Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Cavitation Characteristics of Nano-Fluid and Deionized Water in Micro-Channels
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Microfluidics for Single Bacteria Capture and Selective Retrieval Using Optical Tweezers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/mi11030309
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 Ternary Heterojunction: Superhydrophilic Properties, Antireflection and Photocatalytic Properties

by
Huan Huan
1,†,
Huge Jile
2,†,
Yijun Tang
3,
Xin Li
1,
Zao Yi
1,*,
Xiang Gao
1,*,
Xifang Chen
1,
Jian Chen
1 and
Pinghui Wu
4,*
1
Joint Laboratory for Extreme Conditions Matter Properties, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
School of Science, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
3
College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
4
Research Center for Photonic Technology, Fujian Key Laboratory for Advanced Micro-nano Photonics Technology and Devices & Key Laboratory of Information Functional Material for Fujian Higher Education, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally to this article.
Micromachines 2020, 11(3), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030309
Submission received: 3 February 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 12 March 2020 / Published: 15 March 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A ZnO seed layer was formed on the fluorine-doped tin oxide substrate by magnetron sputtering, and then a ZnO nanorod was grown on the ZnO seed layer by a hydrothermal method. Next, we prepared a single-crystal Ag seed layer by magnetron sputtering to form a ZnO@Ag composite heterostructure. Finally, Ag3PO4 crystals were grown on the Ag seed layer by a stepwise deposition method to obtain a ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 ternary heterojunction. The composite heterostructure of the material has super strong hydrophilicity and can be combined with water-soluble pollutants very well. Besides, it has excellent anti-reflection performance, which can absorb light from all angles. When Ag exists in the heterojunction, it can effectively improve the separation of photo-generated electrons and holes, and improve the photoelectric conversion performance. Based on the above characteristics, this nano-heterostructure can be used in the fields of solar cells, sensors, light-emitting devices, and photocatalysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of the global economy, people’s living standards have been greatly improved. At the same time, environmental and energy issues have become increasingly prominent [1,2]. To alleviate these problems, the development of clean and renewable energy has become a current research hotspot. Among these renewable energy sources, solar energy is a cheap, safe, clean, and easily accessible renewable energy source. Making full use of solar energy can solve environmental and energy problems [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
ZnO is a semiconductor material with a band gap of 3.37 eV at room temperature [11,12]. Since the 1990s, due to its exciton binding energy of up to 60 meV, thermal stability, high chemical stability, photosensitivity, and catalytic activity, suitable band gap, rich and controllable morphology, environmentally friendly characteristics, and other advantages, it has been widely used in sensors, varistors, and optoelectronic devices [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Its bandgap is larger than the photon energy (3.10 eV) of visible light at room temperature, resulting in high transmittance in the visible light band, making it an ideal UV light-absorbing material [21]. However, for pure ZnO, the photocatalytic performance is not very good due to the recombination of photo-generated holes (h+) and photo-generated electrons (e−). In recent reports, it was pointed out that when heterostructured ZnO nanorods exist, they have stronger photocatalytic performance [22]. Recent studies have shown that when Ag is deposited on ZnO nanorods, Ag acts as a bridge and will inhibit the recombination of photogenerated electrons (e−)-h+ in ZnO nanorods [23].
Ag3PO4 has a lower valence band potential, generates photogenerated holes (h+), and therefore has a strong oxidation effect [24,25]. It has excellent photocatalytic properties and can degrade organic pollutants in natural light [26]. The photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4 crystal under natural light is higher than that of conventional n-doped TiO2 [27]. Its photocatalytic performance is limited by the separation of photogenerated charges, transmission efficiency, and ability to capture light. In recent reports, many researchers have selected appropriate metals or semiconductors to combine with target semiconductors to form specific multiple heterostructures [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], and this heterostructure can effectively regulate the energy band structure, change the distribution of surface charge, improve the photoelectric performance of the entire material. For example, there are reported a series of metal/oxide semiconductor heterostructures in recent reports, such as fluffy worm-like Ag core nanowires (NWs)-ZnO branched nanorods (ZnO BNRs) and dandelion-like Au core nanoparticles (NPs)-ZnO nanorods (ZnO NRs) heterostructures [36,37], and because of their heterostructure characteristics, they show stronger photocatalytic performance than ZnO nanorods. Similarly, by supporting Ag nanoparticles on the Ag3PO4 semiconductor to form a heterogeneous photocatalyst, it can effectively improve the absorption efficiency of natural light, broaden the absorption range of the spectrum, effectively separate photo-generated carriers, and use the generated carriers to participate in redox reactions [38].
In this paper, a ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 ternary heterojunction with high photocatalytic performance was prepared by the following steps. Firstly, control the morphology of ZnO and obtain more active sites to participate in the reaction to improve catalytic performance. Secondly, after recombination with silver, due to the different Fermi energy levels, the curved band structure can effectively separate photo-generated carriers and suppress their recombination, while expanding the absorption range of incident light. Finally, the semiconductor-metal interface (Schottky barrier) is formed by the deposition of Ag3O4, which prevents the recombination of photoinduced electrons(e−)-holes (h+), and reduces the photo corrosion effect through this interface.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Ag and ZnO targets with a diameter of 60 mm × 5 mm and purity of 99.99%, zinc nitrate hexahydrate(Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), hexamethylenetetramine(C6H12N4), anhydrous disodium hydrogen phosphate(Na2HPO4), silver nitrate(AgNO3), rhodamine B(C28H31CIN2O3), anhydrous ethanol(C2H6O). All drugs and reagents are analytical pure.

2.2. Preparation of ZnO Nanorods

First, the substrate was pre-deposited for 5 minutes at a vacuum of less than 4 × 10−4 Pa, an argon flow rate of 40 sscm, and a radio frequency (RF) sputtering power of 60 W. Magnetron sputtering instrument (JGP-560B type high vacuum magnetron sputtering coating system, Shenyang Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Chinese Academy of Sciences); Then, the substrate (with an fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) film on the surface) was aligned with the center of the ZnO target and sputtered for 5 minutes. ZnO deposited on FTO substrate at a thickness of 10 nm per minute, and the seed layer thickness was about 50 nm. After the sample is cooled, the precursor solution (zinc nitrate hexahydrate and hexamethylenetetramine) is placed at 95 ° C using a hydrothermal method and reacted for 4 hours to grow ZnO nanorods. The mass ratio of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O to C6H12N4 was 1: 1, and the experimental concentrations were 10, 20, 40 and 120 mmol/L, respectively. Finally, the samples were rinsed with deionized water more than three times and dried at room temperature. We label the sample with an experimental concentration of 10 mmol/L as 1#. The sample with an experimental concentration of 20 mmol/L is labeled 2#, the sample with an experimental concentration of 40 mmol/L is labeled 3#, and the sample with an experimental concentration of 120 mmol/L is labeled 4#, and the best-shaped samples were selected by the SEM test for the next step experiment.

2.3. Preparation of Ag Layer by Magnetron Sputtering

We use the results obtained in the previous experiment as the substrate for subsequent experiments (3#), and then a metal Ag layer was sputtered by magnetron. The vacuum was 4 × 10−4 Pa, and the argon flow rate was 40 sscm, the DC sputtering power was 45 W. We first pre-sputtered for 2 minutes and then officially sputtered each sample for 90 s. After the sputtering experiment was completed, the samples were taken out after cooling for 60 minutes and labeled 5#.

2.4. Preparation of Ag3PO4 by Step Deposition

In this section, AgNO3 and Na2HPO4 solutions were used as the deposition solution [39]. The concentrations of both solutions were 0.02 mol/L, and the volumes were 400 mL and 220 mL, respectively. The number of depositions is a set of variables, and the deposition process was as follows: 5# was placed in the AgNO3 solution for 30 min, moved to Na2HPO4 solution for 5 min, and finally washed with deionized water. All the above steps are regarded as one deposition, and different samples will be obtained for different deposition times. The deposition times of the samples were 1 time, 3 times, 5 times, and 7 times, respectively, and they were marked as 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9# after drying at room temperature.

2.5. Photocatalysis Experiment

The Rhodamine B (RhB) was selected as a photocatalytic degradation material and the concentration was 10 ppm. First, 50 mL RhB solution was transferred into a 100 mL beaker at each experiment, and the sample (7.0 × 1.5 cm2) was tilted face down on the side of the cup wall. To maintain the adsorption equilibrium, the samples were allowed to stand in RhB solution for 30 min before the experiment. Then FX-300 fiber optic light source (25 mW/cm2) was used for subsequent exposure, the light absorption test was performed by liquid UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2600A), the content of the degraded organic matter was detected by light absorption. To analyze the degradation process of the reaction solution, the RhB concentration spectrum was recorded once every 30 min by recording the absorption spectrum of RhB.

2.6. Experimental Instruments and Sample Characterization

Magnetron sputtering instrument (JGP-560B type high vacuum magnetron sputtering coating system, Shenyang Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China) The samples were analyzed by X-ray diffractometry (D/max-1400, Japanese Science, Tokyo Metropolis, Japan). scanning electron microscope (ULTRA55, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to study the surface structure and morphological characteristics of composite samples to analyze the morphology of samples; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to record the chemical states of the elements on a PHI-5702 multi-functional X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Physical Electronics, Chanhassen, MN, USA); ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2600A, Unico (Shanghai) Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to perform light absorption test on the degraded RhB solution; the contact angle tester (DSA30, Kruss, Germany) was used to analyze the hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of the sample. The test contact angle range is 0°–180°, and the resolution is ±0.01°.

3. Results and Analysis

ZnO nanorods are one-dimensional nanomaterials whose structure and morphology have a crucial effect on performance [40]. Figure 1 shows the SEM images of ZnO nanorods under different concentrations. Figure 1a is the SEM image of 1# growth concentration 10 mmol/L. It can be seen that the nanorods in the formed nanorod array are extremely short and unevenly distributed. It was because the concentration of the precursor was too low to crystallization it. Figure 1b shows the SEM image of 2# growth concentration 20 mmol/L. It can be seen that with the increase of the solution concentration, the length and diameter of the nanorods gradually increase, and some hexagonal rod-like structures are gradually formed, but the overall is still uneven. The SEM images of 3# growth concentration 40 mmol/L have been shown in Figure 1c, it was shown that the growth rate and aspect ratio of ZnO nanorods were increased. It meant that the nucleation site increase during hydrothermal was beneficial for the production of ZnO nanorods with high quality and density. Figure 1d is an SEM image of 4# growth concentration 120 mmol/L. It is seen that there is adhesion between the nanorods due to the too high concentration of the precursor solution. Previous research reports have found that the morphology of ZnO has a large effect on performance [40,41,42]. When the precursor concentration was 40 mmol/L, there was no adhesion between the nanorods, and they were evenly distributed.
The performance of ZnO nanorods is not ideal, and the photo-generated carrier recombination speed is fast. To suppress the recombination of photogenerated carriers, 3# having the best morphology was selected, and an Ag layer with a thickness of 100 nm was sputtered on the 3# surface. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of 5#. It can be clearly seen that, after the magnetron sputtering of the Ag layer, there was a thin film outline on the ZnO nanorods’ surface. This meant that the Ag layer attached to the ZnO nanorods’ surface successfully. Figure 3 was the SEM images of 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9#. It can be seen that when the number of depositions is one, there are only a small amount of Ag3PO4 nanoparticles on the surface. When the number of deposition times is three, there are a relatively uniformly distribution of Ag3PO4 nanoparticles on the surface. As the number of depositions increases to five, many Ag3PO4 nanoparticles of the same shape and size appear on the surface. When the time of depositions increased to seven, we can see from the picture that the grown Ag3PO4 nanoparticles are too large and irregular in shape.
Figure 4a shows the X-Ray Diffraction pattern (XRD) of ZnO nanorods grown on FTO conductive glass (3#) and the XRD test of 5#. It was shown that there were four characteristics of the 3# at 31.75°, 34.39°, 36.23°, and 62.80° which correspond to its (100), (002), (101), and (103) crystal planes of ZnO. Among these diffraction peaks, the (002) diffraction peaks crystal plane was the strongest, indicated that ZnO growth along the (002) crystal plane preferentially, this was because the surface free energy of the (002) crystal plane was lowest [43,44]. For 5#, there was a characteristic diffraction peak of Ag (111) at 38.36° in Figure 4a, this was due to the Ag layer on 5# [45,46]. A shift of diffraction pattern peaks is attributed to the fact that when some silver was sputtered onto the ZnO nano-surface by magnetron sputtering, it entered into the ZnO lattice, which caused the plane reflection X-rays of ZnO in samples 3 and 5 to be different. Figure 4b shows the XRD diffraction patterns of 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9#. It can be seen there were other nine diffraction peaks corresponding to the (110), (200), (210), (102), (310), (322), (320), and (321) crystal planes of Ag3PO4, respectively [47,48]. Moreover, the intensity of these peaks increases as the number of deposits increases. This is because when the number of deposits is small, there are few Ag3PO4 nanoparticles, so the characteristic diffraction peaks are not visible. As the number of deposits increases, the amount of Ag3PO4 nanoparticles increases, and the intensity of diffraction peaks related to Ag3PO4 gradually increases. These results showed that ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 has been prepared successfully.
X-ray photo-e− spectroscopy (XPS) can provide more info about the chemical state of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4. Figure 5 shows the XPS of 7#. It can be seen there are Zn, Ag, P, and O in 7#. The position of the Zn2p band for ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 (Figure 5a) was at about 1022.1 eV, which meant that the Zn element was the form of Zn2+ here [49]. Figure 5b shows the detailed spectra for Ag. It can be seen there were two bands at 368.05 and 374.15 eV which ascribed the Ag 3d5/2 (metallic Ag0 in Ag layer) and Ag 3d3/2 (Ag+ in Ag3PO4), respectively; these results were similar with related reports [50,51]. The Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 bands could be further divided into two different binds at 368.0, 367.5 eV and 374.0, 373.4 eV, respectively [52]. These results indicated there was metallic Ag0 in ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4. The peak at 531.55 eV was related to lattice oxygen (O 1s) in ZnO and Ag3PO4 and the peak at 133.6 eV corresponds to the binding energy of phosphorus 2p (P 2p) in Ag3PO4. From previous reports, there was a minor difference in these data, which was attributed to the ternary heterojunction.
Figure 6a,b show the static contact angles of 3# and 5#, respectively. It was shown that the static contact angle of ZnO was 13.33°. When a 100 nm Ag layer is present on the surface, the static contact angle increases from 13.33° to 25.43°, and the surface hydrophilicity decreases. The reason is that ZnO is a metal oxide, which itself has a certain hydrophilicity. However, Ag is not easily oxidized into a polar metal oxide in the air, and itself has certain hydrophobicity. For 7#, it could be seen from Figure 6c that there was complete wetness and the static contact angle was 0° on the surface—this is because the Ag3PO4 was an inorganic metal salt and was hydrophilic.
Figure 7 shows the light reflection of 3#, 5#, and 7#. It can be seen that there was reflection from 380 nm to 800 nm of 3#, 5#, and 7#. The reflectance of 3# was approximately 50.94%. The reflectance of 5# was 16.52% and was 34.42% lower than that of ZnO, which meant that the Ag layer in this material was beneficial to light absorption [53,54,55]. The reflectivity of 7# was 8.24%, and was 8.28% lower than 5#, meaning that core-shell composites had a high light absorption.
Figure 8a shows the photocatalytic test results of 3#, 5#, and 10# (5# without Ag layer). The results show that the photocatalytic performance of 5# is higher than that of 3# and 10#, which means that when the surface has an Ag layer, the photocatalytic performance can be improved. The reason is that when there is an Ag layer, the photogenerated e−-h+ will be separated and utilized due to the potential, thereby reducing its recombination rate. The separation efficiency of the photo-generated carriers was added [56,57,58]. Simultaneously, the Ag layer played an important role in collecting e− by acting as an e− acceptor; it could separate photogenerated carriers effectively and inhibited the recombination of photo-generated carriers produced by ZnO, photocatalytic reduction, and the oxidation reactions of e− and h+.
Figure 8b is the photocatalytic test results of 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9#. It can be seen that with the increase of the number of depositions, the photocatalytic performance increases. When the number of depositions is three times (7#), the photocatalytic performance reaches the best. This is because the Ag3PO4 nanoparticles on the 7# surface are relatively uniformly distributed and are hydrophilic, which can better contact and react with the substances in the solution. Besides, lower reflectivity means more light energy is converted into chemical energy. The 7# had the best photocatalytic properties. Figure 8c is the continuous photocatalytic test of 7#. The results showed that with the increase in degradation time, the prepared samples continued to degrade RhB. The detailed sample number and related characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Based on the above results, the reason why the performance of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 heterostructures was better than Ag3PO4 nanoparticle and pure ZnO nanorods is discussed in more detail. The Figure 9 illustrated the band structure of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 heterostructures. When ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 was located at an organic solution and radiated by UV light while photon energy was equal to or higher than the bandgap of ZnO nanorods, the e− in the valence band (VB) could be excited to the conduction band (CB) and the h+ would be generated in VB with the same number. As illustrated in Figure 9, the new Fermi energy level of heterostructure was lower than the energy level at the bottom of CB, the photoexcited e− could be moved from ZnO nanorods to Ag through above potential. At the same time, there is an appropriate Fermi level in Ag, which could serve as an excellent e− acceptor for facilitating the transfer of e− from Ag3PO4 nanoparticle quickly at nature light irradiation [59,60,61]. Thereby, the photoexcited e− could be migrated to Ag quickly, and the photoinduced h+ still situated on Ag3PO4 nanoparticle and ZnO nanorods, which promoted the separation of photoexcited e−–h+ effectively. As illustrated in Figure 6b, the enriched e− on Ag nanocrystals could promote the multiple-e− reduction reaction effectively, the corresponding reaction formula is as follows [62,63,64], O2 + 4H+ + 4e− → 2H2O.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 ternary nano-heterostructure was obtained by magneto-sputtering, hydrothermal method, and deposition successively. The SEM, XRD, and XPS have been tested the morphology, structure, and elements. The study found that the morphology of ZnO nanorods was the best when the concentration of the precursor solution was 40 mmol/L. The presence of Ag in the heterojunction can effectively improve the separation of photoinduced electrons and holes, and therefore has excellent photoelectric conversion properties. The hydrophilicity increased and light reflectance decreased after the deposition of Ag3PO4.

Author Contributions

H.H., H.J., Y.T., X.L., Z.Y., X.G., X.C., J.C., and P.W. conceived and designed experiments; H.H., H.J. performed the experiments; H.H., H.J., Y.T., Z.Y., and P.W. analyzed the data; Z.Y. and P.W. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; H.H. wrote the draft; H.H. revised and edited the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51606158, 11604311, 61705204, 21506257, 11704223); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2018J05008, JZ160459), the PhD research startup foundation of Quanzhou Normal University (G16057); the funded by the Talent Cultivation and Discipline Competition Innovation Fund of the Southwest University of Science and Technology (No. LXCX-11), the Sichuan’s Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduate (No. S201910619086).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abulfotuh, F. Energy efficiency and renewable technologies: The way to sustainable energy future. Desalination 2007, 209, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, P.Q.; Chen, X.F.; Yi, Z.; Tang, Y.J.; Yang, H.; Zhou, Z.G.; Duan, T.; Cheng, S.B.; Zhang, J.G.; Yi, Y.G. A numerical research of wideband solar absorber based on refractory metal from visible to near infrared. Opt. Mater. 2019, 97, 109400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.K.; Chen, X.F.; Yi, Z.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.; Yao, W.T.; Wang, J.Q.; Yi, Y.G. Broadband solar energy absorber based on monolayer molybdenum disulfide using tungsten elliptical arrays. Mater. Today Energy 2020, 16, 100390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.K.; Chen, Z.Q.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Yao, W.T.; Duan, T.; Wu, P.H.; Li, G.F.; Yi, Y.G. Tunable broadband solar energy absorber based on monolayer transition metal Dichalcogenides materials using au nanocubes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yi, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, H.; Chen, X.F.; Fan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G.; Wang, J.Q.; Wu, P.H. Synthesis, surface properties, crystal structure and dye-sensitized solar cell performance of TiO2 nanotube arrays anodized under different parameters. Result Phys. 2019, 15, 102609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, M.M.; Dai, J.Y.; He, M.Y.; Duan, T.; Yao, W.T. Biomass-derived carbon from Ganoderma lucidum spore as a promising anode material for rapid potassium-ion storage. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2020, 567, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kou, Z.Y.; Miao, C.; Mei, P.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, X.M.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, W. Enhancing the cycling stability of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries assembled with Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 solid electrolytes prepared from precursor solutions with appropriate pH values. Ceram. Int. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, W.B.; Xiao, Y. Mechanism of electrocatalytically active precious metal (Ni, Pd, Pt, and Ru) complexes in the graphene basal plane for ORR applications in novel fuel cells. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 2425–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Wang, X.X.; Li, R.S.; Xian, T. Evolution of Bi nanowires from BiOBr nanoplates through a NaBH4 reduction method with enhanced photodegradation performance. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2020, 37, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Xian, T.; Li, R.S.; Wang, X.X. Construction of Ag2S@CaTiO3 heterojunction photocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dyes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 170, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, H.; Jile, H.; Chen, Z.Q.; Xu, D.Y.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Chen, J.; Yao, W.T.; Wu, P.H.; Yi, Y.G. Fabrication of ZnO@MoS2 nanocomposite heterojunction arrays and their photoelectric properties. Micromachines 2020, 11, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, S.; Gao, H.; Chen, C.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, X. Irradiation assisted polyacrylamide gel route for the synthesize of the Mg1–xCoxAl2O4 nano-photocatalysts and its optical and photocatalytic performances. J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 2019, 92, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vayssieres, L. Growth of arrayed nanorods and nanowires of ZnO from aqueous solutions. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, P.H.; Chen, Z.Q.; Xu, D.Y.; Zhang, C.F.; Jian, R.H. A narrow dual-band monolayer unpatterned graphene-based perfect absorber with critical coupling in the near infrared. Micromachines 2020, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Park, W.I.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, S.W.; Yi, G.G. Metalorganic vapor-phase epitaxial growth of vertically well-aligned ZnO nanorods. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4232–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, P.H.; Chen, Z.Q.; Jile, H.; Zhang, C.F.; Xu, D.Y.; Lv, L. An infrared perfect absorber based on metal-dielectric-metal multi-layer films with nanocircle holes arrays. Result. Phys. 2020, 16, 102952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.Y.; Chen, Z.Q.; Xu, D.Y.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Chen, J.; Tang, Y.J.; Wu, P.H.; Li, G.F.; Yi, Y.G. Triple-band perfect metamaterial absorber with good operating angle polarization tolerance based on split ring arrays. Result Phys. 2020, 16, 102951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qin, F.; Chen, Z.Q.; Chen, X.F.; Yi, Z.; Yao, W.T.; Duan, T.; Wu, P.H.; Yang, H.; Li, G.F.; Yi, Y.G. A tunable triple-band near-infrared metamaterial absorber based on au Nano-Cuboids array. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Cen, C.L.; Chen, Z.Q.; Xu, D.Y.; Jiang, L.Y.; Chen, X.F.; Yi, Z.; Wu, P.H.; Li, G.F.; Yi, Y.G. High quality factor, high sensitivity metamaterial graphene-perfect absorber based on critical coupling theory and impedance matching. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ali, R.N.; Naz, H.; Shah, S.M. Sulphonic acid functionalized porphyrin grafted ZnO nanorods: Synthesis, characterization and applications in the solid state dye sensitized solar cells. Dyes Pigment. 2013, 99, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.P.; Jiang, F.C.; Chen, J.F.; Sun, X.F.; Xian, T.; Yang, H. In situ construction of CNT/CuS hybrids and their application in photodegradation for removing organic dyes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, S.; Gao, H.; Sun, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, C.; Yang, L. Structure characterization, optical and photoluminescence properties of scheelite-type CaWO4 nanophosphors: Effects of calcination temperature and carbon skeleton. Opt. Mater. 2020, 99, 109562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, C.; Yang, B.; Wu, M.; Xu, J.; Fu, Z.; Lv, Y. Synthesis of Ag/ZnO nanorods array with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Luo, L.; Li, Y.; Hou, J.; Yang, Y. Visible photocatalysis and photostability of Ag3PO4 photocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 319, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, W.Y.; Cheng, Y.Z. Dual-band tunable terahertz perfect metamaterial absorber based on strontium titanate (STO) resonator structure. Opt. Commun. 2020, 462, 125265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, W.B.; Xiao, X.; Wu, Q.F.; Fan, Q.; Chen, S.J.; Yang, W.X.; Zhang, F.C. Facile synthesis of novel Mn-doped Bi4O5Br2 for enhanced photocatalytic NO removal activity. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 826, 154204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bi, Y.P.; Ouyang, S.X.; Umezawa, N.; Cao, J.Y.; Ye, J.H. Facet effect of single-crystalline Ag3PO4 sub-microcrystals on photocatalytic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6490–6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Li, R.S.; Xian, T. Design of ternary CaTiO3/g-C3N4/AgBr Z-scheme heterostructured photocatalysts and their application for dye photodegradation. Solid State Sci. 2020, 100, 106102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.P.; Yang, H.; Sun, X.F.; Zhang, H.M.; Xian, T. Preparation and photocatalytic application of ternary n-BaTiO3/Ag/p-AgBr heterostructured photocatalysts for dye degradation. Mater. Res. Bull. 2020, 124, 110754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, Y.P.; Zhou, P.Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.Q.; Bai, Y.L.; Wang, X.X. Theoretical study of a multichannel plasmonic waveguide notch filter with double-sided nanodisk and two slot cavities. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qi, Y.P.; Liu, C.Q.; Hu, B.B.; Deng, X.Y.; Wang, X.X. Tunable plasmonic absorber in THz-band range based on graphene “arrow” shaped metamaterial. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guan, S.T.; Yang, H.; Sun, X.F.; Xian, T. Preparation and promising application of novel LaFeO3/BiOBr heterojunction photocatalysts for photocatalytic and photo-Fenton removal of dyes. Opt. Mater. 2020, 100, 109644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qi, Y.P.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.W.; Liu, C.Q.; Hu, B.B.; Bai, Y.L.; Wang, X.X. A theoretical study of optically enhanced transmission characteristics of subwavelength metal Y-shaped arrays and its application on refractive index sensor. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, D.; Xiong, Z.; Li, J.; Luo, B.; Fang, L.; Xia, Y.; Gao, Z. Electron transition and electron-hole recombination processes in epitaxial BaTiO3 films with embedded Co nanocrystals. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 105021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, C.C.; Xie, B.; He, Z.X.; Chen, J.; Long, Y. 3D structure fungiderived carbon stabilized stearic acid as a composite phase change material for thermal energy storage. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, S.W.; Yu, Y.; Zuo, Y.H.; Li, C.Z.; Yang, J.H.; Lu, C.H. Synthesis and photocatalysis of hierarchical heteroassemblies of ZnO branched nanorod arrays on Ag core nanowires. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 5895–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zuo, Y.H.; Qin, Y.; Jin, C.; Li, Y.; Shi, D.L.; Wu, Q.S.; Yang, J.H. Double-sided ZnO nanorod arrays on single-crystal Ag holed microdisks with enhanced photocataltytic efficiency. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4388–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, S.; Gao, H.; Chen, C.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Wei, Y.; Fang, L. Effect of phase transition on optical and photoluminescence properties of nano-MgWO4 phosphor prepared by a gamma-ray irradiation assisted polyacrylamide gel method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 15744–15753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yi, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, H.; Chen, X.F.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, P.H. Fabrication of ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays as photoanodes and their photoelectric properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Gao, H. synergistic effects of optical and photoluminescence properties, charge transfer, and photocatalytic activity in MgAl2O4: Ce and Mn-Codoped MgAl2O4: Ce Phosphors. J. Electron. Mater. 2019, 48, 6675–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xiong, Z.; Cao, L. Nanostructure and optical property tuning between the graphitic-like CNx and fullerene-like β-C3N4 via Fe doping and substrate temperature. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 775, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zou, H.; Cheng, Y. Design of a six-band terahertz metamaterial absorber for temperature sensing application. Opt. Mater. 2019, 88, 674–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; He, Z.B.; Tan, X.L.; Wang, T.; Liu, L.; He, X.S.; Liu, X.D.; Zhang, L.; Du, K. High-performance 2.6 V aqueous symmetric supercapacitor based on porous boron doped diamond via regrowth of diamond nanoparticles. Carbon 2020, 160, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ni, Y.; Xiao, W.; Miao, C.; Xu, M.B.; Wang, C.J. Effect of calcining oxygen pressure gradient on properties of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 334, 135654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liang, C.P.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.; Zhou, Z.G.; Wu, X.G.; Huang, Z.; Yi, Y.G.; Zhang, G.F. Dual-band infrared perfect absorber based on a Ag-dielectric-Ag multilayer films with nanoring grooves arrays. Plasmonics 2020, 15, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, M.W.; Liang, C.P.; Zhang, Y.B.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Zhou, Z.G.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G. Terahertz wideband perfect absorber based on open loop with cross nested structure. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, R.; Miao, C.; Zhang, M.Q.; Xiao, W. Novel hierarchical structural SnS2 composite supported by biochar carbonized from chewed sugarcane as enhanced anodes for lithium ion batteries. Ionics 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Xian, T. NaBH4-reduction induced evolution of Bi nanoparticles from BiOCl nanoplates and construction of promising Bi@BiOCl hybrid photocatalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cheng, Z.Z.; Cheng, Y.Z. A multi-functional polarization convertor based on chiral metamaterial for terahertz waves. Opt. Commun. 2019, 435, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, P.; Huang, B.B.; Qin, X.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Dai, Y.; Whangbo, M.H. Ag/AgBr/WO3 · H2O: Visible-Light Photocatalyst for Bacteria Destruction. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 10697–10702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lv, Y.R.; Li, Y.H.; Han, C.; Chen, J.F.; He, Z.X.; Zhu, J.; Dai, L.; Meng, W.; Wang, L. Application of porousbiomass carbon materials in vanadium redox flow battery. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2020, 566, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Arabatzis, I.M.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Bernard, M.C.; Labou, D.; Neophytides, S.G.; Falaras, P. Silver-modified titanium dioxide thin films for efficient photodegradation of methyl orange. Appl. Catal. B 2003, 42, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.Y.; Qin, F.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Zhou, Z.G.; Yang, H.; Liao, X.; Tang, Y.J.; Yao, W.T.; Yi, Y.G. Effect of slit width on surface plasmon resonance. Result Phys. 2019, 15, 102711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, C.P.; Zhang, Y.B.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Zhou, Z.G.; Yang, H.; Yi, Y.; Tang, Y.J.; Yao, W.T.; Yi, Y.G. A broadband and polarization-independent metamaterial perfect absorber with monolayer Cr and Ti elliptical disks array. Result Phys. 2019, 15, 102635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zheng, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhan, Y.; Lin, X.; Zheng, Q.; Wei, K. Ag/ZnO Heterostructure Nanocrystals:  Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalysis. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 6980–6986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X.W.; Qi, Y.P.; Zhou, P.Y.; Gong, H.H.; Hu, B.B.; Yan, C.M. Refractive index sensor based on fano resonances in plasmonic waveguide with dual side-coupled ring resonators. Photonic Sens. 2018, 8, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Cen, C.L.; Zhang, Y.B.; Chen, X.F.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Yao, W.T.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G.; Wang, J.Q.; Wu, P.H. A dual-band metamaterial absorber for graphene surface plasmon resonance at terahertz frequency. Phys. E 2020, 117, 113840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gondal, M.A.; Chang, X.F.; Sha, W.; Yamani, Z.H.; Zhou, Q. Enhanced photoactivity on Ag/Ag3PO4 composites by plasmonic effect. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 329, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fan, J.P.; Cheng, Y.Z. Broadband high-efficiency cross-polarization conversion and multi-functional wavefront manipulation based on chiral structure metasurface for terahertz wave. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 025109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qi, Y.P.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.Q.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, B.H.; Wang, L.Y.; Deng, X.Y.; Bai, Y.L.; Wang, X.X. A tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber composed of elliptical ring graphene arrays with refractive index sensing application. Result Phys. 2020, 16, 103012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, J.G.; Xiong, J.F.; Cheng, B.; Liu, S.W. Fabrication and characterization of Ag-TiO2 multiphase nanocomposite thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 2005, 60, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, P.H.; Zhang, C.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Liu, B.; Lv, L. A Perfect Absorber Based on Similar Fabry-Perot Four-Band in the Visible Range. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Cheng, Y.Z.; Fan, J.P.; Luo, H.; Chen, F. Dual-band and high-efficiency circular polarization convertor based on anisotropic metamaterial. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 7615–7621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yamada, H.; Bhattacharyya, A.J.; Maier, J. Extremely high silver ionic conductivity in composites of silver halide (AgBr, AgI) and mesoporous alumina. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Micromachines 11 00309 g001 550
Figure 1. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ZnO nanorods at different concentrations, size, and uniformity of ZnO nanorods (a) 10 mmol/L (sample 1#), (b) 20 mmol/L (sample 2#), (c) 40 mmol/L (sample 3#), (d) 120 mmol/L (sample 4#).
Figure 1. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ZnO nanorods at different concentrations, size, and uniformity of ZnO nanorods (a) 10 mmol/L (sample 1#), (b) 20 mmol/L (sample 2#), (c) 40 mmol/L (sample 3#), (d) 120 mmol/L (sample 4#).
Micromachines 11 00309 g001
Micromachines 11 00309 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM image of Ag sputtered on the surface of ZnO nanorods at low magnification (a) and high magnification (b) viewing angles, corresponding to sample 5#.
Figure 2. SEM image of Ag sputtered on the surface of ZnO nanorods at low magnification (a) and high magnification (b) viewing angles, corresponding to sample 5#.
Micromachines 11 00309 g002
Micromachines 11 00309 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4: (a) Ag3PO4 deposition once (6#), (b) Ag3PO4 deposition three times (7#), (c) Ag3PO4 deposition five times(8#), (d) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times (9#).
Figure 3. SEM images of ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4: (a) Ag3PO4 deposition once (6#), (b) Ag3PO4 deposition three times (7#), (c) Ag3PO4 deposition five times(8#), (d) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times (9#).
Micromachines 11 00309 g003
Micromachines 11 00309 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods (3#) and ZnO nanorods + Ag (5#), (b) the XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4: Ag3PO4 deposition once (6#). Ag3PO4 deposition three times (7#). Ag3PO4 deposition five times (8#). Ag3PO4 deposition seven times (9#).
Figure 4. (a) The XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods (3#) and ZnO nanorods + Ag (5#), (b) the XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4: Ag3PO4 deposition once (6#). Ag3PO4 deposition three times (7#). Ag3PO4 deposition five times (8#). Ag3PO4 deposition seven times (9#).
Micromachines 11 00309 g004
Micromachines 11 00309 g005 550
Figure 5. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of Zn2p (a), Ag3d (b), P2P (c), and O1S (d) in ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4.
Figure 5. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of Zn2p (a), Ag3d (b), P2P (c), and O1S (d) in ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4.
Micromachines 11 00309 g005
Micromachines 11 00309 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Static contact angle of the ZnO nanorods (3#). (b) ZnO nanorods + Ag (5#). (c) ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4 (deposition three times 7#).
Figure 6. (a) Static contact angle of the ZnO nanorods (3#). (b) ZnO nanorods + Ag (5#). (c) ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4 (deposition three times 7#).
Micromachines 11 00309 g006
Micromachines 11 00309 g007 550
Figure 7. UV-visible reflectance of the sample: (3#) ZnO nanorods. (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag. (7#) ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4 (deposition three times).
Figure 7. UV-visible reflectance of the sample: (3#) ZnO nanorods. (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag. (7#) ZnO nanorods + Ag + Ag3PO4 (deposition three times).
Micromachines 11 00309 g007
Micromachines 11 00309 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The light absorption test of the solution after photocatalysis by 3#, 5#, and 10#; (b) the light absorption test of the solution after photocatalysis by 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9#; (c) continuous photocatalytic test of 7 # sample.
Figure 8. (a) The light absorption test of the solution after photocatalysis by 3#, 5#, and 10#; (b) the light absorption test of the solution after photocatalysis by 6#, 7#, 8#, and 9#; (c) continuous photocatalytic test of 7 # sample.
Micromachines 11 00309 g008
Micromachines 11 00309 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic representation of the ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 heterojunction.
Figure 9. Schematic representation of the ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 heterojunction.
Micromachines 11 00309 g009
Table
Table 1. Sample table and main features of each sample.
Table 1. Sample table and main features of each sample.
Sample NumberSample NameMain Characteristics
1#ZnOArray are extremely short and unevenly distributed
2#ZnONanorods increase in length and diameter, but are not uniform overall
3#ZnONanorods have the best morphology and size
4#ZnOAdhesion between nanorods
5#ZnO@AgUV-visible light reflection is higher than pure ZnO, but hydrophobic
6#ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4UV-visible light reflection is higher than the ZnO@Ag, but hydrophilic
7#ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4The photocatalytic performance reaches the best.
8#ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4UV-visible light reflection is higher than the ZnO@Ag, but hydrophilic
9#ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4UV-visible light reflection is higher than the ZnO@Ag, but hydrophilic

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huan, H.; Jile, H.; Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Yi, Z.; Gao, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Wu, P. Fabrication of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 Ternary Heterojunction: Superhydrophilic Properties, Antireflection and Photocatalytic Properties. Micromachines 2020, 11, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030309

AMA Style

Huan H, Jile H, Tang Y, Li X, Yi Z, Gao X, Chen X, Chen J, Wu P. Fabrication of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 Ternary Heterojunction: Superhydrophilic Properties, Antireflection and Photocatalytic Properties. Micromachines. 2020; 11(3):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huan, Huan, Huge Jile, Yijun Tang, Xin Li, Zao Yi, Xiang Gao, Xifang Chen, Jian Chen, and Pinghui Wu. 2020. "Fabrication of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 Ternary Heterojunction: Superhydrophilic Properties, Antireflection and Photocatalytic Properties" Micromachines 11, no. 3: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030309

APA Style

Huan, H., Jile, H., Tang, Y., Li, X., Yi, Z., Gao, X., Chen, X., Chen, J., & Wu, P. (2020). Fabrication of ZnO@Ag@Ag3PO4 Ternary Heterojunction: Superhydrophilic Properties, Antireflection and Photocatalytic Properties. Micromachines, 11(3), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop