Next Article in Journal
Temperature Characteristics of a Contour Mode MEMS AlN Piezoelectric Ring Resonator on SOI Substrate
Next Article in Special Issue
Geometric Methods for Efficient Planar Swimming of Copepod Nauplii
Previous Article in Journal
Periodic Analysis of Surface Acoustic Wave Resonator with Dimensionally Reduced PDE Model Using COMSOL Code
Previous Article in Special Issue
Propulsion Mechanism of Flexible Microbead Swimmers in the Low Reynolds Number Regime
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/mi12020142
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Whole-Cell Biosensors for Detection of Metal Using MerR Family Proteins from Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR02

by
Georgina Baya
1,
Stephen Muhindi
2,
Valentine Ngendahimana
3 and
Jonathan Caguiat
1,*
1
Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH 44555, USA
2
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
3
Biology Department, Lone Star College-CyFair, 9191 Barker Cypress Rd, Cypress, TX 77433, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2021, 12(2), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020142
Submission received: 7 January 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microswimmers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cell-based biosensors harness a cell’s ability to respond to the environment by repurposing its sensing mechanisms. MerR family proteins are activator/repressor switches that regulate the expression of bacterial metal resistance genes and have been used in metal biosensors. Upon metal binding, a conformational change switches gene expression from off to on. The genomes of the multimetal resistant bacterial strains, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain 02 (S. maltophilia 02) and Enterobacter sp. YSU, were recently sequenced. Sequence analysis and gene cloning identified three mercury resistance operons and three MerR switches in these strains. Transposon mutagenesis and sequence analysis identified Enterobacter sp. YSU zinc and copper resistance operons, which appear to be regulated by the protein switches, ZntR and CueR, respectively. Sequence analysis and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) showed that a CueR switch appears to activate a S. maltophilia 02 copper transport gene in the presence of CuSO4 and HAuCl4·3H2O. In previous studies, genetic engineering replaced metal resistance genes with the reporter genes for β-galactosidase, luciferase or the green fluorescence protein (GFP). These produce a color change of a reagent, produce light, or fluoresce in the presence of ultraviolet (UV) light, respectively. Coupling these discovered operons with reporter genes has the potential to create whole-cell biosensors for HgCl2, ZnCl2, CuSO4 and HAuCl4·3H2O.

1. Introduction

Whole-cell biosensors are highly anticipated in the field of on-site detection [1,2,3]. Metal-resistant bacteria control the expression of their metal resistant genes using protein switches. They activate or turn them on in the presence of toxic metals and repress them or turn them off in the absence of metal to conserve energy. The Tn21 mercury resistance operon (mer) from Shigella flexneri has been well studied [4] and the protein switch, MerR, controls its expression [5,6]. The operon consists of the genes, merT, merP, merC, merA, merD, merE (merTPCADE) and merR (Figure 1a) [7,8]. The genes, merTPCADE, are transcribed in the opposite direction in relation to merR. MerT, MerC and MerE are cytoplasmic membrane proteins, while MerP is a periplasmic protein [9,10]. All four transport divalent mercury (Hg(II)) into the cells. Then, MerA, mercuric reductase, reduces it to elemental mercury (Hg(0)), which volatilizes from the microorganisms environment [11]. MerR is an activator/repressor protein switch [12], which binds to the operator region of the merTPCADE and merR promoters and represses the expression of merTPCADE and merR in the absence of Hg(II). When Hg(II) is present, it activates the expression of merTPCADE, while still repressing the expression of merR. Even under this repressed state, enough merR is transcribed and translated to produce MerR protein that efficiently regulates merTPCADE expression. When the concentration of mercury decreases below toxic levels, MerD restores the operon to the repressed state [13,14].
The MerR protein has three domains: a DNA binding domain, a mercury binding domain and a coupling domain (Figure 1b) [12,15,16,17]. It binds as a homodimer, two identical polypeptides, to the operator in the DNA using a helix-turn-helix motif. The binding or operator region in the DNA is located between the −10 and −35 RNA polymerase binding sites of the promoter and consists of an inverted repeat (Figure 1a). Each polypeptide in the homodimer binds to one of the repeats. The mercury binding domain contains a dimerization helix, a metal binding loop and a 2-turn alpha-helix. The dimerization helices link the dimer together in an antiparallel orientation and form a coiled coil [18]. The protein uses the sulfhydryl groups from three cysteine amino acid residues, cys82, cys117 and cys126, to bind to mercury. Since it forms a dimer, it contains two Hg(II) binding sites with a binding site consisting of cys82 and cys117 from the dimerization helix of one polypeptide and cys126 from the 2-turn α-helix of the other polypeptide. In each monomer, the coupling domain contains two alpha helices and links the mercury binding domain to the DNA binding domain. The optimal number of nucleotides between the between the −10 and −35 sites of most promoters is 17 base pairs, which allows RNA polymerase to bind to the DNA and initiate transcription [19]. The merTPCADE promoter contains a non-optimal 19 base pair spacer [20]. When MerR binds to Hg(II), conformational changes in the metal binding, coupling and DNA binding domains [21] shorten the distance between and aligns the −10 and −35 sites so that RNA polymerase efficiently binds to these sites and activates or switches on the expression of the resistance genes [22].
Reporter genes are useful for studying gene expression levels activated by MerR in the presence of Hg(II) [23]. The enzyme, β-galactosidase (LacZ), hydrolyzes lactose to form glucose and galactose. Ortho-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG) is an analog of lactose. When LacZ hydrolyzes ONPG it produces a yellow color [24]. Previously, replacement of merTPCADE with lacZ as a reporter gene and the use of ONPG as a color indicator detected Hg(II) at concentrations between 0.5 and 1 ng/mL [25]. Since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limit is 2 ng/mL or 10 nM, this system can serve as an effective biosensor to detect toxic levels of Hg(II) in a water sample [26].
MerR family proteins serve as activator/repressor protein switches for other metal resistances [27,28]. They each contain a DNA binding domain, a metal-binding domain, and a coupling domain with similar motifs in each domain. They also bind as dimers to inverted repeats associated with their −10 and −35 promoter regions and repress expression in the absence of metal and activate expression in the presence of metal. Some examples of MerR family proteins are ZntR, which regulates zinc resistance, and CueR which regulates copper and sometime gold resistance in a wide variety of microorganisms [17].
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain 02 (S. maltophilia 02) and Enterobacter sp. YSU were isolated from a heavy metal contaminated site in Oak Ridge, TN [29]. They are both resistant to HgCl2, ZnCl2, CuSO4, HAuCl4 and other metal salts. The genomes of both strains were sequenced. Since these strains are multimetal-resistant, we expected to find genes for MerR and other MerR family proteins in these strains. Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analysis of the genomes using Tn21 merR identified two potential merR genes and a cueR gene in S. maltophilia 02. It also identified one potential merR gene, a zntR gene and a cueR gene in Enterobacter sp. YSU. In this article, the resistance genes that are putatively regulated by these MerR family proteins have been identified through BLAST analysis, cloning techniques and transposon mutagenesis. Replacing these resistance genes with a reporter gene makes them potentially useful as whole-cell biosensors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids and Media

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Oak Ridge strain 02 (ATCC #53510) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), Enterobacter sp. YSU was described previously [29] and StrataClone SoloPack Competent Cells and the plasmid, pSC-A-amp/kan, were purchased from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) as components of the StrataClone PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Cloning Kit. TransforMax™ EC100D™ pir-116 Escherichia coli (E. coli) was purchased from Lucigen (Middleton, WI, USA) [30].
Lennox LB medium was purchased from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA), and R3A-tris medium was described previously [29]. When required, LB or R3A-tris medium was supplemented with 100 µg/mL ampicillin (Amresco), 50 µg/mL kanamycin (Amresco) and varying concentrations of HgCl2, ZnCl2, CdCl2, CuSO4 (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) and HAuCl4·3H2O (Amresco).

2.2. Genomic Sequencing and Sequence Analysis

A pellet from 1 mL of cells was sent to GENWIZ (South Plainfield, NJ, USA) for DNA extraction, library preparation and Next Generation Sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq 2 × 150 bp configuration with an average of ~2 Gb of raw data and a coverage of about 400× coverage per sample. The orientation and order of the resultant contigs were determined using Mauve software [31] with the Enterobacter hormaechei strain MS7884A chromosome (accession CP022532.1) as a reference for Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain NCTC13014 genome assembly (accession LR134301.1) as a reference for S. maltophilia 02. BLAST analysis using these same reference sequences was used to estimate the length of gaps between the contigs [32,33,34]. Because the next-generation sequencing method was not designed for plasmids, plasmid sequences for Enterobater sp. YSU were removed. There were no plasmid sequences for S. maltophilia 02. The sequences were then annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [35,36]. The accession numbers are CP059487 for Enterobacter sp. YSU and CP056088 for S. maltophilia 02. DNA and protein sequences were aligned using the default settings for MEGA version X software [37].

2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

All PCR reactions were performed using 2X GoTaq®Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The Master Mix was diluted to 1X with nuclease free water (Amresco), 0.25 μM primer pairs (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) and DNA template. After an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 2 min, the reaction was incubated for 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min for denaturing, 55–65 °C for 1 min depending on the annealing properties of the primers, and 72 °C for 1 min/kb copied for synthesis. After a final 72 °C extension step for 10 min, the reactions were held at 10 °C. The S. maltophilia 02 mer operon 1 (S02-mer1) was copied using the primers, S02_mer1_FWD (5′ GTTCCGGCGTCGTCCATCCATC 3′) and S02_mer1_REV (5′ CACCAAGCACCAACTCGGTCCC 3′). The S. maltophilia 02 mer operon 2 (S02-mer2) was copied using the primers, S02_mer2_FWD (5′ CACAGAGCCTGCGAATCGGCAA 3′) and S02_mer2_REV (5′ CCTCGTATGGGGCAGGCTGAGA 3′). S. maltophilia 02 genomic DNA was used as a template for both reactions. The Enterobacter sp. YSU mer operon (YSU-mer) was copied using the primers, YSU_mer_FWD (5′ ATCGGCAAATGGCAGGGACAGG 3′) and YSU_mer_REV (5′ TACGCCGGTGACAACACATCGC 3′). This reaction used genomic DNA from Enterobacter sp. YSU as a template. The reactions for all three mer operons used 65 °C for the annealing temperature and an extension time of 7 min. The S. maltophilia 02 copper-translocating P-type ATPase gene and the adjacent cueR gene was PCR amplified using the primers, CuR-ATPase2_1 (5′ CCAACCAGATCTCCACCAA 3′) and CuR-ATPase2_2 (5′ GGTGATCAATGCCACCAAGT 3′). S. maltophilia 02 genomic DNA was used as a template. The annealing temperature was 60 °C, and the extension time was 4 min. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was used as a template in reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) with the cueR_2_FWD (5′ CTCTGGAATGACACCTCGCGGC 3′) and cueR_2_REV (5′ CCATCTGCCGCATGTGCTCGAT 3′) primers for the cueR gene, the ATPase_2_FWD (5′ GTGCTGGAGATGGGTTCGCACC 3′) and ATPase_2_REV (5′ GCCGGGAAGCCCTTCTGGTAGA 3′) primers for the copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and the S02_GAPDH_F (5′ AAACCGCGCAGAAGCACATCGA 3′) and S02_GAPDH_R (5′ GCCGGCGTAGGTCTTGTCGTTC 3′) primers for the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) control. The annealing temperature for the ATPase gene, cueR and GAPDH was 57 °C, and the extension time was 30 s.

2.4. Transposon Mutagenesis, Cloning and DNA Purification

Zinc and copper mutants were generated by transposon mutagenesis using the EZ-Tn5™ <R6Kγori/KAN-2>Tnp Transposome™ Kit (Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA) as described previously [38,39,40], except mutants were screened using 1 mM ZnCl2 or 1 mM CuSO4 on R3A-tris medium [29] PCR DNA fragments were cloned using the StrataClone PCR Cloning Kit (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Genomic DNA was purified using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega), and plasmid DNA was purified using the Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System kit (Promega).

2.5. Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using a replica plating technique [24]. Bacterial colonies were gridded in triplicate on R3A-tris agar medium and grown overnight at 30 °C. For mercury MICS, the master plate was replica plated onto R3A-tris agar medium containing 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 µM HgCl2. After incubating the plates at 30 °C overnight, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the lowest concentration of mercury that prevented growth. Copper MICs were determined using a similar protocol, except colonies were gridded on LB agar plates and replica plated onto LB agar medium containing 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mM CuSO4. Zinc MIC’s were determined using R3A-tris agar medium for replica plating on 0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 4 and 5 mM ZnCl2. Cadmium MICs were determined using R3A-tris agar medium for replica plating on 0, 10, 50, 100, 200 and 300 µM CdCl2. Gold MICs were determined by replica plating on R3A-tris agar medium containing 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µM HAuCl4·3H2O.

2.6. RNA Purification, cDNA Synthesis and Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

An overnight culture of S. maltophilia 02 grown in LB medium was diluted 1:20 in fresh LB medium in three separate cultures and grown at 30 °C. After 1.5 h of growth, water was added to one tube as a control, HAuCl4·3H2O was added to a concentration of 200 µM to the second tube and CuSO4 was added to a concentration of 1 mM to the third tube. One hour after metal exposure, 100 μL of cells were added to 200 μL of RNAprotect® Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), pelleted and stored at −80 °C. Total RNA from thawed cells was purified using the Qiagen RNeasy® Protect Bacteria Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared from 93 ng of RNA using random primers and Protoscript from NEB (Bevery, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was PCR amplified as described above, and RT-PCR reactions were separated on a 2% agarose gel.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Potential MerR Sensors Switches in S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU

BLAST analysis using the Tn21 MerR amino acid residue sequence (accession P0A2Q9) against the protein databases from S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU revealed that S. maltophilia 02 contains two potential mercury resistance operons, and Enterobacter sp. YSU contains a single plasmid encoded mercury resistance operon (Figure 2a). The first S. maltophilia 02 mercury resistance operon (S02-mer1) contains merR, merT, merP, merA, merD and merE. The second operon (S02-mer2) contains merR, merT, merP, merC and merA. The Enterobacter sp. YSU mercury resistance operon (YSU-mer) contains merR, merT, merP, merC, merA, merD and merE.
To determine if these operons are functional, they were PCR amplified and cloned into plasmid, pSC-A-amp/kan, using the StrataClone PCR Cloning Kit to create the plasmids, pS02-mer1, pS02-mer2 and YSU-mer, respectively. The complete S02-mer1 and S02-mer2 operons were cloned, and most of the YSU-mer operon was cloned. Only part of merE was missing. Then, S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU colonies were spotted onto R3A-tris agar plates along with E. coli containing one of the three recombinant plasmids or pSC-A-amp/kan as a control. This master plate was replica plated onto R3A-tris agar plates containing different concentrations of HgCl2. S. maltophilia 02, Enterobacter sp. YSU and E. coli containing all three recombinant plasmids grew at HgCl2 concentrations of 70 µM and below but not at 80 to 100 µM. However, E. coli containing the pSC-A-amp/kan vector grew at 0 and 10 µM HgCl2 but at none of the other concentrations. Since the inserts increased the HgCl2 MICS, all three operons conferred resistance to mercury in E. coli.
All three mer operons appear to encode MerR switches that sense mercury (Figure 2b). MEGA software alignment of the MerR amino acid residue sequences with Tn21 MerR shows that all three have characteristic DNA binding domains, coupling domains and metal binding domains with three metal binding cysteine residues, a dimerization helix, a metal binding loop and a two-turn α-helix. MerR from the S02-mer1 operon (QPX92366) appears to be closely related to MerR from Tn21, and MerR from the S02-mer2 operon (QPX94025) appears to be more closely related to MerR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ALY42794.1). MerR from the YSU-mer operon appears to be more closely related to MerR from a plasmid of Enterobacter cloacae strain DH4 (QDS02919.1). MerR from YSU-mer was not annotated because it appears to be located on a plasmid that is at least 100 kb in size. Since the next-generation sequencing method used was not designed for plasmids, the sequence data for this plasmid was not uploaded to the NCBI database.
MEGA software alignment of the promoter regions of each operon shows that the −35 and −10 promoter regions are almost identical to those of the Tn21 promoter [41] with slight variations in the −10 promoter regions of S02-mer2 and YSU-mer (Figure 2c). They all contain a non-optimal 19 bp spacer between the −10 and −35 RNA polymerase binding sites. Like Tn21, the putative MerR binding-sites (operators) are all inverted repeats for S02-mer1 and S02-mer2. The inverted repeat for MerR in YSU-mer contains one mismatch. Overall, the similarities in the MerR protein structures and promoters in the S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU operons suggest that they could be coupled with a reporter gene to form effective whole-cell Hg(II) biosensors.

3.2. Potential Enterobacter sp. YSU Zinc Sensor Switch, ZntR

Transposon mutagenesis and BLAST analysis of the Enterobacter sp. YSU genome was used to identify an Enterobacter sp. YSU zinc resistance gene and a ZntR protein switch that activates expression in the presence of Zn(II). The EZ-Tn5 <R6Kγori/KAN-2> transposome consists of a transposon DNA fragment containing an R6Kγ replication origin and a kanamycin resistance gene flanked by mosaic ends for transposase enzyme binding [38,39,40]. The transposome is the transposon with transposase bound to the mosaic ends. When the transposome was introduced into Enterobacter sp. YSU, it randomly inserted the transposon into the bacterium’s genome, producing thousands of kanamycin-resistant colonies. After screening 1760 colonies on R3A-tris agar medium containing 1 mM ZnCl2, two zinc sensitive mutants, F24 and EI24, were identified. Purified genomic DNA from these mutants was digested with enzymes that do not cut the transposon, ligated and transformed into E. coli. The resulting transformants possessed a circular recombinant plasmid containing the transposon flanked by the interrupted genomic region. DNA sequencing and BLAST analysis against the Enterobacter sp. YSU genome showed that the transposon inserted itself into a gene that matched to the Zn(II)/Cd(II)/Pb(II) translocating P-type ATPase, ZntA (QPX99562), which confers resistance by pumping metal out of the cell (Figure 3a) [42].
The metal sensitive phenotype of F24 and EI24 was tested by replica plating. Enterobacter sp. YSU and each mutant was spotted in triplicate on R3A-tris agar plates without metal, grown overnight at 30 °C and replica plated onto R3A-tris agar plates containing different concentrations of ZnCl2, CdCl2 or Pb(NO3)2. After growing the plates overnight, the Zn(II) MIC for Enterobacter sp. YSU was between 4 and 5 mM, compared to between 0.2 and 0.3 mM for both mutants. The Cd(II) MIC for Enterobacter sp. YSU was between 0.2 and 0.3 mM compared to 0.01 and 0.05 mM for both mutants. The Pb(II) MIC for Enterobacter sp. YSU and the mutants was between 5 and 6 mM. Since the mutations decreased the Zn(II) and Cd(II) MICs but not the Pb(II) MIC, the Enterobacter sp. YSU zntA gene was required for zinc and cadmium resistance but not for lead resistance.
The Enterobacter sp. YSU ZntR protein (QPX99701) appears to be a MerR family switch that regulates the expression of the zntA gene [43]. Like E. coli, the gene for zntR is not adjacent to zntA and is located in a different region of the Enterobacter sp. YSU genome. The ZntR protein has the same structure as other MerR family protein switches [17]. MEGA software alignment with the E. coli ZntR protein (P0ACS5.1) shows that the Enterobacter sp. YSU ZntR protein contains a DNA binding domain, a coupling domain and a metal binding domain with a dimerization helix, a metal binding loop and a two-turn α-helix (Figure 3b). Two ZntR polypeptides exist as a dimer with four cysteine amino acid residues, C79, C114, C115 and C124, and one histidine amino acid residue, H119, forming one of two zinc binding domains, in which each domain binds to two Zn(II) cations. The dimerization helices form an antiparallel coiled coil so that C114, C115, H119 and C124 are supplied by one monomer and C79 is supplied by the other monomer.
The promoter for zntA in Enterobacter sp. YSU is similar to the promoter for zntA in E. coli (Figure 3a). Their −35 and −10 RNA polymerase binding sites are almost identical and instead of containing a 19 base pair non-optimal spacer between their −35 and −10 regions, they contain a 20 base pair non-optimal spacer [43]. Their ZntR binding, inverted repeats (operators) are identical. From these results, replacing the zntA gene with a reporter gene could produce a potential whole-cell biosensor for Zn(II) and Cd(II) cations.

3.3. Potential Enterobacter sp. YSU Copper Sensor Switch, CueR

Transposon mutagenesis of Enterobacter sp. YSU also yielded a copper sensitive mutant named LF88. In this case, BLAST analysis against the Enterobacter sp. YSU genome showed that the transposon inserted itself into a gene for a copper-exporting P-type ATPase, CopA (QPX98190) [44]. Replica plating showed that the MIC was between 2 and 3 mM CuSO4 for Enterobacter sp. YSU and between 0.1 and 0.5 mM CuSO4 for the LF88 mutant. Since E. coli copA expression is also induced in response to gold [45], the gold MIC was determined for Enterobacter sp. YSU and LF88. The MIC for Enterobacter sp. YSU and the LF88 mutant were both between 40 and 50 µM HAuCl4·3H2O. Since the wild type and mutant demonstrated no difference in gold resistance, the Enterobacter sp. YSU copA gene only appears to confer resistance to copper.
The Enterobacter sp. YSU CueR protein (QPX98189) appears to be a MerR family protein switch that regulates the expression of the copA gene [46]. The cueR gene is adjacent to copA and transcribed in the opposite direction in Enterobacter sp. YSU (Figure 4a). In E. coli, it is located in a different region of the chromosome. MEGA Software alignment of the E. coli CueR (WP_135301207.1) amino acid residue sequence with Enterobacter sp. YSU CueR suggests that the Enterobacter sp. YSU CueR protein contains similar MerR family DNA binding, coupling and metal binding domains (Figure 4b) [17]. After the cell reduces Cu(II) to Cu(I), CueR binds to Cu(I) using two cysteine amino acid residues, Cys112 and Cys120. The dimerization helices from two monomers are arranged in an antiparallel orientation to form a coiled coil in a homodimer, but the cysteine amino acid residue at position 77 is replaced by a serine amino acid residue, which is not involved in Cu(I) binding.
The copA promoter regions for E. coli and Enterobacter sp. YSU are similar (Figure 4a) [47]. They share identical −35 and −10 RNA polymerase binding regions, and inverted repeat CueR binding sites. Their non-optimal 19 base pair spacers differ by one base pair, and their transcription ATG start sites are different. Replacing the copA gene in Enterobacter sp. YSU with a reporter gene could produce a potential whole-cell Cu(II)/Cu(I) cation biosensor.

3.4. Potential S. maltophilia 02 Gold and Copper Sensor Switch, CueR

S. maltophilia 02 is resistant to HAuCl4·3H2O [29]. A BLAST search using the Salmonella enterica gold resistance protein GolT (QAX67042), a gold translocating P-type ATPase [48], against the S. maltophilia 02 genome identified a copper-translocating P-type ATPase (QPX92549) that was 83% similar to GolT. The gene for the S. maltophilia P-type ATPase along with the adjacent gene for a MerR family protein, CueR (QPX92548), was PCR amplified (Figure 5a) and cloned into the vector plasmid, pSC-A-amp/kan. Replica plating onto different concentrations of gold and copper measured levels of resistance. The MIC for S. maltophilia 02 was between 2 and 3 mM for CuSO4 and between 30 and 40 µM for HAuCl4·3H2O. The MIC for E. coli containing the pSC-A-amp/kan vector and the vector with the ATPase/cueR insert was between 0.5 and 1 mM for CuSO4 and between 10 and 20 µM for HAuCl4·3H2O. Since the insert did not increase the MICs for either metal, it did not confer resistance to copper or gold when introduced into E. coli.
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to see if the genes for the S. maltophilia 02 P-Type ATPase and cueR are expressed in response to copper and gold. Cultures of S. maltophilia were grown to early mid-log phase and exposed to 200 µM HAuCl4·3H2O, 1 mM CuSO4 or an equal volume of water. After 1 h of exposure, cells were harvested for RNA purification, and 93 ng of RNA was converted to cDNA using reverse transcriptase. PCR reactions were performed using the cDNA as a template and primers for the GAPDH gene as a housekeeping control, for the ATPase gene and for the cueR gene. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that the expression levels for both the ATPase gene (Figure 6a) and cueR (Figure 6b) increased in response to copper and gold because the intensity of the DNA bands in lanes 2 (copper treated) and 3 (gold treated) are greater than the intensity of the DNA bands in lane 1 (water control). The equal intensity in DNA bands for the GAPDH housekeeping gene (Figure 6c) under all conditions confirmed that equal amounts of RNA were used for all conditions. Thus, it appears that the S. maltophilia 02 CueR switch protein regulates expression of both the ATPase gene and itself, repressing expression in the absence of metal and inducing it in the presence of copper and gold.
The S. enterica protein, GolS (QAX67041), is a MerR family protein switch, which activates the expression of golTS in the presence of HAuCl4·3H2O [49]. MEGA software alignment of the GolS protein with the S. maltophilia 02 and the E. coli CueR proteins show that they possess the typical MerR family DNA binding, coupling and metal binding domains (Figure 5b) [48,50]. The S. maltophilia 02 CueR protein is more related to GolS than it is to E. coli CueR in the DNA binding helix, coupling domain helix and 2-turn α-helix but less similar in the dimerization helix. Inside the cell, Au(III) is reduced to Au(I). Then, similar to CueR binding to Cu(I), GolS binds to Au(I) using two cysteine amino acid residues at positions Cys 112 and Cys120.
The S. maltophilia P-type ATPase gene promoter region is also similar to the golTS promoter region [51,52]. The −35 and −10 promoter regions of the S. maltophilia 02 P-type ATPase are almost identical to the −35 and −10 golTS promoter regions. They also both have a non-optimal 19 bp spacer and almost identical inverted repeats for DNA binding by CueR. From these results, replacing the S. maltophilia 02 P-type ATPase gene with a reporter gene and leaving the cueR gene intact could produce a potential Au(I)/Au(III) and Cu(I)/Cu(II) cation biosensor.

3.5. Other Reporter Genes for MerR Family Biosensors

In addition to the gene for β-galactosidase, there are other genes that may serve as reporters in whole-cell biosensors [1,2,3,25,53,54,55,56]. Several investigators used bioluminescence to detect metals. Luciferase is a protein that gives off light. For example, Selifonova et al. used a luciferase reporter to measure Hg(NO3)2 at nanomolar and micromolar concentrations [57] and were able to increase the sensitivity to picomolar concentrations by decreasing the number of cells in the assay [58]. Light emissions were measured using a scintillation counter with linear readings ranging between 105 and 107 quanta/sec/mL. Brocklehurst et al. replaced the zntA gene in E. coli with the luciferase genes and were able to detect Zn(II) concentrations between 0.1 µM and 1.1 mM using a luminometer to detect light emissions [43]. Other investigators used the gene for the green fluorescence protein (GFP) as a reporter. When exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light, GFP fluoresces green. Pang et al. replaced the copA gene with the GFP gene in E. coli and detected CuSO4 concentrations between 0.39 and 78.68 μM [59]. Fluorescence was measured using a fluorescence spectrometer with linear readings ranging between 50 and 500 absolute fluorescence units (AFU). Özyurt et al. linked MerR to the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) so that EYFP was inactive when MerR was not bound to Hg(II) and became active due to conformational changes when MerR bound Hg(II) [60]. The purified chimeric protein detected Hg(II) concentrations between 0.5 and 40 nM.

3.6. Improving the Sensitivity and Specificity of MerR Family Biosensors

Sensitivity can be improved if the resistance genes, such as merA, zntA, copA and golT, are deleted from the host’s genome. When they are intact, they remove the metal and keep the concentration inside the cell low. The MerR family switch then requires more metal to activate the reporter gene, decreasing the sensitivity of the biosensor. Pang et al. removed the copA gene from E. coli to improve the sensitivity of copper detection [59]. All MerR family metal biosensors require deletion of the original resistance genes, but keeping their promoters. This problem may also be solved by constructing a recombinant plasmid which contains the switch protein gene along with its target promoter which controls the expression of a reporter gene. Then, introducing it into a bacterial strain that lacks the resistance genes will improve the sensitivity of the assay.
Metal specificity is important for detecting specific metals without interference by other metals. A previous random mutagenesis study of MerR to identify mutants that recognized Cd(II) instead of Hg(II) mainly resulted in constitutive expression [61]. Mutants that did induce expression in response to Cd(II) demonstrated some expression in the absence of metal and even higher levels of expression in the presence of Cd(II) and Hg(II). Recently, Hakkila et al. successfully mutagenized merR so that it will selectively respond to Cd(II) [62]. Most of the modifications were in the second coupling domain helix, at each end of the dimerization helix, in the metal binding loop and in the 2-turn α-helix. Kim et al. mutated the metal binding loop of ZntR so that it induced expression in response to Cd(II), Hg(II) and Pb(II) [63]. Recently, Ibáñez et al. showed that the metal binding loop is important for metal specificity in Salmonella [48,64]. They removed the metal binding loop region in GolS and replaced it with the metal binding loop region of CueR. The chimeric protein responded to both gold and copper when the wild type only responded to gold. In addition, changing serine at position 77 to cysteine in the N-terminal end of the dimerization helix of GolS and CueR maintained their response to gold and copper, and increased their response to the divalent cations, mercury, zinc, cadmium, and lead [64].
MerR family protein DNA binding domains may also be exchanged to change the specificity of the biosensor. Brockelhurst et al. swapped out the DNA binding domain of ZntR with the DNA binding region of MerR [43]. This chimeric protein strongly induced expression from the merTPCADE promoter in response to Zn(II) and demonstrated a weaker to response to Hg(II). Humbert et al. performed a similar experiment with CueR and GolS using a lacZ reporter [51]. They exchanged DNA binding domains between these two proteins so that the CueR chimeric protein induced expression from a gold resistance promoter in the presence of copper and gold, and the GolS chimeric protein induced expression from a copper resistance promoter in the presence of copper and gold. Thus, specificity can be modified by swapping domains or modifying the amino acid residue sequence in the MerR family protein of interest.
There are several advantages to using whole-cell biosensors [65,66]. Bacterial biosensors cells are inexpensive, easy to grow and can be produced in high amounts in a short period of time. This allows for the possibility of performing high-throughput assays to analyze many samples at a time [67]. The equipment that detects reporter gene signals are less expensive, requires less training and tends to be more portable than other metal analyzing instruments. Biosensor assays also save time because sample processing before analysis is minimal compared to other analytical techniques. In addition, whole-cell biosensors with MerR family switch proteins that have different levels of specificities can be combined. A low specificity switch protein which activates reporter gene expression in response to multiple metals can be used to detect overall metal contamination. If there are a large number of samples to analyze, those that do not contain metal can be eliminated. Then, whole-cell biosensors with more selective switch proteins can be used to detect specific metals. Finally, whole-cell biosensors only detect bioavailable metals [57]. Other methods detect both the bioavailable and the inert presence of metal, making it difficult to accurately assess the safety of an environmental sample. Thus, whole-cell biosensors provide an easy and inexpensive way to determine the metal content of a sample, and the results can be further refined using more precise analytical techniques.

4. Conclusions

S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU have the potential to be used as whole-cell biosensors for the detection of metals such as mercury, zinc, copper and gold. We hypothesized that these multimetal resistant bacterial strains would use MerR family activator/repressor protein switches to regulate metal resistance operons, and sequencing of their genomes supported this prediction. Gene cloning, transposon mutagenesis, MIC experiments and RT-PCR suggested that S. maltophilia 02 contains genes for MerR and CueR, which regulate operons for mercury, gold and copper resistance, respectively. They also suggested that Enterobacter sp. YSU contains genes for MerR, ZntR and CueR, which regulate operons for mercury, zinc and copper resistance, respectively. Replacing the resistance genes with reporter genes such as, β-galactosidase, luciferase or GFP can make them potential biosensors for these metals. Each MerR family protein has a DNA binding domain, coupling domain, and a metal binding domain. Modifying regions in the metal-binding domain or swapping metal binding or DNA binding domains between MerR family proteins can enhance the sensitivity and specificity for metal detection. To use the MerR family proteins from S. maltophila 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU as whole-cell biosensors, their genes will need to be modified.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; methodology, J.C.; investigation, J.C., G.B., V.N.; data curation, J.C., G.B., S.M., V.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; visualization, J.C., G.B.; supervision, J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Youngstown State University (YSU) Department of Biological Sciences, a YSU University Research Council (URC) Grant and the Choose Ohio First program.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Xiangjia Min for assistance with sequence analysis. We would also like to thank the numerous undergraduate students who participated in this study for research credit or as a participant in the Choose Ohio First Program: Emily Bosler, Monica Davis, Kaylea Dillon, Amy Quinones, Gabriella Hosack, Haley Gianfrancesco, Hanna Gilligan and Dionne Trammell.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Checa, S.K.; Zurbriggen, M.D.; Soncini, F.C. Bacterial signaling systems as platforms for rational design of new generations of biosensors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hakkila, K.; Maksimow, M.; Karp, M.; Virta, M. Reporter genes lucFF, luxCDABE, gfp, and dsred have different characteristics in whole-cell bacterial sensors. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 301, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Jouanneau, S.; Durand, M.-J.; Courcoux, P.; Blusseau, T.; Thouand, G. Improvement of the identification of four heavy metals in environmental samples by using predictive decision tree models coupled with a set of five bioluminescent bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 2925–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grinsted, J.; de la Cruz, F.; Schmitt, R. The Tn21 subgroup of bacterial transposable elements. Plasmid 1990, 24, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shewchuk, L.M.; Verdine, G.L.; Walsh, C.T. Transcriptional switching by the metalloregulatory MerR protein: Initial characterization of DNA and mercury (II) binding activities. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 2331–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shewchuk, L.M.; Helmann, J.D.; Ross, W.; Park, S.J.; Summers, A.O.; Walsh, C.T. Transcriptional switching by the MerR protein: Activation and repression mutants implicate distinct DNA and mercury (II) binding domains. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 2340–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liebert, C.A.; Hall, R.M.; Summers, A.O. Transposon Tn21, flagship of the floating genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Nascimento, A.M.; Chartone-Souza, E. Operon mer: Bacterial resistance to mercury and potential for bioremediation of contaminated environments. Genet. Mol. Res. 2003, 2, 92–101. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiyono, M.; Sone, Y.; Nakamura, R.; Pan-Hou, H.; Sakabe, K. The MerE protein encoded by transposon Tn21 is a broad mercury transporter in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1127–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hamlett, N.V.; Landale, E.C.; Davis, B.H.; Summers, A.O. Roles of the Tn21 merT, merP, and merC gene products in mercury resistance and mercury binding. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 6377–6385. [Google Scholar]
  11. Silver, S.; Phung, L.T. Bacterial heavy metal resistance: New surprises. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50, 753–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Summers, A.O. Untwist and shout: A heavy metal-responsive transcriptional regulator. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 3097–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mukhopadhyay, D.; Yu, H.R.; Nucifora, G.; Misra, T.K. Purification and functional characterization of MerD. A coregulator of the mercury resistance operon in Gram-negative bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 18538–18542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Champier, L.; Duarte, V.; Michaud-Soret, I.; Covès, J. Characterization of the MerD protein from Ralstonia metallidurans CH34: A possible role in bacterial mercury resistance by switching off the induction of the mer operon. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 1475–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, D.; Huang, S.; Liu, P.; Liu, X.; He, Y.; Chen, W.; Hu, Q.; Wei, T.; Gan, J.; Ma, J.; et al. Structural analysis of the Hg(II)-regulatory protein Tn501 MerR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, L.-Y.; Zou, X.-W.; Huang, C.-C.; Chan, N.-L. Structural basis of the mercury (II)-mediated conformational switching of the dual-function transcriptional regulator MerR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 7612–7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Changela, A.; Chen, K.; Xue, Y.; Holschen, J.; Outten, C.E.; O’Halloran, T.V.; Mondragon, A. Molecular basis of metal-ion selectivity and zeptomolar sensitivity by CueR. Science 2003, 301, 1383–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zeng, Q.; Stalhandske, C.; Anderson, M.C.; Scott, R.A.; Summers, A.O. The core metal-recognition domain of MerR. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 15885–15895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aoyama, T.; Takanami, M.; Ohtsuka, E.; Taniyama, Y.; Marumoto, R.; Sato, H.; Ikehara, M. Essential structure of E. coli promoter: Effect of spacer length between the two consensus sequences on promoter function. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11, 5855–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Parkhill, J.; Brown, N.L. Site-specific insertion and deletion mutants in the mer promoter-operator region of Tn501; the nineteen base-pair spacer is essential for normal induction of the promoter by MerR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 5157–5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Guo, H.-B.; Johs, A.; Parks, J.M.; Olliff, L.; Miller, S.M.; Summers, A.O.; Liang, L.; Smith, J.C. Structure and conformational dynamics of the metalloregulator MerR upon binding of Hg(II). J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 398, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ansari, A.Z.; Bradner, J.E.; O’Halloran, T.V. DNA-bend modulation in a repressor-to-activator switching mechanism. Nature 1995, 374, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ross, W.; Park, S.J.; Summers, A.O. Genetic analysis of transcriptional activation and repression in the Tn21 mer operon. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 4009–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Miller, J.H. A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Related Bacteria; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Plainview, NY, USA, 1992; ISBN 0-87969-349-5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hansen, L.H.; Sørensen, S.J. Versatile biosensor vectors for detection and quantification of mercury. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 193, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories; (EPA 822-F-18-001); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  27. Hobman, J.L. MerR family transcription activators: Similar designs, different specificities. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1275–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, N.L.; Stoyanov, J.V.; Kidd, S.P.; Hobman, J.L. The MerR family of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Holmes, A.; Vinayak, A.; Benton, C.; Esbenshade, A.; Heinselman, C.; Frankland, D.; Kulkarni, S.; Kurtanich, A.; Caguiat, J. Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Metcalf, W.W.; Jiang, W.; Wanner, B.L. Use of the rep technique for allele replacement to construct new Escherichia coli hosts for maintenance of R6Kλ origin plasmids at different copy numbers. Gene 1994, 138, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Darling, A.C.E.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tatusova, T.A.; Madden, T.L. BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 174, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haft, D.H.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Brover, V.; Chetvernin, V.; O’Neill, K.; Li, W.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. RefSeq: An update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D851–D860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tatusova, T.; Di Cuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goryshin, I.Y.; Jendrisak, J.; Hoffman, L.M.; Meis, R.; Reznikoff, W.S. Insertional transposon mutagenesis by electroporation of released Tn5 transposition complexes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hoffman, L.M.; Jendrisak, J.J.; Meis, R.J.; Goryshin, I.Y.; Reznikoff, W.S. Transposome insertional mutagenesis and direct sequencing of microbial genomes. Genetica 2000, 108, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Caguiat, J.J. Generation of Enterobacter sp. YSU auxotrophs using transposon mutagenesis. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, e51934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Heltzel, A.; Lee, I.W.; Totis, P.A.; Summers, A.O. Activator-dependent preinduction binding of σ-70 RNA polymerase at the metal-regulated mer promoter. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 9572–9584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Capdevila, D.A.; Wang, J.; Giedroc, D.P. Bacterial strategies to maintain zinc metallostasis at the host-pathogen interface. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 20858–20868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brocklehurst, K.R.; Hobman, J.L.; Lawley, B.; Blank, L.; Marshall, S.J.; Brown, N.L.; Morby, A.P. ZntR is a Zn(II)-responsive MerR-like transcriptional regulator of zntA in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rensing, C.; Fan, B.; Sharma, R.; Mitra, B.; Rosen, B.P. CopA: An Escherichia coli Cu(I)-translocating P-type ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Stoyanov, J.V.; Browns, N.L. The Escherichia coli copper-responsive copA promoter is activated by gold. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 1407–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Fang, C.; Philips, S.J.; Wu, X.; Chen, K.; Shi, J.; Shen, L.; Xu, J.; Feng, Y.; O’Halloran, T.V.; Zhang, Y. CueR activates transcription through a DNA distortion mechanism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2021, 17, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stoyanov, J.V.; Hobman, J.L.; Brown, N.L. CueR (YbbI) of Escherichia coli is a MerR family regulator controlling expression of the copper exporter CopA. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Checa, S.K.; Espariz, M.; Audero, M.E.P.; Botta, P.E.; Spinelli, S.V.; Soncini, F.C. Bacterial sensing of and resistance to gold salts. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1307–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pontel, L.B.; Audero, M.E.P.; Espariz, M.; Checa, S.K.; Soncini, F.C. GolS controls the response to gold by the hierarchical induction of Salmonella-specific genes that include a CBA efflux-coding operon. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Espariz, M.; Checa, S.K.; Audero, M.E.P.; Pontel, L.B.; Soncini, F.C. Dissecting the Salmonella response to copper. Microbiology 2007, 153, 2989–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Humbert, M.V.; Rasia, R.M.; Checa, S.K.; Soncini, F.C. Protein signatures that promote operator selectivity among paralog MerR monovalent metal ion regulators. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 20510–20519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Pérez Audero, M.E.; Podoroska, B.M.; Ibáñez, M.M.; Cauerhff, A.; Checa, S.K.; Soncini, F.C. Target transcription binding sites differentiate two groups of MerR-monovalent metal ion sensors. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 78, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alkorta, I.; Epelde, L.; Mijangos, I.; Amezaga, I.; Garbisu, C. Bioluminescent bacterial biosensors for the assessment of metal toxicity and bioavailability in soils. Rev. Environ. Health 2006, 21, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kang, Y.; Lee, W.; Kim, S.; Jang, G.; Kim, B.-G.; Yoon, Y. Enhancing the copper-sensing capability of Escherichia coli-based whole-cell bioreporters by genetic engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Priyadarshi, H.; Alam, A.; Gireesh-Babu, P.; Das, R.; Kishore, P.; Kumar, S.; Chaudhari, A. A GFP-based bacterial biosensor with chromosomally integrated sensing cassette for quantitative detection of Hg(II) in environment. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stoyanov, J.V.; Magnani, D.; Solioz, M. Measurement of cytoplasmic copper, silver, and gold with a lux biosensor shows copper and silver, but not gold, efflux by the CopA ATPase of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2003, 546, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Selifonova, O.; Burlage, R.; Barkay, T. Bioluminescent sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(II) in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 3083–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Rasmussen, L.D.; Turner, R.R.; Barkay, T. Cell-density-dependent sensitivity of a mer-lux bioassay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 3291–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pang, Y.; Ren, X.; Li, J.; Liang, F.; Rao, X.; Gao, Y.; Wu, W.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.; et al. Development of a sensitive Escherichia coli bioreporter without antibiotic markers for detecting bioavailable copper in water environments. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Özyurt, C.; Üstükarcı, H.; Evran, S.; Telefoncu, A. MerR-fluorescent protein chimera biosensor for fast and sensitive detection of Hg2+ in drinking water. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2019, 66, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Caguiat, J.; Watson, A.; Summers, A. Cd(II)-responsive and constitutive mutants implicate a novel domain in MerR. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 3462–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hakkila, K.M.; Nikander, P.A.; Junttila, S.M.; Lamminmäki, U.J.; Virta, M.P. Cd-specific mutants of mercury-sensing regulatory protein MerR, generated by directed evolution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6215–6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kim, H.; Jang, G.; Kim, B.G.; Yoon, Y. Modulation of the metal(loid) specificity of whole-cell bioreporters by genetic engineering of ZntR metal-binding loops. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ibáñez, M.M.; Checa, S.K.; Soncini, F.C. A single serine residue determines selectivity to monovalent metal ions in metalloregulators of the MerR family. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 1606–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Van der Meer, J.R.; Belkin, S. Where microbiology meets microengineering: Design and applications of reporter bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Turdean, G.L. Design and development of biosensors for the detection of heavy metal toxicity. Int. J. Electrochem. 2011, 2011, 343125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Melamed, S.; Elad, T.; Belkin, S. Microbial sensor cell arrays. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Micromachines 12 00142 g001 550
Figure 1. The Tn21 mercury resistance (mer) operon and MerR protein activator/repressor switch. (a) The genes merTPCAD are transcribed to the right and merR is transcribed to the left. The MerR protein binds as a dimer to the DNA operator region (underlined) between the −10 and −35 RNA polymerase binding regions (highlighted in black). The non-optimal 19 base pair (bp) spacer between the −10 and −35 regions prevents RNA polymerase from initiating transcription efficiently. In the absence of Hg(II), MerR binding to the DNA acts as an off switch to repress transcription. In the presence of Hg(II), MerR acts as an on switch by shortening the distance between and aligning the −10 and −35 regions so that RNA polymerase can initiate transcription of the merTPCAD genes efficiently. Transcription begins at the nucleotide base (bold) below + in +1. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left marks the beginning of MerR translation. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of MerT translation. (b) The Tn21 MerR amino acid residue primary sequence. The helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of the dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The dimerization helix links two identical MerR polypeptides to form an antiparallel coiled coil. The # below the sequences designates conserved cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Hg(II). The * and numbers above the MerR primary sequence denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Figure 1. The Tn21 mercury resistance (mer) operon and MerR protein activator/repressor switch. (a) The genes merTPCAD are transcribed to the right and merR is transcribed to the left. The MerR protein binds as a dimer to the DNA operator region (underlined) between the −10 and −35 RNA polymerase binding regions (highlighted in black). The non-optimal 19 base pair (bp) spacer between the −10 and −35 regions prevents RNA polymerase from initiating transcription efficiently. In the absence of Hg(II), MerR binding to the DNA acts as an off switch to repress transcription. In the presence of Hg(II), MerR acts as an on switch by shortening the distance between and aligning the −10 and −35 regions so that RNA polymerase can initiate transcription of the merTPCAD genes efficiently. Transcription begins at the nucleotide base (bold) below + in +1. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left marks the beginning of MerR translation. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of MerT translation. (b) The Tn21 MerR amino acid residue primary sequence. The helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of the dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The dimerization helix links two identical MerR polypeptides to form an antiparallel coiled coil. The # below the sequences designates conserved cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Hg(II). The * and numbers above the MerR primary sequence denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Micromachines 12 00142 g001
Micromachines 12 00142 g002 550
Figure 2. The S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU mercury resistance (mer) operons and MerR protein activator/repressor switches. (a) Mercury resistance operons in S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU. The genes between the primers were copied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cloned and tested for the Hg(II) resistance phenotype. (b) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU MerR secondary structure using the Tn21, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae plasmid DWH4 MerR amino acid residue primary sequences. Each contain a DNA binding domain, a coupling domain and a metal binding domain. The # below the sequences designates conserved cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Hg(II). The * and numbers above the MerR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues. (c) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU mer promoter regions using the Tn21 mer promoter. All appear to contain non-optimal 19-bp spacers and MerR binding regions between the −10 and −35 region. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. Transcription begins at the nucleotide base (bold) below + in +1. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left marks the beginning of MerR translation. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of MerT translation.
Figure 2. The S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU mercury resistance (mer) operons and MerR protein activator/repressor switches. (a) Mercury resistance operons in S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU. The genes between the primers were copied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cloned and tested for the Hg(II) resistance phenotype. (b) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU MerR secondary structure using the Tn21, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae plasmid DWH4 MerR amino acid residue primary sequences. Each contain a DNA binding domain, a coupling domain and a metal binding domain. The # below the sequences designates conserved cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Hg(II). The * and numbers above the MerR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues. (c) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 and Enterobacter sp. YSU mer promoter regions using the Tn21 mer promoter. All appear to contain non-optimal 19-bp spacers and MerR binding regions between the −10 and −35 region. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. Transcription begins at the nucleotide base (bold) below + in +1. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left marks the beginning of MerR translation. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of MerT translation.
Micromachines 12 00142 g002
Micromachines 12 00142 g003 550
Figure 3. The Enterobacter sp. YSU zinc resistance (znt) operon and the ZntR activator/repressor switch. (a) The Enterobacter sp. YSU zntA gene and its predicted promoter region using the E. coli zntA promoter region. The gene for zntR is not adjacent to zntA and is located on a different region of the chromosome. An arrow indicates the Tn5 transposon insertion sites in zntA. It inserted in almost the same site for both mutants. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 20 bp spacer region and a ZntR binding site (underlined arrows) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of ZntA translation. (b) Prediction of the Enterobacter sp. YSU ZntR secondary structure using the E. coli ZntR amino acid residue primary sequence. Like MerR, the ZntR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, a metal binding loop and a 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli ZntR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine and histidine amino acid residues which bind to Zn(II). The * and numbers above the ZntR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Figure 3. The Enterobacter sp. YSU zinc resistance (znt) operon and the ZntR activator/repressor switch. (a) The Enterobacter sp. YSU zntA gene and its predicted promoter region using the E. coli zntA promoter region. The gene for zntR is not adjacent to zntA and is located on a different region of the chromosome. An arrow indicates the Tn5 transposon insertion sites in zntA. It inserted in almost the same site for both mutants. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 20 bp spacer region and a ZntR binding site (underlined arrows) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of ZntA translation. (b) Prediction of the Enterobacter sp. YSU ZntR secondary structure using the E. coli ZntR amino acid residue primary sequence. Like MerR, the ZntR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, a metal binding loop and a 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli ZntR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine and histidine amino acid residues which bind to Zn(II). The * and numbers above the ZntR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Micromachines 12 00142 g003
Micromachines 12 00142 g004 550
Figure 4. The Enterobacter sp. YSU copper resistance operon and the CueR activator/repressor switch. (a) The Enterobacter sp. YSU copA gene and its predicted promoter region using the E. coli copA promoter region. The gene for cueR is adjacent to copA in Enterobacter sp. YSU but not in E. coli. An arrow indicates the Tn5 transposon insertion site in copA. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 19 bp spacer region and a CueR binding site (underlined) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left of the YSU_copA sequence marks the beginning of CueR translation in Enterobacter sp. YSU. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of CopA translation in both strains. (b) Prediction of the Enterobacter sp. YSU CueR secondary structure using the E. coli CueR amino acid residue primary sequence. Like MerR, the CueR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli CueR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Cu(I). The * and numbers above the CueR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Figure 4. The Enterobacter sp. YSU copper resistance operon and the CueR activator/repressor switch. (a) The Enterobacter sp. YSU copA gene and its predicted promoter region using the E. coli copA promoter region. The gene for cueR is adjacent to copA in Enterobacter sp. YSU but not in E. coli. An arrow indicates the Tn5 transposon insertion site in copA. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 19 bp spacer region and a CueR binding site (underlined) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The first three base pairs, CAT, on the far left of the YSU_copA sequence marks the beginning of CueR translation in Enterobacter sp. YSU. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of CopA translation in both strains. (b) Prediction of the Enterobacter sp. YSU CueR secondary structure using the E. coli CueR amino acid residue primary sequence. Like MerR, the CueR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli CueR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Cu(I). The * and numbers above the CueR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Micromachines 12 00142 g004
Micromachines 12 00142 g005 550
Figure 5. The S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and CueR activator/repressor switch. (a) The S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and its predicted promoter region using the S. enterica golT, and the E. coli copA promoter regions. The gene for cueR is adjacent to and transcribed after the ATPase gene in S. maltophilia 02. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 19 bp spacer region and a CueR binding site (underlined) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of ATPase translation. (b) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 CueR secondary structure using the S. enterica GolS and the E. coli CueR amino acid residue primary sequences. Like MerR, the CueR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli CueR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Au(I) and Cu(I). The * and numbers above the Gols and CueR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Figure 5. The S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and CueR activator/repressor switch. (a) The S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and its predicted promoter region using the S. enterica golT, and the E. coli copA promoter regions. The gene for cueR is adjacent to and transcribed after the ATPase gene in S. maltophilia 02. The promoter region contains a non-optimal 19 bp spacer region and a CueR binding site (underlined) between the predicted −10 and −35 regions. Identical nucleotides in the −10 and −35 regions are highlighted in black. The last three base pairs, ATG, on the far right marks the beginning of ATPase translation. (b) Prediction of the S. maltophilia 02 CueR secondary structure using the S. enterica GolS and the E. coli CueR amino acid residue primary sequences. Like MerR, the CueR helix-turn-helix domain binds to the operator region of the promoter in the DNA. The coupling domain links the DNA binding domain to the metal binding domain. The metal binding domain consists of a dimerization helix, metal binding loop and 2-turn α-helix. The amino acids residues that are highlighted in black are identical to amino acid residues in the helices of E. coli CueR. The # below the sequences designates cysteine amino acid residues which bind to Au(I) and Cu(I). The * and numbers above the Gols and CueR primary sequences denote the position of every 10 amino acid residues.
Micromachines 12 00142 g005
Micromachines 12 00142 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression of the S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and cueR. During exponential growth, S. maltophilia 02 was exposed to 1 mM CuSO4, 200 µM HAuCl4·3H2O or no metal in three separate cultures. One hour after exposure, total RNA was purified from each culture and converted to cDNA using reverse transcriptase. The cDNA was then PCR amplified using primers specific for the copper P-type ATPase translocation gene, the cueR gene and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. The PCR reactions were separated using a 2% agarose gel. (a) The copper P-type ATPase translocation gene, (b) cueR and (c) GAPDH. (Lane 1) no metal, (Lane 2) copper and (Lane 3) gold. The more intense bands for copper and gold suggest that expression of the ATPase and cueR genes increases in response to copper and gold.
Figure 6. Expression of the S. maltophilia 02 copper translocating P-type ATPase gene and cueR. During exponential growth, S. maltophilia 02 was exposed to 1 mM CuSO4, 200 µM HAuCl4·3H2O or no metal in three separate cultures. One hour after exposure, total RNA was purified from each culture and converted to cDNA using reverse transcriptase. The cDNA was then PCR amplified using primers specific for the copper P-type ATPase translocation gene, the cueR gene and the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. The PCR reactions were separated using a 2% agarose gel. (a) The copper P-type ATPase translocation gene, (b) cueR and (c) GAPDH. (Lane 1) no metal, (Lane 2) copper and (Lane 3) gold. The more intense bands for copper and gold suggest that expression of the ATPase and cueR genes increases in response to copper and gold.
Micromachines 12 00142 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baya, G.; Muhindi, S.; Ngendahimana, V.; Caguiat, J. Potential Whole-Cell Biosensors for Detection of Metal Using MerR Family Proteins from Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR02. Micromachines 2021, 12, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020142

AMA Style

Baya G, Muhindi S, Ngendahimana V, Caguiat J. Potential Whole-Cell Biosensors for Detection of Metal Using MerR Family Proteins from Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR02. Micromachines. 2021; 12(2):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baya, Georgina, Stephen Muhindi, Valentine Ngendahimana, and Jonathan Caguiat. 2021. "Potential Whole-Cell Biosensors for Detection of Metal Using MerR Family Proteins from Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR02" Micromachines 12, no. 2: 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020142

APA Style

Baya, G., Muhindi, S., Ngendahimana, V., & Caguiat, J. (2021). Potential Whole-Cell Biosensors for Detection of Metal Using MerR Family Proteins from Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR02. Micromachines, 12(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop