Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The cavitation effect. Ultrasonic waves generate local pressure changes in the solution or medium surrounding the material, which leads to the formation and implosion of gas bubbles in the liquid (this process is called cavitation). The implosion of bubbles generates intense micro-streams and micro-impacts, which can as a result trigger the following:
- −
- Damage the cell walls of the potato, increasing the permeability of cell membranes and facilitating the exchange of nutrients and water;
- −
- Improved cell permeability. As a result of ultrasound, the structure of potato cells is slightly damaged, which leads to increased permeability of cell membranes. This results in, among other things, better water and nutrient uptake by tubers, which can consequently contribute to improved plant growth and increased tuber yields; -reduced cellular resistance to processes such as cooking or frying, which affects the consistency and texture of French fries [1,2,5,7].
- Changes in the chemical composition of potatoes. Ultrasound treatment can affect the physicochemical properties of the raw material, such as the dry matter, starch, soluble and reducing sugars, and proteins, which are crucial for the heat treatment process (e.g., frying French fries). For example, a reduced content of reducing sugars, which reduces the risk of excessive browning of French fries during frying, and thus improves their appearance and taste; an increased availability of starch, which can ultimately contribute to improving the texture of French fries, giving them a more desirable, crispy consistency after heat treatment [6].
- Increased enzymatic activity. Ultrasound can also affect the activity of enzymes present in potato tubers. Cavitation and the micro-streams generated as a result of this process can modify enzymes responsible for the ripening and storage of potatoes, which can -reduce the accumulation of reducing sugars during long-term storage of potato tubers, minimizing their negative impact on the quality of French fries; improve metabolic processes in tubers, promoting uniform ripening and a better quality of potatoes after the harvest.
- Increased efficiency of heat treatment: Thanks to increased cell permeability and changes in the chemical structure of potatoes, ultrasonic treatment can contribute to more uniform heat treatment (e.g., frying). Increased absorption of water and nutrients helps to shorten the frying time of French fries, which in turn reduces the risk of harmful substances such as acrylamides, formed as a result of long-term frying at high temperatures, or maintains the uniform structure of French fries, which in turn affects their final sensory quality—French fries become crispier on the outside and softer on the inside, by modulating factors such as texture and color [6,8].
- Impacts on water retention. Ultrasonic treatment can also affect water retention in potato tubers, which is crucial when frying French fries. Better water retention means less loss of French fries mass during frying, which leads to the production of French fries with a more desirable texture. As a result, the amount of fat absorbed by French fries during frying is reduced, which in turn affects their health and taste values.
- −
- Increasing agricultural production efficiency: The use of ultrasound can improve the quality of tubers, enhance their germination capacity, and contribute to more efficient use of resources such as water, fertilizers, and crop protection products. More efficient production means reduced resource consumption while maintaining or increasing yields, supporting a sustainable approach to agriculture.
- −
- Reduction in chemical crop protection products: The impact of ultrasound on tubers can reduce the need for chemical plant protection products, leading to lower environmental pollution and healthier agricultural products for consumers.
- −
- Supporting biodiversity: Reducing chemical protection agents and optimizing cultivation methods can positively impact biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems, contributing to the protection of pollinating insects and beneficial organisms.
- −
- Conservation of natural resources: Research on technologies like ultrasound supports a more precise approach to resource management, which is crucial in the context of climate change and the limited availability of water and arable land.
- −
- Promoting scientific innovation: The application of ultrasound in agriculture exemplifies the integration of modern technologies with traditional farming practices. The development of such methods can lead to new tools for measuring, monitoring, and quantifying sustainable development in agriculture.
- −
- Socio-economic benefits: Improving agricultural production efficiency and reducing costs associated with chemical crop protection products can result in better income for farmers, particularly in resource-constrained regions. Additionally, minimizing the negative environmental impact promotes the health and well-being of local communities.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Field Tests
2.2. Experimental Methods for Preparing Seed Potato Tubers
2.3. Laboratory Tests
2.3.1. Determination of Chemical Composition
2.3.2. Quality Assessment of French Fries
2.3.3. Soil Sampling and Determination
2.4. Soil Conditions
2.5. Meteorological Conditions
2.6. Statistical Calculations
3. Results
3.1. Chemical Composition of Tubers
3.1.1. Dry Matter and Starch Content
3.1.2. Sugar Content
3.2. French Fries Quality
3.2.1. French Fries Color
3.2.2. Visual Assessment of French Fries
3.2.3. Consistency of French Fries
3.2.4. Taste and Smell of French Fries
3.2.5. Fat Content in French Fries
3.2.6. French Fries Defects
3.3. Descriptive Statistics of Tuber and French Fries Features
3.4. Relationship Between French Fries Quality and Chemical Composition of Tubers
4. Discussion
4.1. The Effect of Ultrasound on the Quality of Raw Material and French Fries
4.2. Genetic Features and Quality of French Fries
4.3. Reaction of Varieties to Ultrasound
4.4. The Influence of the Environment on the Quality of Raw Material and French Fries
4.5. French Fries Quality and Chemical Composition of Tubers
4.6. Practical Implications
4.7. Limitations of Ultrasound Technology
- Technological limitations:
- −
- Equipment cost: Ultrasound-generating devices can be expensive to purchase and maintain, which can be an economic barrier, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises.
- −
- Process scalability: The effectiveness of ultrasound on a small laboratory scale may not be fully translated to an industrial scale. Further research is needed to scale up the technology.
- −
- Precise parameter settings: The effectiveness of ultrasound depends on the precise selection of parameters such as frequency, intensity, and duration of operation. Incorrect settings can lead to damage to the potato structure or insufficient effects.
- Raw material limitations:
- −
- Differences in potato varieties: Individual potato varieties differ in starch content, moisture content, or texture, which can impact the effectiveness of ultrasound.
- −
- Seasonality and raw material quality: Potatoes stored for a long time may have a changed structure (e.g., increased content of reducing sugars), which may affect the interaction with ultrasound.
- Potential product quality issues:
- −
- Impact on structure and texture: Excessive exposure to ultrasound may lead to the destruction of the cellular structure of potatoes, which may negatively affect the texture of the fries after frying.
- −
- Sensory changes: Some ultrasound parameters may cause changes in the taste, smell, or color of the fries, which could reduce their acceptance by consumers.
- −
- Uneven effect: On a large industrial scale, ultrasound may not act evenly on the entire raw material, resulting in variable quality of the final product.
- Health and regulatory constraints:
- −
- Process safety: Ultrasound technology must be carefully assessed for food safety. Potential changes in chemical structure may require further studies on the impact on consumer health.
- −
- Regulatory compliance: In some countries, the use of ultrasound in food processing may require additional certifications or compliance with specific regulations.
- Environmental constraints:
- −
- Energy consumption: Ultrasound-based processes can require significant amounts of electrical energy, which can increase operating costs and the environmental burden.
- −
- Waste generation: Ultrasound can cause increased cell sap secretion, leading to additional production of liquid waste requiring disposal.
- Need for further research:
- −
- Lack of sufficient data: Ultrasound technology in potato processing for French fries is new, and therefore there is limited research on its long-term effects and optimal parameters.
- −
- Unpredictable effects: The introduction of ultrasound can lead to unexpected physicochemical interactions that need to be thoroughly investigated.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chemat, F.; Zill-e-Huma; Khan, M.K. Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 813–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Hidvégi, N.; Gulyás, A.; Tóth, B.; Dobránszki, J. Transcriptomic Response of In Vitro Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to Piezoelectric Ultrasound. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2020, 38, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Śliwiński, A. Ultrasound and Their Applications; WNT: Warszawa, Poland, 2001; p. 426. [Google Scholar]
- Kentish, S.; Feng, H. Applications of Power Ultrasound in Food Processing. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 263–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maksymiec, M.; Frąckiewicz, A.; Stasiak, D.M. Ultrasonic assisted production of food. In Review of Selected Issues in the Field of the Food Industry; Szala, M., Kropiwiec, K., Eds.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe TYGIEL: Lublin, Poland, 2016; pp. 199–213. [Google Scholar]
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B. Ultrasound Application in Potato Cultivation: Potential for Enhanced Yield and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2024, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lachman, J.; Hamouz, K.; Musilová, J. Effect of variety and environment on the Maillard reaction products in potato tubers during frying. Food Chem. 2020, 312, 126068. [Google Scholar]
- van de Loon, V. Process Innovation and Quality Aspects of French Fries. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2005; p. 156. [Google Scholar]
- Grudzińska, M.; Zgórska, K. Wpływ zawartości cukrów redukujących w bulwach ziemniaka na jakość frytek i chipsów. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość 2008, 3, 20–29. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Singh, J.; Mehta, S. Post-harvest sugar accumulation in potatoes: Effect on processing and quality of potato chips and French fries. Potato Res. 2019, 62, 55–75. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, B.; Sharma, R.; Kumar, R. Influence of cultivar and processing conditions on the acrylamide formation in potato fries: A review. Food Control 2021, 125, 107991. [Google Scholar]
- Duer, I.; Fotyma, M.; Madej, A. Code of Good Agricultural Practice; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Warsaw, Poland, 2004; p. 93. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Bleinholder, H.; Buhr, L.; Feller, C.; Hack, H.; Hess, M.; Klose, R.; Meier, U.; Stauss, R.; van den Boom, T.; Weber, E.; et al. Compendium of Growth Stage Identification Keys for Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants; IOR: Poznań, Poland, 2005; pp. 15–33. [Google Scholar]
- Lenartowicz, T. Potato. Methodology for Testing the Suitability of Varieties for the Production of French Fries and Chips; COBORU: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2015; p. 8. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Roztropowicz, S.; Czerko, Z.; Głuska, A.; Goliszewski, W.; Gruczek, T.; Lis, B.; Lutomirska, B.; Nowacki, W.; Rykaczewska, K.; Sowa-Niedziałkowska, G.; et al. Methodic of Observation, Measurements and Sample Take in Agricultural Experiments with Potato; Plant Breeding Acclimatization Institute, Section: Jadwisin, Poland, 1999; p. 50. [Google Scholar]
- Polish Standard PN-IEC 6003; Standard Voltages IEC. ASLAN Electrical Publishing: Franklin, MA, USA, 1999. Available online: www.aslan.com (accessed on 18 June 2018).
- Baryłko-Pikielna, N.; Matuszewska, I. Sensory Food Research. Basics—Methods—Applications, 2nd ed.; Scientific Publishers PTTŻ: Krakow, Poland, 2014; p. 375. ISBN 978-83-935421-3-0. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC. The official methods of analysis of AOAC International by George W. Latimer, 20th ed. 2016, p. 3172. Available online: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/ (accessed on 18 June 2018).
- EN ISO 8586: 2014; Sensory Analysis—General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Sensory Evaluation Experts. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. Available online: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-iso-8586-2014-03e.html (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Mozolewski, W. Research on Relations between the Quality of Potato Cultivars and the Quality of PC and FF; Monogr.; Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski: Olsztyn, Poland, 2005; p. 77. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Krełowska-Kułas, M. Badanie Jakości Produktów Spożywczych; Państ. Wyd. Ekonom.: Warszawa, Poland, 1993; pp. 53–55. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Polish Standard. PN-R-BS 0403; Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil Sampling. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1997. (In Polish)
- KQ/PB-34, Version 4; Polish Accreditation Center: Warsaw, Poland, 2021. (In Polish)
- PN-R-04023; In Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil. Determination of Available Phosphorus Content in Mineral Soils. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1996. (In Polish)
- PN-R-04020, 1994+AZ1; In Chemical and Agricultural Analysis of Soil. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warszawa, Poland, 2004. (In Polish)
- WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports 106; Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Rybarczyk, J. Instructions for Conducting Meteorological Observations at the Variety Evaluation Experimental Stations; COBORU: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2000; p. 31. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Skowera, B.; Kopcińska, J.; Kopeć, B. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. 2014, 46, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cook, R.D.; Weisberg, S. An Introduction to Regression Graphics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koronacki, J. Statistics, for Students of Technical and Natural Sciences; WNT: Warsaw, Poland, 2009; p. 491. ISBN 83-204-2994-3. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Fiselier, K.; Bazzocco, D.; Gama-Baumgartner, F.; Grob, K. Influence of the frying temperature on acrylamide formation in French fries. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 222, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grudzińska, M.; Zgórska, K. The effect of environmental conditions on the content of reducing sugars in potato tubers. J. Food Qual. 2010, 33, 241–250. [Google Scholar]
- Sawicka, B.; Barbaś, P. Zależność plonowania ziemniaków od warunków meteorologicznych w wybranych mezoregionach Polski południowo-wschodniej. Nauka Przyr. Technol. 2015, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kita, A.; Lisińska, G.; Gołubowska, G. The effects of oil and frying temperatures on the texture and fat content of potato crisps. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedreschi, F. Fried and dehydrated potato products. In Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology, 1st ed.; Singh, J., Kaur, L., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1999; p. 507. [Google Scholar]
- Pedreschi, F.; Moyano, P.; Kaack, K.; Granby, K. The effect of asparaginase on acrylamide formation in French fries. Food Chem. 2020, 123, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhargavaa, N.; Mora, R.S.; Kumarb, K.; Sharanagat, V.S. Advances in application of ultrasound in food processing: A review. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2021, 70, 105293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sobol, Z.; Baran, D.; Norbert Marks, N. Relationships between volume and shape of selected species of potato bulbs. Inżynieria Rol. 2005, 7, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, B.; Sablani, S.S. Influence of processing conditions on the texture and microstructure of potato chips. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1634–1642. [Google Scholar]
- Kazimierczak, R.; Pobereżny, J.; Lech, W. Impact of potato tuber composition on the quality of processed potato products: A review. Food Chem. 2020, 370, 130973. [Google Scholar]
- Leszczyński, W. Frytki i chipsy—technologia i jakość. Przemysł Spożywczy 2002, 9, 12–18. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, W. Influence of storage conditions on sugar content and fry color of potato varieties used for processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, X. Effects of ultrasound pretreatment on potato structure and frying characteristics. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 44, e13563. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Wouwer, B.; Brijs, K.; Wouters, A.G.B.; Raes, K. The effect of ultrasound on the extraction and foaming properties of proteins from potato trimmings. Food Chem. 2024, 455, 139877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Lyu, X.; Aadil, R.M.; Tong, Y.; Zhao, W.; Yang, R. Microwave heating instead of blanching to produce low-fat French fries. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 84, 103298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawicka, B.; Pszczółkowski, P. Dry matter and carbohydrates content in the tubers of very early potato varieties cultivated under coverage. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2005, 4, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
- Struik, P.C.; Wiersema, S.G. Seed Potato Technology; Wageningen Pers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1999; p. 383. ISBN 90-74134-65-3. [Google Scholar]
- Romani, S.; Bacchiocca, M.; Rocculi, P.; Rosa, M.D. Effects of frying conditions on acrylamide content in French fries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 54, 2495–2525. [Google Scholar]
- Acurio, L.; Salazar, D.; García, M.E.; García-Segovia, P.; Martínez-Monzó, J.; Igual, M. Characterization, mathematical modeling of moisture sorption isotherms and bioactive compounds of Andean root flours. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024, 8, 100752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamgordani, P.A.; Firouz, M.S.; Omid, M.; Hadidi, N.; Aghajani, P.F. Dual-Stage ultrasound in deep frying of potato chips; effects on the oil absorption and the quality of fried chips. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2024, 103, 106779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Year of Research | Macronutrients [mg·100 g−1 soil] | Humus Content [g·kg−1] | pH [in KCL] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | K | Mg | |||
2015 | 8.9 | 10.9 | 7.8 | 0.94 | 5.9 |
2016 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 1.06 | 5.8 |
2017 | 10.6 | 9.8 | 6.3 | 1.03 | 6.6 |
Mean | 9.3 | 9.9 | 7.0 | 1.02 | - |
Factors of the Experiment | Starch | Dry Matter | Total Soluble Sugars | Reducing Sugars | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technologies | Control object | 14.3 a * | 20.7 a | 1.07 a | 0.53 a |
Ultrasounds | 14.5 a | 21.0 a | 1.03 a | 0.52 a | |
LSDp0.05 | ns ** | ns | ns | ns | |
Cultivars | ‘Denar’ ‘Lord’ ‘Owacja’ ‘Vineta’ ‘Satina’ ‘Tajfun’ ‘Syrena’ ‘Zagłoba’ | 13.0 a 12.9 a 14.1 b 14.4 b 14.6 b 17.3 d 16.1 c 12.9 a | 18.8 a 19.6 ba 20.4 bca 20.8 bc 21.4 dc 23.7 e 23.0 de 19.4 ba | 1.17 de 1.07 db 1.22 de 0.9 ab 0.98 da 0.84 ab 0.74 a 1.45 e | 0.64 cd 0.62 c 0.62 c 0.48 b 0.54 cb 0.29 a 0.31 a 0.74 d |
LSDp0.05 | 0.63 | 1.78 | 0.30 | 0.12 | |
Years | 2015 2016 2017 | 16.2 c 13.1 a 13.9 b | 22.4 b 19.8 a 20.4 a | 0.60 a 2.05 b 0.48 a | 0.34 a 0.93 b 0.33 a |
Mean | 14.4 | 20.9 | 1.05 | 0.53 | |
LSDp0.05 | 0.30 | 0.81 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
Factors of the Experiment | Assessment Parameters on the 5° Scale | Content of Fat (%) | Assessment Parameters on % | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Visual Assessment | Consistency | Taste and Smell | Humidity | Dark Ends | |||
Technologies | Traditional | 3.98 a * | 3.67 a | 3.30 a | 3.97 a | 18.03 b | 2.65 b | 0.94 b |
With Ultrasound | 4.18 b | 3.84 b | 3.66 b | 4.22 b | 17.84 a | 2.51 a | 0.56 a | |
LSDp0.05 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.34 | |
Cultivars | ‘Denar’ | 3.65 b | 3.19 b | 2.67 a | 4.11 b | 18.30 b | 2.81 cd | 0.33 a |
‘Lord’ | 3.72 b | 3.27 b | 2.86 ab | 3.92 b | 18.22 b | 2.64 bcd | 1.0 ab | |
‘Owacja’ | 4.20 c | 3.22 b | 3.22 b | 3.92 b | 17.98 b | 2.61 abc | 1.44 b | |
‘Vineta’ | 4.53 d | 4.56 d | 4.36 d | 4.75 c | 17.96 b | 2.44 abc | 0.25 a | |
‘Satina’ | 4.04 c | 3.83 c | 3.78 c | 4.17 b | 17.65 a | 2.44 ab | 1.72 b | |
‘Tajfun’ | 4.83 e | 4.72 d | 4.25 cd | 4.78 c | 17.11 a | 2.31 a | 0.33 a | |
‘Syrena’ | 4.85 e | 4.92 d | 4.31 cd | 4.94 c | 17.92 b | 2.47 ab | 0.00 a | |
‘Zagłoba’ | 2.82 a | 2.31 a | 2.39 a | 2.14 a | 18.47 b | 2.94 d | 0.89 ab | |
LSDp0.05 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.72 | 0.31 | 1.06 | |
Years | 2015 | 4.62 c | 4.23 c | 3.80 b | 4.11 ab | 17.65 a | 3.22 b | 0.10 a |
2016 | 3.44 a | 3.09 a | 2.81 a | 3.93 a | 18.18 b | 2.30 a | 1.84 b | |
2017 | 4.17 b | 3.93 b | 3.82 b | 4.23 b | 17.96 b | 2.23 a | 0.29 a | |
Mean | 4.08 | 3.75 | 3.48 | 4.09 | 17.93 | 2.58 | 0.75 | |
LSDp0.05 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.50 |
Specification | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 4.08 | 3.75 | 3.48 | 2.58 | 17.93 | 0.75 | 4.09 | 14.40 | 20.87 | 1.05 | 0.53 |
Standard error | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
Median | 4.40 | 4.00 | 3.50 | 2.50 | 17.96 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 14.00 | 20.60 | 0.72 | 0.46 |
Standard deviation | 0.96 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.08 | 2.19 | 2.30 | 0.76 | 0.33 |
Kurtosis | 0.17 | −0.34 | −1.25 | −0.92 | 2.42 | 3.17 | 0.65 | −0.36 | −0.50 | −1.10 | −1.08 |
Skewness | −1.06 | −0.82 | −0.11 | 0.15 | −0.15 | 2.12 | −1.15 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.48 |
Range | 3.40 | 4.65 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5.10 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 9.80 | 9.65 | 2.41 | 1.06 |
Minimum | 1.60 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 14.60 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 10.00 | 16.00 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
Maximum | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 19.70 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 19.80 | 25.65 | 2.59 | 1.15 |
Coefficient of variation V | 23.52 | 33.20 | 34.11 | 23.45 | 4.07 | 103.14 | 26.45 | 15.24 | 11.04 | 72.86 | 63.15 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B.; Skiba, D.; Barbaś, P. Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques. Sustainability 2025, 17, 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030828
Pszczółkowski P, Sawicka B, Skiba D, Barbaś P. Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques. Sustainability. 2025; 17(3):828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030828
Chicago/Turabian StylePszczółkowski, Piotr, Barbara Sawicka, Dominika Skiba, and Piotr Barbaś. 2025. "Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques" Sustainability 17, no. 3: 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030828
APA StylePszczółkowski, P., Sawicka, B., Skiba, D., & Barbaś, P. (2025). Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques. Sustainability, 17(3), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030828