Next Article in Journal
Very High-Aspect-Ratio Polymeric Micropillars Made by Two-Photon Polymerization
Next Article in Special Issue
Review on Main Gate Characteristics of P-Type GaN Gate High-Electron-Mobility Transistors
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Empirical Formula Modeling Method Using Neuro-Space Mapping for Coupled Microstrip Lines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ternary Full Adder Designs Employing Unary Operators and Ternary Multiplexers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Behavior and Role of Organic Additives for Self-Doped CsPbI3 Perovskite Semiconductor Thin Films

by
Tamiru Kebede
1,2,
Mulualem Abebe
1,
Dhakshnamoorthy Mani
1,
Jibin Keloth Paduvilan
3,
Lishin Thottathi
4,
Aparna Thankappan
5,
Sabu Thomas
6,
Sarfaraz Kamangar
7,
Abdul Saddique Shaik
7,
Irfan Anjum Badruddin
7,
Fekadu Gochole Aga
8,9 and
Jung Yong Kim
8,9,*
1
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia
2
Department of Physics, College of Natural and Computational Science, Bonga University, Bonga P.O. Box 334, Ethiopia
3
School of Chemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam 686560, India
4
Department of Physics and Mathematics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via della Garzetta, 48, 25133 Brescia, BS, Italy
5
Department of Physics, Baselius College, Kottayam 686001, India
6
School of Energy Materials, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam 686560, India
7
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama P.O. Box 1888, Ethiopia
9
Center of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama P.O. Box 1888, Ethiopia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(8), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081601
Submission received: 18 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023

Abstract

:
The phase change of all-inorganic cesium lead halide (CsPbI3) thin film from yellow δ-phase to black γ-/α-phase has been a topic of interest in the perovskite optoelectronics field. Here, the main focus is how to secure a black perovskite phase by avoiding a yellow one. In this work, we fabricated a self-doped CsPbI3 thin film by incorporating an excess cesium iodide (CsI) into the perovskite precursor solution. Then, we studied the effect of organic additive such as 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO), 1-chloronaphthalene (CN), and 1,8-octanedithiol (ODT) on the optical, structural, and morphological properties. Specifically, for elucidating the binary additive–solvent solution thermodynamics, we employed the Flory–Huggins theory based on the oligomer level of additives’ molar mass. Resultantly, we found that the miscibility of additive–solvent displaying an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) behavior is in the sequence CN:DMF > ODT:DMF > DIO:DMF, the trends of which could be similarly applied to DMSO. Finally, the self-doping strategy with additive engineering should help fabricate a black γ-phase perovskite although the mixed phases of δ-CsPbI3, γ-CsPbI3, and Cs4PbI6 were observed under ambient conditions. However, the results may provide insight for the stability of metastable γ-phase CsPbI3 at room temperature.

1. Introduction

Metal halide perovskites (MHPs) have the general formula of ABX3, where A is methyl ammonium (MA) CH3NH3+, formamidinium (FA) CH(NH2)2+, methylhydrazinium CH3(NH2)2+, aziridinium (CH2)2NH2+, cesium (Cs), or rubidium(Rb); B is lead (Pb), tin (Sn) or manganese (Mn); and X is halide (Cl, Br, I) or its mixture [1,2,3,4]. MHPs can serve as a semiconducting active layer for photovoltaic (PV) cells, photodetectors (PD), light-emitting diodes (LEDs), field-effect transistors (FETs), and sensors [5,6]. Due to the thermal instability of organic cations, all-inorganic cesium lead halide (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I) becomes an alternative material by incorporating the inorganic cesium instead of MA or FA [7,8,9,10,11]. CsPbX3 is known to have long charge carrier diffusion length, strong light absorption, defect tolerance, thermal tolerance, narrow spectral bandwidth, tunable direct bandgap, high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY), and solution/melt processability [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of all-inorganic CsPbX3 perovskite solar cells (PeSC) has reached ~21.15% [25] whereas the best PCE of FAPbI3 solar cell is ~26% in 2023 [26].
Among cesium lead halides, the cubic phase α-CsPbI3 has the smallest tolerance factor t = ( r A + r X ) / { 2 ( r B + r X ) } = 0.805, where r A , r B , and r X are the radius of cation A, cation B, and anion X, respectively [27,28]. This t value slightly falls out from the structural stability condition of 0.813 ≤ t ≤ 1.107, indicating that α-CsPbI3 may undergo a rapid phase transformation below 320 °C [29]. Hence, α-CsPbI3 (black cubic) is structurally unstable and converted into β-CsPbI3 (black tetragonal), γ-CsPbI3, (black orthorhombic), and δ-CsPbI3 (yellow orthorhombic) at room temperature [30,31,32]. Specifically, δ-CsPbI3 is non-perovskite but thermodynamically most stable at room temperature, suggesting that this phase should be avoided for perovskite optoelectronics. However, because of its energy bandgap (Eg) of 1.73 eV [11] affording significant photon harvesting, CsPbI3 has received more attention than the other cesium-led halides (CsPbCl3 with Eg = 3.03 eV and CsPbBr3 Eg = 2.23 eV) for PeSC applications [33,34,35,36]. In this process, the researchers tried to overcome the intrinsic phase instability of CsPbI3 through additive engineering, quantum dots, dimension engineering, composition engineering, metal ion doping, solvent engineering, surface/defects passivation, and interfacial engineering [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].
In 2015, Snaith and coworkers demonstrated the working all-inorganic CsPbI3 solar cell for the first time, in which hydroiodic acid (HI) was identified to stabilize γ-CsPbI3 at a relatively lower temperature, ~100 °C [45]. Marronnier et al. observed the temperature-dependent phase transformation from orthorhombic to cubic (δ→α) upon heating but cubic–tetragonal–orthorhombic (α→β→γ) upon undercooling, indicating that CsPbI3 could temporally retain its black γ-phase at room temperature [46]. Zhang et al. improved the crystal structure stability of γ-CsPbI3 through interface engineering by depositing γ-CsPbI3 on top of iodine-doped reduced graphene oxide [47]. Wang et al. enhanced the γ-phase CsPbI3 stability and minimized trap density by controlling crystallization dynamics using chlorine doping [48]. Liu and coworkers demonstrated that the γ-phase could be stabilized by reducing defect densities acting as both recombination center and ion migration space, for which they employed an acyloin ligand (1,2-di(thiophen-2-yl)ethane-1,2-dione (DED)) as a phase stabilizer and defect passivator [25]. Huang et al. recognized that the intrinsic instability of the γ-phase originates from the small ion radius of cesium. Hence, to solve this problem, they incorporated small amounts of poly(alkyl amine hydrochloride) (PAACl) additive to the perovskite precursor solution and improved the stability of γ-phase CsPbI3 [49]. Vaynzof and coworkers demonstrated the fabrication of a relatively stable γ-CsPbI3 thin film through co-evaporation of CsI and PbI2 with a small amount of phenylethylammonium iodide (PEAI), affording a preferable crystal orientation (columnar domains) with reduced defect densities [50]. Recently, Zhou and coworkers identified the excess CsI itself (i.e., more than 1 = CsI/PbI2) preferred a formation of black γ-phase to yellow δ-phase, which is interesting in that it used a self-component rather than external one [51].
Additive engineering has been frequently employed for enhancing the performances of both polymer solar cells (PSCs) and PeSCs [38,52,53]. In the case of PSCs, the phase-separation scale should be controlled within the exciton diffusion length (~10–47 nm depending on fullerene or non-fullerene acceptor and conjugated polymer) [54,55,56]. On the other hand, in the PeSCs, it is important to control the nucleation and crystal growth of perovskite from the colloidal dispersion via intermediate phase engineering (IPE) [57,58], which is used for obtaining a high-quality perovskite layer (ideally a single crystal but practically a polycrystal with minimized defects). Specifically, 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO), 1-chloronaphthalene (CN), and 1,8-octanedithiol (ODT) have been commonly used for organic electronics [59,60,61,62,63].
In 2007, Heeger and coworkers demonstrated that the addition of a few volume percent of alkanedithiols including ODT has contributed to the enhancement of PCE from 2.8% to 5.5% through improving the bulk heterojunction morphology of PSCs [64,65]. Then in the next year, the same group identified that DIO was the best among 1,8-di(R)octanes (R: SH, Cl, Br, I, and CO2CH3) and suggested two criteria: (a) selective solubility of the electron acceptor and (b) high boiling point of additive [65]. Then, to date, this additive strategy has been continuously applied for non-fullerene-acceptor (NFA)-based PSCs as well as all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) [59,66]. However, in the field of PeSCs, the conventional solvent additives such as DIO, CN, and ODT are relatively less studied for all-inorganic PeSCs although there are some for the hybrid PeSCs [67,68,69,70,71]. For example, in 2014, Jen and coworkers demonstrated that the bidentate halogenated additive, DIO can enhance the crystallization of MAPbCl3 [67]. In 2015, Chen and coworkers proved that the CN additive is beneficial to regulating the crystallization of MAPbI3−xClx [68]. In 2018, Peng et al. observed that the DIO additive also could enhance the crystallinity of MAPbI3−xClx [69]. In the same year, Tsai et al. proved that DIO is useful for the crystallinity, coverage, and uniformity of the MAPbI3 thin film for PeSCs [70]. Then, recently, Ghorai et al. reported the ligand-mediated revival of degraded α-phase CsPbI3 nanocrystals by using 1-dodecanethiol (DSH), in which a heavily distorted α-CsPbI3 could be converted to the cubic CsPbI3 phase via the trigonal Cs4PbI6 through the etching with the surface ligand/passivator, DSH [71].
In this study, we studied an all-inorganic CsPbI3 perovskite thin film doped with the excess cesium iodide with molar ration, CsI/PbI2 = 2, which was inspired by Zhou et al.’s interesting results with CsI/PbI2 = 1, 1.05, 1.5, and 4 in a nitrogen-filled glove box [51]. However, in our case, we carried out all the experiments in an ambient condition, indicating that the results may suggest air processibility and stability for the CsPbI3 thin film. However, note that, compared to N2 environment in a glove box, if we process the perovskite thin film in air, the humidity (H2O molecules) may affect the crystallization process of perovskite intermediates, which was explained by Lin and coworkers in detail [72]. Then, we examined the organic additive (DIO, CN, and ODT) effects on the structural, optical, and morphological properties of the self-doped CsPbI3 thin film for the first time. Hence, through this work, the dual effects, self-dopant and external additives, can be elucidated in air. Furthermore, we report the phase behavior of a binary additive–solvent system for the first time based on the Flory–Huggins theory, presenting the role of additive in a typical solvent (DMF and DMSO) medium used for perovskite electronics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The materials used for the experimental works are lead iodide (PbI2, 99.99%%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), cesium iodide (CsI, 99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), DMF (99.5%, AR chemicals, Delhi, India), DMSO (99%, AR chemicals, Delhi, India), chlorobenzene (≥99.5%, AR chemicals, Delhi, India), 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO, 98%, TCI chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), 1-chloronephtaline (CN, 99%, TCI chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), and 1,8-octanediithiol (ODT, 95%, TCI chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), which were used as received without further purification.

2.2. Methods

The perovskite precursors (0.8 mmol CsI and 0.4 mmol PbI2 without/with organic additives) were dissolved in the solvent mixtures of 600 μL DMF and 400 μL DMSO and stirred overnight at room temperature. Here, the additive was DIO, CN, or ODT, which was 2% of the DMF/DMSO-mixed solvents by volume. Then, the perovskite precursor solution was filtered using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter with 0.22 μm pore size. Then, 70 μL of colloidal perovskite precursor dispersion was dispensed on the top of ITO glass substrate. Here, the spin coating was processed with 1000 rpm for 10 s and then 4000 rpm for 40 s. During spinning (after ~20 s), 200 μL CB antisolvent was dispensed on top of the wet perovskite precursor film. Then, the thin film samples were gently annealed on a hotplate at 120 °C for 10 min and cooled down to room temperature for further characterization. Note that Zhou et al. [51] annealed their thin film at 320 °C (i.e., a phase transition temperature for black α-phase CsPbI3 with cubic structure) for 3 s in a N2-filled glove box. However, we processed our thin film in air without transferring it to a glove box because we have interest in the air stability of all-inorganic CsPbI3 samples.

2.3. Characterization

The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption data were obtained using UV-vis spectroscopy (SHIMADZU UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan). The photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra of the self-doped CsPbI3 thin films were acquired using a spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU RF-6000, Kyoto, Japan) at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm. The PL decay curves were recorded by using time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) (model: Fluorolog 3 TCSPC, Horiba, Houston, TX, USA). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained by using a high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM, Model: JEOL, JEM-2100, Peabody, MA, USA) with an operating voltage of 200 kV. The structural properties of the self-doped CsPbI3 thin films were investigated by using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyzer (model: the Rigaku mini flex-300/600 diffractometer, Tokyo, Japan). The microstructural morphologies of the thin films were characterized by using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, MAIA 3XMH TESCAN, Kohoutovice, Czech Republic). The atomic force microscopy (AMF) tapping-mode images were obtained by using the Park NX10 AFM (Park Systems, Suwon, Republic of Korea). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis was performed in transmittance mode by using the PerkinElmer Spectrum Two FT-IR Spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Here, the attenuated total reflection (ATR) was employed to record the FT-IR spectra of the self-doped CsPbI3 thin films without/with organic additives in the range 4000–400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 [73].

2.4. Computational Methods

The electronic band structures of the unit cells (δ-CsPbI3 and γ-CsPbI3) were calculated using Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package software (CASTEP, Materials Studio 2017, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) parametrization of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used to portray the exchange correlation functional. The unit cell in the Brillouin zone was employed to estimate the electronic band structures. For geometry optimization, the energy, maximum force, maximum displacement, and maximum stress were 5 × 10−5 eV/atom, 0.01 eV/Å, 5 × 10−4 Å, and 0.02 GPa, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the chemical structures of (a) additives (DIO, CN, and ODT) and (b) solvents (DMF, DMSO, and CB). Here, CB was used as an antisolvent during the solvent engineering process. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the properties of additives and solvents, respectively. Specifically, DMF and DMSO have Gutmann’s donor number (DN) of 26.6 kcal/mol and 29.8 kcal/mol whereas CB has DN = 3.3 kcal/mol, indicating that DMF and DMSO can have strong coordination bonding with haloplumbate containing Lewis acid Pb2+ but CB cannot [74]. Therefore, the less polar CB molecule could act as an antisolvent, which has a weaker basicity as well as a smaller solubility parameter (δ) of 9.5 (cal/cm3)1/2 than the other two solvents (DMF and DMSO) [73,75].
In this study, for preparing a perovskite precursor solution, we used mixed solvents composed of DMF:DMSO = 3:2 volume ratio according to the literature report [79]. Then, we added DIO, CN, or ODT as a solvent additive into the perovskite precursor solution, resulting in a change in solvent quality, good or poor. Hence, we investigated the phase behavior of binary additive–solvent systems. Note that although we used a mixed DMF:DMSO solvent system, we should decouple it for understanding phase behavior theoretically.
The Flory–Huggins theory can describe polymer solution thermodynamics [80,81,82]. In this study, the processing solvent additives can be treated as an oligomer. Note that oligomer has a molecular weight whose degree of polymerization ≤10. Compared to the solvents such as DMF and DMSO, the molecular size of the organic additives (DIO, CN, and ODT) falls into the oligomer level (see Table 1 and Table 2). Hence, for the binary additive-solvent mixture modeled as an oligomer–solvent system, the Gibbs free energy of mixing could be expressed as Equation (1) according to Flory–Huggins theory [80],
Δ G m i x R T = ϕ 1 r 1 ln ϕ 1 + ϕ 2 r 2 ln ϕ 2 + χ 12 ϕ 1 ϕ 2
where ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 , r 1 , and r 2 are the volume fraction and relative molar volumes of components 1 (solvent) and 2 (additive), respectively. In addition, R (=1.987 cal/(K·mol)) and T (K) are the gas constant and temperature, respectively. Importantly, the χ 12 interaction parameter could be defined as χ 12 = V ^ 1 / R T ( δ 1 δ 2 ) 2 [80,83], where V ^ 1 is the molar volume of solvent whereas δ 1 and δ 2 are the solubility parameter of component 1 and 2, respectively. Table 3 shows the χ 12 and r 2 for each system when r 1 = 1 for a solvent (DMF or DMSO). Then, the binodal curve can be calculated based on the below two equilibrium equations.
Δ μ 1 α = Δ μ 1 β
Δ μ 2 α = Δ μ 2 β
where Δ μ i = Δ G m i x / n i is the chemical potential of component, i   ( = 1 ,   2 ) , and α and β are oligomer-lean phase and oligomer-rich phase, respectively [80,81,82,83].
Figure 2 shows the temperature–composition phase diagrams (i.e., the binodal curves) of (a) additive:DMF and (b) additive:DMSO systems, which were constructed by solving Equations (2) and (3) simultaneously. First of all, the original Flory–Huggins theory can capture a big essential picture without losing the physical meaning [80], indicating that we should understand the predicted phase behavior qualitatively, not quantitatively. Second, as indicated in Table 3, the phase behavior is largely governed by χ 12   and   r 2 . Third, small χ 12 denotes better miscibility between additive and solvent, indicating that the additive–DMF system is better miscible than the additive–DMSO system (see Table 3). In Figure 2, the additive–solvent miscibility has a similar sequence for both solvents, (a) CN:DMF > ODT:DMF > DIO:DMF for the additive–DMF solution, and (b) CN:DMSO > ODT:DMSO > DIO:DMSO for the additive–DMSO solution. However, the additive–DMF solution shows the immiscibility region below room temperature (<300 K) whereas the additive–DMSO solution displays it at a higher temperature (<1000 K, theoretically), indicating that the additive–DMF system has a better miscibility than the additive–DMSO mixture. Hence, in the DMF:DMSO = 3:2 mixture, if we employ an organic additive, the solvent quality is going to be poor specifically because additive is not much miscible with DMSO. Hence, we can expect that versatile iodide plumbate ( PbI n 2 n with n = 2–6) are going to be more aggregated (i.e., self-interactions are increased) if the additive is present in the perovskite precursor solution. Here, it is noteworthy that (1) the perovskite precursor solution is a colloidal dispersion, and (2) DMF and the DMF–DMSO mixture are retrograde solvent systems [84,85]. Hence, the addition of organic additive has a similar effect on the rise in temperature in the sense that the self-interactions among haloplumbate are enhanced, which may affect the perovskite crystallization process, resulting in a different morphology of the final perovskite thin films. See Figure S1 and Table S1 in Supplementary Materials for the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter at 298 K (=25 °C).
At room temperature, the thermodynamically stable phase for CsPbI3 is yellow δ-phase [11,31,32]. However, when the temperature is increased to 587 K, it can undergo a phase transition into the black α-phase [31,32,33,34]. Then when α-phase is cooled down, it can transform to β-phase at 554 K and to γ-phase at 457 K. Hence, at room temperature, CsPbI3 could stay in yellow δ-phase (Figure 3a) or black γ-phase (Figure 3b), which are both orthorhombic. In this work, to escape the yellow δ-phase (i.e., non-perovskite), we added excess CsI into the perovskite precursor solution, which we call ‘self-doping’ because the excess CsI can serve as an interstitial dopant or stay at the surface of perovskite crystals. However, when we add excess CsI, it is known that Cs4PbI6 could be formed together with γ-phase CsPbI3 [86] (see Figure S2 for the trigonal phase of Cs4PbI6). For clarification, at this moment, it is noteworthy that in the field of conjugated polymers, ‘self-doping’ indicates that charge injected into the π–electron system of a conjugated polyelectrolyte with the potential counterions is compensated by cation (or anion) migration, leaving behind the negatively (or positively) charged counterions [87,88]. However, here we use ‘self-doping’ for the case of the perovskite doped with its own component (e.g., interstitial doping and/or surface passivation).
Figure 4a,b show the electronic band structure for (Figure 4a) yellow δ-phase and (Figure 4b) black γ-phase CsPbI3, which was calculated based on the unit cell structure shown in Figure 3. Figure 4c,d display the density of states for structure for δ-phase and γ-phase CsPbI3, respectively. Here, the estimated energy bandgap is 2.87 eV for δ-phase and 1.90 eV for γ-phase, respectively. The results are slightly larger than the experimental values explained below.
Figure 5a,b show UV-vis absorption spectra for (a) the yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (b) the self-doped CsPbI3 without/with three organic additives (DIO, CN, and ODT). As shown in Figure 5a, when CsI:PbI2 = 1:1 under ambient conditions, the resulting structure is a yellow δ-phase orthorhombic crystal (recall Figure 3a). On the other hand, Figure 5c,d display the determination of bandgap based on Tauc plot, ( α h ν ) 2 vs. h ν , where α is absorption coefficient, h is Plank’s constant, and ν is the frequency of incident photon [89]. Resultantly, the yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 exhibits an optical bandgap ( E g ) of 2.84 eV at the wavelength ( λ , i.e., absorption edge) of 437 nm whereas the self-doped γ-phase CsPbI3 displays E g = 1.83 eV. However, when the organic additive (DIO, CN, and ODT) was incorporated into the perovskite precursor solution, the resulting film shows different energy bandgaps like E g = 1.78 eV at λ = 697 nm for DIO, E g = 1.76 eV at λ = 705 nm for CN, and E g = 2.59 eV at λ = 479 eV, confirming that the presence of additive affected the crystallization process of perovskite (γ-phase) and non-perovskite (δ-phase). Here, it is notable that when the organic additive (DIO or CN) was incorporated into the film, E g was reduced from 1.83 eV to 1.78 eV (DIO) or 1.76 eV (CN). This reduction suggests that the internal crystal structures of thin films were better organized when the additive was present in the perovskite precursor solution. On the contrary, when the organic additive CN was employed for the perovskite film process, E g was widened from 1.83 eV to 2.59 eV (but still smaller than E g = 2.84 eV of yellow δ-phase), indicating that the contribution of γ-phase CsPbI3 might be minimized in this sample. Here, we guess that if ODT is ionized (R–SH→R–S+ + H+) in the perovskite precursor solution, the octacarbon chainlike cation (-S+) may partly increase the d-spacing of perovskite layers just like low-dimensional perovskite [90,91,92,93] and/or the accompanying polarity change in a colloidal dispersion medium may induce the formation of more δ-CsPbI2 and Cs4PbI6 with a larger bandgap under ambient conditions.
Figure 6a shows the PL spectra of self-doped CsPbI3 without/with organic additives. Interestingly, the PL spectra exhibit two different peaks at ~636 nm and 590 nm for the self-doped CsPbI3 without additive (the black solid line in Figure 6a). However, when DIO, CN, and ODT were added for the self-doped CsPbI3, the PL peak positions were shifted to 627 nm/597 nm (DIO), 636 nm/583 nm (CN), and 637 nm/586 nm (ODT), respectively. Here, it is interesting that the PL peak position of ODT-added sample is comparable to those of others, which is different from the results of UV-vis spectra in Figure 5b. One possibility is that in Figure 5b, there is a small bump around ~600 nm, which might be partially linked to the above PL emission. Here, it is noteworthy that the environmental condition was air (not a controlled glove box), making the samples exhibit diverse characteristics (i.e., the degree of internal phase transformation might be different). Figure 6b displays the time-resolved PL (TRPL) decay curve of self-doped CsPbI3 without/with organic additives. First of all, the decay curve shows two steps, i.e., a normal decay and additional small bump, which makes the regular model (single, double, triple exponential fitting) not suitable for describing the PL decay data. Hence, according to the literature report [90], we estimate the PL lifetime at the 63% decay point in Figure 6b. Resultantly, the PL lifetime is ~1.1 ns (self-doped CsPbI3, DIO, and CN) and ~0.9 ns (for self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT). However, as shown in Figure 6b, there are PL decay tail curves, indicating that DIO > CN > ODT ≈ ‘without additive’. Therefore, it seems that the additive engineering contributed to the slight enhancement in PL lifetime.
Importantly, for understanding both the two PL peaks and the two-step PL decay, we examined a high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) image for the self-doped CsPbI3. As shown in Figure 7, the selected area diffraction pattern (Figure 7a) as well as the high-resolution TEM image (Figure 7b) could be identified, displaying the nanocrystals embedded in the crystalline matrix. Hence, we assume that these nanostructures might be related with the two PL peaks as well as the two-step TRPL decay curves. As an example, we selectively checked another sample, the self-doped CsPbI3 with the additive ODT; the result can be found in Figure S3, displaying a similar nanostructural image, i.e., the nanocrystal domains embedded in the crystalline matrix.
Figure 8a shows the XRD pattern of self-doped CsPbI3 without additive whereas Figure 8b displays the XRD patterns of self-doped CsPbI3 with the organic additives, DIO, CN, and ODT, which may highlight the results of air-processed cesium lead iodide samples. First of all, when CsPbI3 was prepared with excess CsI, we observed γ-phase CsPbI3 with an orthorhombic structure. However, at room temperature, the most stable structure is unfortunately δ-phase CsPbI3. Specifically, when γ-phase CsPbI3 is exposed to a humid condition, it is known that it transforms into the stable δ-phase CsPbI3 (non-perovskite, as shown in Figure 3a) [94]. Furthermore, the excess CsI compounds afford the formation of the trigonal Cs4PbI6 phase. Hence, as shown in Figure 8a, the self-doped CsPbI3 shows the XRD patterns mainly originating from three compounds such as γ-/δ-phase orthorhombic CsPbI3 and trigonal Cs4PbI6 [95]. Note that in this study, the reaction condition was 2CsI + PbI2, which could be a source for the reactions of CsI + PbI2 and 4CsI + PbI2, producing γ-/δ-CsPbI3 and Cs4PbI6 and others. Interestingly, Cs4PbI6 is known to be used for synthesizing CsPbI3 compounds [86]. Hence, as shown in Figure 8a, the self-doped CsPbI3 sample’s black γ-phase exhibits XRD peaks at 2θ = 13.9°, 19.9°, 28.1°, 32.1°, and 41.3°, corresponding to the orthorhombic crystallographic planes, (020), (200), (040), (013), and (242), respectively. On the other hand, its yellow δ-phase displays the XRD peaks at 2θ = 10.6°, 13.2°, 27.2°, 31.2°, and 36.8°, corresponding to the crystallographic planes, (002), (102), (122), (016), and (043), respectively. Note that for this peak assignment, referring to the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), 4,127,359 and 27,979 were used for γ-phase and δ-phase, respectively. In the case of Cs4PbI6, the XRD peaks are observed at 2θ = 12.0°, 23.4°, 26.4°, 42.0°, and 53.9°, corresponding to the trigonal crystallographic planes, (012), (300), (131), (060), and (354), respectively [91]. Figure 8b shows the XRD patterns for the self-doped CsPbI3 with versatile organic additives, DIO (brown), CN (violet), and ODT (green solid line). As shown in Figure 8b, in the case of the green-colored data, additional small-multiple peaks were observed, indicating that their phase purity is worst among the samples. Only the self-doped CsPbI3 ( E g = 2.59 eV) with the additive ODT displayed a significant blue shift in UV-vis spectra in Figure 5b,d, indicating that the useful black γ-phase might have been minimized when ODT was employed as an organic additive for the self-doped CsPbI3.
Figure 9 shows a SEM image of the self-doped CsPbI3 without/with organic additives DIO, CN, and ODT. The self-doped CsPbI3 without additive displays the rod-like textural morphology (Figure 9a) whereas the self-doped CsPbI3 with additives shows some common nanoscale spots on the surface of films (Figure 9b–d), which is in line with Kim et al.’s report [96]. However, depending on the additive species, the morphology is somewhat different. The self-doped CsPbI3 with DIO shows multiple domains whereas the sample with CN exhibits a relatively flat image. Interestingly, the self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT displays some abnormal texture in the diagonal direction (flow-like image), indicating that the film is not uniform because of the ODT’s special character (e.g., probably the ionizability of ODT; in this case, there might be coulombic interactions and chemical reactions between thiol with haloplumbate in the perovskite precursor solution state). AFM tapping mode images can be found in Figure S4, in which the self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT shows a rod-like shape instead of granular spots, indicating that the sample could be nonuniform (from different degrees of phase transformation) when processed in air.
Finally, we investigated whether or not the organic additive stays with the self-doped CsPbI3 based on FT-IR spectroscopy. Accordingly, we obtained Figure 10, explaining the functional group in the sample compounds. Largely speaking, the self-doped CsPbI3 without/with additive (DIO or CN) showed characteristic FT-IR spectra with three main peaks at 894 cm−1, 758 cm−1, and ~443 cm−1 [97], indicating that DIO and CN molecules, like other solvents such as DMF/DMSO, did not stay in the perovskite film after thermal annealing at 120 °C for 10 min (within the detection limit of IR instrument). However, in the case of the ODT-added sample, the film displays several additional peaks at 3774 cm−1, 2920–2848 cm−1, and 1483 cm−1, originating from O–H vibration (from absorbed water) and/or C–C stretching vibration, C–H stretching, and C–H scissoring, respectively [98,99,100,101]. The presence of C–H vibration from ODT’s alkyl moiety indicates that ODT could be ionized (i.e., R–SH→R–S + H+) and reacted with the perovskite precursor (haloplumbate). Note that alkylthiol (e.g., ODT) has been used to form a self-assembled monolayer on the surface of metal nanoparticles through the reaction between thiolate anion (RS) and metal (e.g., Au) [102], suggesting the binding reaction between thiolate anion and haloplumbate (specifically, soft lead element).

4. Conclusions

We demonstrated that self-doped CsPbI3 with CsI:PbI2 = 2:1 could be useful for retaining a black γ-phase mixture by escaping a pure yellow non-perovskite δ-phase under ambient conditions. In addition, when DIO and CN were employed as an organic additive, the crystallization process was partially modified, leading to the energy bandgap of 1.78 eV (DIO) and 1.76 eV (CN) instead of 1.83 eV (without additive). However, in the case of the CsPbI3 with ODT, the bandgap becomes wider, e.g., ~2.59 eV, which might originate from the ionizability of ODT affecting the crystallization process. Interestingly, the PL spectra shows two emission peaks and the PL decay curves displayed two steps, suggesting a compound mixture, about which HR-TEM showed the embedded nanodomains in a crystalline matrix. In the case of additive-solvent’s phase behavior, the predicted miscibility is CN:DMF (or DMSO) > ODT:DMF (or DMSO) > DIO:DMF (or DMSO) based on the Flory–Huggins theory. Specifically, the additive is less miscible with DMSO, indicating that the presence of additive (DIO, CN, and ODT) makes the solvent medium poorer than that without additive. Future work may include the tunability of the phase purity for self-doped CsPbI3 perovskite under ambient conditions for perovskite solar cell applications. Finally, considering the interchangeability between two orthorhombic phases (γ-phase and δ-phase) and between two crystalline compounds (Cs4PbI6 and CsPbI3), our results provide insight into the stability of γ-phase CsPbI3 perovskite thin film. In other words, the meta-stable γ-phase thin film processed under a controlled environment (e.g., N2-filled glove box) undergoes a phase transformation and thereby the phase purity decreases with time.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mi14081601/s1; Figure S1: Flory–Huggins interaction parameter at 298 K as a function of organic additive species. Figure S2: Crystal structure of trigonal Cs4PbI6 with space group R-3c. Figure S3: High-resolution TEM images of cesium lead iodide thin films: (a) without organic additive and (b) with organic additive, ODT. Figure S4: AFM tapping-mode height image. (a) Self-doped CsPbI3 without any additive, (b) self-doped CsPbI3 with DIO, (c) self-doped CsPbI3 with CN, and (d) self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT. Table S1: Flory–Huggins χ12 interaction parameter at 298 K as a function of organic additive species.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, I.A.B. and J.Y.K.; conceptualization, T.K., M.A., D.M., A.T., S.T., I.A.B. and J.Y.K.; methodology, T.K. and J.Y.K.; software, T.K., S.K., A.S.S. and F.G.A.; formal analysis and investigation, T.K., S.K., A.S.S. and J.Y.K.; resources, A.T., S.T., I.A.B. and J.Y.K.; data curation, T.K., J.K.P., L.T., S.K. and A.S.S.; supervision and project administration, M.A., D.M., A.T., S.T., I.A.B. and J.Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Group Research Project under grant number RGP.2/201/44.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Jimma and Bonga Universities are acknowledged for supporting T.K.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gidey, A.T.; Kim, J.Y. Tuning the crystallization process of perovskite active layer using a functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced photovoltaic performance. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 12257–12268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gidey, A.T.; Assayehegn, E.; Kim, J.Y. Hydrophilic Surface-Driven Crystalline Grain Growth of Perovskites on Metal Oxides. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 6923–6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma̧czka, M.; Ptak, M.; Ga̧gor, A.; Stefańska, D.; Zarȩba, J.K.; Sieradzki, A. Methylhydrazinium Lead Bromide: Noncentrosymmetric Three-Dimensional Perovskite with Exceptionally Large Framework Distortion and Green Photoluminescence. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stefańska, D.; Ptak, M.; Ma̧czka, M. Synthesis, Photoluminescence and Vibrational Properties of Aziridinium Lead Halide Perovskites. Molecules 2022, 27, 7949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sun, J.; Wu, J.; Tong, X.; Lin, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.M. Organic/Inorganic Metal Halide Perovskite Optoelectronic Devices beyond Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, K.; Liu, D.; Zhao, L.; Chen, D.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C. Recent Progress of Film Fabrication Process for Carbon-Based All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Crystals 2023, 13, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moot, T.; Marshall, A.R.; Wheeler, L.M.; Habisreutinger, S.N.; Tracy, H.; Boyd, C.C.; Dikova, D.R.; Pach, G.F.; Hazarika, A.; Mcgehee, D.; et al. CsI-Antisolvent Adduct Formation in All-Inorganic Metal Halide Perovskites. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murugadoss, G.; Thangamuthu, R.; Senthil Kumar, S.M.; Anandhan, N.; Rajesh Kumar, M.; Rathishkumar, A. Synthesis of Ligand-Free, Large Scale with High Quality All-Inorganic CsPbI3 and CsPb2Br5 Nanocrystals and Fabrication of All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 787, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulbak, M.; Gupta, S.; Kedem, N.; Levine, I.; Bendikov, T.; Hodes, G.; Cahen, D. Cesium Enhances Long-Term Stability of Lead Bromide Perovskite-Based Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Semiconducting Tin and Lead Iodide Perovskites with Organic Cations: Phase Transitions, High Mobilities, and Near-Infrared Photoluminescent Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 9019–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eperon, G.E.; Stranks, S.D.; Menelaou, C.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M.; Snaith, H.J. Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeng, L.; Chen, S.; Forberich, K.; Brabec, C.J.; Mai, Y.; Guo, F. Controlling the Crystallization Dynamics of Photovoltaic Perovskite Layers on Larger-Area Coatings. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4666–4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ding, N.; Wu, Y.; Xu, W.; Lyu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zi, L.; Shao, L.; Sun, R.; Wang, N.; Liu, S. A novel approach for designing efficient broadband photodetectors expanding from deep ultraviolet to near infrared. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cao, L.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Du, L.; Chen, S.; Zhao, S.; Wang, C. Recent Progress in All-Inorganic Metal Halide Nanostructured Perovskites: Materials Design, Optical Properties, and Application. Front. Phys. 2021, 16, 33201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, J.; Fan, Z.; Dong, J. Research Progress of Green Solvent in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zeng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, C.; Feng, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B. Inorganic CsPbI2Br Perovskite Solar Cells: The Progress and Perspective. Sol. RRL 2019, 3, 1800239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dong, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Dai, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q. Recent Advances toward Practical Use of Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 21729–21746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Faridi, A.W.; Imran, M.; Tariq, G.H.; Ullah, S.; Noor, S.F.; Ansar, S.; Sher, F. Synthesis and Characterization of High-Efficiency Halide Perovskite Nanomaterials for Light-Absorbing Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 4494–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hasan, M.S.; Alom, J.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Ahmed, M.B.; Hossain, M.D.; Saem, A.; Masud, J.; Thakare, J.; Hossain, M.A. Recent Criterion on Stability Enhancement of Perovskite Solar Cells. Processes 2022, 10, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.; Su, J.; Lin, Z.; He, J.; Zhou, L.; Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Chang, J.; Hao, Y. Double Side Interfacial Optimization for Low-Temperature Stable CsPbI2Br Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency Beyond 16%. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 5, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kirakosyan, A.; Kim, Y.; Sihn, R.; Jeon, M.; Jeong, J. Solubility-Controlled Room-Temperature Synthesis of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. ChemNanoMat 2020, 6, 1863–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dong, Y.; Qiao, T.; Kim, D.; Parobek, D.; Rossi, D.; Son, D.H. Precise Control of Quantum Confinement in Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots via Thermodynamic Equilibrium. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 3716–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bioki, H.A.; Moshaii, A.; Zarandi, M.B. Improved Morphology, Structure and Optical Properties of CH3NH3PbI3 Film via HQ Additive in PbI2 Precursor Solution for Efficient and Stable Mesoporous Perovskite Solar Cells. Synth. Met. 2022, 283, 116965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, A.; Rana, N.K.; Rani, S.; Ghosh, D.S. Toward all-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells: Materials, performance, and stability. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 14659–14695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.; Che, Y.; Duan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.; Xu, D.; Fang, Z.; Lei, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, S. 21.15%-Efficiency and Stable γ -CsPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells Enabled by an Acyloin Ligand. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2210223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, J.; Kim, J.; Yun, H.-S.; Paik, M.J.; Noh, E.; Mun, H.J.; Kim, M.G.; Shin, T.J.; Seok, S.I. Controlled growth of perovskite layers with volatile alkylammonium chlorides. Nature 2023, 616, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, X.; Ge, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, R.; Xu, M.; Zhao, Z.; Lv, W.; Chen, R. Recent Advances in Enhancing and Enriching the Optical Properties of Cl-Based CsPbX3 Nanocrystals. Adv. Optical Mater. 2021, 9, 2100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiang, W.; Liu, S.F.; Tress, W. A review on the stability of inorganic metal halide perovskites: Challenges and opportunities for stable solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2090–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, Y.; Zhu, K. Organic–inorganic hybrid lead halide perovskites for optoelectronic and electronic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 655–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alaei, A.; Circelli, A.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lee, S.S. Polymorphism in metal halide perovskites. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, B.; Novendra, N.; Navrotsky, A. Energetics, Structures, and Phase Transitions of Cubic and Orthorhombic Cesium Lead Iodide (CsPbI3) Polymorphs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14501–14504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sutton, R.J.; Filip, M.R.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Sakai, N.; Wenger, B.; Giustino, F.; Snaith, H.J. Cubic or Orthorhombic? Revealing the Crystal Structure of Metastable Black-Phase CsPbI3 by Theory and Experiment. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, N.; Han, Y.; Zou, M.; Song, T. 1D Perovskitoid as Absorbing Material for Stable Solar Cells. Crystals 2021, 11, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, F.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Zhu, R. Challenges and Perspectives toward Future Wide-Bandgap Mixed-Halide Perovskite Photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2203911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, S.; Yu, B.; Cui, Y.; Meng, F.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, H.; Shi, J.; Luo, Y.; et al. Temperature-Reliable Low-Dimensional Perovskites Passivated Black-Phase CsPbI3 toward Stable and Efficient Photovoltaics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202201300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bian, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Yan, C.; Wang, H.; Liang, L.; Jin, Z.; Wang, G.; Liu, S. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for 80% Photoluminescence Quantum Yield for Inorganic γ-CsPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency beyond 16%. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 5740–5747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmad, M.; Rehman, G.; Ali, L.; Shafiq, M.; Iqbal, R.; Ahmad, R.; Khan, T.; Jalali-Asadabadi, S.; Maqbool, M.; Ahmad, I. Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of CsPbX3(X = Cl, Br, I) for Energy Storage and Hybrid Solar Cell Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 705, 828–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, F.; Zhu, K. Additive Engineering for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Han, B.; Liu, Z.; Yao, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; Lin, P.; Wu, X.; Yu, X.; Cui, C. Additive Engineering on Spiro-OMeTAD Hole Transport Material for CsPbI3 All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells with Improved Performance and Stability. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 911, 164972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khorshidi, E.; Rezaei, B.; Kavousighahfarokhi, A.; Hanisch, J.; Reus, M.A.; Mu, P.; Ameri, T. Antisolvent Additive Engineering for Boosting Performance and Stability of Graded Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells Using Amide-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 54623–54634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.; Bakr, O.M.; Sun, H.T. Metal-Doped Lead Halide Perovskites: Synthesis, Properties, and Optoelectronic Applications. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6589–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tian, J.; Wang, J.; Xue, Q.; Niu, T.; Yan, L.; Zhu, Z.; Li, N.; Brabec, C.J.; Yip, H.-L.; Cao, Y. Composition Engineering of All-Inorganic Perovskite Film for Efficient and Operationally Stable Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2001764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, H.; Zhang, J.; Gan, X.; Yu, L.; Yuan, H.; Shang, M.; Lu, C.; Hou, D.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Pb-Reduced CsPb0.9Zn0.1I2Br Thin Films for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, B.; Long, M.; Cai, M.-Q.; Yang, J. Interface engineering of CsPbI3-black phosphorus van der Waals heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 043901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Eperon, G.E.; Paternò, G.M.; Sutton, R.J.; Zampetti, A.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Cacialli, F.; Snaith, H.J. Inorganic caesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19688–19695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marronnier, A.; Roma, G.; Boyer-richard, S.; Pedesseau, L.; Jancu, J.; Bonnassieux, Y.; Katan, C.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Even, J. Anharmonicity and Disorder in the Black Phases of Cesium Lead Iodide Used for Stable Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3477–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, Y.; Tai, M.; Gu, Y.; Han, J.; Yin, X.; Li, J.; Lin, H. Improved phase stability of γ-CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals using the interface effect using iodine modified graphene oxide. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, K.; Jin, Z.; Liang, L.; Bian, H.; Wang, H.; Feng, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S. Chlorine doping for black γ-CsPbI3 solar cells with stabilized efficiency beyond 16%. Nano Energy 2019, 58, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, L.; Xu, P.; Yu, F.; Liu, J.; Shirai, Y.; Zhang, X.-P.; Li, C.-H.; Song, Y. A stabilized γ-CsPbI3 by poly(allylamine hydrochloride) for wide-band gap perovskites solar cells with enhanced performance. J. Solid State Chem. 2023, 324, 124087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Z.; Ji, R.; Kroll, M.; Hofstetter, Y.J.; Jia, X.; Becker-Koch, D.; Paulus, F.; Löffler, M.; Nehm, F.; Leo, K.; et al. Efficient Thermally Evaporated γ-CsPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2100299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qiu, Z.; Wang, F.; Wang, C.; Zhu, C.; Wang, H.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Li, N.; et al. Phase Transformation Barrier Modulation of CsPbI3 Films via PbI3− Complex for Efficient All-Inorganic Perovskite Photovoltaics. Nano Energy 2022, 99, 107338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pereyra, C.; Xie, H.; Lira-Cantu, M. Additive engineering for stable halide perovskite solar cells. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 60, 599–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mahapatra, A.; Prochowicz, D.; Tavakoli, M.M.; Trivedi, S.; Kumara, P.; Yadav, P. A review of aspects of additive engineering in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 27–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mikhnenko, O.V.; Blom, P.W.M.; Nguyen, T.-Q. Exciton diffusion in organic semiconductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1867–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tamai, Y.; Ohkita, H.; Benten, H.; Ito, S. Exciton Diffusion in Conjugated Polymers: From Fundamental Understanding to Improvement in Photovoltaic Conversion Efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 3417–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Firdaus, Y.; Le Corre, V.M.; Karuthedath, S.; Liu, W.; Markina, A.; Huang, W.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Nahid, M.M.; Nugraha, M.I.; Lin, Y.; et al. Long-range exciton diffusion in molecular non-fullerene acceptors. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiang, W.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Albrecht, S.; Hagfeldt, A.; Wang, Z. Intermediate phase engineering of halide perovskites for photovoltaics. Joule 2022, 6, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jung, M.; Ji, S.-G.; Kim, G.; Seok, S.I. Perovskite precursor solution chemistry: From fundamentals to photovoltaic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2011–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Y.; Fan, Q.; Liu, H.; Jalan, I.; Jin, Y.; Stam, J.V.; Moons, E.; Wang, E.; Lu, X.; Inganäs, O.; et al. In Situ Optical Spectroscopy Demonstrates the Effect of Solvent Additive in the Formation of All-Polymer Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 11696–11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bao, S.; Yang, H.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Z.; Cui, C.; Li, Y. Volatilizable Solid Additive-Assisted Treatment Enables Organic Solar Cells with Efficiency over 18.8% and Fill Factor Exceeding 80%. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2105301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Q.; Wang, L.-M.; Liu, S.; Guo, L.; Dong, S.; Ma, G.; Cao, Z.; Zhan, X.; Gu, X.; Zhu, T.; et al. Vertical Composition Distribution and Crystallinity Regulations Enable High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells with >17% Efficiency. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3637–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, W.; Song, L.; Magerl, D.; González, D.M.; Körstgens, V.; Philipp, M.; Moulin, J.-F.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Influence of Solvent Additive 1,8-Octanedithiol on P3HT:PCBM Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. McDowell, C.; Abdelsamie, M.; Toney, M.F.; Bazan, G.C. Solvent Additives: Key Morphology-Directing Agents for Solution-Processed Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Peet, J.; Kim, J.Y.; Coates, N.E.; Ma, W.L.; Moses, D.; Heeger, A.J.; Bazan, G.C. Efficiency enhancement in low-bandgap polymer solar cells by processing with alkane dithiols. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, J.K.; Ma, W.L.; Brabec, C.J.; Yuen, J.; Moon, J.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, K.; Bazan, G.C.; Heeger, A.J. Processing Additives for Improved Efficiency from Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3619–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, C.; Yao, J. Origin of Effects of Additive Solvent on Film-Morphology in Solution-Processed Nonfullerene Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6462–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liang, P.-W.; Liao, C.-Y.; Chueh, C.-C.; Zuo, F.; Williams, S.T.; Xin, X.-K.; Lin, J.; Jen, A.K.-Y. Additive Enhanced Crystallization of Solution-Processed Perovskite for Highly Efficient Planar-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3748–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Song, X.; Wang, W.; Sun, P.; Ma, W.; Chen, Z.-K. Additive to regulate the perovskite crystal film growth in planar heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 033901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Peng, L.; Xiea, W.; Yang, C. Study of the effect of DIO additive on charge extraction and recombination in organic–inorganic hybrid MAPbI3−xClx perovskite solar cell. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 40298–40307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsai, C.-H.; Lin, C.-M.; Kuei, C.-H. Improving the performance of perovskite solar cells by adding 1,8-diiodooctane in the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite layer. Solar Energy 2018, 176, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ghorai, A.; Mahato, S.; Singh, S.; Bose, S.; Roy, B.; Jeong, U.; Ray, S.K. Ligand-Mediated Revival of Degraded α-CsPbI3 to Stable Highly Luminescent Perovskite. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202302852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Peng, J.; Xia, C.Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, R.; Cui, L.; Clegg, J.K.; Herz, L.M.; Johnston, M.B.; Lin, Q. Crystallization of CsPbBr3 single crystals in water for X-ray detection. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Welyab, G.; Abebe, M.; Mani, D.; Thankappan, A.; Thomas, S.; Aga, F.G.; Kim, J.Y. All-Inorganic CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals Synthesized with Olive Oil and Oleylamine at Room Temperature. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gutmann, V. Solvent effects on the reactivities of organometallic compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976, 18, 225–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Belmares, M.; Blanco, M.; Goddard III, W.A.; Ross, R.B.; Caldwell, G.; Chou, S.-H.; Pham, J.; Olofson, P.M.; Thomas, C. Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameters from molecular dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1814–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Krevelen, D.W.V.; Nijenhuis, K.T. Properties of Polymers, 4th ed.; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yao, K.; Xu, Y.-X.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Yuan, J. The critical role of additives in binary halogen-free solvent systems for the general processing of highly efficient organic solar cells. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 93689–93696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Salim, T.; Wong, L.H.; Bräuer, B.; Kukreja, R.; Foo, Y.L.; Bao, Z.; Lam, Y.M. Solvent additives and their effects on blend morphologies of bulk heterojunctions. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Chen, W.; Zhu, H.; Xiong, Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, C.; Chen, R.; Han, L.; Chen, W. Solvent engineering for efficient inverted perovskite solar cells based on inorganic CsPbI2Br light absorber. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 8, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Flory, P.J. Principles of Polymer Chemistry; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1953. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kim, J.Y. Phase Diagrams of Ternary π-Conjugated Polymer Solutions for Organic Photovoltaics. Polymers 2021, 13, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kim, J.Y. Phase Diagrams of Binary Low Bandgap Conjugated Polymer Solutions and Blends. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 4317–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Awol, N.; Amente, C.; Verma, G.; Kim, J.Y. A versatile lead iodide particle synthesis and film surface analysis for optoelectronics. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 829, 154486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yan, K.; Long, M.; Zhang, T.; Wei, Z.; Chen, H.; Yang, S.; Xu, J. Hybrid Halide Perovskite Solar Cell Precursors: Colloidal Chemistry and Coordination Engineering behind Device Processing for High Efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4460–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Petrov, A.A.; Ordinartsev, A.A.; Fateev, S.A.; Goodilin, E.A.; Tarasov, A.B. Solubility of Hybrid Halide Perovskites in DMF and DMSO. Molecules 2021, 26, 7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Satta, J.; Casu, A.; Chiriu, D.; Carbonaro, C.M.; Stagi, L.; Ricci, P.C. Formation Mechanisms and Phase Stability of Solid-State Grown CsPbI3 Perovskites. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kim, J.Y.; Nagamani, S.; Liu, L.; Elghazaly, A.H.; Solin, N.; Inganäs, O. A DNA and Self-Doped Conjugated Polyelectrolyte Assembled for Organic Optoelectronics and Bioelectronics. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Patil, A.O.; Ikenoue, Y.; Basescu, N.; Colaneri, N.; Chen, J.; Wudl, F.; Heeger, A.J. Self-doped conducting polymers. Synth. Met. 1987, 20, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tauc, J. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si. Mater. Res. Bull. 1968, 3, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, L.; Sun, C.; He, T.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, J.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, M. High-performance quasi-2D perovskite light-emitting diodes: From materials to devices. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Leung, T.L.; Ahmad, I.; Syed, A.A.; Ng, A.M.C.; Popović, J.; Djurišić, A.V. Stability of 2D and quasi-2D perovskite materials and devices. Commun. Mater. 2022, 3, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sheng, X.; Li, Y.; Xia, M.; Shi, E. Quasi-2D halide perovskite crystals and their optoelectronic applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 19169–19183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C.H.; Yang, R.X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M.V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Straus, D.B.; Guo, S.; Cava, R.J. Kinetically Stable Single Crystals of Perovskite-Phase CsPbI3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11435–11439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Bhaumik, S.; Bruno, A.; Mhaisalkar, S. Broadband emission from zero-dimensional Cs4PbI6 perovskite nanocrystals. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 13431–13436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, Y.G.; Kim, T.-Y.; Oh, J.H.; Choi, K.S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, S.Y. Cesium lead iodide solar cells controlled by annealing temperature. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 6257–6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Kan, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Y. Efficient a-CsPbI3 Photovoltaics with Surface Terminated Organic Cations. Joule 2018, 2, 2065–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Yousaf, T.; Shahzad, N.; Sattar, A.; Tariq, M.A.; Hussain, N.; Khan, Z.S.; Javed, S.; Shahzad, M.I.; Pugliese, D. Performance of Cs-Doped Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Cells in Ambient Environment. Energies 2023, 16, 4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Doumon, N.Y.; Wang, G.; Qiu, X.; Minnaard, A.J.; Chiechi, R.C.; Anton, L.J. 1,8-diiodooctane acts as a photo-acid in organic solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Duan, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Tang, Q. Cluster effect of additives in precursors for inorganic perovskites solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 331, 135379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Yu, T.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, L.; Yin, L. Surface passivation engineering strategy to fully-inorganic cubic CsPbI3 perovskites for high-performance solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Cavallini, M.; Bracali, M.; Aloisi, G.; Guidelli, R. Electrochemical STM Investigation of 1,8-Octanedithiol Self-Assembled Monolayers on Ag(111) in Aqueous Solution. Langmuir 1999, 15, 3003–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of organic additives and solvents. (a) Organic additives: DIO, CN, and OTD. (b) Solvents: DMF, DMSO, and CB.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of organic additives and solvents. (a) Organic additives: DIO, CN, and OTD. (b) Solvents: DMF, DMSO, and CB.
Micromachines 14 01601 g001
Figure 2. Phase diagrams of binary additive–solvent systems: (a) additive–DMF system and (b) additive–DMSO system. Here, the additive could be DIO, CN, or ODT, which has a molar volume with oligomer level compared to typical solvents such as DMF and DMSO.
Figure 2. Phase diagrams of binary additive–solvent systems: (a) additive–DMF system and (b) additive–DMSO system. Here, the additive could be DIO, CN, or ODT, which has a molar volume with oligomer level compared to typical solvents such as DMF and DMSO.
Micromachines 14 01601 g002
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3.
Figure 3. Crystal structures of (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3.
Micromachines 14 01601 g003
Figure 4. Electronic band structures: (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 with the energy bandgap, Eg = 2.87 eV and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3 with Eg = 1.90 eV. Density of states: (c) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (d) black γ-phase CsPbI3. Here, EF stands for Fermi energy. Here, the red dot line is y = 0 for (a) and (b) and x = 0 for (c) and (d), respectively.
Figure 4. Electronic band structures: (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 with the energy bandgap, Eg = 2.87 eV and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3 with Eg = 1.90 eV. Density of states: (c) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (d) black γ-phase CsPbI3. Here, EF stands for Fermi energy. Here, the red dot line is y = 0 for (a) and (b) and x = 0 for (c) and (d), respectively.
Micromachines 14 01601 g004
Figure 5. UV-vis absorption spectra of (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3 and its derivative (e.g., Cs4PbI6 or low dimensional structure). Tauc plot for determining bandgap of (c) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (d) black γ-phase CsPbI3 and its derivative. Here, the arrows indicate a tangential line to determine the optical bandgap.
Figure 5. UV-vis absorption spectra of (a) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (b) black γ-phase CsPbI3 and its derivative (e.g., Cs4PbI6 or low dimensional structure). Tauc plot for determining bandgap of (c) yellow δ-phase CsPbI3 and (d) black γ-phase CsPbI3 and its derivative. Here, the arrows indicate a tangential line to determine the optical bandgap.
Micromachines 14 01601 g005
Figure 6. Self-doped CsPbI3 without/with organic additive: (a) PL emission spectra and (b) time-resolved PL decay spectra.
Figure 6. Self-doped CsPbI3 without/with organic additive: (a) PL emission spectra and (b) time-resolved PL decay spectra.
Micromachines 14 01601 g006
Figure 7. (a) Selected area diffraction pattern and (b) high-resolution TEM image of the self-doped CsPbI3 sample.
Figure 7. (a) Selected area diffraction pattern and (b) high-resolution TEM image of the self-doped CsPbI3 sample.
Micromachines 14 01601 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns for (a) self-doped CsPbI3 without organic additive and (b) self-doped CsPbI3 with organic additives such as DIO (brown), CN (violet), and ODT (green). Note that the blue solid line is for γ-CsPbI3 from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD-4127359) whereas the red solid line is for δ-CsPbI3 from ICSD-27979. The pink filled circles indicate the XRD peaks from the trigonal Cs4PbI6 phase [95].
Figure 8. XRD patterns for (a) self-doped CsPbI3 without organic additive and (b) self-doped CsPbI3 with organic additives such as DIO (brown), CN (violet), and ODT (green). Note that the blue solid line is for γ-CsPbI3 from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD-4127359) whereas the red solid line is for δ-CsPbI3 from ICSD-27979. The pink filled circles indicate the XRD peaks from the trigonal Cs4PbI6 phase [95].
Micromachines 14 01601 g008
Figure 9. SEM images: (a) self-doped CsPbI3, (b) self-doped CsPbI3 with DIO, (c) self-doped CsPbI3 with CN, and (d) self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT.
Figure 9. SEM images: (a) self-doped CsPbI3, (b) self-doped CsPbI3 with DIO, (c) self-doped CsPbI3 with CN, and (d) self-doped CsPbI3 with ODT.
Micromachines 14 01601 g009
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of self-doped CsPbI3 without and with organic additives, DIO, CN, and ODT.
Figure 10. FTIR spectra of self-doped CsPbI3 without and with organic additives, DIO, CN, and ODT.
Micromachines 14 01601 g010
Table 1. Group contribution to E c o h (cohesive energy) for estimating the solubility parameter (δ) [75,76]. Here, E c o h g r o u p and E c o h are cohesive energy per group and per entire molecule, respectively. M W 2 is molecular weight, ρ 2 is density, V 2 is molar volume of organic additives, b.p. is boiling point, and δ 2   ( or   δ 2 ) is solubility parameter, respectively. Here, the subscript-2 denotes additive molecule whereas subscript-1 is used for solvent in Table 2.
Table 1. Group contribution to E c o h (cohesive energy) for estimating the solubility parameter (δ) [75,76]. Here, E c o h g r o u p and E c o h are cohesive energy per group and per entire molecule, respectively. M W 2 is molecular weight, ρ 2 is density, V 2 is molar volume of organic additives, b.p. is boiling point, and δ 2   ( or   δ 2 ) is solubility parameter, respectively. Here, the subscript-2 denotes additive molecule whereas subscript-1 is used for solvent in Table 2.
AdditiveGroup E c o h g r o u p
(J/mol)
Group
Number
E c o h
(J/mol)
M W 2 (g/mol) ρ 2
(g/cm3)
V 2 (cm3/mol) b.p.
(°C)
δ 2
(MPa)1/2
δ 2
(cal/cm3)1/2
DIO-CH2-4190871,620366.020.818447.5167–16919.09.3
-I19,0502
CN-Cl12,990158,056162.621.194136.2111–11320.710.1
-CH=CH-10,2003
>C=C(H)-48601
>C=C<9606 a1
ODT-CH2-4190877,050178.360.970183.9269–27018.89.2
-S-88002
-H12,965 a2
a Estimated from the solubility parameter data in the literature [77,78].
Table 2. Properties of solvents and antisolvent. M W 1 is molecular weight, ρ 1 is density, V ^ 1 is molar volume of solvent, b.p. is boiling point, δ 1   ( or   δ 1 ) is solubility parameter [75], and DN is Gutmann’s donor number [73], respectively. Here, the subscript 1 denotes solvent molecule.
Table 2. Properties of solvents and antisolvent. M W 1 is molecular weight, ρ 1 is density, V ^ 1 is molar volume of solvent, b.p. is boiling point, δ 1   ( or   δ 1 ) is solubility parameter [75], and DN is Gutmann’s donor number [73], respectively. Here, the subscript 1 denotes solvent molecule.
Solvent M W 1
(g/mol)
ρ 1
(g/cm3)
V ^ 1 (cm3/mol) b.p.
(°C)
δ 1
(MPa)1/2
δ 1
(cal/cm3)1/2
DN
(kcal/mol)
DMF70.090.94873.915324.812.126.6
DMSO78.131.10071.018929.7 14.529.8
CB112.561.110101.413219.59.53.3
Table 3. Flory–Huggins interaction parameter ( χ 12 ) and molar volume ratio ( r 2 = V 2 / V ^ 1 ) when r 1 = 1 for the solvent such as DMF or DMSO.
Table 3. Flory–Huggins interaction parameter ( χ 12 ) and molar volume ratio ( r 2 = V 2 / V ^ 1 ) when r 1 = 1 for the solvent such as DMF or DMSO.
SystemDIO:DMFCN:DMFODT:DMFDIO:DMSOCN:DMSOODT:DMSO
χ 12 291.6/T148.8/T312.8/T966.2/T691.8/T1003.7/T
r 2 * 6.11.82.56.31.92.5
* Note that r 2 10 indicates that the component 2 can be treated as a model oligomer.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kebede, T.; Abebe, M.; Mani, D.; Paduvilan, J.K.; Thottathi, L.; Thankappan, A.; Thomas, S.; Kamangar, S.; Shaik, A.S.; Badruddin, I.A.; et al. Phase Behavior and Role of Organic Additives for Self-Doped CsPbI3 Perovskite Semiconductor Thin Films. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081601

AMA Style

Kebede T, Abebe M, Mani D, Paduvilan JK, Thottathi L, Thankappan A, Thomas S, Kamangar S, Shaik AS, Badruddin IA, et al. Phase Behavior and Role of Organic Additives for Self-Doped CsPbI3 Perovskite Semiconductor Thin Films. Micromachines. 2023; 14(8):1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kebede, Tamiru, Mulualem Abebe, Dhakshnamoorthy Mani, Jibin Keloth Paduvilan, Lishin Thottathi, Aparna Thankappan, Sabu Thomas, Sarfaraz Kamangar, Abdul Saddique Shaik, Irfan Anjum Badruddin, and et al. 2023. "Phase Behavior and Role of Organic Additives for Self-Doped CsPbI3 Perovskite Semiconductor Thin Films" Micromachines 14, no. 8: 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081601

APA Style

Kebede, T., Abebe, M., Mani, D., Paduvilan, J. K., Thottathi, L., Thankappan, A., Thomas, S., Kamangar, S., Shaik, A. S., Badruddin, I. A., Aga, F. G., & Kim, J. Y. (2023). Phase Behavior and Role of Organic Additives for Self-Doped CsPbI3 Perovskite Semiconductor Thin Films. Micromachines, 14(8), 1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14081601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop