Evaluating BIM’s Role in Transforming Cash Flow Forecasting Among Construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian Narrative
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. An Overview of the Cash Flow Management in Construction Industry
Cash Flow Forecasting and Risks Involved
2.2. Construction SMEs in Saudi Arabia
Cash Flow Management in SMEs
2.3. Building Information Modelling (BIM)
2.4. BIM Applications in Cash Flow Management
2.4.1. BIM 4D for Scheduling
2.4.2. BIM 5D for Cost Information
2.4.3. BIM for Information Management
2.5. BIM Implementation Strategies for Cash Flow Management
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Data Collection
The Recruitment of Survey Respondents
3.2. Data Analysis
4. Research Findings and Discussion
4.1. Demographics
4.2. Reliability Analysis Using Cronbach’s Alpha
4.3. Cash Flow Forecasting Challenges in Construction SMEs
In-Depth Analysis of Key Challenges
4.4. Role of BIM in Mitigating CFF Challenges
4.5. BIM Implementation Strategies
Detailed Analysis and Discussion of Implementation Strategies
5. Integrating BIM into CFF: A Proposed Guideline
- Step 1: Assess Organisational Readiness
- Step 2: Prioritise Workforce Development (STR1)
- Use of 5D BIM for cost estimation and cash flow analysis.
- Integration of BIM software with financial management systems.
- Case studies demonstrating successful BIM implementation in CFF.
- Step 3: Engage Stakeholders through Education (STR3)
- Demonstrate the benefits of BIM in financial transparency and efficiency.
- Address misconceptions and reduce resistance to change.
- Encourage collaborative adoption of BIM practices.
- Step 4: Implement BIM Incrementally (STR2)
- Phase 1: Implement 3D modeling for design accuracy.
- Phase 2: Integrate 4D scheduling to improve project timelines.
- Phase 3: Utilise 5D BIM for detailed cost estimation and cash flow forecasting.
- Step 5: Leverage Government Support (STR4)
- Apply for subsidies or grants aimed at technology adoption.
- Aligning projects with government initiatives that require or favor BIM usage.
- Participate in government-sponsored training programs.
- Step 6: Establish Collaborative Networks (STR5)
- Engage in mentorship programs to learn from experienced BIM users.
- Share resources and best practices within a network of SMEs.
- Collaborate on projects to gain practical experience in BIM applications.
6. Conclusions and Way Forward
- Accessible BIM Training: Providing affordable and flexible training programs tailored to the needs of SMEs enhances workforce competencies and facilitates smoother adoption.
- Phased Implementation Approach: Gradually integrating BIM into organizational processes reduces disruption and allows SMEs to build capacity over time, starting with essential functions like cost estimation and progressively adding more complex features.
- Targeted Stakeholder Education: Conducting workshops and seminars for clients, owners, and other stakeholders fosters a collaborative environment and aligns expectations, mitigating resistance and enhancing cooperation.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Thomas, K. An Investigation of the Challenges Faced by the Small and Medium Enterprise Contractors in the Construction Industry of Windhoek. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ikediashi, D.I.; Okolie, K.C. An Assessment of Risks Associated with Contractor’s Cash Flow Projections in South-South, Nigeria. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2022, 22, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebowale, O.; Agumba, J. Productivity Improvement Framework for South African Construction SMEs. J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov. 2023, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Joburi, K.I.; Al-Aomar, R.; Bahri, M.E. Analyzing the Impact of Negative Cash Flow on Construction Performance in the Dubai Area. J. Manag. Eng. 2012, 28, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, H.; Ahmed, V.; Beheiry, S. Construction Cash Flow Risk Index. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 14, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Msawil, M.; Elghaish, F.; Seneviratne, K.; McIlwaine, S. Developing a Parametric Cash Flow Forecasting Model for Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Comparative Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ashmori, Y.Y.; Othman, I.; Rahmawati, Y.; Amran, Y.H.M.; Sabah, S.H.A.; Rafindadi, A.D.; Mikić, M. BIM Benefits and Its Influence on the BIM Implementation in Malaysia. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020, 11, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjbar, A.A.; Ansari, R.; Taherkhani, R.; Hosseini, M.R. Developing a Novel Cash Flow Risk Analysis Framework for Construction Projects Based on 5D BIM. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 103341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Albashrawi, S. Quality Infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and Its Importance for Vision 2030. Mapan 2022, 37, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radl, J.; Kaiser, J. Benefits of Implementation of Common Data Environment (CDE) into Construction Projects. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic, 18–22 June 2019; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 471, p. 22021. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.; Grobler, F. Preparing a Construction Cash Flow Analysis Using Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technology. J. Constr. Eng. Proj. Manag. 2013, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadisheykhsarmast, S.; Sonmez, R. A Smart Contract System for Security of Payment of Construction Contracts. Autom. Constr. 2020, 120, 103401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaboud, N.; Alshahrani, A. Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the Saudi Construction Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modelling. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, A.H.; Rahman, I.A.; Memon, I.; Azman, N.I.A. BIM in Malaysian Construction Industry: Status, Advantages, Barriers and Strategies to Enhance the Implementation Level. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 8, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmudnia, D.; Arashpour, M.; Yang, R. Blockchain in Construction Management: Applications, Advantages and Limitations. Autom. Constr. 2022, 140, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Mahmoud, B.; Lehoux, N.; Blanchet, P.; Cloutier, C. Barriers, Strategies, and Best Practices for BIM Adoption in Quebec Prefabrication Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Buildings 2022, 12, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omopariola, E.D.; Windapo, A.; Edwards, D.J.; Thwala, W.D. Contractors’ Perceptions of the Effects of Cash Flow on Construction Projects. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2020, 18, 308–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konior, J.; Szóstak, M. Methodology of Planning the Course of the Cumulative Cost Curve in Construction Projects. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shash, A.A.; Qarra, A. Al Cash Flow Management of Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia. Proj. Manag. J. 2018, 49, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uwonda, G.; Okello, N.; Okello, N.G. Cash Flow Management Utilization by Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Northern Uganda. Merit Res. J. Account. Audit. Econ. Financ. 2013, 1, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
- Adjei, E.A.G.; Fugar, F.D.K.; Adinyira, E.; Edwards, D.J.; Pärn, E.A. Exploring the Significant Cash Flow Factors Influencing Building Projects Profitability in Ghana. Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 7, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
- Tarawneh, S.; Almahmoud, A.F.; Hajjeh, H. Impact of Cash Flow Variation on Project Performance: Contractors’ Perspective. Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv. 2023, 15, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinradewo, O.; Aigbavboa, C.; Oke, A.; Coffie, H. Appraisal of Risk Contingency Planning for Construction Projects. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Ota, Nigeria, 24–28 June 2019; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 640, p. 12019. [Google Scholar]
- Eldosouky, I.A.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Mohammed, H.E.-D. Management of Construction Cost Contingency Covering Upside and Downside Risks. Alex. Eng. J. 2014, 53, 863–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odeyinka, H.A.; Lowe, J.; Kaka, A. An Evaluation of Risk Factors Impacting Construction Cash Flow Forecast. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2008, 13, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.-H.; Chen, W.-H. Contractor Costs of Factoring Account Receivables for a Construction Project. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2012, 18, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, M.; You, S.; Chi, S.; Yu, I.; Hwang, B.-G. The Relationship between Unbilled Accounts Receivable and Financial Performance of Construction Contractors. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutrisna, M.; Pellicer, E.; Torres-Machi, C.; Picornell, M. Exploring Earned Value Management in the Spanish Construction Industry as a Pathway to Competitive Advantage. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhosekar, S.K.; Vyas, G. Cost Controlling Using Earned Value Analysis in Construction Industries. Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol. 2012, 1, 324–332. [Google Scholar]
- Hwee, N.G.; Tiong, R.L.K. Model on Cash Flow Forecasting and Risk Analysis for Contracting Firms. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2002, 20, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AbuElnasr, M.; Etman, E.; Sanad, H. Optimizing Cash Flow of Construction Projects through Material Procurement Plans. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Geotech. Eng. 2022, 6, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
- Kaka, A.P. Towards More Flexible and Accurate Cash Flow Forecasting. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1996, 14, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navon, R. Resource-Based Model for Automatic Cash-Flow Forecasting. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1995, 13, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.O.; Park, H.K. The Algorithm of Cash Flow Forecasting in Planning Stage for Construction Project. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT), Bali, Indonesia, 11–13 June 2012; pp. 674–677. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, R.M.; Babu, R.I.I. Time and Cost Overruns in the UAE Construction Industry: A Critical Analysis. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2020, 20, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, W.; Deng, B.; Yin, Y.; Lv, X.; Deng, Z. Critical Factors Influencing Cost Overrun in Construction Projects: A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation. Buildings 2022, 12, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leskinen, N.; Vimpari, J.; Junnila, S. A Review of the Impact of Green Building Certification on the Cash Flows and Values of Commercial Properties. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pablo, Z.; London, K.A. Stable Relationality and Dynamic Innovation: Two Models of Collaboration in SME-Driven Offsite Manufacturing Supply Chains in Housing Construction. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2020, 27, 1553–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Lu, H.; Hu, W.; Gao, X.; Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. Understanding Behavioral Logic of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Small-and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises: Empirical Study from China. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 5020013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, E.M.; Lou, E.C.W.; Yusof, N.; Osmadi, A. Absorptive Capacity of Malaysian SME Construction Organisations. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2022, 18, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, J.M.; Buliga, O.; Voigt, K.-I. The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Strategy in the Design of Industry 4.0 Business Models-A Comparison between SMEs and Large Enterprises. Eur. Manag. J. 2021, 39, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elghaish, F.; Abrishami, S.; Abu Samra, S.; Gaterell, M.; Hosseini, M.R.; Wise, R. Cash Flow System Development Framework within Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Using BIM Tools. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2021, 21, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurgenson, S.; Bayyari, F.M.; Parker, J. A Comprehensive Renewable Energy Program for Saudi Vision 2030. Renew. Energy Focus 2016, 17, 182–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawindaran, N.; Nawaf, L.; Alarifi, S.; Alghazzawi, D.; Carroll, F.; Katib, I.; Hewage, C. Enhancing Cyber Security Governance and Policy for SMEs in Industry 5.0: A Comparative Study between Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Digital 2023, 3, 200–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elhassan, O.M. Obstacles and Problems Facing the Financing of Small and Medium Enterprises in KSA. J. Financ. Account. 2019, 7, 168–183. [Google Scholar]
- Alomar, A.A.; Alzahrani, A.A.; Alzahim, A.S.; Alajaji, M.A. COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation That Followed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Acad. J. Res. Sci. Publ. Vol. 2023, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamberi Ahmad, S. Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Development in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Problems and Constraints. World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 8, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, F.; Schmukler, S.L. Addressing the SME Finance Problem. In World Bank Research Policy Briefs No. 120333; 2017; Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3249560 (accessed on 11 November 2024).
- Manzoor, F.; Wei, L.; Sahito, N. The Role of SMEs in Rural Development: Access of SMEs to Finance as a Mediator. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowotarski, P.; Paslawski, J. Barriers in Running Construction SME–Case Study on Introduction of Agile Methodology to Electrical Subcontractor. Procedia Eng. 2015, 122, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Succar, B.; Kassem, M. Macro-BIM Adoption: Conceptual Structures. Autom. Constr. 2015, 57, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P. BIM Implementation–Global Strategies. Procedia Eng. 2014, 85, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacks, R.; Eastman, C.; Lee, G.; Teicholz, P. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; ISBN 1119287537. [Google Scholar]
- Viklund Tallgren, M.; Roupé, M.; Johansson, M.; Bosch-Sijtsema, P. BIM-Tool Development Enhancing Collaborative Scheduling for Pre-Construction. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2020, 25, 374–397. [Google Scholar]
- Doukari, O.; Seck, B.; Greenwood, D. The Creation of Construction Schedules in 4D BIM: A Comparison of Conventional and Automated Approaches. Buildings 2022, 12, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akob, Z.; Zaidee, M.; Hipni, A.; Koka, R. Coordination and Collaboration of Information for Pan Borneo Highway (Sarawak) via Common Data Environment (CDE). In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Selangor, Malaysia, 29–31 October 2018; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 512, p. 12001. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Yami, A.; Sanni-Anibire, M.O. BIM in the Saudi Arabian Construction Industry: State of the Art, Benefit and Barriers. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2021, 39, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerrish, T.; Ruikar, K.; Cook, M.; Johnson, M.; Phillip, M.; Lowry, C. BIM Application to Building Energy Performance Visualisation and Management: Challenges and Potential. Energy Build. 2017, 144, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariono, B.; Wasesa, M.; Dhewanto, W. The Drivers, Barriers, and Enablers of Building Information Modeling (BIM) Innovation in Developing Countries: Insights from Systematic Literature Review and Comparative Analysis. Buildings 2022, 12, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eadie, R.; Browne, M.; Odeyinka, H.; McKeown, C.; McNiff, S. BIM Implementation throughout the UK Construction Project Lifecycle: An Analysis. Autom. Constr. 2013, 36, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, J.K.W.; Zhou, J. Enhancing Environmental Sustainability over Building Life Cycles through Green BIM: A Review. Autom. Constr. 2015, 57, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, K.; Lill, I.; Witt, E. An Overview of BIM Adoption in the Construction Industry: Benefits and Barriers. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization, Tallinn, Estonia, 7–8 May 2019; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2019; pp. 297–303. [Google Scholar]
- Alirezaei, S.; Taghaddos, H.; Ghorab, K.; Tak, A.N.; Alirezaei, S. BIM-Augmented Reality Integrated Approach to Risk Management. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Kiviniemi, A.; Jones, S.W. A Review of Risk Management through BIM and BIM-Related Technologies. Saf. Sci. 2017, 97, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Won, J.; Cheng, J.C.P. A Financial Decision Making Framework for Construction Projects Based on 5D Building Information Modeling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2016, 34, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2009; ISBN 0273716867. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; Volume s4. [Google Scholar]
- Parylo, O. Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods: An Analysis of Research Design in Articles on Principal Professional Development (1998-2008). Int. J. Mult. Res. Approaches 2012, 6, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, J.W. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Res. Des. 2014, 10, 723954. [Google Scholar]
- Azungah, T. Qualitative Research: Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Data Analysis. Qual. Res. J. 2018, 18, 383–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, B.; Cardon, P.; Poddar, A.; Fontenot, R. Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in IS Research. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2013, 54, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Östlund, U.; Kidd, L.; Wengström, Y.; Rowa-Dewar, N. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research within Mixed Method Research Designs: A Methodological Review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2011, 48, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taherdoost, H. How to Design and Create an Effective Survey/Questionnaire; A Step by Step Guide. Int. J. Acad. Res. Manag. 2016, 5, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Taherdoost, H. What Are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Res. 2022, 5, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etikan, I. Comparision of Snowball Sampling and Sequential Sampling Technique. Biometrics Biostat. Int. J. 2016, 3, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palinkas, L.A.; Horwitz, S.M.; Green, C.A.; Wisdom, J.P.; Duan, N.; Hoagwood, K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 2015, 42, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bujang, M.A.; Omar, E.D.; Baharum, N.A. A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers. Malaysian J. Med. Sci. MJMS 2018, 25, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muratova, A.; Ptukhina, I. BIM as an Instrument of a Conceptual Project Cost Estimation. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Energy, Environmental and Construction Engineering, St. Petersburg, Russia, 19–20 November 2019; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 469–477. [Google Scholar]
- Awosina, A.; Ndihokubwayo, R.; Fapohunda, J. Effects of Inaccurate Cost Estimate on Construction Project Stakeholders. J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov. 2018, 8, 1886–1904. [Google Scholar]
- Porwal, A.; Parsamehr, M.; Szostopal, D.; Ruparathna, R.; Hewage, K. The Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and System Dynamic Modeling to Minimize Construction Waste Generation from Change Orders. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2023, 23, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doloi, H.; Sawhney, A.; Iyer, K.C.; Rentala, S. Analysing Factors Affecting Delays in Indian Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2012, 30, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, A.; Assaf, S.; Hassanain, M.A. Assessment of the Consequences of Deficiencies in Design Documents in Saudi Arabia. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2019, 15, 282–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isaac, S.; Navon, R. A Graph-Based Model for the Identification of the Impact of Design Changes. Autom. Constr. 2013, 31, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younis, G.; Wood, G.; Malak, M.A.A. Minimizing Construction Disputes: The Relationship between Risk Allocation and Behavioural Attitudes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Building Education and Research, Heritance Kandalama, Sri Lanka, 11–15 February 2008; University of Salford: Salford, UK, 2008; pp. 728–740. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, K.V.; Vasugi, V.; Bhat, N. Analysis of Causes of Delay in Indian Construction Projects and Mitigation Measures. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 2019, 24, 58–78. [Google Scholar]
- Patacas, J.; Dawood, N.; Kassem, M. BIM for Facilities Management: A Framework and a Common Data Environment Using Open Standards. Autom. Constr. 2020, 120, 103366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonmez, R.; Ahmadisheykhsarmast, S.; Güngör, A.A. BIM Integrated Smart Contract for Construction Project Progress Payment Administration. Autom. Constr. 2022, 139, 104294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weerapperuma, U.S.; Rathnasinghe, A.P.; Jayasena, H.S.; Wijewickrama, C.S.; Thurairajah, N. A Knowledge Framework for Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contract Adoption in the Construction Industry. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shojaei, A.; Flood, I.; Moud, H.I.; Hatami, M.; Zhang, X. An Implementation of Smart Contracts by Integrating BIM and Blockchain. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, 24–25 October 2019; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 2, pp. 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal Shehzad, H.M.; Binti Ibrahim, R.; Yusof, A.F.; Mohamed Khaidzir, K.A.; Shawkat, S.; Ahmad, S. Recent Developments of BIM Adoption Based on Categorization, Identification and Factors: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2022, 22, 3001–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saka, A.B.; Chan, D.W.M.; Siu, F.M.F. Drivers of Sustainable Adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Nigerian Construction Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability 2020, 12, 3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puolitaival, T.; Booth, T.; Ghaffarian Hoseini, A.; Park, K.S. BIM Education: Case New Zealand. EPiC Ser. Educ. Sci. 2017, 1, 210–218. [Google Scholar]
Cash Flow Management Technique | Description | References |
---|---|---|
Contingency Planning | Planning for unforeseen circumstances that could negatively affect a construction organization’s operations, credibility, or cash flow is crucial. It ensures cash security when anything adverse happens. | [23,24] |
Cash Flow Forecasting (CFF) | To prevent the negative effects of debt, anticipate any cash requirements in advance and take the necessary steps to ensure funds are available. | [3,25] |
Accounts Receivable Management | Clients or customers owe payments to a construction organization for services provided. It includes any outstanding invoices or bills that the organisation is due payment on but has not yet received. | [26,27] |
Earned Value Management (EVM) | EVM integrates measurements of a project’s scope, schedule, and resources to assess its achievement and progress. Planned, Earned, and Actual Values are fundamental for EVM. Regular schedules and cost performance assessments allow for accurate projections of completion dates, budgets, and total project costs. | [28,29] |
S.No | Risks Affecting Cash Flow Forecasting | Description | References |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Poor Design | Design issues result in unanticipated costs and disturbed cash flow, which impacts forecasting. | [5,17] |
2. | Poor Planning | This may lead to incorrect cash flow forecasts, resulting in a mismatch between anticipated and actual expenditures. | [5,17,35] |
3. | Miscommunication | This can result in uncertainty and unanticipated changes in cash flow, hindering forecasts. | [5,21,36] |
4. | Scope Changes | Can lead to unexpected expenses, disrupting cash flow predictions. | [5] |
5. | Project Delays | This can lead to a delay in anticipated cash inflows and an increase in expenses, leading to imprecise cash flow projections. | [5,35] |
6. | Payment Disruptions | Lack of funds or delayed payments can lead to cash flow shortages, which reduce the predictability and efficacy of cash flow forecasts. | [5,35,36] |
7. | Insufficient Expertise | Companies may struggle to effectively anticipate their cash flow without sufficient expertise, resulting in possible financial concerns. | [5,17,37] |
8. | Ineffective Cash Flow Management | Poor cash flow management can lead to unpredictability in financial conditions, limiting cash flow forecasting accuracy. | [5,17,38] |
Category | Country/Location | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Europe | Australia | USA | ||||
Employees | Turnover | Employees | Turnover | Employees | Turnover | |
Micro | 0 to <10 | <EUR 2 million | 0 to <4 | N/A | 0 to 20 | N/A |
Small | 10 to <50 | <EUR 10 million | 5 to <20 | N/A | 20 to 100 | N/A |
Medium | 50 to <250 | <EUR 50 million | 21 to <200 | N/A | 100 to 500 | N/A |
BIM Benefits. | Sources |
---|---|
Enhances accuracy of cost information | [57,58] |
Real-time updates to models for any changes | [57,58] |
Improves communication and collaboration | [14,54] |
Effective decision-making | [59,60] |
Improves cash flow monitoring | [57,60] |
Enhances resource allocation | [58,61] |
Enhances project administration of contract terms | [57,62] |
Overall cost-savings | [22] |
Improve data handling to improve information management | [28] |
Enhances risk mitigation | [63,64] |
Strategy | Description | Author |
---|---|---|
Accessibility to affordable BIM training to enhance the workforce | This strategy contributes to enhancing the skills and knowledge of the workforce by making the transition to BIM more seamless. Investing in training helps in overcoming the initial resistance and skill gaps that hinder BIM adoption | [29] |
Gradual implementation approach for smoother transition to a BIM-integrated organisation | This entails commencing with minor projects and gradually expanding as the organisation becomes more confident with the technology. This approach effectively mitigates the potential for disruption and financial burden on a construction company. | [11,63] |
BIM workshops, seminars, and campaigns for clients, owners, and other project stakeholders | Conducting workshops, seminars, and awareness campaigns for clients, owners, and other stakeholders can foster a better understanding of BIM benefits and practices. These educational initiatives are critical in aligning all parties with the objectives of BIM adoption. | [42,63] |
Government incentivises industry-wide adoption by providing regulations and policies | Government regulations and policies play a pivotal role in encouraging BIM adoption. Incentives such as tax breaks, grants, and subsidies can alleviate the financial burden on construction organisations, promoting industry-wide BIM integration. | [11,65] |
Collaborative partnerships among larger organisations, government entities, and SMEs for knowledge-sharing and mentoring | Forming partnerships between larger organisations, government entities, and facilitates knowledge-sharing and mentorship. These collaborations can provide a construction organisation with access to resources, expertise, and support necessary for successful BIM implementation. | [11,63,65] |
Questionnaire Respondents | ||
---|---|---|
Current Designation | Frequency | Percentage |
Directors/Owners (Construction SMEs) | 5 | 5.00% |
Architects | 3 | 3.00% |
Project Managers | 40 | 40.00% |
Finance Managers | 5 | 5.00% |
BIM Engineers | 17 | 17.00% |
Site Engineers | 2 | 2.00% |
Contract Administrators | 2 | 2.00% |
Quantity Surveyors | 14 | 14.00% |
QA/QC Professionals | 5 | 5.00% |
BIM Modellers | 3 | 3.00% |
Researchers | 4 | 4.00% |
No. | Variable | N of Items | Cronbach’s Alpha | Mean | Standard Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CFF_Prb | 10 | 0.846 | 3.954 | 0.74143 | −1.297 | 1.569 |
2 | BIM_App | 10 | 0.880 | 4.149 | 0.47645 | −0.446 | 0.171 |
3 | BIM_Strat | 5 | 0.850 | 4.418 | 0.50684 | −0.947 | 0.654 |
Code | Challenge | WMR | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
CFF1 | Ineffective cash flow management | 4.28 | 1 |
CFF2 | Scope Changes | 4.22 | 2 |
CFF3 | Project Delays | 4.22 | 3 |
CFF4 | Poor Design | 4.21 | 4 |
CFF5 | Poor Planning | 4.20 | 5 |
CFF6 | Payment Disruptions | 4.17 | 6 |
CFF7 | Insufficient Expertise | 4.13 | 7 |
CFF8 | Miscommunication | 4.05 | 8 |
CFF9 | Insufficient Information | 4.05 | 9 |
CFF10 | Lack of Collaboration | 4.008 | 10 |
Code | Benefits | WMR | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
BIM1 | Enhances accuracy of cost information | 4.43 | 1 |
BIM2 | Improves data handling to improve information management | 4.36 | 2 |
BIM3 | Overall cost-savings | 4.32 | 3 |
BIM4 | Improves communication and collaboration | 4.31 | 4 |
BIM5 | Real-time updates to models for any changes | 4.29 | 5 |
BIM6 | Effective decision-making | 4.29 | 6 |
BIM7 | Improves cash flow monitoring | 4.28 | 7 |
BIM8 | Enhances risk mitigation | 4.23 | 8 |
BIM9 | Enhances resource allocation | 4.22 | 9 |
BIM10 | Enhances project administration of contract terms | 4.19 | 10 |
Code | BIM Application Strategy | WMR | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
STR1 | Accessibility to affordable BIM training to enhance the workforce | 4.58 | 1 |
STR2 | Gradual implementation approach for smoother transition to a BIM integrated organisation | 4.53 | 2 |
STR3 | BIM workshops, seminars, and campaigns for clients, owners, and other project stakeholders | 4.55 | 3 |
STR4 | Government incentivises industry-wide adoption by providing regulations and policies | 4.44 | 4 |
STR5 | Collaborative partnerships among larger organisations, government entities, and SMEs for knowledge-sharing and mentoring | 4.35 | 5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mahboob, A.; Rathnasinghe, A.; Ekanayake, A.; Tennakoon, P. Evaluating BIM’s Role in Transforming Cash Flow Forecasting Among Construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian Narrative. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310221
Mahboob A, Rathnasinghe A, Ekanayake A, Tennakoon P. Evaluating BIM’s Role in Transforming Cash Flow Forecasting Among Construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian Narrative. Sustainability. 2024; 16(23):10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310221
Chicago/Turabian StyleMahboob, Azal, Akila Rathnasinghe, Anushika Ekanayake, and Piyumi Tennakoon. 2024. "Evaluating BIM’s Role in Transforming Cash Flow Forecasting Among Construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian Narrative" Sustainability 16, no. 23: 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310221
APA StyleMahboob, A., Rathnasinghe, A., Ekanayake, A., & Tennakoon, P. (2024). Evaluating BIM’s Role in Transforming Cash Flow Forecasting Among Construction SMEs: A Saudi Arabian Narrative. Sustainability, 16(23), 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310221