Next Article in Journal
Genetic Relationships, Carbendazim Sensitivity and Mycotoxin Production of the Fusarium Graminearum Populations from Maize, Wheat and Rice in Eastern China
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence of Pre- and Post-Harvest Mycotoxins and Other Secondary Metabolites in Danish Maize Silage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 6
Issue 8
10.3390/toxins6082270
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sub-Emetic Toxicity of Bacillus cereus Toxin Cereulide on Cultured Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2 Cells

by
Andreja Rajkovic
1,*,
Charlotte Grootaert
2,
Ana Butorac
3,
Tatiana Cucu
2,
Bruno De Meulenaer
2,
John Van Camp
2,
Marc Bracke
4,
Mieke Uyttendaele
1,
Višnja Bačun-Družina
3 and
Mario Cindrić
5
1
Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Ghent University, Ghent B-9000, Belgium
2
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Human Nutrition, Ghent University, Ghent B-9000, Belgium
3
Laboratory for Biology and Microbial Genetics, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, Zagreb University, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia
4
Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent B-9000, Belgium
5
Laboratory for System Biomedicine and Centre for Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry, "Ruđer Bošković" Institute, Zagreb HR-10000, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2014, 6(8), 2270-2290; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6082270
Submission received: 2 March 2014 / Revised: 18 July 2014 / Accepted: 22 July 2014 / Published: 4 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cereulide (CER) intoxication occurs at relatively high doses of 8 µg/kg body weight. Recent research demonstrated a wide prevalence of low concentrations of CER in rice and pasta dishes. However, the impact of exposure to low doses of CER has not been studied before. In this research, we investigated the effect of low concentrations of CER on the behavior of intestinal cells using the Caco-2 cell line. The MTT (mitochondrial 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and the SRB (sulforhodamine B) reactions were used to measure the mitochondrial activity and cellular protein content, respectively. Both assays showed that differentiated Caco-2 cells were sensitive to low concentrations of CER (in a MTT reaction of 1 ng/mL after three days of treatment; in an SRB reaction of 0.125 ng/mL after three days of treatment). Cell counts revealed that cells were released from the differentiated monolayer at 0.5 ng/mL of CER. Additionally, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL of CER increased the lactate presence in the cell culture medium. Proteomic data showed that CER at a concentration of 1 ng/mL led to a significant decrease in energy managing and H2O2 detoxification proteins and to an increase in cell death markers. This is amongst the first reports to describe the influence of sub-emetic concentrations of CER on a differentiated intestinal monolayer model showing that low doses may induce an altered enterocyte metabolism and membrane integrity.

1. Introduction

Cereulide (CER) is the main virulence factor of the emetic type of foodborne pathogen, Bacillus cereus. It is a heat-, protease- and pH-stable hydrophobic dodecadepsipeptide with a molecular mass of 1.2 kDa [1,2]. It comprises three repetitions of tetrapeptide motifs synthesized by nonribosomal peptide synthesis complexes [3,4]. It is known that CER has ionophoretic activities and acts as a potassium transporter. The toxic effect of CER on mammalian cells has been shown to be a result of the disturbance of the ionic equilibrium and mitochondrial transmembrane potential, which may influence the whole organism and, eventually, even cause death [5,6,7]. In foodborne outbreaks, the main clinical manifestation of CER intoxication is emesis. Therefore, CER is referred to as an emetic toxin of B. cereus in contrast to the group of B. cereus diarrheal enterotoxins (hemolysin BL, non-hemolytic enterotoxin, cytotoxin K and some others less prevalent and putative toxins).
In general, CER is produced by less than 10% of random foodborne Bacillus cereus isolates and is mostly related to farinaceous foods [8,9,10]. In the study of Delbrassinne et al. [11], CER was found in 7.4% of randomly collected rice dishes from restaurants. The prevalence increased to 12.9% in samples subjected to temperature abuse during the storage. The CER concentrations found in samples were approximately 4 ng/g of food [11]. The prevalence of emetic B. cereus determined in 56,899 stool samples from sporadic food poisoning cases in Korea revealed that emetic B. cereus was present in 0.012% of food poisoning cases [12]. An analysis of samples originating from patients suffering from diagnosed emetic food poisoning revealed CER in high concentrations in gastric fluid (4 ng/mL), blood serum (4 ng/mL), urine (8 ng/mL) and, especially, stool (160–800 ng/g) [13].
The acute effects of gastroenteritis may be easily identified with a large number of documented food poisonings as a consequence [14,15]. However, chronic effects often result from the ingestion of low to moderate levels of toxins and can be difficult to recognize. These toxin doses do not cause immediately visible symptoms, but may have a profound effect on different health aspects [16]. Quantification and characterization of these effects using biological systems could provide the information necessary for appropriate prevention and early intervention in human health protection [17].
Because the gut is the first exposure site of CER to the human body, it is highly relevant to understand the effect of sub-emetic CER concentrations on the intestinal epithelium. Colorectal cancer cell lines are often used as in vitro models in intestinal permeability studies [18] and the investigation of the transport characteristics of food compounds and xenobiotics. Caco-2 cells spontaneously differentiate into enterocyte-like cells upon confluency [19], which results in a polarity of the cell in an apical and baso-lateral part, separated by tight junctions. On the apical part, a brush border with microvilli is developed, which produce specific digestive hydrolases, and transport proteins, enzyme receptors, ion channels and lipid molecules are also situated on the apical part [18,20,21]. Until now, a number of toxicity studies had been performed with undifferentiated Caco-2 cells, although they did not display the characteristics of enterocytes. Moreover, differentiated tumor cells resemble normal cells and tend to grow and spread at a slower rate than undifferentiated or poorly differentiated tumor cells [22,23]. The difference in the toxicological responses of undifferentiated and differentiated cell cultures have been reported, also for Caco-2 cells [24], and some of the expressed intestinal functions of fully differentiated colon cancer cell lines, cell subpopulations and clones important for enteric pathogenesis have been described [25]. Basic in vitro studies of CER toxicity have been performed using different cell lines and methods, including human HeLa, Caco-2, Calu-3, Paju cells, Hep2 and natural killer cells, as well as, boar sperm cells, porcine pancreatic islets of Langerhans [26,27,28,29], most often looking into the threshold concentration of CER provoking vacuolation effects and visible mitochondrial damage. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to establish the effect of sub-emetic concentrations of CER on differentiated Caco-2 cells using assays describing the toxicity, permeability, metabolism and proteomic profile. Such a multilateral approach comprising also the investigation of long time intestinal exposure will complement current knowledge on CER toxicity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Sub-Emetic Cereulide Concentrations on the Toxicity, Protein Content and Cell Morphology of Caco-2 Cells

In order to determine the limit of CER toxicity, well-established assays for mitochondrial activity (MTT) and changes in protein content (SRB (sulforhodamine B)) of differentiated Caco-2 cells were evaluated after an extended, three-day exposure to low concentrations of CER (Figure 1A,B).
The MTT assay showed toxicity on differentiated cells at 1 ng/mL, whereas the SRB test already showed toxicity from a concentration of 0.125 ng/mL. In general, the SRB test appeared to be more sensitive than the MTT test to detect changes in the biological activity of differentiated Caco-2 cells. These findings are in agreement with the data of Keepers et al. [30], who have shown that the SRB assay provided a better linearity with cell number and a higher sensitivity on human colorectal cell line HT-29. The potential shortcomings of the MTT assay as an indicator of cellular toxicity have been reported by several authors [30,31].
To elaborate on the results of the SRB reaction, an effect of CER on viable cell counts was investigated. For this purpose, the DAPI-stained nuclei of a differentiated Caco-2 cell monolayer treated with 0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL of CER for three days were enumerated. The results presented in Figure 2 show that CER at a concentration of 0.5 ng/mL was able to decrease the amount of adherent Caco-2 cells. In addition, the medium that was collected from differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with CER (0, 0.25 and 0.5 ng/mL) did not show any significant differences in protein content measured by the Bradford method or by quantification of the bands (stained with Coomassie blue) after 1D gel electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide gel (Quantity One) (data not shown). The decreased SRB results were due to the decrease in cell number and probably not to differences in the amount of secreted proteins.
Toxins 06 02270 g001 1024
Figure 1. (A) MTT and (B) SRB (sulforhodamine B) results for differentiated Caco-2 cells after three-day exposure to low concentrations of cereulide (CER). Error bars indicate standard deviations between six wells. Significantly different results are indicated as: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. (A) MTT and (B) SRB (sulforhodamine B) results for differentiated Caco-2 cells after three-day exposure to low concentrations of cereulide (CER). Error bars indicate standard deviations between six wells. Significantly different results are indicated as: ** p < 0.01.
Toxins 06 02270 g001
Toxins 06 02270 g002 1024
Figure 2. (A) Percentage of DAPI-stained nuclei of differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with CER (0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL) compared to the untreated condition; and (B) pictures of the DAPI-stained nuclei as observed by fluorescence microscopy. Significantly different results are indicated as: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Error bars indicate standard errors based on three wells at three technical repeats (positions) in the same well.
Figure 2. (A) Percentage of DAPI-stained nuclei of differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with CER (0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL) compared to the untreated condition; and (B) pictures of the DAPI-stained nuclei as observed by fluorescence microscopy. Significantly different results are indicated as: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Error bars indicate standard errors based on three wells at three technical repeats (positions) in the same well.
Toxins 06 02270 g002

2.2. Effect of Sub-Emetic Cereulide Concentrations on Acidification and Lactate Formation by Caco-2 Cells

A strong difference in the color of the cell culture medium was observed after three days of treatment, with color changes starting to becoming apparent at a concentration of 0.5 ng/mL and becoming clearly visible at 2 ng/mL. The stronger acidification of the medium with higher concentrations of CER may be attributed to the increased lactate concentrations in the samples (Figure 3). The correlation between lactate profile and oxidative metabolism was suggested earlier using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, pointing to a central role of mitochondria on lactate metabolism [32]. An increase in lactate production by cells might indicate a mitochondrial dysfunction that leads to a compensatory increase in the glycolytic rate.
Toxins 06 02270 g003 1024
Figure 3. Lactate content of the cell medium after three days of treatment with 0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL of CER. Error bars indicate standard deviations between three wells and two technical repeats (extractions). Significantly different results are indicated as: * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Lactate content of the cell medium after three days of treatment with 0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL of CER. Error bars indicate standard deviations between three wells and two technical repeats (extractions). Significantly different results are indicated as: * p < 0.05.
Toxins 06 02270 g003

2.3. Comparison of the Mitochondrial Effects of Sub-Emetic Cereulide Concentrations between the Caco-2 MTT Assay and the Boar Sperm Test

The motility of boar semen cells has been reported as a very sensitive and convenient bioassay to determine the presence of CER (and related) toxins [27,33,34,35]. In the present study, we compared briefly the sensitivity of Caco-2 cells and boar semen cells, and the lowest concentration of CER that had a toxic effect on boar semen was 2.5 ng/mL (data not shown), whereas the effects on differentiated Caco-2 cells occurred for 1 ng/mL for the MTT test and 0.125 ng for the SRB test. If we compare these results with other sensitive techniques, such as LC-MS, in which the detection limit is 0.5 ng/gram [36], the lowest toxic dose of CER for Caco-2 cells is a factor of four lower. Therefore, we concluded that the MTT and SRB test with differentiated Caco-2 cells are at least as interesting as the boar sperm test to detect CER, but the longer incubation time also makes it more sensitive towards the effects of other matrix compounds. In the work of Jaaskelainen et al. [28], one of the few studies that included differentiated Caco-2 cells, the lowest CER concentration that produced visible effects on a differentiated Caco-2 cell monolayer was 2 ng/mL CER, and that in a suspension Caco-2 culture was 10–20 ng of CER/mL, in comparison to 0.125 ng/mL obtained in the current study for differentiated cells. Concentrations causing toxic effects described in our study are also lower than presumed emetic concentrations, but flank lower levels of amounts reported in the food [11,28,37,38], which indicates the high relevance of the investigations of (extended) exposure to low doses of CER.

2.4. Differences in Protein Expression between Treated and Untreated Caco-2 Cells

Table 1 and Figure 4 show the proteins that are differentially expressed by untreated and treated (CER concentration of 1 ng/mL) differentiated Caco-2 cells. Figure 4A shows the differences in protein profile based on 2D gel electrophoresis, whereas Figure 4B shows the LC profile of both untreated and treated Caco-2 cells, in which differences in peak intensities can be observed mainly in the region between 30 and 40 min and between 50 and 60 min.
Data about the effect of CER or structurally similar toxins on the expression of these specific proteins in any cell type is almost non-existent. In certain cases, data about other types of microbial and environmental toxins are available, although only a few publications have characterized them in Caco-2 cells. Most of the altered proteins correspond with defense mechanisms of the cell towards toxic compounds, including TPI1, ApoA1, PGK1, cathepsin D preprotein, LDH, GST, Prdx and Rho-GDI.
As far as we know, no literature is available about the impact of microbial toxins on IGFN, domain-containing protein 1, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, malate dehydrogenase, peroxiredoxin, copine-1 and albumin. In general, CER led towards a decrease in energy managing proteins, such as proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolism [39], TPI1, PGK1 and MDH. Triosephosphate isomerase 1 is an enzyme involved in glycolysis. It is downregulated after treatment of hepatic cell lines with certain antimicrobial peptides (a role characteristic of CER, too [40]), resulting in apoptosis [41], and with deoxynivalenol [42], which is an emetic mycotoxin from Fusarium species [43], with known toxicity on gut and brain cells [44]. It has also been demonstrated that neurotoxin-like beta-carbolines, which are inhibitors of mitochondrial respiration, bind to this protein [45]. Phosphoglycerate kinase is an enzyme involved in the conversion of pyruvate to lactate and plays an important role in the multidrug resistance response when overexpressed in the human ovarian cancer cell line, SW626TR [46]. Downregulation of this enzyme was observed in mouse macrophages treated with another Bacillus toxins, namely anthrax lethal toxin [47].
Our results demonstrated the decreased presence of apolipoprotein A-I, proapolipoprotein and apolipoprotein preprotein in the cell culture medium after CER treatment, which may be due to decreased HDL secretion. Secreted HDL is directly linked to mitochondrial respiration, more specifically, HDL increases the mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis rate by skeletal muscle cells in mice [48], and mitochondrial dysfunction through membrane potential loss of nigericin- and oligomycin-treated mice macrophages results in decreased HDL secretion [49]. In addition, the toxicity sequestering effect of HDL has been demonstrated for bacterial lipopolysaccharides [50,51,52], lipoteichoic acid [53], amphotericin [54], carcinogens [55] and E. coli supernatant [56]. PCSK9 was upregulated after CER treatment, and although the impact of this modified expression is currently unknown, we assume that it may participate in the altered cholesterol metabolism after CER exposure [57].
Table
Table 1. Overview of the proteins that are differentially expressed between untreated and CER (1 ng/mL)-treated differentiated Caco-2 cells after three days of CER treatment. The change indicates the increase or decrease of the protein from the CER-treated cells compared to the untreated cells. M = medium, C = cytosol, N = membrane/nuclear protein fraction.
Table 1. Overview of the proteins that are differentially expressed between untreated and CER (1 ng/mL)-treated differentiated Caco-2 cells after three days of CER treatment. The change indicates the increase or decrease of the protein from the CER-treated cells compared to the untreated cells. M = medium, C = cytosol, N = membrane/nuclear protein fraction.
No. aFractionProteingi number bMWpI cCoverage %MASCOT scoreExpressionFunction
1M/CTriosephosphate isomerase 1 (TPI1)1738981526,6256.538145 *-Gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, pentose shunt
2MApolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I)9010866428,0625.348197 *-Lipid metabolism, major component of HDL, clear cholesterol from tissues, positive effect on cardiovascular diseases
3MApolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I)9010866428,0625.356234 *-Lipid metabolism, major component of HDL, clear cholesterol from tissues, positive effect on cardiovascular diseases
4MProapolipoprotein17877528,9445.539133 *-Lipid metabolism, major component of HDL, clear cholesterol from tissues, positive effect on cardiovascular diseases
5MApolipoprotein A-I preproprotein455732130,7455.637169 *-Lipid metabolism, major component of HDL, clear cholesterol from tissues, positive effect on cardiovascular diseases
6MImmunoglobulin-like and fibronectin type III (IGFN)257196151383,5685.73271 *-Cell adhesion (wound healing), differentiation, migration, cytokine and tyrosine kinase receptors
7MDomain-containing protein 1193783098349,0135.630101 *-unknown
8MPhosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1)4814554944,5748.325121 *-Conversion pyruvate to lactate, cellular response to extracellular stimulus
9MNucleolar protein 5A (56kDa with KKE/D repeat), isoform CRA_b11963099047,8989.42074 *-Ribosomal action
10MProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (Pcsk9)14924324374,2396.141218 *+Cholesterol homeostasis, LDL decrease => hypercholesterolemia
11MCathepsin D preproprotein450314344,5246.128118 *+Protease, ECM remodeling, CVD, apoptosis, immune response, tumor biomarker
12M/CLactate dehydrogenase (isoform CRA_a) (LDH)49259209/36,5165.925110 *+Conversion of lactate to pyruvate, marker for cell death (marker of membrane integrity)
13MDeoxyribonuclease I splicing isomer 1 (DNASE1)10980970531,3864.628115 *+Waste-management endonuclease, DNA fragmentation, apoptosis
14CTyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein (YWHA)2311428,0834.8898 **-Signal transduction, trafficking, apoptosis, stress response, and malignant transformation
15CMalate dehydrogenase (MDH), cytoplasmic isoform 3125560436,4266.9683 **-Citric acid cycle, gluconeogenesis
16CPeroxiredoxin (Prdx)28764122,1118.39102 **-Detoxification of H2O2
17CGlutathione S-transferase P (GSTP)3194623,3565.413154 **-Detoxification, oxidative stress
18CU2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 2 isoform b3754553,5019.2674 **-mRNA processing
19CCopine-1 isoform a (CPNE1)179125759,0595.5576 **+Membrane trafficking
20CGlutathione S-transferase (GST)12173025,6318.9681 **+Detoxification, oxidative stress
21CRho GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha (Rho GDI 1)3603823,1935.0779 **+Activation of the oxygen superoxide-generating NADPH oxidase
22NAlbumin, CRA p11962607969,3485.922189 *+Unknown
Notes: a Protein number. Protein numbers 1–13 (isolated from medium and separated by 2-DE) correspond spot numbers marked on 2-DE gels, Figure 2A; b GenInfo identifier in NCBInr database; c Isoelectric point; * MASCOT protein score >69 is statistically significant, based on the MASCOT scoring algorithm using a threshold of p < 0.5; ** MASCOT protein score >46 is statistically significant, based on the MASCOT scoring algorithm using a threshold of p < 0.5.
Toxins 06 02270 g004 1024
Figure 4. (A) 2D gel electrophoresis of the secreted protein fraction isolated from the cell culture medium of differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with 0 and 1 ng/mL CER for 3 days. Black circles represent protein spots that are differentially expressed. Protein spots are identified after mass spectrometry analyses and results are summarized in Table 1; (B) Protein profile of the cytosolic protein fraction of the same Caco-2 cells.
Figure 4. (A) 2D gel electrophoresis of the secreted protein fraction isolated from the cell culture medium of differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with 0 and 1 ng/mL CER for 3 days. Black circles represent protein spots that are differentially expressed. Protein spots are identified after mass spectrometry analyses and results are summarized in Table 1; (B) Protein profile of the cytosolic protein fraction of the same Caco-2 cells.
Toxins 06 02270 g004
CER treatment led towards a decrease in H2O2 detoxification proteins, Prdx and GSTP [58], and to an increase in Rho GDI protein, which regulates Rho family GTPase activities. As far as we know, no data are available about decreased Prdx levels after toxin treatment. Glutathione S-transferases (GST) comprise a family of enzymes that are critical for the inactivation of toxins and carcinogens after conjugation, such as the hepatoxin microcystin LR [59] and aflatoxin B1 in rat liver tissue [60]. Incubation of HT-29 cells with alternariol also resulted in increased GST expression and activity [61]. Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha controls Rho proteins homeostasis, which is involved in a wide variety of cellular functions, such as cell polarity, vesicular trafficking, the cell cycle and transcriptomal dynamics. Treatment of HepG2 with the contaminant di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and benzo-a-pyrene resulted in the upregulation of the Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor [62,63]. In addition, toxins from Clostridium difficile, Clostridium sordellii and Clostridium novyi inactivate proteins from the Rho family that regulate actin polymerization [64,65], leading towards changes in cell barrier permeability and disruption of intercellular junctions.
Cereulide exposure resulted also in elevated expression of cathepsin D preprotein. Extracellular release of pro-cathepsin D after exposure of Hela cells to Helicobacter pylori vacuolating toxin was demonstrated by Satin et al. [66]. This was the result of the incomplete conversion of the pro-cathepsin D to cathepsin D. Extracellular release of cathepsin D and the impact on cellular respiration was also observed after the addition of petroleum hydrocarbons [67]. This mechanism may also explain why cathepsin D levels were increased after valinomycin treatment, which is a microbial depsipeptide highly similar to CER [68]. In many cases, the cleavage of toxins by cathepsin D may increase their toxicity, such as for Pseudomonas exotoxin A [69]. Increased expression of cathepsin D was also found after LPS stimulation of microglia [70]. These results indicate the possible role of cathepsin D in apoptosis regulation after toxin treatment. The assessment of this finding should be performed, as cathepsin D is a lysosomal protease that was described to have both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic functions, depending on the cause of apoptosis and probably on the applied concentration of the cytotoxic agent.
It is interesting to note that some of the proteins, differentially expressed by differentiated Caco-2 cells after CER treatment, are also biomarkers for more cancer cell phenotypes. Increased cathepsin D activity is observed in carcinomas compared to in normal tissues and may play a role in tumor growth and metastasis [71,72]. GSTs are enzymes considered as dedifferentiation markers [73] and are also upregulated in breast cancer tissue and in the distal colon, which is the site with the highest incidence of colorectal cancer [74,75]. Furthermore, Rho-GDI has been upregulated in hepatic cancer cells [76]. Based on these results, we may carefully consider a possible role of sub-emetic levels of CER and maybe other toxins in the development of cancer. The observed increase in lactate production may contribute to the previous note, as mitochondrial oxidative stress in cancer cells drives lactate production [77]. These findings urgently require further exploration.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Cell Culture

Caco-2 (ATCC HTB37) were cultivated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with Glutamax (Gibco, Langley, OK, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Greiner Bio-One, Wemmel, Belgium), 1% non-essential amino acids, 2% penicillin/streptomycin and transferrin (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) at 10% CO2 in air. The culture medium of the cells was changed every other day. Caco-2 cells with a confluency degree of approximately 80% were subcultured to maintain their undifferentiated character and, hence, the rapid growth of the cells. During the subculturing in a T25 flask, cells were first washed with 4 mL phosphate saline buffer (PBS) without calcium and magnesium, and then, 2 mL trypsin were added to the flask. After 20 s of rinsing the cells, the overload of trypsin was removed until 1 droplet was still in the flask, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. Finally, the cells were suspended in 5 mL of medium and distributed in the new T25 flask at a splitting ratio of 1 to 5. Caco-2 cells were grown to 95% confluency in T25 culture flasks for continuous subcultivation of the cells, whereas differentiated Caco-2 cells were obtained by extended culturing of 21 days, as reported earlier [78,79]. The cell morphology was analyzed by phase-contrast microscopy (Leica DMI3000 B, Leica, Solms, Germany) equipped with a camera (Leica DFC420C, Leica, Solms, Germany).

3.2. Cereulide (CER)

Cereulide, kindly provided by Dr. Paul in’t Veld (Netherlands Food and Safety Authority), was originally synthesized from tert-butyl carbonate (Boc)-D-Ala-OH, H-L-O-Val-OBn (where Bn is a benzyl moiety), Boc-L-Val-OH and H-L-O-Leu-OBn by Chiralix B.V., (Nijmegen, The Netherlands), as described elsewhere [80]. The working stock of 50 ng/µL was used to make appropriate working dilutions in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in the range of 0–2 ng/mL.

3.3. Toxicity Tests

The effect of CER on Caco-2 cells was characterized with two established assays. The MTT assay ((3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was used to measure the mitochondrial activity, as described by the protocol of Mosmann [81]. The SRB assay (sulforhodamine B) was used for the measurement of cellular protein content, according to Vichai and Kirtikara [82]. For the toxicity assay, cells were trypsinized, counted according to the Trypan blue staining method with a Bürker counting chamber, and seeded at a concentration of 40,000 cells per well in a 96-well plate. To determine CER toxicity on undifferentiated Caco-2 cells, the treatment was applied one day after seeding the cells, whereas for differentiated cells, the treatment was applied after 21 days. MTT and SRB reactions were measured one and three days after the CER treatment. Six biological repeats were made for each CER concentration in each of the MTT and SRB toxicity tests. The cells were treated with CER for three days to mimic an extended exposure time.
An additional toxicity evaluation was done using a computer-aided boar semen bio-assay in which the effect of tested concentrations of CER on boar semen motility was evaluated. The assay was performed as described previously [1,34], with the modification that DMSO was used as a negative control and that the exposure time was 20 min. The indication of acute toxicity was a complete cease of semen motility within the 20 min of exposure. The blank sample (semen exposed to DMSO) served as an exposure control (no cease in motility for 20 min). The assay was performed in duplicate.
To complement the SRB results and see whether CER treatment affected the cell number, Caco-2 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates at a concentration of 100,000 cells per well, allowed to differentiate for 21 days and then exposed to 0, 0.062, 0.5 and 2 ng/mL of CER in serum-free medium. After the exposure, the cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6′-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a concentration of 1 μg/mL. Per biological repeat (3 per concentration), the amount of cells per camera snapshot of the monolayer at 3 random places in the well (upper left, middle and lower right part) were counted. Images of stained cells were obtained with a Leica DMR microscope equipped with a fluorescence imaging system (100× magnification).

3.4. Lactate Analysis

Lactate extraction was performed by mixing 1 mL of cell culture medium with 4.5 mL of water and 0.5 mL of an internal standard solution (phenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, 0.8 mg/mL water). The solution was shaken for 15 minutes and filtered (nitrogen free filter, 595 ½, diameter of 185 mm, SCHLEICHER & SCHUELL, Dassel, Germany). A volume of 500 µL was retained; 10 µL of a 3M NaOH solution were added, and the sample was dried under nitrogen. The dry residue was derivatized to trimethylsilyl esters using 400 µL of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide, 50 µL of trimethylchlorosilane and 500 µL of pyridine. Analyses were carried out using a Varian 3380 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame-ionization detector (Varian Instrument Group, Walnut Creek, CA, USA). The chromatographic parameters were: stationary phase, (5%-phenyl)-methylpolysiloxane; film thickness, 0.25 µm; 30 m × 0.32 mm inside diameter (i.d.) (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA); mobile phase, He at 1 mL/min, split 1/40; injector temperature, 250 °C; detector temperature, 340 °C; injection volume, 1 µL; column temperature program, 60 °C for 5 min, ramp at 10 °C/min to 290 °C, then isothermic for 10 min. The flame ionization detector was operated with hydrogen and air at respectively 30 and 300 mL/min and helium at 20 mL/min as makeup gas.

3.5. Preparation of Protein Fractions for Proteomics

For the proteomics experiment, cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a concentration of 100,000 cells per well and allowed to differentiate for 21 days. Prior to CER treatment (0 and 2 µg/mL in serum-free medium), cells were washed trice with serum-free medium.

3.5.1. Secreted Protein Fraction

After CER exposure, the Caco-2-containing culture medium of the T25 culture flask was centrifuged (1000× g, 10 min), and the supernatant was transferred through a 0.22-µm sterile filter (Millipore). The medium was then concentrated by ultrafiltration (10 kD filter; Millipore, 40 min, 2000× g), until approximately 250 µL of retentate were obtained. Small variations in the final volume were adjusted to an equal volume by adding sterile PBS. Secreted proteins were precipitated after the addition of an aqueous 7.5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution (w/v), as described by Chevallet et al. [83]. After protein precipitation, the pellet was dissolved in 0.35 mL of isoelectric focusing (IEF) buffer. The buffer was prepared by dissolving 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS in water (w/v).

3.5.2. Cytosolic Protein Fraction

Caco-2 cells were washed and treated with 1 mL of mild lysis buffer, containing 1% Triton X-100 and 1% NP-40 in Ca2+/Mg2+ supplemented PBS (v/v), as well as protease inhibitors (2 M phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride), 10 mg/L leupeptin, 10 mg/L apoprotinin, 1 mM NaVO3, 2.5 g/L Na4P2O7 and 0.1 mM NaF). The lysate was centrifuged (10 min, 14,000× g), and the supernatant was retained as the cytosolic protein fraction.

3.5.3. Nuclear/Membrane-Bound Protein Fraction

The pellet obtained after lysate centrifugation of the above-described procedure was dissolved in 250 µL Laemmli 1× lysis solution (0.125 M Tris-HCl,123 g/L glycerol, and 23 g/L SDS), sonicated for 10 s and centrifuged (14,000× g, 10 min).

3.6. 1D and 2D Gel Electrophoresis

The secreted protein fraction was separated by 2-DE [84]. In the first dimension, the linear immobilized pH gradient strips (17 cm, pH 3–10) were used, and IEF was carried out with a Bio-Rad Protean IEF Cell (Hemel Hempstead, UK). The second dimension, SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was run through 1 mm-thick 12% polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were visualized by silver staining.
Differential display analysis of 2-DE gel data sets was obtained by comparing images of three control gels and three gels of CER-treated samples. Master gels were used to obtain the differences between protein profiles of control and CER-treated cells. Densitometry analysis was performed with image analysis software (Discovery Series PDQuest 2-DE analysis software package version 7.4.0 [85]) integrated into a VersaDoc 4000 Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK).
The nuclear/membrane-bound protein fraction was separated by 1D SDS-PAGE, to avoid coating the charge of the proteins by negatively-charged SDS, through 12% polyacrylamide gel and then visualized by Coomassie blue staining [86]. Three control and three CER-treated gels were used.
All reagents used for protein preparations were of electrophoresis grade and were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hertfordshire, UK), and all protein preparations were stored at −20 °C until analysis.

In-Gel Digestion

All visible spots obtained after Coomassie staining (1-DE gels) and differentially displayed protein spots obtained after silver staining (2-DE gels) were excised and subjected to tryptic in-gel digestion in accordance with the procedure described elsewhere [87]. After digestion, the extracted peptides were purified with C4 ZipTip columns (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and evaporated to dryness in SpeedVac (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Dried samples were mixed with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) 1:5, v/v (5 mg/mL; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and spotted onto a metal MALDI plate.

3.7. Cap-LC

Cytosolic protein fractions were purified by Sep-Pak Vac 1cc Diol Cartridges using a vacuum manifold solid phase extraction system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Diol cartridges were conditioned in three steps: firstly by aspirating and dispensing to waste three times 0.5 mL of 80% acetonitrile (ACN) mixed with 20% water solution of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (v/v), secondly by 50% ACN mixed with 50% water solution of 0.1% TFA (v/v) and, finally, by an aqueous solution of 0.1% TFA (v/v). The protein sample solution was loaded onto the cartridge and washed five times with 0.5 mL aqueous solution of 0.1% TFA (v/v). Proteins were eluted from the column with 0.35 mL of 80% ACN mixed with 20% aqueous solution of 0.1% TFA (v/v). The eluting solution was evaporated to dryness in a SpeedVac (Eppendorf, Germany), then proteins were reconstituted in 0.1 mL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 (pH 7.3) and subjected to tryptic digestion (final concentration of 20 µg/mL) for 18 h at 37 °C.
The CapLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a UV/VIS detector coupled to Tempo™ LC MALDI spotter (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for peptide separation and collection directly onto the MALDI plate. Chromatographic separation was performed on a silica based Symmetry 300™ C18 column (300 µm × 150 µm I.D., 3.5-μm particle size, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at 30 °C. The flow rate was 2 µL/min, and the injection volume was 10 μL. Vial temperature was maintained at 5 °C in the autosampler tray. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% TFA aqueous solution and mobile phase B consisted of 80% ACN mixed with 20% aqueous solution of 0.1% TFA (v/v). Eluted peptides were detected by UV absorbance at 280 nm. The 100-min gradient elution was programmed to increase over 70 min with Solvent B from 5% to 80% and then to condition the column back to the initial conditions until the completion of the run. The spotter make-up flow was set to 2 μL/min (5 mg CHCA matrix dissolved in 1 mL of 50% ACN aqueous solution).
Duplicate injections were acquired for three CER-treated and three control samples.

3.8. Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry acquisition (MS) was performed with a MALDI TOF/TOF 4800 Plus analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with a 200-Hz, 355-nm Nd:YAG laser. Acquisitions were performed in positive ion reflectron mode. The instrument parameters were set using the 4000 Series Explorer software, version 3.5.3 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Mass spectra were obtained by averaging 1800 laser shots covering a mass range m/z 800–4000. Internal calibration and external calibration of the mass range were performed with tryptic autolysis fragments for in-gel and LC samples, respectively. After the recording of the MS spectra of the secreted protein fraction (2-DE gels), ten of the most intensive precursor signals were selected for MS/MS analysis. MS/MS analysis was achieved under 1 kV collision energy in positive ion mode with air used as a collision gas. The differential display analysis performed in the nuclear/membrane-bound protein fraction (1-DE gel) was based on a comparison of peptide ion masses between control and treated samples (presence/absence) in MS spectra according to the protein migration position in the gel. A cytosolic protein fraction differential display (Cap-LC fractions) was performed in accordance with the peptide retention time and spot position obtained after chromatographic elution. MS/MS spectra were achieved only for peptide ions that were found as differentially expressed (the limit was 10 S/N in MS spectrum).

3.9. Protein Identification

Protein identification and database searching was performed by GPS Explorer Software v3.6 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). A combined ion search using MS and MS/MS data were matched against the NCBInr by MASCOT search engine [88]. The parameters were set as follows: two missed trypsin cleavages and oxidation of methionine with 21 ppm mass tolerance.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

Mean values and corresponding standard deviations and coefficients of variance of six-times-repeated SRB and MTT reactions were computed for each test condition. The statistical significance of the observed differences between tested conditions were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (Chicago, IL, USA). In the first step, the normality of the data were investigated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. To determine whether the data were significantly different (p < 0.05, indicated with *, and p < 0.01, indicated with **), a t-test (two-tailed with unequal variance) was applied.

4. Conclusions

While acute doses of CER are found in foods and cause a large number of documented food poisonings, the remaining question of scientific and public health relevance is the prevalence and the effect of sub(acute)-doses [17]. These CER doses do not cause immediately visible symptoms, but may have profound effects on different health aspects. The results of current study support this hypothesis, and show that the lowest toxic dose of CER for non-differentiated Caco-2 cells is 0.062 ng/mL and 0.125 ng/mL for differentiated Caco-2 cells. The impact on differentiated cells, a more relevant epithelium model, was noticeable using different toxicity markers and the proteomic profile of treated cells.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO—Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen) and was performed in the framework of personal FWO mandate of Andreja Rajkovic under the project titles “Combined exposure to (sub)clinical concentrations of foodborne bacterial toxins” and “Synthetic antibodies (SynAbs) based platform for detection, effect characterization and neutralization of microbial toxins”. The authors wish additionally to thank the Federation of European Microbiological Societies, FEMS, for the exchange scholarship provided to Ana Butorac and Ghent University for granting Special Research Fund—Concerted Research Actions grant (BOF 13/GOA/022) coordinated by Annemieke Madder in which among the (co)promoters are Mieke Uyttendaele and Andreja Rajkovic, and under which a part of the research was performed.

Author Contributions

Andreja Rajkovic as a principal investigator wrote a Research Foundation Flanders project behind this microbial toxins research providing scientific rationale and core investigation lines. Together with Charlotte Grootaert and Ana Butorac specific and detailed research plan was designed, that was verified by all co-authors. The main laboratory work was done by Ana Butorac, Charlotte Grootaert, and Andreja Rajkovic. Tatiana Cucu, Bruno De Meulenaer and John van Camp contributed with infrastructure, expertise and work in part of chemical analysis, including lactate analysis. Marck Bracke provided infrastructure and advice in cell line work. Mieke Uyttendale as a project promoter contributed to the original research concept and the experimental setup written in the project. Višnja Bačun-Družina and Mario Cindrić provided infrastructure and advice in the proteomic part of research. The main role in writing the manuscript was with Andreja Rajkovic, greatly complemented by Charlotte Grootaert and Ana Butorac. All co-authors participated in data analysis, discussion, and proofreading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rajkovic, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Vermeulen, A.; Andjelkovic, M.; Fitz-James, I.; in’t Veld, P.; Denon, Q.; Verhe, R.; Debevere, J. Heat resistance of bacillus cereus emetic toxin, cereulide. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Suwan, S.; Isobe, M.; Ohtani, I.; Agata, N.; Mori, M.; Ohta, M. Structure of cereulide, a cyclic dodecadepsipeptide toxin from bacillus cereus and studies on nmr characteristics of its alkali-metal complexes including a conformational structure of the k+ complex. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1995, 765–775. [Google Scholar]
  3. Horwood, P.F.; Burgess, G.W.; Oakey, H.J. Evidence for non-ribosomal peptide synthetase production of cereulide (the emetic toxin) in bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 236, 319–324. [Google Scholar]
  4. Toh, M.; Moffitt, M.C.; Henrichsen, L.; Raftery, M.; Barrow, K.; Cox, J.M.; Marquis, C.P.; Neilan, B.A. Cereulide, the emetic toxin of bacillus cereus, is putatively a product of nonribosomal peptide synthesis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Naranjo, M.; Denayer, S.; Botteldoorn, N.; Delbrassinne, L.; Veys, J.; Waegenaere, J.; Sirtaine, N.; Driesen, R.B.; Sipido, K.R.; Mahillon, J.; et al. Sudden death of a young adult associated with bacillus cereus food poisoning. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 4379–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dierick, K.; van Coillie, E.; Swiecicka, I.; Meyfroidt, G.; Devlieger, H.; Meulemans, A.; Hoedemaekers, G.; Fourie, L.; Heyndrickx, M.; Mahillon, J. Fatal family outbreak of bacillus cereus-associated food poisoning. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4277–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahler, H.; Pasi, A.; Kramer, J.M.; Schulte, P.; Scoging, A.C.; Bar, W.; Krahenbuhl, S. Fulminant liver failure in association with the emetic toxin of bacillus cereus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1142–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Messelhausser, U.; Kampf, P.; Fricker, M.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Zucker, R.; Wagner, B.; Busch, U.; Holler, C. Prevalence of emetic bacillus cereus in different ice creams in bavaria. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceuppens, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Heyndrickx, M.; Tsilia, V.; de Wiele, T.V.; Boon, N.; Uyttendaele, M. Regulation of toxin production by bacillus cereus and its food safety implications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 188–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wijnands, L.M.; Dufrenne, J.B.; Rombouts, F.M.; in’t Veld, P.H.; van Leusden, F.M. Prevalence of potentially pathogenic bacillus cereus in food commodities in the netherlands. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 2587–2594. [Google Scholar]
  11. Delbrassinne, L.; Andjelkovic, M.; Dierick, K.; Denayer, S.; Mahillon, J.; van Loco, J. Prevalence and levels of bacillus cereus emetic toxin in rice dishes randomly collected from restaurants and comparison with the levels measured in a recent foodborne outbreak. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2012, 9, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chon, J.W.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.J.; Hyeon, J.Y.; Song, K.Y.; Park, C.; Seo, K.H. Prevalence, phenotypic traits and molecular characterization of emetic toxin-producing bacillus cereus strains isolated from human stools in korea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shiota, M.; Saitou, K.; Mizumoto, H.; Matsusaka, M.; Agata, N.; Nakayama, M.; Kage, M.; Tatsumi, S.; Okamoto, A.; Yamaguchi, S.; et al. Rapid detoxification of cereulide in bacillus cereus food poisoning. Pediatrics 2010, 125, E951–E955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific report of efsa and ecdc: The european union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2597. [Google Scholar]
  15. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific report of efsa and ecdc: The european union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2009. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2090. [Google Scholar]
  16. Siddiki, K.F.; Blackburn, S.A. Food poisoning. In Food and famine in the 21st century; Dando, W.A., Ed.; ABC-CLIO, LLC: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rajkovic, A. Microbial toxins and low level of foodborne exposure. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 38, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hidalgo, I.J.; Raub, T.J.; Borchardt, R.T. Characterization of the human-colon carcinoma cell-line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 1989, 96, 736–749. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chantret, I.; Barbat, A.; Dussaulx, E.; Brattain, M.G.; Zweibaum, A. Epithelial polarity, villin expression, and enterocytic differentiation of cultured human-colon carcinoma-cells—A survey of 20 cell-lines. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 1936–1942. [Google Scholar]
  20. Neutra, M.; Louvard, A. Differentiation of intestinal cells in vitro. In Modern Cell Biology: Functional Epithelial Cells in Culture; Martlin, K.S., Ed.; Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pinto, M.; Robineleon, S.; Appay, M.D.; Kedinger, M.; Triadou, N.; Dussaulx, E.; Lacroix, B.; Simonassmann, P.; Haffen, K.; Fogh, J.; et al. Enterocyte-like differentiation and polarization of the human-colon carcinoma cell-line Caco-2 in culture. Biol. Cell 1983, 47, 323–330. [Google Scholar]
  22. Richards, I. Principles and Practice of Toxicology in Public Health; Jones and Bartlett Publishers International: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alschuler, L.N.G.; Gazella, K.A. The Definitive Guide to Cancer, 3rd ed.; The Crown Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Puerto, M.; Pichardo, S.; Jos, A.; Camean, A.M. Comparison of the toxicity induced by microcystin-rr and microcystin-yr in differentiated and undifferentiated caco-2 cells. Toxicon 2009, 54, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moal, V.L.L.; Servin, A.L. Pathogenesis of human enterovirulent bacteria: Lessons from cultured, fully differentiated human colon cancer cell lines. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 380–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Virtanen, S.M.; Roivainen, M.; Andersson, M.A.; Ylipaasto, P.; Hoornstra, D.; Mikkola, R.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. In vitro toxicity of cereulide on porcine pancreatic langerhans islets. Toxicon 2008, 51, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Andersson, M.A.; Hakulinen, P.; Honkalampi-Hamalainen, U.; Hoornstra, D.; Lhuguenot, J.C.; Maki-Paakkanen, J.; Savolainen, M.; Severin, I.; Stammati, A.L.; Turco, L.; et al. Toxicological profile of cereulide, the bacillus cereus emetic toxin, in functional assays with human, animal and bacterial cells. Toxicon 2007, 49, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jaaskelainen, E.L.; Teplova, V.; Andersson, M.A.; Andersson, L.C.; Tammela, P.; Andersson, M.C.; Pirhonen, T.I.; Saris, N.E.L.; Vuorela, P.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. In vitro assay for human toxicity of cereulide, the emetic mitochondrial toxin produced by food poisoning bacillus cereus. Toxicol. In Vitro 2003, 17, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Isobe, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Suwan, S.; Agata, N.; Ohta, M. Synthesis and activity of cereulide, a cyclic dodecadepsipeptide ionophore as emetic toxin from bacillus cereus. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 2855–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keepers, Y.P.; Pizao, P.E.; Peters, G.J.; Vanarkotte, J.; Winograd, B.; Pinedo, H.M. Comparison of the sulforhodamine-b protein and tetrazolium (mtt) assays for invitro chemosensitivity testing. Eur. J. Cancer 1991, 27, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shappell, N.W. Ergovaline toxicity on caco-2 cells as assessed by mtt, alamarblue, and DNA assays. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2003, 39, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zagari, F.; Jordan, M.; Stettler, M.; Broly, H.; Wurm, F.M. Lactate metabolism shift in cho cell culture: The role of mitochondrial oxidative activity. New Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andersson, M.A.; Mikkola, R.; Rasimus, S.; Hoornstra, D.; Salin, P.; Rahkila, R.; Heikkinen, M.; Mattila, S.; Peltola, J.; Kalso, S.; et al. Boar spermatozoa as a biosensor for detecting toxic substances in indoor dust and aerosols. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rajkovic, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Debevere, J. Computer aided boar semen motility analysis for cereulide detection in different food matrices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rajkovic, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Deley, W.; van Soom, A.; Rijsselaere, T.; Debevere, J. Dynamics of boar semen motility inhibition as a semi-quantitative measurement of bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide). J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 65, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Delbrassinne, L.; Andjelkovic, M.; Rajkovic, A.; Dubois, P.; Nguessan, E.; Mahillon, J.; Van Loco, J. Determination of bacillus cereus emetic toxin in food products by means of lc-msa(2). Food Anal. Method 2012, 5, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rajkovic, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Ombregt, S.A.; Jaaskelainen, E.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Debevere, J. Influence of type of food on the kinetics and overall production of bacillus cereus emetic toxin. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 847–852. [Google Scholar]
  38. Delbrassinne, L.; Andjelkovic, M.; Rajkovic, A.; Bottledoorn, N.; Mahillon, J.; van Loco, J. Follow-up of the bacillus cereus emetic toxin production in penne pasta under household conditions using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 1105–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bouchoux, J.; Beilstein, F.; Pauquai, T.; Guerrera, I.C.; Chateau, D.; Ly, N.; Alqub, M.; Klein, C.; Chambaz, J.; Rousset, M.; et al. The proteome of cytosolic lipid droplets isolated from differentiated Caco-2/tc7 enterocytes reveals cell-specific characteristics. Biol. Cell 2011, 103, 499–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tempelaars, M.H.; Rodrigues, S.; Abee, T. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial activities of valinomycin and cereulide, the bacillus cereus emetic toxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2755–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.L.S.; Li, J.H.; Yu, C.Y.; Lin, C.J.; Chiu, P.H.; Chen, P.W.; Lin, C.C.; Chen, W.J. Novel cationic antimicrobial peptide gw-h1 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Peptides 2012, 36, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Da Costa, A.N.; Mijal, R.S.; Keen, J.N.; Findlay, J.B.C.; Wild, C.P. Proteomic analysis of the effects of the immunomodulatory mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1903–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Razafimanjato, H.; Benzaria, A.; Taieb, N.; Guo, X.J.; Vidal, N.; Di Scala, C.; Varini, K.; Maresca, M. The ribotoxin deoxynivalenol affects the viability and functions of glial cells. Glia 2011, 59, 1672–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maresca, M. From the gut to the brain: Journey and pathophysiological effects of the food-associated trichothecene mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. Toxins 2013, 5, 784–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bonnet, R.; Pavlovic, S.; Lehmann, J.; Rommelspacher, H. The strong inhibition of triosephosphate isomerase by the natural beta-carbolines may explain their neurotoxic actions. Neuroscience 2004, 127, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Duan, Z.; Lamendola, D.E.; Yusuf, R.Z.; Penson, R.T.; Preffer, F.I.; Seiden, M.V. Overexpression of human phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) induces a multidrug resistance phenotype. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22, 1933–1941. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chandra, H.; Gupta, P.K.; Sharma, K.; Mattoo, A.R.; Garg, S.K.; Gade, W.N.; Sirdeshmukh, R.; Maithal, K.; Singh, Y. Proteome analysis of mouse macrophages treated with anthrax lethal toxin. Bba Proteins Proteom 2005, 1747, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lehti, M.; Donelan, E.; Abplanalp, W.; Al-Massadi, O.; Habegger, K.M.; Weber, J.; Ress, C.; Mansfeld, J.; Somvanshi, S.; Trivedi, C.; et al. High-density lipoprotein maintains skeletal muscle function by modulating cellular respiration in mice. Circulation 2013, 128, 2364–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Allen, A.M.; Graham, A. Mitochondrial function is involved in regulation of cholesterol efflux to apolipoprotein (apo)A-I from murine RAW 264.7 macrophages. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Suzuki, M.M.; Matsumoto, M.; Omi, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Nakamura, A.; Kishi, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Takagi, T. Interaction of peptide-bound beads with lipopolysaccharide and lipoproteins. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 100, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Henning, M.F.; Herlax, V.; Bakás, L. Contribution of the c-terminal end of apolipoprotein ai to neutralization of lipopolysaccharide endotoxic effect. Innate Immun. 2011, 17, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, J.; Liao, X.-L.; Lou, B.; Wu, M.-P. Role of apolipoprotein A-I in protecting against endotoxin toxicity. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2004, 36, 419–424. [Google Scholar]
  53. Jiao, Y.-L.; Wu, M.-P. Apolipoprotein A-I diminishes acute lung injury and sepsis in mice induced by lipoteichoic acid. Cytokine 2008, 43, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wasan, K.M.; Morton, R.E.; Rosenblum, M.G.; Lopez-Berestein, G. Decreased toxicity of liposomal amphotericin B due to association of amphotericin B with high-density lipoproteins: Role of lipid transfer protein. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 1006–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Contag, B. Epigenetic effectiveness of complete carcinogens: Specific interactions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aminoazo dyes with cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I. Z. Naturforsch. C 2005, 60, 799–806. [Google Scholar]
  56. Thaveeratitham, P.; Plengpanich, W.; Naen-Udorn, W.; Patumraj, S.; Khovidhunkit, W. Effects of human apolipoprotein A-I on endotoxin-induced leukocyte adhesion on endothelial cells in vivo and on the growth of escherichia coli in vitro. J. Endotoxin Res. 2007, 13, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stein, E.A.; Honarpour, N.; Wasserman, S.M.; Xu, F.; Scott, R.; Raal, F.J. Effect of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 monoclonal antibody, AMG 145, in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 2013, 128, 2113–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Johnson, R.M.; Ho, Y.S.; Yu, D.Y.; Kuypers, F.A.; Ravindranath, Y.; Goyette, G.W. The effects of disruption of genes for peroxiredoxin-2, glutathione peroxidase-1, and catalase on erythrocyte oxidative metabolism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Buratti, F.M.; Scardala, S.; Funari, E.; Testai, E. Human glutathione transferases catalyzing the conjugation of the hepatoxin microcystin-lr. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fatemi, F.; Allameh, A.; Dadkhah, A.; Forouzandeh, M.; Kazemnejad, S.; Sharifi, R. Changes in hepatic cytosolic glutathione s-transferase activity and expression of its class-p during prenatal and postnatal period in rats treated with aflatoxin b1. Arch. Toxicol. 2006, 80, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tiessen, C.; Fehr, M.; Schwarz, C.; Baechler, S.; Domnanich, K.; Böttler, U.; Pahlke, G.; Marko, D. Modulation of the cellular redox status by the alternaria toxins alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 216, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Choi, S.; Park, S.-Y.; Jeong, J.; Cho, E.; Phark, S.; Lee, M.; Kwak, D.; Lim, J.-Y.; Jung, W.-W.; Sul, D. Identification of toxicological biomarkers of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in proteins secreted by HEPG2 cells using proteomic analysis. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1831–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roh, T.; Kwak, M.Y.; Kwak, E.H.; Kim, D.H.; Han, E.Y.; Bae, J.Y.; Bang, D.Y.; Lim, D.S.; Ahn, I.Y.; Jang, D.E.; et al. Chemopreventive mechanisms of methionine on inhibition of benzo(a)pyrene–DNA adducts formation in human hepatocellular carcinoma hepg2 cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 208, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aktories, K.; Schwan, C.; Papatheodorou, P.; Lang, A.E. Bidirectional attack on the actin cytoskeleton. Bacterial protein toxins causing polymerization or depolymerization of actin. Toxicon 2012, 60, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Barbieri, J.T.; Riese, M.J.; Aktories, K. Bacterial toxins that modify the actin cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2002, 18, 315–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Satin, B.; Norais, N.; Rappuoli, R.; Telford, J.; Murgia, M.; Montecucco, C.; Papini, E. Effect of helicobacter pylori vacuolating toxin on maturation and extracellular release of procathepsin d and on epidermal growth factor degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 25022–25028. [Google Scholar]
  67. Suleiman, S.A. Petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity in vitro: Effect of n-alkanes, benzene and toluene on pulmonary alveolar macrophages and lysosomal enzymes of the lung. Arch. Toxicol. 1987, 59, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yamada, A.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, N.; Yamashita, K.; Kataoka, M.; Nagata, T.; Terada, H.; Shinohara, Y. Differential permeabilization effects of Ca2+ and valinomycin on the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes as revealed by proteomics analysis of proteins released from mitochondria. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 1265–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El Hage, T.; Lorin, S.; Decottignies, P.; Djavaheri-Mergny, M.; Authier, F. Proteolysis of pseudomonas exotoxin A within hepatic endosomes by cathepsins B and D produces fragments displaying in vitro ADP-ribosylating and apoptotic effects. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 3735–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, S.; Ock, J.; Kim, A.K.; Lee, H.W.; Cho, J.-Y.; Kim, D.R.; Park, J.-Y.; Suk, K. Neurotoxicity of microglial cathepsin D revealed by secretome analysis. J Neurochem. 2007, 103, 2640–2650. [Google Scholar]
  71. Metaye, T.; Kraimps, J.L.; Goujon, J.M.; Fernandez, B.; Quellard, N.; Ingrand, P.; Barbier, J.; Begon, F. Expression, localization, and thyrotropin regulation of cathepsin d in human thyroid tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 3383–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lah, T.T.; Kalman, E.; Najjar, D.; Gorodetsky, E.; Brennan, P.; Somers, R.; Daskal, I. Cells producing cathepsins D, B, and L in human breast carcinoma and their association with prognosis. Hum. Pathol. 2000, 31, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Grant, M.H.; Rodgers, E.H.; Anderson, K.; Haydon, G.H.; Hayes, P.C. The effect of serum from liver cancer patients on the growth and function of primary and immortalised hepatocytes. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2001, 24, 807–813. [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, J.; Zhang, D.; Jefferson, P.A.; Ward, K.M.; Ayene, I.S. A bioactive probe for glutathione-dependent antioxidant capacity in breast cancer patients: Implications in measuring biological effects of arsenic compounds. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2014, 69, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hoensch, H.; Peters, W.H.M.; Roelofs, H.M.J.; Kirch, W. Expression of the glutathione enzyme systemof human colon mucosa by localisation, gender and age. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006, 22, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fella, K.; Glückmann, M.; Hellmann, J.; Karas, M.; Kramer, P.-J.; Kröger, M. Use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in predictive toxicology: Identification of potential early protein biomarkers in chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Proteomics 2005, 5, 1914–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Balliet, R.M.; Capparelli, C.; Guido, C.; Pestell, T.G.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.E.; Lin, Z.; Whitaker-Menezes, D.; Chiavarina, B.; Pestell, R.G.; Howell, A.; et al. Mitochondrial oxidative stress in cancer-associated fibroblasts drives lactate production, promoting breast cancer tumor growth understanding the aging and cancer connection. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 4065–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Natoli, M.; Leoni, B.D.; D’Agnano, I.; D’Onofrio, M.; Brandi, R.; Arisi, I.; Zucco, F.; Felsani, A. Cell growing density affects the structural and functional properties of Caco-2 differentiated monolayer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 1531–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Natoli, M.; Leoni, B.D.; D’Agnano, I.; Zucco, F.; Felsani, A. Good Caco-2 cell culture practices. Toxicol. In Vitro 2012, 26, 1243–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Biesta-Peters, E.G.; Reij, M.W.; Blaauw, R.H.; in’t Veld, P.H.; Rajkovic, A.; Ehling-Schulz, M.; Abee, T. Quantification of the emetic toxin cereulide in food products by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using synthetic cereulide as a standard. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7466–7472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vichai, V.; Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 1112–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chevallet, M.; Diemer, H.; van Dorssealer, A.; Villiers, C.; Rabilloud, T. Toward a better analysis of secreted proteins: The example of the myeloid cells secretome. Proteomics 2007, 7, 1757–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. O’Farrell, P.H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4007–4021. [Google Scholar]
  85. Anon. PDQuest. Bio-Rad Laboratories. Available online: http://www.bio-rad.com/LifeScience/pdf/DiscoverySeries/PDQuest_v74.pdf (accessed on 24 July 2014).
  86. Laemmli, U. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage t4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shevchenko, A.; Wilm, M.; Vorm, O.; Mann, M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 850–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Perkins, D.N.; Pappin, D.J.C.; Creasy, D.M.; Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rajkovic, A.; Grootaert, C.; Butorac, A.; Cucu, T.; De Meulenaer, B.; Van Camp, J.; Bracke, M.; Uyttendaele, M.; Bačun-Družina, V.; Cindrić, M. Sub-Emetic Toxicity of Bacillus cereus Toxin Cereulide on Cultured Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2 Cells. Toxins 2014, 6, 2270-2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6082270

AMA Style

Rajkovic A, Grootaert C, Butorac A, Cucu T, De Meulenaer B, Van Camp J, Bracke M, Uyttendaele M, Bačun-Družina V, Cindrić M. Sub-Emetic Toxicity of Bacillus cereus Toxin Cereulide on Cultured Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2 Cells. Toxins. 2014; 6(8):2270-2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6082270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rajkovic, Andreja, Charlotte Grootaert, Ana Butorac, Tatiana Cucu, Bruno De Meulenaer, John Van Camp, Marc Bracke, Mieke Uyttendaele, Višnja Bačun-Družina, and Mario Cindrić. 2014. "Sub-Emetic Toxicity of Bacillus cereus Toxin Cereulide on Cultured Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2 Cells" Toxins 6, no. 8: 2270-2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6082270

APA Style

Rajkovic, A., Grootaert, C., Butorac, A., Cucu, T., De Meulenaer, B., Van Camp, J., Bracke, M., Uyttendaele, M., Bačun-Družina, V., & Cindrić, M. (2014). Sub-Emetic Toxicity of Bacillus cereus Toxin Cereulide on Cultured Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2 Cells. Toxins, 6(8), 2270-2290. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6082270

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop