Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgment to the Reviewers of Toxins in 2022
Next Article in Special Issue
Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Autonomic Dysreflexia—Detrusor Injection or Urethral Sphincter Injection?
Previous Article in Journal
A Computational Inter-Species Study on Safrole Phase I Metabolism-Dependent Bioactivation: A Mechanistic Insight into the Study of Possible Differences among Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urethral Sphincter Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Non-Spinal Cord Injured Patients with Voiding Dysfunction without Anatomical Obstructions: Which Patients Benefit Most?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/toxins15020095
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder—Results between Young and Elderly Populations, and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes

by
Yin-Chien Ou
1,
Yao-Lin Kao
1,
Yi-Hui Ho
2,
Kuan-Yu Wu
1 and
Hann-Chorng Kuo
3,*
1
Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
2
Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan
3
Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2023, 15(2), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020095
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions: Where Are We Now?)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Intravesical botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection has been recognized as the standard treatment for refractory overactive bladder (OAB). However, its therapeutic efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly reviewed in elderly patients. This study aims to provide treatment outcomes for patients aged ≥75 years, and to identify factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. Patients receiving intradetrusor injections of 100 U onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory OAB between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Urodynamic parameters, underlying comorbidities, subjective success, and unfavorable outcomes were assessed. A total of 192 patients were included, and 65 of them were classified into the elderly group. For the elderly group, 60.0% experienced subjective dryness, and 84.6% remained subjective success at 6 months after the injections. The prevalence rates of common unfavorable outcomes, including urinary tract infections, large post-void residual urine volume, and urinary retention, were 9.2%, 27.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that female, baseline urodynamic parameters, and diabetes mellitus were associated with unfavorable outcomes in the elderly group. Intravesical BoNT-A injections provide comparable therapeutic efficacy and safety concerns in elderly patients with refractory OAB. A thorough consultation for treatment benefits and possible adverse events is mandatory before the procedure.
Keywords:
botulinum toxins; type A; urinary bladder; overactive; aged; postoperative complications
Key Contribution: This study highlights the treatment outcomes of intravesical botulinum toxin type A injections for refractory overactive bladder syndrome in an extremely old population (≥75 years). Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes will provide more prudent and precise patient selection in this fragile population.

1. Introduction

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a syndrome defined by the International Continence Society and is characterized by urinary urgency, with or without urgency urinary incontinence, and usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia [1,2]. Large population-based surveys revealed that the prevalence of OAB increases with age, and is slightly higher for elderly males over females [3,4]. Many studies have described the negative influence of OAB on health-related quality of life, including anxiety, depression, sleep disorder, social withdrawal, and sexual life impairment [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Likewise, urinary incontinence is known to negatively affect the quality of life in the elderly population [11] and is also responsible for low self-esteem and depression [12]. To treat the bothersome storage symptoms of OAB, antimuscarinic agents have been developed to inhibit spontaneous detrusor smooth muscle contractions and reduce afferent signals during bladder filling [13]. The therapeutic effect of antimuscarinic agents has been proven; however, insufficient symptom relief and concomitant adverse events cause poor medication persistence and adherence [14]. Solifenacin and fesoterodine have been shown to have limited impact on cognitive function and few central nervous system adverse events for patients ≥65 years after short-term exposure [15,16,17]. Even though, uncertainty regarding cognitive decline after long-term cumulative anticholinergic exposure still limits their use in the elderly population [18,19]. On the other hand, β3-adrenoceptor agonists facilitate relaxation of the detrusor muscle during bladder filling. Both mirabegron and vibegron have been confirmed to be effective and well-tolerated in the elderly population [20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, most participants in the clinical trials were relatively healthy and did not have uncontrolled cardiovascular diseases. The long-term application of these pharmacological agents in the elderly population remains questionable.
The efficacy of intravesical injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has been established for patients with OAB who have an insufficient response to first-line pharmacological agents [26,27]. However, most of these published data did not focus on the elderly population, and only a handful of studies included a population with a mean age of ≥65 years old [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. In addition, 75 years of age has been proposed as a new cutoff value to redefine the elderly because of the global extension of life expectancy [36]. Exploring the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events associated with BoNT-A injections in this vulnerable population is urgently necessary [37]. The commonly reported adverse events after BoNT-A injection include large post-void residual urine volume (PVR), urinary retention, and urinary tract infection (UTI) [38]. However, factors that can help identify patients at risk of these unfavorable outcomes are still limited, especially in the elderly population. Therefore, the primary aim of our study is to retrospectively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of intravesical BoNT-A injection for refractory OAB, and the secondary aim is to investigate the factors associated with unfavorable outcomes in an elderly population aged ≥75 years.

2. Results

In total, 192 patients received intravesical BoNT-A injections for refractory OAB symptoms during the study period. During the administration of injections, 65 (33.9%) patients were classified into the elderly group (≥75 years old), and the remaining 127 (66.1%) patients were classified into the young group. For the young and elderly groups, the mean age was 58.8 ± 11.9 and 82.0 ± 4.6 years old, respectively. A higher percentage of males was found in the elderly group compared to the young group (75.5% and 34.6%, respectively). More comorbidities were found in the elderly group, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dementia, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. The multichannel urodynamic parameters for baseline bladder function prior to BoNT-A injection are listed in Table 1. For the filling phase parameters, the elderly bladders are more sensitive to filling, and have a smaller cystometric bladder capacity (CBC) compared to those of the young. For the voiding phase parameters, a higher detrusor pressure at the maximal flow rate (PdetQmax), a slower maximum flow rate (Qmax), and a smaller voided volume (VV) were found for the elderly group compared to the young group.
Primary outcomes after intravesical BoNT-A injections are shown in Table 2. At 6 months after the injection, 77.2% and 84.6% of patients in the young and elderly group remained subjective success, respectively. The subjective success rate was comparable in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after the injections. Additionally, more than 60% of patients in both groups experienced a certain period of subjective dryness without any urge incontinence. Compared to the baseline uroflowmetry parameters, the CBC and PVR were significantly increased, and the voiding efficiency was significantly decreased in both groups three months postoperatively. In addition, the postoperative CBC and VV were smaller, and Qmax was slower (265.8 ± 126.0 vs. 332.5 ± 158.1 mL, p = 0.010; 156.9 ± 106.1 vs. 220.4 ± 139.6 mL, p = 0.007; and 11.0 ± 7.3 vs. 15.5 ± 10.7 mL/s, p = 0.007, respectively) in the elderly group than in the young group. The prevalence of unfavorable outcomes such as a large PVR, urinary retention, and UTI did not vary between groups. For the young and elderly group, 29 (22.8%) and 18 (27.7%) patients were found to have large PVR, and 11 (8.7%) and 8 (12.3%) patients eventually experienced urinary retention and required catheterization to empty the bladder, respectively. Indwelling Foley catheters were used for all the 11 patients in the elderly group and 4 patients in the young group. Clean intermittent catheterization was used by the other 4 patients in the young group. The catheterization period persisted within one week for 7 patients, between one week to one month for 5 patients, and up to two months for 7 patients. Additionally, 18 (14.2%) and 6 (9.2%) patients in the young and elderly group experienced UTI, respectively.
Table 3 shows the baseline clinical characteristics and multichannel urodynamic parameters of elderly patients with or without postoperative unfavorable outcomes: 6 (9.2%), 18 (27.7%), and 8 (12.3%) patients in the elderly group had postoperative UTI, large PVR, and urinary retention, respectively. For baseline multichannel urodynamic parameters, patients with postoperative UTI tended to have lower bladder compliance (19.7 ± 12.5 vs. 61.0 ± 67.3 mL/cmH2O, p = 0.014) and a higher PdetQmax (56.2 ± 33.2 vs. 29.0 ± 17.4 cmH2O, p = 0.013) compared to those without UTI, whereas patients with postoperative large PVR or with urinary retention tended to have higher PdetQmax (40.1 ± 23.4 vs. 28.3 ± 18.6 cmH2O, p = 0.029; 55.5 ± 27.1 vs. 28.2 ± 17.3 cmH2O, p = 0.001, respectively) compared to those with normal PVR or without urinary retention. Regarding underlying comorbidities, patients with postoperative UTI had a higher prevalence of dementia, while patients suffering postoperative urinary retention had a greater prevalence of DM and cerebrovascular accidents.
For the elderly population, multivariate analysis revealed that female, lower baseline bladder compliance, and higher PdetQmax were significantly associated with postoperative UTI. In addition, a higher baseline PdetQmax and a history of DM were associated with urinary retention. However, the association between higher baseline PdetQmax and postoperative large PVR failed to achieve significance (OR: 1.027, p = 0.075) after adjusting for age and gender (Table 4).
Forty-three (33.9%) patients in the young group and 14 (21.5%) patients in the elderly group received subsequent injection cycles after the initial BoNT-A effect vanished, whereas the other 135 (70.4%) patients received only one episode of BoNT-A injection. The injection cycles between young and old patient groups are shown in Table 5.

3. Discussion

The role of BoNT-A in treating refractory OAB is well established in both sexes [26,27]. However, studies focusing on efficacy and adverse events in the elderly population are limited [38]. In addition, with the extension of life expectancy, “75 years of age and over” is increasingly being used to define the elderly population [36]. Hence, our study defined the elderly population as patients aged 75 years or older. We aimed to determine the therapeutic outcome of intravesical BoNT-A in this population and identify valuable factors associated with adverse events. Our results revealed that although elderly bladders were more sensitive at baseline compared to young bladders, BoNT-A intravesical injection was equally effective for OAB symptom control. In addition, the prevalence of adverse events was equal in both age groups. Female sex, lower bladder compliance, and higher PdetQmax were associated with postoperative UTI, while DM and higher PdetQmax were associated with postoperative urinary retention in the elderly population.
Several possible pathophysiologies have been proposed to explain refractory OAB [39], including urothelial dysfunction with aging [40], undetected bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), chronic bladder ischemia or inflammation [41,42], and central sensitization [43,44]. These conditions are commonly found in the elderly population owing to aging-induced changes from the brain to the bladder itself [45,46,47]. In our study, more than 75% of patients in the elderly group were men, a proportion much higher than that in the young group. This may further emphasize the importance of chronic undetected BOO in bladder remodeling [48]. It is well-documented that the presence of BOO will result in large PVR and could be a risk of urinary retention after the intravesical BoNT-A injection, especially in the elderly [29,30]. Therefore, in our clinical practice, we will investigate patients with refractory OAB by video-urodynamic study to find if there is BOO, and the BoNT-A injection can only be performed in patients without BOO, or if their BOO has been well-treated. In addition, our findings of the preoperative multichannel urodynamic study in these elderly bladders, including increased bladder sensation and reduction in bladder capacity, were consistent with the known changes in the aging bladder [46]. Intravesical BoNT-A injection provides sensory blockade in addition to chemo-denervation of the bladder detrusor muscle [49,50]. This may explain why patients who are refractory to conventional OAB medications can be successfully treated with BoNT-A.
To the best of our knowledge, no case-control study has compared the therapeutic efficacy of BoNT-A between patients aged ≥75 years and those aged <75 years. White et al. [34] reported a case series of 21 refractory OAB patients aged 75 years and older and concluded that BoNT-A injection is efficacious, durable, and has a low incidence of adverse events in the short term. Frailty has been proposed as a negative factor for long-term treatment success, but this study used “age greater than 65 years” as the definition of elderly [29]. Our study demonstrated that the elderly population (≥75 years old) had similar subjective success rates at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared with the young population. Furthermore, with no between-group differences, >60% of patients in both groups eventually experienced a certain period of subjective dryness without urge incontinence. This highlights that age itself is not a direct factor that affects the bladder response to BoNT-A. Instead, the underlying pathophysiologies that develop during the aging process to induce refractory OAB are key factors in determining therapeutic outcomes.
Considering the direct chemo-denervation effect on the bladder detrusor muscle, PVR elevation and urinary retention are common concerns after intravesical BoNT-A injections [51]. A large PVR is commonly defined as a PVR greater than 150 or 200 mL, and approximately 6–61% of patients with a mean age > 65 years have been reported to experience a large PVR after receiving injections [28,29,30,35]. Miotla et al. reported that female patients with PVR > 200 mL or retention after injections were older than those with PVR < 200 mL [52]. Liao and Kuo proposed that instead of age, frailty was associated with post-injection PVR > 150 mL [29]. In our elderly population (≥75 years old), 18 (27.7%) patients were found to have a large PVR > 200 ml after BoNT-A intravesical injection, and eight (12.3%) patients eventually experienced urinary retention and needed temporary Foley catheter indwelling. There was no difference in the prevalence of a large PVR and urinary retention between the elderly and young populations. Although no valuable factor could be found to be associated with large postoperative PVR in our elderly population, a higher baseline PdetQmax and a history of DM were identified as factors associated with postoperative urinary retention. DM is a well-known factor that induces overactive bladder and affects detrusor contractility during the voiding phase [53]. Wang et al. reported that intravesical BoNT-A successfully managed detrusor overactivity and achieved a similar treatment success rate in both DM and non-DM patients but with a higher risk of large PVR and general weakness in DM patients [54]. In elderly patients with DM, detailed consultation and close follow-up for postoperative PVR are necessary.
UTI is another common but frustrating unfavorable outcome after intravesical BoNT-A injections [55]. A recent systemic review revealed that the prevalence rate of UTI after intravesical BoNT-A injection for treating OAB is approximately 29.8% [56]. Both storage and emptying dysfunction have been proposed to impact UTI recurrence [57,58]. In our study, we found that female sex, lower bladder compliance, and a higher PdetQmax were associated with postoperative UTI in the elderly population. Lower bladder compliance and higher PdetQmax are common bladder dysfunctions that increase intravesical pressure during both the storage and emptying phases. Increased intravesical pressure is known to cause bladder ischemia, which may predispose the bladder to infection because of a delayed or insufficient immune response [59,60].
Although the present study successfully demonstrated the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events of intravesical BoNT-A injections in a population older than most of the published data, some limitations still exist. First, its retrospective design made it possible to involve biases during patient selection, data collection, and statistical analysis. Moreover, we could not further define ‘frailty’ by retrospectively reviewing the medical records. Instead, we believe that using 75 years as the cutoff value would be indeed a reasonable choice. Second, the small sample size in the elderly group limited the statistical power in multivariate logistic regression analyses, and also hindered the subgroup analysis for different sexes. Third, no postoperative multichannel urodynamic data were available to provide detailed bladder storage function after BoNT-A injection. Considering the invasiveness of the test, a simple uroflowmetry with PVR is commonly used to represent postoperative bladder function. Finally, in the long-term follow-up, we found only 29.7% of refractory OAB patients received subsequent BoNT-A injection in our hospital. This result indicates that the patients might not be satisfied with the unfavorable treatment outcome after the first BoNT-A injection and would choose medical therapy for their bothersome OAB symptoms. However, understanding the treatment effect of BoNT-A on the sensory blockade in the elderly population remains limited. Prospective case-control studies are necessary to evaluate treatment outcomes and outcome predictors in this population in detail.

4. Conclusions

Intravesical BoNT-A injections provided equally effective and durable therapeutic outcomes in both young and elderly patients (≥75 years old) with refractory OAB. The prevalence rates of common unfavorable outcomes were equal between the two age groups. For elderly patients receiving intravesical BoNT-A injection, female, lower bladder compliance, and higher PdetQmax were associated with postoperative UTI, whereas a history of DM and higher PdetQmax were associated with urinary retention postoperatively. A thorough consultation for possible benefits and adverse events is mandatory, especially in elderly patients with certain risk factors.

5. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with idiopathic OAB symptoms refractory to conventional medications who received intravesical injections of BoNT-A for the first time at a tertiary medical center in eastern Taiwan. All patients had persistent urgency urinary incontinence even with antimuscarinics, β3-adrenoceptor agonists, or a combination of both for more than three months. A multichannel urodynamic study, including cystometry and a pressure flow study, was performed preoperatively in accordance with the International Continence Society’s good urodynamic practice recommendations [61] to confirm the presence of detrusor overactivity. All patients have been proven to be non-BOO by the video-urodynamic study before receiving the intravesical BoNT-A injections. Patients with underlying neurological factors that may cause neurogenic detrusor overactivity, or intrinsic sphincter deficiency were excluded from this study. Patients who were ≥75 years old while receiving the injections were classified into the elderly group, whereas the others belonged to the young group.
Baseline lower urinary tract function was assessed for each patient using uroflowmetry, PVR, and a multichannel urodynamic study before BoNT-A injection. Parameters including the VV, Qmax, CBC, and voiding efficiency were collected from the uroflowmetry. CBC was defined as the sum of VV and PVR, and voiding efficiency was defined as VV divided by CBC. For the multichannel urodynamic study, bladder sensations, compliance, and the presence of detrusor overactivity were recorded as the filling phase parameters, whereas PdetQmax, Qmax, VV, CBC, and PVR were recorded as the voiding phase parameters. BOO was defined as BOO index >40 for men [62], and as PdetQmax > 35 cmH2O for women [63]. Bladder sensations were further classified as the first sensation of filling, full sensation, and urge sensation, according to the patients’ reports.
All patients were hospitalized and received intravesical injections of 100 units of Botox® (Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA), which is the standard dosage used to treat refractory OAB [26], under general anesthesia in the operating room. The injection method has been described previously [26]. Briefly, 10 mL normal saline was used to dilute each Botox vial. The injection needle was inserted into the posterior and lateral bladder walls under the guidance of rigid cystoscopy, and a total of 20 evenly distributed intradetrusor injections (0.5 mL for each injection) were performed while sparing the trigone area. A 14 Fr. urethral Foley catheter was placed and remained in place for one day after the Botox injection. Objective outcomes were assessed three months after the injections using uroflowmetry and PVR. Subjective treatment success and improvement of urge incontinence were reviewed according to the medical records at the out-patient department during serial follow-ups. As improvement of urinary incontinence and difficult urination might coexist after intravesical BoNT-A injection, patients might consider that they had unsuccessful treatment if they had severe difficulty in urination even though urinary incontinence had improved. Therefore, a subjective success was defined by having a Global Response Assessment (scoring from −3 to +3, indicating markedly worse to markedly improved after the treatment [64]) of +2 or +3. Underlying comorbidities and postoperative unfavorable outcomes, including a large PVR (defined as PVR >200 mL during the follow-up period), urinary retention, and UTI, were also collected from the patients’ medical records. All patients were followed up regularly at the out-patient clinic with or without OAB medication, and repeat BoNT-A injections were performed if patients had recurrence of OAB symptoms and requested for injection, otherwise they were continuously treated with oral medications.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. Continuous and categorical variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and as numbers and percentages, respectively. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was applied when > 20% of the expected frequencies were less than five. Comparisons between baseline and follow-up within-group differences were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Age, gender, and variables demonstrating significant differences between patients with or without each unfavorable outcome were further analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with postoperative unfavorable outcomes in the elderly group. All statistical assessments were considered significant when the two-sided p-value was <0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-C.K.; Data Curation, Y.-C.O. and H.-C.K.; Formal Analysis, Y.-C.O., Y.-L.K. and H.-C.K.; Investigation, Y.-C.O. and Y.-L.K.; Methodology, Y.-C.O., Y.-L.K., Y.-H.H. and K.-Y.W.; Project Administration, H.-C.K.; Resources, H.-C.K.; Supervision, H.-C.K.; Visualization, Y.-C.O., Y.-L.K., Y.-H.H. and K.-Y.W.; Writing—Original Draft, Y.-C.O.; Writing—Review and Editing, Y.-C.O., Y.-L.K. and H.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by grants from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital NCKUH-11206016 and Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation TCMF-SP-108-01 and TCMF-MP-110-03-01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital (IRB 104-23-A).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haylen, B.T.; de Ridder, D.; Freeman, R.M.; Swift, S.E.; Berghmans, B.; Lee, J.; Monga, A.; Petri, E.; Rizk, D.E.; Sand, P.K.; et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010, 21, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abrams, P.; Cardozo, L.; Fall, M.; Griffiths, D.; Rosier, P.; Ulmsten, U.; van Kerrebroeck, P.; Victor, A.; Wein, A. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2002, 21, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Irwin, D.E.; Milsom, I.; Hunskaar, S.; Reilly, K.; Kopp, Z.; Herschorn, S.; Coyne, K.; Kelleher, C.; Hampel, C.; Artibani, W.; et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: Results of the EPIC study. Eur. Urol. 2006, 50, 1306–1314; discussion 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Milsom, I.; Abrams, P.; Cardozo, L.; Roberts, R.G.; Thüroff, J.; Wein, A.J. How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int. 2001, 87, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Teloken, C.; Caraver, F.; Weber, F.A.; Teloken, P.E.; Moraes, J.F.; Sogari, P.R.; Graziottin, T.M. Overactive bladder: Prevalence and implications in Brazil. Eur. Urol. 2006, 49, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gomes, C.M.; Averbeck, M.A.; Koyama, M.; Soler, R. Impact of OAB symptoms on work, quality of life and treatment-seeking behavior in Brazil. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2020, 36, 1403–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patrick, D.L.; Khalaf, K.M.; Dmochowski, R.; Kowalski, J.W.; Globe, D.R. Psychometric performance of the incontinence quality-of-life questionnaire among patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence. Clin. Ther. 2013, 35, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bartoli, S.; Aguzzi, G.; Tarricone, R. Impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: A systematic literature review. Urology 2010, 75, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Amarenco, G.; Arnould, B.; Carita, P.; Haab, F.; Labat, J.J.; Richard, F. European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE: A Quality of Life questionnaire for urinary incontinence. Eur. Urol. 2003, 43, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kosilov, K.; Loparev, S.; Kuzina, I.; Kosilova, L.; Prokofyeva, A. Socioeconomic status and health-related quality of life among adults and older with overactive bladder. Int. J. Qual. Health Care J. Int. Soc. Qual. Health Care 2019, 31, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. El-Gharib, A.K.; Manzour, A.F.; El-Mallah, R.; El Said, S.M.S. Impact of urinary incontinence on physical performance and quality of life (QOL) amongst a group of elderly in Cairo. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e14947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dugan, E.; Cohen, S.J.; Bland, D.R.; Preisser, J.S.; Davis, C.C.; Suggs, P.K.; McGann, P. The association of depressive symptoms and urinary incontinence among older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2000, 48, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Abrams, P.; Andersson, K.E. Muscarinic receptor antagonists for overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2007, 100, 987–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chapple, C.R.; Nazir, J.; Hakimi, Z.; Bowditch, S.; Fatoye, F.; Guelfucci, F.; Khemiri, A.; Siddiqui, E.; Wagg, A. Persistence and Adherence with Mirabegron versus Antimuscarinic Agents in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Observational Study in UK Clinical Practice. Eur. Urol. 2017, 72, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hampel, C.; Betz, D.; Burger, M.; Nowak, C.; Vogel, M. Solifenacin in the Elderly: Results of an Observational Study Measuring Efficacy, Tolerability and Cognitive Effects. Urol. Int. 2017, 98, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wagg, A.; Arumi, D.; Herschorn, S.; Angulo Cuesta, J.; Haab, F.; Ntanios, F.; Carlsson, M.; Oelke, M. A pooled analysis of the efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder, and the relationship between safety, co-morbidity and polypharmacy in patients aged 65 years or older. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wagg, A.; Khullar, V.; Michel, M.C.; Oelke, M.; Darekar, A.; Bitoun, C.E. Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly patients with overactive bladder: Open-label extension of the SOFIA trial. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2014, 33, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cai, X.; Campbell, N.; Khan, B.; Callahan, C.; Boustani, M. Long-term anticholinergic use and the aging brain. Alzheimers Dement. J. Alzheimers Assoc. 2013, 9, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gray, S.L.; Anderson, M.L.; Dublin, S.; Hanlon, J.T.; Hubbard, R.; Walker, R.; Yu, O.; Crane, P.K.; Larson, E.B. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: A prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nitti, V.W.; Rosenberg, S.; Mitcheson, D.H.; He, W.; Fakhoury, A.; Martin, N.E. Urodynamics and safety of the β3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron in males with lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. J. Urol. 2013, 190, 1320–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Herschorn, S.; Staskin, D.; Schermer, C.R.; Kristy, R.M.; Wagg, A. Safety and Tolerability Results from the PILLAR Study: A Phase IV, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Mirabegron in Patients ≥ 65 years with Overactive Bladder-Wet. Drugs Aging 2020, 37, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wagg, A.; Staskin, D.; Engel, E.; Herschorn, S.; Kristy, R.M.; Schermer, C.R. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mirabegron in patients aged ≥65yr with overactive bladder wet: A phase IV, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study (PILLAR). Eur. Urol. 2020, 77, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Staskin, D.; Frankel, J.; Varano, S.; Shortino, D.; Jankowich, R.; Mudd, P.N., Jr. International Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Vibegron in Patients with Symptoms of Overactive Bladder: EMPOWUR. J. Urol. 2020, 204, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Staskin, D.; Frankel, J.; Varano, S.; Shortino, D.; Jankowich, R.; Mudd, P.N., Jr. Once-Daily Vibegron 75 mg for Overactive Bladder: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy from a Double-Blind Extension Study of the International Phase 3 Trial (EMPOWUR). J. Urol. 2021, 205, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Varano, S.; Staskin, D.; Frankel, J.; Shortino, D.; Jankowich, R.; Mudd, P.N., Jr. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Vibegron for Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Patients Aged ≥65 and ≥75 Years: Subpopulation Analysis from the EMPOWUR Randomized, International, Phase III Study. Drugs Aging 2021, 38, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nitti, V.W.; Dmochowski, R.; Herschorn, S.; Sand, P.; Thompson, C.; Nardo, C.; Yan, X.; Haag-Molkenteller, C. OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: Results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo controlled trial. J. Urol. 2013, 189, 2186–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chapple, C.; Sievert, K.D.; MacDiarmid, S.; Khullar, V.; Radziszewski, P.; Nardo, C.; Thompson, C.; Zhou, J.; Haag-Molkenteller, C. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improves all idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur. Urol. 2013, 64, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liao, C.H.; Chen, S.F.; Kuo, H.C. Different number of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections for patients with refractory detrusor overactivity do not affect treatment outcome: A prospective randomized comparative study. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2016, 35, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liao, C.H.; Kuo, H.C. Increased risk of large post-void residual urine and decreased long-term success rate after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection for refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity. J. Urol. 2013, 189, 1804–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuo, H.C.; Liao, C.H.; Chung, S.D. Adverse events of intravesical botulinum toxin a injections for idiopathic detrusor overactivity: Risk factors and influence on treatment outcome. Eur. Urol. 2010, 58, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mateu Arrom, L.; Mayordomo Ferrer, O.; Sabiote Rubio, L.; Gutierrez Ruiz, C.; Martínez Barea, V.; Palou Redorta, J.; Errando Smet, C. Treatment Response and Complications after Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection in Male Patients with Idiopathic Overactive Bladder Syndrome. J. Urol. 2020, 203, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Habashy, D.; Losco, G.; Tse, V.; Collins, R.; Chan, L. Botulinum toxin (OnabotulinumtoxinA) in the male non-neurogenic overactive bladder: Clinical and quality of life outcomes. BJU Int. 2015, 116 (Suppl. S3), 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, S.H.; Habashy, D.; Pathan, S.; Tse, V.; Collins, R.; Chan, L. Eight-Year Experience With Botulinum Toxin Type-A Injections for the Treatment of Nonneurogenic Overactive Bladder: Are Repeated Injections Worthwhile? Int. Neurourol. J. 2016, 20, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. White, W.M.; Pickens, R.B.; Doggweiler, R.; Klein, F.A. Short-term efficacy of botulinum toxin a for refractory overactive bladder in the elderly population. J. Urol. 2008, 180, 2522–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yokoyama, O.; Honda, M.; Yamanishi, T.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Fujii, K.; Nakayama, T.; Mogi, T. OnabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin type A) for the treatment of Japanese patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: Results of single-dose treatment from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (interim analysis). Int. J. Urol. Off. J. Jpn. Urol. Assoc. 2020, 27, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ouchi, Y.; Rakugi, H.; Arai, H.; Akishita, M.; Ito, H.; Toba, K.; Kai, I. Redefining the elderly as aged 75 years and older: Proposal from the Joint Committee of Japan Gerontological Society and the Japan Geriatrics Society. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2017, 17, 1045–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Manns, K.; Khan, A.; Carlson, K.V.; Wagg, A.; Baverstock, R.J.; Trafford Crump, R. The use of onabotulinumtoxinA to treat idiopathic overactive bladder in elderly patients is in need of study. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2022, 41, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kao, Y.L.; Ou, Y.C.; Kuo, H.C. Bladder Dysfunction in Older Adults: The Botulinum Toxin Option. Drugs Aging 2022, 39, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, L.C.; Kuo, H.C. Pathophysiology of refractory overactive bladder. Low. Urin. Tract Symptoms 2019, 11, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mansfield, K.J.; Liu, L.; Mitchelson, F.J.; Moore, K.H.; Millard, R.J.; Burcher, E. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in human bladder detrusor and mucosa, studied by radioligand binding and quantitative competitive RT-PCR: Changes in ageing. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 144, 1089–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Azadzoi, K.M.; Shinde, V.M.; Tarcan, T.; Kozlowski, R.; Siroky, M.B. Increased leukotriene and prostaglandin release, and overactivity in the chronically ischemic bladder. J. Urol. 2003, 169, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lowe, E.M.; Anand, P.; Terenghi, G.; Williams-Chestnut, R.E.; Sinicropi, D.V.; Osborne, J.L. Increased nerve growth factor levels in the urinary bladder of women with idiopathic sensory urgency and interstitial cystitis. Br. J. Urol. 1997, 79, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Avelino, A.; Cruz, C.; Nagy, I.; Cruz, F. Vanilloid receptor 1 expression in the rat urinary tract. Neuroscience 2002, 109, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baron, R.; Hans, G.; Dickenson, A.H. Peripheral input and its importance for central sensitization. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Birder, L.A.; Kullmann, A.F.; Chapple, C.R. The aging bladder insights from animal models. Asian J. Urol. 2018, 5, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Suskind, A.M. The Aging Overactive Bladder: A Review of Aging-Related Changes from the Brain to the Bladder. Curr. Bladder Dysfunct. Rep. 2017, 12, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. de Rijk, M.M.; Wolf-Johnston, A.; Kullmann, A.F.; Taiclet, S.; Kanai, A.J.; Shiva, S.; Birder, L.A. Aging-Associated Changes in Oxidative Stress Negatively Impacts the Urinary Bladder Urothelium. Int. Neurourol. J. 2022, 26, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fusco, F.; Creta, M.; De Nunzio, C.; Iacovelli, V.; Mangiapia, F.; Li Marzi, V.; Finazzi Agrò, E. Progressive bladder remodeling due to bladder outlet obstruction: A systematic review of morphological and molecular evidences in humans. BMC Urol. 2018, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, Y.H.; Chiang, B.J.; Liao, C.H. Mechanism of Action of Botulinum Toxin A in Treatment of Functional Urological Disorders. Toxins 2020, 12, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, J.L.; Kuo, H.C. Clinical application of intravesical botulinum toxin type A for overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis. Investig. Clin. Urol. 2020, 61, S33–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Anger, J.T.; Weinberg, A.; Suttorp, M.J.; Litwin, M.S.; Shekelle, P.G. Outcomes of intravesical botulinum toxin for idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms: A systematic review of the literature. J. Urol. 2010, 183, 2258–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Miotla, P.; Cartwright, R.; Skorupska, K.; Bogusiewicz, M.; Markut-Miotla, E.; Futyma, K.; Rechberger, T. Urinary retention in female OAB after intravesical Botox injection: Who is really at risk? Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017, 28, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, C.C.; Jiang, Y.H.; Kuo, H.C. The Pharmacological Mechanism of Diabetes Mellitus-Associated Overactive Bladder and Its Treatment with Botulinum Toxin A. Toxins 2020, 12, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, C.C.; Liao, C.H.; Kuo, H.C. Diabetes mellitus does not affect the efficacy and safety of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in patients with refractory detrusor overactivity. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2014, 33, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kuo, H.C. Clinical Application of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Lower-Urinary-Tract Diseases and Dysfunctions: Where Are We Now and What More Can We Do? Toxins 2022, 14, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Truzzi, J.C.; Lapitan, M.C.; Truzzi, N.C.; Iacovelli, V.; Averbeck, M.A. Botulinum toxin for treating overactive bladder in men: A systematic review. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2022, 41, 710–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, P.J.; Kuo, H.C. High incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. Low. Urin. Tract Symptoms 2020, 12, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Seki, N.; Masuda, K.; Kinukawa, N.; Senoh, K.; Naito, S. Risk factors for febrile urinary tract infection in children with myelodysplasia treated by clean intermittent catheterization. Int. J. Urol. Off. J. Jpn. Urol. Assoc. 2004, 11, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vasudeva, P.; Madersbacher, H. Factors implicated in pathogenesis of urinary tract infections in neurogenic bladders: Some revered, few forgotten, others ignored. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2014, 33, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McKibben, M.J.; Seed, P.; Ross, S.S.; Borawski, K.M. Urinary Tract Infection and Neurogenic Bladder. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 42, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Drake, M.J.; Doumouchtsis, S.K.; Hashim, H.; Gammie, A. Fundamentals of urodynamic practice, based on International Continence Society good urodynamic practices recommendations. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2018, 37, S50–S60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Nitti, V.W. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: The gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev. Urol. 2005, 7 (Suppl. 6), S14–S21. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Hsiao, S.M.; Lin, H.H.; Kuo, H.C. Videourodynamic Studies of Women with Voiding Dysfunction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Lee, E.S.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, M.E. Effect of transurethral resection with hydrodistention for the treatment of ulcerative interstitial cystitis. Korean J. Urol. 2013, 54, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline multichannel urodynamic parameters.
Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline multichannel urodynamic parameters.
Young Group (<75) YearsElderly Group (≥75 Years)
Mean ± SD or No. (%)Mean ± SD or No. (%)p-Value
Number of patients12765
Age (years)58.8 ± 11.982.0 ± 4.6
Gender (male)44 (34.6)51 (75.5)<0.001
Baseline multichannel urodynamic parameters
 FSF (mL)110.4 ± 64.496.3 ± 66.40.051
 FS (mL)171.5 ± 102.1135.6 ± 87.30.010
 US (mL)201.7 ± 117.1152.4 ± 100.80.003
 CBC (mL)272.6 ± 161.1184.7 ± 109.7<0.001
 Compliance (mL/cmH2O)66.4 ± 76.857.2 ± 65.30.437
 PdetQmax (cmH2O)23.7 ± 16.631.5 ± 20.60.003
Qmax (mL/s)12.7 ± 7.87.8 ± 4.5<0.001
 VV (mL)230.3 ± 142.4155.7 ± 103.4<0.001
 PVR (mL)42.2 ± 100.829.3 ± 50.60.109
Comorbidities
 Hypertension66 (52.0)46 (70.8)0.012
 DM24 (18.9)25 (38.5)0.003
 CVA16 (12.6)13 (20.0)0.175
 Dementia5 (3.9)10 (15.4)0.005
 CAD5 (3.9)13 (20.0)<0.001
 CHF3 (2.4)2 (3.1)1.000
 CKD2 (1.6)5 (7.7)0.045
CAD: coronary artery disease; CBC: cystometric bladder capacity; CHF: congestive heart failure; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DM: diabetes mellitus; FS: full sensation; FSF: first sensation of filling; No.: number; PdetQmax: detrusor pressure at the maximal flow rate; PVR: post-void residual urine volume; Qmax: maximum flow rate; SD: standard deviation; US: urge sensation; VV: voided volume.
Table
Table 2. Primary outcomes and unfavorable outcomes after intravesical BoNT-A injection.
Table 2. Primary outcomes and unfavorable outcomes after intravesical BoNT-A injection.
Young Group (<75 Years)
(n = 127)		Elderly Group (≥75 Years)
(n = 65)		p-Value
Mean ± SD or No. (%)Mean ± SD or No. (%)
Subjective success (No.)
 At 3 months124 (97.6%)63 (96.9%)1.000
 At 6 months98 (77.2%)55 (84.6%)0.225
 At 12 months31 (24.4%)31 (32.3%)0.244
Subjective dryness (No.)85 (66.9%)39 (60.0%)0.342
Uroflowmetry
 Qmax (mL/s)
 Baseline17.0 ± 13.311.3 ± 7.40.001
 3 months15.5 ± 10.711.0 ± 7.30.004
 VV (mL)
 Baseline211.8 ± 149.6138.6 ± 84.70.002
 3 months220.4 ± 139.6156.9 ± 106.10.007
 PVR (mL)
 Baseline48.7 ± 85.038.5 ± 48.70.876
 3 months144.4 ± 114.9 *149.3 ± 117.3 *0.757
 CBC (mL)
 Baseline260.6 ± 164.8177.1 ± 99.10.001
 3 months332.5 ± 158.1 *265.8 ± 126.0 *0.010
 VE (%)
 Baseline81.8 ± 21.679.8 ± 21.00.292
 3 months65.2 ± 71.8 *57.4 ± 27.3 *0.106
Unfavorable outcomes
 Large PVR (> 200 mL) (No.)29 (22.8%)18 (27.7%)0.459
 Urinary retention (No.)11 (8.7%)8 (12.3%)0.423
 UTI (No.)18 (14.2%)6 (9.2%)0.327
CBC: cystometric bladder capacity; No.: number; PVR: post-void residual urine volume; Qmax: maximum flow rate; SD: standard deviation; UTI: urinary tract infection; VE: voiding efficiency; VV: voided volume. * Wilcoxon signed-rank test p < 0.001 at 3 months compared to baseline.
Table
Table 3. Baseline clinical characteristics and multichannel urodynamic parameters in elderly population with or without each unfavorable outcome.
Table 3. Baseline clinical characteristics and multichannel urodynamic parameters in elderly population with or without each unfavorable outcome.
Unfavorable OutcomesUTI Large PVR Urinary Retention
NoYesp-Value≤200 mL>200 mLp-ValueNoYesp Value
Number of patients596 4718 578
Age (years)81.9 ± 4.682.8 ± 5.50.65081.4 ± 4.583.4 ± 4.80.10681.7 ± 4.684.1 ± 4.50.176
Gender (male)48 (81.4)3 (50.0)0.10836 (76.6)15 (83.3)0.74044 (77.2)7 (87.5)0.675
Baseline multichannel urodynamic parameters
 FSF (mL)98.1 ± 68.978.8 ± 29.50.90394.6 ± 66.6100.8 ± 67.60.74795.7 ± 67.8100.4 ± 59.60.660
 FS (mL)137.1 ± 89.7120.8 ± 62.10.903133.7 ± 86.2140.3 ± 92.60.889135.1 ± 86.5138.6 ± 98.90.944
 US (mL)154.5 ± 103.9131.8 ± 66.80.834150.0 ± 97.4158.7 ± 112.11.000152.4 ± 100.5152.8 ± 110.20.992
 CBC (mL)189.8 ± 111.1135.0 ± 88.20.223179.7 ± 96.7197.7 ± 140.60.953188.3 ± 109.7159.3 ± 113.50.442
 Compliance (mL/cmH2O)61.0 ± 67.319.7 ± 12.50.01453.9 ± 63.165.7 ± 71.80.63959.0 ± 68.243.9 ± 39.50.472
 PdetQmax (cmH2O)29.0 ± 17.456.2 ± 33.20.01328.3 ± 18.640.1 ± 23.40.02928.2 ± 17.355.5 ± 27.10.001
 Qmax (mL/s)7.9 ± 4.46.5 ± 5.70.4857.8 ± 4.57.6 ± 4.60.8607.9 ± 4.56.6 ± 4.50.496
 VV (mL)162.5 ± 102.485.0 ± 92.70.048154.7 ± 93.6157.2 ± 128.50.671159.6 ± 99.8125.5 ± 130.00.235
 PVR (mL)27.2 ± 47.950.0 ± 75.40.21425.0 ± 47.040.6 ± 59.10.33228.7 ± 48.233.8 ± 69.50.550
Comorbidities
 Hypertension42 (71.2%)4 (66.7%)1.00033 (70.2)13 (72.2)0.87339 (68.4)7 (87.5)0.420
 DM24 (40.7%)1 (16.7%)0.39315 (31.9)10 (55.6)0.08019 (33.3)6 (75.0)0.047
 CVA11 (18.6%)2 (33.3%)0.5917 (14.9)6 (33.3)0.1629 (15.8)4 (50.0)0.044
 Dementia7 (11.9%)3 (50.0%)0.0427 (14.9)3 (16.7)1.0007 (12.3)3 (37.5)0.098
 CAD11 (18.6%)2 (33.3%)0.5919 (19.1)4 (22.2)0.74312 (21.1)1 (12.5)1.000
 CHF2 (3.4%)0 (0.0%)1.0002 (4.3)0 (0.0)1.0002 (3.5)0 (0.0)1.000
 CKD4 (6.8%)1 (16.7%)0.3944 (8.5)1 (5.6)1.0004 (7.0)1 (12.5)0.493
CAD: coronary artery disease; CBC: cystometric bladder capacity; CHF: congestive heart failure; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DM: diabetes mellitus; FS: full sensation; FSF: first sensation of filling; No.: number; PdetQmax: detrusor pressure at the maximal flow rate; PVR: post-void residual urine volume; Qmax: maximum flow rate; SD: standard deviation; US: urge sensation; UTI: urinary tract infection; VV: voided volume. Data expressed by mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
Table
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with each unfavorable outcome in elderly population.
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with each unfavorable outcome in elderly population.
Postoperative UTI (n = 6) Large PVR > 200 mL (n = 18) Urinary Retention (n = 8)
OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR
(95% CI)		p-Value **OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR
(95% CI)		p-Value **OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)p-Value **
Age1.044 (0.873–1.249)1.344 (0.892–2.026)0.1571.101 (0.975–1.242)1.099 (0.960–1.257)0.1701.120 (0.953–1.315)1.245 (0.942–1.646)0.124
Gender (male)0.229 (0.041–1.292)0.000 (0.000–0.400)0.0291.528 (0.372–6.268)0.803 (0.167–3.866)0.7852.068 (0.233–18.382)0.309 (0.018–5.255)0.416
Compliance0.951 (0.904–1.000)0.903 (0.820–0.995)0.0401.003 (0.995–1.010) 0.994 (0.976–1.013)
PdetQmax1.048 (1.009–1.089) *1.214 (1.007–1.464)0.0421.028 (0.999–1.057)1.027 (0.997–1.058)0.0751.058 (1.013–1.104) *1.077 (1.012–1.145)0.019
DM0.292 (0.032–2.656) 2.667 (0.876–8.122) 6.000 (1.104–32.595) *29.042 (1.114–756.870)0.043
CVA2.182 (0.354–13.458) 2.857 (0.805–10.143) 5.333 (1.123–25.331) *4.683 (0.587–37.359)0.145
Dementia7.429 (1.247–44.239) *0.026 (0.000–3.144)0.1361.143 (0.261–5.005) 4.286 (0.835–21.991)
CI: Confidence interval; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DM: diabetes mellitus; OR: odds ratio; PdetQmax: detrusor pressure at the maximal flow rate; PVR: post-void residual urine; UTI: urinary tract infection. * Univariate logistic regression p < 0.05. ** Multivariate Binary logistic regression.
Table
Table 5. The subsequent BoNT-A injection cycles during the follow-up period after the first time BoNT-A injection for young and elderly patients with refractory overactive bladder.
Table 5. The subsequent BoNT-A injection cycles during the follow-up period after the first time BoNT-A injection for young and elderly patients with refractory overactive bladder.
Subsequent Injection Cycle(s)01234567
Young patients (n)84221042221
Elderly patients (n)5110310000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ou, Y.-C.; Kao, Y.-L.; Ho, Y.-H.; Wu, K.-Y.; Kuo, H.-C. Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder—Results between Young and Elderly Populations, and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes. Toxins 2023, 15, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020095

AMA Style

Ou Y-C, Kao Y-L, Ho Y-H, Wu K-Y, Kuo H-C. Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder—Results between Young and Elderly Populations, and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes. Toxins. 2023; 15(2):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ou, Yin-Chien, Yao-Lin Kao, Yi-Hui Ho, Kuan-Yu Wu, and Hann-Chorng Kuo. 2023. "Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder—Results between Young and Elderly Populations, and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes" Toxins 15, no. 2: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020095

APA Style

Ou, Y. -C., Kao, Y. -L., Ho, Y. -H., Wu, K. -Y., & Kuo, H. -C. (2023). Intravesical Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Patients with Refractory Overactive Bladder—Results between Young and Elderly Populations, and Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes. Toxins, 15(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop