slag.
Table 2. The physical properties of the materials used, including coarse aggregates, dust, cement, and slag.
MaterialTrue Density
(g/cm³)
Apparent Density
(g/cm³)
Absorption
(%)
AdhesivenessTreton Impact
(%)
Los Angeles Abrasion
(%)
Coarse Aggregate 12.822.791.7Satisfactory30.6125.6
Coarse Aggregate 02.882.75-Satisfactory
Dust2.85----
Cement3.10---
Slag3.32.990.1Satisfactory *
* With the addition of DOPE.
Table 3. The characteristics of the 50/70 binder used in this paper.
Table 3. The characteristics of the 50/70 binder used in this paper.
Test–CAP 50/70UnitsLimitsResults
Penetration (100 g, 5 s, 25 °C, 0.1 mm)0.1 mm50 to 7050
Softening Point, min.°C5258.6
Brookfield Viscosity at 135 °C, SP 21, 20 rpm, min.-274375
Brookfield Viscosity at 150 °C, SP 21, min.cP112183
Brookfield Viscosity at 177 °C, SP 21-57 to 28568
Flash Point, min.°C235348
Ductility at 25 °C, min.cm60>100
Effect of Heat and Air (RTFOT) at 163 °C, 85 min
Increase in Softening Point, max.°C865.5
Retained Penetration, min.%5555
Ductility at 25 °C, min.cm20>100
Relative Density--1.04
Table 4. Characterization of ferronickel reduction slag.
Table 4. Characterization of ferronickel reduction slag.
Raw SampleLeachingSolubilization
ParametersContents (% and ppm)Levels (mg/L)Levels (mg/L)
Silicon43.60%2.808.10
Magnesium0.36%4.604.58
Aluminum3.90%<0.05<0.05
Iron14.90%0.950.19
Total Hardness as CaCO31.49%26.4126.41
Mg Hardness1.49%18.9218.86
Chromium1.30%<0.05<0.05
Nickel0.14%<0.02<0.02
Titanium0.15%<0.01<0.01
Manganese0.34%<0.11<0.05
Niobium<5.00 ppm<0.10<0.10
Copper106.00 ppm<0.02<0.02
Vanadium184.00 ppm<0.01<0.01
Zirconium27.00 ppm<0.01<0.01
Cobalt66.00 ppm<0.10<0.10
Test report provided by Anglo American.
Table 5. Spectrogram analysis for ferronickel reduction slag.
Table 5. Spectrogram analysis for ferronickel reduction slag.
RFNSMajor Constituents
Concentration: >5%
Silicon, Magnesium, Iron
Minor Constituents
Concentration: <5% and >0.1%
Aluminum, Chromium, Calcium
Traces: Concentration: <0.1%Nickel, Titanium, Manganese,
Niobium, Copper, Vanadium, Zirconium, Cobalt
Test report provided by Anglo American.
Table 6. Marshall mix design parameters.
Table 6. Marshall mix design parameters.
ItemValuesLimits
Binder Content4.3%-
Bulk Density2.52-
Air Voids (%)3.53–5
Voids in Mineral Aggregate—VMA (%)15.5-
Void-Filled with Bitumen—VFB (%)77.075–82
Maximum Theoretical Density2.51-
Minimum Stability (kgf) 75 blows850500
Indirect Tensile Strength (MPa)0.750.65
Table 7. The RM of the samples collected from the experimental area.
Table 7. The RM of the samples collected from the experimental area.
Force (Unit)Displacement (Unit) MR = F Δ t ( 0.9976 μ + 0.2692 )
Sample 1313.250.0038087099
313.830.0036787364
312.550.0037587178
Average7214
Sample 2218.450.002926457
219.520.0030756160
220.50.0031945959
Average6192
Sample 3250.910.0038135679
251.50.0038895581
250.060.0039725433
Average5564
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coelho, L.M.; Guimarães, A.C.R.; Alves Moreira, C.R.C.L.; dos Santos, G.P.P.; Monteiro, S.N.; da Silveira, P.H.P.M. Feasibility of Using Ferronickel Slag as a Sustainable Alternative Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198642

AMA Style

Coelho LM, Guimarães ACR, Alves Moreira CRCL, dos Santos GPP, Monteiro SN, da Silveira PHPM. Feasibility of Using Ferronickel Slag as a Sustainable Alternative Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coelho, Lisley Madeira, Antônio Carlos Rodrigues Guimarães, Claudio Rafael Cicuto Landim Alves Moreira, Graziella Pereira Pires dos Santos, Sergio Neves Monteiro, and Pedro Henrique Poubel Mendonça da Silveira. 2024. "Feasibility of Using Ferronickel Slag as a Sustainable Alternative Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198642

APA Style

Coelho, L. M., Guimarães, A. C. R., Alves Moreira, C. R. C. L., dos Santos, G. P. P., Monteiro, S. N., & da Silveira, P. H. P. M. (2024). Feasibility of Using Ferronickel Slag as a Sustainable Alternative Aggregate in Hot Mix Asphalt. Sustainability, 16(19), 8642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop