Next Article in Journal
Complexation of the Mycotoxin Cyclopiazonic Acid with Lanthanides Yields Luminescent Products
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Toxin Occurrences in Ten French Water Resource Reservoirs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/toxins10070284
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxicity Assay for Citrinin, Zearalenone and Zearalenone-14-Sulfate Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as Model Organism

by
Julia Keller
1,
Antje Borzekowski
1,
Hajo Haase
2,
Ralph Menzel
3,
Liliane Rueß
3 and
Matthias Koch
1,*
1
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Reference Materials, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und-Prüfung (BAM), Richard-Willstätter-Str. 11, 12489 Berlin, Germany
2
Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Technische Universität Berlin, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 Berlin, Germany
3
Institute of Biology, Ecology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(7), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070284
Submission received: 24 May 2018 / Revised: 17 June 2018 / Accepted: 6 July 2018 / Published: 9 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To keep pace with the rising number of detected mycotoxins, there is a growing need for fast and reliable toxicity tests to assess potential threats to food safety. Toxicity tests with the bacterial-feeding nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as the model organism are well established. In this study the C. elegans wildtype strain N2 (var. Bristol) was used to investigate the toxic effects of the food-relevant mycotoxins citrinin (CIT) and zearalenone-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S) and zearalenone (ZEA) on different life cycle parameters including reproduction, thermal and oxidative stress resistance and lifespan. The metabolization of the mycotoxins by the nematodes in vivo was investigated using HPLC-MS/MS. ZEA was metabolized in vivo to the reduced isomers α-zearalenol (α-ZEL) and β-ZEL. ZEA-14-S was reduced to α-/β-ZEL-14-sulfate and CIT was metabolized to mono-hydroxylated CIT. All mycotoxins tested led to a significant decrease in the number of nematode offspring produced. ZEA and CIT displayed negative effects on stress tolerance levels and for CIT an additional shortening of the mean lifespan was observed. In the case of ZEA-14-S, however, the mean lifespan was prolonged. The presented study shows the applicability of C. elegans for toxicity testing of emerging food mycotoxins for the purpose of assigning potential health threats.
Keywords:
mycotoxin; toxicity testing; food safety; Caenorhabditis elegans; metabolization
Key Contribution: The nematode C. elegans was used to assess the toxic effects of the food-relevant mycotoxins zearalenone; zearalenone-14-sulfate and citrinin in combination with HPLC-MS/MS measurements of mycotoxin metabolites in vivo.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by a variety of filamentous fungi from across the world, contaminating approximately 25% of all harvested crops [1]. The intake of contaminated food and feed may lead to different kinds of acute and chronic diseases in humans and animals [2]. From 400–500 already known mycotoxins, only 11 are regulated and monitored by authorities within the EU [3,4]. Maximum levels have been set for zearalenone (ZEA) (Figure 1), which is mainly found in cereal crops such as maize, barley, wheat and rice, and is produced by several molds of the genus Fusarium [5,6]. ZEA induces estrogenic symptoms—such as uterine enlargement, vulvovaginitis or infertility—in higher animals such as rats, pigs or cows [7]. By causing DNA-adduct formation in in vitro cultures of bovine lymphocytes and in female mouse tissues ZEA has also been shown to act genotoxically [8,9]. Further toxic effects of ZEA are lipid peroxidation, cell death and the inhibition of protein and DNA synthesis [10]. In cultured pig, mouse and cattle, hepatocytes ZEA is metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes during phase I biotransformation to its reduced metabolites α-zearalenol (α-ZEL) and β-ZEL [11] (Figure 1). Using human and rat liver microsomes it has also been shown that ZEA may undergo oxidation to several mono-hydroxylated metabolites [12]. Furthermore, fungi and plants are able to modify ZEA by conjugation with sulfate or glucose at the aromatic OH-positions [13]. Mycotoxins and their modified forms are a cause of great concern for food safety and could pose a serious health risk due to their yet unknown toxic effects [14]. ZEA-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S) (Figure 1) was originally found in cultures of Fusarium graminearum and is often detected in cereal-, soy- and corn-based products [15,16]. The nephro-, hepato- and cytotoxic mycotoxin citrinin (CIT) (Figure 1) is mainly found in stored grains [17]. Produced by molds of the Penicillium, Monascus and Aspergillus genus, CIT often co-occurs with the highly nephrotoxic and carcinogenic mycotoxin ochratoxin A and can be found in foodstuffs like breakfast cereals or rice [18,19,20]. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), there is still a substantial need for research to evaluate the occurrence and toxicity of CIT [21].
In order to evaluate the potential health risks posed by mycotoxins, in particular for emerging detected substances, reliable toxicity tests are necessary. Toxicity testing of mycotoxins is usually carried out by performing in vitro assays, or alternatively it is evaluated using laboratory animals like mice, rats or chickens in in vivo studies [22]. Since 1974 when Sydney Brenner described the cultivation and handling of Caenorhabditis elegans, this worm has been widely used as a model organism in developmental biology and neurology [23,24]. Due to its many advantages—such as its easy and cost-effective cultivation, the fact that the nematodes genome is completely sequenced and its short generation time—it also plays an growing role in toxicological research [25]. Finally, the high number of conserved genes between mammals and C. elegans make the worm an ideal candidate for toxicological investigations [26,27].
Surprisingly, to date, few studies are known to have used C. elegans to assess the toxic effects of mycotoxins. Yang et al. [28] described the multi-toxic endpoints of aflatoxin B1, deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisin B1, T-2 toxin and ZEA using the C. elegans wildtype strain N2. They determined the lethality endpoint for ZEA with a LC50 of 75.79 mg/L and investigated alterations in lifespan and reproduction as well as morphological changes. The nematodes were all negatively affected by ZEA and the other tested mycotoxins [28]. Gowrinathan et al. [29] evaluated the toxicity of DON by performing partial and complete brood size assays using the C. elegans wildtype strain and a mutant strain (AU1) that has enhanced susceptibility to pathogens. The toxic effects of aflatoxin B1 in C. elegans were investigated by Feng et al. [30] by evaluating germline apoptosis, alteration of growth and reproduction. They found that the DNA damage response pathway was associated with the AFB1-induced germline apoptosis, which is highly relevant to reproductive and growth dysfunction in the worms.
Scientific studies in toxicological fields have improved the current knowledge of mycotoxins in food and feed. However, most concerns are linked to potential health risks of mycotoxins and their modified forms. Beside established toxicity tests with cell cultures or using mammalian models the toxicity testing with C. elegans can be an additional and valuable tool in mycotoxin research. Compared to toxicological experiments with cell cultures, assays with C. elegans provide data from a whole organism with intact and metabolically active systems [25]. In the present study we used C. elegans to investigate the toxic effects of the food-relevant mycotoxins CIT, ZEA and ZEA-14-S, on different life cycle parameters including reproduction, thermal and oxidative stress tolerance and lifespan. These are standard parameters in toxicological research with C. elegans and cover the most important toxic effects. Because no model is perfect, the assessment of multiple toxic endpoints could increase the sensitivity of the test and lead to more reliable results. Furthermore, for the first time, the metabolization of the mycotoxins in the worms was determined using HPLC-MS/MS to better understand the observed toxic effects in C. elegans.

2. Results and Discussion

To determine the toxicological impact of ZEA, ZEA-14-S and CIT on C. elegans as model organism different concentrations were tested. In case of CIT concentrations of 2.5 mg/L (10 µM), 12.5 mg/L (50 µM) and 62.5 mg/L (250 µM) were used according to findings from other studies [31,32]. For ZEA and ZEA-14-S concentrations of 7.5 mg/L (ZEA: 24 µM; ZEA-14-S: 19 µM) and 37.5 mg/L (ZEA:118 µM; ZEA-14-S: 95 µM) were used like described in Yang et al. [28] and adapted for the present study.

2.1. Metabolization of Mycotoxins In Vivo

After five days of cultivation on mycotoxin-enriched (CIT 62.5 mg/L, ZEA and ZEA-14-S 37.5 mg/L) and UV-inactivated feeding bacteria the worms were harvested, extracted and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS (1100 series HPLC from Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany coupled to an API 4000 triple-quadrupole MS/MS system from Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) in order to detect derived mycotoxin metabolites. The high conservation of genes and signaling pathways between mammals and C. elegans was shown in several studies and should result in the same or at least partially the same metabolic pattern of mycotoxins which have been found in mammalian models [25]. In the present study, ZEA was reduced in vivo by C. elegans to a lesser extent to α-ZEL and β-ZEL (Figure 2A) confirmed using standard solutions of α-ZEL and β-ZEL and the corresponding mass transitions (Figure 2B; residual ZEA not shown). The reduction of ZEA to its two stereoisomeric metabolites has already been widely described for mammals and is now shown in C. elegans, too [13,33]. Beside reductive metabolic reactions, also the oxidation of ZEA to its mono-hydroxylated metabolites was described by Pfeiffer et al. [34]. The formation of reduced and oxidized ZEA species is mainly catalyzed by several isoforms of cytochrome P450 enzymes. C. elegans has several CYP isoforms similar to those in higher animals and therefore the hydroxylation of ZEA is conceivable. However, during this study the analysis of extracted worms revealed no mono-hydroxylated ZEA metabolites or possible phase II metabolites like glucuronides.
Comparable to ZEA, the conjugated form ZEA-14-S was reduced to ZEL-14-S by C. elegans (Figure 2D). Due to the lack of a standard substance, currently no conclusion can be drawn about whether there are two stereoisomeric forms, and which stereoisomer it was that was metabolized. Surprisingly, in worms fed with ZEA-14-S no free ZEA was found, indicating that the worm is either not capable or only negligibly capable of deconjugating ZEA-14-S. In higher animals like pigs or in the deconjugation of ZEA-14-S in humans, the main biotransformation reaction is caused by bacteria in the colon during digestion processes by hydrolysis [13,35].
CIT was oxidized by C. elegans to its mono-hydroxylated form OH-CIT (Figure 2C). The major metabolite of CIT, OH-CIT, is found in human blood plasma and urine as a biomarker [36]. By testing the cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of OH-CIT compared to CIT, Föllman et al. [31] revealed that OH-CIT formation was a process of detoxification. It is conceivable that the key cellular metabolic pathways in C. elegans are to a certain extent conserved, leading to reduced and oxidized metabolites of mycotoxins which have been already described in mammalian models. Even if the metabolites are comparable, C. elegans lacks most mammalian organs and it would be not realistic to expect that C. elegans can be used to replace toxicological analyses in mammals. However, C. elegans as affordable and rapid model system could be a powerful tool in combination with other toxicity testing strategies and offers the opportunity to achieve relatively fast first toxicological data about emerging substances.
Beside the extracts derived from nematode biomass, the bacterial food solutions were extracted and measured with the same HPLC-MS/MS method. No metabolization of the added mycotoxin solution was detected (data not shown), indicating that the UV irradiation used effectively killed OP50 bacteria. This reveals UV irradiation to be an appropriate method for toxicity tests with bacterial consumers like C. elegans, as in contrast to killing using heat, UV light leaves the bacterial surface unaffected and unaltered. The use of heat to kill depresses the food quality of bacteria, potentially posing an additional stress to bacterial consumers, which can consequently distort toxicity testing.

2.2. Lifespan Assay

A preliminary conclusion about the negative or positive effects of exogenous substances can be drawn by performing lifespan assays. According to the log-rank test, which is used to determine whether experimental treatments significantly altered the lifespan or not, ZEA-14-S significantly prolonged lifespan compared to the control group treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), as shown in Figure 3A. The mean lifespan was extended by up to 9.8 ± 4.4% compared to the control group (Figure 3B). Several studies have described the life-prolonging effects of compounds in low doses that at higher concentrations induce toxic effects—the hormetic effect [37]. It is plausible that ZEA-14-S causes a mild stress in that low concentration range, leading to a slightly increased mean lifespan. The increased occurrence of deaths in the ZEA-14-S-treated group starting after 18 days (Figure 3A) may be due to the accumulation of the mycotoxin itself in the worm or of the derived metabolization products such as ZEL-14-S.
In Yang et al.’s study [28] treatment with ZEA using 10% of the estimated LC50 of ZEA, in this case 7.6 mg/L caused strong toxic effects, leading to a significant decrease in lifespan. However, the nearly same concentration of ZEA used in the present study did not cause a significant change in the mean lifespan compared to the control group but did lead to a shortened maximum lifespan (Figure 3A,B). Toxic effects may have accumulated over its lifetime and thus caused increased mortality of the test group after a certain point of time, in this case after 17 days of adulthood. However, in the Yang et al. study [28] 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUdR) was used to simplify the lifespan assay process. As side effects, in adult worms, 5-FUdR slightly reduced the pharyngeal pumping rate, produced changes in body size and morphology, and increased superoxide dismutase levels [38]. The strong, toxic effects observed by Yang et al. [28] may have been caused by the simultaneous use of two substances, the toxin and the progeny blocker 5-FUdR.
Both concentrations of CIT tested had a significant negative effect on the lifespan of C. elegans (Figure 3A). The highest concentration of citrinin with 12.5 mg/L led to an increased mortality rate compared to the test group with 2.5 mg/L of citrinin. The mean lifespan was decreased to 11.5 ± 1.3 days (CIT 2.5 mg/L) and 11.0 ± 1.5 days (CIT 12.5 mg/L) which is a reduction of 17.1 ± 4.1% and 20.8 ± 5.5% compared to the control group (Figure 3B). The influence the CIT’s concentration has on the alteration of lifespan is greater during the first ten days of adulthood. This concentration dependence nearly vanished after 11 days and the lifespan curves ran similarly from that point on. It is conceivable, that it was the conversion of CIT to the less toxic mono-hydroxylated CIT, observed by HPLC-MS/MS measurements that caused this effect.

2.3. Brood Size Assay

The average number of offspring after three days was significantly reduced at all tested concentrations (Figure 4). Compared to the number of offspring of the control group, with 72.2 ± 8.9 larvae, CIT decreased the number of nematode offspring produced significantly to 40.4 ± 9.6 (12.5 mg/L) and 23.1 ± 6.4 (62.5 mg/L). Among other toxic effects CIT has also been found to negatively affect the reproductive system. In Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice 2.5 and 5.0 µM of CIT reduced the oocyte maturation rate, as well as fertilization and embryo development [39]. Furthermore, female rats that were mated with CIT-treated males displayed a reduced pregnancy rate, as shown by Qingqing et al. [40].
Treatment with ZEA led to a reduction in the number of offspring to 39.0 ± 9.6 (7.5 mg/L) and 31.7 ± 6.1 by using 37.5 mg/L of ZEA, respectively. ZEA is known to cause various estrogenic effects in laboratory and domestic animals such as decreased fertility or alterations in the reproductive tract, whereby pigs and sheep appear to be more significantly affected by ZEA than rodents [33]. The influence of mycotoxins on reproductive fitness had also been previously shown by Yang et al. who observed negative effects on the N2 nematode’s reproduction in the case of fumonisin B1, aflatoxin B1, T-2 toxin and ZEA. Toxic effects on reproduction were more pronounced with higher concentration in all three tested mycotoxins, as shown in Figure 4. ZEA and ZEA-14-S had comparable toxic effects on reproduction. To date, only a few studies have investigated the toxic effects of conjugated mycotoxin forms, although modified toxins represent an emerging problem. Conjugation with glucose or sulfate is a known detoxification process in plants and it is supposed that conjugated mycotoxins possess a lower toxicity compared to their parental compounds. However, in this study, ZEA-14-S reduced the number of offspring to an average of 41.9 ± 9.4 (7.5 mg/L) and 36.3 ± 5.3 (37.5 mg/L) individuals.
The comparatively strong effect of ZEA-14-S in the reproduction assay is remarkable (Figure 4), particularly in light of its dramatically decreased estrogenicity at the estrogen receptor level compared to ZEA [41]. As an r-selected species C. elegans starts reproduction early, and a lowered progeny could result in the reduction or even the extinction of a population as reproductive fitness is a crucial factor for maintaining population size. To sum up, C. elegans appears to be an appropriate candidate for testing the reproductive toxicity of mycotoxins.

2.4. Oxidative and Thermal Stress Resistance Assay

The treatment of C. elegans with CIT and ZEA led to a significantly increased mortality rate after 8 h of oxidative stress to 70.2 ± 5.6% (CIT) and 70.6 ± 2.1% (ZEA), compared to the control group with 53.7 ± 1.8%, as shown in Figure 5. Pascual-Ahuir et al. [42] investigated the mechanisms of CIT toxicity using the quantitative yeast model and observed the cellular defense mechanism in response to the mycotoxin. They concluded that CIT triggered the activation of stress responsive promoters like the glucocorticoid response element 2 (GRE2) and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2). Consequently, the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) could be the predominant toxicity mechanism of CIT. Hassen et al. [43] investigated the role of oxidative stress in ZEA-mediated toxicity by performing test assays with human HepG2 cells. This cell type responded to ZEA treatment with a loss of cell viability and the induction of oxidative DNA damage. Findings in the present study indicated that the ZEA-induced toxicity in C. elegans could be related to oxidative damage in the worms. For both mycotoxins there are indications that toxic effects in the worms could be probably driven by stress responsive factors. As a result, during this specific assay, these toxins perhaps negatively affected the stress resistance of C. elegans and thus led to enhanced mortality. Under thermal induced stress, N2 wildtype nematodes treated with CIT (62.5 mg/L) and ZEA (37.5 mg/L) showed higher mortality rates compared to the untreated control group (and ZEA-14-S). However, studies concerning the modes of toxicity caused by ZEA-14-S are still lacking. Several studies have found that in C. elegans longevity and stress resistance are linked [44]. Thus, it might be surprising that after having slightly positive effects on lifespan, ZEA-14-S failed to induce statistically significant changes in either the thermal stress assay or the oxidative stress assay. However, not all long-lived nematodes are more stress resistant and Cypser et al. [45] even proposed that thermal stress resistance and lifespan alteration were triggered by different molecular signals [46,47].

3. Conclusions

To date, toxicological data for modified mycotoxins like ZEA-14-S or emerging mycotoxins like CIT are scarce or even non-existent. The model organism C. elegans that can provide a bridge between conventional in vitro and in vivo assays using mammalian models was used in this study as a simple, high throughput and cost-effective method to evaluate the toxicity of selected mycotoxins. Only a few toxicological studies on modified mycotoxins have already been carried out and reveal deconjugation to free mycotoxins as a preferred pathway of biotransformation. However, data obtained in this study showed the reduction of ZEA-14-S to ZEL-14-S in C. elegans. Probably due to the highly conserved genes and metabolic pathways between C. elegans and mammals, the metabolization of ZEA to its reduced and more estrogenic isomers α-ZEL and β-ZEL was found, as well as the mono-hydroxylation of CIT. There is still a considerable need for further research concerning the metabolic fate and toxicity of food-relevant mycotoxins. In combination with identification techniques such as HPLC-MS/MS and high-resolution mass spectrometry or other toxicological model systems C. elegans is an ideal candidate for first toxicity screenings, not only in mycotoxin research.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Substances

Citrinin was purchased from Fermentek (Jerusalem, Israel) with a purity of 98%. Zearalenone was purchased from SantaCruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) with a purity of 99%. Zearalenone-14-sulfate was produced by a double-staged biosynthesis and preparative fractionation as previously described [48]. α-zearalenol (α-ZEL), β-ZEL and dimethyl sulfoxide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). All standard chemicals were of p.a. grade, and all solvents of HPLC grade. Nematode growth media (NGM) powder was purchased from USBio (Salem, MA, USA) and lysogeny broth (LB) medium from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). One liter of NGM medium was prepared as recommended by the manufacturer by adding 25 mL of 1M phosphate buffer (pH 6), 1 mL of 1 M CaCl2 and 1 M MgSO4 (both purchased from Merck KGaA; Darmstadt, Germany). Ultrapure water was produced using a Seralpur PRO 90 CN system (Seral Reinstwassersysteme GmbH, Ransbach-Baumbach, Germany).

4.2. Strains and Conditions

The C. elegans wildtype strain N2 was used and maintained at 20 °C on sterile NMG media. As a food source, Escherichia coli OP50 bacteria were used according to Brenner, 1974 [23]. The wildtype strain N2 and OP50 bacteria were kindly derived by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota). For the cultivation of OP50 bacteria one colony was picked from an LB agar plate and brought in liquid LB medium and was shaken slightly over night at 37 °C. To kill the bacteria, sterilized quartz vessels were filled with 20 mL of the freshly prepared culture and irradiated by UV-C light at λ = 254 nm for 2 h by gentle shaking. The inactivation of bacteria was tested by plating them on LB agar and incubating them overnight at 37 °C; no bacteria growth was observed. Mycotoxins were added to the UV-killed bacteria to obtain final concentrations between 2.5 mg/L and 62.5 mg/L. Equal amounts of test solutions were used for all conditions (final concentration of 0.3% [v/v] DMSO) and control solutions were mixed with DMSO.

4.3. Lifespan Assay

For each treatment 20–30 L4 larvae—easily distinguishable by the presence of a small, white half-circle patch in the worm midsection—were transferred with a small platinum wire to 70 × 15 mm petri dishes with 1 mL of mycotoxin containing bacteria and cultivated at 20 °C. From the following generation (F1), 150 L4 larvae were transferred to five small plates (35 × 12 mm) with 15 individuals per plate representing one trial. Two to four trials were performed per concentration. The number of surviving and dead animals were counted every day and the dead animals were removed from the plate. Individuals that died from internal hatching or that crawled out of the NMG medium were considered as being neither dead or alive and were excluded from the assay. Animals that failed to react after being gently touched with the platinum wire were rated as dead. During their reproductive phase (approx. 5 days) nematodes were transferred daily to avoid starvation or the mixing of generations and were fed with 150 µL of bacteria. After that, worms were transferred every two to three days. Plates contaminated with bacteria or molds were dismissed from the trial. Statistical significance for alteration of the mean lifespan was calculated using the log-rank test provided online by the Bioinformatics at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/russell/logrank).

4.4. Brood Size Assay

L4 larvae (F1) were separated on small petri dishes and the offspring of each worm was counted after three days of adulthood. The total number of offspring was determined, and the statistical significance was calculated using One-way ANOVA. Two to three trials per condition and control were performed, with at least 20 animals per trial.

4.5. Thermal and Oxidative Stress Resistance Assay

For every concentration and trial about 20–30 L4 larvae (F1) were used. On the sixth day of adulthood, untreated and treated animals were moved to 35 °C incubation for 8 h and the number of dead and surviving nematodes were counted for the thermal stress resistance assay. For the oxidative stress resistance assay nematodes were transferred to M9 buffer containing 0.8 mM hydrogen peroxide and were incubated at 20 °C for 8 h. Nematodes were gently touched with a platinum wire. If they failed to respond, they were counted as dead. The statistical significance was calculated by using One-way ANOVA.

4.6. Cultivation and Extraction of Nematodes for Metabolite Analysis

Cultivation Mixed cultures were grown on NGM agar on 60 big petri dishes. To avoid starvation OP50 mixed with the test substances was provided during cultivation at 25 °C at least once a day. After five days of cultivation nematodes were rinsed from the plates using ice-cold M9 buffer, collected in 50 mL tubes and stored for the duration on ice. Worms were washed three times with 10 mL of M9 buffer to remove bacteria. In between, worms were allowed to settle to the bottom; afterwards the supernatant was always removed from the worm pellet. The final pellets were kept frozen at −80 °C for further extraction and analysis.
Extraction About 500 µL of worm pellet was dissolved with 4.5 mL of acetonitrile-water mixture (80:20 v/v) and treated for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath. After subsequent shaking with a horizontal shaker for 30 min at 330 min−1, samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 2931× g at 20 °C. For further analysis, 1 mL of the supernatant was evaporated under nitrogen at 40 °C and re-dissolved in HPLC eluent (65:35 v/v acetonitrile-water with 0.1% formic acid). For the extraction of OP50 bacteria an overnight culture was UV-killed and mixed with mycotoxin dissolved in DMSO (or only pure DMSO as control) and stored for 5 days at 4 °C to simulate the maximal usage time for a bacteria solution. About 10 mL of the bacteria culture was centrifuged for 10 min at 3828× g. The supernatant was kept and stored at −80 °C and the bacteria pellet was washed twice with M9 buffer. The extraction of the supernatant and bacteria was performed in the same way as the extraction of the worms.

4.7. HPLC–MS/MS Analysis

HPLC–MS/MS measurements were performed using a 1100 series HPLC from Agilent Technologies (Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to an API 4000 triple-quadrupole MS/MS system (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). A Synergi Polar–RP column (150 mm × 3 mm; particle size: 4 µm; pore size: 80 Å) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA) was used. The column oven was set to 40 °C and the solvents used were water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) using a flow rate of 800 µL/min. The gradient was as follows: 0–1 min isocratic with 35% B, 1–29 min linear to 100% B, isocratic 29–34 min 100% B, shifting back to 35% B and reconditioning from 35–40 min. The injection volume used was 20 µL and the ESI was operated in the negative ionization mode at 450 °C. The settings were as follows:
Curtain gas 20 psi, collision gas 8 psi, ion source gas 1 and 2 with 60 psi, respectively, and an ionization voltage of −4500 V. The MS/MS measurements were performed in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Mass transitions were recorded as follows for the investigated analytes by using a declustering potential of −60 V and a collision energy of −30 eV: ZEA m/z 317.1 → quantifier m/z 130.1/qualifier m/z 174.8; ZEL m/z 319.2 → 174.0/160.0; ZEA-14-S m/z 397.1 → 317.1/175.0; ZEL-14-S m/z 399.2 → 319.2/275.2; CIT m/z 249.0 → 205.0, OH-CIT m/z 265.0 → 221.0.

Author Contributions

J.K., H.H., R.M. and L.R. planned and designed the experiments; J.K., R.M. and A.B. performed the experiments; J.K. and M.K. analyzed the data; J.K. wrote the paper and H.H., L.R., R.M. and M.K. contributed substantially to the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van Egmond, H.P.; Jonker, M.A. Worldwide Regulations for Mycotoxins in Food and Feed in 2003; FAO Food and Nutrition Paper; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004; Volume 81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marin, S.; Ramos, A.J.; Cano-Sancho, G.; Sanchis, V. Mycotoxins: Occurrence, Toxicology, and Exposure Assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 60, 218–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Van Egmond, H.P.; Schothorst, R.C.; Jonker, M.A. Regulations Relating to Mycotoxins in Food. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Petroczi, A.; Nepusz, T.; Taylor, G.; Naughton, D.P. Network Analysis of the Rasff Database: A Mycotoxin Perspective. World Mycotoxin J. 2011, 4, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caldwell, R.W.; Tuite, J.; Stob, M.; Baldwin, R. Zearalenone Production by Fusarium Species. Appl. Microbiol. 1970, 20, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Schollenberger, M.; Muller, H.M.; Rufle, M.; Suchy, S.; Plank, S.; Drochner, W. Natural Occurrence of 16 Fusarium Toxins in Grains and Feedstuffs of Plant Origin from Germany. Mycopathologia 2006, 161, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zinedine, A.; Soriano, J.M.; Molto, J.C.; Manes, J. Review on the Toxicity, Occurrence, Metabolism, Detoxification, Regulations and Intake of Zearalenone: An Oestrogenic Mycotoxin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lioi, M.B.; Santoro, A.; Barbieri, R.B.; Salzano, S.S.; Ursini, M.V. Ochratoxin A and Zearalenone: A Comparative Study on Genotoxic Effects and Cell Death Induced in Bovine Lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 2004, 557, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pfohlleszkowicz, A.; Chekirghedira, L.; Bacha, H. Genotoxicity of Zearalenone, an Estrogenic Mycotoxin—DNA Adduct Formation in Female Mouse-Tissues. Carcinogenesis 1995, 16, 2315–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abid-Essefi, S.; Ouanes, Z.; Hassen, W.; Baudrimont, I.; Creppy, E.; Bacha, H. Cytotoxicity, Inhibition of DNA and Protein Syntheses and Oxidative Damage in Cultured Cells Exposed to Zearalenone. Toxicol. In Vitro 2004, 18, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Malekinejad, H.; Maas-Bakker, R.; Fink-Gremmels, J. Species Differences in the Hepatic Biotransformation of Zearalenone. Vet. J. 2006, 172, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pfeiffer, E.; Schebb, N.H.; Podlech, J.; Metzler, M. Novel Oxidative In Vitro Metabolites of the Mycotoxins Alternariol and Alternariol Methyl Ether. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Binder, S.B.; Schwartz-Zimmermann, H.E.; Varga, E.; Bichl, G.; Michlmayr, H.; Adam, G.; Berthiller, F. Metabolism of Zearalenone and Its Major Modified Forms in Pigs. Toxins 2017, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cottrill, B.; Cravedi, J.P.; Di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the Risks for Public Health Related to the Presence of Zearalenone in Food EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. EFSA J. 2011, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Plasencia, J.; Mirocha, C.J. Isolation and Characterization of Zearalenone Sulfate Produced by Fusarium spp. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1991, 57, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Boevre, M.; Di Mavungu, J.D.; Landschoot, S.; Audenaert, K.; Eeckhout, M.; Maene, P.; Haesaert, G.; De Saeger, S. Natural Occurrence of Mycotoxins and Their Masked Forms in Food and Feed Products. World Mycotoxin J. 2012, 5, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, B.J.; Jia, X.Q.; Gu, L.J.; Sung, C.K. Review on the Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Mycotoxin Citrinin. Food Control 2006, 17, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scott, P.M.; Vanwalbe, W.; Kennedy, B.; Anyeti, D. Mycotoxins (Ochratoxin-A, Citrinin, and Sterigmatocystin) and Toxigenic Fungi in Grains and Other Agricultural Products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nguyen, M.T.; Tozovanu, M.; Tran, T.L.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A. Occurrence of Aflatoxin B1, Citrinin and Ochratoxin A in Rice in Five Provinces of the Central Region of Vietnam. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Molinie, A.; Faucet, V.; Castegnaro, P.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A. Analysis of Some Breakfast Cereals on the French Market for Their Contents of Ochratoxin A, Citrinin and Fumonisin B-1: Development of a Method for Simultaneous Extraction of Ochratoxin A and Citrinin. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Böhm, J.; De Saeger, S.; Edler, L.; Fink-Gremmels, J.; Mantle, P.; Peraica, M.; Stetina, R.; Vrabcheva, T. Scientific Opinion on the Risks for Public and Animal Health Related to the Presence of Citrinin in Food and Feed. EFSA 2012, 10, 1–82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fraeyman, S.; Croubels, S.; Devreese, M.; Antonissen, G. Emerging Fusarium and Alternaria Mycotoxins: Occurrence, Toxicity and Toxicokinetics. Toxins 2017, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brenner, S. The Genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974, 77, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Sengupta, P.; Samuel, A.D.T. Caenorhabditis elegans: A Model System for Systems Neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hunt, P.R. The C-Elegans Model in Toxicity Testing. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017, 37, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Koelle, M.R.; Horvitz, H.R. EGL-10 Regulates G Protein Signaling in the C-Elegans Nervous System and Shares a Conserved Domain with Many Mammalian Proteins. Cell 1996, 84, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brose, N.; Hofmann, K.; Hata, Y.; Sudhof, T.C. Mammalian Homologs of Caenorhabditis-Elegans Unc-13 Gene Define Novel Family of C-2-Domain Proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 25273–25280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, Z.D.; Xue, K.S.; Sun, X.L.; Tang, L.L.; Wang, J.S. Multi-Toxic Endpoints of the Foodborne Mycotoxins in Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxins 2015, 7, 5224–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gowrinathan, Y.; Pacan, J.C.; Hawke, A.; Zhou, T.; Sabour, P.M. Toxicity Assay for Deoxynivalenol Using Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Addit. Contam. A 2011, 28, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Feng, W.H.; Xue, K.S.; Tang, L.L.; Williams, P.L.; Wang, J.S. Aflatoxin B-1-Induced Developmental and DNA Damage in Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxins 2017, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Follmann, W.; Behm, C.; Degen, G.H. Toxicity of the Mycotoxin Citrinin and Its Metabolite Dihydrocitrinone and of Mixtures of Citrinin and Ochratoxin A in Vitro. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Flajs, D.; Peraica, M. Toxicological Properties of Citrinin. Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Toksikologiju 2009, 60, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Minervini, F.; Dell’aquila, M.E. Zearalenone and Reproductive Function in Farm Animals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 2570–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hildebrand, A.A.; Pfeiffer, E.; Rapp, A.; Metzler, M. Hydroxylation of the Mycotoxin Zearalenone at Aliphatic Positions: Novel Mammalian Metabolites. Mycotoxin Res. 2012, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dall’erta, A.; Cirlini, M.; Dall’asta, M.; Del Rio, D.; Galaverna, G.; Dall’asta, C. Masked Mycotoxins Are Efficiently Hydrolyzed by Human Colonic Microbiota Releasing Their Aglycones. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013, 26, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Blaszkewicz, M.; Munoz, K.; Degen, G.H. Methods for Analysis of Citrinin in Human Blood and Urine. Arch. Toxicol. 2013, 87, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gems, D.; Partridge, L. Stress-Response Hormesis and Aging: “That Which Does Not Kill Us Makes Us Stronger”. Cell Metab. 2008, 7, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gruber, J.; Ng, L.F.; Poovathingal, S.K.; Halliwell, B. Deceptively Simple but Simply Deceptive–Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan Studies: Considerations for Aging and Antioxidant Effects. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 3377–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chan, W.-H. Effects of Citrinin on Maturation of Mouse Oocytes, Fertilization, and Fetal Development in Vitro and in Vivo. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 180, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Han, Q.; Yu, L.; Guo, Y.; Liu, S. Toxic Effects of Citrinin on the Male Reproductive System in Mice. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2012, 64, 465–469. [Google Scholar]
  41. Drzymala, S.S.; Binder, J.; Brodehl, A.; Penkert, M.; Rosowski, M.; Garbe, L.-A.; Koch, M. Estrogenicity of Novel Phase I and Phase II Metabolites of Zearalenone and Cis-Zearalenone. Toxicon 2015, 105, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pascual-Ahuir, A.; Vanacloig-Pedros, E.; Proft, M. Toxicity Mechanisms of the Food Contaminant Citrinin: Application of a Quantitative Yeast Model. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hassen, W.; Ayed-Boussema, I.; Oscoz, A.A.; Lopez, A.D.C.; Bacha, H. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Zearalenone-Mediated Toxicity in Hep G2 Cells: Oxidative DNA Damage, Gluthatione Depletion and Stress Proteins Induction. Toxicology 2007, 232, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Johnson, T.; Henderson, S.; Murakami, S.; De Castro, E.; De Castro, S.H.; Cypser, J.; Rikke, B.; Tedesco, P.; Link, C. Longevity Genes in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Also Mediate Increased Resistance to Stress and Prevent Disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2002, 25, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cypser, J.R.; Tedesco, P.; Johnson, T.E. Hormesis and Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp. Gerontol. 2006, 41, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Munoz, M.J.; Riddle, D.L. Positive Selection of Caenorhabditis elegans Mutants with Increased Stress Resistance and Longevity. Genetics 2003, 163, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Doonan, R.; Mcelwee, J.J.; Matthijssens, F.; Walker, G.A.; Houthoofd, K.; Back, P.; Matscheski, A.; Vanfleteren, J.R.; Gems, D. Against the Oxidative Damage Theory of Aging: Superoxide Dismutases Protect against Oxidative Stress but Have Little or No Effect on Life Span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene Dev. 2008, 22, 3236–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Borzekowski, A.; Drewitz, T.; Keller, J.; Pfeifer, D.; Kunte, H.-J.; Koch, M.; Rohn, S.; Maul, R. Biosynthesis and Characterization of Zearalenone-14-Sulfate, Zearalenone-14-Glucoside and Zearalenone-16-Glucoside Using Common Fungal Strains. Toxins 2018, 10, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 10 00284 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the tested mycotoxins (shown in bold) and their related metabolites with their respective molecular weight.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the tested mycotoxins (shown in bold) and their related metabolites with their respective molecular weight.
Toxins 10 00284 g001
Toxins 10 00284 g002 550
Figure 2. Worms fed for five days with mycotoxin containing OP50 bacteria were extracted and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS in ESI negative mode using the multiple reaction mode with specific mass transitions given in material and methods. MRM chromatograms of worms treated with (A) zearalenone (37.5 mg/L) were compared with (B) a standard solution containing α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol. (C) citrinin (62.5 mg/L) and (D) zearalenone-14-sulfate (37.5 mg/L) are illustrated in black, whereas their metabolites are shown in red. Cps—counts per second.
Figure 2. Worms fed for five days with mycotoxin containing OP50 bacteria were extracted and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS in ESI negative mode using the multiple reaction mode with specific mass transitions given in material and methods. MRM chromatograms of worms treated with (A) zearalenone (37.5 mg/L) were compared with (B) a standard solution containing α-zearalenol and β-zearalenol. (C) citrinin (62.5 mg/L) and (D) zearalenone-14-sulfate (37.5 mg/L) are illustrated in black, whereas their metabolites are shown in red. Cps—counts per second.
Toxins 10 00284 g002
Toxins 10 00284 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Survival curves of C. elegans treated with single concentrations of citrinin (CIT 2.5 mg/L, 12.5 mg/L), zearalenone (ZEA 7.5 mg/L), zearalenone-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S 7.5 mg/L) and untreated controls. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 and were determined using the log-rank test; (B) The percentage change of mean lifespan compared to the control group during exposure to CIT, ZEA and ZEA-14-S. Each bar represents the mean of two to four trials with a total of at least 154 nematodes per concentration. (A,B) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. (A) Survival curves of C. elegans treated with single concentrations of citrinin (CIT 2.5 mg/L, 12.5 mg/L), zearalenone (ZEA 7.5 mg/L), zearalenone-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S 7.5 mg/L) and untreated controls. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.001 and were determined using the log-rank test; (B) The percentage change of mean lifespan compared to the control group during exposure to CIT, ZEA and ZEA-14-S. Each bar represents the mean of two to four trials with a total of at least 154 nematodes per concentration. (A,B) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05.
Toxins 10 00284 g003
Toxins 10 00284 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of mycotoxins on the brood size of C. elegans after three days of reproduction, determined with at least 26 animals per concentration, displayed as the average of three trials; error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with ** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Effects of mycotoxins on the brood size of C. elegans after three days of reproduction, determined with at least 26 animals per concentration, displayed as the average of three trials; error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with ** p < 0.001.
Toxins 10 00284 g004
Toxins 10 00284 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of 62.5 mg/L citrinin (CIT), 37.5 mg/L zearalenone (ZEA) and 37.5 mg/L zearalenone-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S) on the oxidative and thermal stress resistance of C. elegans. On the sixth day of adulthood, alive and dead animals were counted after a treatment of 8 h at 35 °C for the thermal stress resistance assay (black bars) and after an 8 h exposure to 0.8 mM hydrogen peroxide for the oxidative stress resistance assay (grey bars). At least 174 nematodes per mycotoxin were scored for the thermal stress assay and 122 for the oxidative stress assay. Bars show the average of all three trials and the error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of 62.5 mg/L citrinin (CIT), 37.5 mg/L zearalenone (ZEA) and 37.5 mg/L zearalenone-14-sulfate (ZEA-14-S) on the oxidative and thermal stress resistance of C. elegans. On the sixth day of adulthood, alive and dead animals were counted after a treatment of 8 h at 35 °C for the thermal stress resistance assay (black bars) and after an 8 h exposure to 0.8 mM hydrogen peroxide for the oxidative stress resistance assay (grey bars). At least 174 nematodes per mycotoxin were scored for the thermal stress assay and 122 for the oxidative stress assay. Bars show the average of all three trials and the error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Differences compared to the control were considered as significant with * p < 0.05.
Toxins 10 00284 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Keller, J.; Borzekowski, A.; Haase, H.; Menzel, R.; Rueß, L.; Koch, M. Toxicity Assay for Citrinin, Zearalenone and Zearalenone-14-Sulfate Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as Model Organism. Toxins 2018, 10, 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070284

AMA Style

Keller J, Borzekowski A, Haase H, Menzel R, Rueß L, Koch M. Toxicity Assay for Citrinin, Zearalenone and Zearalenone-14-Sulfate Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as Model Organism. Toxins. 2018; 10(7):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Keller, Julia, Antje Borzekowski, Hajo Haase, Ralph Menzel, Liliane Rueß, and Matthias Koch. 2018. "Toxicity Assay for Citrinin, Zearalenone and Zearalenone-14-Sulfate Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as Model Organism" Toxins 10, no. 7: 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070284

APA Style

Keller, J., Borzekowski, A., Haase, H., Menzel, R., Rueß, L., & Koch, M. (2018). Toxicity Assay for Citrinin, Zearalenone and Zearalenone-14-Sulfate Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as Model Organism. Toxins, 10(7), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop