Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Research on Recycled Apparel Consumption
2.2. Theoretical Background
2.3. Attitudes (ATT) and Purchase Intention (PI)
2.4. Environmental Knowledge (EK) and Attitudes (ATT)
2.5. Product Knowledge (PK) and Attitudes (ATT)
2.6. Perceived Value (PV), Attitudes (ATT), and Purchase Intention (PI)
3. Methodology
3.1. Questionnaire Design and Pre-Testing Study
3.2. Sampling and Data Collection
3.3. Statistical Analysis
- The novelty and complexity of the research model: Our study explored a relatively new context where existing measurement models are not fully established or are inadequate. PLS-SEM is particularly advantageous in such new and complex scenarios, as it allows for the development and refinement of the measurement models in conjunction with the assessment of the structural model [116,117]. This dual capability was crucial for our research, which integrated the KAB model and the TCV.
- The focus on theory development and prediction: Unlike CB-SEM, which is tailored toward theory confirmation and model fitting, PLS-SEM is better suited for theory development and exploratory research [118,119]. This distinction aligns with our study’s objectives of theory expansion and predictive analysis, especially in the context of consumer behavior toward sustainable products.
- Statistical power and model complexity: PLS-SEM provides robust statistical power even with smaller sample sizes and can handle complex models with many constructs and paths. This made it an ideal choice for our study, which involved multiple interrelated constructs within a comprehensive model [118]. Additionally, PLS-SEM does not impose the same stringent distributional assumptions as CB-SEM, which was beneficial given the nature of our data.
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
4.3. Hypothesis Testing
5. Discussion and Conclusions
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Managerial Implications
7. Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. SmartPLS Graphical Presentations
References
- Musova, Z.; Musa, H.; Drugdova, J.; Lazaroiu, G.; Alayasa, J. Consumer attitudes towards new circular models in the fashion industry. J. Compet. 2021, 13, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhana, K.; Kadirgama, K.; Mahamude, A.S.F.; Mica, M.T. Energy consumption, environmental impact, and implementation of renewable energy resources in global textile industries: An overview towards circularity and sustainability. Mater. Circ. Econ. 2022, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, C.; Windsor, F.M.; Munday, M.; Durance, I. Natural or synthetic–how global trends in textile usage threaten freshwater environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 718, 134689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, M. Transition toward green economy: Technological Innovation’s role in the fashion industry. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 37, 100657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centobelli, P.; Abbate, S.; Nadeem, S.P.; Garza-Reyes, J.A. Slowing the fast fashion industry: An all-round perspective. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 38, 100684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China National Textile and Apparel Council. Make Fashion Circular Outlook for a New Textile Economy in China; China National Textile and Apparel Council: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Ray, S.; Nayak, L. Marketing sustainable fashion: Trends and future directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, M.M.; Heinzel, T. Human perceptions of recycled textiles and circular fashion: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, E.M.-H.; Cheung, J.; Leslie, C.A.; Lau, Y.-Y.; Suen, D.W.-S.; Tsang, C.-W. Revolutionizing the Textile and Clothing Industry: Pioneering Sustainability and Resilience in a Post-COVID Era. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, H.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Oh, K.W. Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase intention to sustainable apparel products: Exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Watchravesringkan, K.; Zhou, J.; Gil, M. Sustainable clothing: Perspectives from US and Chinese young Millennials. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 1141–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botwinick, A.; Lu, S. Explore US retailers’ merchandising strategies for clothing made from recycled textile materials. Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2023, 16, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şener, T.; Bişkin, F.; Dündar, N. The effects of perceived value, environmental concern and attitude on recycled fashion consumption. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2022, 27, 595–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.; Jung, H.J.; Lee, Y. Consumers’ Value and Risk Perceptions of Circular Fashion: Comparison between Secondhand, Upcycled, and Recycled Clothing. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Sheng, T.; Zhou, X.; Shen, C.; Fang, B. How Does Young Consumers’ Greenwashing Perception Impact Their Green Purchase Intention in the Fast Fashion Industry? An Analysis from the Perspective of Perceived Risk Theory. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, M.D.; Leary, R.B. It might be ethical, but I won’t buy it: Perceived contamination of, and disgust towards, clothing made from recycled plastic bottles. Psychol. Mark. 2021, 38, 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pretner, G.; Darnall, N.; Testa, F.; Iraldo, F. Are consumers willing to pay for circular products? The role of recycled and second-hand attributes, messaging, and third-party certification. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 175, 105888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaturvedi, P.; Kulshreshtha, K.; Tripathi, V. Investigating the determinants of behavioral intentions of generation Z for recycled clothing: An evidence from a developing economy. Young Consum. 2020, 21, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.J.; Lin, L.M. Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallgren, C.A.; Wood, W. Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of attitude-behavior consistency. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Predieri, S.; Cianciabella, M.; Daniele, G.M.; Gatti, E.; Lippi, N.; Magli, M.; Medoro, C.; Rossi, F.; Chieco, C. Italian Consumers’ Awareness of Climate Change and Willingness to Pay for Climate-Smart Food Products. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owojori, O.M.; Mulaudzi, R.; Edokpayi, J.N. Student’s knowledge, attitude, and perception (KAP) to solid waste management: A survey towards a more circular economy from a rural-based tertiary institution in South Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riskos, K.; Dekoulou, P.; Mylonas, N.; Tsourvakas, G. Ecolabels and the attitude–behavior relationship towards green product purchase: A multiple mediation model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, W.C.H.; Chi, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, V.N.-L.; Xu, X. The influence of social education level on cybersecurity awareness and behaviour: A comparative study of university students and working graduates. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 439–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Q.; Yu, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, J.; Guo, Y.; Li, X. Patients’ and family members’ knowledge, attitudes and perceived family support for SMBG in type 2 diabetes: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e063587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. J. Bus. Res. 1991, 22, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, M.L.; de La Martinière Petroll, M.; Soares, J.C.; Matos, C.A.D.; Hernani-Merino, M. Impulse buying behaviour in omnichannel retail: An approach through the stimulus-organism-response theory. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2023, 51, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebastián-Morillas, A.; Monfort, A.; López-Vázquez, B. Effects of perceived value and customer service on brand satisfaction. J. Promot. Manag. 2024, 30, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boz, Z.; Korhonen, V.; Koelsch Sand, C. Consumer considerations for the implementation of sustainable packaging: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-S.; Liang, C.-H.; Liao, S.-Y.; Kuo, H.-Y. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward food delivery platform services. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Huang, H. Influence of perceived value on consumers’ continuous purchase intention in live-streaming e-commerce—Mediated by consumer trust. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M.J.; Vocino, A.; Grau, S.L.; Garma, R.; Ferdous, A.S. The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. J. Mark. Manag. 2012, 28, 238–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taufique, K.M.R.; Vocino, A.; Polonsky, M.J. The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. J. Strateg. Mark. 2017, 25, 511–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busalim, A.; Fox, G.; Lynn, T. Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2022, 46, 1804–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, T. Consumer perceived value of environmentally friendly apparel: An empirical study of Chinese consumers. J. Text. Inst. 2015, 106, 1038–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diddi, S.; Yan, R.-N.; Bloodhart, B.; Bajtelsmit, V.; McShane, K. Exploring young adult consumers’ sustainable clothing consumption intention-behavior gap: A Behavioral Reasoning Theory perspective. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 18, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okur, N.; Saricam, C.; Iri, A.; Sari, I. Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on sustainable fashion consumption with a model based on consumer value perceptions. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2023, 27, 826–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanrikulu, C. Theory of consumption values in consumer behaviour research: A review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 1176–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, F.; Jung, H.J.; Oh, K.W. Motivators and barriers for buying intention of upcycled fashion products in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Teh, P.L.; Linton, J.D. Impact of environmental knowledge and product quality on student attitude toward products with recycled/remanufactured content: Implications for environmental education and green manufacturing. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña-García, N.; Gil-Saura, I.; Rodríguez-Orejuela, A.; Siqueira-Junior, J.R. Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 2, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onofrei, G.; Filieri, R.; Kennedy, L. Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 142, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwan, M.; Alshurideh, M. The effect of digital marketing on purchase intention: Moderating effect of brand equity. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2022, 6, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maria, S.; Pusriadi, T.; Hakim, Y.P.; Darma, D.C. The effect of social media marketing, word of mouth, and effectiveness of advertising on brand awareness and intention to buy. J. Manaj. Indones. 2019, 19, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 11, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mamary, Y.H.S.; Alraja, M.M. Understanding entrepreneurship intention and behavior in the light of TPB model from the digital entrepreneurship perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2022, 2, 100106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, G.-Z.; Wong, K.-H.; Lau, T.-C.; Lee, J.-H.; Kok, Y.-H. Study of intention to use renewable energy technology in Malaysia using TAM and TPB. Renew. Energy 2024, 221, 119787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandarić, D.; Hunjet, A.; Vuković, D. The Impact of Fashion Brand Sustainability on Consumer Purchasing Decisions. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022, 15, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Kuah, A.T.H.; Lu, Q.; Wong, C.; Thirumaran, K.; Adegbite, E.; Kendall, W. The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK. J. Brand Manag. 2021, 28, 325–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Mishra, S. Luxury fashion consumption in sharing economy: A study of Indian millennials. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2020, 11, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, K.; Lai, C.; Elita, L.; Chang, J. Popularization of sustainable fashion: Barriers and solutions. J. Text. Inst. 2014, 106, 939–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muposhi, A.; Chuchu, T. Influencing millennials to embrace sustainable fashion in an emerging market: A modified brand avoidance model perspective. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2022, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, B. Environmental and Human Impacts of Fast Fashion. Commun. Humanit. Res. 2023, 15, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breen, R. The Evil Fashion Giant: Shein and the Perpetuation of Overconsumption. Available online: https://opentext.ku.edu/environmentalgeopolitics/chapter/evil-fashion-giant-shein/ (accessed on 8 February 2024).
- Abbate, S.; Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Nadeem, S.P.; Riccio, E. Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 2837–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrar, M.; Sibtain, M.M.; Shabbir, R. Understanding purchase intention towards eco-friendly clothing for generation Y & Z. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1997247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, S.H.; Yeap, J.A.L.; Al-Kumaim, N.H. Sustainable Fashion Consumption: Advocating Philanthropic and Economic Motives in Clothing Disposal Behaviour. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, I.; Nekmahmud, M.; Fekete-Farkas, M. How Do Environmental Knowledge, Eco-Label Knowledge, and Green Trust Impact Consumers’ Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Energy-Efficient Household Appliances? Sustainability 2022, 14, 6513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratiwi, N.P.D.K.; Sulhaini, S.; Rinuastuti, B.H. The effect of environmental knowledge, green advertising and environmental attitude toward green purchase intention. Russ. J. Agric. Socio-Econ. Sci. 2018, 78, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gkargkavouzi, A.; Halkos, G.; Matsiori, S. How do motives and knowledge relate to intention to perform environmental behavior? Assessing the mediating role of constraints. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 165, 106394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoah, A.; Addoah, T. Does environmental knowledge drive pro-environmental behaviour in developing countries? Evidence from households in Ghana. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 2719–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andika, A.; Bidayati, U. Unraveling the complexity of the organic food market: Indonesian consumer perspective on price and product knowledge. Asian Manag. Bus. Rev. 2024, 4, 73–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, L.Y.; Chen, C.S. The influence of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions: An empirical study of insurance and catering services in Taiwan. J. Consum. Mark. 2006, 23, 248–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Hazen, B.T. Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 181, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alevizou, P.J.; Oates, C.J.; McDonald, S. The well(s) of knowledge: The decoding of sustainability claims in the UK and in Greece. Sustainability 2015, 7, 8729–8747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samiee, S.; Chabowski, B.R. Knowledge structure in product-and brand origin–related research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 947–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Prakash, G.; Kumar, G. Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahlquist, S.H. How green product demands influence industrial buyer/seller relationships, knowledge, and marketing dynamic capabilities. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 136, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurhayati, T.; Hendar, H. Personal intrinsic religiosity and product knowledge on halal product purchase intention: Role of halal product awareness. J. Islam. Mark. 2020, 11, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harahap, A.; Zuhriyah, A.; Rahmayanti, H.; Nadiroh, N. Relationship between knowledge of green product, social impact and perceived value with green purchase behavior. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 74, 04002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anggara, A.F.N.; Masnita, Y. Functional Theory of the Development of Religiosity and Knowledge on Intention to Purchase Bubble Tea Drinks in Indonesia. J. Ilm. Manaj. Kesatuan 2024, 12, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sriminarti, N.; Nora, L. The role of product knowledge and attitudes toward purchasing intentions: The moderating effect of religiosity on halal cosmetics. KnE Soc. Sci. 2018, 3, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Fernández, R.; Iniesta-Bonillo, M.Á. The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Mark. Theory 2007, 7, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yu, H.; Huang, H. The impact of purchase-decision involvement on purchasing intention: The mediating effect of customer perceived value. In Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM 2017), Shenyang, China, 29–31 December 2017; pp. 850–854. [Google Scholar]
- Raza, M.; Kolmakov, V.; Aziz, A.; Alshebami, A. The Impact of Consumer Perceived Value on Purchase Behaviour in a Developing Country: The Case of Green Products. Creat. Innov. Manag. 2020, 13, 80–99. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.-J.; Ahn, S.-C. The effects of attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention on perceived values in traditional marketplaces. J. Distrib. Sci. 2020, 18, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiao, C.; Zhou, G. Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloch, P.H. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Mark. 1995, 59, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Q.; Zeng, H.; Xiu, X.; Chen, Q. Pull the emotional trigger or the rational string? A multi-group analysis of organic food consumption. Foods 2022, 11, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madadi, R.; Torres, I.M.; Zúñiga, M.Á. The semiotics of emojis in advertising: An integrated quantitative and qualitative examination of emotional versus functional ad dynamics. Psychol. Mark. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundblad, L.; Davies, I.A. The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. J. Consum. Behav. 2016, 15, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, T.; Iqbal, S.; Ayub, A.; Fatima, T.; Rasool, Z. Promoting responsible sustainable consumer behavior through sustainability marketing: The boundary effects of corporate social responsibility and brand image. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, H.M.; Lourenço, T.F.; Silva, G.M. Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1484–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özdil, M. The effect of clothing as a marker on identity. Motif Akad. Halk Bilim. Derg. 2021, 14, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crane, D. Fashion and Its Social Agendas: Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Entwistle, J. The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Barnard, M. Fashion as Communication; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Gwozdz, W.; Gupta, S.; Gentry, J. The Role of Fashion vs. Style Orientation on Sustainable Apparel Consumption: An Update. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Macromarketing Conference: Macromarketing and Academic Activism, Dublin, Ireland, 13–15 July 2016; pp. 639–660. [Google Scholar]
- Sarokin, S.N.; Bocken, N.M.P. Pursuing profitability in slow fashion: Exploring brands’ profit contributors. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 444, 141237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, N.T.; Anh, M.H. Consumer Perception and Behavior in the Context of Sustainable Fashion: A Comprehensive Analysis of Emerging Trends and Impacts. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Sci. 2019, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Wasaya, A.; Saleem, M.A.; Ahmad, J.; Nazam, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Ishfaq, M. Impact of green trust and green perceived quality on green purchase intentions: A moderation study. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 13418–13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Queiroz, F.C.B.P.; Lima, N.C.; da Silva, C.L.; Queiroz, J.V.; de Souza, G.H.S. Purchase intentions for brazilian recycled PET products—Circular economy opportunities. Recycling 2021, 6, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, R.; Lam, A.Y.C.; Lau, M.M. Drivers of green product adoption: The role of green perceived value, green trust and perceived quality. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2015, 25, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Rasool, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, A.I. The Effect of Green Percieved Quality & Risk, Green Trust on Consumer’s and Green Purchased Intention with a Moderation of Environmental Awareness; Research Square: Durham, NC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hasbullah, N.N.; Sulaiman, Z.; Mas’od, A. The effect of perceived value on sustainable fashion consumption in the era of COVID-19: A proposed conceptual framework. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci 2020, 1, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Zaman, S.I.; Rais, M. Measuring student satisfaction through overall quality at business schools: A structural equation modeling: Student satisfaction and quality of education. S. Asian J. Soc. Rev. 2022, 1, 34–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeaheng, Y.; Al-Ansi, A.; Han, H. Impacts of Halal-friendly services, facilities, and food and Beverages on Muslim travelers’ perceptions of service quality attributes, perceived price, satisfaction, trust, and loyalty. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 787–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Alok, S. Drivers of repurchase intention of organic food in India: Role of perceived consumer social responsibility, price, value, and quality. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2022, 34, 246–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Mamun, A.; Rahman, M.K.; Masud, M.M.; Mohiuddin, M. Willingness to pay premium prices for green buildings: Evidence from an emerging economy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 78718–78734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carrión Bósquez, N.G.; Arias-Bolzmann, L.G.; Martínez Quiroz, A.K. The influence of price and availability on university millennials’ organic food product purchase intention. Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, G.; Srivastava, H. Green purchase intention in omnichannel retailing: Role of environmental knowledge and price sensitivity. J. Strateg. Mark. 2023, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ito, K.; Zhang, S. Willingness to pay for clean air: Evidence from air purifier markets in China. J. Political Econ. 2020, 128, 1627–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, B.; Cao, Y.; Xu, X. Product line design and quality differentiation for green and non-green products in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigliardi, B.; Campisi, D.; Ferraro, G.; Filippelli, S.; Galati, F.; Petroni, A. The intention to purchase recycled products: Towards an integrative theoretical framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Likert, R. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 1932. Available online: https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2024).
- Brislin, R.W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1970, 1, 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-S.; Damhorst, M.L. Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 1998, 16, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Liu, C.; Kim, S.H. Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, 37, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, G.; Shiu, E.; Hassan, L.M. Replicating, validating, and reducing the length of the consumer perceived value scale. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preuit, R.; Yan, R.-N.T. Fashion and sustainability: Increasing knowledge about slow fashion through an educational module. In Proceedings of the International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–11 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, E.; Bryman, A.; Harley, B. Business Research Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, K.K.-K. Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-Sem) with Smartpls in 38 Hours; IUniverse: Bloomington, India, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Smith, D.; Reams, R.; Hair, J.F., Jr. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 2014, 5, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hair, J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Al Mamun, A.; Reza, M.N.H.; Yang, M.; Abd Aziz, N. Predicting the significance of consumer environmental values, beliefs, and norms for sustainable fashion behaviors: The case of second-hand clothing. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usman, H.; Projo, N.W.K.; Chairy, C.; Haque, M.G. The role of trust and perceived risk on Muslim behavior in buying halal-certified food. J. Islam. Mark. 2024; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Fang, N.; Ramirez-Asis, E.; Alashker, Y.; Abourehab, M.A.S.; Zhang, K. Mediating Role of Risk Perception and Environmental Quality on the Relationship Between Risk Knowledge and Traveler’s Intention in COVID-19. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 902457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N.P.; Ray, S. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Memon, M.A.; Ramayah, T.; Cheah, J.-H.; Ting, H.; Chuah, F.; Cham, T.H. PLS-SEM statistical programs: A review. J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model. 2021, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, G.; Sarstedt, M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Res. 2019, 29, 430–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falk, R.F.; Miller, N.B. A Primer for Soft Modeling; University of Akron Press: Akron, OH, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Geisser, S. A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 1974, 61, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purwanto, A. Partial Least Squares Structural Squation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Analysis for Social and Management Research: A Literature Review. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res. 2021. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3982764 (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Witte, R.S.; Witte, J.S. Statistics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, R.A.; Wichern, D.W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Latan, H.; Noonan, R.; Matthews, L. Partial least squares path modeling. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Jalil, M.H.; Shaharuddin, S.S. Consumer purchase behavior of eco-fashion clothes as a trend to reduce clothing waste. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 4224–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bong Ko, S.; Jin, B. Predictors of purchase intention toward green apparel products: A cross-cultural investigation in the USA and China. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2017, 21, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicente-Molina, M.A.; Fernández-Sáinz, A.; Izagirre-Olaizola, J. Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 61, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaiswal, D.; Kant, R. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleim, M.; Lawson, S.J. Spanning the gap: An examination of the factors leading to the green gap. J. Consum. Mark. 2014, 31, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saepudin, D.; Shojaei, A.S.; Barbosa, B.; Pedrosa, I. Intention to Purchase Eco-Friendly Handcrafted Fashion Products for Gifting and Personal Use: A Comparison of National and Foreign Consumers. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Shu, S.; Shao, J.; Booth, E.; Morrison, A.M. Innovative or not? The effects of consumer perceived value on purchase intentions for the palace museum’s cultural and creative products. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, M. The impact of green perceived value and its additional multidimensional expanded variables effect on customer attitude and purchasing intention for buying green food products: A case of Pakistan. J. Organ. Bus. 2021, 2, 24–42. [Google Scholar]
- Alsaid, K.N.; Saleh, M.A.H. Perceived value and purchase intention of counterfeit luxury brands: Testing the moderation of materialism. Amity J. Mark. 2019, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Hamari, J.; Hanner, N.; Koivisto, J. “Why pay premium in freemium services?” A study on perceived value, continued use and purchase intentions in free-to-play games. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 51, 102040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.-J.; Divita, L.; Kim, H.-Y. Environmental awareness on bamboo product purchase intentions: Do consumption values impact green consumption? Int. J. Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2013, 6, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A.; Roy, M. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: Testing the structural model. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 95, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bei, L.-T.; Simpson, E.M. The Determinants of Consumers’ Purchase Decisions for Recycled Products: An Application of Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory. Adv. Consum. Res. 1995, 22, 257. [Google Scholar]
- Lou, X.; Chi, T.; Janke, J.; Desch, G. How Do Perceived Value and Risk Affect Purchase Intention toward Second-Hand Luxury Goods? An Empirical Study of U.S. Consumers. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Lee, J. The effects of consumers’ perceived values on intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Item Number | Item Content | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Environmental Knowledge | EK1 | I know microfiber pollution is related to the textile and apparel industry | Kim and Damhorst (1998) [111] |
EK2 | I know the textile and apparel industry is a large contributor to greenhouse gas emissions | ||
EK3 | I know consumers contribute to the environmental issues associated with the apparel industry | ||
Product Knowledge | PK1 | I am quite familiar with recycled apparel | Kang et al. (2013) [112] |
PK2 | I know which brands sell recycled apparel | ||
PK3 | I can easily determine where I can purchase recycled apparel | ||
Perceived Emotional Value | PEV1 | Recycled apparel would make me feel good | Walsh et al. (2014) [113] |
PEV2 | Recycled apparel would give me pleasure | ||
PEV3 | Recycled apparel would make me want to use them | ||
PEV4 | Recycled apparel are the ones that I would enjoy | ||
Perceived Social Value | PSV1 | Recycled apparel would improve the way I am perceived | Walsh et al. (2014) [113] |
PSV2 | Recycled apparel would give their owner social approval | ||
PSV3 | Recycled apparel would make a good impression on other people | ||
PSV4 | Recycled apparel would help me to feel acceptable | ||
Perceived Quality Value | PQV1 | Recycled apparel is well-made | Walsh et al. (2014) [113] |
PQV2 | Recycled apparel has an acceptable standard of quality | ||
PQV3 | Recycled apparel would last a long time | ||
PQV4 | Recycled apparel has consistent quality | ||
PQV5 | Recycled apparel would perform consistently | ||
Perceived Price Value | PPV1 | Recycled apparel would be economical | Walsh et al. (2014) [113] |
PPV2 | Recycled apparel is reasonably priced | ||
PPV3 | Recycled apparel offers value for money | ||
PPV4 | Recycled apparel is good for the price | ||
Attitude | ATT1 | My attitude toward purchasing recycled apparel is very positive | Preuit and Yan (2016) [114] |
ATT2 | I think purchasing recycled apparel is very favorable for me | ||
ATT3 | I think purchasing recycled apparel is a pleasant choice | ||
Purchase Intention | PI1 | In the future, I intend to purchase recycled apparel | Preuit and Yan (2016) [114] |
PI2 | In the future, I will tell my friends about the recycled apparel | ||
PI3 | I will prioritize recycled over fast-fashion apparel |
Characteristic | Category | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 359 | 50.1 |
Female | 357 | 49.9 | |
Age | 18–25 | 146 | 20.4 |
26–35 | 287 | 40.1 | |
36–45 | 195 | 27.2 | |
46–55 | 69 | 9.6 | |
56–65 | 16 | 2.2 | |
>65 | 3 | 0.4 | |
Income (CNY) | <1000 | 206 | 28.8 |
1000–3000 | 231 | 32.2 | |
3001–5000 | 106 | 14.8 | |
5001–8000 | 81 | 11.3 | |
8001–10,000 | 41 | 5.7 | |
10,001–20,000 | 17 | 2.4 | |
>20,000 | 34 | 4.8 | |
Educational Level | Junior high school | 133 | 18.6 |
Senior high school | 189 | 26.4 | |
College diploma | 235 | 32.8 | |
Bachelor’s degree | 140 | 19.6 | |
Master’s degree | 19 | 2.7 | |
Occupation | Government employees | 64 | 8.9 |
Business managers | 69 | 9.6 | |
Office workers | 144 | 20.1 | |
Professionals | 31 | 4.3 | |
Factory workers | 90 | 12.6 | |
Salesperson | 25 | 3.5 | |
Self-employed | 111 | 15.5 | |
Agricultural workers | 19 | 2.7 | |
Retired | 23 | 3.2 | |
No occupation | 28 | 3.9 | |
Current students | 112 | 15.7 |
Construct | Item | Factor Loading | VIF | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EK | EK1 | 0.733 | 1.18 | 0.792 | 0.56 |
EK2 | 0.708 | 1.231 | |||
EK3 | 0.8 | 1.235 | |||
PK | PK1 | 0.765 | 1.308 | 0.8 | 0.571 |
PK2 | 0.769 | 1.224 | |||
PK3 | 0.732 | 1.201 | |||
PEV | PEV1 | 0.774 | 1.517 | 0.838 | 0.565 |
PEV2 | 0.76 | 1.49 | |||
PEV3 | 0.713 | 1.301 | |||
PEV4 | 0.757 | 1.459 | |||
PSV | PSV1 | 0.718 | 1.43 | 0.821 | 0.534 |
PSV2 | 0.721 | 1.309 | |||
PSV3 | 0.744 | 1.398 | |||
PSV4 | 0.738 | 1.402 | |||
PQV | PQV1 | 0.75 | 1.534 | 0.846 | 0.524 |
PQV2 | 0.711 | 1.47 | |||
PQV3 | 0.72 | 1.426 | |||
PQV4 | 0.715 | 1.44 | |||
PQV5 | 0.722 | 1.503 | |||
PPV | PPV1 | 0.776 | 1.531 | 0.836 | 0.561 |
PPV2 | 0.717 | 1.422 | |||
PPV3 | 0.726 | 1.371 | |||
PPV4 | 0.774 | 1.568 | |||
ATT | ATT1 | 0.826 | 1.545 | 0.838 | 0.633 |
ATT2 | 0.796 | 1.445 | |||
ATT3 | 0.763 | 1.281 | |||
PI | PI1 | 0.786 | 1.378 | 0.824 | 0.609 |
PI2 | 0.761 | 1.235 | |||
PI3 | 0.795 | 1.417 |
ATT | EK | PEV | PI | PK | PPV | PQV | PSV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | |||||||
EK | 0.623 | ||||||
PEV | 0.827 | 0.696 | |||||
PI | 0.832 | 0.713 | 0.838 | ||||
PK | 0.801 | 0.757 | 0.712 | 0.846 | |||
PPV | 0.842 | 0.731 | 0.753 | 0.725 | 0.68 | ||
PQV | 0.744 | 0.716 | 0.821 | 0.799 | 0.818 | 0.808 | |
PSV | 0.756 | 0.764 | 0.782 | 0.682 | 0.798 | 0.84 | 0.785 |
Hypothesis Number | Path | Path Coefficient | T-Statistic | p-Value | LLCI (5.00%) | ULCI (95.00%) | Supported |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | ATT → PI | 0.273 | 5.427 | 0 | 0.188 | 0.352 | Yes |
H2 | EK → ATT | 0.066 | 1.914 | 0.028 | 0.01 | 0.124 | Yes |
H3 | PK → ATT | 0.023 | 0.564 | 0.287 | −0.039 | 0.092 | No |
H4a | PEV → ATT | 0.158 | 3.129 | 0.001 | 0.074 | 0.241 | Yes |
H4b | PEV → PI | 0.123 | 2.598 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 0.201 | Yes |
H5a | PSV → ATT | 0.13 | 2.239 | 0.013 | 0.031 | 0.226 | Yes |
H5b | PSV → PI | 0.134 | 2.665 | 0.004 | 0.053 | 0.219 | Yes |
H6a | PQV → ATT | 0.263 | 4.282 | 0 | 0.157 | 0.359 | Yes |
H6b | PQV → PI | 0.206 | 3.583 | 0 | 0.114 | 0.301 | Yes |
H7a | PPV → ATT | 0.267 | 4.706 | 0 | 0.175 | 0.364 | Yes |
H7b | PPV → PI | 0.176 | 3.293 | 0 | 0.087 | 0.264 | Yes |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jin, X.; Omar, A.; Fu, K. Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093633
Jin X, Omar A, Fu K. Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(9):3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093633
Chicago/Turabian StyleJin, Xiaofang, Azizah Omar, and Kai Fu. 2024. "Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China" Sustainability 16, no. 9: 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093633
APA StyleJin, X., Omar, A., & Fu, K. (2024). Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16(9), 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093633