Structured Equations to Assess the Socioeconomic and Business Factors Influencing the Financial Sustainability of Traditional Amazonian Chakra in the Ecuadorian Amazon

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Congratulations to the authors, as they present a solid exercise in analyzing the descriptive factors that have a direct effect on sustainability in the Amazonian Chakra. 

The text is publishable in the present form. There is only one issue that does not have a direct effect on the acceptance of the paper, but on its academic repercussion: In section 4.1. the implications on sustainability policies are mentioned. In order to assess this aspect, it would perhaps be interesting to complement the quantitative methodology used with qualitative dynamics that allow access to the background meaning of the question.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer, please see the attached file.

Greetings from the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

The manuscript is very interesting to read, and has a lot of merit. However, I believe that there are some issues that need to be addressed before it can be considered for publication in Sustainability journal. 

I attach a file detailing these observations. 

Kind regards,

The reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, please see the attached file.

Greetings from the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1.     The paper attempts to contextualize its research within the broader field of socioeconomic impacts on traditional Amazonian practices. However, it lacks a comprehensive review of the latest empirical studies that directly relate to financial sustainability in this unique context. A more detailed comparison with current and past theoretical frameworks would enhance the paper's relevance and scholarly contribution.

2.     While many references are pertinent, some do not directly contribute to the core arguments of the paper. A more selective approach to citing literature, focusing on works that directly influence the research questions and hypotheses, is recommended.

3.     The research design and methodologies employed are somewhat vaguely described, making it difficult for readers to fully grasp how the study was conducted. Clarifying these sections, including a more detailed explanation of the structured equations and their application to the study context, would significantly benefit the paper.

4.     The discussion offers insightful observations but occasionally diverges from the central theme of financial sustainability. Ensuring a more consistent focus on how the findings contribute to understanding the socioeconomic factors at play would make the argument more compelling.

5.     The results are presented clearly, with adequate use of tables and figures to illustrate key points. However, integrating these findings more tightly with the discussion section could improve the paper's overall coherence.

6.     The article is well-referenced but would benefit from incorporating more recent studies, especially those published in the last two years, to ensure the research context is up-to-date.

7.     While the conclusions drawn are intriguing, they occasionally leap beyond what the presented results can support. Strengthening the linkage between results and conclusions with additional analysis or discussion would enhance the paper's academic rigor.

 

8.     The paper is understandable but contains grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that hinder its readability. Professional editing is recommended to ensure clarity and maintain academic standards.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The paper is understandable but contains grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that hinder its readability. Professional editing is recommended to ensure clarity and maintain academic standards.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, please see the attached file.

Greetings from the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

Congratulations for this interesting work. 

Best regards,

The reviewer

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have taken all my comments into account. I recommend this article for publication in its current state. 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required.