Next Article in Journal
Negative Pressure Provides Simple and Stable Droplet Generation in a Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Structuring by Laser Remelting (WaveShape): Microstructuring of Ti6Al4V for a Small Laser Beam Diameter and High Scan Speeds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimal n-Type Al-Doped ZnO Overlayers for Charge Transport Enhancement in p-Type Cu2O Photocathodes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Damage Effect of ALD-Al2O3 Based Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures under Gamma-Ray Irradiation

The College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
Micromachines 2021, 12(6), 661; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12060661
Submission received: 28 February 2021 / Revised: 27 May 2021 / Accepted: 1 June 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021

Abstract

:
The radiation response of Al2O3 on silicon substrate under gamma-rays is studied in this article. The atomic layer deposited Al2O3 based metal-oxide-semiconductor structures were irradiated under gamma-ray with the total dose of 1.2 Mrad(Si)/2.5 Mrad(Si)/4 Mrad(Si). The generation, transportation and trapping characteristics of radiation induced charges were studied by using electronic, physical and chemical methods. Firstly, the radiation induced trapped charge density in Al2O3 is up to 1012 cm−2, with the effective trapping efficiency of 7–20% under irradiation. Secondly, the leakage current through Al2O3 changes little with the increase of radiation total dose. Thirdly, oxygen vacancy in Al2O3 and O dangling bonds and Al-Si metallic bonds at Al2O3/Si interface are dominant radiation induced defects in Al2O3/Si system, and the valence band offset between Al2O3 and Si is found to decrease after irradiation. From the results we can see that Al2O3 is radiation resistant from the aspect of leakage current and crystallization characteristics, but the radiation induced charge trapping and new defects in Al2O3/Si structure cannot be ignored. This paper provides a reference for the space application of Al2O3 based MOS devices.

1. Introduction

Microelectronic technology has been developing through the ‘Moore’s Law’ for several past decades and the feature size of the transistors in devices are reducing continuously. For now, the critical size of the transistors in advanced microelectronic devices has been shrinking to the point that the thickness of the gate dielectric of MOS(Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor) is comparable to several atoms size. The scaling of the microelectronic devices calls for new materials such as high-k materials for the gate dielectric and low-k materials for interconnecting technology. It also demands novel structures such as fin field-effect transistor, fully depleted silicon-on-insulator transistor and two-dimensional material devices and so on.
In advanced MOS devices, SiO2, which is widely used as the gate material in traditional MOS devices, is not applicable anymore as the leakage current and static power consumption would increase dramatically when the thickness of SiO2 decreases to lower than 2 nm, which would seriously impact the properties of MOS devices. Alternative materials with higher permittivity which can be called high-k materials have been proposed to replace SiO2 as the gate dielectric such as HfO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, La2O3 [1,2]. High-k materials that can be used as the gate dielectric in MOS devices must have a relatively larger bandgap to ensure large enough conduction band offset and valence band offset between the gate dielectric and the semiconductor substrate, which can restrict the charge transport and then reduce the leakage current of the device. Secondly, the high-k materials should be thermodynamically stable to avoid an interface layer forming from the chemical reaction on the dielectric/substrate interface. Thirdly, the high-k material should be electrically stable to prevent the generation of interface traps between the dielectric material and the substrate. Considering this, Al2O3 has been proposed as a promising candidate to replace SiO2 as the gate dielectric of MOS devices, with the relative dielectric constant around 8.9 and band gap around 8.7 eV that are both larger than that of SiO2. The higher dielectric constant ensures that the Al2O3 gate dielectric has large enough physical thickness to prevent charge tunneling through it. The larger band gap can guarantee that the conduction band offset and valence band offset between Al2O3 and the substrate are large enough to build sufficiently high electron and hole barriers on the interface to achieve relatively low leakage current and higher device performance.
Advanced MOS devices usually comprise different materials which are capable to withstand higher temperatures during technological treatment such as (HfO2)x(Al2O3)(1−x)/Si MOS structures. Al has been proposed to alloy HfO2 to raise the thermal stability and it was proven that the comprised gate dielectric with HfO2 and Al2O3 had higher crystallization temperature [3]. On the other hand, the resistance to oxygen diffusion of HfO2 was also improved by adding Al to form Hf aluminates, as Al2O3 has much lower oxygen diffusion coefficient than HfO2 at higher temperature [4].
Many researchers have studied the application of Al2O3 used as gate dielectrics in MOS devices. The deposition temperature and thermal annealing effects on the electrical characteristics of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 films on silicon were studied in [5]. The interface/border traps characterization in Al2O3/AlN/GaN structures were derived by dynamic capacitance dispersion technique in [6,7,8]. However, when the Al2O3 based MOS devices are working in aerospace, they would be damaged by the radiation environment in various forms such as the total dosage effect from gamma or X rays, displacement effect induced by heavy ions, and single event upset by high energy particles and so on. The total dosage effect from gamma or X rays significantly affect the operation of MOS devices by giving birth to a certain amount of charges inside the gate dielectric and then causing threshold voltage shift and leakage current increase. When Al2O3 based MOS devices are exposed to gamma or X rays, excessive electron-hole pairs would be generated and move inside Al2O3 and the charges would be trapped both in the dielectric bulk and on the interface between gate dielectric and silicon substrate forming the oxide and interface trapped charge [9,10]. On the other hand, the physical and chemical structures of the Al2O3 based MOS capacitors would also be changed when it is exposed to the radiation environment, including the crystallization characteristic and chemical bonding states change of the dielectric film. The electronic, physical and chemical transformation would degrade the Al2O3 based MOS devices and even result in the device failure. So, it is important to study the radiation response of the Al2O3 based MOS devices under gamma or X rays which would be useful for the radiation hardening of the microelectronic devices working in the space.
The radiation effect of Al2O3 based MOS devices has been studied by many research groups from the aspects of radiation induced charge trapping, trap characteristics and leakage current characteristics and so on. The charge trapping and passivation properties of Al2O3 based stack gate dielectric under gamma-ray irradiation was studied by using Capacitance-Voltage and Deep-Level Transient Spectroscopy measurements in [1,11,12]. The radiation induced defect characteristic as well as the leakage current in Al2O3 based metal-semiconductor-oxide structures under Si heavy ion were studied in [13]. The charge trapping property and charge transportation mechanism in Al2O3 were investigated and the origination of the leakage current and capacitance decrease were also obtained in this work. Except for gamma-ray and Si heavy ions, the radiation hardness of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 gate insulator in GaN-based MIS HEMTs (Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor High-Electron-Mobility Transistor) under proton irradiation was also studied in [14]. However, existing studies mostly focused on the electronic properties including the radiation induced charge trapping and leakage current characteristics, the failure mechanism of Al2O3-based MOS structures under irradiation were rarely studied in terms of physical and chemical characteristics which can provide a deeper understanding of radiation induced charge trapping and leakage current.
The total dose effect of Al2O3 based MOS structure under 60Co gamma-ray is studied in this paper. The Al2O3 thin films were fabricated on the p type silicon by using atomic layer deposition method and the radiation effect of the Al2O3 based MOS structures were studied in terms of electrical, physical and chemical characterization methods. Gamma-rays with the total dose of 1.2 M/2.5 M/4 Mrad(Si) were used as the radiation source. The radiation induced charge trapping characteristic was measured by high frequency capacitance-voltage (CV) method, from which the oxide and interface trapped charge densities in Al2O3/Si structure under different total dose were obtained. The effective trapping efficiency in Al2O3/Si structure was calculated from the threshold voltage shift after radiation. The leakage current characteristic was detected by using current-voltage (IV) measurement testing. The crystallization characteristic of the Al2O3 thin film was measured by using grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) method. The chemical bonding states and the band alignment of Al2O3/Si structure were studied by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) methods. The radiation response of the Al2O3 based MOS structure under gamma ray is summarized from the experimental results.

2. Sample Preparation and Characterization

Many technologies can be used to prepare Al2O3 thin films on silicon substrate, such as chemical vapor deposition method, sputtering, vacuum evaporation and atomic layer deposition methods. However, the ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition) technique has decisive advantage in high-k dielectric film manufacturing compared to the other methods, which can make full use of the surface saturation reaction and provides a high degree of stability. On the other hand, it’s easy to accurately control the dielectric film thickness by using ALD method, which is significant for very thin films with the thickness less than 10 nm.
In this paper, Al2O3 thin films were fabricated by using ALD method on p type silicon with the resistivity of 1–3 Ω·cm−1 and the crystal orientation of <100> by using TMA(Trimethylaluminium) and H2O as the precursor. Firstly, the silicon substrate was put into the reaction chamber after standard RCA (the standard semiconductor cleansing procedure initiated in the ‘RCA laboratory’ in N. J. Princeton) cleansing procedure. Secondly, TMA was then pushed into the reaction chamber by saturated vapor pressure and be adsorbed on the surface of the substrate, and redundant TMA was blow out by N2. Thirdly, H2O was brought into the chamber and reacted with TMA adsorbed on the substrate forming Al2O3, and then the impurities were blow out from the chamber by N2. The films were then annealed by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) at 450 °C for 60 s to strengthen the film cohesion and diminish the number of defects, and these Al2O3/Si structures were prepared for physical and chemical testing. For part of the chips with Al2O3/Si structures, aluminum was evaporated on the surface of Al2O3 films through a hard mask to form dot electrodes, and on the bottom of silicon substrate to form Al/Al2O3/Si structures for electronic measurement. These structures were then annealed by RTA process at 300 °C for 60 s to form ohmic contact between the electrode and the substrate. The thicknesses of the Al2O3 based MOS structures were 14.1 nm and 4.5 nm respectively, which were measured by using ellipsometer after deposition. Every chip with Al2O3/Si or Al/Al2O3/Si structures were divided into four equal parts and each part was irradiated by gamma-ray with different total doses.
60Co gamma-ray was used as the radiation source in this paper, and the total doses used in this article were 1.2 Mrad(Si)/2.5 Mrad(Si)/4 Mrad(Si) respectively with the dose rate of 100 rad(Si)/s, and all the samples were irradiated under gamma-ray with no voltage bias. The electronic, physical and chemical properties of more than eight numbers of Al/Al2O3/Si or Al2O3/Si samples were measured by using CV, IV, GIXRD, XPS and UPS methods before and after each total dose of gamma-ray irradiation. The radiation induced oxide and interface trapped charge density in Al2O3/Si system was calculated from the CV results by using Terman method, and the radiation induced leakage current was derived from IV characteristic. The chemical bonding states of Al2O3/Si system was extracted from XPS measurement and the radiation induced defect characteristic was then obtained. The valance band spectroscopy of Al2O3 was obtained from UPS measurement and the band offsets of Al2O3/Si was analyzed before and after radiation.

3. Experiment and Results

3.1. Crystallization Structure of Al2O3 Film before and after Irradiation

Crystallization characteristic of the gate dielectric film can significantly affect the transistor performance, as the grain boundaries between crystal lattices can act as the charge transport path which would raise the leakage current of the transistors. Considering this, researchers always prefer non-crystallized thin films to be the gate dielectric to ensure lower leakage current, but it is inevitable that the crystallization phases would be generated during post deposition thermal treatment and be changed in many other cases. Radiation rays with high energy might change the crystallization structure of the gate dielectric film, which can be detected by using XRD measurement.
In view of the Al2O3 film thickness in this paper, GIXRD method was used to get the crystallization structure of the Al2O3 thin film on Si substrate with the grazing angle of 0.5° and scanning angle ranging from 15°~80°. The diffraction result is shown in Figure 1, illustrating that the diffraction peaks of the Al2O3 film before and after different total dose of irradiation were located around 55°, and the peak intensities of the irradiated Al2O3 films show no obvious change compared with that before irradiation. On the other hand, we can see that the Al2O3 thin film is mostly in amorphous state as the diffraction peak intensity shown on the spectrum is very low in value.

3.2. Chemical Structure and Band Alignment of Al2O3/Si Structure before and after Irradiation

3.2.1. Chemical Structure of the Al2O3/Si Structure before and after Irradiation

The performance of the Al2O3 based MOS devices can also be affected by the chemical structure including the constituent elements and the chemical bonding states between them, and new defects would be induced inside Al2O3 and on the interface between Al2O3 and Si after gamma-ray irradiation which can be measured by XPS method. The Al2O3-Si interface is the interface between Al2O3 film and the silicon substrate, which is in atomic scale with the value of a few tenths of nanometer. There would be weak Si-O bonds or some dangling bonds, which can introduce interface states to the band gap of Al2O3 on the interface. Ar+ etching was used to investigate the interface structure between 14.1 nm Al2O3 thin film and the silicon substrate for the reason that the penetration depth of X-ray of the equipment is limited to 3~5 nm which is smaller compared to the film thickness. The scanning binding energy in this paper ranged from 0 eV to 1400 eV and the full spectrum is shown in Figure 2. Every element including Al, Si, O has its’ unique binding energy on the XPS spectrum from which we can identify the chemical bonding state between the elements from the core levels on the spectrum. The binding energy peak at 284.8 eV on all the spectrums corresponds to the element carbon which might be introduced during MOS fabricating process or from the air exposure, so this core level of C 1s at 284.8 eV can be used as a reference of calibrate the equipment to eliminate the data deviation owing to the equipment’s charging effect.
We took the detailed XPS spectrum of Al 2p, O 1s, Si 2p to learn more about the chemical structure of Al2O3/Si structure and the results after data calibration by C 1s at 284.8 eV are shown in Figure 3. For the 14.1 nm Al2O3, the core levels of Al 2p, O 1s, and Si 2p taken from Al2O3 film surface are located at 74.9 eV, 531.5 eV, and 98 eV respectively, corresponding to the Al-O bonding and element silicon of the substrate. Moreover, the core levels of the elements show no obvious change with the increase of the radiation total dose implying that the chemical bonding states changed little and no new chemical bonding form was generated after gamma-ray irradiation with the total dose of up to 4 Mrad(Si). For the 4.5 nm Al2O3 film, the spectrum and core levels of Al 2p and O 1s are similar with that of the 14.1 nm Al2O3, and the change of the spectrums are not obvious too. However, the detailed XPS spectrum of Si 2p shows high peak intensity as the X-ray penetration depth is comparable to the film thickness. On the other hand, the Si 2p spectrum shows multi-peaks which are located at 99 eV to 102 eV, corresponding to the Si-O chemical bonding in SiOx. The detailed XPS spectrums of Al 2p, O 1s, Si 2p on Al2O3/Si interface are shown in Figure 4. What is noticeable in Figure 4 is that Al 2p and Si 2p have more than one peak in their detailed scans. This indicates that there is more than one valence state for Al and Si, as every valence state of the chemical elements has its’ unique core level on the XPS spectrum according to the principle of XPS measurement. In order to specify the valence states, multi-peak resolution was applied, and results are shown in the insets of Figure 4. Peak A and peak B correspond to the core levels of each chemical bonding form for the elements. The core levels of each element are located around 75 eV and 73 eV for Al 2p, 532 eV for O 1s, and 98.9 eV and 98.3 eV for Si 2p, implying that there are Al-O bonds, and Al-Si metallic bonds on the interface between Al2O3 and Si substrate.
Semiquantitative method was applied to figure out the atomic concentration ratio of elements by using Equation (1), and the atom ratios between Al and O elements of Al2O3 thin film before and after radiation are shown in Table 1.
n A l n O = I A l 2 p / S A l I O 1 s / S O
where, nAl/nO is the atomic concentration ratio between Al and O, IAl2p and IO1s are the intensity of the binding energy peaks of Al2p and O1s at XPS detailed spectrum in the chemical bonding form of Al2O3, SAl and SO are the sensitive factors of each element with the value of 0.56 and 2.881 determined by the test equipment we used in this paper.
For 14.1 nm Al2O3, the atomic ratio between Al and O inside Al2O3 thin film is around 0.7 which is close to but a little larger than the standard value 0.66. This indicates that the Al2O3 in this paper is basically stoichiometric which is fabricated by ALD method and there are oxygen vacancies inside the Al2O3 film bulk with the amount increase with the increase of radiation total dose. The Al/O atomic ratio on (14.1 nm) Al2O3/Si interface is 0.66 before radiation and gets lower and lower with the increase of the radiation total dose, implying that the interface is also stoichiometric and Al-O bonds were broken after irradiation leaving O dangling bonds and Al-Si metallic bonds on the interface, which is confirmed by the detailed XPS result of Al 2p and Si 2p on the interface. For the 4.5 nm Al2O3, it was found that there are Al-O and Si-O bonds in 4.5 nm Al2O3 film from Figure 3c–e, but it is difficult to differentiate the O 1s peak as the binding energies of Al-O and Si-O are very close to each other. We used the semiquantitative method to roughly estimate the Al/O and ratio as shown in Table 1, and it is found that he Al/O atomic ratio is close to but a little smaller than the stoichiometric value 0.666, which might be resulted from the existence of O 1s from Si-O. The Al/O ratio changes very little after radiation. We also roughly estimated the Si/O atomic ratio from the detailed XPS results by applying the sensitive factor of 0.9 for Si, and they are 0.156, 0.176, 0.186, and 0.209 before and after each total dose of irradiation. Although the calculated Si/O ratio is not accurate as we applied the whole O 1s peak, the relative change of the Si/O ratio after each total dose of irradiation does make sense. It shows that the Si/O ratio increases with the increase of radiation total dose, indicating that oxygen vacancies were generated after irradiation. In summary, gamma-ray irradiation would introduce oxygen vacancies and dangling bonds to the Al2O3/Si structure. The MOS structures would degrade by the raise of the oxide and interface trapped charge density.

3.2.2. Band Alignment of Al2O3/Si Structure under Radiation

The band structure of the Al2O3/Si significantly affect the interface property of the MOS structure as the valence band and conductance band offsets significantly influence the charge transportation characteristic which can be measured by UPS method. The valence band spectrums of Al2O3/Si structures are shown in Figure 5. The valence band offset between Al2O3 and Si substrate on the interface can be figured out by Equation (2).
Δ E v = E V B M A l 2 O 3 E V B M S i
where, ΔEv is the valence band offset between Al2O3 and Si substrate, E V B M A l 2 O 3 is the valence band maximum of Al2O3 film which can be distinguished from the valence band spectrum of Al2O3 by using extrapolation method, and E V B M S i is the valence band maximum of Si substrate.
The valence band maximums before and after 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation figured out by using extrapolation method are 3.96 eV and 3.44 eV for 14.1 nm Al2O3 and are 2.66 eV and 2.6 eV for 4.5 nm Al2O3, respectively. The empirical value of valence band maximum of Si is 0.1 eV with which we can calculate the valence band offset between Al2O3 and Si. From Equation (2), the valence band offsets at Al2O3/Si interface before and after 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation are 3.86 eV and 3.34 eV for 14.1 nm Al2O3, and are 2.56 eV and 2.5 eV for 4.5 nm Al2O3. We can see that the valence band offset at Al2O3/Si interface decreases after irradiation, which is resulted from the newly formed interface traps induced by radiation. From XPS results of Al2O3/Si structure we have known that gamma-ray irradiation would introduce interface traps to the structure which is confirmed by the valence band offset decrease in this part. What’s noticeable is that the valence band offset at Al2O3/Si interface for the 4.5 nm Al2O3 changes very little after 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation, implying that the thinner Al2O3 film would be more radiation resistant compared to the thicker films from the aspect of band alignment, which is in accordance with the XPS results.

3.3. Radiation Induced Charge Trapping and Transportation in Al2O3 Based MOS Structures

The total dose effect of gate dielectric is originated from the generation of large number of electron-holes pairs owing to the ionization induced by gamma-ray irradiation. Part of these electron-hole pairs would first compound with each other and most of the left electrons would be swept out of the dielectric layer, leaving a certain number of radiation induced charges inside the gate dielectric. The charges would be trapped in the MOS structure forming oxide and interface trapped charges and give rise to radiation induced leakage current. The oxide trapped charges are located inside the bulk of Al2O3 film, and the interface trapped charges are located in Al2O3 near the Al2O3/Si interface within the range of a few tenths of nanometer from the silicon substrate. In this part, the radiation induced charge trapping characteristic and the leakage current is studied.
High frequency CV measurement was taken on the Al/Al2O3/Si MOS structure with the scanning voltage ranging from −2 V- + 1 V by the voltage interval of 0.05 V. The accumulation area capacitance in the CV curve is 1.4847 × 10−9 F, from which the relative dielectric constant can be figured out to be 8.368, which is very close to the empirical relative dielectric constant of Al2O3, indicating that the thin gate dielectric film prepared by ALD method has good thermal and electrical performance. The normalized CV curve of 14.1 nm and 4.5 nm Al2O3 film based MOS structures are shown in Figure 6, with the inset showing the CV hysteresis curve.
The CV curves of the MOS structures shift to the negative voltage direction after radiation and the voltage shift increases with the increase of the radiation total dose, indicating that positive oxide trapped charge were generated inside Al2O3 gate dielectric during gamma-ray irradiation. On the other hand, the post-radiation CV curves show stretch-out which demonstrates the generation of interface trapped charge in the MOS structure. The radiation induced oxide and interface trapped charge densities can be figured out by using Terman method and the results are shown in Figure 7, and the results are average value of more than eight samples which have very low CV hysteresis.
For 14.1 nm Al2O3, the oxide trapped charge densities are in the order of 1011–1012 cm−2, which increase with the increase of radiation total dose. The interface trapped charge densities are in the order to 1012 cm−2, which also increase with the increase of radiation total dose. For 4.5 nm Al2O3, the oxide trapped densities are in the order of 1011 cm−2, and the interface trapped charge densities are in the order of 1011 cm−2, and both of them increases with the increase of radiation total dose. Higher radiation total dose results in larger number of electron-hole pairs and larger number of oxide and interface trapped charge, which is confirmed by the results shown in Figure 7. Moreover, the radiation induced oxide trapped charge density in 4.5 nm Al2O3 is much less than that in 14.1 nm Al2O3 under 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation, which might be resulted from the lower number of intrinsic and lower number of radiation induced defects that can act as the trapping centers. It has been proved by the XPS results in 3.2.1, in which the atomic ratio between Al and O of 4.5 nm Al2O3 is closer to 0.66 than that of 14.1 nm Al2O3 implying that the number of oxygen vacancies is smaller in the thinner Al2O3 film. On the other hand, the change of the atomic ratio is lower in 4.5 nm Al2O3 than that in 14.1 nm Al2O3 after 4 Mrad(Si) gamma-ray irradiation. Moreover, the radiation induced interface trapped charge density in 4.5 nm film is one order less than that in 14.1 nm film under each total dose of irradiation, this is in accordance with the Al-O atomic ratio change in the XPS result.
Trapping efficiency is a dimensionless quantity used to approximate the intrinsic “trappiness” of the insulator. The effective trapping efficiency of an alternative dielectric is defined as what the trapping efficiency would be if the gate dielectric were SiO2 instead of an alternative dielectric. This definition is consistent with the concept of EOT, which describes what the thickness of the dielectric would be if it were SiO2 instead of an alternative dielectric, based on the measured capacitance value [15,16]. As for the effective trapping efficiency in the ALD Al2O3 based MOS structure, it can be carried out by using Equation (3).
f o t = Δ V m g ε o x q κ g f y t e q t p h y s D
where, fot is the effective trapping efficiency in Al2O3, ΔVmg is the radiation induced midgag shift, εox is the permittivity of SiO2, q is electronic charge, κg is the electron-hole pair generation per unit dose in Al2O3 which is the known value of charge generation in SiO2(~8.1 × 1012 cm−3·rad−1 in [17]) scaled by the ratio of the bandgap of SiO2 to the bandgap of Al2O3 [15], fy is the charge yield in SiO2 in the same electric field, i it was calculated by the method in [18,19] based on the electric field and the radiation source (~0.5), teq is the equivalent oxide thickness, tpyhs is the physical thickness of Al2O3, D is the radiation total dose.
The effective trapping efficiencies in 14.1 nm Al2O3 are 7.7%, 8.5% and 10.7% under 1.2 Mrad(Si) (approximately 0.69 Mrad(SiO2)), 2.5 Mrad(Si)(approximately 1.45 Mrad(SiO2)) and 4 Mrad(Si)(approximately 2.32 Mrad(SiO2)), respectively. The effective trapping efficiencies in 4.5 nm Al2O3 are 19.6%, 13.4% and 10.2% under 1.2 Mrad(Si), 2.5 Mrad(Si) and 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation, respectively. The trapping efficiencies in ALD Al2O3 in this paper are lower compared with the effective trapping efficiency in SiO2 reported in [15] ranging from a few percent up to 50%, which is dependent primarily on the number of oxygen vacancies in the oxide. This result shows that the radiation induced charge trapping in ALD-Al2O3 is not critical as that in as-deposited SiO2, but it is still larger than that in radiation hardened SiO2 in [15]. So, the radiation hardness of ALD Al2O3 based MOS devices still needs further research before it is used in space environment.
The leakage current through the Al2O3 based MOS structure is very important parameter reflecting the device performance, and the leakage current characteristic of the MOS structures were measured by using Keithley 4200 SCS with the scanning voltage ranging from −2 V- + 3 V by the voltage interval of 0.05 V. The leakage current is around 3 × 10−7 A at + 1 V which changes very little after irradiation, indicating that the radiation induced leakage current is not the key factor of the damage effect of the Al2O3 based MOS structures.

4. Discussion

The radiation damage effect of Al2O3 based MOS structures is studied in this paper from the aspects of electronic, physical and chemical properties. From the physical structure results measured by GIXRD method, we have found that the diffraction peak of the Al2O3 film located at around 55°on the diffraction spectrum and the diffraction peaks are not so sharp with relatively low peak intensity, indicating that the Al2O3 film is dominated by amorphous states. The deposition temperature and post-annealing temperature was not high enough to form perfect crystallization phases which depends strongly on the thermal treatment process. On the other hand, Al2O3 films grown directly on Si was reported to remain amorphous up to 1000 °C [4]. These are the reasons of the amorphous state of the ALD Al2O3 dielectric film that can produce excellent electrical characteristics. Moreover, the peak location as well as the peak intensity change little after irradiation, implying that the amorphous dominated Al2O3 film is radiation resistant as the crystallization changes little after radiation. Furthermore, research has reported that doping HfO2 by Al raises the film crystallization temperature of HfO2 and thus drastically reduces the oxygen diffusion along the grain boundaries during annealing in [4,20]. In this paper, the leakage current through Al2O3 also changes little after irradiation, which is in accordance with the crystallization characteristic as the grain boundaries are always thought to be charge transport channels. The impact of gamma radiation on charge trapping properties of nanolaminated HfO2/Al2O3 ALD stacks was studied in [12], and no leakage deterioration was detected for the investigated stacks and doses which supports the result in this paper.
The radiation induced damage is dominated by the newly formed defects and the charge trapping [21]. From the XPS results, we can use ALD method to fabricate a stoichiometric Al2O3 film with low density of intrinsic defect both inside the oxide and on Al2O3/Si interface. We have found that oxygen vacancy is dominant oxide defects inside Al2O3 film, which increase with the increase of irradiation total dose. The Al2O3/Si interface defects are dominated by O dangling bonds and Al-Si metallic bonds, which also increases with the increase of irradiation total dose. The Al-O bonds would have been broken under the high energy of gamma-ray irradiation, leaving new oxygen vacancies inside Al2O3 film and leaving dangling bonds and Al-Si metallic bonds at Al2O3/Si interface, which would act as the trapping centers in the MOS structures. Moreover, weak Si-O bonds were found in the thinner film, indicating that there might be oxygen penetration in Al2O3 film. Oxygen would penetrate to the Al2O3/Si interface and react with silicon substrate, forming weak Si-O bonds. These weak Si-O bonds would also participate in the irradiation damage effect of the film. Metallic bonds on the gate dielectric/substrate interface would be induced from the combine of Al and Si on the interface resulting from the oxygen diffusion to Si substrate [22]. On the other hand, researchers have proposed that H+ transportation plays an important role in the radiation induced interface defect formation between gate dielectric and silicon substrate, the passivated Si dangling bonds by H would be broken after radiation and form Si dangling bonds [23,24], and this might facilitate the formation of Al-Si metallic bonds on the interface. The interface defects would also affect the band offsets between Al2O3 and Si substrate, which is confirmed by the UPS results that the valence band offset decreases after 4 Mrad(Si) irradiation.
According to the total dosage effect theory, radiation would give rise to large number of electron-hole pairs which would be trapped and move inside the MOS structure after initial compound. The trapped charge density in Al2O3 based MOS structures is dependent not only on the charge yield but also on the effective trapping efficiency and the new trap generation after radiation. The effective trapping efficiencies are in the range of 7% to 20% in the 14.1 nm and 4.5 nm Al2O3 film, which are lower compared with that in as- deposited SiO2 but still larger than that in radiation hardened SiO2 [15]. The oxide trapped charge in Al2O3 is positive which increases with the increase of irradiation total dose, and the interface trapped charge at Al2O3/Si interface is also positive and also increase with the total dose. The oxide and interface trapped charge density are in the order of 1011 cm−2–1012 cm−2 in 14.1 nm Al2O3 based MOS structure and are in the order of 1011 cm−2 in 4.5 nm Al2O3 based MOS structure, this result supports [5,11]. As the effective trapping efficiency is similar, the lower radiation induced trapped charge density in thinner Al2O3 film might be resulted from the lower defect density as shown in the XPS results. Moreover, as the interface characteristic between Al2O3 gate dielectric and the substrate would influence the performance of the MOS structure, we can introduce an interface layer to the MOS structure. It was reported that the interface characterization was improved after adding an AlN interface between Al2O3 and the substrate in [6].
In summary, the radiation damage in Al2O3 based MOS structure is dominated by charge trapping and trap generation, and the radiation hardness of Al2O3 film needs further research before it is used in space environment.

5. Conclusions

The radiation response of ALD Al2O3 based MOS structures were studied in this article, and we can conclude the radiation response as following:
(1)
The radiation induced oxide and interface trapped charges are positive in the order of 1011 cm−2–1012 cm−2 in 14.1 nm Al2O3 and 1011 cm−2 in 4.5 nm Al2O3, which increase with the radiation total dose.
(2)
The radiation induced defects are oxygen vacancies in Al2O3 bulk and O dangling bonds and Al-Si metallic bonds on Al2O3/Si interface, which increase with the increase of total dose. The effective trapping efficiencies in Al2O3 film are in the range of 7% to 20% under each total dose of gamma-ray irradiation.
(3)
The physical structure of Al2O3 shows no obvious change after radiation, and the leakage current through Al2O3 film also changes little after radiation which is in accordance with the physical characteristic.
In summary, ALD method is a favorable fabricating method for high-k gate dielectrics as the Al2O3 film is basically stoichiometric and the film is almost amorphous. The radiation induced charge trapping and radiation induced defect generation are responsible for the damage effect of Al2O3 based MOS structures. The radiation induced trapped charge densities are not very large, but the radiation induced defects would prevent the use of Al2O3 based MOS devices in space environment. Considering this, the ALD Al2O3 should be radiation hardened, such as introducing a SiO2 layer to form stacked gate dielectric layer to improve the electrical and chemical characteristic on the interface or doping some other elements to restraint the defect generation. All in all, the ALD Al2O3 film is radiation resistant to some extent which makes it a promising candidate of new high-k gate dielectrics for MOS devices working in space. Before that, the radiation hardness of Al2O3 based MOS devices needs further research.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51507049), China postdoctoral science foundation (No. 2020M683705XB).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reason.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lok, R.; Kaya, S.; Yilmaz, E. Thermal phase separation of ZrSiO4 thin films and frequency-dependent electrical characteristics of the Al/ZrSiO4/p-Si/Al MOS capacitors. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2018, 33, 055007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cao, S.; Ke, X.; Ming, S. Study of γ-ray radiation influence on SiO2/HfO2/Al2O3/HfO2/Al2O3 memory capacitor by C-V and DLTS. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 11079–11085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, W.; Ma, T.; Tamagawa, T.; Gibson, M.; Furukawa, T. Effect of Al inclusion in HfO2 on the physical and electrical properties of the dielectrics. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2002, 23, 649–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, H.Y.; Wu, N.; Li, M.F.; Zhu, C.; Cho, B.J.; Kwong, D.L.; Tung, C.H.; Pan, J.S.; Chai, J.W.; Wang, W.D.; et al. Thermal stability of (HfO2)(x)(Al2O3)(1-x) on Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3618–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rafí, J.M.; Zabala, M.; Beldarrain, O.; Campabadal, F. Deposition Temperature and Thermal Annealing Effects on the Electrical Characteristics of Atomic Layer Deposited Al2O3 Films on Silicon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, G108–G114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, S.; Yang, S.; Tang, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, C.; Wang, M.; Shen, B.; Chen, K.J. Interface/border trap characterization of Al2O3/AlN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor structures with an AlN interfacial layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 051605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hori, Y.; Yatabe, Z.; Hashizume, T. Characterization of interface states in Al2O3/AlGaN/GaN structures for improved performance of high-electron-mobility transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 244503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ma, X.H.; Zhu, J.J.; Liao, X.Y.; Yue, T.; Chen, W.W.; Hao, Y. Quantitative characterization of interface traps in Al2O3/AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor high-electron-mobility transistors by dynamic capacitance dispersion technique. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 033510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petzold, S.; Sharath, S.U.; Lemke, J.; Hildebrandt, E.; Trautmann, C.; Alff, L. Heavy Ion Radiation Effects on Hafnium Oxide-Based Resistive Random Access Memory. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2019, 66, 1715–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ogawa, K.; Nishitani, T.; Isobe, M.; Sato, M.; Yokota, M.; Hayashi, H.; Kobuchi, T.; Nishimura, T. Effects of gamma-ray irradiation on electronic and non-electronic equipment of Large Helical Device. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2017, 19, 25601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, Z.; Dong, P.; Xie, M.; Li, Y.; Yu, X.; Ma, Y. Study of gamma-ray radiation effects on the passivation properties of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 on silicon using deep-level transient spectroscopy. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 30, 1148–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Spassov, D.; Paskaleva, A.; Davidović, V.; Djorić-Veljković, S.; Stanković, S.; Stojadinović, N.; Ivanov, T.; Stanchev, T. Impact of gamma Radiation on Charge Trapping Properties of Nanolaminated HfO2/Al2O3 ALD Stacks. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Microelectronics, Nis, Serbia, 16–18 September 2019; pp. 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Z.S.; Zhu, H.P.; Li, B.; Gao, J.T.; Li, D.L.; Luo, J.J.; Han, Z.S.; et al. Studies of radiation effects in Al2O3-based metal-oxide-semiconductor structures induced by Si heavy ions. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 115701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, S.J.; Cho, K.J.; Jung, H.W.; Kim, J.J.; Jang, Y.J.; Bae, S.B.; Kim, D.S.; Bae, Y.; Yoon, H.S.; Ahn, H.K.; et al. Improvement of Proton Radiation Hardness Using ALD-Deposited Al2O3 Gate Insulator in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, Q245–Q248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Felix, J.; Fleetwood, D.; Schrimpf, R.; Hong, J.; Lucovsky, G.; Schwank, J.; Shaneyfelt, M. Total-dose radiation response of hafnium-silicate capacitors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2002, 49, 3191–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Felix, J.A.; Schwank, J.R.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Shaneyfelt, M.R.; Gusev, E.P. Effects of radiation and charge trapping on the reliability of high-kappa gate dielectrics. Microelectron. Reliab. 2004, 44, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benedetto, J.M.; Boesch, H.E. The Relationship between 60Co and 10-keV X-Ray Damage in MOS Devices. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1986, 33, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sambuco Salomone, L.; Faigon, A.; Redin, E.G. Numerical Modeling of MOS dosimeters under switched bias irradiations. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2015, 62, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dozier, C.M.; Fleetwood, D.M.; Brown, D.B.; Winokur, P.S. An evaluation of low-energy X-ray and cobalt-60 irradiations of MOS transistors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1987, 34, 1535–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, H.Y.; Li, M.F.; Cho, B.J.; Yeo, C.C.; Joo, M.S.; Kwong, D.-L.; Pan, J.S.; Ang, C.H.; Zheng, J.Z.; Ramanathan, S. Energy gap and band alignment for (HfO2)x(Al2O3)1−x on (100) Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 376–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ding, M.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, X. Total dose response of hafnium oxide based metal-oxide- semiconductor structure under gamma-ray irradiation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 1792–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hakala, M.H.; Foster, A.S.; Gavartin, J.L.; Havu, P.; Puska, M.J.; Nieminen, R.M. Interfacial oxide growth at silicon/high-k oxide interfaces: First principles modeling of the Si-HfO2 interface. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 043708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fleetwood, D. Effects of hydrogen transport and reactions on microelectronics radiation response and reliability. Microelectron. Reliab. 2002, 42, 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ding, M. The radiation response of hafnium oxide based metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors under 60Co gamma ray. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) result of the Al2O3 thin film.
Figure 1. The grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) result of the Al2O3 thin film.
Micromachines 12 00661 g001
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Full spectrum taken on the surface of Al2O3 thin film.
Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Full spectrum taken on the surface of Al2O3 thin film.
Micromachines 12 00661 g002
Figure 3. Detailed XPS results taken on the surface of Al2O3 film.
Figure 3. Detailed XPS results taken on the surface of Al2O3 film.
Micromachines 12 00661 g003
Figure 4. Detailed XPS results taken on Al2O3/Si interface.
Figure 4. Detailed XPS results taken on Al2O3/Si interface.
Micromachines 12 00661 g004
Figure 5. Valence band spectrum of Al2O3/Si structure taken by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS).
Figure 5. Valence band spectrum of Al2O3/Si structure taken by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS).
Micromachines 12 00661 g005
Figure 6. CV characteristic of the 14.1 nm Al2O3 based MOS structures before and after irradiation.
Figure 6. CV characteristic of the 14.1 nm Al2O3 based MOS structures before and after irradiation.
Micromachines 12 00661 g006
Figure 7. Oxide and interface trapped charge density in Al2O3 based MOS structures.
Figure 7. Oxide and interface trapped charge density in Al2O3 based MOS structures.
Micromachines 12 00661 g007
Table 1. Atomic concentration ratio between Al and O in the Al2O3/Si structure.
Table 1. Atomic concentration ratio between Al and O in the Al2O3/Si structure.
Total Dose14.1 nm Al2O3 (Surface)14.1 nm Al2O3 (Interface)4.5 nm Al2O3
Pre-0.7180.660.656
1.2Mrad0.7250.610.657
2.5Mrad0.7390.610.661
4Mrad0.7540.560.661
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, M. Damage Effect of ALD-Al2O3 Based Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures under Gamma-Ray Irradiation. Micromachines 2021, 12, 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12060661

AMA Style

Ding M. Damage Effect of ALD-Al2O3 Based Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures under Gamma-Ray Irradiation. Micromachines. 2021; 12(6):661. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12060661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Man. 2021. "Damage Effect of ALD-Al2O3 Based Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures under Gamma-Ray Irradiation" Micromachines 12, no. 6: 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12060661

APA Style

Ding, M. (2021). Damage Effect of ALD-Al2O3 Based Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures under Gamma-Ray Irradiation. Micromachines, 12(6), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12060661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop