Next Article in Journal
Genomics of Maize Resistance to Fusarium Ear Rot and Fumonisin Contamination
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural and Functional Insights into the C-terminal Fragment of Insecticidal Vip3A Toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity in Cattle: An In Vitro Whole-Transcriptomic Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced Membrane-Bound Alkaline Phosphatase Does Not Affect Binding of Vip3Aa in a Heliothis virescens Resistant Colony
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/toxins12070430
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins against Coleopteran Pests

by
Mikel Domínguez-Arrizabalaga
1,
Maite Villanueva
1,2,
Baltasar Escriche
3,
Carmen Ancín-Azpilicueta
4 and
Primitivo Caballero
1,*
1
Institute for Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology-IMAB, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31192 Mutilva, Navarra, Spain
2
Bioinsectis SL, Avda Pamplona 123, 31192 Mutilva, Navarra, Spain
3
Departamento de Genética/ERI BioTecMed, Universitat de València, Burjassot, 46100 València, Spain
4
Departamento de Ciencias, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(7), 430; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070430
Submission received: 4 June 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 25 June 2020 / Published: 29 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: Functional Characterization and Mechanism of Action)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacillus thuringiensis is the most successful microbial insecticide agent and its proteins have been studied for many years due to its toxicity against insects mainly belonging to the orders Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera, which are pests of agro-forestry and medical-veterinary interest. However, studies on the interactions between this bacterium and the insect species classified in the order Coleoptera are more limited when compared to other insect orders. To date, 45 Cry proteins, 2 Cyt proteins, 11 Vip proteins, and 2 Sip proteins have been reported with activity against coleopteran species. A number of these proteins have been successfully used in some insecticidal formulations and in the construction of transgenic crops to provide protection against main beetle pests. In this review, we provide an update on the activity of Bt toxins against coleopteran insects, as well as specific information about the structure and mode of action of coleopteran Bt proteins.
Keywords:
Bacillus thuringiensis proteins; coleopteran pests; insecticidal activity; structure; mode of action
Key Contribution: This contribution provide an update on the activity of Bt toxins against coleopteran insects.

1. Introduction

The use of entomopathogenic microorganisms as biological control agents has become one of the most effective alternatives to chemical pest control. Among all, the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is the most important entomopathogenic microorganism used to date in crop protection. This bacterium is widely distributed in various ecological niches, such as water, soil, insects, and plants [1]. The feature that distinguishes B. thuringiensis from other members of the Bacillus group is the capacity to produce parasporal crystalline inclusions. These crystals are composed of proteins (Cry and Cyt) which are toxic against an increasing number of insect species from the orders Lepidoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera, among others, as well as against other organisms such as mites [2] and nematodes [3]. Bt also synthesizes insecticidal toxins associated with the vegetative growth phase, named Vip (vegetative insecticidal protein) and Sip (secreted insecticidal protein), which are secreted into the growth medium [4]. These toxins are uniquely specific, safe, and completely biodegradable, and have been used for more than 60 years as an alternative to chemical insecticides [5]. Products based on Bt isolates are the most successful microbial insecticides, with current worldwide benefits estimated at $8 billion annually [6]. However, not all Bt proteins are designated as toxins, for example, some parasporins do not have known insect targets, although they are toxic to human cancer cells [7]. The insecticidal activity of Bt toxins has also been transferred to crop plants through genetic engineering, providing very high protection levels against injurious pests and decreasing the use of chemical insecticides in many instances [8,9]. The success of these insecticidal proteins has fuelled the search for new Bt isolates and proteins that can render novel insecticidal agents with different specificities.
Since Schnepf and Whiteley cloned the first cry gene in the early 1980′s [10], many others have been described and are now classified according to Bt Toxin Nomenclature, that consists of four ranks based on amino acid sequence identity [11]. To date, the Bt Toxin Nomenclature Committee [12] has reported at least 78 Cry protein groups, from Cry1 to Cry 78, divided into at least three phylogenetically non-related protein subfamilies that may have different modes of action: the three-domain Cry toxins (3-domain), the mosquitocidal Cry toxins (Etx_Mtx2), Toxin_10 proteins, and alpha-helical toxins (reviewed in [13,14]).
The largest group, with more than 53 Cry toxin subgroups, is the 3-domain Cry toxin group. Even though the sequence identity among these proteins is low, the overall structure of the three domains is quite similar, providing proteins with different specificities but with quite similar modes of action [15]. Thus, proteins such as Cry1Aa (lepidopteran specific) and Cry3Aa (coleopteran specific) have a 32.5% identity but a structural similarity as high as 98% [16]. Phylogenetic analysis shows that the great variability in the insecticidal activity of this 3-domain group has resulted from the independent evolution of the three structural domains as well as from the swapping of domain III between different toxins [15].
Due to their feeding habits, many species of coleoptera cause serious damage to both cultivated plants and stored products, leading to significant economic losses in all regions of the world [17,18]. Both larvae and adults have strong jaws, which enable them to feed on a wide variety of plant substrates, such as roots, stems, leaves, grains or wood [19]. Beetles represent the order of the Insecta class that includes the largest number of species. However, the studies carried out to identify toxins of B. thuringiensis active against beetles are far from being equal to those carried out in the order Lepidoptera. Thus, 45 Cry proteins, 2 Cyt proteins, 11 Vip proteins, and 2 Sip proteins have been reported with activity against coleopteran insects to date, of which the toxins of the Cry3 and Cry8 families have the largest host spectrum (Figure 1). In this review, we provide an update on the activity of Bt toxins against coleopteran pests.

2. The Crystal Coleopteran-Active Proteins

Bt crystal proteins (δ-endotoxins) are produced during the stationary growth phase and have been isolated from a wide range of insect pests. These crystal inclusions are mainly formed by Cry and Cyt proteins that are toxic to a wide variety of insect species. Most of the information on the insecticidal properties has been obtained for the Cry3 family, and only a few data come from other Cry families. The Cyt proteins constitute a smaller group, mainly active against dipterans, although some Cyt proteins are toxic to coleopteran pests and increase the potential of certain Cry toxins [20].

2.1. Protein Structure

As mentioned above, Bt Cry proteins can be basically subdivided into three different groups according to their homology and molecular structure: the 3-domain group, Etx_Mtx2 proteins, Toxin_10 proteins, and alpha-helical toxins. The 3-domain Cry proteins constitute the largest and best-studied group, although there is increasing information on the ‘non-3-domain’ and Cyt proteins.

2.1.1. The 3-Domain Group Toxins

All 3-domain Cry proteins are produced as protoxins of two main sizes, a ~130 kDa protoxin and shorter one of approximately 70 kDa [16] (Figure 2). The 130 kDa proteins share a highly conserved C terminus containing 15-17 cysteine residues, which is dispensable for toxicity but necessary for the formation of intermolecular disulphide bonds during crystal formation [15,21]. This group has been mainly studied on lepidopteran toxins such as Cry1A, but also includes some coleopteran active toxins such as Cry7A and Cry8. The structure of the small protoxins is quite similar to the N-terminal half of the large toxin group. Since these do not contain the C-terminal extension, they require, in some cases, the presence of accessory proteins for crystallization [22,23]. This second group includes Cry2A, Cry11A, and some toxins active against Coleoptera, such as Cry3A or Cry3B. Proteolytic cleavage of the N-terminal peptide and the C-terminal extension (mainly in the long Cry protoxins) yields active ~ 60 kDa protease-resistant fragments [24]. The first crystal structure solved by X-Ray crystallography was the coleopteran-specific Cry3Aa [25]. Since then, the tertiary structure of other six 3-domain Cry active proteins, including Cry1Aa, Cry2Aa, Cry3Bb, Cry4Aa, Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba and Cry8Ea, has been determined [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Among all, Cry3Aa, Cry3Bb and Cry8Ea have been defined as coleopteran-active proteins (Figure 3A,B). Using the FATCAT server [32], the structural alignment between these anti-coleopteran proteins is significantly similar, despite their low sequence identity. Pardo-López et al. [16] analyzed the structural similarity between Cry1Aa and the other 3-domain Cry proteins aforementioned, indicating the same structural likeness. The marked similarity in terms of the structure of the 3-domain Cry proteins, despite the low sequence identity and the differences in specificity, has rendered different proteins with similar modes of action.
Domain I consists of six α-helix surrounding a hydrophobic helix-α5. This domain, which shares strong similarities with the structure of the pore-forming domain of α+PFTs colicin A, might be responsible for membrane penetration and pore formation [23]. The binding domain II is constituted by three antiparallel β-sheets packing together and has an important role in receptor binding affinity. Finally, domain III is a two-twisted anti-parallel β-sheet and is also involved in receptor binding and pore formation [24,34]. Although it has been demonstrated that domains I and II have co-evolved over the years, swapping by homologous recombination of domain III has also been reported [15,35]. Local alignment of coleopteran-active Cry3, Cry7, and Cry8 showed that domain I was strongly conserved while domains II and III diversified [35]. Bt might use this mechanism to get adapted to a new insect host, which may explain the great variability in the biocidal activity of the 3-domain Cry proteins.

2.1.2. Non-3-domain Cry Toxins

In addition to the 3-domain Cry proteins, some unrelated Cry proteins are also designated by the Cry nomenclature: Etx_Mtx2 proteins, Toxin_10 proteins and alpha-helical toxins [4]. The structure and function of Etx_Mtx2 proteins remains unclear, although the similarities with the Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin (closely related to aerolysin) seem to indicate that they may have a β-sheet-based structure and a pore-forming activity [36]. It is important to notice that, while most of them have activity by themselves, some toxins are proposed as protein complexes to induce mortality, such as the Etx_Mtx2 protein Cry23 and the Cry37 protein [37]. The crystal structure of Cry23Aa reveals a single β-stranded domain protein, with structural similarity to several β-pore forming toxins as proaerolysins, produced by other bacterial species [38]. Cry37Aa conforms to a C2 β-sandwich fold, similar to the calcium phospholipid-binding domain observed in human cytosolic phospholipase A2 (Figure 3C) [38]. Moreover, the toxins Cry34 and Cry35 have been reported to have binary activity against coleopteran insects [39,40]. Crystal structures of Cry34Ab and Cry35Ab have been published (Figure 3D). Cry35Ab, a member of Toxin_10 proteins, shows an aerolysin-like fold, containing a β-trefoil N-terminal domain similar to the carbohydrate-binding domain in Mtx1. Cry34Ab is also a member of the aerolysin family with a β-sandwich fold, common among other cytolytic proteins [41].

2.1.3. Cyt Proteins

Similar to the Cry proteins, Cyt proteins are produced as protoxins with a proteolytically activated size of around 25 kDa [20]. As with some Cry proteins, the tertiary structure of some Cyt proteins has already been solved. Cyt1Aa [42], Cyt2Aa [43] and Cyt2Ba [44] show a similar structure composed of a single α−β-domain, with two outer layers of α-helix wrapped around a β-sheet (Figure 3E). Studies performed with peptides of Cyt1A show that α-helix peptides are major structural elements involved in membrane interaction [45] and also in the oligomerization process [46], while the β-strand forms an oligomeric pore with a β-barrel structure into the membrane [43].

2.2. Insecticidal Activity

The vast majority of Cry proteins described to date are toxic to lepidopteran pests, but there are also a few crystal proteins toxic to either coleopteran or dipteran insects, and a small number are toxic to nematodes [47]. Currently, 45 Bt crystal proteins, including Cry, Cyt or binary proteins, have been tested against different coleopteran insects (Table 1).

2.2.1. Host Range

Cry proteins are toxic to a large number of beetle pests. Mainly, the Cry3 group, the best-studied one, has been described with activity against most of the coleopteran species assayed. These Cry proteins, encoded by cry3 genes, were first discovered in the subspecies tenebrionis [48] and san diego [49] although, years later, both strains turned out to be the same subsp. [50]. Since then, more isolates like Bt subsps. tolworthi, kumamotoensis, or kurstaki have been reported to encode a cry3 gene [51,52]. Owing to the well-known activity in important coleopteran pests, such as Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) or Diabrotica spp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), some of these isolates have been developed as bioinsecticides for beetle control [47]. Cry3Aa, Cry3Ba, Cry3Bb and Cry3Ca proteins have shown activity against most major coleopteran families, including Chrysomelidae, Curculionidae, Scarabaeidae, and Tenebrionidae, among others (Table 1). Although Cry3 proteins are the most effective Bt toxins against chrysomelid beetles, the widespread use of Cry3-based insecticides and Bt crops carries the risk of selecting insect biotypes tolerant to that proteins. The appearance of resistant populations of the chrysomelids L. decemlineata, Chrysomela scripta under laboratory conditions or Diabrotica spp. to Bt maize have been reported [53,54,55].
Cry7 and Cry8 groups are comparatively less active on chrysomelids, but they represent a serious alternative to Cry3 proteins. Cry7Aa, formerly known as CryIIIC, is very toxic to Cylas species (Coleoptera: Brentidae) [56], even more than Cry3 protein, but it has no negative effects against Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) or D. undecimpuntata [52]. Moreover, toxicity to Colorado potato beetle has been reported, but only after in vitro solubilization [52], which was countered by a recent report of a Cry7Aa-type protoxin which is active against L. decemlineata without any previous solubilization step [57]. Solubilized Cry7Ab is active against Henosepilachna vigintiomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), but not against Anomala corpulenta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) or Pyrrhalta aenescens (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [57,58]. Cry8-type proteins are toxic to a large number of coleopteran pests, particularly against species in the Scarabaeidae family [59,60,61]. Furthermore, Cry8A and Cry8B proteins have shown activity against the chrysomelids L. decemlineata and Diabrotica spp., Cry8Ca against the tenebrionid Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [62] and Cry8Ka against the curculionid A. grandis [63]. Moreover, some Cry8 proteins, such as Cry8Ea, Cry8Ga or Cry8Na, are very specific, showing different activities against very closely related host species [64,65]. Cry6Aa and Cry6Ba are active against the curculionid beetles Hypera postica and Hypera brunipennis, two of the more important pests in alfalfa [66,67], as well as D. virgifera, which is susceptible to the activated toxin. Cry22 proteins also have activity to a wide spectrum of coleopteran insects. In particular, Cry22A and Cry22B proteins are toxic to coleopterans of the Brentidae, Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae families [56,68,69].
Generally, Bt protein groups are particularly toxic to a certain insect order. However, some proteins may be active against different orders [70]. Mainly lepidopteran proteins Cry1Ba and Cry1Ia have shown activity against the key coleopteran pests A. grandis, A. obctetus, C. scripta and L. decemlineata [71,72,73,74,75,76]. Dual activity against Lepidoptera-Coleoptera has also been demonstrated by Cry9-type proteins. Cry9 toxins exhibit strong activity against main lepidopteran pests, but Cry9Da is also toxic against the scarab Anomala cuprea [77]. Other example of cross-order toxicity is depicted by the dipteran toxin Cry10Aa, which can kill the Cotton boll weevil (A. grandis) [78]. Additionally, Cry51Aa is toxic against Lygus spp. (Hemiptera) and L. decemlineata [79] and Cry55Aa, a typical nematicidal protein, has been reported as toxic to the chrysomelid Phyllotreta cruciferae [80].
Binary toxins, structurally different from classical 3-domain Cry proteins [25], used to be considered as single toxins because both proteins are required to kill their target. To date, two binary complex toxins have been proposed to have activity against beetles. The coleopteran specific Cry23Aa has been assayed together with Cry37Aa protein to kill Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Sacarabaeidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [37]. Furthermore, this protein mixture has been found to be active against Cylas spp. (Coleoptera: Brentidae) and A. obtectus [56,75]. On the other hand, Cry34 protein is only active in association with Cry35 protein [17]. Cry34 and Cry35 are closely related and are often encoded in the same operon, with coordinated function and appearance in crystals [40,81]. The Cry34/Cry35 binary proteins are mainly active against corn rootworms and have been developed for in-plant control in Bt maize [40,82].
B. thuringiensis Cyt proteins have an in vitro cytolytic (hemolytic) activity, hence their name, and show predominant dipteran specificity [24]. However, some of them are also toxic to coleopteran pests, such as Cyt1Aa to C. scripta [72] or Cyt2Ca to the chrysomelids L. decemlineata and Diabrotica spp. [83] and the curculionid Diaprepes abbreviates (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [84,85]. Besides, Cyt proteins improve the activity of Cry proteins. For instance, Cyt1Aa is able to overcome high levels of resistance to Cry3Aa by C. Scripta, playing an important role in resistance management [72].

2.2.2. Genetically Engineered Cry Genes

Recent advances in next generation sequencing and genetic engineering technologies allow the construction of new synthetic cry genes that increase or amplify their toxicity. The domain regions of some lepidopteran-specific proteins have been modified in an attempt to improve their specific activity or broaden their host range [15,153]. The first coleopteran hybrid protein was made by fusing the sequences located in domain III of the cry3A and cry1Aa genes, although unfortunately, it caused the loss of activity against L. decemlineata [154]. Nonetheless, substituting domain III of Cry3Aa with the same domain from Cry1Ab induced activity against WCR (Western corn rootworm) larvae [155]. On a different approach, a cry3Bb1 gene was engineered with five amino acid substitutions to produce the new Cry3Bb1.11098 protein, which increased the activity of the natural protein against WCR [156]. Similarly, a Cry3A variant (eCry3.1Ab) was designed to confer novel activity against rootworms by creating a cathepsin G protease recognition site [157]. This technology has been introduced successfully in the development of transgenic plants, mainly to overcome the appearance of resistance by WCR populations [158].

2.3. Mode of Action

The mode of action has been mostly studied in lepidopteran insects, although it is believed to be similar between different insect orders, with some peculiarities [8]. Briefly, it is widely accepted that the process begins once the target insect ingests the protein and reaches the insect midgut, where it is solubilized and proteolytically activated. Such an activation allows toxins to first bind to their specific receptors in the host cell membrane, then to their oligomerization and, eventually, to the formation of pores in the cell membrane (Figure 4). In this multi-step mode of action, several factors may contribute to protein specificity [159].

2.3.1. Solubilization and Proteolytic Processing

Once proteins reach the host midgut, they are released from their crystal package to initiate the pathogenic process. The crystals are stabilized by disulfide bridges among the C-terminal ends of the protoxins. More recently, the occurrence of 20 kbp DNA fragments with protoxins and 100–300 pb DNA fragments with in vitro proteolytic activated toxins has been established [160]. These DNA fragments have been observed to be associated with different Bt-toxins as Cry1A, Cry2A, etc., however, they have been more extensively studied on Cry8 toxins [21]. The sequence of the DNA fragments is not specific and they are located in plasmids and chromosomes [161]. Bioinformatics modelling suggests that two protoxin regions bind to major grooves and another one, combined with phosphoric acid, binds to the minor groove [162]. The associated DNA should be eliminated by the DNAses in the insect gut for the correct protein activation. In fact, DNA-protein association impairs the specific binding [163].
It is well accepted that solubilization processes are due to the environmental conditions in the susceptible insect midgut, mainly to pH values. Of note, unlike the alkaline midgut of lepidopteran and dipteran insects, beetles have an acidic midgut, suggesting that different solubilization conditions are needed for each protein [164]. For instance, the midgut fluids of L. decemlineata and D. virgifera larvae do not seem to solubilize Cry1B and Cry7Aa1, and only after a previous in vitro solubilization, these proteins become active [52,71]. However, recent reports show that Cry7Ab2 and Cry7Aa2 proteins solubilize into midgut fluids of H. vigintioctomaculata and L. decemlineata larvae, respectively, suggesting that the lack of solubilization involves more factors than pH [57,58]. Cyt proteins dissolve readily under alkaline conditions, especially at pH 8 or higher, and they are harder to solubilize in neutral or slightly acidic pHs, which occurs in coleopteran midguts [72]. Another example of the importance of crystal solubilization was published by Galitsky et al. [28]. They related that differences in toxin solubility, oligomerization and binding for the Cry3-type toxins, in addition to differences in domain III, might explain the different specificities of Cry3A and Cry3B (e.g., WCR is susceptible to Cry3Bb1 but not to Cry3A). Solubilized proteins are proteolytically activated by gut proteases, which generate the toxic three-domain fragment of about 65 kDa [33]. In Lepidoptera and Diptera species, the main proteases present in the alkaline midgut juices are serine proteases, especially trypsin and chymotrypsin proteases [165]. However, the coleopteran species use digestive proteases belonging to cysteine and aspartic proteases and serine proteases are only present in some cases [166]. The presence of different proteases may be an important factor in toxin activation specificity, and improper processing of Bt toxins can involve the development of insect resistances. It has been reported that the combination of Cry3Aa protein and certain protease inhibitors enhances the toxicity against Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) larvae, evidencing that protease inhibitors may play an important role in resistant pests management [110]. Moreover, the relevance of a nicking in the N-terminal end, in the alpha 1–3 of Domain I in the activated Cry3A and Cry8Da toxins, has been shown, which rendered an 8 kDa fragment to obtain a functional 54 kDa toxin for receptor binding [167].

2.3.2. Binding to the Larval Epithelium

The activated toxin is able to bind to specific receptors located in the midgut epithelial cells to form an oligomeric pre-pore structure and alterations in the midgut receptors is a critical step for insect resistance appearance [159]. It has been demonstrated that Cry3Ba protein shares a binding receptor with Cry3Aa and Cry3Ca proteins, although heterologous-competition experiments show that both proteins may have other binding sites and only share one with Cry3Ba3 [168]. It has also been shown that Cry3Bb, Cry3Ca and Cry7Aa proteins competed for the same binding sites in C. puncticollis, so a mutation in the midgut receptor could render all three proteins ineffective [169]. To date, several specific coleopteran binding proteins have been identified. It has been shown that an ADAM metalloprotease can be considered as a Cry3Aa receptor in L. decemlineata, and this binding interaction improves Cry3Aa pore-formation [170]. GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatases (ALP) are also important for the Cry3Aa binding to Tenebrio molitor brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) and are highly expressed when larvae are exposed to Cry3Aa [171]. In the same way, the Cry1Ba toxin binds to ALPs from A. grandis midgut cells [74]. Although some putative cadherines have been previously described [172,173], Fabrick et al. [127] were the first authors reporting a cadherin protein (TmCad1), cloned from T. molitor larval midgut as a Cry3Aa binding receptor. Furthermore, injection of TmCad1 dsRNA into T. molitor larvae conferred resistance to Cry3Aa. Another truncated cadherin protein (DvCad1-CR8–10), isolated from the WCR, binds to activated Cry3Aa, Cry3Bb [118] and also Cry8Ca [62], enhancing the activity of L. decemlineata, Diabrotica spp. and A. diaperinus. Finally, in T. castaeneum larvae, a cadherine (TcCad1) and a sodium solute symporter (TcSSS) have been identified as putative Cry3Ba functional receptors, determinant for the specific Cry protein toxicity against coleopterans [174].
Studied Cry8-binding proteins revealed a difference from those confirmed previously as receptors for Cry1A or Cry3A proteins in lepidopteran and coleopteran insect species, such as aminopeptidases, cadherins or ABCC transporters [175,176]. A Cry8-like toxin without the C-terminal end has been described, which completely shared binding sites with Cry8Ga, despite only sharing 30% of the sequence, in Holotrichia oblita. Cry8Da tested on Popillia japonica BBMV, bound specifically with a 150 kDa membrane protein which shared homology with coleopteran β-glucosidases [177]. Cry8E and Cry8-like toxins showed, in H. parallela and H. oblita, binding to several different proteins. The most relevant for both insect species and Cry8 proteins were serine proteases, sodium/potassium-transporting proteins, and a transferrin-like protein [177,178].
There is evidence that some proteins work together to cause mortality in certain coleopteran species, although the mechanism of interaction between them remains unclear. In this way, it is hypothesized that Cry37 protein may facilitate linkage of channel-forming Cry23 toxin, given their homology to other binding proteins [24]. Moreover, the fact that Cry34Ab has some activity against the Western corn rootworm (WCR) on its own [150] seems to indicate that Cry35 has the role as a receptor of Cry34, which is mainly responsible for toxicity. Cyt proteins enhancing the insecticide potency of certain Cry toxins has been also observed. The Cyt1Aa protein, from Bt sub. israelensis, increases the activity of Cry11Aa toxin by acting as a membrane receptor [178]. Cyt1A also helps to overcome high levels of Cry3A resistance against C. scripta larvae [72]. Although this mechanism of action has not yet been elucidated, Cyt1A may act as a receptor of Cry3A to enhance the binding of this protein. This synergism between Cry and Cyt toxins is an excellent strategy to decrease the appearance of resistance to Cry proteins.

2.3.3. Oligomerization and Pore Formation

Although it remains unclear, some studies suggest that activated toxins need to form an oligomeric structure before insertion to the membrane as a result of binding to specific receptors [16]. In fact, Cry proteins that form oligomeric structures are related to a high pore activity [33]. Oligomerization of 3-domain Cry proteins has been described for toxins active against different insect orders, such as Cry3 proteins in coleopteran larvae. In the brush border membrane of L. decemlineata, Cry3A, Cry3B and Cry3C form an oligomer prior to membrane insertion, generating a pre-pore structure that can be inserted into the membrane [168]. Cry3Aa oligomeric structures have also been reported after incubation of Cry3Aa protoxin with T. molitor BBMV [127]. The oligomeric structure eventually leads to the lytic pore formation that disrupts the midgut insect cell by osmotic shock. However, oligomerization studies of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ia proteins incubated with lepidopteran and coleopteran BBMV, as well as culture insect cells, showed that Cry1Ia oligomerization may not be a requirement for toxicity [179]. Besides, the appearance of Cry1Ab oligomers when incubated with coleopteran BBMV could be due to an improper insertion of oligomers into the membrane or the inability to induce the post-pore events in the cells [179]. Either way, susceptible insects can withstand minor damage, but greater damage destroys the epithelium of the midgut, leading to a disruption in feeding and subsequent starvation death. Additional to the toxin action, spores may pass through the channel, to colonize and germinate in the hemolymph and contribute to insect death by septicemia [1].

3. The Secretable Coleopteran-Active Proteins

In addition to the δ-endotoxins produced during the stationary phase, other protein compounds have been found in the culture supernatant of certain entomopathogenic Bacillus isolates. These proteins, produced during the vegetative growth stage of the bacterium, were designated as vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) [180] and secreted insecticidal proteins (Sip) [181]. Within the Vip family, vip1 and vip2 genes are co-transcript in a single 4 kbp operon, which render proteins of about 100 kDa (Vip1) and 50 kDa (Vip2) [171]. The absence of toxicity of the proteins alone suggests that it is a binary toxin for some members of the coleopteran [180] and hemipteran [182] orders. In contrast, Vip3 proteins are single-chain toxins with insecticidal activity against a wide range of lepidopteran species [183]. While B. thuringiensis is a good source of Vip proteins, these proteins have also been found in other closely related bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, Lysinibacillus sphaericus, or Brevibacillus leterosporus. Currently, two Sip proteins have been described, both active against several coleopteran pests. The fact that strains harboring sip1Aa and sip1Ab genes also contain cry3 and cry8 genes, respectively, suggests that Sip1 proteins may have a role in the insecticidal mechanism against coleopteran insects [184].

3.1. Protein Structure

Vip1 and Vip2 proteins are found in the culture supernatant before cell lysis due to specific secretion [181,185]. Both proteins have an N-terminal signal peptide for secretion, commonly cleaved after the secretion process is completed [24,181]. The Vip1/Vip2 homology with other bacterial binary toxins and the fact that these proteins are codified by two genes encoded in a single operon, suggest the presence of a typical “A+B” binary toxin [24,185]. It has been proposed that Vip1, with moderate sequence identity (30%) and structural similarity with the binding C2-II Clostridium botulinum toxin and the toxin “B” of Clostridium difficile, is the binding domain that translocates Vip2, with homology to the Rho-ADP-ribosylatin exotoxin C3 of Clostridium spp, to the host cell [186,187]. As occurs with other related “B” compounds, Vip1 is formed by four domains involved in docking to enzymatic components, binding to specific cell surface receptors, oligomerization, and channel formation in lipid membranes [188]. Coleopteran active Sip1Aa protein contains a predicted Gram-positive consensus secretion signal [4] and exhibits 46% similarity with Mtx3 mosquitocidal toxin of Lysinibacillus sphaericus [184]. This homology may indicate that Sip1Aa toxicity should be caused by pore formation.

3.2. Insecticidal Activity

The activity of the Bt secretable toxins against coleopterans is depicted in Table 2. Currently, four Vip protein families have been identified, but only Vip1/Vip2 showed activity against coleopteran pests [189]. Vip1/Vip2 proteins have been tested against different coleopteran families but they have shown active only against the Chrysomelidae, Curculionidae, and Scarabeidae families, being particularly toxic to corn rootworms. Single Vip1 or Vip2 showed no mortality, confirming that these proteins must act together to be toxic [185]. Vip1Aa was highly toxic against Diabrotica spp when combined with Vip2Aa or Vip2Ab, but Vip1Ab/Vip2Ab (co-expressed in the same operon) and Vip1Ab/Vip2Aa were not active [185]. These data show the specificity of these proteins and suggest that the absence of toxicity is due to Vip1Ab. Moreover, Vip1Ba/Vip2Ba and Vip1Bb/Vip1Ba were toxic against Diabrotica virgifera virgifera [190] and binary Vip1Da/Vip1Ad had activity against the curculionid A. grandis and the chrysomelids Diabrotica spp and L. decemlineata [191]. These are the only Vip proteins active against the Colorado potato beetle. Vip1Ad/Vip2Ag binary proteins were the first report of demonstrated toxicity against any Scarabaeoidea larvae, being active against Holotrichia parallela, H. oblita and Anomala corpulenta [192]. Sip1Aa and Sip1Ab proteins have specific activity against coleopteran pests. Sip1Aa caused lethal toxicity for L. decemlineata larvae and stunting in D. virgifera and D. undecimpunctata larvae [181]. Sip1Ab was also toxic to Colaphellus bowringi Baly (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) but it did not harm Hloltrichia diomphalia (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae [184], suggesting specific chrysomelid activity, although further studies are needed to determine its host range.

3.3. Mode of Action

The mode of action of coleopteran-specific Bt secretable proteins is poorly understood, but some information is available for this binary mechanism of action. The proposed multistep process begins with the ingestion of the two toxins by the susceptible larvae. Though the two encoded proteins are synthesized together, they are thought not to get associated in solution and reach the insect midgut as single proteins [188]. Then, the proteolytic processing by the trypsin-like proteases of the insect midgut juice of Vip1 allows the cell-bound “B” to bind to a specific membrane receptor, followed by the formation of oligomers containing seven Vip1 molecules [193]. It is at this stage when the docking between Vip1 and Vip2 translocates the toxic component (Vip2) into the cytoplasm though the “B” (Vip1) channel [188]. Recent studies in BBMVs of H. parallela evidenced that although Vip2Ag showed a low degree of binding on its own, the degree of binding increased when Vip1Ad was added, showing that Vip1Ad acted as a receptor to help Vip2 bind to BBMVs [194]. Once inside the cytosol, Vip2 destroys filamentous actin by blocking its polymerization and leading to cell death [195].
Sip1 proteins have no homology with Vip proteins, but Sip1A exhibits limited sequence similarity with the 36-kDa mosquitocidal Mtx3 protein of B. sphaericus, suggesting that toxicity is related with pore formation [181].

4. Bt Based Insecticides

In 1938, the first insecticide based on B. thuringiensis was produced and marketed under the name Sporéine for the control of lepidopteran insect pests [47]. Since then, sporulated cultures of B. thuringiensis have been used widely as foliar sprays to protect crops from insect damage. Since B. thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis was discovered [48], it was rapidly formulated as a bioinsecticide and commercialized against the Colorado potato beetle. Bt-based insecticides to control coleopteran pests are mainly developed against chrysomelid beetles [198]. Novodor® (Kenogard) uses the NB-176 strain of Bt subsp. tenebrionis as the active ingredient and is widely used for the control of L. decemlineata. However, the toxicity of this commercial product has been verified for other species of beetles, such as the chrysomelids Chrysophtharta bimaculata, C. agricola and C. scripta [199,200] under laboratory conditions. Furthermore, this product has been shown to be effective against C. scripta in field conditions [200], while the use of Novodor did not exert good control of the populations of Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [201].
To date, most of the Bt-based bioinsecticide products effectively use natural Bt strains for the control of foliar-feeding pests. However, several factors have limited their use. Usually, Bt strains have a narrow insecticidal spectrum compared with other insecticides, even when insects are closely related [202]. Advances in genetic manipulation technologies offer improvements in the efficiency of Bt-based formulates and reductions in their production costs. The development of new strains by conjugation or transduction has been used to confer natural strains with new insecticidal properties [203]. The natural Bt subsp. kurstaki, for example, has been modified to express several cry3 genes and extend its host range to both lepidopteran and coleopteran pests [202]. The active ingredient in Foil® is the Bt strain EG2424, expressing both Cry1Ac and Cry3A proteins, the latter of which was transferred from a Cry3Aa-encoding plasmid belonging to the Bt subsp. morrisoni [204]. Similarly, the Cry3-overproducing strain, EG7673, was obtained by transforming a natural strain with a recombinant plasmid containing a cry3Bb1 gene. A formulation with this strain as the active ingredient was commercialized as Raven® and was four-fold more active than the parental strain [205].

5. Bt-Crops

By expressing one or more Bt toxic genes in a target plant tissue transgenic insect-resistant crops, Bt crops, can be produced. Such cultivars need no further pest control measures. To date, the Bt crops extension has increased worldwide, particularly that of Bt cotton, Bt rice and Bt corn [9]. Bt plants have been created for the control of several insect pests, among others, Colorado potato beetle (L. decemlineata) and corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp.). The first human-modified pesticide-producing crop was potato, which expressed the cry3A gene from B. thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis in their leaves [206]. The transgenic gene expression confers potato plants protection against the Colorado potato beetle and allows reducing insecticide applications [207]. A few years later, this Bt crop was complemented with another gene expression cassette that also provided protection against the Potato leafroll virus [208]. However, genetically modified potatoes were commercialized from 1995 to 2001, and eventually removed from the marketplace due to social concern for genetically modified crops [209].
A coleopteran-active Bt maize was designed for the control of corn rootworms, expressing a variant of the wild-type cry3Bb1 gene from Bt subsp. kumamotoensis in the root tissue [210]. Currently, Bt maize hybrids express four different crystal proteins (Cry3Bb, mCry3A, Cry34Ab/35Ab and eCry3.1Ab), individually or co-expressing two toxins [211,212]. Vip1 and Vip2 proteins were also candidates to be expressed in maize plants, mainly due to the great toxicity against rootworms. However, the cytotoxic activity of the Vip2 protein has prevented the development of a Bt plant expressing this binary toxins [189]. The opportunity of expressing the toxin in a specific tissue allows minimization of the exposure of non-target fauna while increasing the control of tunneling and root pests, which are otherwise difficult to manage. However, Western corn rootworm has developed field resistance to all four currently available Bt toxins [212,213,214] as did D. virgifera in 2009 against Bt corn [55]. These facts show that although Bt crops have the potential to increase productivity while conserving biodiversity, resistance management programs and a better use of integrated pest management are necessary to delay resistance development as much as possible [215].

6. Resistance and Cross-Resistance

The widespread use of B. thuringiensis biopesticides, as well as the planting of millions of hectares of Bt plants to protect crops from pests, carry the risk of selecting insect biotypes that are tolerant or resistance to Bt toxins. The appearance of resistance may be due to alterations in any step involved their mode of action, from the solubilization and activation steps to the capacity of pore formation [159]. It is established that the lack of solubilization is favored by the physicochemical conditions of the midgut fluids, particularly the pH. The acidic midgut of the coleopteran insects seemed to be a limiting factor in the solubilization of Cry proteins, such as Cry1B and Cry7Aa [52,71], although recent reports seem to indicate that more factors are involved as Cry7Aa proteins are dissolved in L. decemlineata and H. vigintioctomaculata midgut fluids [57,58]. Once the Cry toxin is solubilized in the midgut, protoxins are proteolytically cleaved to activated toxins. This toxin processing depends on the presence of the right digestive enzymes in the host midgut fluid. As an example, it was observed in D. virgifera larvae that the Cry3Aa protein was poorly processed by its own proteases, which leads to low activity of Cry3Aa against rootworms [157]. Introduction of a chymotrypsin/cathepsin recognition site in domain I of Cry3A has been shown to enhance the bioactivity of this toxin against the western corn rootworm larvae [157].
Molecularly, the insect resistance basis is a modification or loss of the specific midgut cell membrane receptors or some mediator, which eliminates or reduces the capacity of the toxin to initiate a lethal pathway [216]. Cross-resistance between Cry toxins is often associated with sequence similarities in domains II and III, related to specific protein binding [217]. Under laboratory conditions, populations of L. decemlineata and C. scripta resistant to Cry3Aa have been described [53,54]. To date, the appearance of field resistance is still relatively low despite the extensive use of products based on the same protein, which increases the probability of resistance development.
Conversely, rootworm populations have developed resistance to all proteins used in transgenic corn. The intense selection pressure posed by the continuous exposure of insects to Bt toxins has increased the emergence of pest resistance. Since the first case of resistance to Cry3Bb1 Bt-maize in 2009, Diabrotica has developed resistance to Cry3Aa and Cry34/35Ab binary protein [211]. New strategies are being carried out to try to delay resistance, including a combined use of several proteins in the same Bt plant [218]. Pyramiding of two Bt proteins can delay resistance to those proteins because when insects become tolerant to one toxin, most will still be susceptible to the other toxin [211]. However, there is already evidence of cross-resistance to Cry3 proteins and even to Cry34/35, which may invalidate, in the long run, the use of all these proteins [212].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.-A., C.A.-A. and P.C.; resources, C.A.-A., B.E., and P.C.; writing—original draft, M.D.-A.; writing and editing, M.D.-A., M.V., B.E., and P.C.; review and supervision, M.V. and P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RTI2018-095204-B-C22).

Acknowledgments

M.D.-A. received a doctoral grant from Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Raymond, B.; Johnston, P.R.; Nielsen-LeRoux, C.; Lereclus, D.; Crickmore, N. Bacillus thuringiensis: An impotent pathogen? Trends Microbiol. 2010, 18, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schnepf, E.; Crickmore, N.; Van Rie, J.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Feitelson, J.; Zeigler, D.R.; Dean, D.H. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 775–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wei, J.-Z.; Hale, K.; Carta, L.; Platzer, E.; Wong, C.; Fang, S.-C.; Aroian, R.V. Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins that target nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 2760–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Palma, L.; Muñoz, D.; Berry, C.; Murillo, J.; Caballero, P. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins: An Overview of Their Biocidal Activity. Toxins 2014, 6, 3296–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nester, E.W.; Thomashow, L.S.; Metz, M.; Gordon, M. 100 Years of Bacillus thuringiensis: A critical scientific assessment. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Portela-Dussán, D.D.; Chaparro-Giralddo, A.; López-Pazos, S.A. La biotecnología de Bacillus thuringiensis en la agricultura. Nova 2013, 11, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krishnan, V.; Domanska, B.; Elhigazi, A.; Afolabi, F.; West, M.J.; Crickmore, N. The human cancer cell active toxin Cry41Aa from Bacillus thuringiensis acts like its insecticidal counterparts. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1591–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bravo, A.; Likitvivatanavong, S.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M. Bacillus thuringiensis: A story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 41, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years; ISAAA Br. No. 53; ISAAA: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schnepf, H.E.; Whiteley, H.R. Cloning and expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78, 2893–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Crickmore, N.; Zeigler, D.R.; Feitelson, J.; Schnepf, E.; Van Rie, J.; Lereclus, D.; Baum, J.; Dean, D.H. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Crickmore, N.; Baum, J.A.; Bravo, A.; Lereclus, D.; Narva, K.E.; Sampson, K.; Schnepf, H.E.; Sun, M.; Zeigler, D.R. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Nomenclature. Available online: http://www.btnomenclature.info/ (accessed on 30 May 2020).
  13. Bravo, A.; Soberón, M.; Gill, S.S. Bacillus thuringiensis: Mechanisms and Use. In Insect Control: Biological and Synthetic Agents; Gilbert, L.I., Gill, S.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 175–205. [Google Scholar]
  14. Berry, C.; Crickmore, N. Structural classification of insecticidal proteins—Towards an in silico characterisation of novel toxins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 142, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. de Maagd, R.A.; Bravo, A.; Crickmore, N. How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pardo-López, L.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: Mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Oppert, B.; Ellis, R.T.; Babcock, J. Effects of Cry1F and Cry34Ab1/35Ab1 on storage pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2010, 46, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Gao, M. Construction of an environmental safe Bacillus thuringiensis engineered strain against Coleoptera. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 4027–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jolivet, P. Food Habits and Food Selection of Chrysomelidae. Bionomic and Evolutionary Perspectives. In Biology of Chrysomelidae; Jolivet, P., Petitpierre, E., Hsiao, T.H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  20. Soberón, M.; López-Díaz, J.A.; Bravo, A. Cyt toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis: A protein fold conserved in several pathogenic microorganisms. Peptides 2013, 41, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bietlot, H.P.; Vishnubhatla, I.; Carey, P.R.; Pozsgay, M.; Kaplan, H. Characterization of the cysteine residues and disulphide linkages in the protein crystal of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem. J. 1990, 267, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Agaisse, H.; Lereclus, D. How does Bacillus thuringiensis produce so much insecticidal crystal protein? J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 6027–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Berry, C.; Ben-dov, E.; Jones, A.F.; Murphy, L.; Quail, M.A.; Holden, M.T.G.; Harris, D.; Zaritsky, A.; Parkhill, J. Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the Toxin-Coding Plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5082–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. de Maagd, R.A.; Bravo, A.; Berry, C.; Crickmore, N.; Schnepf, H.E. Structure, diversity, and evolution of protein toxins from spore-forming entomopathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2003, 37, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.D.; Carroll, J.; Ellar, D.J. Crystal structure of insecticidal d-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 A resolution. Nature 1991, 353, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Grochulski, P.; Masson, L.; Borisova, S.; Pusztai-Carey, M.; Schwartz, J.-L.; Brousseau, R.; Cygler, M. Bacillus thuringiensis CrylA(a) Insecticidal Toxin: Crystal structure and channel formation. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 254, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Morse, R.J.; Yamamoto, T.; Stroud, R.M. Structure of Cry2Aa Suggests an Unexpected Receptor Binding Epitope. Structure 2001, 9, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Galitsky, N.; Cody, V.; Wojtczak, A.; Ghosh, D.; Luft, J.R.; Pangborn, W.; English, L. Structure of the insecticidal bacterial δ-endotoxin Cry3Bb1 of Bacillus thuringiensis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2001, 57, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Boonserm, P.; Davis, P.; Ellar, D.J.; Li, J. Crystal structure of the mosquito-larvicidal toxin Cry4Ba and its biological implications. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 348, 363–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Boonserm, P.; Mo, M.; Angsuthanasombat, C.; Lescar, J. Structure of the functional form of the mosquito larvicidal Cry4Aa toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.8-Angstrom resolution. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3391–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Guo, S.; Ye, S.; Liu, Y.; Wei, L.; Xue, J.; Wu, H.; Song, F.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Huang, D.; et al. Crystal structure of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Ea1: An insecticidal toxin toxic to underground pests, the larvae of Holotrichia parallela. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 168, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ye, Y.; Godzik, A. FATCAT: A web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W582–W585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bravo, A.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 2007, 49, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xu, C.; Wang, B.-C.; Yu, Z.; Sun, M. Structural Insights into Bacillus thuringiensis Cry, Cyt and Parasporin Toxins. Toxins 2014, 6, 2732–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yamaguchi, T.; Sahara, K.; Bando, H.; Asano, S. Discovery of a novel Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8D protein and the unique toxicity of the Cry8D-class proteins against scarab beetles. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 99, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bokori-Brown, M.; Savva, C.G.; Fernandes Da Costa, S.P.; Naylor, C.E.; Basak, A.K.; Titball, R.W. Molecular basis of toxicity of Clostridium perfringens epsilon toxin. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 4589–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Donovan, W.P.; Donovan, J.C.; Slaney, A.C. Bacillus thuringiensis CryET33 and CryET34 Compositions and Uses Therefor. U.S. Patent 6,063,756 A, 16 May 2000. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rydel, T.; Sharamitaro, J.; Brown, G.R.; Gouzov, V.; Seale, J.; Sturman, E.; Thoma, R.; Gruys, K.; Isaac, B. The crystal structure of a coleopteran insect-active binary Bt protein toxin complex at 2.5 Å resolution. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Crystallographic Association, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 21–26 July 2001. [Google Scholar]
  39. Baum, J.A.; Chu, C.R.; Rupar, M.; Brown, G.R.; Donovan, W.P.; Huesing, J.E.; Ilagan, O.; Malvar, T.M.; Pleau, M.; Walters, M.; et al. Binary toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis active against the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4889–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ellis, R.T.; Stockhoff, B.A.; Stamp, L.; Schnepf, H.E.; Schwab, G.E.; Knuth, M.; Russell, J.; Cardineau, G.A.; Narva, K.E. Novel Bacillus thuringiensis binary insecticidal Crystal proteins active on Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kelker, M.S.; Berry, C.; Evans, S.L.; Pai, R.; McCaskill, D.G.; Wang, N.X.; Russell, J.C.; Baker, M.D.; Yang, C.; Pflugrath, J.W.; et al. Structural and Biophysical Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins Cry34Ab1 and Cry35Ab1. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cohen, S.; Albeck, S.; Ben-Dov, E.; Cahan, R.; Firer, M.; Zaritsky, A.; Dym, O. Cyt1Aa Toxin: Crystal structure reveals implications for Its membrane-perforating function. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 413, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, J.; Koni, P.A.; Ellar, D.J. Structure of the mosquitocidal δ-endotoxin CytB from Bacillus thuringiensis sp. kyushuensisand implications for membrane pore formation. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 257, 129–152. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cohen, S.; Dym, O.; Albeck, S.; Ben-Dov, E.; Cahan, R.; Firer, M.; Zaritsky, A. High-Resolution crystal structure of activated Cyt2Ba monomer from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 380, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gazit, E.; Burshtein, N.; Ellar, D.J.; Sawyer, T.; Shai, Y. Bacillus thuringiensis Cytolytic toxin associates specifically with Its synthetic Helices A and C in the membrane Bound State. Implications for the assembly of oligomeric transmembrane pores. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 15546–15554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Promdonkoy, B.; Rungrod, A.; Promdonkoy, P.; Pathaichindachote, W.; Krittanai, C.; Panyim, S. Amino acid substitutions in αA and αC of Cyt2Aa2 alter hemolytic activity and mosquito-larvicidal specificity. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 133, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Federici, B.A.; Park, H.-W.; Sakano, Y. Insecticidal Protein Crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis. In Inclusions in Prokaryotes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 195–236. [Google Scholar]
  48. Krieg, A.; Huger, A.M.; Langenbruch, G.A.; Schnetter, W. Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis: Ein neuer, gegenüber Larven von Coleopteren wirksamer Pathotyp. Zeitschrift für Angew. Entomol. 2009, 96, 500–508. [Google Scholar]
  49. Herrnstadt, C.; Soares, G.G.; Wilcox, E.R.; Edwards, D.L. A new strain of Bacillus thuringiensis with activity against coleopteran insects. Nat. Biotechnol. 1986, 4, 305–308. [Google Scholar]
  50. Barjac, H.; Frachon, E. Classification of Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Entomophaga 1990, 35, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rupar, M.J.; Donovan, W.P.; Groat, R.G.; Slaney, A.C.; Mattison, J.W.; Johnson, T.B.; Charles, J.F.; Dumanoir, V.C.; de Barjac, H. Two novel strains of Bacillus thuringiensis toxic to coleopterans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 3337–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lambert, B.; Höfte, H.; Annys, K.; Jansens, S.; Soetaert, P.; Peferoen, M. Novel Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein with a silent activity against coleopteran larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 2536–2542. [Google Scholar]
  53. Whalon, M.E.; Miller, D.L.; Hollingworth, R.M.; Grafius, E.J.; Miller, J.R. Selection of a Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Strain Resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Econ. Entomol. 1993, 86, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bauer, L.S. Resistance: A threat to the insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Florida Entomol. 1995, 78, 414–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gassmann, A.J.; Petzold-Maxwell, J.L.; Keweshan, R.S.; Dunbar, M.W. Field-Evolved Resistance to Bt Maize by Western Corn Rootworm. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ekobu, M.; Solera, M.; Kyamanywa, S.; Mwanga, R.O.M.; Odongo, B.; Ghislain, M.; Moar, W.J. Toxicity of seven Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins against Cylas puncticollis and Cylas brunneus (Coleoptera: Brentidae) using a novel artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Villanueva, M.; Fernandez, A.B.; Caballero, P. A strain of Bacillus thuringiensis containing a novel cry7Aa2 gene that Is toxic to Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Insects 2019, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Song, P.; Wang, Q.; Nangong, Z.; Su, J.; Ge, D. Identification of Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) midgut putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal Cry7Ab3 toxin. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 109, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shu, C.; Yu, H.; Wang, R.; Fen, S.; Su, X.; Huang, D.; Zhang, J.; Song, F. Characterization of Two Novel cry8 genes from Bacillus thuringiensis Strain BT185. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shu, C.; Yan, G.; Wang, R.; Zhang, J.; Feng, S.; Huang, D.; Song, F. Characterization of a novel cry8 gene specific to Melolonthidae pests: Holotrichia oblita and Holotrichia parallela. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gindin, G.; Mendel, Z.; Levitin, B.; Kumar, P.; Levi, T.; Shahi, P.; Khasdan, V.; Weinthal, D.; Kuznetsova, T.; Einav, M.; et al. The basis for rootstock resilient to Capnodis species: Screening for genes encoding δ-endotoxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Park, Y.; Hua, G.; Taylor, M.D.; Adang, M.J. A coleopteran cadherin fragment synergizes toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry3Aa, Cry3Bb, and Cry8Ca against lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 123, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Oliveira, G.R.; Silva, M.C.; Lucena, W.A.; Nakasu, E.Y.; Firmino, A.A.; Beneventi, M.A.; Souza, D.S.; Gomes, J.E.; de Souza, J.D.; Rigden, D.J.; et al. Improving Cry8Ka toxin activity towards the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yu, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, D.; Gao, J.; Song, F. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis strain Bt185 toxic to the Asian Cockchafer: Holotrichia parallela. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 53, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, H.; Liu, R.; Shu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, S.; Shao, G.; Zhang, X.; Gao, J. Characterization of one novel cry8 gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain Q52-7. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 3075–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Thomson, M.; Knuth, M.; Cardineau, G. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins with Improved Activity. U.S. Patent 5,874,288 A, 23 February 1999. [Google Scholar]
  67. Shrestha, G.; Reddy, G.V.P.; Jaronski, S.T. Field efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis galleriae strain SDS-502 for the management of alfalfa weevil and its impact on Bathyplectes spp. parasitization rate. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2018, 153, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Isaac, B.; Krieger, E.K.; Mettus, A.-M.L.; Moshiri, F.; Sivasupramanian, S. Polypeptide Compositions Toxic to Anthonomus Insects and Methods of Use. U.S. Patent 6,541,448 B2, 1 August 2002. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mettus, A.-M.L.; Baum, J.A. Polypeptide Compositions Toxic to Diabrotica Insects, Obteined from Bt; CryET70, and Methods of Use. Eur. Patent Application EP 1 129 198 B1, 11 May 2000. 29 September 1999. [Google Scholar]
  70. van Frankenhuyzen, K. Cross-order and cross-phylum activity of Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal proteins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013, 114, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bradley, D.; Harkey, M.A.; Kim, M.K.; Biever, K.D.; Bauer, L. The insecticidal CryIB Crystal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. thuringiensis has dual specificity to Coleopteran and Lepidopteran larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1995, 65, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Federici, B.A.; Bauer, L.S. Cyt1Aa protein of Bacillus thuringiensis Is toxic to the Cottonwood Leaf Beetle, Chrysomela scripta, and suppresses high levels of resistance to Cry3Aa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4368–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Naimov, S.; Weemen-Hendriks, M.; Dukiandjiev, S.; de Maagd, R. Bacillus thuringiensis Delta-Endotoxin Cry1 Hybrid Proteins with Increased Activity against the Colorado Potato Beetle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 5328–5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Martins, É.S.; Monnerat, R.G.; Queiroz, P.R.; Dumas, V.F.; Braz, S.V.; de Souza Aguiar, R.W.; Gomes, A.C.M.M.; Sánchez, J.; Bravo, A.; Ribeiro, B.M. Midgut GPI-anchored proteins with alkaline phosphatase activity from the cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis) are putative receptors for the Cry1B protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rodríguez-González, Á.; Porteous-Álvarez, A.J.; Del Val, M.; Casquero, P.A.; Escriche, B. Toxicity of five Cry proteins against the insect pest Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrisomelidae: Bruchinae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Martins, É.S.; Praça, L.B.; Dumas, V.F.; Silva-Werneck, J.O.; Sone, E.H.; Waga, I.C.; Berry, C.; Monnerat, R.G. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates toxic to cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). Biol. Control 2007, 40, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Asano, S. Identification of cry gene from Bacillus thuringiensis by PCR and isolation of unique insecticidal bacteria. Mem. Fac. Agric. 1996, 19, 529–563. [Google Scholar]
  78. de Souza Aguiar, R.W.; Martins, É.S.; Ribeiro, B.M.; Monnerat, R.G. Cry10Aa Protein is highly toxic to Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an important insect pest in brazilian cotton crop fields. Bt Res. 2012, 3, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  79. Baum, J.A.; Sukuru, U.R.; Penn, S.R.; Meyer, S.E.; Subbarao, S.; Shi, X.; Flasinski, S.; Heck, G.R.; Brown, R.S.; Clark, T.L. Cotton Plants Expressing a Hemipteran-Active Bacillus thuringiensis Crystal Protein Impact the Development and Survival of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) Nymphs. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bradfisch, G.A.; Muller-Cohn, J.; Narva, K.E.; Fu, J.; Thomson, M. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and Genes for Controlling Coleopteran Pests. U.S. Patent 6,710,027 B2, 23 March 2004. [Google Scholar]
  81. Schnepf, H.E.; Lee, S.; Dojillo, J.; Burmeister, P.; Fencil, K.; Morera, L.; Nygaard, L.; Narva, K.E.; Wolt, J.D. Characterization of Cry34/Cry35 Binary Insecticidal Proteins from Diverse Bacillus thuringiensis Strain Collections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Moellenbeck, D.J.; Peters, M.L.; Bing, J.W.; Rouse, J.R.; Higgins, L.S.; Sims, L.; Nevshemal, T.; Marshall, L.; Ellis, R.T.; Bystrak, P.G.; et al. Insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis protect corn from corn rootworms. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 668–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Rupar, M.J.; Donovan, W.P.; Tan, Y.; Slaney, A.C. Bacillus thuringiensis CryET29 Compositions Toxic to Coleopteran Insects and Ctenocephalides spp. U.S. Patent 6,093,695, 25 July 2000. [Google Scholar]
  84. Weathersbee, A.A.; Lapointe, S.L.; Shatters, R.G. Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates against Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Florida Entomol. 2006, 89, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mahmoud, S.B.; Ramos, J.E.; Shatters, R.G.; Hall, D.G.; Lapointe, S.L.; Niedz, R.P.; Rougé, P.; Cave, R.D.; Borovsky, D. Expression of Bacillus thuringiensis cytolytic toxin (Cyt2Ca1) in citrus roots to control Diaprepes abbreviatus larvae. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 2017, 136, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. D’Amico, V.; Podgwaite, J.D.; Duke, S. Biological activity of Bacillus thuringiensis and associated toxins against the Asian Longhorned Beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 2004, 39, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chen, J.; Dai, L.-Y.; Wang, X.-P.; Tian, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-Z. The cry3Aa gene of Bacillus thuringiensis Bt886 encodes a toxin against long-horned beetles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Peña, G.; Miranda-Rios, J.; de la Riva, G.; Pardo-López, L.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A. A Bacillus thuringiensis S-Layer Protein Involved in Toxicity against Epilachna varivestis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 127, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Elgizawy, K.K.; Ashry, N.M. Efficiency of Bacillus thuringiensis strains and their Cry proteins against the Red Flour Beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2019, 29, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. MacIntosh, S.C.; Stone, T.B.; Sims, S.R.; Hunst, P.L.; Greenplate, J.T.; Marrone, P.G.; Perlak, F.J.; Fischhoff, D.A.; Fuchs, R.L. Specificity and efficacy of purified Bacillus thuringiensis proteins against agronomically important insects. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1990, 56, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Porcar, M.; García-Robles, I.; Domínguez-Escribà, L.; Latorre, A. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab and Cry3Aa endotoxins on predatory Coleoptera tested through artificial diet-incorporation bioassays. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2010, 100, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chang, X.; Lu, Z.; Shen, Z.; Peng, Y.; Ye, G. Bitrophic and Tritrophic Effects of Transgenic cry1Ab/cry2Aj Maize on the Beneficial, Nontarget Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ. Entomol. 2017, 46, 1171–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sims, S.R. Host activity spectrum of the CryIIA Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki protein. Effects on Lepidoptera, Diptera, and non-target arthropods. Southwest. Entomol. 1997, 22, 395–404. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sharma, A.; Kumar, S.; Bhatnagar, R.K. Bacillus thuringiensis Protein Cry6B (BGSC ID 4D8) is Toxic to Larvae of Hypera postica. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Niu, L.; Tian, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhou, H.; Ma, W.; Lei, C.; Chen, L. Transgenic Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab or Cry1Ac/EPSPS does not affect the plant bug Adelphocoris suturalis or the pollinating beetle Haptoncus luteolus. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 788–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Contreras, E.; Rausell, C.; Real, M.D. Proteome response of Tribolium castaneum larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin producing strains. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Luo, J.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Lv, L.-M.; Wang, X.-P.; Cui, J.-J.; Lei, C.-L. Bt proteins Cry1Ah and Cry2Ab do not affect cotton aphid Aphis gossypii and ladybeetle Propylea japonica. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zhong, C.; Ellar, D.J.; Bishop, A.; Johnson, C.; Lin, S.; Hart, E.R. Characterization of a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-Endotoxin which ia toxic to insects in three orders. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2000, 76, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gómez, J.E.C.; López-Pazos, S.A.; Cerón, J. Determination of Cry toxin activity and identification of an aminopeptidase N receptor-like gene in Asymmathetes vulcanorum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 111, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. López-Pazos, S.A.; Rojas Arias, A.C.; Ospina, S.A.; Cerón, J. Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis hybrid protein against a lepidopteran and a coleopteran pest. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 302, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Shin, B.S.; Park, S.H.; Choi, S.K.; Koo, B.T.; Lee, S.T.; Kim, J.I. Distribution of cryV-type insecticidal protein genes in Bacillus thuringiensis and cloning of cryV-type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. entomocidus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2402–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Choi, S.-K.; Shin, B.-S.; Kong, E.-M.; Rho, H.M.; Park, S.-H. Cloning of a new Bacillus thuringiensis cry1I -Type crystal protein gene. Curr. Microbiol. 2000, 41, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kostichka, K.; Warren, G.W.; Mullins, M.; Mullins, A.D.; Palekar, N.V.; Craig, J.A.; Koziel, M.G.; Estruch, J.J. Cloning of a cryV-type insecticidal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis: The cryV-encoded protein is expressed early in stationary phase. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 2141–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Ruiz de Escudero, I.; Estela, A.; Porcar, M.; Martínez, C.; Oguiza, J.A.; Escriche, B.; Ferrè, J.; Caballero, P. Molecular and Insecticidal Characterization of a Cry1I Protein Toxic to Insects of the Families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Plutellidae, and Chrysomelidae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 4796–4804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Grossi-De-Sa, M.F.; De Magalhaes, M.Q.; Silva, M.S.; Silva, S.M.B.; Dias, S.C.; Nakasu, E.Y.T.; Brunetta, P.S.F.; Oliveira, G.R.; De Oliveira Neto, O.B.; De Oliveira, R.S.; et al. Susceptibility of Anthonomus grandis (Cotton Boll Weevil) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Fall Armyworm) to a Cry1Ia-type toxin from a Brazilian Bacillus thuringiensis strain. BMB Rep. 2007, 40, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Gleave, A.P.; Williams, R.; Hedges, R.J. Screening by polymerase chain reaction of Bacillus thuringiensis serotypes for the presence of cryV-like insecticidal protein genes and characterization of a cryV gene cloned from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 1683–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Mushtaq, R.; Behle, R.; Liu, R.; Niu, L.; Song, P.; Shakoori, A.R.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.L. Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ie2, Cry2Ac7, Vip3Aa11 and Cry7Ab3 proteins against Anticarsia gemmatalis, Chrysodeixis includens and Ceratoma trifurcata. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 150, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, J.; Song, F.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.; He, K.; Tan, J.; Huang, D. Identification of vip3A-type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains and characterization of a novel vip3A-type gene. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. von Tersch, M.A.; Gonzalez, J.M. Bacillus thuringiensis cryET1 Toxin Gene and Protein Toxic to Lepidopteran Insects. U.S. Patent 5,356,623 A, 18 October 1994. [Google Scholar]
  110. Oppert, B.; Morgan, T.D.; Kramer, K.J. Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa protoxin and protease inhibitors against coleopteran storage pests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhongkamg, W.; He, W.; Peng, G.; Xia, Y. Transformation and expression of specific insecticide gene Bt cry3A in resident endogenetic bacteria isolated from Apriona germari (Hope) larvae intestines. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2008, 48, 1168–1174. [Google Scholar]
  112. Kurt, A.; Özkan, M.; Sezen, K.; Demirbaǧ, Z.; Özcengiz, G. Cry3Aa11: A new Cry3Aa δ-endotoxin from a local isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Su, Z.; Deng, L.; Yi, X.; Xiao, S.; Zhang, C. The toxicity of Cry3Aa protein in Brontispa longissima by prokaryatic expression. Genomics Appl. Biol. 2009, 28, 691–694. [Google Scholar]
  114. Génissel, A.; Leplé, J.C.; Millet, N.; Augustin, S.; Jouanin, L.; Pilate, G. High tolerance against Chrysomela tremulae of transgenic poplar plants expressing a synthetic cry3Aa gene from Bacillus thuringiensis ssp tenebrionis. Mol. Breed. 2003, 11, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. James, R.R.; Croft, B.A.; Strauss, S.H. Susceptibility of the Cottonwood Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Different Strains and Transgenic Toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yan, G.; Song, F.; Shu, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Huang, D.; Feng, S.; Zhang, J. An engineered Bacillus thuringiensis strain with insecticidal activity against Scarabaeidae (Anomala corpulenta) and Chrysomelidae (Leptinotarsa decemlineata and Colaphellus bowringi). Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Gao, Y.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.L.; Oppert, B.; Fabrick, J.A.; Liu, C.; Gao, J.; Lei, Z. Increased toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa against Crioceris quatuordecimpunctata, Phaedon brassicae and Colaphellus bowringi by a Tenebrio molitor cadherin fragment. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Park, Y.; Abdullah, M.A.F.; Taylor, M.D.; Rahman, K.; Adang, M.J. Enhancement of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa and Cry3Bb Toxicities to Coleopteran Larvae by a Toxin-Binding Fragment of an Insect Cadherin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 3086–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Li, H.; Olson, M.; Lin, G.; Hey, T.; Tan, S.Y.; Narva, K.E. Bacillus thuringiensis Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 interactions with Western Corn Rootworm Midgut Membrane Binding Sites. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Carroll, J.S.; Li, J.; Ellar, D.J. Proteolytic processing of a coleopteran-specific delta-endotoxin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis. Biochem. J. 1989, 261, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; Song, F.; Wu, J.; Feng, S.; Huang, D. Engineered Bacillus thuringiensis GO33A with broad insecticidal activity against lepidopteran and coleopteran pests. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Mahadeva Swamy, H.M.; Asokan, R.; Thimmegowda, G.G.; Mahmood, R. Expression of cry3A gene and its toxicity against Asian Gray Weevil Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 664–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gomez, S.; Mateus, A.C.; Hernandez, J.; Zimmermann, B.H. Recombinant Cry3Aa has insecticidal activity against the Andean potato weevil, Premnotrypes vorax. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 279, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Johnson, T.M.; Rishi, A.S.; Nayak, P.; Sen, S.K. Cloning of a cryIIIA endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis and its transient expression inindica rice. J. Biosci. 1996, 21, 673–685. [Google Scholar]
  125. Adang, M.J. Enhancement of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry Toxicities to Lesser Mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus. U.S. Patent 0,201,549 A1, 18 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  126. Wu, S.-J.; Dean, D.H. Functional Significance of Loops in The Receptor Binding Domain of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA δ-Endotoxin. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 255, 628–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Fabrick, J.; Oppert, C.; Lorenzen, M.D.; Morris, K.; Oppert, B.; Jurat-Fuentes, J.L. A Novel Tenebrio molitor Cadherin Is a functional receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 18401–18410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Donovan, W.P.; Rupar, M.J.; Slaney, A.C.; Malvar, T.; Gawron-Burke, M.C.; Johnson, T.B. Characterization of two genes encoding Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins toxic to Coleoptera species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 3921–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Adang, M.J.; Adang, M.J.; Abdullah, M.A.F. Enhancement of Bacilus thuringiensis Cry Protein Toxicities to Coleopterans, and Novel Insect Cadhetin Fragments. U.S. Patent 8,486,887 B2, 16 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
  130. Lambert, B.; Theunis, W.; Aguda, R.; Van Audenhove, K.; Decock, C.; Jansens, S.; Seurinck, J.; Peferoen, M. Nucleotide sequence of gene crylllD encoding a novel coleopteran-active crystal protein from strain BTII09P of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstaki Gene 1992, 110, 131–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Haffani, Y.Z.; Cloutier, C.; Belzile, F.J. Bacillus thuringiensis cry3Ca1 protein is toxic to the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Deng, S.; Shu, C.; Lin, Y.; Song, F.; Zhang, J. Identification, cloning and expression for novel cry7Ab gene and its insecticidal activity. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2009, 17, 908–913. [Google Scholar]
  133. Wang, L.; Guo, W.; Tan, J.; Sun, W.; Liu, T.; Sun, Y. Construction of an engineering strain expressing cry7Ab7 gene cloned from Bacillus thuringiensis. Front. Agric. China 2010, 4, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Foncerrada, L.; Sick, A.J.; Payne, J.M. Novel Coleopteran-Active Bacillus thuringiensis Isolate and a Novel Gene Encoding a Coleopteran-Active Toxin. Patent Application EP0498537 A2, 16 January 1992. pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  135. Michaels, T.E.; Narva, K.E.; Foncerrada, L. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins Active against Scarab Pests. U.S. Patent 5,554,534 A, 10 September 1996. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Tan, J.; Li, C.; Cheng, L. Cloning and characterization of a novel cry8Ab1 gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain B-JJX with specific toxicity to scarabaeid (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Michaels, T.E.; Foncerrada, L.; Narva, K.E. Process for Controlling Scarab Pests with Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates. International Patent Application WO 93/15206, 5 August 1993. [Google Scholar]
  138. Abad, A.; Duck, N.B.; Feng, X.; Flannagan, R.D.; Kahn, T.W.; Sims, L.E. Genes encoding Novel Proteins with Pesticidal Activity against Coleopterans. International Patent Application WO 02/034774 A2, 2 May 2002. [Google Scholar]
  139. Liu, J.; Yan, G.; Shu, C.; Zhao, C.; Liu, C.; Song, F.; Zhou, L.; Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, D. Construction of a Bacillus thuringiensis engineered strain with high toxicity and broad pesticidal spectrum against coleopteran insects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jia, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Q.; Shu, C.; Feng, X.; Song, F.; Zhang, J. A genetically modified broad-spectrum strain of Bacillus thuringiensis toxic against Holotrichia parallela, Anomala corpulenta and Holotrichia oblita. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Sato, R.; Takeuchi, K.; Ogiwara, K.; Minami, M.; Kaji, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Hori, H.; Asano, S.; Ohba, M.; Iwahana, H. Cloning, heterologous expression, and localization of a novel crystal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis serovar japonensis strain Buibui toxic to scarabaeid insects. Curr. Microbiol. 1994, 28, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Huang, D.-F.; Zhang, J.; Song, F.-P.; Lang, Z.-H. Microbial control and biotechnology research on Bacillus thuringiensis in China. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 95, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Asano, S.; Yamashita, C.; Iizuka, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Yamanaka, S.; Cerf, D.; Yamamoto, T. A strain of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. galleriae containing a novel cry8 gene highly toxic to Anomala cuprea (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biol. Control 2003, 28, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Liu, X.; Cheng, L.; Li, T.; Li, C.; Li, G. Cloning, expression and insecticidal activity of cry8Ea2 gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain B. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2008, 23, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  145. Singaravelu, B.; Crickmore, N.; Srikanth, J.; Hari, K.; Sankaranarayanan, C. Prospecting for Scarabid Specific Bacillus thuringiensis Crystal toxin cry8 gene in sugarcane ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India. J. Sugarcane Res. 2013, 3, 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  146. Silva-Werneck, J.O.; Ellar, D.J. Characterization of a novel Cry9Bb δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 98, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Brown, K.L.; Whiteley, H.R. Molecular characterization of two novel crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thompsoni. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Zhang, J.; Hodgman, T.C.; Krieger, L.; Schnetter, W.; Schairer, H.U. Cloning and analysis of the first cry gene from Bacillus popilliae. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 4336–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Guzov, V.M.; Malvar, T.M.; Roberts, J.K.; Sivasupramanian, S. Insect Inhibitory Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins, Fusions, and Methods of Use Therefor. U.S. Patent 7,655,838 B2, 2 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
  150. Herman, R.A.; Scherer, P.N.; Young, D.L.; Mihaliak, C.A.; Woodsworth, A.T.; Stockhoff, B.A.; Narva, K.E. Binary Insecticidal Crystal Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis, Strain PS149B1: Effects of Individual Protein Components and Mixtures in Laboratory Bioassays. J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rupar, M.J.; Donovan, W.P.; Chu, C.R.; Pease, E.; Tan, Y.; Slaney, A.C.; Malvar, T.M.; Baum, J. Coleopteran Toxin Polypeptide Compositions and Insect-Resistant Transgenic Plants. U.S. Patent 090,094,714 A1, 9 April 2009. [Google Scholar]
  152. Yokoyama, T.; Tanaka, M.; Hasegawa, M. Novel cry gene from Paenibacillus lentimorbus strain Semadara inhibits ingestion and promotes insecticidal activity in Anomala cuprea larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2004, 85, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. de Maagd, R.A.; Kwa, M.S.; van der Klei, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Schipper, B.; Vlak, J.M.; Stiekema, W.J.; Bosch, D. Domain III substitution in Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin CryIA(b) results in superior toxicity for Spodoptera exigua and altered membrane protein recognition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1537–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Shadenkov, A.A.; Kadyrov, R.M.; Uzbekova, S.V.; Kuz’min, E.V.; Osterman, A.L.; Chestukhina, G.G.; Shemiakin, M.F. Creation of a hybrid protein gene based on Bacillus thuringiensis delta endotoxins CryIIIA and CrIA(a) and expression of its derivatives in Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. 1993, 27, 952–959. [Google Scholar]
  155. Walters, F.S.; DeFontes, C.M.; Hart, H.; Warren, G.W.; Chen, J.S. Lepidopteran-Active Variable-Region Sequence Imparts Coleopteran Activity in eCry3.1Ab, an Engineered Bacillus thuringiensis Hybrid Insecticidal Protein. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3082–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. English, L.; Brussock, M.; Malvar, T.M.; Bryson, J.; Kulesza, C.; Walters, F.S.; Slatin, S.; von Tersch, M.A.; Romano, C. Nucleic Acid Segments Encoding Modified Bacillus thuringiensis Coleopteran-Toxic Crystal Proteins. U.S. Patent 6,060,594, 9 May 2000. [Google Scholar]
  157. Walters, F.S.; Stacy, C.M.; Lee, M.K.; Palekar, N.; Chen, J.S. An engineered Chymotrypsin/Cathepsin G site in Domain I renders Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A active against Western Corn Rootworm larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Jouzani, G.S.; Valijanian, E.; Sharafi, R. Bacillus thuringiensis: A successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 2691–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jurat-Fuentes, J.L.; Crickmore, N. Specificity determinants for Cry insecticidal proteins: Insights from their mode of action. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 142, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Guo, S.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Song, F.; Zhang, J. The role of DNA binding with the Cry8Ea1 toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 317, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Xia, L.; Sun, Y.; Ding, X.; Fu, Z.; Mo, X.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Z. Identification of cry-Type Genes on 20-kb DNA Associated with Cry1 Crystal Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Curr. Microbiol. 2005, 51, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wu, F.; Zhao, X.; Sun, Y.; Li, W.; Xia, L.; Ding, X.; Yin, J.; Hu, S.; Yu, Z.; Tang, Y. Construction of gene library of 20 kb DNAs from parasporal Crystal in Bacillus thuringiensis strain 4.0718: Phylogenetic analysis and molecular docking. Curr. Microbiol. 2012, 64, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ai, B.; Li, J.; Feng, D.; Li, F.; Guo, S. The Elimination of DNA from the Cry Toxin-DNA Complex Is a Necessary Step in the Mode of Action of the Cry8 Toxin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Koller, C.N.; Bauer, L.S.; Hollingworth, R.M. Characterization of the pH-mediated solubility of Bacillus thuringiensis var. san diego native δ-endotoxin crystals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 184, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chougule, N.P.; Doyle, E.; Fitches, E.; Gatehouse, J.A. Biochemical characterization of midgut digestive proteases from Mamestra brassicae (cabbage moth; Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and effect of soybean Kunitz inhibitor (SKTI) in feeding assays. J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Michaud, D.; Bernier-Vadnais, N.; Overney, S.; Yelle, S. Constitutive expression of digestive cysteine proteinase forms during development of the colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 25, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yamaguchi, T.; Sahara, K.; Bando, H.; Asano, S. Intramolecular proteolytic nicking and binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Da toxin in BBMVs of Japanese beetle. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010, 105, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rausell, C.; García-Robles, I.; Sánchez, J.; Muñoz-Garay, C.; Martínez-Ramírez, A.C.; Real, M.D.; Bravo, A. Role of toxin activation on binding and pore formation activity of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3 toxins in membranes of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2004, 1660, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Hernández-Martínez, P.; Vera-Velasco, N.M.; Martínez-Solís, M.; Ghislain, M.; Ferré, J.; Escriche, B. Shared binding sites for the Bacillus thuringiensis proteins Cry3Bb, Cry3Ca, and Cry7Aa in the African Sweet Potato Pest Cylas puncticollis (Brentidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 7545–7550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Ochoa-Campuzano, C.; Real, M.D.; Martínez-Ramírez, A.C.; Bravo, A.; Rausell, C. An ADAM metalloprotease is a Cry3Aa Bacillus thuringiensis toxin receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 362, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zúñiga-Navarrete, F.; Gómez, I.; Peña, G.; Bravo, A.; Soberón, M. A Tenebrio molitor GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatase is involved in binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa to brush border membrane vesicles. Peptides 2013, 41, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Siegfried, B.D.; Waterfield, N.; Ffrench-Constant, R.H. Expressed sequence tags from Diabrotica virgifera virgifera midgut identify a coleopteran cadherin and a diversity of cathepsins. Insect Mol. Biol. 2005, 14, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sayed, A.; Nekl, E.R.; Siqueira, H.A.A.; Wang, H.-C.; Ffrench-Constant, R.H.; Bagley, M.; Siegfried, B.D. A novel cadherin-like gene from western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), larval midgut tissue. Insect Mol. Biol. 2007, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Contreras, E.; Schoppmeier, M.; Real, M.D.; Rausell, C. Sodium Solute Symporter and Cadherin proteins Act as Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Ba toxin functional receptors in Tribolium castaneum. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 18013–18021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Shu, C.; Tan, S.; Yin, J.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A.; Liu, C.; Geng, L.; Song, F.; Li, K.; Zhang, J. Assembling of Holotrichia parallela (dark black chafer) midgut tissue transcriptome and identification of midgut proteins that bind to Cry8Ea toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7209–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Jiang, J.; Huang, Y.; Shu, C.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A.; Liu, C.; Song, F.; Lai, J.; Zhang, J. Holotrichia oblita Midgut Proteins That Bind to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8-Like Toxin and Assembly of the H. oblita Midgut Tissue Transcriptome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Yamaguchi, T.; Bando, H.; Asano, S. Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Da toxin-binding glucosidase from the adult Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013, 113, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Pérez, C.; Muñoz-Garay, C.; Portugal, L.C.; Sánchez, J.; Gill, S.S.; Soberón, M.; Bravo, A. Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis Cyt1Aa enhances activity of Cry11Aa toxin by facilitating the formation of a pre-pore oligomeric structure. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2931–2937. [Google Scholar]
  179. Khorramnejad, A.; Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Caballero, P.; Escriche, B.; Bel, Y. Study of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia protein oligomerization promoted by midgut Brush Border Membrane Vesicles of lepidopteran and coleopteran insects, or cultured insect cells. Toxins 2020, 12, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Warren, G.W.; Koziel, M.G.; Mullins, M.A.; Kostichka, K.; Estruch, J.J. Novel Pesticidal Proteins and Strains. Patent Coop. Treaty WO 96/10083 A1, 4 April 1996. [Google Scholar]
  181. Donovan, W.P.; Engleman, J.T.; Donovan, J.C.; Baum, J.A.; Bunkers, G.J.; Chi, D.J.; Clinton, W.P.; English, L.; Heck, G.R.; Ilagan, O.M.; et al. Discovery and characterization of Sip1A: A novel secreted protein from Bacillus thuringiensis with activity against coleopteran larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Sattar, S.; Maiti, M.K. Molecular Characterization of a Novel Vegetative Insecticidal Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis Effective Against Sap-Sucking Insect Pest. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 21, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Estruch, J.J.; Warren, G.W.; Mullins, M.A.; Nye, G.J.; Craig, J.A.; Koziel, M.G. Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5389–5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Sha, J.; Zhang, J.; Chi, B.; Liu, R.; Li, H.; Gao, J. sip1Ab gene from a native Bacillus thuringiensis strain QZL38 and its insecticidal activity against Colaphellus bowringi Baly. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2018, 28, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Warren, G.W. Vegetative Insecticidal Proteins. In Advances in Insect Control; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 1997; pp. 109–122. [Google Scholar]
  186. Han, S.; Craig, J.A.; Putnam, C.D.; Carozzi, N.B.; Tainer, J.A. Evolution and mechanism from structures of an ADP-ribosylating toxin and NAD complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 932–936. [Google Scholar]
  187. Shi, Y.; Ma, W.; Yuan, M.; Sun, F.; Pang, Y. Cloning of vip1/vip2 genes and expression of Vip1Ca/Vip2Ac proteins in Bacillus thuringiensis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Barth, H.; Aktories, K.; Popoff, M.R.; Stiles, B.G. Binary bacterial toxins: Biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004, 68, 373–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Chakroun, M.; Banyuls, N.; Bel, Y.; Escriche, B.; Ferré, J. Bacterial Vegetative Insecticidal Proteins (Vip) from Entomopathogenic Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 329–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Feitelson, J.S.; Schnepf, H.E.; Narva, K.E.; Stockhoff, B.A.; Schmeits, J.; Loewer, D.; Dullum, C.J.; Muller-Cohn, J.; Stamp, L. Pesticidal Toxins and Nucleotide Sequences Which Encode These Toxins. U.S. Patent 6,204,435 B1, 20 March 2001. [Google Scholar]
  191. Boets, A.; Arnaut, G.; Van Rie, J.; Damme, N. Toxins. U.S. Patent 7,919,609 B2, 5 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  192. Bi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, C.; Crickmore, N.; Wang, Q.; Du, L.; Song, F.; Zhang, J. Genomic sequencing identifies novel Bacillus thuringiensis Vip1/Vip2 binary and Cry8 toxins that have high toxicity to Scarabaeoidea larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Leuber, M.; Orlik, F.; Schiffler, B.; Sickmann, A.; Benz, R. Vegetative Insecticidal Protein (Vip1Ac) of Bacillus thuringiensis HD201: Evidence for oligomer and channel formation. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Geng, J.; Jiang, J.; Shu, C.; Wang, Z.; Song, F.; Geng, L.; Duan, J.; Zhang, J. Bacillus thuringiensis Vip1 functions as a receptor of Vip2 toxin for binary insecticidal activity against Holotrichia parallela. Toxins 2019, 11, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Shi, Y.; Xu, W.; Yuan, M.; Tang, M.; Chen, J.; Pang, Y. Expression of vip1/vip2 genes in Escherichia coli and Bacillus thuringiensis and the analysis of their signal peptides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yu, X.; Liu, T.; Liang, X.; Tang, C.; Zhu, J.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Deng, Q.; Wang, L.; Zheng, A.; et al. Rapid detection of vip1-type genes from Bacillus cereus and characterization of a novel vip binary toxin gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 325, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Baranek, J.; Kaznowski, A.; Konecka, E.; Naimov, S. Activity of vegetative insecticidal proteins Vip3Aa58 and Vip3Aa59 of Bacillus thuringiensis against lepidopteran pests. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015, 130, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Wraight, S.P.; Lacey, L.A.; Kabaluk, J.T.; Gottel, M.S. Potential for Microbial Biological Control of Coleopteran and Hemipteran Pests of Potato—Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC). Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 3, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  199. Beveridge, N.; Elek, J.A. Insect and host-tree species influence the effectiveness of a Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis-based insecticide for controlling chrysomelid leaf beetles. Aust. J. Entomol. 2001, 40, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Coyle, D.R.; McMillin, J.D.; Krause, S.C.; Hart, E.R. Laboratory and field evaluations of two Bacillus thuringiensis formulations, Novodor and Raven, for control of Cottonwood Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Way, M.O.; Wallace, R.G.; Harper, H.B.; Landry, C.L. Control of Rice Water Weevil with Novodor 3, 1999. Arthropod Manag. Tests 2000, 25, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Baum, J.A.; Johnson, T.B. Bacillus thuringiensis: Natural and recombinant bioinsecticide products. In Methods in Biotechnology, Vol5: Biopesticides: Use and Deliver; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1999; pp. 189–209. [Google Scholar]
  203. Sanchis, V. From microbial sprays to insect-resistant transgenic plants: History of the biospesticide Bacillus thuringiensis. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 31, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gawron-Burke, C.; Baum, J.A. Genetic Manipulation of Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Crystal Protein Genes in Bacteria. In Genetic Engineering; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1991; Volume 13, pp. 237–263. [Google Scholar]
  205. Baum, J.A.; Kakefuda, M.; Gawron-burke, C. Engineering Bacillus thuringiensis Bioinsecticides with an Indigenous Site-Specific Recombination System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 4367–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Perlak, F.; Stone, T.; Muskopf, Y.; Petersen, L.; Parker, G.; McPherson, S.; Wyman, J.; Love, S.; Reed, G.; Biever, D. Genetically improved potatoes: Protection from damage by Colorado potato beetles. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 22, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Duncan, D.R.; Hammond, D.; Zalewski, J.; Cudnohufsky, J.; Kaniewski, W.; Thornton, M.; Bookout, J.T.; Lavrik, P.; Rogan, G.J.; Feldman-Riebe, J. Field performance of “Transgenic” potato, with resistance to Colorado Potato Beetle and Viruses. HortScience 2002, 37, 556E–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Thomas, P.E.; Kaniewski, W.K.; Lawson, E.C. Reduced Field Spread of Potato Leafroll Virus in Potatoes Transformed with the Potato Leafroll Virus Coat Protein Gene. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 1447–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Thornton, M. The Rise and Fall of NewLeaf Potatoes. NABC Rep. 2004, 15, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  210. Vaughn, T.; Cavato, T.; Brar, G.; Coombe, T.; DeGooyer, T.; Ford, S.; Groth, M.; Howe, A.; Johnson, S.; Kolacz, K.; et al. A Method of controlling corn rootworm feeding using a Bacillus thuringiensis protein expressed in transgenic maize. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Gassmann, A.J.; Shrestha, R.B.; Jakka, S.R.K.; Dunbar, M.W.; Clifton, E.H.; Paolino, A.R.; Ingber, D.A.; French, B.W.; Masloski, K.E.; Dounda, J.W.; et al. Evidence of resistance to Cry34/35Ab1 Corn by Western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): Root Injury in the Field and Larval Survival in Plant-Based Bioassays. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 1872–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Zukoff, S.N.; Ostlie, K.R.; Potter, B.; Meihls, L.N.; Zukoff, A.L.; French, L.; Ellersieck, M.R.; French, B.W.; Hibbard, B.E. Multiple assays indicate varying levels of cross resistance in Cry3Bb1-selected field populations of the western corn rootworm to mCry3A, eCry3.1Ab, and Cry34/35Ab1. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 1387–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Wangila, D.S.; Gassmann, A.J.; Petzold-Maxwell, J.L.; French, B.W.; Meinke, L.J. Susceptibility of Nebraska Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations to Bt corn events. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Jakka, S.R.K.; Shrestha, R.B.; Gassmann, A.J. Broad-spectrum resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins by western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Shrestha, R.B.; Dunbar, M.W.; French, B.W.; Gassmann, A.J. Effects of field history on resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Ferré, J.; Van Rie, J.; Macintosh, S.C. Insecticidal Genetically Modified Crops and Insect Resistance Management (IRM). In Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Cropts within IPM Programs; Springer Science + Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  217. Carrière, Y.; Crickmore, N.; Tabashnik, B.E. Optimizing yramided transgenic Bt crops for sustainable pest management. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 61–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Onstad, D.W.; Meinke, L.J. Modeling evolution of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera to transgenic corn with two insecticidal traits. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Toxins 12 00430 g001 550
Figure 1. Number of susceptible coleopteran insects to Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) proteins, grouped into protein families.
Figure 1. Number of susceptible coleopteran insects to Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) proteins, grouped into protein families.
Toxins 12 00430 g001
Toxins 12 00430 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative length of 3-domain Cry proteins of B. thuringiensis, representing both main sizes of approximately 130 and 70 kDa. Dashed parts represent the activated toxin, while the white boxes represent the amino- and carboxy-terminal parts. Adapted from Bravo et al., 2007 [33].
Figure 2. Relative length of 3-domain Cry proteins of B. thuringiensis, representing both main sizes of approximately 130 and 70 kDa. Dashed parts represent the activated toxin, while the white boxes represent the amino- and carboxy-terminal parts. Adapted from Bravo et al., 2007 [33].
Toxins 12 00430 g002
Toxins 12 00430 g003 550
Figure 3. Bacillus thuringiensis proteins, with particular activity against coleopteran pests, for which three-dimensional structure has been predicted. (A) Cry3Aa (PBD accession number 4QX1); (B) Cry8Ea (PBD accession number 3EB7); (C) Protein complex Cry23Aa/Cry37Aa (PBD accession number 4RHZ); (D) Binary proteins Cry34Ab and Cry35Ab (PBD accession number 4JOX and 4JPO); (E) Cyt1Aa (PBD accession number 3RON); (F) Secretable protein Vip2Aa with a NAD complex (PBD accession number 1QS2).
Figure 3. Bacillus thuringiensis proteins, with particular activity against coleopteran pests, for which three-dimensional structure has been predicted. (A) Cry3Aa (PBD accession number 4QX1); (B) Cry8Ea (PBD accession number 3EB7); (C) Protein complex Cry23Aa/Cry37Aa (PBD accession number 4RHZ); (D) Binary proteins Cry34Ab and Cry35Ab (PBD accession number 4JOX and 4JPO); (E) Cyt1Aa (PBD accession number 3RON); (F) Secretable protein Vip2Aa with a NAD complex (PBD accession number 1QS2).
Toxins 12 00430 g003
Toxins 12 00430 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the particularities in the mechanism of action of crystal proteins against coleopteran pests. (1) Crystal solubilizes in the acidic conditions of the coleopteran midgut lumen and (2) activates into toxin by proteolytic processing of the protoxin by the specific digestive enzymes, specially cysteine and aspartic proteases. (3) Toxins are able to bind to a first receptor (CADR), (4) oligomerizate and (5) form an oligomeric pre-pore structure that (6) is able to bind to a second specific receptor (ADAM metalloproteases/GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatases/sodium solute symporters). This event induces the insertion into the membrane, leading to (7) pore formation and finally to cell lysis.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the particularities in the mechanism of action of crystal proteins against coleopteran pests. (1) Crystal solubilizes in the acidic conditions of the coleopteran midgut lumen and (2) activates into toxin by proteolytic processing of the protoxin by the specific digestive enzymes, specially cysteine and aspartic proteases. (3) Toxins are able to bind to a first receptor (CADR), (4) oligomerizate and (5) form an oligomeric pre-pore structure that (6) is able to bind to a second specific receptor (ADAM metalloproteases/GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatases/sodium solute symporters). This event induces the insertion into the membrane, leading to (7) pore formation and finally to cell lysis.
Toxins 12 00430 g004
Table
Table 1. Insecticidal activity of Cry and Cyt proteins against coleopteran pests.
Table 1. Insecticidal activity of Cry and Cyt proteins against coleopteran pests.
Crystal Type ToxinTarget InsectActivity (a)LC50 (b)Reference
Scientific NameFamily
Cry1AaAnoplophora glabripennisCerambycidaeN [86]
Apriona germariCerambycidaeN [87]
Epilachna varivestisCoccinellidaeA [88]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeLA [89]
Cry1AbDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [90]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [90]
Phyllotreta armoraciaeChrysomelidaeN [90]
Adalia bipunctataCoccinellidaeN [91]
Atheta coriariaCoccinellidaeN [91]
Cryptolaemus montrouzieriCoccinellidaeN [91]
Harmonia axyridisCoccinellidaeN [92]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [90]
Hypera posticaCurculionidaeN [90]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeN [90]
Cry1AcDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [90]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [90]
Phyllotreta armoraciaeChrysomelidaeN [90]
Hippodamia convergensCoccinellidaeN [93]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [90]
Hypera posticaCurculionidaeN [90,94]
Haptoncus luteolusNitidulidaeN [95]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [96]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeN [90]
Cry1AhPropylea japónicaCoccinellidaeN [97]
Cry1AjHarmonia axyridisCoccinellidaeN [92]
Cry1BaAnoplophora glabripennisCerambycidaeN [86]
Acanthoscelides obtectusChrysomelidaeA [75]
Chrysomela scripta FChrysomelidaeA1.8 // 5.9[71,72]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA1050 // 142[71,73]
Phaedon cochleariaeChrysomelidaeN [98]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA305.32[74]
Asymmathetes vulcanorumCurculionidaeN [99]
Hypothenemus hampeiCurculionidaeA [100]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1CaTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1DaTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1EaTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1FaCryptolestes pusillusLaemophloeidaeN [17]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [17]
Cry1FbTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1IaAcanthoscelides obtectusChrysomelidaeA [75]
Agelastica coeruleaChrysomelidaeN [101,102]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [103]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA33.7 // 10[73,104]
Phaedom brassicaeChrysomelidaeN [101]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA21.5 // 230 [76,105]
Asymmathetes vulcanorumCurculionidaeN [99]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [106]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry1IbPhaedom brassicaeChrysomelidaeN [101]
Agelastica coeruleaChrysomelidaeN [101]
Cry1IdAgelastica coeruleaChrysomelidaeN [102]
Cry1IeCeratoma trifurcataChrysomelidaeN [107]
Pyrrhalta aenescensChrysomelidaeN [108]
Cry1JbDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [109]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [109]
Cry2AaDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [93]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [93]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [93]
Hippodamia convergensCoccinellidaeN [93]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [93]
Cry2AbPropylea japonicaCoccinellidaeN [97]
Haptoncus luteolusNitidulidaeN [95]
Cry3AaRhyzophertha dominicaBostrichidaeA1.17 μg/mg[110]
Cylas brunneusBrentidaeA1.88 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA1.99 μg/g[56]
Apriona germariCerambycidaeA [94,111]
Acanthoscelides obtectusChrysomelidaeA [75]
Agelastica alniChrysomelidaeA [112]
Brontispa longissimiChrysomelidaeA0.475 mg/mL[113]
Chrysomela tremulaeChrysomelidaeA [114]
Chrysomela scripta FChrysomelidaeA [115]
Chrysomela scripta FChrysomelidaeA2.22 // 1.8[71,72]
Colaphellus bowringiChrysomelidaeA2.68 // 1.33 [116,117]
Crioceris quaturdicerumpunctataChrysomelidaeA3.82[117]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [90,118]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [118,119]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA1.84 // 3.56[73,118]
Phaedom brassicaeChrysomelidaeA1.11[117]
Phaedon cochleariaeChrysomelidaeA [120]
Phyllotreta armoraciaeChrysomelidaeN [90]
Plagiodera versicoloraChrysomelidaeA1.13 // 3.09 [18]
Pyrrhalta aenescensChrysomelidaeA0.22 mg/ml[121]
Pyrrhalta luteolaChrysomelidaeA0.12 μg/cm2[49]
Adalia bipunctataCoccinellidaeN [91]
Atheta coriariaCoccinellidaeN [91]
Cryptolaemus montrouzieriCoccinellidaeN [91]
Epilachna varivestisCoccinellidaeA [88]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [90]
Asymmathetes vulcanorumCurculionidaeN [99]
Hypera posticaCurculionidaeN [90]
Hypothenemus hampeiCurculionidaeA [100]
Myllocerus undecimpustulatusCurculionidaeA152 ng/cm2[122]
Premnotrypes voraxCurculionidaeLA [123]
Sitophilus oryzaeCurculionidaeA [124]
Amphimallon solstitialeScarabaeidaeA [112]
Anomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [116]
Melontha melonthaScarabaeidaeA [112]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeN [90]
Alphitobius diaperinusTenebrionidaeA9.58 // 8 μg/cm2[62,125]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [96,110]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA0.46 g/10 g[89]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeA11.4 μg/larve[126]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeA [110,127]
Cry3BaCylas brunneusBrentidaeA1.304 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA1.273 μg/g[56]
Chrysomela scripta FChrysomelidaeA [115]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA107 ng/mm2[128]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA1.35 ng/mm2[128]
Epilachna varivestisCoccinellidaeN [88]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA1[37]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA1.60 g/10 g[89]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA13.55 mg/mL[37,96]
Cry3BbCylas brunneusBrentidaeA1.83 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA1.82 μg/g[56]
Anoplophora glabripennisCerambycidaeN [86]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA9.49 // 1.18[118,129]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA2.10 // 5.18[118,129]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA6.86 // 6.54[118,129]
Alphitobius diaperinusTenebrionidaeA26.52 // 50 μg/cm2[62,125]
Cry3CaCylas brunneusBrentidaeA0.69 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA0.57 μg/g[56]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA0.7 // 320.13[130,131]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [96]
Cry6AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA77 µg/cm2[66,119]
Hypera brunneipennisCurculionidaeA [66]
Hypera posticaCurculionidaeA [66]
Cry6BaHypera posticaCurculionidaeA280 ng/μl[94]
Cry7AaCylas brunneusBrentidaeA0.44 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA0.34 μg/g[56]
Anoplophora glabripennisCerambycidaeN [86]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [52]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA13.1 // 18.8 [52,57]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [52]
Cry7AbAcanthoscelides obtectusChrysomelidaeA [75]
Ceratoma trifurcataChrysomelidaeN [107]
Colaphellus bowringiChrysomelidaeA293.79[132]
Pyrrhalta aenescensChrysomelidaeN [58]
Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculataCoccinellidaeA209[58,133]
Anomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [58]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeLA [89]
Cry8AaLeptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA [134]
Cotinis sppScarabaeidaeA [135]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeLA [89]
Cry8AbHolotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeA5.72 μg/g[136]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeA2.00 μg/g[136]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [136]
Cry8BaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [119]
Cotinis sppScarabaeidaeA [137]
Cyclocephala borealisScarabaeidaeA [135]
Cyclocephala pasadenaeScarabaeidaeA [135]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA [135]
Cry8BbDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA [138]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [138]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA [138]
Cry8CaAnoplophora glabripennisCerambycidaeN [86]
Colaphellus bowringiChrysomelidaeN [116]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [116]
Epilachna varivestisCoccinellidaeA [88]
Anomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeA1.75 × 10 × 108 CFU/g[116]
Anomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeA1.6 × 10 × 108 CFU/g[139,140]
Anomala cupreaScarabaeidaeA [141]
Anomala exoletaScarabaeidaeA [142]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeA9.24 × 10 × 108 CFU/g[140]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA12.3 μg/g[35]
Alphitobius diaperinusTenebrionidaeA7.71 // 10 μg/cm2[62,125]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry8DaAnomala cupreaScarabaeidaeA [143]
Anomala orientalisScarabaeidaeA [143]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA17.0 μg/g[35,143]
Cry8DbPopillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA19.6 μg/g[35]
Cry8EaPlagiodera versicoloraChrysomelidaeA [144]
Anomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeA [140]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeA0.9 × 10 × 108 CFU/mL[59,64,144]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA [144]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [64]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [64,89]
Cry8FaAnomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [59]
Holotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [59]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeN [59]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry8GaHolotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [60]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeN [60]
Cry8KaAnthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA2.83–8.93 [63]
Cry8NaAnomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [65]
Holotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [65]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeA3.18 × 10 × 1010 CFU/g[65]
Cry8SaHolotrichia serrata (F.)ScarabaeidaeA [145]
Cry9BbDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [146]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [146]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [146]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeN [146]
Cry9DaAnomala cupreaScarabaeidaeA [77]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cry10AaAnthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA7.12 [78]
Cry14AaTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeLA [89]
Cry15AaLeptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [147]
Cry18Aa1Melontha melonthaScarabaeidaeA [148]
Cry22AaAnthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA0.75 μg/well[68]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA1.25 g/10 g[89]
Cry22AbCylas brunneusBrentidaeA1.01 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA0.78 μg/g[56]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA39.4 μg/cm2[69]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [69]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [69]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA3.12 μg/well[68]
Cry22BaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [68]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA [68]
Cry23Aa/37AaCylas brunneusBrentidaeA0.46 μg/g[56]
Cylas puncticollisBrentidaeA0.42 μg/g[56]
Acanthoscelides obtectusChrysomelidaeA [75]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA [149]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA [37]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA6.30 μg SC/μL[37,61]
Cry34AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40]
Cry34AbDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeLA [150]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40,82]
Cry34AcDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40]
Cry34Aa/35AaDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA34.1 μg/well[151]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA34 μg/cm2[81,151]
Cry34Ab/35AbRhyzophertha dominicaBostrichidaeN [17]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA [150]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA3 μg/cm2[40,81]
Oryzaephilus surinamensisCucujidaeLA [17]
Sitophilus oryzaeCurculionidaeLA [17]
Trogoderma variabileDermestidaeN [17]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeLA [17]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeLA [17]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [96]
Cry34Ac/35AcDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA7 μg/cm2[40,81]
Cry34Ba/35BaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [39]
Cry35AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40]
Cry35AbDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40,82]
Cry35AcDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [40]
Cry36ADiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA147.3 μg/well[151]
Cry37AaTribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA1.25 g/10 g[89]
Cry38AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [39]
Cry43AaAnomala cupreaScarabaeidaeA [152]
Cry43BaAnomala cupreaScarabaeidaeN [152]
Cry51AaDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeN [79]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [79]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA [79]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA1.45 g/10 g[89]
Cry55AaPhyllotreta cruciferaeChrysomelidaeA [80]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeN [89]
Cyt1AaChrysomela scripta FChrysomelidaeA132.6[72]
Cyt2CaDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA25 μg/well[83]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA10.8 μg/well[83]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA [83]
Diapepes abbreviatusCurculionidaeA50.7[84,85]
Popillia japonicaScarabaeidaeA [83]
Tribolium castaneumTenebrionidaeA [83]
(a) The parameter is mortality. A = active; N = not active; LA = low activity, with significant inhibition of growth; (b) LC50 = lethal concentration that causes 50% mortality of the insects. Data are expressed in μg/mL, unless otherwise stated. “//” separate two different values of the LC50.
Table
Table 2. Insecticidal activity of Vip and Sip proteins against coleopteran pests.
Table 2. Insecticidal activity of Vip and Sip proteins against coleopteran pests.
Crystal Type ToxinTarget InsectActivity (a)LC50 (b)Reference
Scientific NameFamily
Sip1AaDiabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA [181]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [181]
Colaphellus bowringiChrysomelidaeA1.07[184]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA24[181]
Sip1AbColaphellus bowringiChrysomelidaeA1.05[184]
Hloltrichia diomphaliaScarabaeidaeN [184]
Vip1AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [185]
Vip1AcHolotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [196]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [195]
Vip1adAnomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Holotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Vip1DaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [191]
Vip2AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [185]
Vip2AcTenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [195]
Vip2AdDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [191]
Vip2AeHolotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [196]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [196]
Vip2AgAnomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Holotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeN [192]
Vip1Aa+Vip2AaDiabrotica longicornis B.ChrysomelidaeA [185]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA [185]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [185]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeN [185]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [185]
Vip1Aa+Vip2AbDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [185]
Vip1Ab+Vip2AaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [185]
Vip1Ab+Vip2AbDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeN [185]
Vip1Ac+Vip2AcTenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [195]
Vip1Ac+Vip2AeHolotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeN [196]
Tenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [196]
Vip1Ad+Vip2AgAnomala corpulentaScarabaeidaeA220 ng/g soil[192]
Holotrichia oblitaScarabaeidaeA120 ng/g soil[192]
Holotrichia parallelaScarabaeidaeA80 // 2.33 ng/g soil[195,197]
Vip1Ca+Vip2AaTenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [187]
Vip1Da+Vip2AdDiabrotica longicornis B.ChrysomelidaeA213[191]
Diabrotica undecimpuntataChrysomelidaeA4.91[191]
Diabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA437[191]
Leptinotarsa decemlineataChrysomelidaeA37[191]
Anthonomus grandisCurculionidaeA207[191]
Vip1Ba+Vip2BaDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [190]
Vip1Bb+Vip2BbDiabrotica virgiferaChrysomelidaeA [190]
Vip3AaTenebrio molitorTenebrionidaeN [197]
(a) The parameter is mortality. A = active; N = not active; (b) LC50 = lethal concentration that causes 50% mortality of the insects. data are expressed in μg/mL, unless otherwise stated. “//” separate two different values of the LC50.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M.; Villanueva, M.; Escriche, B.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C.; Caballero, P. Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins against Coleopteran Pests. Toxins 2020, 12, 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070430

AMA Style

Domínguez-Arrizabalaga M, Villanueva M, Escriche B, Ancín-Azpilicueta C, Caballero P. Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins against Coleopteran Pests. Toxins. 2020; 12(7):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, Mikel, Maite Villanueva, Baltasar Escriche, Carmen Ancín-Azpilicueta, and Primitivo Caballero. 2020. "Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins against Coleopteran Pests" Toxins 12, no. 7: 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070430

APA Style

Domínguez-Arrizabalaga, M., Villanueva, M., Escriche, B., Ancín-Azpilicueta, C., & Caballero, P. (2020). Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Proteins against Coleopteran Pests. Toxins, 12(7), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12070430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop