How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Overview and Theoretical Hypotheses
2.1. Literature Overview
2.2. Theoretical Hypotheses
3. Model and Variable Selection
3.1. Model and Variables
3.2. Data Source
4. Empirical Results and Discussion
4.1. Descriptive Statistical Analysis
The Regressive Results
4.2. Robustness Test
5. Conclusions and Policy Suggestion
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xu, X.X.; Wang, X.B.; Shu, Y. Local officials and economic growth: Evidence from the Chinese provincial governors and party secretaries. Econ. Res. J. 2007, 9, 18–31. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.B.; Zhou, L.A. Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. J. Public Econ. 2005, 89, 1743–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachs, J.D.; Warner, A.M. Sources of slow growth in African economies. J. Afr. Econ. 1997, 6, 335–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A.; Aadland, D. The curse of natural resources: An empirical investigation of U.S. counties. Resour. Energ. Econ. 2001, 33, 440–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deacon, R.T. The political economy of the natural resource curse: A survey of theory and evidence. Found. Trends Microecon. 2011, 7, 111–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Ploeg, F. Natural resources: Curse or blessing? J. Econ. Liter. 2011, 49, 366–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobsen, G.D.; Parker, D.P. The Economic Aftermath of Resource Booms: Evidence from Boomtowns in the American West. Econ. J. 2016, 126, 1092–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawer, E.T.; Lukas, M.C.; Jørgensen, S.H. The neglected role of local institutions in the ‘resource curse’ debate. Limestone mining in the Krobo region of Ghana. Resour. Policy 2017, 54, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Weingast, B. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. J. Econ. Perspect. 1997, 11, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Roland, G. Federalism and the soft budget constrain. Am. Econ. Rev. 1998, 88, 1143–1162. [Google Scholar]
- Maskin, E.; Qian, Y.-Y.; Xu, C.-G. Incentives, scale economics, and organization forms. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2000, 67, 359–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanchard, O.; Shleifer, A. Federalism with and without political centralization: China vs. Russia in transitional economics: How much progress? IMF Staff Pap. 2001, 48, 171–179. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Zhou, L. Relative performance Evaluation and the turnover of provincial leaders in China. Econ. Lett. 2005, 88, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X. Fiscal Decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for growth and inequality. J. Comp. Econ. 2006, 34, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.Q.; Chen, B. Assignment of provincial officials based on economic performance: Evidence from China. China Econ. Rev. 2016, 38, 60–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ran, R. Political incentives and local environmental governance under the ‘pressure system’. Comp. Soc. Syst. 2012, 3, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
- Tonts, M.; Plummer, P.; Lawrie, M. Socio-economic wellbeing in Australian mining towns: A comparative analysis. J. Rural Stud. 2012, 28, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takatsuka, H.; Zeng, D.Z.; Zhao, L.X. Resource-based cities and the Dutch disease. Resour. Energ. Econ. 2015, 40, 57–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.J.; Li, H.Q.; Jia, X.P.; Li, Q. Improving resource utilization efficiency in China’s mineral resource-based cities: A case study of Chengde, Hebei province. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 94, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbieri, E.; Fontúrbel, F.E.; Herbas, C.; Barbieri, F.L.; Gardon, J. Indoor metallic pollution and children exposure in a mining city. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, B.; Xia, D.S.; Yu, Y.; Jia, J.; Nie, Y.; Wang, X. Detecting the sensitivity of magnetic response on different pollution sources—A case study from typical mining cities in northwestern China. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 207, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russell, C.S.; Powell, P.T. Choosing Environmental Policy Tools; Working Paper ENV-102; Inter-American Development Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Fredriksson, P.G. The Political economy of pollution taxes in a small open economy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1997, 33, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez, R.; Mitra, S. Corruption, pollution and the Kuznets environment curve. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2000, 40, 50–137. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, A.L. The search for sustainable legitimacy: Environmental, law and bureaucracy in China. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 2013, 36, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tosun, J. Political parties and marine pollution policy: Exploring the case of Germany. Mar. Policy 2011, 35, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskin, E.; Qian, Y.; Xu, C. Incentives, information and organizational form. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2000, 67, 1359–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.A.; Li, H.B.; Chen, Y. Relative performance appraisal: An empirical study on the promotion mechanism of local officials in China. China J. Econ. 2005, 1, 83–96. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Qiao, K.Y. The re-examination of promotion mechanism of Chinese officials: Evidence from provincial and municipal governments. J. Financ. Econ. 2013, 4, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, W.C.; Gao, N.; Zha, J.P. Performance claims, government intervention and regional environmental pollution: An empirical analysis of Chinese city-level data. China Econ. Stud. 2015, 5, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, N.; Lu, H.Y. Officials vertical exchange and environmental governance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Party Secretaries and Mayors in 109 Cities. J. Public Manag. 2016, 13, 31–43. [Google Scholar]
- James, M.; Edward, R.M.; Nancy, D.O. Environmental policy when market structure and plant locations are endogenous. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1993, 24, 69–86. [Google Scholar]
- Kunce, M.; Shogren, J.F. Destructive Inter-jurisdictional competition: Firm, capital and labor mobility in a model of direct emission control. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 3, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weingast, B. Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. J. Urban Econ. 2009, 65, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konisky, D.M.; Woods, N.D. Exporting air pollution?-Regulatory enforcement and environmental free Riding in the United States. Polit. Res. Q. 2010, 4, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oates, W.E. Fiscal and regulatory competition: Theory and evidence. J. Trans. Foreign Lit. Econ. 2007, 2, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigman, H. Decentralization and environmental quality: An international analysis of water pollution levels and variation. Land Econ. 2014, 90, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, X.C.; Chen, H. Dynamic relationship between economic growth and environmental pollution and regional differences—An empirical analysis based on panel data of resource-exhausted cities. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 31, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
- Li, L.; Lei, Y.L.; Pan, D.Y.; Si, C.Y. Research on sustainable development of resource-based cities based on the DEA approach: A case study of Jiaozuo, China. Math. Prob. Eng. 2016, 2016, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, L.J.; Wang, B.C.; Fan, L.; Wu, J.G. Analyzing sustainability of Chinese mining cities using an association rule mining approach. Resour. Policy 2016, 49, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.W.; Chai, M.; Cheng, J.L.; Jin, J.; Yang, Y.F.; Nie, Z.Q.; Huang, Q.F.; Li, Y.H. Contamination and health risks of heavy metals in street dust from a coalmining city in eastern China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 138, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, J.; Feng, C.T.; Zeng, G.M.; Gao, X.; Zhong, M.Z.; Li, X.D.; Li, X.; He, X.Y.; Fang, Y.L. Spatial distribution and source identification of heavy metals in surface soils in a typical coal mine city, Lianyuan, China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, W.C.; Gao, N.; Gong, Q. Public appeals, official incentives and regional environmental governance. Zhejiang Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 23–35. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, S.Q.; Wan, G.H.; Sun, W.Z.; Luo, D.L. Public appeals and urban environmental governance. Manag. World 2013, 6, 72–84. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.H.; Chen, Y.F.; Guo, J.; Wang, G.; Gong, Y. Spatial concentration, impact factors and prevention-control measures of PM2.5 pollution in China. Nat. Hazards 2016, 86, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.C.; He, Q.Y. Performance of regional economic growth and environmental pollution accident: A perspective of official performance appeal. World Econ. Pap. 2013, 2, 20–35. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, K.; Eastin, J. Do developing countries invest up? The environmental effects of foreign direct investment from less-developed countries. World Dev. 2012, 40, 2221–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.R. The experience of American city management for reference. Pract. Theory Sezs. 2013, 6, 66–68. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, W.G. The legalization of Japanese urban management and the reference for China. Shanghai Urban Manag. 2009, 18, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, C.; Song, L.J. Problems and reasons in the process of Indian urbanization. Around South Asia 2013, 8, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|
SO2 (ten thousand tons) | 7.7517 | 6.3649 | 0.1245 | 33.1863 |
Fixed (billion yuan) | 484.9572 | 522.2806 | 21.2472 | 3096.893 |
Fdi (billion dollars) | 2.8563 | 4.1386 | 0.0023 | 24.1025 |
Indus (percentage) | 33.0312 | 5.8968 | 16.99 | 48.29 |
Edup (yuan) | 0.1920 | 0.1197 | 0.07264 | 1.0641 |
Density (people/square kilometer) | 387.188 | 270.4572 | 37.1951 | 1013.61 |
Position year (mayor) (year) | 2.70 | 1.51 | 1 | 9 |
Improve (mayor) | 0.6143 | 0.4874 | 0 | 1 |
Company experience (mayor) | 0.3587 | 0.4802 | 0 | 1 |
Major (mayor) | 0.6830 | 0.4659 | 0 | 1 |
Explanatory Variable | Mayors | Municipal Party Secretaries | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLS Test | Fixed Effect | Random Effect | OLS Test | Fixed Effect | Random Effect | |
Cons | 4.7652 *** | 8.8889 ** | 8.6042 *** | 4.5745 *** | 7.5783 ** | 8.9268 *** |
(5.31) | (2.66) | (8.40) | (5.35) | (2.26) | (8.44) | |
Fixed | 0.3638 *** | −0.0548 | 0.0698 | 0.3808 *** | −0.0467 | 0.0515 |
(4.56) | (−0.70) | (0.90) | (4.67) | (−0.60) | (0.67) | |
Fdi | 0.0347 | −0.0949 ** | −0.0442 | 0.0270 | −0.1076 ** | −0.0681 * |
(0.74) | (−2.33) | (−1.13) | (0.53) | (−2.69) | (−1.73) | |
Indus | −0.0011 | −0.0065 | −0.0026 | −0.0029 | −0.0070 | −0.0032 |
(−0.13) | (−0.75) | (−0.32) | (−0.32) | (−0.80) | (−0.38) | |
Edup | 0.0088 | 0.0610 ** | 0.0311 | 0.0075 | 0.0609 ** | 0.0380 |
(0.28) | (2.29) | (1.16) | (0.24) | (2.24) | (1.40) | |
Density | 0.0991 | 0.6492 | 0.2909 ** | 0.0952 | 0.9053 | 0.3331 ** |
(1.49) | (1.10) | (2.63) | (1.41) | (1.53) | (2.66) | |
Position year | −0.0282 | −0.0157 | −0.0211 | −0.0290 | −0.0344 * | −0.0347 * |
(−1.03) | (−0.78) | (−0.99) | (−0.89) | (−1.71) | (−1.66) | |
Improve | 0.0895 | 0.0844 | 0.0790 | −0.0624 | 0.0493 | 0.0383 |
(0.97) | (1.24) | (1.11) | (−0.68) | (0.73) | (0.56) | |
Company experience | 0.1620 | 0.0098 | 0.0553 | 0.0999 | −0.1290 * | −0.0852 |
(1.64) | (0.12) | (0.68) | (0.98) | (−1.84) | (0.0720) | |
Major | −0.5870 *** | −0.1273 * | −0.2094 ** | −0.2826 ** | −0.1185 * | −0.1406 ** |
(−7.00) | (−1.72) | (−2.73) | (−3.22) | (−1.73) | (−1.18) | |
F | 20.11 | 15.69 | 15.21 | 17.90 | ||
Prob > F | 0.0000 | 0.0296 | 0.0000 | 0.0066 | ||
R-squared | 0.0522 | 0.0272 | 0.0641 | 0.0470 | ||
Hausman | - | Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 | Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 |
Explanatory Variable | Mayor | Municipal Party Secretaries |
---|---|---|
L. Y | −0.0116 | −0.0085 |
(−0.20) | (−0.15) | |
Fixed | −0.0256 | 0.0080 |
(−0.23) | (0.07) | |
Fdi | −0.0950 * | −0.1245 ** |
(−1.96) | (−2.60) | |
Indus | −0.0182 * | −0.0163 |
(−1.75) | (−1.54) | |
Edup | −0.0013 | −0.0262 |
(−0.01) | (−0.29) | |
Density | 0.5811 | 0.6866 |
(0.85) | (1.01) | |
Position year | −0.0168 | −0.0541 ** |
(−0.77) | (−2.47) | |
Improve | 0.1366 * | 0.0595 |
(1.82) | (0.76) | |
Company experience | −0.0508 | −0.1098 |
(−0.58) | (−1.37) | |
Major | −0.0940 | −0.0990 |
(−1.07) | (−1.25) | |
AR(1) | −12.94 (0.000) | −12.69 (0.000) |
AR(2) | −0.28 (0.778) | −0.08 (0.936) |
Sargan test (P-value) | 0.068 | 0.076 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, H.; Xiong, L.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, D. How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities? Sustainability 2017, 9, 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111941
Zhang H, Xiong L, Qiu Y, Zhou D. How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities? Sustainability. 2017; 9(11):1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111941
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Huiming, Lifang Xiong, Yueming Qiu, and Dequn Zhou. 2017. "How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities?" Sustainability 9, no. 11: 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111941
APA StyleZhang, H., Xiong, L., Qiu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2017). How Have Political Incentives for Local Officials Reduced Environmental Pollution in Resource-Depleted Cities? Sustainability, 9(11), 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111941