Next Article in Journal
Sustainability and Stakeholder Engagement in Building Information Modelling-Enabled Construction: A Review of Critical Success Factors in Design and Planning Phases
Previous Article in Journal
Productivity and Profitability of Maize-Mungbean and Maize-Chili Pepper Relay Intercropping Systems for Income Diversification and Soil Fertility in Southern Benin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entrepreneurship and Corporate ESG Performance—A Case Study of China’s A-Share Listed Companies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies

1
Business College, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
College of Letters & Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
3
School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China
4
College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 26 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 28 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Economic Development)

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of the global economy, promoting corporate economic development while taking into account sustainable development has gradually become the focus of attention of countries around the world. The ESG performance reflects the differences in the assessment of enterprises’ sustainable development potential by capital market information intermediaries. These differences affect the internal governance and external financing of enterprises, thereby influencing corporate green innovation. This research is based on 1500 Shanghai-Shenzhen A-share listed companies in China from 2012 to 2022. Using green technology innovation quantity (GINUM) and green technology innovation quality (GICIT) as the measures of corporate green innovation capabilities, and by constructing a DiD model and a benchmark regression model, the dynamic relationship between ESG performance and green innovation is explored. At the same time, the mediation effect model is introduced to examine the impact of ESG performance on corporate green innovation capabilities from three perspectives: financing constraints, management’s green development awareness, and employee innovation efficiency. In addition, endogenous analysis methods and robustness test methods are employed to further ensure the reliability of the research results. The research findings show that ESG performance can significantly promote corporate green innovation capabilities. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that ESG performance significantly enhances the green technology innovation capabilities of enterprises, especially among non-state-owned small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and enterprises in the eastern region. The regression coefficients for GINUM and GICIT are 0.019, 0.021, 0.084, and 0.086, respectively, all of which are statistically significant at the 1% level. The mechanism analysis shows that in terms of alleviating financing constraints, enhancing management’s green development awareness, and improving employee innovation efficiency, the regression coefficients of ESG performance for GINUM and GICIT are −1.559, −1.953, 0.018, 0.011, 0.427, and 0.495, respectively, indicating a certain promoting effect. The results of this study enrich and expand the relevant research on the relationship between ESG and corporate green innovation capabilities to a certain extent. This research is expected to provide some new practical directions for promoting green innovation capabilities within the ESG framework.
Keywords: ESG performance; green technology innovation capability; GINUM; GICIT; difference-in-differences model; mediation effect model ESG performance; green technology innovation capability; GINUM; GICIT; difference-in-differences model; mediation effect model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, K.; Cao, Z.; Tang, S.; Hu, C.; Zhang, M. Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085

AMA Style

Liang K, Cao Z, Tang S, Hu C, Zhang M. Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies. Sustainability. 2025; 17(3):1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Kun, Zhihong Cao, Sheng Tang, Chunguang Hu, and Maomao Zhang. 2025. "Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies" Sustainability 17, no. 3: 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085

APA Style

Liang, K., Cao, Z., Tang, S., Hu, C., & Zhang, M. (2025). Evaluating the Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance on Green Technology Innovation: Based on Chinese A-Share Listed Companies. Sustainability, 17(3), 1085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop