High Quality-Factor and Spectrum-Clean AlN Lamb-Wave Resonators with Optimized Lateral Reflection Boundary Conditions and Transducer Design

Abstract

This paper presents a high quality-factor (Q) and spectrum-clean AlN Lamb-wave resonator (LWR). The width of its lateral reflection boundary was optimized to weaken the transverse modes’ coupling and wave guiding, and then to improve the LWR’s Q value and spectral purity, which was verified by finite element analysis and experimental characterization. In addition, the series resonance quality factor (Q_s) value of the interdigitated (IDT)-Ground LWR is similar to that of the IDT-Floating LWR, but its parallel resonance quality factor (Q_p) is nearly doubled, due to the reduction of the electrical loss induced by its static capacitance (C₀). The measured results show that the designed LWR with optimized boundary reflection conditions and IDT-Ground structure exhibit Q_s and Q_p values as high as 4019.8 and 839.5 at 401.2 MHz and 402.9 MHz, respectively, meanwhile, it has good spectral purity. Moreover, the influence of the metal ratio and material of the LWR’s IDT electrodes on the device’s performance was also studied by theoretical analysis and experimental verification.

1. Introduction

Benefiting from the development of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) technology and the advanced micro-fabrication process, the MEMS acoustic resonators have been widely used in communication and sensing systems, such as oscillators, filters, and sensors, due to their small size, low power consumption, high performance, and so on [1,2,3]. At present, commercial MEMS acoustic resonators mainly include surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, solidly mounted resonators (SMRs) and film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) [4,5,6]. SAW resonators have a simple and low-cost manufacturing process and can realize multi-band integration on a single chip. However, SAW resonators can hardly achieve high quality-factor (Q) value and large power capacity, and their frequencies are difficult to exceed 3 GHz due to the low phase velocity and lithography limit [7]. SMRs and FBARs have the advantages of high frequency, high Q value, and large power capacity, but it is impossible to achieve multi-band on a single-chip due to the thickness of the piezoelectric film determining their resonant frequencies [8]. Recently, AlN Lamb-wave resonators (LWRs) have attracted more and more attention, taking the advantages of both SAW resonators, SMRs, and FBARs: the lithographically defined frequency, high performance, multi-band integration, complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) compatible fabrication process, and so on [9,10].

For LWRs, their lowest order symmetric (S0) mode is respected for its high phase velocity and weak velocity dispersion [11]. However, some spurious modes existing in the vicinity of the S0 main mode will inevitably deteriorate the LWRs’ performance [12]. The strong transverse spurious modes across the lateral direction may reduce the accuracy and stability for oscillators and sensors, and induced in-band ripples may seriously affect the performance of filters [13]. Until now, there have been two main methods to suppress the transverse spurious modes. One type of method involves changing the edge shapes or the anchors of the resonators to effectively distribute and scatter the transverse acoustic wave [14,15,16]. Another type of method involves applying electrode apodization or dummy electrodes to suppress the transverse modes [17,18]. However, the change of the transducer length caused by the apodization or dummy electrodes may cause the additional loss and reduction of the electromechanical coupling coefficient (k²_eff).

Furthermore, high Q values are highly required for LWRs to achieve the low insertion-loss filters, low phase-noise oscillators, and high-resolution sensors [19,20]. In the past, the researchers of the piezo-MEMS resonators’ Q values mainly focused on the series resonance quality factor (Q_s), instead of the parallel-resonance quality factor (Q_p) [21]. The Q_s is mainly determined by the motional resistance (R_m) and the routing resistance (R_s), which represents the acoustic-wave loss and the electrical loss. The Q_s is usually larger than Q_p, because the R_s affected by metal wiring is much smaller. Instead, Q_p is determined by the R_m and the static resistance (R₀), represents the electric loss and other acoustic loss around the parallel resonant frequency (f_p), which can precisely indicate the level of acoustic loss [9].

In this paper, the generation mechanism of the transverse modes in LWRs was theoretically analyzed, and the effective technique to suppress the transverse mode was also proposed. The influence of the boundary reflection structure on the AlN LWRs’ performance was studied. The displacement-field distributions and the admittance responses under different reflection boundary conditions were simulated by using finite element analysis (FEA), and the reflection boundary structure was optimized to change the acoustic reflection conditions so as to suppress the spurious mode. In addition, the LWRs with different electrode structures were analyzed by using FEA simulation and experimental characterization. The amplitudes of transverse spurious modes in the experimental results are consistent with the theoretical prediction and the FEA simulation. Based on the measured frequency responses, the Modified Butterworth—van Dyke (MBVD) equivalent circuit model was constructed to analyze the influence of the change of static capacitance on Q_p under different electrode structures.

2. Design and Micro-Fabrication

As shown in Figure 1a, the designed AlN Lamb-wave resonator in this work comprises of a 1μm-thick AlN film sandwiched between two patterned metal layers that are used to actuate Lamb-wave modes in the AlN film. The suspended flat edge and bottom cavity are employed as the Lamb-wave reflectors, and the full support structure is used to support the device above the cavity. Figure 1b shows the cross-sectional view of the resonator, and the main geometrical parameters are illustrated in

Table 1. The main geometric dimensions of the designed AlN LWRs.

Top IDT period (p)	12 μm	IDT width (We)	8.5 μm
IDT numbers (n)	6	Effective electrode length (Le)	192 μm
Bottom electrode width (WMo)	72 μm	Finger-to-bus gap (g)	6 μm
AlN plate width (WAlN)	96 μm	Bus width (Wbus)	7 μm

, mainly including interdigitated (IDT) period (p), IDT number (n), bottom electrode width (W_Mo), effective electrode length (L_e), bus width (W_bus), and finger-to-bus gap (g). The top IDT electrodes are patterned by a 200 nm-thick Al layer, connected to alternate between the ground and RF signals, and the bottom electrodes are patterned by a 200 nm-thick Mo layer. The top IDT electrodes and bottom electrodes are combined to actuate the S0 mode in the AlN film and the frequency of LWRs is mainly dependent on the p of IDTs, which can be expressed in Equation (1) [22]. For LWRs, the IDTs’ central regions located at the potential maximums and displacement-amplitude minimums can contribute to achieving ideal harmonic conditions. In this work, three LWRs with different extended lateral reflection boundary widths (d) of 3 μm, 6 μm, and 12 μm were designed. The design can avoid the exposure of the Mo electrode at the reflection boundary due to lithography deviations, which may induce the undesired etching of the Mo electrode during XeF₂ releasing. The suitable extended width can ensure the Lamb-wave reflected in the region of maximum displacement, which can maintain excellent spectral purity and high Q value.

$$f=\frac{v}{\lambda }=\frac{v}{2p}$$

(1)

where v is the phase velocity of the LWR, and λ is the wavelength as shown in Figure 1b.

Based on the LWRs’ structural characteristics, the S0 mode can be effectively excited, which has the advantages of high phase velocity, weak phase velocity dispersion, high Q value, and medium k²_eff. However, the S0 mode may coincide with some transverse spurious modes, which will deteriorate the LWRs’ spectral purity. In order to study the transverse spurious modes, the displacement-field distributions of the LWR with the 3-μm-width reflection boundary were derived by using COMSOL Multiphysics V5.5a software. Figure 2a shows the vibration mode at 363.1 MHz, and Figure 2b shows its displacement curve of the mass point along the x-axis excluding the extended regions. In Figure 2b, there exist six static-displacement points corresponding to the blue areas under the IDT electrodes. If the vibration mode exists, with the number of static displacement points equaling to n, it can be called nth-S0 resonance [23]. Figure 2c,d show the vibration mode and displacement curve at 474.6 MHz, respectively, and the mode can be defined as 8th-S0 resonance. It can be seen from Figure 2b,d that the vibration amplitude of 8th-S0 resonance is smaller than that of 6th-S0 resonance. Therefore, the mode of 8th-S0 resonance is a spurious mode far away from the of S0 main mode. The approximate vibration amplitude u(x) of nth-S0 mode along the transverse width can be expressed by Equation (2) [24]:

$$u\left(x\right)=\frac{{\omega }_n}{2}(cos\frac{2\pi }{W_{AlN}-2d}nx+1)$$

(2)

where ω_n is the vibration amplitude of the resonator’s endpoints at nth-S0 resonance; x is coordinate value along the width direction; n is the number of static displacement points.

The reason for the generation of spurious modes (such as the 8th-S0 mode) is that the incident Lamb wave is reflected on the edge reflector, and the amplitude and phase of the reflected wave are deviated from the incident wave, which causes long interference between them. The amplitude and phase deviation are related to the width of the reflection boundary. In other words, choosing an appropriate boundary width can suppress spurious modes near the main mode. The extended lateral boundary reflection widths d were set as 3 μm, 6 μm, and 12 μm for different LWRs. By extending lateral reflection boundaries, the acoustic boundaries of the LWRs are modified, and the 6th-S0 and 8th-S0 resonances may be excited together.

The COMSOL software was used to calculate the influence of the lateral reflection boundary width on the LWRs’ frequency-response characteristics. As shown in Figure 3a, the 6th-S0 resonant frequency of the LWRs with d = 3 μm, 6 μm and 12 μm are 363.1 MHz, 337.9 MHz, and 394.8 MHz, respectively. For the LWR with d = 6 μm, the admittance peak-to-peak value of the 8th-S0 resonance reaches up to 33.6 dB, which deteriorates the Q value and spectral purity of the 6th-S0 main mode. Fortunately, the 8th-S0 mode can be effectively converted into other Lamb waves by adjusting the width of the lateral reflection boundary. Especially for the LWR with d = 12 μm, the 8th-S0 resonance almost disappeared. In order to further analyze the phenomenon, the displacement-field distributions were also extracted in Figure 3b. In the case of d = 6 μm, the displacement of the 8th transverse spurious mode is relatively large, and the strong coupling of the spurious mode has caused serious damage to the 6th main mode. As the boundary extension is 3 μm and 12 μm, the displacement amplitude of the 8th spurious mode is significantly reduced. Moreover, the static displacement points of the LWR with d = 12 μm are evenly distributed in the middle of each IDT, which can minimize the interface loss caused by the electrode and the loss caused by the acoustic impedance matching between materials. For the LWR with d = 12 μm, the 8th-S0 mode is transformed into the 7th-S0 mode and overtone mode affected by the longitudinal mode, and the 8th-S0 mode almost disappears completely. The k²_eff of the LWRs with d = 3 μm, 6 μm and 12 μm are 1.2%, 0.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The slight difference is because the change of the width of the reflection boundary will also have a certain influence on the amplitude and phase of the main mode, and then cause the change of k²_eff. Moreover, the spurious signal causes a certain attenuation to the k²_eff of the main mode. The spurious mode of the LWR with d = 6 μm is the most obvious, so the k²_eff is the lowest. Compared with the LWR of d = 6 μm, although the LWR of d = 12 μm can effectively suppress the 8th-S0 mode, the 7th-S0 mode and overtone mode converted from the 8th-S0 mode also slightly affect the k²_eff of the main mode.

In order to explore the impact of the IDT structure on device performance, the LWRs with IDT-floating and IDT-Ground structures were analyzed in the case of d = 12 μm. As shown in Figure 4a, the IDT-Floating electrode structure offers a larger k²_eff than IDT-Ground because the floating potential offers smaller static capacitance. The electric loss is reduced due to the reduction in static resistance, which means that the IDT-Ground LWR exhibit a higher Q_p value. And the Q_p value is a good indicator of the actual acoustic loss level. Besides, the LWRs with IDT widths W_e of 7.5 μm and 10 μm were also designed to study the effect of W_e on the LWRs’ performance, and the simulated admittance curves are shown in Figure 4b.

Affected by the mass-loading effect, the resonant frequency of the LWR decreases with the increase of W_e. Compared to the above-mentioned LWR with W_e = 8.5 μm, the LWR with W_e = 7.5 μm exhibit higher resonant frequency, and the resonant frequency of the LWR with W_e = 10 μm are decreased. In addition, their Q values are both attenuated to a certain extent. A model of the loss mechanism is used to investigate the causes affecting the Q decay of the resonator, as shown in Equation (3) [25]:

$$\frac{1}{Q}=\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{electric}}}+\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{acoustic}}}+\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{TED}}}+\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{material}}}+\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{interface}}}+\frac{1}{Q_{\mathit{other}}}$$

(3)

including electric loss (Q_electric), acoustic loss (Q_acoustic), thermoplastic damping (TED) loss (Q_TED), intrinsic material limitations (Q_material), interface loss (Q_interface), and other loss such as anchor loss and phonon-phonon interaction loss. With the increases of the electrode width, the interface loss between the piezoelectric and electrode layers increases, resulting in a decrease in the Q_interface value, which in turn causes the Q value of the resonator with W_e = 10 μm to be lower than that of the resonator with W_e = 8.5 μm. In the case of W_e = 7.5 μm, its Q value is also decreased due to the decrease of Q_electric caused by the increase of electric loss. By contrast, the LWR with W_e = 8.5 μm can obtain better frequency-response characteristic.

The designed LWRs were fabricated on a 6-inch silicon wafer based on seven-step lithography. The fabrication process starts with cavity etching, thermal oxidation, polysilicon deposition, etching and polishing, which forms a release barrier that can prevent the excessive etching during XeF₂ releasing. The detailed process flow is similar to that described in [26]. The fabricated 6-inch wafer is shown in Figure 5a, and the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a fabricated LWR is shown in Figure 5b. Figure 5c shows the cross-sectional view of the composite AlN-seed/Mo/AlN layers. It is clearly seen that the bottom Mo electrodes have a shear angle of 33.58°, which can contribute to a relatively flat surface and no crack for the AlN structural layer. In Figure 5d, the measured X-ray diffraction (XRD) rocking curve of the 1-μm-thick AlN (002) layer has a full width at half maximum (FWHM) value of 1.39°, which indicates that the AlN layer has an excellent crystalline quality.

3. Measurement and Discussion

The transmission characteristics of the fabricated resonators were measured by a Keysight N5244A vector network analyzer (VNA) and a Cascade SA8 probe station at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, as shown in Figure 6a. The signal power of the VNA was set as 0 dBm (1 mW), and a standard short-load-open-through (SLOT) calibration was performed before testing. The designed devices in this work were all one-port devices, so their frequency responses obtained by the VNA are the reflection scattering parameters S₁₁, as shown in Figure 6b.

The frequency response of admittance Y₁₁ can be extracted from the measured S₁₁ by using Equation (4):

$$Y_{11}\left(\mathit{dB}\right)=20\mathit{lg}|Y_{11}|=20\mathit{lg}|\frac{1}{Z_0}\frac{1-S_{11}}{1+S_{11}}|$$

(4)

where the Z₀ = 50 Ω represents the characteristic impedance, which is the source or load impedance of the VNA.

The admittance curves of the fabricated resonators under different reflection boundary conditions with d = 3 μm, 6 μm, and 12 μm were extracted according to the measured S₁₁, as shown in Figure 7. For the LWRs with d = 3 μm and 6 μm, the measured results show that their 6th-S0 resonances occur at 374.8 MHz and 349.5 MHz, respectively, and 8th-S0 resonances occur at 427.7 MHz and 449.3 MHz. The measured resonant frequencies are in good agreement with the calculated values, and the small deviation may be induced by the biases of the geometric dimensions and material parameters between the simulation and fabrication. In accord with the simulation results of Figure 3, in the two LWRs with d = 3 μm and 6 μm exist obvious 8th spurious resonances, especially for the LWR with d = 6 μm. Due to the good guided waves and limited L_e, the strong coupling of the 8th spurious mode causes an adverse impact on the main mode. By adjusting the reflection boundary width, the transverse propagation path can be changed to weaken the coupling and the wave guiding of the 8th transverse mode. For the LWR with d = 12 μm, the spurious mode was effectively converted and dissipated, splitting into multiple longitudinal modes, which is consistent with the simulation results above.

The Q_s values and k²_eff are important parameters for the LWRs, and both of them were extracted based on the measured results by using Equations (5) and (6) [22]. The Q_s value and the k²_eff of the LWR with d = 12 μm were up to 4019.8 and 0.6%, respectively. For the LWRs with d = 3 μm and 6 μm, however, the Q_s values decreased to 3726 and 2870, and the k²_eff were 0.84% and 0.59% with no significant variation. The k²_eff of the LWR with d = 12 μm was slightly lower than that of the other two LWRs. On the one hand, the widening of the reflection boundary suppresses the spurious modes and also suppresses the main mode to a certain extent. On the other hand, the 8th-S0 mode is transformed into other smaller spurious modes affected by the longitudinal mode, which will cause a decrease in the k²_eff of the main mode. As d = 12 μm, the 8th transverse spurious mode is effectively suppressed due to its ideal harmonic condition, which helps to obtain the pure spectrum. Moreover, the static displacement points are evenly distributed in the middle of the IDTs, which minimizes the interface loss and acoustic loss. Therefore, the designed LWR with d = 12 μm can achieve the highest Q values, which is consistent well with the above simulation results.

$$Q_s=\frac{f_s}{\Delta f_{3dB}}$$

(5)

$$k_{eff}^2=\frac{{\pi }^2}{4}\frac{(f_p-f_s)}{f_p}$$

(6)

The frequency response of the IDT-Floating resonator with the 12-μm-width reflection boundary was also measured, as shown in Figure 8a. The measured results show its f_s = 401.2 MHz, f_p = 402.8 MHz, and Q_s = 4457.8 are similar as the IDT-Ground resonator with d = 12 μm, and its k²_eff increases from 0.6% to 0.94% due to smaller static-capacitance value. However, its Q_p value significantly drops from 839.5 to 324.8. To further analyze the cause of the Q_p decrease in the IDT-Floating structure, the MBVD model was constructed to fit the measured admittance curves and extract the equivalent circuit parameters, as shown in Figure 8b. The equivalent circuit is composed of a mechanical resonance branch, which includes a motional inductance (L_m), a motional capacitor (C_m), and a motional resistance (R_m) in series, corresponding to the mass, stiffness, and damping of the mechanical system, respectively.

Based on the MBVD model, the extracted equivalent circuit parameters of the LWRs with IDT-Ground and IDT-Floating structures are listed in

Table 2. The extracted equivalent circuit parameters for the designed LWRs.

Transducer Configurations	IDTs Material	We (μm)	R0 (Ω)	C0 (fF)	Rm (Ω)	Cm (fF)	Lm (μH)	Rs (Ω)
IDT-Ground	Al	8.5	120.21	663.15	29.91	3.03	51.66	7.33
IDT-Floating	Al	8.5	311.14	188.08	25.31	3.03	192.41	11.25
IDT-Ground	Al	7.5	105.05	595.51	41.48	3.19	48.95	23.65
IDT-Ground	Al	10	74.05	715.95	64.06	3.55	45.08	5.47
IDT-Floating	Au	8.5	378.0	374.31	210.6	2.77	69.82	2.39
IDT-Ground	Au	8.5	106.04	624.21	198.93	3.11	62.12	1.25

. The R_s on the main circuit corresponds to the Ohmic loss of the electrode. C₀ on the other branch is the static capacitance, representing the electrostatic coupling between electrodes, and R₀ represents the electrical losses and other acoustic losses in the piezoelectric film [27]. Compared with the IDT-Floating structure, the LWR with the IDT-Ground structure can provide a larger cross-field capacitance due to its unidirectional vertical electric field, which greatly makes the C₀ larger. The increase of C₀ can effectively reduce the dielectric loss and thus reduce R₀. It can be seen from Equation (7) that the smaller R₀ is the cause of the increase of Q_p in the IDT-Ground structure [28].

$$Q_p=\frac{1}{{\omega }_p(R_m+R_0)C_m}$$

(7)

where ω_p is the angular resonant frequency (ω_p = 2πf_p).

In addition, under the same boundary reflection conditions, the W_e has a certain impact on the performance of the LWRs. In the case that the reflection boundary was extended for one IDT period with IDT-Ground structure, the LWRs with W_e = 7.5 μm and 10 μm were also measured, as shown in Figure 9. The measured f_s for W_e = 7.5 μm and 10 μm were 402.4 MHz and 397.7 MHz, respectively, which are similar to that of the LWR with W_e = 8.5 μm, and the small deviation is mainly caused by the mass-loading effect. However, the Q_s values of the two LWRs were seriously decreased to 1677.1 and 1729.1, respectively. The relationship between the device’s Q_s value and various losses can be expressed as Equation (3). The extracted equivalent circuit parameters of the LWRs with different W_e are also listed in Table 2. As W_e = 10 μm, the R_m value is increased and then reduces the Q_s value, which is mainly due to the intensification of acoustic loss, intrinsic material loss, and interface loss. For the LWR with W_e = 7.5 μm, its Q_s value is also reduced. With the decrease of W_e, the C₀ value is reduced which leads to a larger dielectric loss, so that the R_m is increased can be seen in Equation (8) [29]. In summary, the LWR with appropriate W_e = 8.5 μm can contribute to achieving the maximum Q_s value, which is consistent with the above simulation results.

$$R_m\propto \frac{1}{C_0{k}_{eff}^2{Q}_s}$$

(8)

Furthermore, the LWRs with the Au IDTs have also been fabricated to study the impact of different IDT electrodes materials on the LWRs’ performance. Figure 10 shows the measured and fitted admittance curves of the LWRs with IDT-Ground and IDT-Floating structures, and the parameters of the MBVD fittings for these two cases are listed in Table 2. Compared with the LWRs with Al IDTs, the f_s of LWRs with the Au IDTs reduced from 401.2 MHz to 362.1 MHz, which is that Au can make a larger mass-load effect and a lower phase velocity on the LWRs. Furthermore, the R_m of LWRs with Au IDTs using IDT-Ground and IDT-Floating structures are 198.93 Ω and 210.6 Ω, respectively, which are much higher than that of the LWRs with Al IDTs. On the contrary, their R_s values (1.25 Ω and 2.39 Ω) are lower than that of the LWRs with Al IDTs, due to the better stability and smaller contact resistance of Au IDTs. By comparison, the great increase of R_m values has the dominant influence on their Q values, and their Q values are 978.3 and 862.1, respectively, which is much smaller than that of the Al IDT LWRs. The acoustic impedance values of AlN, Al, and Au are 1061 C/m², 436 C/m², and 1162 C/m², respectively, and the better acoustic impedance matching between AlN and Au will cause serious acoustic-energy dissipation [30].

The LWRs with the extended lateral reflection boundary width of 12 μm are summarized and compared in

Table 3. The key performance parameters of the fabricated resonators, and compared with previous ones.

	Ref. [31]	Ref. [32]	Ref. [33]	Ref. [34]	This Work	This Work
fs (MHz)	457.1	400.3	483	504	401.2	401.2
Qs	1150	1482	1750	1647	4019.8	4457.8
k2eff	1.8%	1.19%	1.0%	1.24%	0.6%	0.94%
fs·Qs	5.25 × 1011	5.93 × 1011	8.45 × 1011	8.18 × 1011	16.1 × 1011	17.9 × 1011
FoM	20.7	17.6	17.5	20.4	24.1	41.9

[31,32,33,34]. With IDT-Ground and IDT-Floating structures, the f_s·Q_s values of the fabricated LWRs can reach 1.61 × 10¹² and 1.78 × 10¹², respectively. The Figure of Merit (FoM = Q_s·k²_eff) is always used to estimate the resonators’ performance. In this work, benefiting from the suppressed 8th-S0 mode by widening the reflection boundary by 12 μm, the FoM values of the fabricated resonators are as high as 24.11 and 41.90, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the LWRs with high quality-factor and spectrum-clean have been reported. The generation mechanism of the transverse modes in LWRs was theoretically analyzed. Through theoretical analysis and experimental verification, it is confirmed that the transverse modes can be effectively suppressed by using the optimal lateral reflection boundary width, which is contributed to by the change of the transverse propagation path to weaken the transverse modes’ coupling and wave guiding. The Q_s value of the IDT-Ground LWR is similar to that of the IDT-Floating LWR, but it has higher Q_p value due to its smaller electric loss, which has been systematically analyzed by using MBVD extracted equivalent electrical parameters. Moreover, the appropriate width of IDT electrodes can minimize the summation of acoustic loss, intrinsic material loss, interface loss and electric loss, conducive to achieving the maximum Q_s value. The LWRs were successfully fabricated by using a process, and the process can define the releasing cavities to prevent the XeF₂ etching of the inactive region. The measured results show that the optimized LWR can obtain Q_s and Q_p values as high as 4019.8 and 839.5, respectively, meanwhile, it has good spectral purity. Compared to the Au-IDT LWR, the Al-IDT LWR can achieve higher Q values due to its smaller acoustic loss, which is mainly contributed to by a higher degree of acoustic impedance mismatch between Al and AlN.