Next Article in Journal
Impact of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantation Management on Biomass, Carbon Sequestration Rates and Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics of Built-Up Areas and Loss of Vegetation in Secondary Towns: Case Study of Sarh Town in Chad, Central Africa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City

1
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 10 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025

Abstract

:
Effective production, living, and ecological space allocation is essential for improving and optimizing urban space development. In this study, we proposed a production–living–ecological space (PLES) identification method based on Point of Interest (POI) data and China Land Cover Dataset (CLCD) to identify PLESs in Xuzhou City for the years 2012, 2018, and 2022, with an average recognition accuracy of 89.81%. Moreover, the land-use transfer matrix, center of gravity migration, and Geo-detector were used to reveal the spatiotemporal pattern evolution of PLESs. The results showed that: (1) The distribution of PLESs presented significant differentiation between Urban Built-Up Area (UBUA) and Non-Urban Built-Up Area (NUBUA). UBUA was mainly composed of living spaces, while NUBUA was primarily characterized by production–ecological spaces. (2) The intensive utilization of urban land led to an increase in the area of multifunctional spaces, while the complexity of urban space increased. (3) During 2012 to 2022, the center of gravity of PLESs remained relatively stable. The moving distances were all less than 1 km (except for ecological space from 2012 to 2018). (4) The evolution of PLESs was closely linked with socio-economic factors, and the interactions between the factors also had a significant driving effect on PLESs.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the rapid urbanization and economic development in China have significantly transformed land use and allocation patterns, leading to profound changes in the structure and functions of regional landscapes [1]. As a country with a large population and limited land resources, China faces pressing challenges in balancing urban expansion with territorial spatial pattern preservation [2]. Under this circumstance, optimizing the allocation and coordinated development of production, living, and ecological spaces has emerged as a crucial strategy for addressing resource and environmental challenges and achieving sustainable regional development [3]. The balanced development of the territorial spatial pattern and its function is an important prerequisite for the realization of regional high-quality development [4]. In 2012, the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed the objective of “building the production space that is intensive and efficient, the living space that is livable and appropriate, and an ecological space that is beautiful and unspoiled”, which introduced the concept of the development significance of production, living, and ecological spaces [5,6]. These three kinds of spaces are abbreviated as Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES), which serves as a vital indicator in land planning and development [7]. Production space supports economic activities such as agriculture, industry, and commerce [8,9]; living space accommodates human habitation and essential services [10]; and ecological space contributes to environmental regulation and resource conservation [11]. In recent years, studies on urban spaces have increasingly focused on balancing ecological protection with sustainable development. Yuan et al. [12] developed natural ecological networks to evaluate the ecological system characteristics, providing a scientific basis for balancing ecological protection with regional development in Changzhi City. Similarly, Bai et al. [13] demonstrated that the coordinated allocation of urban space and resources is essential for achieving sustainable urban agglomeration development from the contributions of infrastructure, industrial layout, public services, and environmental services. Their study further validated the importance of balanced urban spatial development by incorporating infrastructure, industrial layout, public services, and environmental services. Production, living, and ecological spaces are both independent and interdependent, and their relationships shape the functional patterns and development potential of a region [14]. However, under rapid urbanization, these spaces often face imbalances. For instance, large areas of agricultural land have been converted to urban construction land [15], and human activities have severely impacted the stability of urban ecosystems [16], resulting in the expansion of production and living spaces at the expense of ecological spaces, which weakens ecological functions and sustainability [17]. The interactions among production, living, and ecological spaces are often imbalanced, which could lead to ecological degradation and inefficient resource utilization. Therefore, monitoring and analyzing the spatiotemporal changes in these spaces is essential for providing scientific support for land management and urban planning, helping to alleviate the environmental pressures caused by land resource scarcity. Huang et al. [18] selected land-use data and constructed a regional spatial model to reveal the ecological environment quality and the effects of land-use transformation in the PLESs of Baishan City. Aruban and Liu [19] discussed the evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PLESs to offer a basis for the effective use and rational development of rural land in Duolun County. The identification and analysis of PLESs from diverse perspectives provide deeper insights into urban growth patterns, land-use optimization, and the sustainable development of urban areas. However, most studies [20,21] have focused on the identification and optimization of single-function spaces, often neglecting the synergy, interrelationships, and functional balance among different types of spaces. In reality, the various functional spaces involved in urban development are often interwoven and interdependent. Focusing solely on the optimization of a single space is insufficient to resolve the conflicts and trade-offs among different spaces effectively. Therefore, systematic and comprehensive identification of PLESs and analyzing their spatiotemporal pattern evolution are critical for achieving efficient land management and sustainable development.
The previous research on PLESs has focused on identification and classification [22,23], the spatiotemporal pattern evolution [24], evolution characteristics [25], driving force exploration [26,27], and spatial simulation and optimization [28]. Hu et al. [29] selected land-use/cover data and developed a classifying assessment index system for analyzing the spatial distribution of PLESs in Qinghai. From the perspective of PLESs, Liang et al. [30] explored the evolutionary trend of land-use change and landscape ecological risk in an ecologically fragile area the based on the land cover data. These studies also provided targeted policy recommendations to support regional sustainable development, ecological environment protection, and land and space optimization based on their identification and analysis of PLESs. Under these circumstances, effective PLES identification is a necessary condition for achieving a fair allocation of PLESs. For the identification and classification of PLESs, it mostly relies on land-use classification data, which offer limited representation of land functions and have difficulty fully reflecting the diversity and dynamic change characteristics of spatial functions in previous research. To address these limitations, multi-source geospatial data have been widely applied across various fields due to their high accuracy, comprehensiveness, multidimensionality, and timeliness. Yin et al. [31] analyzed the economy–society–environment sustainability in the Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration based on the multi-source geospatial data. Qin et al. also used the data to assess subsidence risk in urban areas [32]. The rapid development and widespread application of multi-source geospatial data have provided new technical support for the detailed study of PLESs [33]. The rise of geographic big data (such as Point of Interest (POI) data) provides new opportunities and perspectives for the realization of the simulation and inference of geographic systems and the exploration of the development rules and trends of complex urban space [34]. POI data not only offer precise information about urban functional layouts, but also reflect the intensity and distribution of human activities [35]. When integrated with remote sensing imagery, socioeconomic statistics, land cover data, and other sources, it becomes possible to identify and monitor PLESs across multiple scales dynamically [36]. Therefore, conducting refined identification and spatial pattern evolution analysis of PLESs based on multi-source data holds significant theoretical value and practical implications.
Different from the previous studies that identify and analyze PLESs in urban cities, this study focused on Xuzhou City and divided it into Urban Built-Up Area (UBUA) and Non-Urban Built-Up Area (NUBUA) using the Densi-graph method and POI data. In UBUA, a PLES identification method based on POI data and CLCD was proposed to identify PLESs in Xuzhou City for the years 2012, 2018, and 2022. This method achieved a more detailed and nuanced classification of PLESs and successfully captured its diverse functional characteristics. However, POI data are more densely distributed in UBUAs and sparsely distributed in NUBUAs [37]. Due to the sparse distribution of POI data in NUBUAs, the CLCD was applied to identify PLESs, which could improve the reliability and accuracy of the identification results. Furthermore, based on the PLES identification results, the spatiotemporal pattern evolution and driving mechanism of PLES distribution in Xuzhou City were discussed. The findings can provide a scientific reference for the optimization of regional spatial resource allocation in Xuzhou City.
Descriptions of the materials (including the study area and data sources) and methods used in this paper are provided in Section 2. The distributions of the PLESs classified by our method are described in Section 3. Moreover, the spatiotemporal pattern evolution of PLESs and the significance and limitations of this study are discussed in Section 4. Finally, the main conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Study Area

The city of Xuzhou (116°22′ E~118°40′ E, 33°43′ N~34°58′ N) is situated in northwestern Jiangsu Province, covering an area of 11,765 km2 (Figure 1). It consists of the central urban districts (Tongshan, Quanshan, Yunlong, and Gulou), Jiawang District, Feng County, Pei County, Suining County, Xinyi City, and Pizhou City. As one of the national old industrial bases and the first resource-depleted cities, Xuzhou has steadily advanced industrial, ecological, urban, and social transformations in revitalization. According to the China Resource-Based Old Industrial City Transformation Development Index Report (2022), Xuzhou City ranked first among the top 20 cities in China for its comprehensive transformation performance as a resource-based old industrial city. However, Xuzhou City is under the challenges of enhancing autonomous innovation, alleviating resource and environmental constraints. Consequently, it is very important to detect the evolution and interrelationships of the PLESs in Xuzhou City, which will help to scientifically make regional spatial planning and guide the coordinated development of regional environment, economy, and society.

2.2. Data

2.2.1. Data Sources

The primary data used in this study include POI data, CLCD, and Open Street Map (OSM) data. The POI data were obtained from the Automatic Navigation Map (AMAP) for Xuzhou City in 2012, 2018, and 2022. A total of 654,328 elements were obtained, with 82,289 collected in 2012, 317,119 in 2018, and 254,920 in 2022. Furthermore, a variety of socio-economic and natural geographic data were incorporated in this study. More details of these data are provided in Table 1.

2.2.2. Data Preprocessing

According to the AMAP classification system, the POI data were divided into three levels, including base type, subtype, and category. Each POI dataset includes 9 attributes: name, province, city, address, longitude, latitude, and the three-level categories. Due to the extensive number of categories and the inherent redundancy and overlap within the data, duplicate POIs were eliminated based on identical names and geographic proximity. The POI data, initially comprising nine attributes, were filtered to retain only six key attributes: name, longitude, latitude, and the three-level categories, while excluding the province, city, and address fields. POI elements with misclassified categories were relabeled based on their category attributes. Additionally, referencing the “Current land use classification (GB/T 21010-2017)” [38] and the “Code for classification of urban land use and planning standards of development land (GB 50137-2011)” [39], the POI data were reclassified based on the living, production, and ecological functions.
The POI data captured both the spatial location and attribute information of geographic entities. However, significant differences in area were observed among various types of entities, such as supermarkets, schools, gymnasiums, and zoos. To address this, relevance (P1) and influence (P2) were adopted [34], based on the classification of living, production, and ecological functions, to calculate a comprehensive weight (P). Relevance (P1) was determined for each POI element using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [40], while influence (P2) was assigned a score ranging from 0 to 100 based on the public perception of the area of geographic entities, with scoring criteria referenced from previous studies [41,42]. Finally, the comprehensive weight (P) for each POI element was obtained by multiplying relevance (P1) and influence (P2). The results of the reclassification and comprehensive weight calculations are presented in Table 2.

2.3. Methods

In this study, the methodology is primarily divided into four parts. Firstly, POI data were applied to extract the urban built-up area by the Densi-graph method. Xuzhou City was divided into Urban Built-Up Areas (UBUAs) and Non-Urban Built-Up Areas (NUBUAs). Secondly, the identification units were delineated by using the OpenStreetMap (OSM) data for UBUAs. Meanwhile, a PLES identification method that combined POI data and CLCD was proposed within UBUAs. In contrast, the classification and identification of PLESs in NUBUAs primarily relied on the CLCD, which provided comprehensive land cover information. Finally, the spatial distribution and temporal evolution of PLESs in Xuzhou City were discussed and analyzed. The detailed flowchart of the research process is shown in Figure 2.

2.3.1. Extraction of Urban Built-Up Area

POI data are closely related to human activities, and it reflects the spatial concentration of these activities. The POI data is densely distributed in UBUA. While at the boundaries of UBUA, the number of POIs significantly decreases. Based on this characteristic, the Densi-graph method proposed by Xu et al. [43], which have proven effective for extracting the boundaries of urban built-up areas.
The main idea of the Densi-graph method is as follows: First, the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) [44,45] was applied with a search radius set to 5 m to generate the kernel density map for POI data, which provides the contour lines of the POIs. And then, the kernel density values (d) and the theoretical radius ( S d ) of the area (Sd) enclosed by the corresponding closed curves are respectively used as the X and Y values to plot the Densi-graph curve. By analyzing the changes in the curve, the threshold at which the overall decline in POI density leads to an irreversible upward trend is identified. The POI density value corresponding to this threshold was taken as the critical value (r) for the urban built-up area boundary. The area enclosed by the contour line at this value (r) was defined as the urban built-up area. The main calculation formula of this method is shown in Formula (1):
D = l i m d ( S d ) d d
where d represents the density value, S d is the area enclosed by the corresponding closed curve, S d   is the theoretical radius of the area defined by the closed curve, and D is the derivative value of the theoretical radius increment. When D = 0, the density curve is uniform, when D > 0, the density curve is expanding, and when D < 0, the density curve is contracting.

2.3.2. Unit Division for PLES Identification in UBUAs

The identification units (hereinafter referred to as units) represent the smallest spatial divisions used to categorize different areas. Defining these units is a crucial step in identifying PLESs within UBUAs. In recent research, two primary methods are commonly used to define units: grid-based division [46,47,48] and road network-based division [49,50,51]. In reality, urban block forms are typically represented as irregular polygons, and grid-based division may lead to discrepancies between the shapes and sizes of the grid units and the actual functional zones. In contrast, road network-based division considers the actual layout of urban roads, resulting in units with irregular geometric shapes that more accurately reflect the true boundaries and structures of functional zones. Therefore, this study employed the road network-based division method to define the units.

2.3.3. PLES Identification in UBUAs

The Spatial Join tool in ArcMap 10.2 was used to spatially connected the POI data with the units in UBUAs. The attributes of production, living, and ecological functions were assigned to each corresponding unit. In addition, the number of POI datapoints that belong to each unit was counted. Based on the specific types and quantities of living, production, and ecological proportions within each unit, the proportions of different functions for each unit were calculated using Formulas (2)–(4):
N i = C i × P i   ,   i = 1 ,   2 ,   3 , , n
S = i n N i   , i = 1 ,   2 ,   3 , , n
R i = S i i n S i   ,   i = 1 ,   2 ,   3 , n
where N i represents the comprehensive count of the i-th type of POI within the unit, C i is the number of POI data points of the i-th type of POI data in the unit, P i indicates the comprehensive weight of the i-th type of POI data, S represents the combined value of living, production, and ecological functions in each unit, S i denotes the proportion value of the i-th type functions within the unit, and R i is the value of the proportion of the i-th type functional element in the unit.
Relying on the calculated proportion of POI data assigned to different PLES functions, the spatial type can be determined within each unit. First, the proportions of living, production, and ecological functions within each unit were calculated. Second, the spatial identification of the units was conducted based on a specified classification standard. It is noteworthy that null areas may appear in the identification results, requiring further supplementary identification using CLCD. The spatial types were identified and classified into 10 categories of PLES types in UBUAs. The specific spatial categories are listed in Table 3.
The process for identifying PLESs, as detailed in Figure 3, is presented in the following steps:
  • When a unit contains no POI data, it is classified as “No data”, and its final spatial type is determined by supplementary identification using the CLCD.
  • If POI data exist within the unit, the proportions of each function are calculated and ranked as primary, secondary, and tertiary proportions, represented by R i , R j , and R k , respectively.
    (1)
    When R i 70 % , the unit is determined as a single-function space (LS, PS, or ES) dominated by the function of R i .
    (2)
    When   50 % R i < 70 % , R j is compared to 30%, resulting in four possible identification scenarios:
  • If R j < 30 % and R k 20 % , the unit may be defined as MS.
  • If R j < 30 % , R k < 20 % and the relative difference between R j and R k is 10 % , the unit is possibly classified as SLS, SPS, or SES based on the function of R i . If the difference is less than 10%, the unit may be determined to be a single-function space (LS, PS, or ES) dominated by the function of R i .
  • If R j 30 % and R k 10 % , the unit is possibly classified as SLS, SPS, or SES according to the R i .
  • If R j 30 % , R k < 10 % , and the relative difference between R i and R j is 20 % , the unit is possibly classified as SLS, SPS, or SES based on the function of R i . If the difference is less than 20%, the unit is possibly defined as the LPS, LES, or PES depending on the functions of R i and R j .
    (3)
    When R i < 50 % , R j is compared to 30%, resulting in three possible identification scenarios:
  • If R j 30 % and R k 20 % , the unit is classified as MS.
  • If R j 30 % and R k < 20 % , the unit is likely classified as LPS, LES, or PES, depending on the functions of R i and R j .
  • If R j < 30 % , the unit is classified as MS.

2.3.4. PLES Identification in NUBUAs

In NUBUAs, the drastic decrease in the number of POIs compromises the accuracy and reliability of PLES identification results. To enhance the precision of these results and avoid errors caused by data sparsity, the CLCD was utilized for identifying PLESs within NUBUAs. Subsequently, a classification framework for NUBUAs was developed by reclassifying and reorganizing the CLCD from the perspective of PLESs. The classification criteria for this system are detailed in Table 4. The CLCD offered valuable insights into land cover types, which were essential for identifying and classifying areas that support ecological and productive functions.

3. Results

3.1. Extraction Results and Verification of UBUAs

3.1.1. Extraction Results

Based on the methods described in Section 2.3.1, the urban built-up areas of Xuzhou in 2012, 2018, and 2022 were extracted using POI data. The extraction results are presented in Figure 4, which clearly illustrates a discernible trend of urban built-up area expansion in Xuzhou City.

3.1.2. Verification of Extraction Results

After obtaining the built-up area extraction results, accuracy validation was necessary to verify their reliability and to determine whether the results can be used to divide Xuzhou City into UBUAs and NUBUAs for subsequent PLES identification. Firstly, the areas of built districts from the Xuzhou Statistical Yearbook were used as reference data. Secondly, the relative errors between the extracted area and the statistical data were calculated. The pertinent data presented in Table 5 showed that the relative errors between the extracted area and the statistical area were consistently below 10%, indicating that the extraction results were reliable.

3.2. Identification Results and Verification of PLESs in Xuzhou City

3.2.1. Identification Results

After UBUAs were extracted, Xuzhou City was divided into UBUAs and NUBUAs for the identification of PLESs. By applying the methods described in Section 2.3.3 and Section 2.3.4, the PLESs were identified for the years 2012, 2018, and 2022. The results are shown in Figure 5. From 2012 to 2022, the PLESs in Xuzhou City changed significantly. It is obvious that the living–production space in NUBUA was expanding, especially around the boundary of UBUAs. This phenomenon revealed the gradual urbanization of the spatial layout in NUBUAs with the advancement of the transformation of industries and urbanization processes in Xuzhou City.

3.2.2. Verification of Identification Results of PLESs in UBUAs

The objective is to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the proposed method for identifying PLESs in UBUAs. Based on the identification results, 50% of the units for each year were randomly selected as validation units and were compared with the PLES classifications derived from visual interpretation of remote sensing imagery in UBUAs using a confusion matrix [52]. In 2012, the identification result achieved an accuracy of 91.58%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.88. For 2018, the accuracy was slightly lower at 88.42%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.84. In 2022, the accuracy improved to 89.42%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.86. Overall, the average accuracy across the three years was 89.81%, with kappa coefficients consistently above 0.86. The accuracy validation results confirmed the reliability and effectiveness of our method for identifying PLESs in UBUAs over time. The validation results in 2022 are shown in Table 6.
According to the validation results in Table 6, we further analyzed the misclassified units and found that 138 units out of the 1304 selected units exhibited discrepancies between the types identified using POI data and the types visually interpreted from remote sensing imagery. Among these misclassified units, 28 units (counted 20.29% for our validation units) were located near the boundaries of built-up areas, where the sparse distribution of POIs led to inaccuracies in the identification results of PLESs. The remaining 110 misclassified units were primarily concentrated in areas with no data. When supplemented with CLCD for identification, these units were often classified as similar functional spaces. Similarly, these phenomena were also present in the identification results of PLESs in 2012 and 2018. However, the validation results indicate an average accuracy of 89.81% and an average kappa coefficient of 0.86. Conclusively, the PLES identification results were reliable enough to provide effective support for the identification of PLESs in UBUAs.

3.3. Identification Results in UBUAs

In this section, the detailed presentation of the identification results of the PLESs in UBUAs (Figure 6) are provided to enhance comprehension of the distributions and interactions of the PLESs. The area of each type of PLES is calculated and summarized in Table 6. From the figure, it could be observed that the distribution of PLESs in UBUAs presented diversified characteristics. The living spaces, sub-living spaces, and living–production spaces represented the main components of the PLESs in Xuzhou City. Living and sub-living spaces primarily supported the daily activities of urban residents, serving as an essential foundation for residential and service functions. Living–production spaces combined residential and production functions to fulfill the accommodation requirements of the population. Meanwhile, they also provided support for economic activities. These spaces constitute the primary spatial distribution within UBUAs, which reflected the coordination and diversity in the utilization of space in Xuzhou City.
According to the Table 7, the area of living space and production space dominated by a single function showed a decreasing tendency in UBUAs over the past decades. In contrast, the area of multifunctional space and mixed-function space increased significantly. Notably, the growth in living–production spaces and mixed spaces were particularly remarkable, with increases of 63.52 km2 and 11.39 km2. Through the active promotion of emerging industries, an increase in the proportion of production functions was achieved in Xuzhou City. It marked a phased success in its industrial transformation.

3.4. Identification Results in NUBUAs

The results for identification of PLESs in NUBUAs are presented in Table 8.
(1)
The scale of ecological space decreased, and the protection of ecological land was under pressure.
The area of ecological space decreased significantly from 2012 to 2022, especially in districts with rapid urban expansion, such as the central urban districts and Xinyi City. The ecological space in the central urban districts decreased from 102.41 km2 in 2012 to 66.74 km2 in 2022, indicating a reduction rate of 34.8%. Similarly, Xinyi City experienced a reduction of 3.2%. The ecological space was increasingly compressed by urban development and production demands, which reflected weakened ecological protection in areas with rapid development pressures. Nevertheless, Pei County and Feng County maintained relatively stable ecological space proportions, suggesting that localized conservation measures may have been effective.
(2)
The scale of production–ecological space decreased due to urban expansion and land-use transformation.
From 2012 to 2022, the production–ecological space in Suining County decreased by 569.8 km2, which accounted for an annual average reduction of 56.98 km2, while Pizhou City decreased by 469.2 km2, with an annual reduction of 46.92 km2. Feng County, Xinyi City, and Pei County also showed decreases of 375.2 km2, 409.8 km2, and 316.9 km2 over the same period, respectively. The most notable annual reduction rate occurred in Suining County, where its production–ecological space decreased by approximately 4.05% over the decade. The consistency of total scale change in production–living space and change in its internal structure showed that Xuzhou City, part of the agricultural land in Xuzhou City, was converted into construction land, which has led to the weakening of regional agricultural production and ecological functions, and has increased the pressure on land resource allocation.
(3)
The scale of living–production space increased significantly due to urbanization and rural development.
The living–production space in all districts of Xuzhou presented an expansion trend. In the central urban districts, the living–production space reached 637.51 km2 over the decade, marking an increase of 56.09 km2 from 2012, with a growth rate of 9.65%. In Pizhou City, the living–production space increased by 425.83 km2, representing a growth rate of 13.02%. Feng County and Xinyi City also increased by 35.4 km2 and 40.43 km2, representing increases of 13.2% and 15.01%, respectively. The expansion of the total area of living space revealed that rapid development and urbanization occurred in Xuzhou. It also reflected the increasing emphasis on improving residential and production conditions in NUBUAs.

4. Discussion

The spatial evolution of PLESs in Xuzhou City has been influenced by various factors, including urbanization, economic restructuring, and environmental changes. It is crucial to investigate how PLES shave changed over time and to identify the key driving forces behind these transformations in order to support the development of effective urban planning strategies. In particular, investigating the migration of the center of gravity and the driving factors affecting spatial transitions can provide valuable insights into the complex relationship between urban sprawl and land use. This study has discussed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of PLESs in Xuzhou and examined the driving factors behind these changes by focusing on quantitative spatial transitions, analyzing migration in the centers of gravity, and investigating driving factors. These findings are expected to provide insights that contribute to the optimization of land-use strategies and the promotion of balanced urban–rural integration, which are essential for sustainable regional development.

4.1. Quantitative Description of Spatial Transitions in PLESs

The land-use transfer matrix [53,54,55] is primarily used to evaluate the rates and directions of transitions between various land-use categories, while also uncovering the interconnections and dynamic trends among these categories [56]. Similarly, the principle of the land-use transfer matrix is applicable to exploring the internal correlations and change trends in PLESs, which can provide a quantitative description of the transfer of various spatial types. The land-use transfer matrix formula is shown in Formula (5).
S i j = S 11 S 12 S 1 n S 21 S 22 S 2 n S n 1 S n 2 S n n
where S represents the area transferred by the type of PLES; n represents the number of PLES classifications in the study area; i and j indicate the types of PLES before and after the transfer, respectively; and Sij represents the area of PLES converted from Class i to Class j.
Based on the land-use transfer matrix, the changes in various types of PLESs within Xuzhou were determined. Table 9 illustrates the specific patterns of spatial transitions among various PLES types within UBUAs. Meanwhile, the corresponding transitions in NUBUAs are presented in Table 10.
From 2012 to 2022, the spatial transitions of PLESs in UBUAs showed variable tendencies. Based on the transition matrix in Table 9, living spaces expanded significantly over the period. From 2012 to 2018, approximately 27.61 km2 of living spaces were converted into multifunctional spaces such as living–production space, which reflected the growing urban demand for integrated spaces. This trend continued from 2018 to 2022, though at a reduced intensity, indicating a slowing yet persistent shift of living spaces into multifunctional spaces. Based on the findings from these two periods, the conversion of PLES types in UBUAs of Xuzhou City primarily occurred among living space, sub-living space, and living–production space. This phenomenon was largely driven by differences in the proportion of production functions within the identified units, which resulted in similar spatial transformations.
As the most significant area changes, the living space primarily transitioned from production–ecological and ecological spaces. On the basis of requirements on urbanization and industrialization processes in Xuzhou City, the area of living–production space expanded substantially, increasing from 2547.46 km2 in 2012 to 3827.48 km2 in 2022. From 2012 to 2018, production–ecological space accounted for the largest transfer-out area at 1992.79 km2, with 84.51% (1684.07 km2) transitioning into living–production space. In comparison, ecological space had the smallest transfer-out area, totaling just 56.28 km2. From 2018 to 2022, the transfer-out area of production–ecological space declined significantly to 631.03 km2, while living–production space absorbed the majority of this transfer, including 501.63 km2 from production–ecological space and 27.99 km2 from ecological space.

4.2. Center of Gravity Migration of PLESs in NUBUAs

The center of gravity migration model in PLESs is the regional weighted average center, which could effectively illustrate the overall patterns of spatial changes in regional land use. Many scholars have used the center of gravity migration models to calculate changes in vegetation [57], land use [58], soil erosion [59], and other factors, providing insights into spatial patterns and change dynamics across various domains. The mathematical expressions of the center of gravity migration model are presented in Formulas (6) and (7).
X ¯ = i = 1 n M i X i i = 1 n M i
Y ¯ = i = 1 n M i Y i i = 1 n M i
where X ¯ is the latitude of the center of gravity of one type of PLES cover; Y ¯ is the longitude of the center of gravity of one type of PLES cover; X i is the latitude of the i-th data unit; Y i is the longitude of the i-th data unit; and M i represents the area of the PLES resource in the i-th data unit.
Figure 7 illustrates that during the study period, the centers of gravity of living–production space and production–ecological space were concentrated in the Jiawang District. Meanwhile, the ecological space was focused in the Tongshan District. Specifically, the center of gravity of living–production space migrated to the northwest from 2012 to 2018, and the migration distance was approximately 640.63 m; from 2018 to 2022, it migrated to the northeast with a migration distance of approximately 145.18 m. The production–ecological space mainly migrated to the east, and the migration distances in the two periods from 2012 to 2018 and 2018 to 2022 were approximately 184.89 m and 53.98 m, respectively. The ecological space migrated approximately 1702.23 m to the southwest during 2012–2018, and approximately 391.27 m to the southwest from 2018 to 2022.

4.3. Driving Forces of the Spatiotemporal Evolution in PLESs

4.3.1. Selection of Driving Factors

Based on prior research findings [58,60], eight factors were selected to explore the driving forces behind the trade-offs and synergies in the spatial distribution of PLESs. These factors, categorized into topography, socio-economic conditions, and natural climate, are illustrated in Figure 8. The topographic factors include Digital Elevation Model (DEM, X1), slope (X2), and aspect (X3). The DEM is a representation of the terrain’s elevation, which directly influences water drainage, soil erosion, and vegetation distribution [61]. Slope and aspect significantly affect land suitability for various activities. Steep slopes and unfavorable aspects often limit agricultural development and urban expansion [62]. Social and economic factors, including GDP (X4) and population (X5), reflect the influence of human activities. GDP serves as an indicator of regional economic development, correlating with urbanization intensity, infrastructure growth, and industrial activities [63]. Similarly, population serves as a fundamental determinant of spatial demand [64]. The natural climate factors, including precipitation (X6), temperature (X7), and NPP (X8), are essential environmental indicators that influence regional land-use patterns, resource allocation, and the spatial distribution of economic activities. Precipitation impacts the availability of water resources, which are vital for agricultural production, ecosystem health, and urban water supply [65,66]. Temperature influences ecosystem growth [67] and agricultural productivity, while also influencing human living conditions [68]. In urban areas, elevated temperatures can exacerbate the urban heat island effect, further affecting the demand for urban spaces [69]. NPP represents fundamental natural ecosystem functions, and serves as a crucial indicator for evaluating ecosystem responses, offering an effective measure of the ecological impacts of urbanization [70]. To quantify these driving factors, the natural breaks (Jenks) method, provided by the Reclassify tool of ArcMap 10.2, was employed to individually discretize each factor into nine levels, with values assigned on a scale from 1 to 9.

4.3.2. Driving Force Exploration with Geo-Detector

Geo-detector is a tool proposed by Wang et al. for detecting spatially stratified heterogeneity in 2016 [71]. It consists of four components: factor detection, ecological detection, interaction detection, and risk detection. Geo-detector [72,73] is utilized to analyze spatial disparities in geographic phenomena and to reveal the fundamental factors driving these variations, and it is widely utilized in the field of ecological research. In this study, the discretized values of each driving factor were used as independent variables, and the PLES utilization index calculated by the calculation formula of the land-use intensity served as the dependent variable. These values were provided as input data in a version of Excel Geo-detector, with further details available at http://geodetector.cn/. Finally, the results of factor detection and interaction detection were primarily selected to investigate the driving forces of PLESs. The calculation formulas of Geo-detector are presented in Formula (8).
q = 1 S S W S S T = 1 h = 1 L N h σ h 2 N σ 2
where q [0–1] value presents the contributions of the driving factors to PLESs. A higher q corresponds to the greater influence of the driving factor X. L represents the number of categories for the selected driving factor. N h and N represent the unit numbers of stratum h and the whole region of interest, respectively. σ h 2 and σ 2 represent the variance of PLESs for stratum h and the whole area, respectively.
Based on the results of the factor detector, the average q values of various factors, which were calculated from the q values of 2012, 2018, and 2022, are shown in Figure 9. The primary driving forces behind the evolution of PLES types in Xuzhou were socio-economic factors, with population and GDP showing mean q-values of 0.601 and 0.492, respectively. Belonging to the natural climate factors, the annual average precipitation, temperature, and NPP demonstrated a balanced influence on the spatial distribution of PLESs in Xuzhou City. In contrast, the influence of topographic factors was relatively weak. Among the topographic factors, the effect of the DEM was 0.111, while the slope and aspect decreased by 0.013 and 0.001, respectively. The influence of different factors showed significant differentiation in the evolution of PLESs. Exploring the reasons for this phenomenon, it is obvious that rapid economic and social development affected the spatial distribution of urban functional spaces. On the other hand, approximately 90% of Xuzhou City’s area is covered by flat plains. Therefore, the influence of topographic factors on PLES changes was relatively weak compared to socio-economic and natural climate factors.
The interaction detection results (Figure 10) indicated that the distribution and changes of PLESs in Xuzhou City were also influenced by multiple factors together. Nonlinear enhancements and two-factor enhancement effects were observed for each factor in the spatiotemporal evolution of PLESs. Specifically, the two-factor enhancement effect in 2012 was weaker compared to that in 2018 and 2022, with the maximum interaction effect observed at 0.7 (between population and temperature). In contrast, the maximum interaction effects in 2018 and 2022 increased to 0.96 and 0.97, respectively, driven by the interaction between GDP and population. In the development of the PLES pattern, the driving forces of socio-economic and natural climate factors has become increasingly significant.

4.4. Limitation and Prospective

One of the main aspects of our study is the identification of PLESs in Xuzhou City based on combining the POI data and CLCD. POI data that provide abundant information for urban functional zoning and spatial structure analysis are widely available across the country. Meanwhile, the CLCD offers broad coverage and updates regularly, which could provide accurate representations of land-use types across various regions. With the advancement of geographic information sharing and open data policies in China, the availability of these datasets is steadily increasing. Therefore, the method for identifying PLESs based on POI data and CLCD is applicable to most comparable regions. However, due to the heavy reliance on the availability and accuracy of data sources, which could potentially affect the comprehensiveness of the results in areas with limited or inconsistent data coverage, the classification accuracy of our method is influenced by the resolution and reliability of the POI and CLCD data. Under the circumstances, integrating additional high-precision datasets (such as satellite imagery or remote sensing data) to improve classification accuracy is a meaningful research direction.
Furthermore, the detailed analysis of the accuracy validation results for our proposed method in UBUAs revealed instances of misclassification near the boundaries of built-up areas, primarily due to sparse POI distribution causing inaccuracies in PLES identification, as well as misclassifications in areas with no data, where units were frequently identified as similar functional spaces. In the future, incorporating additional data for the correction and verification of misclassifications to enhance the reliability of our study will remain a critical challenge that needs to be resolved.
In addition, the comprehensiveness of selected driving factors determines the accuracy of driving force analysis. The selection of driving factors in this study focused on topography, natural climate, and socio-economic aspects, while neglecting institutional factors such as government policies. These elements often play a crucial role in shaping land-use patterns and spatial configurations. The scope of driving factors should be broadened by incorporating policy orientations, planning strategies, and other institutional influences. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving PLES distribution and evolution, and offer stronger support for evidence-based spatial planning and governance.

5. Conclusions

With the rapid advancement of industrialization and urbanization, the rational distribution and development of urban spaces have been profoundly impacted and shocked. Exploring the distribution patterns and interconnections of PLESs is highly significant for spatial planning and zoning management. In this paper, considering the spatial characteristics of our study area, Xuzhou City was separated into UBUAs and NUBUAs using the Densi-graph method and POI data. Within UBUAs, a PLES identification method based on POI data and CLCD was proposed to identify PLESs in Xuzhou City for the years 2012, 2018, and 2022, with an average recognition accuracy of 89.81%. It proves the feasibility and potential of combining POI data and CLCD in PLES spatial identification, which also provides a theoretical and methodological basis for the exploration of urban spatial planning. However, due to the sparse distribution of POI data in NUBUAs, the CLCD was applied to identify PLESs, which improved the reliability and accuracy of the identification results. Particularly, based on the PLES identification results, the spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanism of PLES distribution in Xuzhou City were further discussed. The following conclusions were drawn from this study:
(1)
Based on the PLES classification results, UBUAs were mainly composed of living spaces, while NUBUAs were primarily characterized by production–ecological spaces. Additionally, the area of multifunctional space increased from 10,876.98 km2 in 2012 to 10,898.55 km2 in 2018, and further expanded to 10,941.15 km2 by 2022. This continuous growth in multifunctional space indicates the increasingly integrated relationship be-tween living, production, and ecological activities, as well as the growing interaction of spatial functions within Xuzhou City.
(2)
According to the results of the spatial transfer matrix in PLESs, the most significant scale of conversion in UBUAs was the transformation of living space into living–production space. In NUBUAs, the area of ecological space transferred shows a significant increase, growing from 56.28 km2 to 105.18 km2. However, compared to the areas transferred out from living–production and production–ecological spaces, the transfer-out area of ecological space remains the smallest. The effective ecological restoration and protection efforts of Xuzhou City have reduced the loss of ecological space and have contributed to enhancing environmental sustainability.
(3)
The centers of gravity for living–production space and production–ecological space in the years 2012, 2018, and 2022 consistently remained within Jiawang District, while the centers of gravity for ecological space were located in Tongshan District. From 2012 to 2018, the moving distances for living–production space, production–ecological space, and ecological space were 640.63 m, 184.89 m, and 1702.23 m, respectively. However, the moving distances were reduced to 145.18 m, 53.98 m, and 391.27 m from 2018 to 2022, respectively. During 2012 to 2022, the center of gravity of PLESs remained relatively stable.
(4)
Driving force analysis revealed that socio-economic and natural climate factors were the main drivers of the evolution of PLESs. The primary social factors influencing the spatial variations of PLESs were GDP and population; the primary natural factor influencing the geographical variations of PLESs is precipitation. The interaction between GDP and population had the greatest effect on the spatial changes of PLESs.
In conclusion, this study presents a detailed, scientific, and practical method for identifying PLESs, contributing valuable insights for the sustainable development of urban spatial planning. The spatiotemporal evolution patterns and driving forces of PLESs were analyzed, providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing PLES distribution. This understanding is crucial for guiding urban planning and land-use strategies in rapidly growing cities. By identifying the trade-offs and synergies among different spatial functions, this study offers key insights to optimize land allocation, ensuring a balanced and sustainable approach to development and ecological conservation. Additionally, the findings provide a theoretical foundation and important guidance for managing the spatial balance of Xuzhou City, while also offering a scientific framework for managing geospatial resources in comparable regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.W. and Y.Z.; methodology, W.W. and Y.Z.; software, W.W. and S.D.; validation, W.W. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, W.W., S.D., Y.Z. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, W.W., Y.Z., C.M. and S.D.; supervision, Y.Z. funding acquisition, Y.Z. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Science (2021126).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this study.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all reviewers who provided constructive comments on this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, S.; Song, Z.; Cui, X.; Afriyie, D. Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Prediction of the Coordination Level of “Production-Living-Ecological” Function Coupling in the Yellow River Basin, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cao, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, X.; Cao, B. Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics, Development Patterns, and Ecological Effects of “Production-Living-Ecological Space” at the City Level in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Mi, X.; Wu, X.; Cheng, Z. Spatiotemporal Evolution Patterns of “Production-Living-Ecological” Spaces and the Coordination Level and Optimization of the Functions in Jilin Province. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yanbo, Q.; Shilei, W.; Yaya, T.; Guanghui, J.; Tao, Z.; Liang, M. Territorial Spatial Planning for Regional High-Quality Development—An Analytical Framework for the Identification, Mediation and Transmission of Potential Land Utilization Conflicts in the Yellow River Delta. Land Use Policy 2023, 125, 106462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Geng-ying, J.; Xiao-zhong, Y.; Zhi-qiang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Lin, L.U. Evolution Characteristics and Possible Impact Factors for the Changing Pattern and Function of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space in Wuyuan County. J. Nat. Resour. 2021, 36, 1252–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xia, N.; Hai, W.; Tang, M.; Song, J.; Quan, W.; Zhang, B.; Ma, Y. Spatiotemporal Evolution Law and Driving Mechanism of Production–Living–Ecological Space from 2000 to 2020 in Xinjiang, China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 154, 110807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Li, Y.; Yao, R.; Wu, R.; Li, W. Research on the Evolution and the Driving Forces of Land Use Classification for Production, Living, and Ecological Space in China’s Qilian Mountains Nature Reserve from 2000 to 2020. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 64949–64970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alkishe, A.; Cobos, M.E.; Peterson, A.; Samy, A. Recognizing Sources of Uncertainty in Disease Vector Ecological Niche Models: An Example with the Tick Rhipicephalus Sanguineus Sensu Lato. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 18, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Johnson, E.E.; Escobar, L.E.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C. An Ecological Framework for Modeling the Geography of Disease Transmission. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019, 34, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, F.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, H. Effects of Production–Living–Ecological Space Changes on the Ecosystem Service Value of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, B.; Han, Y. Policy Effects and Mechanisms of Ecological Civilization Demonstration Area on Carbon Efficiency in Resource-Based Cities. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 155, 111055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, P.; Cui, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.; Miao, D. Study on the Spatial Variation of China’s Territorial Ecological Space Based on the Standard Deviation Ellipse. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 982734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, L.; Zhou, X.; Tian, Y.; Wei, L. Evaluation for the Development of Urban Agglomeration Integration: A Case Study of Pearl River Delta. Soc. Indic. Res. 2024, 171, 877–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, Z.; Peng, S.; Ma, X.; Lin, Z.; Ma, D.; Shi, S.; Gong, L.; Huang, B. Identification of Potential Conflicts in the Production-Living-Ecological Spaces of the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration from a Multi-Scale Perspective. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 165, 112206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, Y.; Bao, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z. Land Use Transition and Its Eco-Environmental Effects in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective. Land 2020, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, J.; Mo, Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, K.; Ji, Q.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.-G.; Jin, G.; Li, L. Distribution, Transfer Process and Influence Factors of Phosphorus at Sediment-Water Interface in the Huaihe River. J. Hydrol. 2022, 612, 128079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, T.; Wang, N.; Luo, X.; Xu, J. Landscape Ecological Risks Assessment of the China-Vietnam Border Area: The Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Spaces. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2024, 24, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qi, J.; Liu, P. Study on the Ecological Environment Quality and Its Driving Factors of the Spatial Transformation of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Baishan City. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 18709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Aruhan; Liu, D. Study on the Influencing Factors of the Evolution of Space Pattern Based on Principal Component Analysis in Duolun County. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Lai, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Lv, L.; Fan, Y. Optimization of Territorial Ecological Space under the Constraint of Ecosystem Service Externalities. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 168, 112752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Chen, X.; Rong, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, B.; Bai, L.; Chen, Q.; Su, Y.; et al. Spatial Identification and Interactive Analysis of Urban Production—Living—Ecological Spaces Using Point of Interest Data and a Two-Level Scoring Evaluation Model. Land 2022, 11, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, X.; Li, X.; Fan, H.; He, W. Spatial Analysis of Production-Living-Ecological Functions and Zoning Method under Symbiosis Theory of Henan, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 69093–69110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yuan, W.; Bai, L.; Gao, X.; Zhou, K.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Qiu, Z.; Kou, Y.; Lv, Z.; Zhao, D.; et al. The Ecological Risks in Arid Zones from a Production–Living–Ecological Space Perspective: A Case Study of the Tuha Region in Xinjiang, China. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, D.; Fu, J.; Xie, X.; Ding, F.; Jiang, D. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban-Agricultural-Ecological Space in China and Its Driving Mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 371, 133684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Sun, H.; Xu, C. Function Evaluation and Coordination Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the Perspective of Type–Intensity–Connection: A Case Study of Suzhou, China. Land 2022, 11, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y. Synergy/Trade-Offs and Differential Optimization of Production, Living, and Ecological Functions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 147, 109925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, X.; Ruan, Y.; Xuan, W.; Bao, H.; Du, Z. Risk Assessment and Spatial Regulation on Urban Ground Collapse Based on Geo-Detector: A Case Study of Hangzhou Urban Area. Nat. Hazards 2023, 118, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liao, G.; He, P.; Gao, X.; Lin, Z.; Huang, C.; Zhou, W.; Deng, O.; Xu, C.; Deng, L. Land Use Optimization of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Space at Different Scales Based on the BP–ANN and CLUE–S Models. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Yuan, X.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, F. Spatial–Temporal Evolution of Production–Living–Ecological Space and Layout Optimization Strategy in Eco-Sensitive Areas: A Case Study of Typical Area on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 79807–79820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, T.; Yang, F.; Huang, D.; Luo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wen, C. Land-Use Transformation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective. Land 2022, 11, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, H.; Xiao, R.; Fei, X.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, Z.; Wan, Y.; Tan, W.; Jiang, X.; Cao, W.; Guo, Y. Analyzing “Economy-Society-Environment” Sustainability from the Perspective of Urban Spatial Structure: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 96, 104691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qin, Y.; Cao, L.; Li, S.; Ye, F.; Boloorani, A.D.; Liang, Z.; Huang, J.; Liu, G. Multisource Geoscience Data-Driven Framework for Subsidence Risk Assessment in Urban Area. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 113, 104901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, F.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, S. Ecological Security Assessment of Yunnan Province, China in the Context of Production–Living–Ecological Space Division. Ecol. Evol. 2024, 14, e70131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fu, C.; Tu, X.; Huang, A. Identification and Characterization of Production–Living–Ecological Space in a Central Urban Area Based on POI Data: A Case Study for Wuhan, China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Niu, H.; Silva, E.A. Delineating Urban Functional Use from Points of Interest Data with Neural Network Embedding: A Case Study in Greater London. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2021, 88, 101651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, J.; Bu, Z.; Jiang, D.; Lin, G. Identification and Classification of Urban PLES Spatial Functions Based on Multisource Data and Machine Learning. Land 2022, 11, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, S.; Shen, J.; Konečný, M.; Wang, Y.; Štampach, R. Study on the Spatial Heterogeneity of the POI Quality in OpenStreetMap. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cartography and GIS, Sozopol, Bulgaria, 18–23 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  38. GB/T 21010-2017; Current Land Use Classification. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2017.
  39. GB 50137-2011; Code for Classification of Urban Land Use and Planning Standards of Development Land. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2011.
  40. Reis, I.F.C.; Ferreira, F.A.F.; Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I.; Govindan, K.; Fang, W.; Falcão, P.F. An Evaluation Thermometer for Assessing City Sustainability and Livability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 47, 101449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ai, B.; Lai, Z.; Ma, S. Mapping the Functional Structure of Urban Agglomerations at the Block Level: A New Spatial Classification That Goes beyond Land Use. Land 2024, 13, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Sha, J.; Zhang, H.; Shifaw, E.; Guo, X.; Lai, S.; Wang, J. Trade-Offs and Synergies for Urban Production-Living-Ecological Spatial Patterns-Comparison Study between Fuzhou, China, and Saskatoon, Canada. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 169, 112816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, Z.; Gao, X. A Novel Method for Identifying the Boundary of Urban Built-up Areas with POI Data. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2016, 71, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Y.-C. A Tutorial on Kernel Density Estimation and Recent Advances. Biostat. Epidemiol. 2017, 1, 161–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gramacki, A. Kernel Density Estimation. In Nonparametric Kernel Density Estimation and Its Computational Aspects; Gramacki, A., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 25–62. ISBN 978-3-319-71688-6. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, C.; Wu, J. Land Use Transformation and Eco-Environmental Effects Based on Production-Living-Ecological Spatial Synergy: Evidence from Shaanxi Province, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 41492–41504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhao, B.; Tan, X.; Luo, L.; Deng, M.; Yang, X. Identifying the Production–Living–Ecological Functional Structure of Haikou City by Integrating Empirical Knowledge with Multi-Source Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deng, Y.; Yang, R. Influence Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space Changes in the Urbanization Process of Guangdong Province, China. Land 2021, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, W.; He, J.; Wang, X. Quantitatively Comparing the Morphological Influences on the Cool Island Effect in Urban Waterfront Blue-Green Spaces across Six Cities near 30° N. Urban. Clim. 2024, 56, 102076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, R.; Xiao, X.; Xia, J. (Cecilia) Contribution of Urban Functional Zones to the Spatial Distribution of Urban Thermal Environment. Build. Environ. 2022, 216, 109000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, B.; Deng, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, J.; Liu, T. Classification Schemes and Identification Methods for Urban Functional Zone: A Review of Recent Papers. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carlson, K.; Buttenfield, B.P.; Qiang, Y. Wetland Classification, Attribute Accuracy, and Scale. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2024, 13, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Z.; Ye, H.; Zhang, L. Understanding the Characteristics and Mechanism of Land Use Transition in Mountainous Economic Zone: A Case Study of the Chengdu-Chongqing Region in Southwestern China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 963197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; Hao, S.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, H. Study on the Response of Ecological Sensitivity to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Jinzhai, China. Geocarto Int. 2024, 39, 2390491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liang, Y.; Chai, D.; Zhou, X.; Ning, Y. Potential Conflict Diagnosis, Simulation Optimization and Coordination of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Gully Areas of the Loess Plateau, China. Environ. Dev. 2024, 52, 101099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, Z.; Dong, B.; Gao, X.; Wang, P.; Ren, C.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Lei, F.; Wei, Z.; Lu, Z.; et al. Land-Use Change and Driving Force Analysis of Wetland in Poyang Lake Based on Remote Sensing. J. Indian. Soc. Remote Sens. 2023, 51, 2077–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, X.; Zulkar, H.; Wang, D.; Zhao, T.; Xu, W. Changes in Vegetation Coverage and Migration Characteristics of Center of Gravity in the Arid Desert Region of Northwest China in 30 Recent Years. Land 2022, 11, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, X.; Ji, G.; Wang, F.; Ji, X.; Hou, C. Analysis of the Environmental Benefits and Driving Forces of the Development of the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Pattern Based on the ERI-ESV Geodetector. Land 2024, 13, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, S.; Qin, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Han, Y. The Evolutionary Path of the Center of Gravity for Water Use, the Population, and the Economy, and Their Decomposed Contributions in China from 1965 to 2019. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tang, X.; Cai, L.; Du, P. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Arid Ecological Transition Zone Based on Functional and Structural Perspectives: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, Z.; Rossel, R.A.V.; Liang, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhou, L.; Yu, W. Interactive Effects of Elevation and Land Use on Soil Bacterial Communities in the Tibetan Plateau. Pedosphere 2020, 30, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, J.; El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Guan, W. The Effect of Slope Aspect on Vegetation Attributes in a Mountainous Dry Valley, Southwest China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Niu, S.; Miao, M. Urban Economic Resilience within the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration: Exploring Spatially Correlated Network and Spatial Heterogeneity. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 103, 105270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Z.; Luan, W.; Zhang, Z.; Su, M. Relationship between Urban Construction Land Expansion and Population/Economic Growth in Liaoning Province, China. Land. Use Policy 2020, 99, 105022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xiong, M.-M.; Han, Z.-Y.; Lu, B.; Guo, J.; Xu, S.; Yang, Y.-J.; Huang, H. Effects of Rainfall on the Weekday Traffic Flow in Major Cities of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China, in 2021. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 2022, 13, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shang, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Cui, T.; Pan, C. Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Precipitation and Urbanization Effects in Shenzhen from 1960 to 2019. J. Water Clim. Chang. 2024, 15, 4114–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Qin, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Jin, G.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Q.; Zhan, Y. The Hydrological Regime of Taihu Lake under the Influence of Anthropogenic Activities. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2023, 50, 101568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mo, G.; Yan, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Zheng, S.; Cui, Y. Spatiotemporal Changes of Urban Heat Island Effect Relative to Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Jinan City, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 51902–51920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, G.; He, K.; Lyu, X.; Zang, Y.; Shu, H.; Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Wang, C. High-Precision Intracity Temperature Estimation Based on Generated Point Clouds. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024, 62, 5705615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, X. Dynamic Changes of Net Primary Productivity and Associated Urban Growth Driving Forces in Guangzhou City, China. Environ. Manag. 2020, 65, 758–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wang, J.-F.; Zhang, T.-L.; Fu, B.-J. A Measure of Spatial Stratified Heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 67, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Feng, C.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, L.; Guo, Y. Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective. Land 2022, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, X.; Ding, J.; Lu, B.; Wan, Y.; Shi, L.; Wen, Q. Eco-Environmental Effects of Changes in Territorial Spatial Pattern and Their Driving Forces in Qinghai, China (1980–2020). Land 2022, 11, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of the study area.
Figure 1. Overview of the study area.
Sustainability 17 00886 g001
Figure 2. Methodological framework of this study.
Figure 2. Methodological framework of this study.
Sustainability 17 00886 g002
Figure 3. Flowchart for the identification of PLESs in UBUAs.
Figure 3. Flowchart for the identification of PLESs in UBUAs.
Sustainability 17 00886 g003
Figure 4. Extraction results of UBUAs in Xuzhou City.
Figure 4. Extraction results of UBUAs in Xuzhou City.
Sustainability 17 00886 g004
Figure 5. Identification results of PLESs in Xuzhou City. (ac) The identification results of PLESs for 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively; (d) Legend of the corresponding figures.
Figure 5. Identification results of PLESs in Xuzhou City. (ac) The identification results of PLESs for 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively; (d) Legend of the corresponding figures.
Sustainability 17 00886 g005
Figure 6. Identification results of PLESs in UBUAs. (ac) The identification of PLESs in UBUAs of the central urban districts in 2012, 2018, and 2022; (d) the legend of these figures; (ej) the identification of PLESs in UBUAs of Jiawang District, Xinyi City, Pizhou City, Pei County, Feng County, and Suining County in 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively.
Figure 6. Identification results of PLESs in UBUAs. (ac) The identification of PLESs in UBUAs of the central urban districts in 2012, 2018, and 2022; (d) the legend of these figures; (ej) the identification of PLESs in UBUAs of Jiawang District, Xinyi City, Pizhou City, Pei County, Feng County, and Suining County in 2012, 2018, and 2022, respectively.
Sustainability 17 00886 g006
Figure 7. Center of gravity migration of PLESs in NUBUAs.
Figure 7. Center of gravity migration of PLESs in NUBUAs.
Sustainability 17 00886 g007
Figure 8. Overview of the driving factors. (ah) Overview of the DEM, slope, aspect, GDP, population, precipitation, temperature, and NPP, respectively.
Figure 8. Overview of the driving factors. (ah) Overview of the DEM, slope, aspect, GDP, population, precipitation, temperature, and NPP, respectively.
Sustainability 17 00886 g008
Figure 9. Mean q-values in factor detector results for 2012, 2018, and 2022.
Figure 9. Mean q-values in factor detector results for 2012, 2018, and 2022.
Sustainability 17 00886 g009
Figure 10. Interaction detection results of PLES in 2012, 2018, and 2022. The data marked with green boxes represent two-factor enhancement, while all others indicate non-linear enhancement.
Figure 10. Interaction detection results of PLES in 2012, 2018, and 2022. The data marked with green boxes represent two-factor enhancement, while all others indicate non-linear enhancement.
Sustainability 17 00886 g010
Table 1. Data description.
Table 1. Data description.
Data TypeData NameData Source
Point dataPOIAMAP inside
Land cover dataCLCDWuhan University
Administrative division spatial dataBasic geographic dataNational geographic Information Resource Catalog Service System
Map dataOpen Street Map (OSM)Open-source website: OSM
Statistical dataArea of built districtsXuzhou statistical yearbook
Precipitation data1 km monthly mean temperature dataset for ChinaResource and environment science data platform
Temperature data1 km monthly precipitation dataset for ChinaNational earth system science data center
Terrain dataDEMNASA
Socio-economic dataGDPXuzhou statistical yearbook
Demographic dataXuzhou statistical yearbook
Net Primary Productivity (NPP) dataData product of MOD17A3H.006PIE-Engine
Table 2. Reclassification and comprehensive weight calculation results of POI data.
Table 2. Reclassification and comprehensive weight calculation results of POI data.
Spatial TypeSub-CategoriesPOI TypeP1P2P
Living spaceService-oriented
living space
Food and Beverage Services0.0280100.028
Shopping Services0.0242200.484
Hotel Accommodation0.0356100.356
Lifestyle Services0.0954151.431
Automotive Services0.0108100.108
Public Facilities0.0122150.183
Science, Education and Culture0.1882254.705
Sports and Leisure0.0216100.216
Healthcare Services0.1721203.442
Residential living spaceBusiness Residences0.0501502.505
Production spaceService-oriented
production space
Business Districts0.0463301.389
Financial Institutions0.0439200.878
Enterprise-oriented
production space
Industrial Parks0.0297702.079
Corporate Enterprises0.0632503.160
Transportation-oriented production spaceTransportation Facilities0.0874151.311
Roadside Facilities0.0140100.140
Ecological spaceService-oriented
ecological space
Parks and Green Spaces0.0374903.366
Scenic Spots and Landmarks0.0274902.466
Cultural Landscapes0.0126300.378
Table 3. The description of different spatial types of PLESs in this study.
Table 3. The description of different spatial types of PLESs in this study.
Function TypeSpatial TypeDescription
Single-function spaceLiving space (LS)One function of PLES dominates or only one function exists in the unit
Production space (PS)
Ecological space (ES)
Dual-function spaceSub-living space (Sub-LS)Two functions of PLES are predominant or only two functions are present in similar proportion in the
unit
Sub-production space (Sub-PS)
Sub-ecological space (Sub-ES)
Living–production space (LPS)Two functions of PLES are predominant or only two functions are present in significantly different
proportion in the unit
Living–ecological space (LES)
Production–ecological space (PES)
Mixed-function spaceMixed space (MS)Three functions of PLES with similar proportions or one of the functions is approximately the sum of the other two similar proportions in the unit
Table 4. Classification framework of PLESs in NUBUAs.
Table 4. Classification framework of PLESs in NUBUAs.
Spatial TypeDominant FunctionCLCD Type
Living–production spaceRural or urban livingImpervious
Production–ecological spaceCropsCropland
Ecological spaceAquatic or greenery ecosystemForest, Shrub, Grassland, Water, Barren, Wetland
Table 5. Accuracy validation results for urban built-up area extraction.
Table 5. Accuracy validation results for urban built-up area extraction.
YearExtracted Area (km2)Statistical Area (km2)Error (%)
2012421.16403.14.48
2018462.07454.71.62
2022533.04497.17.23
Table 6. The confusion matrix of PLES verification results for UBUAs in 2022.
Table 6. The confusion matrix of PLES verification results for UBUAs in 2022.
PLES 1LSPSESSub-LSSub-PSSub-ESLPSLESPESMSN 2PA (%)
LS4275210133501248687.86
PS21190000002012396.74
ES0079000000079100
Sub-LS0007200000072100
Sub-PS010048010005096.00
Sub-ES006003000103781.08
LPS314456133061138984.83
LES004101024003080.00
PES000001002402596.00
MS0000000001313100
N2460129958855363663029161304-
UA (%)92.8392.2583.1681.8287.2883.3390.1680.0082.7681.25--
OA89.42%Kappa0.86
1 The horizontal table header is the comparison data obtained through visual interpretation of remote sensing images; the vertical table header is the PLES results obtained based on POI data identification. 2 The number of validation units.
Table 7. The areas of PLESs in UBUAs (km2).
Table 7. The areas of PLESs in UBUAs (km2).
PLES TypeXuzhou CityThe Central Urban Districts
201220182022201220182022
LS263.23223.72261.3970.9966.0070.48
PS19.9918.9717.4510.2813.489.11
ES5.1111.7610.673.376.1410.44
Sub-LS51.2165.1166.0122.9130.3128.00
Sub-PS9.6016.1418.384.597.0910.77
Sub-ES1.504.255.200.911.174.56
LPS53.5597.69117.0720.9732.5637.91
LES12.3915.8717.366.6410.879.16
PES1.884.235.410.752.093.60
MS2.714.3314.101.862.298.61
Table 8. The areas of PLESs in NUBUAs (km2).
Table 8. The areas of PLESs in NUBUAs (km2).
PLES TypePESLPSES
Year201220182022201220182022201220182022
The central urban district1554.971500.121473.79581.42618.15637.51102.4176.4266.74
Jiawang 408.78394.24390.56166.94183.11191.1329.6828.9226.05
Pizhou1623.501592.041576.17376.76411.12425.8349.7946.8843.55
Peixian939.08920.52907.39259.48273.92275.8713.3614.4814.33
Xinyi1166.351139.121125.35269.45296.98309.88122.37121.86118.41
Fengxian1134.431108.671096.91268.36295.12303.7611.2212.7112.36
Suining1405.581369.181348.75300.71334.19345.2122.0224.2923.83
Table 9. The transfer matrix of PLESs in UBUAs from 2012 to 2022 (km2).
Table 9. The transfer matrix of PLESs in UBUAs from 2012 to 2022 (km2).
YearPLES TypeLSPSESSub-LSSub-PSSub-ESLPSLESPESMS
2012–2018LS-5.216.0832.950.14060.07015.180.35
PS10.01-0.122004.640.123.780
ES0.20.01-0000.14.3300
Sub-LS28.693.751.45-00.214.946.674.320.06
Sub-PS1.830.40.090.44-04.0202.520
Sub-ES0.040.390.110.570-0.180.2200
LPS27.615.510.648.7500.04-3.270.262.66
LES0.15000002.24-00
PES0.510.160.070.07000.610-0
MS002.57000000-
2018–2022LS-3.360.0818.046.580.0617.6716.970.346.84
PS16.15-02.884.030.011.57000
ES5.570-2.090.10.0510.010.032.67
Sub-LS30.750.610.01-0.353.7810.060.030.011.39
Sub-PS000.140-00000
Sub-ES00.04000-0000
LPS54.212.320.3415.892.180.06-0.040.120.07
LES3.290.1200007.87-4.330
PES15.562.090.010.741.6206.460-0
MS0.010.2400002.7400-
Table 10. The transfer matrix of PLESs in NUBUAs from 2012 to 2022 (km2).
Table 10. The transfer matrix of PLESs in NUBUAs from 2012 to 2022 (km2).
YearPLES TypePESLPSES
2012–2018PES-1684.07308.72
LPS598.05-97.37
ES43.5412.74-
2018–2022PES-501.63129.40
LPS346.09-21.20
ES77.1927.99-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, C.; Dong, S. Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City. Sustainability 2025, 17, 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886

AMA Style

Wang W, Zhao Y, Ma C, Dong S. Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City. Sustainability. 2025; 17(3):886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Weilin, Yindi Zhao, Caihong Ma, and Simeng Dong. 2025. "Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City" Sustainability 17, no. 3: 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886

APA Style

Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Ma, C., & Dong, S. (2025). Identification and Analysis of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study of Xuzhou City. Sustainability, 17(3), 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop