Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Defenses: A Context-Specific Vulnerability of Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Depletions of Subcutaneous Fat Mass and Skeletal Muscle Mass Predict Worse Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection and Prognostic Relevance of Circulating and Disseminated Tumour Cell in Dogs with Metastatic Mammary Carcinoma: A Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/cancers11081207
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tumor Cell Dormancy: Threat or Opportunity in the Fight against Cancer

by
Rana Jahanban-Esfahlan
1,2,3,†,
Khaled Seidi
4,†,
Masoud H. Manjili
5,
Ali Jahanban-Esfahlan
6,
Tahereh Javaheri
7,*,‡ and
Peyman Zare
8,*
1
Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 9841, Iran
2
Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 9841, Iran
3
Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 9841, Iran
4
Biotechnology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 9841, Iran
5
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, VCU School of Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
6
Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 9841, Iran
7
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research, 1090 Vienna, Austria
8
Faculty of Medicine, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
‡
The author is no longer in this institution.
Cancers 2019, 11(8), 1207; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081207
Submission received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 11 August 2019 / Accepted: 13 August 2019 / Published: 19 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tumor dormancy, a clinically undetectable state of cancer, makes a major contribution to the development of multidrug resistance (MDR), minimum residual disease (MRD), tumor outgrowth, cancer relapse, and metastasis. Despite its high incidence, the whole picture of dormancy-regulated molecular programs is far from clear. That is, it is unknown when and which dormant cells will resume proliferation causing late relapse, and which will remain asymptomatic and harmless to their hosts. Thus, identification of dormancy-related culprits and understanding their roles can help predict cancer prognosis and may increase the probability of timely therapeutic intervention for the desired outcome. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the dormancy-dictated molecular mechanisms, including angiogenic switch, immune escape, cancer stem cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, metabolic reprogramming, miRNAs, epigenetic modifications, and stress-induced p38 signaling pathways. Further, we analyze the possibility of leveraging these dormancy-related molecular cues to outmaneuver cancer and discuss the implications of such approaches in cancer treatment.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms adopt different mechanisms to survive under hostile conditions. They undergo drastic changes in cellular physiology to shape the surrounding microenvironment to best fit their requirements [1]. In response to a stressor such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or O2/nutrient scarcity, stressed tumor cells that survive apoptosis become dormant. After cessation of the therapy, the dormant cells may repopulate, resulting in tumor recurrence and development of chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells [2,3].
Dormant cells can be detected as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the bloodstream or disseminated cells (DTCs) in secondary sites such as bone marrow (BM). Once metastatic cells find a new home to settle, they may undergo different fates: they either die, remain silent (restrictive soil), or grow with an even more aggressive and lethal behavior than before (permissive soil). The implication of tumor cell dormancy is very well established in the development of multidrug resistance (MDR), minimum residual disease (MRD), tumor outgrowth, and metastatic relapse, leading to cancer treatment failure [4,5,6].
In the context of clinical settings, clinical dormancy is defined as the pre- or post-treatment time point where residual cancer cells are clinically undetectable. Generally, cancer dormancy can be categorized as cellular dormancy or tumor mass dormancy [7]. Cellular dormancy is defined as transient G0-G1 growth arrest in a certain fraction of cancer cells (dormant cells); accordingly, cancer progression occurs when a single dormant malignant cell gains the ability to re-enter the cell cycle. In tumor mass dormancy a stagnation of total tumor growth due to the equilibrium of proliferation and apoptosis is governed by an angiogenic switch or immune escape (two prevailing mechanisms) that eventually shifts the balance in favor of cancer progression [8]. Accordingly, current in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo (organs-on-a-chip) experimental models of cancer dormancy can mimic cellular and tumor mass dormancy (angiogenic and immunologic dormancy), each reflecting distinct growth kinetics [9]. These models were somewhat successful in recapitulating dormancy mechanism of tumors, as they lead to the discovery of cellular dormancy factors/mechanisms including extracellular matrix (ECM) [10], metabolic [11,12], epigenetic [13,14], stemness [15,16], non-coding RNAs [17], and p38 stress-induced signaling pathway [18,19,20], as we intend to discuss in detail in this review (Table 1). However, these models fail to address the full picture of clinically observed dormancy-related cellular processes, such that, the function of angiogenic dormancy in metastatic dormancy is unclear [21]. Also, the paradox role of pro- and anti-proliferative action of the immune system is shown in tumor evolution [22]. Also, inherent difficulties in detecting and characterizing micrometastatic lesions/individual cells in the patient is another hurdle to assess the relative contribution of various mechanisms of dormancy in the clinical setting [23]. However, the new emerging methodologies, namely microfluidics based on analyzing microliters of serum samples may enable detection of single cells, as wells as DTCs and may aid to capture dormancy dynamics at a single-cell resolution (reviewed in [24,25,26,27]). A full discussion of dormancy-related experimental models is recently reviewed [28,29,30]. The focus of the current paper, however, is to employ the data extracted from different dormancy models in the preclinical settings to highlight the stealth mechanisms dictating cancer cell dormancy. Subsequently, we analyze the possibility of leveraging dormancy related molecular cues to outmaneuver cancer. Finally, the implication of each approach in cancer treatment and prognosis is discussed.

2. Angiogenic Switch

As a foremost contributing factor to tumor dormancy is the incompetence of proliferating tumors to acquire the angiogenic potential to induce the formation of new blood vessels [97]. In the same way, the ability to drive tumor angiogenesis process will promote the escape from latency and initiate tumor outgrowth. This point of cancer progression is recognized as an angiogenic switch, the induction of which is under the control of intricate biological processes comprising the cancer cells, BM-derived endothelial precursors, and tumor associated-stromal microenvironment [98,99].
Angiogenesis switch, or in a better word, angiogenic failure is a key piece of the cancer cell dormancy puzzle. The role of angiogenic dormancy has been highlighted by the experimental as well as clinical observations that anti-angiogenic therapies or angiogenic therapies could induce tumor dormancy or rescue dormant cells, respectively (Table 1). As such, angiogenic factors display a reduced expression in dormant cells; meanwhile, the high transcription level of angiogenesis inhibitors such as angiostatin, endostatin, and thrombospondin-1 is associated with the tumor dormancy.
Concerning the role of the angiogenic switch in cancer dormancy, two therapeutic approaches follow: in the first approach, long-term dormancy can be induced using anti-angiogenic therapy as validated in different angiogenic models of dormancy in vivo [100]. For example, cancer patients may benefit from bioactive angiostatin gene therapy; however, transgene delivery may necessitate repetitive drug administration to assure persistent latency state of primary tumors and control metastatic expansion, that is not clinically feasible because of off-target effects and also low expression level of transgene as shown in a B16F10 melanoma mouse model [31]. Also, eradication of primary tumors which result in inducing dormant tumor cells is evidenced by the high expression level of angiogenic inhibitor thrombospondin-1 in human melanoma xenografts (D-12, R-18, and U-25). In contrast to wild-type tumors with no thrombospondin-1 expression, a tumor-suppressive index was demonstrated only in mice bearing D-12, U-25, or thrombospondin-1 overexpressing R-18 tumors, as validated by melanoma angiogenesis, lung colonization, and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis [32]. These results suggest a combination of sustained anti-angiogenic therapy besides local treatment for melanoma therapy. Impaired tumor angiogenesis also drives prolonged dormancy of human liposarcoma. This type of tumor with no angiogenic activity produce moderately high amount of the anti-angiogenesis agents TIMP-1 and thrombospondin-1, proposing that the nonangiogenic, microscopic, dormant stage of melanoma might be susceptible to anti-angiogenic treatment years prior to manifestation of malignant disease, or macroscopically detection of anatomical site of a given tumor, by current approaches [101]. Notably, metastatic dormancy can be realized once the proliferation of tumor cell is well-balanced with an equal ratio of tumor cell apoptosis, indicating that anti-angiogenic treatment regulates metastatic outgrowth through increasing of cancer cell death [21].
Besides, the dormancy process can be reversed when dormant cells are fed with adequate angiogenic factors. The reversibility of dormancy envisages the second approach based on awakening and switching silent cells into proliferative and yet susceptible cancer cells to further face the anti-angiogenic therapy. In this line, studies on engineered organotypic microvascular niches established that while a Thrombospondin-1 secretion from endothelial cells induces maintained BCC dormancy, bioactive Periostin and TGF-β1 function as tumor-promoting factors in sprouting neovasculature which further sparks micrometastatic outgrowth [35]. A detailed role of TGF-β related cellular dormancy is recently reviewed in [102]. Moreover, the shift of resting tumors was shown to be correlated with the downregulation of Thrombospondin and a reduced response to Angiostatin in angiogenic tumors. The transformation of quiescent tumors to highly proliferating tumors was also associated with the activation and regulation of molecular cues connected to tumor dormancy in different in vivo cancer models [36]. Also, engineered WM1341B cells constitutively overexpressing the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular permeability factor (VPF) isoform is shown to terminate long-term melanoma dormancy and can induce overt and progressively growing tumors. These effects were largely counteracted by neutralizing VEGF activity in mice [33].

3. Cancer Immune-Mediated Dormancy

The tumor-host interactions are progressively known as crucial constituents of cancer growth or inhibition. Particularly, infiltrating immune cells are critical features of the tumor microenvironment [103]. Cancer cells are encircled by stromal cells, including macrophages, fibroblasts, mast cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, which communicate through an intricate system of intercellular signaling pathways, mediated by cytokines, adhesion molecules, and the receptor-ligand network [42]. The immune system can confine the metastatic spread of cancer cells, encouraging their long-lasting latency [104]. Nonetheless, the perturbation of the equilibration in favor of immune escape will result in tumor outgrowth rather than the destruction of cancer cells, otherwise, immune surveillance could maintain angiogenic control and impede cancer cell growth (Figure 1) [105]. In this context, results from a valuable study clearly indicated the immune-mediated dormancy in a nontransgenic mouse model, where injection of MHC1-negative GR9-B11 mouse fibrosarcoma clone results in no apparent spontaneous metastases within 24 months after tumor cell injection receiving no antitumor treatment. Of note, immunodepletion of T lymphocytes or asialo GM1-positive cells results in relieving the restraint dormant cells into disseminated MHC-1 positive metastatic cells in mice lungs [106]. Thus, immune-mediated cancer dormancy at least can be regulated by T lymphocytes, as they can keep spontaneous metastases in permanent dormancy. Recently, CD8+ T cells are shown to play a key role in maintaining tumor dormancy, as tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells (epidermal CD69+ CD103+ TRM cells) are implicated in the melanoma-immune equilibrium and control the active disease as demonstrated in skin-implanted melanoma cancer cells in mice model [107]. Paradoxically, while expression of B7-H1 on the surface of tumor cells impairs dormant cancer cell-killing potential of T-cells, expression of same surface receptors by natural killer (NK) cells (induced by CXCL10) can activate them to prompt a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response resulting in destruction of otherwise CTL-killing resistant dormant tumor cells in vitro and in vivo [108].
Meanwhile, an association of human Tregs, neutrophils and inflammatory mediators such as interferon-gamma (IFNγ) are rather context-dependent [109]. With regards to the role of other interferons, a recent study demonstrated the role of IFN-β-induced immunological dormancy reflected in sustained activation of the IRF7/IFN-β/IFNAR axis in chemo-resistant (high dose doxorubicin and methotrexate) ER-negative 4T1 breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [110]. Meanwhile, one study to recapitulate sustained inflammation in lungs as demonstrated in smoker individuals revealed that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) proteases (elastase and MMP9) produced during inflammation can degrade laminin which further induces proliferation of dormant cells through activating αvβ3 integrin signaling, resulting in aggressive metastatic tumors in mice [111]. Immunotherapeutics that target disseminated cancer dormancy may aid to control or eliminate cancer state. In this view, treatment modalities that induce or amplify the CTL immune response or abrogate CTL immunosuppression mediated by cancer cells might be beneficial to confine or eradicate metastatic cells [112].
Dormancy state induced by the elimination of primary tumor can be avoided by a “recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy”, dosing days in advance to tumor resection and lasting throughout the whole treatment course, that is a highly speculative therapy [113]. Alternatively, immune-stimulated dormancy pathway can be tuned to reverse dormancy and favor dormant cell eradication. For instance, blocking IDO-kynurenine-AhR metabolic circuitry abolishes immunologic latency mediated by IFN-γ in tumor-repopulating cells (TRCs). Hypothetically, the IFN-γ-STAT1 signaling induces apoptosis in proliferating tumor cells; however, TRCs-induced overexpression of IDO1 and AhR, shifts IFN-γ action and give rise to IDO1/AhR-induced p27 activation and inhibition of STAT1 signaling. Further, these events translate into the inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis and thus switching to dormancy program. Blockade of IDO/AhR metabolic circuitry not only nullifies IFN-γ-mediated latency but also promotes amplified tumor cell growth arrest by IFN-γ-dependent killing of TRCs in vitro and in vivo [48]. As noted before, dormant tumor cells may hinder CTL-mediated tumor lysis via overexpressing B7-H1 and B7.1 [42]. They also counteract apoptosis by paracrine secretion of cytokines (e.g., IL-3) and simultaneous inactivation of SOCS1, the expression of which negatively controls JAK/STAT signaling [114]. In this context, using BCR/ABL DA1-3b mouse model of acute myelogenous leukemia as a model of sustained tumor immunological dormancy, results indicated that demethylation or gene transfer restored the expression of SOCS1, which further rendered dormant cells sensitive to apoptosis and abrogated resistance to CTL-induced tumor cell destruction. Moreover, the cross-resistance to apoptosis emanating from dormant tumor cell-induced overproduction of Interleukin 3 (IL-3) was also upturned using anti-IL-3 antibody [47].
Alternatively, “recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy” of overt cancer may retain all undetectable DTCs quiescent providing that the treatment is continued as a plan to control cancer [113]. Thus, preventing metastatic expansion would be more feasible than eliminating an established metastasis [113]. As such, tumor-cell immunization prompts tumor cell latency in mice bearing B-cell aggressive leukemia/lymphoma (BCL1). In this line, while an anti-idiotypic immunity was insufficient to eliminate BCL1 cells, it was capable of suppressing growth activating signals, which further promoted cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and persistent BCL1 dormancy in mice [115]. Also, immunity to BCL1, which was achieved by numerous inoculations of irradiated carcinoma cells, precludes leukemia growth in primary and adoptive transfer recipients even with the lifelong perseverance of residual cancer cells [116].
From a different angle, increasing inflammation instigates tumor recurrence, thus interventions that inhibit inflammatory signaling could inhibit cancer relapse [5]. In this sense, a literature search was reported that inflammation and wound healing process following surgery is enough to induce distant cancer outgrowth in cancerous patients [117], especially when the tumor outgrowth was attenuated by the adaptive immune system [118]. Accordingly, anti-inflammatory medications can benefit cancer patients undergoing surgery by avoiding the awakening of latent micrometastatic cells. Furthermore, it was shown that the lipopolysaccharide treatment-induced localized inflammation in the lungs of mice sends a wake-up signal to metastatic latency in the lung parenchyma through Zeb1 expression, a key regulator of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Likewise, Zeb1-orchestrated stimulation of EMT program by itself is sufficient to provoke metastatic spread by triggering the stable entry of tumor cells into a state of metastasis-initiating cells [45]. Accordingly, inhibition of Zeb1, LIFR: STAT3 signaling [52] as well as blocking the actions of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and IL-1β cytokines could confer dormancy and thus eliminate cancer outgrowth [46].

4. Metabolic Reprogramming

Impaired vascular system observed in solid tumors encourages establishing oxygen and nutrients deprived microenvironments that harbor metabolically stressed slow-growing cells. Tumor cells under hypoxia and nutrient deprivation become dormant by reducing or shifting their metabolic needs. A second deprivation assault would shut down the possible energy compensatory options for tumor cells and succumb them to apoptotic death. Such that, small molecule VLX600 displays superior cytotoxic action in nutrient-starved environments in vitro and in vivo and is preferentially active against quiescent cells as validated in HCT116 colon cancer spheroids. The anti-tumor potential is correlated with dampened mitochondrial respiration, culminating in bioenergetic catastrophe and tumor cell apoptosis [11]. Likewise, another study has shown the superior performance of FF-10502, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite over gemcitabine on pancreatic dormant cells in vitro and in vivo, by inducing dormant cell injury in chemotherapy-resistant cells through blocking DNA polymerase β activity and DNA repair [119]. Further, in vivo and organoid cultures to recapitulate metabolic dormancy models revealed the involvement of metabolic shifts in breast cancer relapse. That, blockade of either transportation of fatty acid into mitochondria or synthesis of cellular fatty acid lessens DNA damages and cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, connecting these hallmarks to lipid metabolism. Tumor relapse can be prevented by direct disruption of these features, either by mitigating the expansion of the residual breast cell population or scavenging ROS [50]. These metabolic changes were also reflected in transcriptomics and histological signatures of residual cancer cells from neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer patients.
An additional strategy would be reinforcing a quiescence-like metabolic state to block tumor evasion. In this regard, a novel metabolic tumor suppressor, LACTB is shown to reduce mitochondrial phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (PISD) protein abundance and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)/lysophosphatidylethanolamines (LPE) production, resulting in a mitochondrial state consisted of reduced proliferation, increased epithelial phenotype, and a decrease in mesenchymal and cancer stem cell markers, which associated with tumor regression and inhibition of tumor formation, as demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo breast cancer models in mice and humans. Conversely, LACTB silencing in non-tumorigenic breast cell lines cooperated with oncogenic drivers (HRASG12V and MYCT58A) supporting tumor formation in xenotransplants [49]. Notably, results from a recent study showed the role of autophagy as an important regulator of metabolic tumor cell dormancy. That, the lack of autophagy, which is exploited as an important compensatory mechanism by tumor cells to provide their energy requirements, associates with an early breast cancer recurrence and escape from dormancy as demonstrated in neu-overexpressing mouse mammary carcinoma (MMC) [120].

5. ECM Remodeling

The likely involvement of communications between ECM and tumor cells in metastatic niches determine tumor latency against the metastatic outbreak. Generally, the inability of cancer cells to appropriately adhere to the ECM may potentiate their entry into a dormancy state [121]. Inhibition of one of the components of fibronectin/uPAR/integrin/ERK/MLCK signaling axis as well as suppressing PI3K/Akt pathway is sufficient to prevent/treat metastatic tumor outgrowth, meanwhile promotes dormancy state through favoring the p38 MAPK signaling [122]. As proof of concept, the switch from dormancy to the proliferating state of D2A1 cells was shown to rely on the production of Fibronectin and β1 Integrin signaling, the formation of filamentous actin (F-actin) stress fiber and cytoskeletal reorganization. In this report, integrin β1-dependent phosphorylation of myosin light chain (MLC) by MLC kinase (MLCK) was a prerequisite for F-actin stress fiber formation and exponentially growing of cancer cells. Further, blockade of β1 integrin or MLCK favored dormancy state and MLCK inhibition significantly reduced metastatic expansion in vivo [56]. Similarly, deposition of type I collagen (Col-I) to induce fibrosis is shown to induce the transition of dormant D2.0R cells to proliferating cells by β1 Integrin-mediated Src and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation, causing extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent phosphorylation of MLC by MLCK and formation of actin stress fiber. Blockade of β1-integrin, MLCK, ERK, Src counteracted Col-I-mediated induction of this signaling cascade, cytoskeletal rearrangement, and proliferating state in the faithfully stimulated metastatic microenvironment in vivo [57]. Recently, targeting the perivascular niche with integrin inhibitors are exploited for chemosensitization of breast cancer cells and the prevention of bone metastasis in mice [123]. Likewise, Src knockdown or pharmacological blocking of SFK signaling was shown to promote p27 localization to the nucleus and thwarts transition of quiescent breast cancer cells (BCCs) into the proliferative and metastatic outbreak; still, SFK inhibition was not enough to eradicate residual cells. ERK1/2 activation was also needed for proliferation and awaking dormant cell. The combined therapy of cells undergoing the transition from dormancy to proliferating state with the MEK1/2 inhibitor (AZD6244) and Src inhibitor (AZD0530) potentiated apoptotic death in a large population of the latent cells and postponed the development of the disseminated disease, none of these was achieved with single-agent therapy. These results were obtained using the fibrosis-induced dormant-to-proliferative switch in vitro, in vivo and also ex vivo lung metastasis assay [59]. Meanwhile, EGFR signaling via activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras/Raf/ERK axis is another contribution to tumor proliferation [124]. Conversely, TGFβ signaling represents a therapeutic opportunity to activate dormancy (Table 1, Figure 2) [67].
In the context of ECM modulation, an additional therapeutic approach can be envisioned by preventing cancer cell dormancy. For example, a valuable study reported that proliferating and dormant BCCs home in distinct areas within BM niche, with dormant BCCs, mainly occupy perisinusoidal vascular regions that are rich in stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and E-selectin. SDF-1 and E-selectin coordinate opposing functions in BCC, where the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis facilitates adherence of BCCs to the vascular niche, and E-selectin permits BCC entrance into the BM where they remain dormant. Thus, a combined therapy involving CXCR4/E-selectin inhibition will push cells out of their protective niches and aid trapping of the cells in the vasculature, where they could be destroyed with chemotherapy, thus provide an opportunity to control recurrent disease [68]. These observations were monitored by real-time in vivo microscopy of BM in a breast cancer xenograft model.

6. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)

DTCs or surviving tumor cells during therapy course may or may not be stem cells, in either case, however, stemness is inherent to dormancy phenotype [125]. Cumulative evidence suggests that CSCs are indeed metastasis-initiating cells, or metastatic cells acquire CSC-like phenotype upon infiltration into target organs [16,126]. Tumor cell entrance into and out of dormancy is regulated by contextual cues and intrinsic programs, like those that control the self-renewal ability of mature stem cells [125]. Furthermore, a specialized ECM niche nurse reactivation-undergoing metastatic cells, by supporting positive cues, such as Notch and Wnt, and attenuating negative cues, such as BMP [127]. Adopting a dormant state, CSCs not only can evade therapeutic killing, but the likely reversibility of this situation also poses the real threat, which can potentiate deadly relapse or recurrence decades later [128]. Notably, CSCs can adjust the expression of different surface markers which help them to colonize their desired target organs, in particular, the bone [129]. For instance, expression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 (SDF-1 receptor) by BCCs facilitates bone metastasis where osteoblasts express high levels of SDF-1 [130]. Moreover, the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis not only derives EMT for bone metastasis, but it also promotes breast cancer cell stemness, plasticity and maintenance of CSC-like properties in vivo [68]. Additional CSC-related mechanisms related to cancer cell dormancy are listed in Table 1.

7. Epigenetic Modification

As another key regulator of tumor dormancy, epigenetic modifications are involved in the epithelial to mesenchyme transition (EMT) which are associated with CSC phenotype and emergence of drug resistance, tumor dissemination, and a high risk of disease relapse. Identifying genes that encode these reversible alterations is an appealing therapeutic plan to combat metastatic disease by inducing differentiation of the mesenchymal cell into an epithelial phenotype [80].
In this respect, epigenetic upregulation of orphan nuclear receptor NR2F1 is detected in DTCs from the breast [131], and prostate cancer patients harboring lifelong dormant disease and in experimental latency models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The exploitation of these epigenetic dormancy-recapitulating models revealed that NR2F1-induced dormancy depends on RARβ, SOX9 and CDK inhibitors. Also, NR2F1 induces pluripotency gene NANOG, and global chromatin repression, favoring dormancy of DTCs in the BM [82].
Likewise, polycomb-like proteins 1-3 (PCL1-3) are substoichiometric modules of the polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2) that are indispensable for complex association with chromatin. Their functional redundancy is due to their opposing roles in the positive and negative regulation of cellular proliferation. Such that, in quiescent cells, expression of PCL1, a p53 target gene is predominant, while proliferating cells express E2F-regulated genes PCL2 and PCL3. Ectopic expression of any PCL protein employs PRC2 to suppress the INK4A gene; nevertheless, only PCL2 and PCL3 render an INK4A-evolved proliferative benefit. Of note, PCL1 confers a PRC2 function which acts independent of chromatin, possessing anti-proliferating effect and induce cellular dormancy through binding to and stabilizing p53 [81]. These results were attained using purified PCL expressing cell populations from the mouse hematopoietic system by flow cytometry.
Also, in vivo genome-wide short hairpin RNA screening has revealed a novel epigenetic-related mechanism involved in bone metastatic latency of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Clinical studies were reported that low levels of mitogen-and stress-activated kinase 1 (MSK1) expression links with early relapse in ER+ breast cancer patients. In this study, reduced MSK1 impaired the differentiation of breast cancer cells, and increased their bone homing and growth capacities. From a molecular perspective, MSK1 downregulation induces chromatin remodeling and decreases differentiation traits by modulating promoter chromatin status of genes encoding GATA3 and FOXA1 transcription factors and accelerates bone colonization by cells in distant micrometastatic sites [83]. Results from a recent preclinical study underpinned the role of epigenetic dormancy in patients receiving neoadjuvant letrozole treatment. Acquired resistance to estrogen depletion therapy with aromatase inhibitors was attributed to the dormancy highlighted with a global loss of DNA methylation under extended treatment [132]. Thus, epigenetic alteration and “dormancy phenotype” rather than “acquired resistance” can originate from therapy and that epigenetic markers targeting can be promising for the treatment of resistant hormone-depleted tumors.

8. Noncoding RNAs (miRNAs)

While the critical role of numerous microRNAs in tumorigenesis is well documented [133], the implication of dormancy miRNAs (Dmirs) is just recently illuminated [134]. For example, mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes comprising different miRNA contents, such as miR-222/223, are shown to induce cycling dormancy and early BC quiescent in BM and give rise to drug resistance. Further, administration of MSC-loaded antagomiR-222/223 sensitized BC cells to carboplatin-based therapy and increased survival of the mouse as the model for studying miRNA-regulated breast cancer dormancy [84]. Also, a recent study showed that metastatic outgrowth of the claudin-low mammary tumor cell line, RJ423 can be avoided by re-expression of the miR-200b/200a/429 cluster which promotes epithelial phenotype and induces tumor dormancy [87].
Moreover, a study on experimental models of fast-growing and dormant human osteosarcoma identified three dormancy-associated DmiRs regulating osteosarcoma latency: miR-200c, miR-34a, and miR-93. Accordingly, the expression of these microRNAs is lost upon the shift from avascular dormant into angiogenic fast-growing tumor state. Introduction of these miRNAs by dPG-NH2 polyplexes into MG-63 and Saos-2 cells dampened expression levels of their target genes, including hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), MET proto-oncogene, and moesin, vital to tumor migration and angiogenesis process. Furthermore, therapy with dPG-NH2 containing each of these microRNAs considerably extended the latency state of fast-growing osteosarcomas in mice [85].
Loss of DmiRs expression is also verified in human dormant liposarcoma, breast carcinoma, osteosarcoma, and glioblastoma tumors. In this report, transcriptional reprogramming of tumors via over-expression of DmiR-190, 588, or 580 reduced expressions of pro-angiogenic factors bFGF, TIMP-3, and TGFα while upregulated anti-angiogenic and dormancy stimulating factors angiomotin and EphA5 [135]. In all dormant tumors analyzed, overexpression of miR-190 was predominant where upregulation of this Dmir encouraged long-term dormancy of otherwise proliferative osteosarcomas and glioblastomas [17].

9. Stress-Induced p38 Signaling

Stress-induced activation of p38 signaling is one of the critical pathways related to tumor dormancy, which regulates a transcriptional network of 46 core genes that includes 16 transcription factors (TFs) [91]. p38 MAPK signaling coordinates the induction of growth arrest and drug-resistance in different models of cancer cell dormancy [136]. Imbalances in the activity ratio of ERK to p38 signaling is fundamental to decide the outcome of dormancy vs. tumorigenicity of different experimentally established cancer models [89].
Stress-dependent p38 activation induces dormancy by adopting a pro-survival mechanism via enhanced activation of the PERK and up-regulating the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone BiP, conferring dormant cells resistant to drug toxicity. Moreover, up-regulation of BiP suppresses activation of Bax. Thus, p38 signaling via PERK activation and BiP up-regulation secures dormant human squamous carcinoma cells (HEp3) from stress insults, such as chemotherapy in vivo [90]. Besides, the computational analysis showed that p38 activation induces the transcription of the TFs BHLHB3 and p53, while blocks FoxM1 and c-Jun expression. Also, p38-mediated activation of p53 requires down-regulation of c-Jun [91].
ATF6α as another p38-controlled transcription factor is crucial to the survival of the dormancy state. That ATF6α is vital for dormant cells adaptation to nutritional stress, chemotherapy, and, most importantly, the in vivo microenvironment. Accordingly, in dormant cancer cells, MKK6 and p38α/β control nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of ATF6α. Downstream, ATF6α promotes survival via Akt-independent activation of mTOR signaling and up-regulation of Rheb. Thus, targeting the survival signaling axis ATF6α-Rheb-mTOR in dormant carcinoma cells may help to remove residual disease during dormancy periods [92].
As discussed before, dormant cells and active cells occupy different soils to settle in. As non-proliferative DTCs reside in the BM while metastatic growth occurs in other organs such as the lung. Accordingly, BM niche in patients serves as a metastasis “restrictive soil” by coding dormancy activating clues in DTCs. In this view, in an in vivo HNSCC carcinoma model, specific and strong TGF-β2 signaling in the BM triggered the MAPK p38α/β and resulted in low ERK/p38 signaling ratio. This favored dormancy of malignant DTCs via induction of DEC2/SHARP1 and p27, and CDK4 downregulation. Also, TGF-β2-induced latency nodes to activate SMAD1/5, TGF-β receptor-I (TGF-β-RI) and TGF-β-RIII to induce p27. In lungs, a metastasis “permissive soil” with low TGF-β2 levels, DTC latency state was transitory and continued by metastatic expansion. Importantly, systemic inhibiting of p38α/β or TGF-β-RI activities awaked dormant DTCs, and fueled multi-organ metastasis. This work reveals a “seed and soil” mechanism whereby p38α/β regulates TGF-β2 and TGF-β-RIII signaling to determine the fate of DTC dormancy and delineates permissive (lung) and restrictive (BM) microenvironments for HNSCC metastasis [93].

10. Conclusions and Clinical Implications

Tumor dormancy is commonly regarded as the most threatening aspect of cancer, leading to the emergence of resistance in a short time and advent of lethal metastatic outbreaks after a long latency period lasting from months to years. Now that we begin to realize dormancy tactics, several therapeutic approaches stick out to outsmart cancer. As illustrated in Figure 3, these schemes include: (i) prolonging dormant state; (ii) eradication of dormant cells; (iii) reawakening/mobilization of dormant cells and (iv) avoiding dormancy state.
Prolonging dormant state is based upon the observation that immunotherapeutic targeting of advanced-stage cancers has extended the survival of cancer patients, yet its curative efficacy is limited due to tumor immunoediting. On the other hand, human vaccines have been able to eradicate and control many infectious diseases. The success has resulted from the administration of vaccines in prophylactic settings or during latency periods to protect an individual during future exposure to the disease rather than curing an established disease. Therefore, administration of immunotherapy at the right time is the key to success. Immunotherapeutic targeting of tumor dormancy could be more promising than targeting of advanced-stage disease to achieve a cure for cancer. Besides immunotherapy, identification of Dmirs advocates novel tools to inverse the malignant aggressive phenotype into a microscopic dormant state and may deliver encouraging targets for timely detection or prevention of cancer. Eradication of dormant cells without their awakening is the second tactic in which tricks of dormancy are leveraged against dormant cells. For example, their restrict dependence on survival pathway or altered energy metabolism could be their Achilles heel to interfere with cancer evolution and relapse. Additionally, dormant and resistant cells could be awakened by external stimuli such as growth factors and angiogenic cues, turning them into proliferative yet therapy-sensitive tumors.
Another alternative yet practical strategy would be pushing DTCs out of their protective niche (e.g., anti-CXCR4) and into a less supportive environment, where they can be targeted and eradicated by anti-cancer drugs. As the final approach is avoiding dormancy in the first place by inhibiting pathways leading to the acquisition of dormancy phenotype. However, due to the nature of some cancer cells and their escape from primary tumors at early stages before detection (they are as little as 5 mm in size), it is nearly impossible to prevent dormancy in all instances. Although most of our understanding arises from the preclinical studies, and implementation of the above-mentioned dormancy-based anti-cancer approaches remain to be weighted in the human cancer biology systems, they are reports for identifying and targeting dormant cancer cells in the clinical settings. To this, using disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) as “keyword” to search in clinicaltrials.gov, they were several clinical trials targeting DTCs in breast and prostate cancer patients. All of these trials were attempted to reduce the reservoir of DTCs in the BM to reduce cancer relapse and increase metastasis-free survival in patients. A detailed description of these trials can be found in Table 2.
Even if we can control cancer dormancy, not all cancer patients will ultimately benefit from this strategy. That is, even the clinically undetectable primary tumor could cause death in a portion of patients along with highly aggressive and metastatic tumors in the rest of patients. Although a considerable portion of disseminated dormant cells success to colonize, outgrow and become resistant; however, there is no strong evidence confirming that every single tumor cell that escape primary tumor and colonize in distant sites become resistant.
Though the discovery of cancer cell-derived by-products such as CTCs, cell-free DNA, exosomes, and apoptotic bodies in the blood circulation and body fluids has opened the door for timely detection and non-invasive monitoring of anti-cancer therapy outcomes, given their rarity, detection of minimal residual disease in the patients is difficult, therefore, tactics to target this population of apparently asleep cells is still in its infancy. Killing may look easier in principal, but not for cancer cells; they pretend to be sleep to pretend innocence but in fact, they are just waiting for the right moment (suitable conditions, e.g., clearance of toxic chemotherapeutics) to strike back. In conclusion, as dormancy is not responsible for all metastatic deaths, targeting dormancy in such cases would be useless. Furthermore, targeting the dormant cells by induction of dormant-to-proliferative switches involves the risk of inducing metastatic progression, while drugs that target DTCs or CSCs might affect normal stem cells. At the end of the day, it is the depth of our knowledge regarding tumor dormancy schemes that will determine the fate of our fight against cancer.

Funding

The APC for this research was funded by Peyman Zare. Faculty of Medicine, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Siriporn Keeratichamroen and Martha Glenn for kind scientific editing and fruitful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; de la Guardia, M.; Ahmadi, D.; Yousefi, B. Modulating tumor hypoxia by nanomedicine for effective cancer therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 233, 2019–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Udagawa, T. Tumor dormancy of primary and secondary cancers. Apmis: Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 2008, 116, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ya-Fei, D.; Juan-Juan, X. Tumor Cell Dormancy: How It Performs in Drug Resistance and Relapse. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 45, 460–470. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hedley, B.D.; Chambers, A.F. Tumor dormancy and metastasis. Adv. Cancer Res. 2009, 102, 67–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Manjili, M.H. Tumor dormancy and relapse: From a natural byproduct of evolution to a disease state. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 2564–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paez, D.; Labonte, M.J.; Bohanes, P.; Zhang, W.; Benhanim, L.; Ning, Y.; Wakatsuki, T.; Loupakis, F.; Lenz, H.J. Cancer dormancy: A model of early dissemination and late cancer recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Khoon, M.C.S. Experimental models of bone metastasis: Opportunities for the study of cancer dormancy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 94, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Uhr, J.W.; Scheuermann, R.H.; Street, N.E.; Vitetta, E.S. Cancer dormancy: Opportunities for new therapeutic approaches. Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Clark, A.M.; Kumar, M.P.; Wheeler, S.E.; Young, C.L.; Venkataramanan, R.; Stolz, D.B.; Griffith, L.G.; Lauffenburger, D.A.; Wells, A. A Model of Dormant-Emergent Metastatic Breast Cancer Progression Enabling Exploration of Biomarker Signatures. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2018, 17, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Barrios, J.; Wieder, R. Dual FGF-2, and integrin alpha5beta1 signaling mediate GRAF-induced RhoA inactivation in a model of breast cancer dormancy. Cancer Microenviron. Off. J. Int. Cancer Microenviron. Soc. 2009, 2, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, X.; Fryknas, M.; Hernlund, E.; Fayad, W.; De Milito, A.; Olofsson, M.H.; Gogvadze, V.; Dang, L.; Pahlman, S.; Schughart, L.A.; et al. Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction as a strategy for targeting tumor cells in metabolically compromised microenvironments. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Torrano, V.; Carracedo, A. Quiescence-like Metabolism to Push Cancer Out of the Race. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 997–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Crea, F.; Nur Saidy, N.R.; Collins, C.C.; Wang, Y. The epigenetic/noncoding origin of tumor dormancy. Trends Mol. Med. 2015, 21, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Garcia-Bloj, B.; Moses, C.; Sgro, A.; Plani-Lam, J.; Arooj, M.; Duffy, C.; Thiruvengadam, S.; Sorolla, A.; Rashwan, R.; Mancera, R.L.; et al. Waking up dormant tumor suppressor genes with zinc fingers, TALEs and the CRISPR/dCas9 system. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 60535–60554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bartosh, T.; Ullah, M.; Zeitouni, S.; Beaver, J.; Prockop, D. Cancer cells enter dormancy after cannibalizing mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6447–E6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, W.; Dong, J.; Haiech, J.; Kilhoffer, M.C.; Zeniou, M. Cancer stem cell quiescence and plasticity as major challenges in cancer therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1740936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Almog, N.; Briggs, C.; Beheshti, A.; Ma, L.; Wilkie, K.P.; Rietman, E.; Hlatky, L. Transcriptional changes induced by the tumor dormancy-associated microRNA-190. Transcription 2013, 4, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sosa, M.S.; Avivar-Valderas, A.; Bragado, P.; Wen, H.C.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. ERK1/2 and p38alpha/beta signaling in tumor cell quiescence: Opportunities to control the dormant residual disease. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5850–5857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Asai, T.; Liu, Y.; Di Giandomenico, S.; Bae, N.; Ndiaye-Lobry, D.; Deblasio, A.; Menendez, S.; Antipin, Y.; Reva, B.; Wevrick, R.; et al. Necdin, a p53 target gene, regulates the quiescence and response to genotoxic stress of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Blood 2012, 120, 1601–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cubillos-Ruiz, J.R.; Bettigole, S.E.; Glimcher, L.H. Tumorigenic and immunosuppressive effects of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cancer. Cell 2017, 168, 692–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Holmgren, L.; O’Reilly, M.S.; Folkman, J. Dormancy of micrometastases: Balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cole, S.W. Chronic inflammation and breast cancer recurrence. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 3418–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gao, X.-L.; Zhang, M.; Tang, Y.-L.; Liang, X.-H. Cancer cell dormancy: Mechanisms and implications of cancer recurrence and metastasis. OncoTargets Ther. 2017, 10, 5219–5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, Y.-H.V.; Middleton, K.; You, L.; Sun, Y. A review of microfluidic approaches for investigating cancer extravasation during metastasis. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2018, 4, 17104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Boussommier-Calleja, A.; Li, R.; Chen, M.B.; Wong, S.C.; Kamm, R.D. Microfluidics: A new tool for modeling cancer-immune interactions. Trends Cancer 2016, 2, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dong, Y.; Skelley, A.M.; Merdek, K.D.; Sprott, K.M.; Jiang, C.; Pierceall, W.E.; Lin, J.; Stocum, M.; Carney, W.P.; Smirnov, D.A. Microfluidics and Circulating Tumor Cells. J. Mol. Diagn. 2013, 15, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cho, H.; Kim, J.; Song, H.; Sohn, K.Y.; Jeon, M.; Han, K.H. Microfluidic technologies for circulating tumor cell isolation. Analyst 2018, 143, 2936–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rao, S.S.; Kondapaneni, R.V.; Narkhede, A.A. Bioengineered models to study tumor dormancy. J. Biol. Eng. 2019, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pradhan, S.; Slater, J.H. Datasets describing hydrogel properties and cellular metrics for modeling of tumor dormancy. Data Brief 2019, 25, 104128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pradhan, S.; Sperduto, J.L.; Farino, C.J.; Slater, J.H. Engineered In Vitro Models of Tumor Dormancy and Reactivation. J. Biol. Eng. 2018, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ambs, S.; Dennis, S.; Fairman, J.; Wright, M.; Papkoff, J. Inhibition of tumor growth correlates with the expression level of a human angiostatin transgene in transfected B16F10 melanoma cells. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 5773–5777. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Rofstad, E.K.; Graff, B.A. Thrombospondin-1-mediated metastasis suppression by the primary tumor in human melanoma xenografts. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2001, 117, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bayko, L.; Rak, J.; Man, S.; Bicknell, R.; Ferrara, N.; Kerbel, R.S. The dormant in vivo phenotype of early-stage primary human melanoma: Termination by overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis 1998, 2, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yu, J.L.; Rak, J.W.; Klement, G.; Kerbel, R.S. Vascular endothelial growth factor isoform expression as a determinant of blood vessel patterning in human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1838–1846. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Ghajar, C.M.; Peinado, H.; Mori, H.; Matei, I.R.; Evason, K.J.; Brazier, H.; Almeida, D.; Koller, A.; Hajjar, K.A.; Stainier, D.Y.; et al. The perivascular niche regulates breast tumor dormancy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Almog, N.; Ma, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Schwager, C.; Erber, R.; Short, S.; Hlatky, L.; Vajkoczy, P.; Huber, P.E.; Folkman, J.; et al. Transcriptional switch of dormant tumors to the fast-growing angiogenic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Russell, R.L.; Pedersen, A.N.; Kantor, J.; Geisinger, K.; Long, R.; Zbieranski, N.; Townsend, A.; Shelton, B.; Brunner, N.; Kute, T.E. Relationship of nm23 to proteolytic factors, proliferation and motility in breast cancer tissues and cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 78, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Zhan, R.; Chaudhuri, A.; Watabe, M.; Pai, S.K.; Hirota, S.; Hosobe, S.; Tsukada, T.; Miura, K.; Takano, Y.; et al. Interaction of KAI1 on tumor cells with DARC on vascular endothelium leads to metastasis suppression. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Seraj, M.J.; Samant, R.S.; Verderame, M.F.; Welch, D.R. Functional evidence for a novel human breast carcinoma metastasis suppressor, BRMS1, encoded at chromosome 11q13. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 2764–2769. [Google Scholar]
  40. Straume, O.; Shimamura, T.; Lampa, M.J.; Carretero, J.; Oyan, A.M.; Jia, D.; Borgman, C.L.; Soucheray, M.; Downing, S.R.; Short, S.M.; et al. Suppression of heat shock protein 27 induces long-term dormancy in human breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8699–8704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Romero, I.; Garrido, F.; Garcia-Lora, A.M. Metastases in immune-mediated dormancy: A new opportunity for targeting cancer. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6750–6757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quesnel, B. Tumor dormancy and immunoescape. APMIS Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 2008, 116, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Walker, N.D.; Elias, M.; Guiro, K.; Bhatia, R.; Greco, S.J.; Bryan, M.; Gergues, M.; Sandiford, O.A.; Ponzio, N.M.; Leibovich, S.J.; et al. Exosomes from differentially activated macrophages influence dormancy or resurgence of breast cancer cells within bone marrow stroma. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Luo, J.; Feng, X.X.; Luo, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Shu, Y.; Wang, S.S.; Qin, J.; Li, Y.C.; Zou, J.M.; et al. 14,15-EET induces the infiltration and tumor-promoting function of neutrophils to trigger the growth of minimal dormant metastases. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 43324–43336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. De Cock, J.M.; Shibue, T.; Dongre, A.; Keckesova, Z.; Reinhardt, F.; Weinberg, R.A. Inflammation triggers Zeb1-dependent to escape from tumor latency. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 6778–6784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sosnoski, D.M.; Norgard, R.J.; Grove, C.D.; Foster, S.J.; Mastro, A.M. Dormancy and growth of metastatic breast cancer cells in a bone-like microenvironment. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2015, 32, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saudemont, A.; Hamrouni, A.; Marchetti, P.; Liu, J.; Jouy, N.; Hetuin, D.; Colucci, F.; Quesnel, B. Dormant tumor cells develop cross-resistance to apoptosis induced by CTLs or imatinib mesylate via methylation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 4491–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Liang, X.; Yin, X.; Lv, J.; Tang, K.; Ma, J.; Ji, T.; Zhang, H.; Dong, W.; Jin, X.; et al. Blockade of IDO-kynurenine-AhR metabolic circuitry abrogates IFN-gamma-induced immunologic dormancy of tumor-repopulating cells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Keckesova, Z.; Donaher, J.L.; De Cock, J.; Freinkman, E.; Lingrell, S.; Bachovchin, D.A.; Bierie, B.; Tischler, V.; Noske, A.; Okondo, M.C.; et al. LACTB is a tumor suppressor that modulates lipid metabolism and cell state. Nature 2017, 543, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Havas, K.M.; Milchevskaya, V.; Radic, K.; Alladin, A.; Kafkia, E.; Garcia, M.; Stolte, J.; Klaus, B.; Rotmensz, N.; Gibson, T.J.; et al. Metabolic shifts in residual breast cancer drive tumor recurrence. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 2091–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fluegen, G.; Avivar-Valderas, A.; Wang, Y.; Padgen, M.R.; Williams, J.K.; Nobre, A.R.; Calvo, V.; Cheung, J.F.; Bravo-Cordero, J.J.; Entenberg, D.; et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity of disseminated tumour cells is preset by primary tumour hypoxic microenvironments. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Johnson, R.W.; Finger, E.C.; Olcina, M.M.; Vilalta, M.; Aguilera, T.; Miao, Y.; Merkel, A.R.; Johnson, J.R.; Sterling, J.A.; Wu, J.Y.; et al. Induction of LIFR confers a dormancy phenotype in breast cancer cells disseminated to the bone marrow. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 1078–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hoppe-Seyler, K.; Bossler, F.; Lohrey, C.; Bulkescher, J.; Rosl, F.; Jansen, L.; Mayer, A.; Vaupel, P.; Durst, M.; Hoppe-Seyler, F. Induction of dormancy in hypoxic human papillomavirus-positive cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E990–E998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lee, J.H.; Miele, M.E.; Hicks, D.J.; Phillips, K.K.; Trent, J.M.; Weissman, B.E.; Welch, D.R. KiSS-1, a novel human malignant melanoma metastasis-suppressor gene. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1996, 88, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gao, H.; Chakraborty, G.; Zhang, Z.; Akalay, I.; Gadiya, M.; Gao, Y.; Sinha, S.; Hu, J.; Jiang, C.; Akram, M.; et al. Multi-organ Site Metastatic Reactivation Mediated by Non-canonical Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Signaling. Cell 2016, 166, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Barkan, D.; Kleinman, H.; Simmons, J.L.; Asmussen, H.; Kamaraju, A.K.; Hoenorhoff, M.J.; Liu, Z.Y.; Costes, S.V.; Cho, E.H.; Lockett, S.; et al. Inhibition of metastatic outgrowth from single dormant tumor cells by targeting the cytoskeleton. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6241–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Barkan, D.; El Touny, L.H.; Michalowski, A.M.; Smith, J.A.; Chu, I.; Davis, A.S.; Webster, J.D.; Hoover, S.; Simpson, R.M.; Gauldie, J.; et al. Metastatic growth from dormant cells induced by a col-I-enriched fibrotic environment. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5706–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Allgayer, H.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. The urokinase receptor (u-PAR)—A link between tumor cell dormancy and minimal residual disease in bone marrow? APMIS Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 2008, 116, 602–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. El Touny, L.H.; Vieira, A.; Mendoza, A.; Khanna, C.; Hoenerhoff, M.J.; Green, J.E. Combined SFK/MEK inhibition prevents metastatic outgrowth of dormant tumor cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rajbhandari, N.; Lin, W.C.; Wehde, B.L.; Triplett, A.A.; Wagner, K.U. Autocrine IGF1 signaling mediates pancreatic tumor cell dormancy in the absence of oncogenic drivers. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 2243–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ruppender, N.; Larson, S.; Lakely, B.; Kollath, L.; Brown, L.; Coleman, I.; Coleman, R.; Nguyen, H.; Nelson, P.S.; Corey, E.; et al. Cellular adhesion promotes prostate cancer cells escape from dormancy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mao, W.; Peters, H.L.; Sutton, M.N.; Orozco, A.F.; Pang, L.; Yang, H.; Lu, Z.; Bast, R.C., Jr. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin 8, and insulinlike growth factor in sustaining autophagic DIRAS3-induced dormant ovarian cancer xenografts. Cancer 2019, 125, 1267–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, L.Y.; Shan, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, E.H.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, H. Aurora kinase A induces chemotherapy resistance through revival of dormant cells in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2019, 41, 2239–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Taichman, R.S.; Patel, L.R.; Bedenis, R.; Wang, J.; Weidner, S.; Schumann, T.; Yumoto, K.; Berry, J.E.; Shiozawa, Y.; Pienta, K.J. GAS6 receptor status is associated with dormancy and bone metastatic tumor formation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ren, D.; Dai, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Guo, W.; Ye, L.; Huang, S.; Chen, X.; Lai, Y.; Du, H.; et al. Wnt5a induces and maintains prostate cancer cells dormancy in bone. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 428–449. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu-Lee, L.Y.; Yu, G.; Lee, Y.C.; Lin, S.C.; Pan, J.; Pan, T.; Yu, K.J.; Liu, B.; Creighton, C.J.; Rodriguez-Canales, J.; et al. Osteoblast-secreted factors mediate dormancy of metastatic prostate cancer in the bone via activation of the TGFbetaRIII-p38MAPK-pS249/T252RB pathway. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 2911–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yumoto, K.; Eber, M.R.; Wang, J.; Cackowski, F.C.; Decker, A.M.; Lee, E.; Nobre, A.R.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A.; Jung, Y.; Taichman, R.S. Axl is required for TGF-beta2-induced dormancy of prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Price, T.T.; Burness, M.L.; Sivan, A.; Warner, M.J.; Cheng, R.; Lee, C.H.; Olivere, L.; Comatas, K.; Magnani, J.; Kim Lyerly, H.; et al. Dormant breast cancer micrometastases reside in specific bone marrow niches that regulate their transit to and from bone. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 340ra373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Luo, X.L.; Deng, C.; Su, X.D.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X.P.; Liang, S.B.; Liu, J.; Fu, L. Loss of MED12 induces tumor dormancy in human epithelial ovarian cancer via downregulation of EGFR. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 3532–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sinha, G.; Rameshwar, P. N-cadherin in cancer dormancy. Cell Death 2015, 1, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abravanel, D.L.; Belka, G.K.; Pan, T.C.; Pant, D.K.; Collins, M.A.; Sterner, C.J.; Chodosh, L.A. Notch promotes recurrence of dormant tumor cells following HER2/neu-targeted therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 2484–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Marusawa, H.; Chiba, T. A marker for dormant cancer stem cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1353–1355, discussion 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gao, H.; Chakraborty, G.; Lee-Lim, A.P.; Mo, Q.; Decker, M.; Vonica, A.; Shen, R.; Brogi, E.; Brivanlou, A.H.; Giancotti, F.G. The BMP Inhibitor Coco Reactivates Breast Cancer Cells at Lung Metastatic sites. Cell 2012, 150, 764–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kobayashi, A.; Okuda, H.; Xing, F.; Pandey, P.R.; Watabe, M.; Hirota, S.; Pai, S.K.; Liu, W.; Fukuda, K.; Chambers, C.; et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 7 in dormancy and metastasis of prostate cancer stem-like cells in bone. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 2641–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sharma, S.; Xing, F.; Liu, Y.; Wu, K.; Said, N.; Pochampally, R.; Shiozawa, Y.; Lin, H.K.; Balaji, K.C.; Watabe, K. Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Mediates Metastatic Dormancy of Prostate Cancer in Bone. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 19351–19363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Jia, Q.; Yang, F.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Bao, B.; Li, K.; Wei, F.; Zhang, C.; Jia, H. Low Levels of Sox2 are required for Melanoma Tumor-Repopulating Cell Dormancy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shah, S.N.; Cope, L.; Poh, W.; Belton, A.; Roy, S.; Talbot, C.C., Jr.; Sukumar, S.; Huso, D.L.; Resar, L.M. HMGA1, a master regulator of tumor progression in triple-negative breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kim, J.K.; Jung, Y.; Wang, J.; Joseph, J.; Mishra, A.; Hill, E.E.; Krebsbach, P.H.; Pienta, K.J.; Shiozawa, Y.; Taichman, R.S. TBK1 regulates prostate cancer dormancy through mTOR inhibition. Neoplasia 2013, 15, 1064–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jiang, J.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, M.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Wang, S.-S.; Wu, J.-S.; Yu, X.-H.; Wu, J.-B.; Pang, X.; et al. PRRX1 Regulates Cellular Phenotype Plasticity and Dormancy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through miR-642b-3p. Neoplasia 2019, 21, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gregoire, J.M.; Fleury, L.; Salazar-Cardozo, C.; Alby, F.; Masson, V.; Arimondo, P.B.; Ausseil, F. Identification of epigenetic factors regulating the mesenchyme to epithelium transition by RNA interference screening in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Brien, G.L.; Healy, E.; Jerman, E.; Conway, E.; Fadda, E.; O’Donovan, D.; Krivtsov, A.V.; Rice, A.M.; Kearney, C.J.; Flaus, A.; et al. A chromatin-independent role of Polycomb-like 1 to stabilize p53 and promote cellular quiescence. Genes Dev. 2015, 29, 2231–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sosa, M.S.; Parikh, F.; Maia, A.G.; Estrada, Y.; Bosch, A.; Bragado, P.; Ekpin, E.; George, A.; Zheng, Y.; Lam, H.M.; et al. NR2F1 controls tumour cell dormancy via SOX9- and RARbeta-driven quiescence programmes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gawrzak, S.; Rinaldi, L.; Gregorio, S.; Arenas, E.J.; Salvador, F.; Urosevic, J.; Figueras-Puig, C.; Rojo, F.; Del Barco Barrantes, I.; Cejalvo, J.M.; et al. MSK1 regulates luminal cell differentiation and metastatic dormancy in ER(+) breast cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bliss, S.A.; Sinha, G.; Sandiford, O.A.; Williams, L.M.; Engelberth, D.J.; Guiro, K.; Isenalumhe, L.L.; Greco, S.J.; Ayer, S.; Bryan, M.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes stimulate cycling quiescence and early breast cancer dormancy in bone marrow. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 5832–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tiram, G.; Segal, E.; Krivitsky, A.; Shreberk-Hassidim, R.; Ferber, S.; Ofek, P.; Udagawa, T.; Edry, L.; Shomron, N.; Roniger, M.; et al. Identification of dormancy-associated MicroRNAs for the design of osteosarcoma-targeted dendritic polyglycerol nanopolyplexes. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2028–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nabavi, N.; Saidy, N.R.N.; Venalainen, E.; Haegert, A.; Parolia, A.; Xue, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, R.; Dong, X.; Collins, C.; et al. miR-100-5p inhibition induces apoptosis in dormant prostate cancer cells and prevents the emergence of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Watson, K.L.; Jones, R.A.; Anthony, B.; Moorehead, R.A. The miR-200b/200a/429 cluster prevents metastasis and induces dormancy in a murine claudin-low mammary tumor cell line. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 369, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Maroni, P.; Bendinelli, P.; Matteucci, E.; Desiderio, M.A. The therapeutic effect of miR-125b is enhanced by the prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2/cyclooxygenase 2 blockade and hampers ETS1 in the context of the microenvironment of bone metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ranganathan, A.C.; Adam, A.P.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. Opposing roles of mitogenic and stress signaling pathways in the induction of cancer dormancy. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ranganathan, A.C.; Zhang, L.; Adam, A.P.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. Functional coupling of p38-induced up-regulation of BiP and activation of RNA-dependent protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase to drug resistance of dormant carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 1702–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Adam, A.P.; George, A.; Schewe, D.; Bragado, P.; Iglesias, B.V.; Ranganathan, A.C.; Kourtidis, A.; Conklin, D.S.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. Computational identification of a p38SAPK-regulated transcription factor network required for tumor cell quiescence. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 5664–5672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Schewe, D.M.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. ATF6alpha-Rheb-mTOR signaling promotes survival of dormant tumor cells in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10519–10524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bragado, P.; Estrada, Y.; Parikh, F.; Krause, S.; Capobianco, C.; Farina, H.G.; Schewe, D.M.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. TGF-beta2 dictates disseminated tumour cell fate in target organs through TGF-beta-RIII and p38alpha/beta signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cackowski, F.C.; Eber, M.R.; Rhee, J.; Decker, A.M.; Yumoto, K.; Berry, J.E.; Lee, E.; Shiozawa, Y.; Jung, Y.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A.; et al. Mer Tyrosine Kinase Regulates Disseminated Prostate Cancer Cellular Dormancy. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 118, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lotan, T.; Hickson, J.; Souris, J.; Huo, D.; Taylor, J.; Li, T.; Otto, K.; Yamada, S.D.; Macleod, K.; Rinker-Schaeffer, C.W. c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activating kinase 1/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4-mediated inhibition of SKOV3ip.1 ovarian cancer metastasis involves growth arrest and p21 up-regulation. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 2166–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Vander Griend, D.J.; Kocherginsky, M.; Hickson, J.A.; Stadler, W.M.; Lin, A.; Rinker-Schaeffer, C.W. Suppression of metastatic colonization by the context-dependent activation of the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase kinases JNKK1/MKK4 and MKK7. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 10984–10991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Naumov, G.N.; Bender, E.; Zurakowski, D.; Kang, S.Y.; Sampson, D.; Flynn, E.; Watnick, R.S.; Straume, O.; Akslen, L.A.; Folkman, J.; et al. A model of human tumor dormancy: An angiogenic switch from the nonangiogenic phenotype. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Naumov, G.N.; Folkman, J.; Straume, O. Tumor dormancy due to failure of angiogenesis: Role of the microenvironment. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2009, 26, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Seidi, K.; Banimohamad-Shotorbani, B.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Yousefi, B. Combination of nanotechnology with vascular targeting agents for effective cancer therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 233, 2982–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Benzekry, S.; Gandolfi, A.; Hahnfeldt, P. Global dormancy of metastases due to systemic inhibition of angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Almog, N.; Henke, V.; Flores, L.; Hlatky, L.; Kung, A.L.; Wright, R.D.; Berger, R.; Hutchinson, L.; Naumov, G.N.; Bender, E.; et al. Prolonged dormancy of human liposarcoma is associated with impaired tumor angiogenesis. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2006, 20, 947–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Prunier, C.; Baker, D.; ten Dijke, P.; Ritsma, L. TGF-β Family Signaling Pathways in Cellular Dormancy. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Shah, S.A.; Zarei, M.; Manjili, S.H.; Guruli, G.; Wang, X.Y.; Manjili, M.H. Immunotherapy of cancer: Targeting cancer during active disease or during dormancy? Immunotherapy 2017, 9, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Baxevanis, C.N. T-cell recognition of non-mutated tumor antigens in healthy individuals: Connecting endogenous immunity and tumor dormancy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2019, 68, 705–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Teng, M.W.; Swann, J.B.; Koebel, C.M.; Schreiber, R.D.; Smyth, M.J. Immune-mediated dormancy: An equilibrium with cancer. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008, 84, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Romero, I.; Garrido, C.; Algarra, I.; Collado, A.; Garrido, F.; Garcia-Lora, A.M. T lymphocytes restrain spontaneous metastases in permanent dormancy. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 1958–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Park, S.L.; Buzzai, A.; Rautela, J.; Hor, J.L.; Hochheiser, K.; Effern, M.; McBain, N.; Wagner, T.; Edwards, J.; McConville, R.; et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T cells promote melanoma-immune equilibrium in skin. Nature 2019, 565, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Saudemont, A.; Jouy, N.; Hetuin, D.; Quesnel, B. NK cells that are activated by CXCL10 can kill dormant tumor cells that resist CTL-mediated lysis and can express B7-H1 that stimulates T cells. Blood 2005, 105, 2428–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Manjili, M.H.; Butler, S.E. Role of Tregs in cancer dormancy or recurrence. Immunol. Investig. 2016, 45, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lan, Q.; Peyvandi, S.; Duffey, N.; Huang, Y.-T.; Barras, D.; Held, W.; Richard, F.; Delorenzi, M.; Sotiriou, C.; Desmedt, C.; et al. Type I interferon/IRF7 axis instigates chemotherapy-induced immunological dormancy in breast cancer. Oncogene 2019, 38, 2814–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Albrengues, J.; Shields, M.A.; Ng, D.; Park, C.G.; Ambrico, A.; Poindexter, M.E.; Upadhyay, P.; Uyeminami, D.L.; Pommier, A.; Küttner, V.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells in mice. Science 2018, 361, eaao4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Aqbi, H.F.; Wallace, M.; Sappal, S.; Payne, K.K.; Manjili, M.H. IFN-gamma orchestrates tumor elimination, tumor dormancy, tumor escape, and progression. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 103, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bakacs, T.; Mehrishi, J.N. Breast and other cancer dormancy as a therapeutic endpoint: Speculative recombinant T cell receptor ligand (RTL) adjuvant therapy worth considering? BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Minas, T.Z.; Han, J.; Javaheri, T.; Hong, S.H.; Schlederer, M.; Saygideger-Kont, Y.; Celik, H.; Mueller, K.M.; Temel, I.; Ozdemirli, M.; et al. YK-4-279 effectively antagonizes EWS-FLI1 induced leukemia in a transgenic mouse model. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37678–37694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Javaheri, T.; Kazemi, Z.; Pencik, J.; Pham, H.T.T.; Kauer, M.; Noorizadeh, R.; Sax, B.; Nivarthi, H.; Schlederer, M.; Maurer, B.; et al. Increased survival and cell cycle progression pathways are required for EWS/FLI1-induced malignant transformation. Cell Death Disease 2016, 7, e2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Morecki, S.; Pugatsch, T.; Levi, S.; Moshel, Y.; Slavin, S. Tumor-cell vaccination induces tumor dormancy in a murine model of B-cell leukemia/lymphoma (BCL1). Int. J. Cancer 1996, 65, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Retsky, M.; Demicheli, R.; Hrushesky, W.; Baum, M.; Gukas, I. Surgery triggers outgrowth of latent distant disease in breast cancer: An inconvenient truth? Cancers 2010, 2, 305–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Krall, J.A.; Reinhardt, F.; Mercury, O.A.; Pattabiraman, D.R.; Brooks, M.W.; Dougan, M.; Lambert, A.W.; Bierie, B.; Ploegh, H.L.; Dougan, S.K.; et al. The systemic response to surgery triggers the outgrowth of distant immune-controlled tumors in mouse models of dormancy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaan3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mima, S.; Kakinuma, C.; Higuchi, T.; Saeki, K.; Yamada, T.; Uematsu, R.; Ishino, M.; Kito, N.; Nishikawa, H.; Kuniyoshi, H.; et al. FF-10502, an antimetabolite with novel activity on dormant cells, is superior to gemcitabine for targeting pancreatic cancer cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2018, 366, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aqbi, H.F.; Tyutyunyk-Massey, L.; Keim, R.C.; Butler, S.E.; Thekkudan, T.; Joshi, S.; Smith, T.M.; Bandyopadhyay, D.; Idowu, M.O.; Bear, H.D.; et al. Autophagy-deficient breast cancer shows early tumor recurrence and escape from dormancy. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 22113–22122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Barkan, D.; Green, J.E.; Chambers, A.F. Extracellular matrix: A gatekeeper in the transition from dormancy to metastatic growth. Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Keeratichamroen, S.; Lirdprapamongkol, K.; Svasti, J. Mechanism of ECM-induced dormancy and chemoresistance in A549 human lung carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Carlson, P.; Dasgupta, A.; Grzelak, C.A.; Kim, J.; Barrett, A.; Coleman, I.M.; Shor, R.E.; Goddard, E.T.; Dai, J.; Schweitzer, E.M.; et al. Targeting the perivascular niche sensitizes disseminated tumour cells to chemotherapy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chong, C.R.; Jänne, P.A. The quest to overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies in cancer. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Takeishi, S.; Nakayama, K.I. To wake up cancer stem cells, or to let them sleep, that is the question. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Dianat-Moghadam, H.; Heydarifard, M.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Panahi, Y.; Hamishehkar, H.; Pouremamali, F.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Nouri, M. Cancer stem cells-emanated therapy resistance: Implications for liposomal drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2018, 288, 62–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Majidinia, M.; Aghazadeh, J.; Jahanban-Esfahlani, R.; Yousefi, B. The roles of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in tissue development and regenerative medicine. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 5598–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ford, A.M.; Mansur, M.B.; Furness, C.L.; van Delft, F.W.; Okamura, J.; Suzuki, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Kaneko, Y.; Greaves, M. Protracted dormancy of pre-leukemic stem cells. Leukemia 2015, 29, 2202–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Plaks, V.; Kong, N.; Werb, Z. The cancer stem cell niche: How essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Roato, I.; Ferracini, R. Cancer Stem Cells, Bone and Tumor Microenvironment: Key Players in Bone Metastases. Cancers 2018, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Borgen, E.; Rypdal, M.C.; Sosa, M.S.; Renolen, A.; Schlichting, E.; Lønning, P.E.; Synnestvedt, M.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A.; Naume, B. NR2F1 stratifies dormant disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2018, 20, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Selli, C.; Turnbull, A.K.; Pearce, D.A.; Li, A.; Fernando, A.; Wills, J.; Renshaw, L.; Thomas, J.S.; Dixon, J.M.; Sims, A.H. Molecular changes during extended neoadjuvant letrozole treatment of breast cancer: Distinguishing acquired resistance from dormant tumours. Breast Cancer Res. 2019, 21, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Majidinia, M.; Darband, S.G.; Kaviani, M.; Nabavi, S.M.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Yousefi, B. Cross-regulation between Notch signaling pathway and miRNA machinery in cancer. DNA Repair 2018, 66, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Marlow, R.; Honeth, G.; Lombardi, S.; Cariati, M.; Hessey, S.; Pipili, A.; Mariotti, V.; Buchupalli, B.; Foster, K.; Bonnet, D.; et al. A novel model of dormancy for bone metastatic breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 6886–6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Almog, N.; Ma, L.; Schwager, C.; Brinkmann, B.G.; Beheshti, A.; Vajkoczy, P.; Folkman, J.; Hlatky, L.; Abdollahi, A. Consensus micro RNAs governing the switch of dormant tumors to the fast-growing angiogenic phenotype. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ranganathan, A.C.; Adam, A.P.; Zhang, L.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. Tumor cell dormancy induced by p38SAPK and ER-stress signaling: An adaptive advantage for metastatic cells? Cancer Biol. Ther. 2006, 5, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 11 01207 g001 550
Figure 1. The implication of the immune system in tumor cell dormancy.
Figure 1. The implication of the immune system in tumor cell dormancy.
Cancers 11 01207 g001
Cancers 11 01207 g002 550
Figure 2. The implication of ECM and p38 signaling in tumor dormancy.
Figure 2. The implication of ECM and p38 signaling in tumor dormancy.
Cancers 11 01207 g002
Cancers 11 01207 g003 550
Figure 3. Tumor dormancy as a therapeutic opportunity to fight cancer back.
Figure 3. Tumor dormancy as a therapeutic opportunity to fight cancer back.
Cancers 11 01207 g003
Table
Table 1. Molecular cues involved in tumor cell dormancy.
Table 1. Molecular cues involved in tumor cell dormancy.
Dormancy FactorModeMajor FindingsRef
AngiostatinInducer of angiogenic dormancyUpregulation of Angiostatin drive long-term dormancy of primary tumors, inhibit tumor growth, and reduce cancer metastases.[31]
Thrombospondin-1Inducer of angiogenic dormancyOverexpression of Thrombospondin-1 inhibits melanoma angiogenesis, lung colonization, and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis.[32]
VEGF/VPF121Inhibitor of angiogenic dormancyOverexpression of VEGF/VPF121 result in tumor growth and escape from dormancy.[33]
(VEGF(121)
VEGF(165) overexpression		Inhibitor of angiogenic dormancyThe level and VEGF isoforms determine the fate of aggressive tumor growth vs. nontumorigenic and dormant tumor.[34]
VEGF(189)
overexpression		Inducer of angiogenic dormancy
Thrombospondin-1Inducer of angiogenic dormancyEndothelial-derived Thrombospondin-1 induces long-lasting BCC dormancy. This repressive nod is lost in sprouting neovasculature where active TGFβ1 and periostin act as tumor-promoting factors derived from endothelial tip cells.[35]
TGFβ1, PeriostinInhibitor of angiogenic dormancy
Thrombospondin, Angiomotin, Tropomyosin, TGF-β2, P4HA1, EphA5, H2BK, IGFBP-5Inducer of angiogenic dormancyDormant tumors undergo a stable genetic reprogramming during their switch to the fast-growing phenotype by downregulation of angiogenesis inhibitors such as Thrombospondin and decreased the sensitivity of angiogenic tumors to angiostatin along with upregulation of angiogenesis-related genes.[36]
EGFR-1, IGF-IR, CD73, PI3K, ESM-1, PIK3CB, TIMP-3Inhibitor of angiogenic dormancy
MME1(NM23)Inducer of angiogenic dormancyNM23 inhibits EGF-induced cell migration. Increase the expression of metastasis-related genes TIMP-1, E-Cadherin and β-Catenin, reduce the expression of VEGR, CD44V6, and MMP-2 and reduce metastasis.[37]
Kai-1 (CD82)Inducer of angiogenic dormancyBinding of tumor cell surface-expressed Kai1 with endothelial DARC inhibit tumor cell proliferation, induce senescence by modulating the expression of TBX2 and p21 and suppress metastasis.[38]
BRMS1Inducer of angiogenic dormancyBRMS1 inhibits angiogenesis through blocking NF/KB activity. It can also reduce metastatic potential but not tumorigenicity.[39]
HSP27Inhibitor of angiogenic dormancyDownregulation of HSP27 associated with reduced endothelial cell proliferation and decreased secretion of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and induction of long-term dormancy.[40]
CTL response, MHC class I, NK cellsInducer of immunologic dormancyAn activate CTL response can maintain immune equilibrium with metastatic dormant cells. Immune dormancy arrest cancer cell growth and promotes angiogenic control.[41]
B7-H1 and B7.1Inducer of immunologic dormancyDormant tumor cells up-regulate B7-H1 and B7.1 and resist CTL-mediated lysis.[42]
Macrophage (MΦs)Inhibitor/inducer of immunologic dormancyBy forming gap junctional interactions with CSCs, the M2 MΦs promote cycling quiescence and carboplatin resistance. M1 MΦ-derived exosomes activated NFкB to reverse quiescent BCCs to cycling cells in vivo.[43]
NeutrophilsInhibitor of immunologic dormancy14,15-EET trigger neutrophil infiltration in metastatic lesions by activating STAT3/JNK-hIL-8/mCXCL15 and mir-155 which converts tumor-suppressing function of neutrophils to tumor-promoting in vivo.
In the presence of G-CSF/IL-6, 14,15-EET enhance STAT3 activation in neutrophils to decrease TRAIL expression and increase MMP-9 expression to induce angiogenesis during dormant micrometastases growth.
Neutrophil depletion or blocking hIL-8/mCXCL15 abrogate micrometastases induced by 14,15-EET.		[44]
Zeb1Inhibitor of immunologic dormancyInflammation triggers Zeb1 to promote EMT and give rise to metastatic outgrowth.[45]
TNFα, IL-βInhibitor of immunologic dormancyAddition of bone remodeling cytokines, TNFα, and IL-β to dormant cancer cells induce proliferation and occurrence of latent bone metastasis.[46]
SOCS1, IL-3Inducer of immunologic dormancyT-cell inactivation and resistance to apoptosis are mediated by methylation of SOCS1, deregulation of JAK/STAT and overproduction of IL-3 by dormant cells.[47]
IFN-γInducer of immunologic dormancyIFN-γ signaling triggers differentiated tumor cell apoptosis via STAT1; however, when IDO1 and AhR are overexpressed as in DTCs, IFN-gamma induces p27 via IDO1/AhR and inhibits STAT1 signaling, and favors dormancy state.[48]
LPS/EGFInhibitor of immunologic dormancyActivated immune/stromal cells stimulate the resident hepatic cells to derive tumor growth.[9]
Mitochondrial dysfunctionInhibitor of metabolic dormancyVLX600 impairs OXPHOS and drives a HIF-1α-dependent switch to glycolysis, which this metabolic pathway can’t meet the energy demands of tumor cells, thus induction of autophagy is unavoidable. Yet, due to lack of HIF-1α-stabilization and glucose inaccessibility in metabolically stressed environments, shifting to glycolysis mode will be restricted, consequently, tumor cells undergo apoptosis.[11]
LACTBInhibitor of metabolic dormancyMitochondrial tumor suppressor, LACTB potently inhibits the proliferation of BC cells via altering mitochondrial lipid metabolism and differentiation of BC cells by reduction of the levels of mitochondrial phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, which is involved in the synthesis of mitochondrial phosphatidylethanolamine.[49]
FA metabolism, ROS, oxidative DNA damageInducer of metabolic dormancyResidual cells display altered lipid metabolism, elevated ROS, and increased oxidative DNA damage. Thus, lipid metabolism and ROS are therapeutic targets for reducing tumor recurrence in BC patients.[50]
NR2F1Inducer of hypoxic dormancyHypoxic HNSCC and breast primary tumor microenvironments display upregulation of key dormancy (NR2F1, DEC2, p27) and hypoxia (GLUT1, HIF1α) genes. Post-hypoxic DTCs were frequently NR2F1hi/DEC2hi/p27hi/TGFβ2hi, dormant and chemotherapy-resistant.[51]
LIFRInducer of hypoxic dormancyIn BC patients with bone metastases, low LIFR levels negatively correlate with HIF-1α activity and disease outcome. Hypoxia reduces the LIFR: STAT3: SOCS3 signaling in BC cells. Loss of the LIFR or STAT3 reactivates dormant BC cells to proliferate and to downregulate stem cell-related genes and specifically benefit their bone colonization.[52]
E6/E7 antigenInhibitor of hypoxic dormancyHuman papillomavirus-infected cancer cells can enter into reversible dormancy state, with reducing the synthesis of viral antigen and enhanced therapeutic resistance, and uphold tumor recurrence upon reoxygenation.[53]
Kiss-1, CRSP3Inducer of ECM dormancyKiss-1 expression suppresses malignant melanoma metastasis, inhibits motility, chemotaxis, and invasion, perhaps by suppressing the expression of MMP-9. CRSP3 regulate the transcriptional expression of Kiss-1.[54]
Type I collagen (Col-I)Inhibitor of ECM dormancyAtypical tetraspanin TM4SF1 as a potent inducer of metastatic recurrence of BC couples DDR1 to PKCα. This kinase activates JAK2. Then, JAK2/STAT3 activates the expression of SOX2 and NANOG, maintain the manifestation of CSC traits, and fuel metastatic recurrence in the bone, lung, and brain.[55]
FibronectinInhibitor of ECM dormancyFibronectin/β1 Integrin/MLCK axis induces a transition from a quiescent to proliferative, metastatic outgrowth.[56]
Col-IInhibitor of ECM dormancyCol-I/β1 Integrin/SRC/FAK/ERK/MLCK signaling induce dormant cells to switch to proliferative metastatic lesions.[57]
u-PARInducer of ECM dormancyu-PAR, is an essential molecule in BM disseminated tumor cells for long-standing survival during dormancy by regulation of u-PAR of α5β1 integrins, and signal propagation from Fibronectin through the p38, ERK, and EGF-receptor signaling.[58]
FAK, Src, MEK1/2 (ERK1/2)Inhibitor of ECM dormancyTargeting Src prevents the proliferative response of dormant cells to external stimuli. MEK1/2 inhibition suppresses their survival and eliminates tumor relapse.[59]
KRAS/C-Myc, IGF1/AKTInducer of ECM dormancyKRAS/C-Myc negative dormant cells represent an increase in autocrine IGF1/AKT. Inhibition of IGF-1R reduces residual disease burden and cancer recurrence.[60]
TGFB2Inducer of ECM dormancyCellular adhesion promotes PC cells to escape from dormancy and lethal metastasis. The mechanism involves downregulation of TGFB2, E2F4, and upregulation of MLCK, CDK6.[61]
DIRAS family GTPase 3 (DIRAS3)Inducer of ECM dormancyDIRAS3 decrease ERK/AKT signaling and induce autophagy. Addition of VEGF, IGF-1, and IL-8 abrogate sustaining autophagic DIRAS3-induced dormancy. A combination of antibodies targeting VEGF, IGF-1, and IL-8 prevent outgrowth of dormant cells.[62]
Aurora kinase A (AURKA)Inhibitor of ECM dormancyActivation of URKA-Erk1/2 signaling pathway induces chemotherapy resistance and promote metastasis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.[63]
Fbxw7Inducer of ECM dormancyDormant breast cancer cells overexpress Fbxw7, which acts as the negative control of cell cycle and its disruption avoids entry of dormant cells into the quiescent state, rendering them sensitive to chemotherapy.[64]
Wnt5aInducer of ECM dormancyWnt5a/ROR2/SIAH2 signaling axis is involved in the induction and maintenance of PCa cells dormancy in the bone.[65]
TGFβ2/ GDF10Inducer of ECM dormancyOsteoblast-secreted proteins induce TGFβRIII-p38MAPK-pS249/T252RB pathway to mediate dormancy of metastatic PC in the bone.[66]
Axl, Gas6Inducer of ECM dormancyAxl is a tyrosine kinase receptor for growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6). Axl and Gas6 are required for TGF-β2-induced dormancy of PC cells in the bone marrow.[67]
E-selectin, SDF-1Inducer of ECM dormancyProliferating and dormant BCCs inhabit different regions, whereas E-selectin interactions allow BCC residency in the BM, the SDF-1/CXCR4 binding anchors BCCs to the metastatic niche. Blocking CXCR4 (SDF receptor) and E-selectin eliminates latent micrometastases residing in supportive bone, excising occurrence of relapsed disease.[68]
MED12Inducer of ECM dormancyThe lack of MED12 induces tumor cell dormancy. Re-expression of MED12 abrogates tumor cell dormancy by positively controlling EGFR expression.[69]
N-cadherinInducer of CSC dormancyN-cadherin upregulation leads to downregulation of E-cadherin, upregulation of Connexin, EMT, and dormancy.[70]
NotchInducer of CSC dormancyNotch remain activated in dormant residual cells and accelerates tumor recurrence.[71]
CD13Inducer of CSC dormancyCD13 is a cancer stem cell dormancy marker in HCC.[72]
CocoInhibitor of CSC dormancyCoco enhances cancer stem cell traits and antagonizes TGF-β activity. Coco reactivates dormant BC cells in the lung whereas BMP signaling revives metastasis dormancy in the lung.[73]
BMP7Inducer of CSC dormancyBone stromal cells-derived BMP7 stimulates senescence in prostate CSCs by activating BMP7-BMPR2/p38/p21/NDRG1 axis.[74]
SPARCInducer of CSC dormancySPARC demethylation (activation) significantly stimulate the expression of BMP7 in bone marrow stromal cells and is required for BMP7 mediated stemness and senescence of PC cells.[75]
SOX2Inducer of CSC dormancyLow level of SOX2 expression is required for DTCs maintenance. SOX2 complete depletion of SOX results in activation of STAT3-p53-caspase axis and induction of cell apoptosis.[76]
HMGA1Inhibitor of CSC dormancyHMGA1 reprogram triple-negative BC cells to a stem-like state, driving their metastatic outgrowth. HMGA1 silencing excise cancer stem/initiator cells and prevents oncogenesis.[77]
TBK1Inducer of CSC dormancyPC cells target the HSC niche in mouse bone marrow during metastasis. Interaction with niche osteoblasts activate TBK1 expression and inhibit mTOR in PCa cells. Silencing TBK1 dampen drug resistance and formation of PCa stem-like cells.[78]
p53, NecdinInducer of CSC DormancyNecdin-knock out adult HSCs is more proliferative and less quiescent than wild-type HSCs, indicating that Necdin resembles p53 function in supporting HSC dormancy during stable conditions.[19]
PRRX1Inducer of CSC DormancyPRRX1 positively controls dormancy through TGF-β and promoting EMT in HNSCC and its activity is correlated with low expression of miR-642b-3p and TGF-β2 and p38.[79]
Zeb1, G9a, SMAD5, SMARCD3,Inhibitor of Epigenetic dormancyThese genes control EMT and control dormancy by reversible activation of stem cell-like properties of breast cancer cells in vitro.[80]
KAT5, DOT1LInducer of epigenetic dormancyThese genes are involved in MET, promoting epithelial morphologies and thus reduce invasive properties of breast cancer cells in vitro.
PCL1Inducer of epigenetic dormancyPCL2 and PCL3 are expressed in proliferative tumor state, whereas PCL1 mainly expressed in dormant cells.[81]
PCL2,3Inhibitor of epigenetic dormancy
NR2F1Inducer of epigenetic dormancyNR2F1 is epigenetically upregulated in tumors and induce dormancy by global chromatin repression.[82]
MSK1Inducer of epigenetic dormancyMSK1 epigenetically controls the differentiation of cancer cells and its expression promotes metastatic dormancy.[83]
miR-222/223Inducer of Dmir dormancyPromotes quiescence and drug resistance.[84]
miR-34a, miR-93, miR-200cInducer of Dmir dormancyLoss of DmiRNAs happens during the transition from avascular dormant into angiogenic fast-growing phenotype.[85]
Mir16/19, miR-580, 588 or 190Inducer of Dmir dormancyDmirs govern tumor dormancy, especially miR-190 induce long-lasting dormancy in glioblastomas and osteosarcomas.[17]
miR-100-5pInducer of Dmir dormancymiR-100-5p inhibition induces apoptosis in dormant PC cells and prevents the emergence of castration-resistant PC.[86]
miR-200b/200a/429Inducer of Dmir dormancyExpression of these Dmirs induce tumor cell dormancy and inhibit lung metastasis of BCCs.[87]
miR-125bInducer of Dmir dormancyIts expression favors epithelial phenotype, reduces Wnt-associated stem cell signaling and mesenchymal-associated genes and thus reduce metastasis of BCCs to the bone.[88]
p38 SignalingInducer of stress-induced dormancyp38 Up, ERK down leads to tumor dormancy.[89]
Inhibitor of stress-induced dormancyp38down/ERKup leads to mitogenesis.
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyp38/BiP/PERK axis promotes drug resistance and survival of quiescent cells. BiP up-regulation averts Bax activation.[90]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyp38 induces dormancy by expression of p53 and BHLHB3 while inhibiting c-Jun and FoxM1.[91]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyMKK6 and p38α/β induce survival by regulating nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of ATF6α in dormant cancer cells.[92]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyTGF-β2-MAPK p38α/β-(ERK/p38) (low)- DEC2/SHARP1, p27, ↓CDK4, and dormancy of malignant DTCs.[93]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancy˧MERTK, the ↓ratio of P-Erk1/2 to P-p38, ↑ p27, NR2F1, SOX2, and NANOG, ↑histone H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, G1/G0 arrest and dormancy.[94]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyMKK4 activates MAPK, p38 and JNK, up-regulate p21 and induce cancer cell growth arrest.[95]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyMKK6 activates MAPK and p38.[95]
Inducer of stress-induced dormancyMKK7 activates MAPK and JNK.[96]
Abbreviations: N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 (NDRG1); BMP receptor 2 (BMPR2); indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1)-kynurenine (Kyn)-aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) (IDO1/AhR); bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7); N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 (NDRG1); secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC); high mobility group A1 (HMGA1); polycomb-like proteins 1-3 (PCL1-3); protein kinase-like ER kinase (PERK); urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR); breast-cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1); mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR); Janus-activated kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT); suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS); IL-6 cytokine leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIFR); transforming growth factor β2 (TGF-β2); proline hydroxylase I (P4HA1); Eph receptor A5 (EphA5); histone H2BK; insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5); epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR)-1; insulin-like growth factor type I receptor (IGF-IR); 5′-Ecto-nucleotidase (CD73); endothelial cell–specific molecule 1 (ESM-1); phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase PI3K (PIK3); tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3). The RNA polymerase II transcriptional mediator subunit 12 (MED12). ˧ denotes suppression, ↑ denotes upregulation, ↓ denotes downregulation.
Table
Table 2. Clinical trials targeting persistent DTCs residing in the protective BM niche.
Table 2. Clinical trials targeting persistent DTCs residing in the protective BM niche.
Trial NamePhaseClinicalTrials.gov
Identifier		Anti- Dormancy StrategyTargeting AgentEnd-PointResults
Secondary adjuvant treatment for patients with isolated tumor cells in bone marrowIINCT00248703Addition of docetaxel in the adjuvant treatment to reduces the risk of persistent DTCsdocetaxelDisease-free survival by DTC status; DTC number in BM aspirateDTC eradication in 79% of patients; enhanced metastasis-free survival
CLEVER pilot trial: A phase II pilot trial of hydroxychloroquine, everolimus or the combination for prevention of recurrent breast cancerIINCT03032406 Target persistent DTCs following standard of care treatment in breast cancer patientshydroxychloroquine, everolimus or combinationNumber of adverse events; DTC number in BM aspirateN/A
Zoledronic acid in the treatment of breast cancer with minimal residual disease in the bone marrow (MRD-1)IINCT00172068Inhibitor of bone resorption; interrupt dormancy state of DTCszoledronic acid + calcium/vitamin DReduction of detected tumor cells in BMN/A
A phase Ib/II trial of gedatolisib, hydroxychloroquine or the combination of prevention of recurrent breast cancer (GLACIER)Ib/IICT03400254 Target persistent DTCs following standard of care treatment in breast cancer patientshydroxychloroquine, gedatolisib or combinationDTC number in BM aspirateN/A
A pilot study to evaluate the impact of denosumab on disseminated tumor cells in patients with early-stage breast cancerIINCT01545648 Interrupt immunological dormancy by blocking RNKL overexpression by DTCs which foster the production of chronic inflammatory cytokines.denosumab DTC number in BM aspirateN/A
A pilot study of mobilization and treatment of disseminated tumor cells in men with metastatic prostate cancerINCT02478125Anti-CXCR4 strategy can be used to mobilize and target persistent DTCsburixafor hydrobromide, G-CSF, docetaxel, or combinationCTC number in peripheral blood; HSC number in peripheral blood; PSA response, safetyN/A
A pilot study of the combination of 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for prostate cancer (PCa) with PSA only recurrence after definitive local treatmentIINCT03572387Reprogramming therapy in patients with recurrent PCa based on rising PSA only.Combination of 5-azacitidine and alltrans retinoic acid, and lupronDisease progression-free rate, Percentage of adverse events by grade, time to tumor progression, measurement of dormancy markers TGF-β2, BMP7, BMP4, GAS6, retinoic acid and NR2F1N/A
Effect of trastuzumab on disease-free survival in early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer patients with ERBB2 expressing disseminated tumor cellsIINCT01779050Targeted trastuzumab therapy to eliminate HER2 expressing disseminated tumor cells in BM. doxorubicin, trastuzumab, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, epirubicin, docetaxel, carboplatin, fluorouracil, and combinationElimination of ERBB2-positive DTCs from BM. Improved disease-free survival.N/A

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jahanban-Esfahlan, R.; Seidi, K.; Manjili, M.H.; Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Javaheri, T.; Zare, P. Tumor Cell Dormancy: Threat or Opportunity in the Fight against Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081207

AMA Style

Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Seidi K, Manjili MH, Jahanban-Esfahlan A, Javaheri T, Zare P. Tumor Cell Dormancy: Threat or Opportunity in the Fight against Cancer. Cancers. 2019; 11(8):1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jahanban-Esfahlan, Rana, Khaled Seidi, Masoud H. Manjili, Ali Jahanban-Esfahlan, Tahereh Javaheri, and Peyman Zare. 2019. "Tumor Cell Dormancy: Threat or Opportunity in the Fight against Cancer" Cancers 11, no. 8: 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081207

APA Style

Jahanban-Esfahlan, R., Seidi, K., Manjili, M. H., Jahanban-Esfahlan, A., Javaheri, T., & Zare, P. (2019). Tumor Cell Dormancy: Threat or Opportunity in the Fight against Cancer. Cancers, 11(8), 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop