Next Article in Journal
Agroecology and Precision Agriculture as Combined Approaches to Increase Field-Scale Crop Resilience and Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Dynamic Mechanisms of the Synergetic Development of Construction Industry Clusters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector

by
Marcus Jerome Byrne
*,
Michele John
and
Wahidul Biswas
Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(3), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030960
Submission received: 6 November 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 24 January 2025

Abstract

This paper introduces a comprehensive sustainability assessment framework integrating Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) with Scenario Planning and Sensitivity Analysis, using the alumina industry as a case study. Current sustainability frameworks often focus narrowly on carbon emissions, neglecting broader environmental and social impacts, such as biodiversity loss, land rehabilitation, and social equity. By combining LCSA with forward-looking Scenario Planning, the proposed framework provides a multi-dimensional assessment, enabling industries to anticipate future challenges and adapt to technological, regulatory, and market changes. The analysis of Australia’s alumina production under Net-Zero and Accelerated Net-Zero scenarios demonstrates significant decarbonisation potential, achieving up to 97% emission reductions while improving energy efficiency by 50%. Despite these advances, indicators like biodiversity preservation and social equity remain insufficiently addressed, underscoring the need for a more holistic, industry-specific approach. Future research directions include improving measurement methods for ecological and social indicators, exploring policy mechanisms to enhance adoption, and establishing partnerships with international bodies like the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative to ensure global adaptability. The increasing adoption of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) methodologies highlights the need for comprehensive impact management and higher standards of governance. Although the proposed framework has notable strengths, its reliance on region-specific quantifiable indicators and simplified models limits its global adaptability. The proposed framework advocates for a mandatory, independent regulatory mechanism to drive balanced, transparent reporting, supporting industries in achieving transformative sustainability outcomes.
Keywords: life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA); scenario planning; decarbonisation; alumina; sustainability framework life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA); scenario planning; decarbonisation; alumina; sustainability framework

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Byrne, M.J.; John, M.; Biswas, W. Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector. Sustainability 2025, 17, 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030960

AMA Style

Byrne MJ, John M, Biswas W. Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector. Sustainability. 2025; 17(3):960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Byrne, Marcus Jerome, Michele John, and Wahidul Biswas. 2025. "Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector" Sustainability 17, no. 3: 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030960

APA Style

Byrne, M. J., John, M., & Biswas, W. (2025). Future Risk from Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for the Resource Sector. Sustainability, 17(3), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop