Next Article in Journal
A Preliminary Study on Machine Learning-Based Evaluation of Static and Dynamic FET-PET for the Detection of Pseudoprogression in Patients with IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma
Previous Article in Journal
Targeted Molecular Therapies in the Treatment of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Are We There Yet?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy

1
Faculty of Nursing, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya Isehara City, Kanagawa 2591193, Japan
2
Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya Isehara City, Kanagawa 2591193, Japan
3
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya Isehara City, Kanagawa 2591193, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3078; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113078
Submission received: 6 October 2020 / Accepted: 16 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing molecular targeted therapy often experience non-negligible adverse events (AEs). Paradoxically, certain AEs are reportedly associated with a good prognosis. We aimed to identify factors predictive of treatment duration and overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC undergoing lenvatinib therapy. This study suggested that better baseline liver function was predictive of longer treatment duration and better prognosis in patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib. Moreover, an AE of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism was associated with a better prognosis in patients receiving lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC. Continuing anticancer therapy with appropriate thyroid hormone replacement may contribute to longer survival.

Abstract

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing molecular targeted therapy often experience non-negligible adverse events (AEs). Paradoxically, certain AEs are reportedly associated with a good prognosis. We aimed to identify factors predictive of treatment duration and overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC undergoing lenvatinib therapy. Forty-six consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib therapy from April 2018 to November 2019 were prospectively followed until November 2019. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for 2–3 months after therapy initiation. The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease. The DCR was 65.2%, with a median survival of 10.2 months. Grade 2/3 hypoalbuminemia resulted in shorter treatment duration. Factors predictive of longer OS were a Child-Pugh score of 5 at baseline and the occurrence of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism. Conversely, Grade 2/3 hypoalbuminemia was associated with a poorer prognosis. An AE of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism was associated with a better prognosis in patients receiving lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC. Continuing anticancer therapy with appropriate thyroid hormone replacement may contribute to longer OS.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. It is also an intractable cancer considering its high rate of recurrence even after curative therapies [2,3]. In particular, vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis greatly decrease survival rates [4].
Currently, sorafenib [5,6] and lenvatinib [7,8] are used as first-line therapies, and regorafenib [9] and ramucirumab [10] are used as second-line therapies for unresectable HCC in Japan. These therapies contribute to improving clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.
Patients with advanced HCC undergoing molecular targeted therapy often experience non-negligible adverse events (AEs) that aggravate prognosis by necessitating a reduction in the scheduled doses or discontinuation of the treatment. Paradoxically, certain AEs are reportedly associated with a good prognosis. For example, patients treated with sorafenib who had a hand/foot skin reaction survived longer than those without this reaction [11]. In addition, any grade hypertension [12] or Grade 2/3 diarrhea [13,14] was associated with longer overall survival (OS).
Lenvatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1–3, fibroblast growth factor receptors 1–4, RET, KIT, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α [7,8]. Lenvatinib was approved as the first-line therapy against advanced HCC in 2018 in Japan. Several baseline variables, such as age, sex, performance status, and tumor stage, were associated with treatment outcomes [7,8]. Multiple factors may affect clinical/treatment outcomes of lenvatinib therapy for HCC. According to previous studies, preserved hepatic function (e.g., lower Child-Pugh scores or modified albumin and bilirubin [mALBI] grades) have a favorable relationship with OS [15]. The number of tumors and the size of the target lesion were associated with improved treatment efficacy [16]. Lower alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) values and early tumor shrinkage contributed to better progression-free survival (PFS) [16].
In lenvatinib therapy for thyroid cancer, AEs such as hypertension [17] and diarrhea [18] were related to a good prognosis. In the post hoc analysis of phase 3 REFLECT trial comparing the efficacy of lenvatinib with that of sorafenib, the occurrence of hypertension, diarrhea, proteinuria, or hypothyroidism was associated with longer OS in patients treated with lenvatinib [19]. However, information on the association of AE occurrence with prognosis in lenvatinib therapy for HCC is limited. Ohki et al. reported that lenvatinib-induced hypothyroidism of Grade ≥2 was an independent predictor of poorer PFS [20], whereas Koizumi et al., found that thyroid dysfunction was associated with better PFS [21]. Therefore, the impact of thyroid-related AE on prognosis is controversial. In this study, we aimed to identify factors, with special attention to AEs, that were predictive of treatment duration and OS in patients with HCC undergoing lenvatinib therapy.

2. Results

2.1. Baseline Patient Characteristics

Overall, 46 patients were enrolled for 19 months. Baseline Patient Characteristics are shown in Table 1. Most patients were men (80%), were aged 75 years and older (52%), had a Child-Pugh score of 5 (63%), and had a Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C (54%) [22]. Eighteen (39%) patients started lenvatinib at a reduced dose because poor tolerability was anticipated.

2.2. Treatment Efficacy

Treatment efficacy was evaluated in 46 patients, including two patients who died of disease progression before the first evaluation. Disease control was achieved in 30 patients (65.2%), including one (2.2%) with complete response (CR), 15 (32.6%) with partial response (PR), and 14 (30.4%) with stable disease (SD) at 2–3 months after the initiation of lenvatinib therapy. The median treatment duration and OS were 7.7 and 10.2 months, respectively.

2.3. Adverse Events

Adverse Events are shown in Table 2. All 46 patients experienced at least one AE. The most common AEs (all grades) during the observation period were fatigue (85%), followed by appetite loss (67%), proteinuria (50%), and weight loss (50%). Grade 3 AEs were observed in 21 patients (46%), with fatigue, anorexia, and proteinuria being most frequent (15%). We observed Grade 1, 2, and 3 hypothyroidism in 10 cases (22%), nine cases (20%), and one case (2%) in the first month, in 15 cases (36%), 11 cases (26%), and no case in the second month, and in 11 cases (28%), 11 cases (28%), and no patients in the third month, respectively. As a result, Grade 2 and 3 hypothyroidism occurred in 12 patients (26%) and one (2%) patient, respectively, during the observation period; however, this AE was well controlled by adjusting the levothyroxine doses according to serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. No AE-related deaths were reported. Fourteen (30%) and 12 (26%) patients required transient or permanent discontinuation of lenvatinib therapy owing to AEs, respectively.

2.4. Factors Associated with Treatment Duration

According to the log-rank analysis, better mALBI grade and hypoalbuminemia grade may contribute to longer treatment duration (Figure 1A,B). However, Cox analysis and sensitivity analysis showed that only Grade 2/3 hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with a shorter treatment duration (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) was adjusted for age = 4.28 (1.28–15.00), Model 2 = 5.01 (1.37–18.35), and Model 4 = 5.65 (1.55–20.53) (Table 3).

2.5. Factors Associated with OS

Among baseline variables, lower mALBI grade (Figure 2A) and a Child-Pugh score of 5 (Figure 2B) were associated with longer OS using log-rank tests. The association of AEs with OS was evaluated using landmark analysis at 3 months after lenvatinib therapy initiation. Interestingly, the patients who had Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism had significantly longer OS than those who had Grade 0/1 hypothyroidism according to the log-rank test and any models in the sensitivity analysis (age-adjusted HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05–0.94, Model 1 = 0.20 (0.04–0.87), Model 2 = 0.19 (0.04–0.87), Model 3 = 0.18 (0.04–0.87), Model 4 = 0.16 (0.04–0.77), Figure 2C). The disease control rate (DCR) was 91% (10/11) in patients with Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism, which was higher than that in those with Grade 0/1 hypothyroidism (71% [20/28]); however, the difference was not significant. In contrast, Grade 2 hypoalbuminemia (age-adjusted HR = 4.96, 95% CI: 1.36–18.12, Model 2 = 5.83 (1.45–23.48), Model 4 = 5.83 (1.54–22.10), Figure 2D) and Grade 2 dysgeusia (age-adjusted HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.27–9.88, Figure 2E) were associated with a poor prognosis (Table 4).

3. Discussion

This study demonstrated that better baseline liver function was predictive of longer treatment duration and better prognosis in patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib. Among lenvatinib-induced AEs, the occurrence of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism was associated with longer OS, whereas Grade 2 hypoalbuminemia and dysgeusia were related to shorter OS.
A lower mALBI grade and Child-Pugh score contributed to longer treatment duration and longer OS in our study. The association of preserved liver function with a better prognosis has been repeatedly reported in the treatment of HCC [23]. Similar results were obtained with lenvatinib therapy; patients with baseline mALBI Grade 1 or a Child-Pugh score of 5 had a longer treatment duration [24,25], better treatment efficacy, and better outcomes [26]. In contrast, unexpectedly, tumor-related factors (e.g., tumor size, extrahepatic metastasis, vascular invasion, or serum AFP values) were not found to be associated with prognosis in this study, which is in agreement with a recent study demonstrating that hepatic reserve function (Child-Pugh score and mALBI grade) but not tumor burden (TNM stage, vascular invasion, and AFP) was predictive of survival in 152 patients who received lenvatinib [15]. Therefore, hepatic function might have a greater impact than tumor burden on outcomes of patients receiving lenvatinib therapy.
Lenvatinib-induced hypothyroidism occurred in 19 (41%) patients, with six (13%) patients having Grade 1, 12 (26%) having Grade 2, and one (2%) having Grade 3. This occurrence rate was higher than the 16–22% of patients with any grade hypothyroidism in phase 2 and 3 studies [7,8]. The reason for this difference is unclear; however, even higher occurrence rates, such as 66%, were reported in a recent real-world study [21]. We found that the presence of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism at month 3 was a better prognostic marker in patients receiving lenvatinib therapy for advanced HCC. The association of lenvatinib-induced hypothyroidism with clinical outcomes is controversial. Koizumi et al. reported similar results [21] to ours, whereas Ohki et al., related this AE to poor survival [20]. Several studies analyzed the impact of therapy-induced hypothyroidism on prognosis. In the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism, which had an incidence as high as 85% [27], was associated with longer PFS [28] and OS [29]. A retrospective study analyzing 538 patients who received TKI for advanced nonthyroidal cancers demonstrated that TKI-induced overt hypothyroidism (TSH ≥ 10 mIU/L, low free thyroxine, or requiring replacement) was significantly associated with longer OS (HR: 0.561) after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cancer type, cancer stage, performance status, and checkpoint inhibitor therapy [30]. Hence, the hypothesis that patients who have hypothyroidism as an AE have a better prognosis than those who do not may apply to patients receiving lenvatinib therapy, as shown in our study.
The pathogenesis of TKI-induced hypothyroidism remains unknown. Supposed mechanisms include destructive thyroiditis, prevention of VEGF binding to normal thyroid cells and/or impairing thyroid blood flow, reduced synthesis of thyroid hormones, inhibition of iodine uptake, RET impairment, and progressive damage to thyroid function [31]. As most TKIs cause thyroid dysfunction, this AE could be a class effect of TKI [31]. Patients who progress to hypothyroidism might be more sensitive to TKI than those who do not. Such patients might manifest a greater response to this drug, which could result in better outcomes. Therefore, continuing TKI therapy with appropriate thyroid hormone replacement could be important in achieving longer survival.
The occurrence of treatment-related Grade 2 hypoalbuminemia at month 3 had a negative impact on treatment duration and OS in our study. There was no study focusing on hypoalbuminemia in patients receiving lenvatinib therapy. Our previous study revealed that Grade 2 hypoalbuminemia was associated with shorter OS in patients receiving sorafenib therapy for advanced HCC [11]. Thus, the serum albumin level, both at baseline and during therapy, is an important predictive marker to predict patients’ outcomes.
Lenvatinib-induced dysgeusia was also associated with a poorer prognosis. The proposed causes of dysgeusia include liver dysfunction, hypothyroidism, and oral mucositis [32]. In our study, the occurrence rate of Grade 2 dysgeusia was 11 cases (28%) at month 3. Moreover, the 11 patients with dysgeusia included three patients with Grade 2/3 oral mucositis, eight with Grade 1/2 hypothyroidism, and eight with a Child-Pugh score of 6 or above at month 3. The lenvatinib-induced dysgeusia may be due to hypothyroidism and liver dysfunction caused by the therapy. More studies are needed to assess these hypotheses.
Our study suggested that we could predict the clinical course based on the occurrence of AEs. Patient education and prophylactic medications should be provided at treatment initiation to appropriately manage AEs to achieve better treatment outcomes.
This study had limitations. We conducted the study in only one institution, and the sample size was relatively small. Because of the small number of patients, we analyzed factors influencing treatment duration and OS using Cox regression models adjusted only for age. Therefore, confounding among variables was unavoidable. However, we added sensitivity analysis and time-dependent Cox regression analysis, which could reduce the risk of cofounding in this study. A multicenter study with a larger number of patients is necessary to verify our results.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics

This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Tokai University Hospital (NO16R-023). All patients provided written informed consent.

4.2. Patients

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib therapy from April 2018 to November 2019. Patients completed surveys at treatment initiation (baseline) and every month. All patients were provided nursing intervention programs, such as education regarding self-monitoring and AE management, and telephone consultations.

4.3. Treatment Procedures

Patients received lenvatinib orally at a dose of 12 mg/day (for bodyweight ≥ 60 kg) or 8 mg/day (for bodyweight < 60 kg). Some patients initiated lenvatinib at a reduced dose owing to poor general condition. Dose reduction or discontinuation owing to AEs was decided by physicians.
Lenvatinib-induced hypothyroidism was treated according to the manuals published by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [33]. We monitored serum levels of TSH, free triiodothyronine, and free thyroxine at baseline and monthly thereafter. A patient was administered levothyroxine sodium at a dose of 25 µg when she/he had overt hypothyroidism with TSH values over 10 µg/mL. The dose of levothyroxine sodium was adjusted depending on the serum TSH values.

4.4. Clinical Evaluation

Treatment efficacy was evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [34] 2–3 months after the initiation of therapy. The DCR was defined as the percentage of patients with CR, PR, and SD. AEs were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology ver. 4.03 [35] at month 3 for landmark analysis and during the follow-up period. Patients were followed up until 19 November 2019, or death.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Cox regression models were used to detect contributing factors for treatment duration and OS. We used landmark analysis [36] to detect the relationship between clinical outcomes and AEs at month 3. Event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test.
Next, Cox regression models were used to detect contributing factors for treatment duration and OS with respect to age-adjusted HR. To determine the effect of hypothyroidism on outcomes, HR and 95% CIs were calculated using Cox regression after adjusting potential confounding factors [37]. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed by altering the models. As entered variables of Models 1, 2, 3, and 4, age, hypothyroidism grade, sex, Child-Pugh score, hypoalbuminemia grade, TNM stage, and BCLC stage were selected based on previous reports on clinical importance to outcomes [19,21,24,38,39]. We consider that the number of variables that could be entered into the model was four at the maximum because of the small sample size. HRs for hypothyroidism grade were adjusted for age, BCLC, and sex in Model 1; age, BCLC, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 2; age, Child-Pugh, and TNM stage in Model 3; and age, TNM stage, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 4. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

This study suggested that better baseline liver function was predictive of longer treatment duration and better prognosis in patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib. Moreover, an AE of Grade 2/3 hypothyroidism was associated with a better prognosis in patients receiving lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC. Continuing anticancer therapy with appropriate thyroid hormone replacement may contribute to longer survival.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and T.K.; methodology, M.S., K.F., and T.K.; software, not applicable; validation, M.S. and T.K.; formal analysis, M.S., K.F., and T.K.; investigation, M.S. and T.K.; resources, M.S. and T.K.; data curation, M.S., H.O., and E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and T.K.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and T.K.; visualization, M.S. and T.K.; supervision, T.K.; project administration, K.S., S.H., K.T., Y.A., K.A., and T.K.; funding acquisition, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Shomura M. was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 17K12265.

Acknowledgments

We express our thanks to all patients who took part in this clinical research. We also thank Tatemichi M and Furuya H for lending their expertise on the statistical analysis. We thank all the nursing staff at the gastroenterology outpatient units at Tokai University Hospital. Finally, we are grateful to the referees for useful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Forner, A.; Reig, M.; Bruix, J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018, 391, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Z.; Zhu, J.Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Current situation and challenge. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2019, 18, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mokdad, A.A.; Singal, A.G.; Marrero, J.A.; Zhu, H.; Yopp, A.C. Vascular invasion and metastasis is predictive of outcome in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage c hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2017, 15, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Llovet, J.M.; Ricci, S.; Mazzaferro, V.; Hilgard, P.; Gane, E.; Blanc, J.F.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Santoro, A.; Raoul, J.L.; Forner, A.; et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cheng, A.L.; Kang, Y.K.; Chen, Z.; Tsao, C.J.; Qin, S.; Kim, J.S.; Luo, R.; Feng, J.; Ye, S.; Yang, T.S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kudo, M.; Finn, R.S.; Qin, S.; Han, K.H.; Ikeda, K.; Piscaglia, F.; Baron, A.; Park, J.W.; Han, G.; Jassem, J.; et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ikeda, K.; Kudo, M.; Kawazoe, S.; Osaki, Y.; Ikeda, M.; Okusaka, T.; Tamai, T.; Suzuki, T.; Hisai, T.; Hayato, S.; et al. Phase 2 study of lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 52, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bruix, J.; Qin, S.; Merle, P.; Granito, A.; Huang, Y.H.; Bodoky, G.; Pracht, M.; Yokosuka, O.; Rosmorduc, O.; Breder, V.; et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhu, A.X.; Kang, Y.K.; Yen, C.J.; Finn, R.S.; Galle, P.R.; Llovet, J.M.; Assenat, E.; Brandi, G.; Pracht, M.; Lim, H.Y.; et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 282–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shomura, M.; Kagawa, T.; Shiraishi, K.; Hirose, S.; Arase, Y.; Koizumi, J.; Mine, T. Skin toxicity predicts efficacy to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Hepatol. 2014, 6, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Estfan, B.; Byrne, M.; Kim, R. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Hypertension as a potential surrogate marker for efficacy. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 36, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Koschny, R.; Gotthardt, D.; Koehler, C.; Jaeger, D.; Stremmel, W.; Ganten, T.M. Diarrhea is a positive outcome predictor for sorafenib treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 2013, 84, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Evans, T.R.J.; Kudo, M.; Finn, R.S.; Han, K.H.; Cheng, A.L.; Ikeda, M.; Kraljevic, S.; Ren, M.; Dutcus, C.E.; Piscaglia, F.; et al. Correction: Urine protein:creatinine ratio vs 24-hour urine protein for proteinuria management: Analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hiraoka, A.; Kumada, T.; Atsukawa, M.; Hirooka, M.; Tsuji, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Takaguchi, K.; Kariyama, K.; Itobayashi, E.; Tajiri, K.; et al. Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-multicenter analysis. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 3719–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Takahashi, A.; Moriguchi, M.; Seko, Y.; Shima, T.; Mitsumoto, Y.; Takashima, H.; Kimura, H.; Fujii, H.; Ishikawa, H.; Takaharu, Y.; et al. Early tumor shrinkage as a predictive factor for outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib: A multicenter analysis. Cancers 2020, 12, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wirth, L.J.; Tahara, M.; Robinson, B.; Francis, S.; Brose, M.S.; Habra, M.A.; Newbold, K.; Kiyota, N.; Dutcus, C.E.; Mathias, E.; et al. Treatment-emergent hypertension and efficacy in the phase 3 Study of (E7080) lenvatinib in differentiated cancer of the thyroid (SELECT). Cancer 2018, 124, 2365–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haddad, R.I.; Schlumberger, M.; Wirth, L.J.; Sherman, E.J.; Shah, M.H.; Robinson, B.; Dutcus, C.E.; Teng, A.; Gianoukakis, A.G.; Sherman, S.I.; et al. Incidence and timing of common adverse events in Lenvatinib-treated patients from the SELECT trial and their association with survival outcomes. Endocrine 2017, 56, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sung, M.W.; Finn, R.S.; Qin, S.; Han, K.; Ikeda, K.; Cheng, A.; Kudo, M.; Tateishi, R.; Ikeda, M.; Breder, V.; et al. Association between overall survival and adverse events with Lenvatinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (REFRECT). J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ohki, T.; Sato, K.; Kondo, M.; Goto, E.; Sato, T.; Kondo, Y.; Akamatsu, M.; Sato, S.; Yoshida, H.; Koike, Y.; et al. Impact of adverse events on the progression-free survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib: A multicenter retrospective study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2020, 7, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Koizumi, Y.; Hirooka, M.; Hiraoka, A.; Ochi, H.; Tanaka, T.; Yukimoto, A.; Imai, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Yoshida, O.; Miyake, T.; et al. Lenvatinib-induced thyroid abnormalities in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Endocr. J. 2019, 66, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Arizumi, T.; Ueshima, K.; Iwanishi, M.; Minami, T.; Chishina, H.; Kono, M.; Takita, M.; Kitai, S.; Inoue, T.; Yada, N.; et al. Validation of Kinki Criteria, a modified substaging system, in patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Dis. 2016, 34, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Villanueva, A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1450–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ueshima, K.; Nishida, N.; Hagiwara, S.; Aoki, T.; Minami, T.; Chishina, H.; Takita, M.; Minami, Y.; Ida, H.; Takenaka, M.; et al. Impact of baseline ALBI grade on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib: A multicenter study. Cancers 2019, 11, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hiraoka, A.; Kumada, T.; Atsukawa, M.; Hirooka, M.; Tsuji, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Takaguchi, K.; Kariyama, K.; Itobayashi, E.; Tajiri, K.; et al. Early relative change in hepatic function with lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 2019, 97, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hiraoka, A.; Kumada, T.; Atsukawa, M.; Hirooka, M.; Tsuji, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Takaguchi, K.; Kariyama, K.; Itobayashi, E.; Tajiri, K.; et al. Important clinical factors in sequential therapy including lenvatinib against unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 2019, 97, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fallahi, P.; Ferrari, S.M.; Vita, R.; Di Domenicantonio, A.; Corrado, A.; Benvenga, S.; Antonelli, A. Thyroid dysfunctions induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2014, 13, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buda-Nowak, A.; Kucharz, J.; Dumnicka, P.; Kuzniewski, M.; Herman, R.M.; Zygulska, A.L.; Kusnierz-Cabala, B. Sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism predicts progression-free survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Med. Oncol. 2017, 34, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vasileiadis, T.; Chrisofos, M.; Safioleas, M.; Kontzoglou, K.; Papazisis, K.; Sdrolia, A. Impact of sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism on survival of patients with metastatic renal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lechner, M.G.; Vyas, C.M.; Hamnvik, O.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Larsen, P.R.; Choueiri, T.K.; Angell, T.E. Hypothyroidism during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is associated with longer survival in patients with advanced nonthyroidal cancers. Thyroid 2018, 28, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Torino, F.; Corsello, S.M.; Longo, R.; Barnabei, A.; Gasparini, G. Hypothyroidism related to tyrosine kinase inhibitors: An emerging toxic effect of targeted therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 6, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Dietrich, E.; Antoniades, K. Molecularly targeted drugs for the treatment of cancer: Oral complications and pathophysiology. Hippokratia 2012, 16, 196–199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Manual for Handling Disorders Due to Adverse Drug Reactions-Hypothyroidism; The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare: Tokyo, Japan, 2009; pp. 8–36. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2006/11/dl/tp1122-1d09.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2020).
  34. Lencioni, R.; Llovet, J.M. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010, 30, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. Available online: http://www.jcog.jp/doctor/tool/CTCAEv4J_20170912_v20_1.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2020).
  36. Anderson, J.R.; Cain, K.C.; Gelber, R.D. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J. Clin. Oncol. 1983, 1, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kabata, D.; Shintani, A. Statistical analysis of observational study. JJSPC 2019, 26, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Guo, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Lin, F.; Wu, H.; Duan, J.; Xiong, Y.; Han, X.; Baklaushev, V.P.; Xiong, S.; et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastases: Prevalence, associated factors, and survival estimation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fuchigami, A.; Imai, Y.; Uchida, Y.; Uchiya, H.; Fujii, Y.; Nakazawa, M.; Ando, S.; Sugawara, K.; Nakayama, N.; Tomiya, T.; et al. Therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma based on the middle-term outcome. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Factors associated with treatment duration. (A) The relationship between modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) grade and treatment duration. (B) The relationship between hypoalbuminemia and treatment duration.
Figure 1. Factors associated with treatment duration. (A) The relationship between modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) grade and treatment duration. (B) The relationship between hypoalbuminemia and treatment duration.
Cancers 12 03078 g001
Figure 2. Factors associated with overall survival. (A) The relationship between modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) grade and overall survival. (B) The relationship between Child-Pugh score and overall survival. (C) The relationship between hypothyroidism and overall survival. (D) The relationship between hypoalbuminemia and overall survival. (E) The relationship between dysgeusia and overall survival.
Figure 2. Factors associated with overall survival. (A) The relationship between modified albumin bilirubin (mALBI) grade and overall survival. (B) The relationship between Child-Pugh score and overall survival. (C) The relationship between hypothyroidism and overall survival. (D) The relationship between hypoalbuminemia and overall survival. (E) The relationship between dysgeusia and overall survival.
Cancers 12 03078 g002
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 46).
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 46).
VariableNumber of Cases (%)
SexMale37 (80)
Female9 (20)
Age, years<7524 (52)
≥7522 (48)
Body mass index≥2137 (80)
<219 (20)
EtiologyHCV14 (30)
HBV7 (15)
Alcoholic7 (15)
NASH4 (9)
unknown14 (30)
Child-Pugh score529 (63)
610 (22)
≥77 (15)
mALBI grade114 (30)
2a11 (24)
2b18 (39)
33 (7)
TNM stageIII18 (39)
IV28 (61)
BCLC
(Kindai criteria)
B12 (4)
B219 (41)
C25 (54)
Tumor size, mm<5027 (59)
≥5019 (41)
Extrahepatic invasionYes20 (43)
Vascular invasionYes9 (20)
Previous curative treatmentYes26 (56)
AFP, ng/mL≥10024 (52)
<10021 (48)
DCP, mAU/mL≥100019 (41)
<100027 (59)
Initial dose of lenvatinib4 mg18 (40)
8 mg15 (33)
12 mg13 (28)
HCV, hepatitis C virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; mALBI grade, modified albumin bilirubin grade; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; BCLC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; DCP, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin.
Table 2. Adverse events (n = 46).
Table 2. Adverse events (n = 46).
Adverse EventsAny GradeGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Any adverse events46 (100)6 (13)19 (41)21 (46)
Fatigue39 (85)23 (50)9 (20)7 (15)
Anorexia31 (67)8 (17)16 (35)7 (15)
Proteinuria23 (50)13 (28)3 (7)7 (15)
Weight loss23 (50)13 (28)9 (20)1 (2)
Hypoalbuminemia21 (46)15 (33)6 (13)0
Skin toxicity a20 (43)10 (22)6 (13)4 (9)
Hypothyroidism19 (41)6 (13)12 (26)1 (2)
Hoarseness18 (39)16 (35)2 (4)0
Nausea & vomiting17 (37)13 (28)2 (4)2 (4)
Diarrhea16 (35)14 (30)1 (2)1 (2)
Abdominal pain16 (35)12 (26)4 (9)0
Dysgeusia13 (28)2 (4)11 (24)0
Hypertension11 (24)5 (11)5 (11)1 (2)
Alopecia11 (24)8 (17)3 (7)0
Data are presented as the number of patients (%) during the follow-up period. a Skin toxicity includes a hand/foot skin reaction and any kind of skin trouble.
Table 3. Baseline demographic and clinical variables and adverse events associated with treatment duration.
Table 3. Baseline demographic and clinical variables and adverse events associated with treatment duration.
VariableAge Adjusted
HR (95% CI)
Multivariate a
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Baseline characteristics
Body mass index ≥ 21 (vs. < 21)0.81 (0.21–1.23)
HCV infection (vs. other etiology)1.67 (0.77–3.65)
Child-Pugh score = 5 (vs. ≥ 6)0.46(0.21–1.00) 0.45 (0.19–1.08)
mALBI = 1/2a (vs. other)0.43 (0.21–0.99)
TNM stage III (vs. IV)1.27 (0.59–2.72) 1.00 (0.39–2.55)1.30 (0.52–3.27)
BCLC B1/2 (vs. C)1.42 (0.66–3.04)1.62 (0.63–4.18)1.35 (0.55–3.30)
Maximum tumor size < 50 mm (vs. ≥ 50 mm) 1.02 (0.48–2.16)
Extrahepatic invasion − (vs. +)1.79 (0.79–4.05)
Vascular invasion − (vs. +)0.55 (0.24–1.27)
Previous curative therapy: Yes (vs. No)1.76 (0.84–3.70)
AFP < 100 (vs. ≥ 100)0.64 (0.30–1.39)
DCP < 1000 (vs. ≥ 1000) 0.56 (0.27–1.20)
Reduced initial dose No (vs. Yes)0.88 (0.41–1.93)
Sex, Male (vs. Female)0.87 (0.35–2.16)0.87 (0.27–2.87)
Adverse events b
Hypoalbuminemia grade 2/3 (vs. grade 0/1) 4.38 (1.28–15.00) 5.01 (1.37–18.35) 5.65 (1.55–20.53)
Hypothyroidism grade 2/3 (vs. grade 0/1) 0.49 (0.18–1.36)0.57 (0.18–1.74)0.44 (0.16–1.23)0.52 (0.17–1.56)0.46 (0.16–1.33)
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HCV, hepatitis C virus; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; DCP, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin. a Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (n = 49). b Association of adverse events with treatment duration was evaluated with landmark analysis at month 3 (n =3 9). HRs for hypothyroidism grade were adjusted for age, BCLC, and sex in Model 1; for age, BCLC, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 2; for age, Child-Pugh score, and TNM stage in Model 3; and for age, TNM stage, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 4.
Table 4. Baseline demographic and clinical variables and adverse events associated with overall survival.
Table 4. Baseline demographic and clinical variables and adverse events associated with overall survival.
VariableAge Adjusted
HR (95% CI)
Multivariate a
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Baseline characteristics
Body mass index ≥ 21 (vs. < 21)0.48 (0.18–1.27)
HCV infection (vs. other etiology)1.67 (0.70–3.96)
Child-Pugh score = 5 (vs. ≥ 6)0.44 (0.19–1.00) 0.30 (0.11–0.82)
mALBI = 1&2a (vs. other)0.44 (0.19–1.04)
TNM stage III (vs. IV)1.05 (0.45–2.46) 0.48(0.16–1.50)0.59 (0.20–1.68)
BCLC B1/2 (vs. C)1.24 (0.54–2.85)1.00 (0.34–2.92)0.76 (0.26–2.22)
Tumor size < 50 mm (vs. ≥ 50 mm)0.90 (0.40–2.06)
Extrahepatic metastasis − (vs. +)1.32 (0.56–3.13)
Vascular invasion − (vs. +)0.58 (0.24–1.40)
Previous curative therapy: Yes (vs. No)1.39 (0.61–3.16)
AFP < 100 (vs. ≥ 100)0.69 (0.30–1.61)
DCP < 1000 (vs. ≥ 1000)0.63 (0.28–1.43)
Reduced initial dose No (vs. Yes)0.55 (0.24–1.26)
Sex, Male (vs. Female)1.06 (0.37–2.99)1.34 (0.36–4.90)
Adverse events b
Dysgeusia grade 2/3 (vs. grade 0/1) 3.55 (1.27–9.88)
Hypoalbuminemia grade 2/3 (vs. grade 0/1)4.96 (1.36–18.12) 5.83 (1.45–23.48) 5.83 (1.54–22.10)
Hypothyroidism grade 2/3 (vs. grade 0/1) 0.21 (0.05–0.94)0.20 (0.04–0.98)0.19 (0.04–0.87)0.18 (0.04–0.87)0.16 (0.04–0.77)
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HCV, hepatitis C virus; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; DCP, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin. a Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (n = 49). b Association of adverse events with treatment duration was evaluated with landmark analysis at month 3 (n = 39). HRs for hypothyroidism grade were adjusted for age, BCLC, and sex in Model 1; for age, BCLC, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 2; for age, Child-Pugh score, and TNM stage in model 3; and for age, TNM stage, and hypoalbuminemia grade in Model 4.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shomura, M.; Okabe, H.; Sato, E.; Fukai, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Hirose, S.; Tsuruya, K.; Arase, Y.; Anzai, K.; Kagawa, T. Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113078

AMA Style

Shomura M, Okabe H, Sato E, Fukai K, Shiraishi K, Hirose S, Tsuruya K, Arase Y, Anzai K, Kagawa T. Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy. Cancers. 2020; 12(11):3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shomura, Masako, Haruka Okabe, Emi Sato, Kota Fukai, Koichi Shiraishi, Shunji Hirose, Kota Tsuruya, Yoshitaka Arase, Kazuya Anzai, and Tatehiro Kagawa. 2020. "Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy" Cancers 12, no. 11: 3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113078

APA Style

Shomura, M., Okabe, H., Sato, E., Fukai, K., Shiraishi, K., Hirose, S., Tsuruya, K., Arase, Y., Anzai, K., & Kagawa, T. (2020). Hypothyroidism Is a Predictive Factor for Better Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Lenvatinib Therapy. Cancers, 12(11), 3078. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop