Next Article in Journal
Review of Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Based on Deep Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Sample Plots Forestry Parameters Verification and Updating Using Airborne LiDAR Data
Previous Article in Journal
Landslides Triggered by the 2016 Heavy Rainfall Event in Sanming, Fujian Province: Distribution Pattern Analysis and Spatio-Temporal Susceptibility Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on Single-Tree Extraction Method for Complex RGB Point Cloud Scenes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172

Robotics and Autonomus Systems Group, CSIRO Data61, Pullenvale, QLD 4069, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2739; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112739
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Point Clouds in Forest Remote Sensing II)
Text Correction
There was an error in the original publication [1]. Appendix A was not up-to-date when published.
A correction has been made to Appendix A (The corrected Appendix A shows below):

Appendix A. Sensitivity

From Equation (2) the compliance for the smoothed densities  x ¯  can be expressed as a sum over all elements i:
c ( x ¯ ) = i E ˜ u i T k i u i
where  E ˜  is defined in Equation (6) as the product of two terms. Using the product rule, the differential with respect to each smoothed element density  x ¯ i  can then be written as the sum of two terms:
c ( x ¯ ) x ¯ i = a i u i T k i u i + j b i j u j T k j u j
where
a i = A ( x ¯ i ) α p x ¯ i p 1 ( E S E V )
and
b i j = α A ( x ¯ j ) α 1 E V + x ¯ j p ( E S E V ) max ( r i j , 1 )
The sensitivity with respect to the unsmoothed design variable  x  is then:
c ( x ¯ ) x i = j N e W i j x ^ i ( β ) c ( x ¯ ) x ¯ j j N e W i j
where
x ^ i ( β ) = β 1 tanh 2 ( β ( x i ˜ 0.5 ) ) 2 tanh ( 0.5 β )
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Correction: Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112739

AMA Style

Lowe T, Pinskier J. Correction: Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(11):2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lowe, Thomas, and Joshua Pinskier. 2023. "Correction: Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172" Remote Sensing 15, no. 11: 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112739

APA Style

Lowe, T., & Pinskier, J. (2023). Correction: Lowe, T.; Pinskier, J. Tree Reconstruction Using Topology Optimisation. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 172. Remote Sensing, 15(11), 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop