Next Article in Journal
Recellularized Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Scaffolds as In Vitro Pre-Clinical 3D Model for Drug Screening
Next Article in Special Issue
Added Value of Computed Tomography to Ultrasonography for Assessing LN Metastasis in Preoperative Patients with Thyroid Cancer: Node-by-Node Correlation
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Soft Tissue Sarcoma from Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preoperative Serum Thyroglobulin and Its Correlation with the Burden and Extent of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global RNA Expression and DNA Methylation Patterns in Primary Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer

1
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Genetics, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
2
Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
3
Division of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(3), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030680
Submission received: 4 February 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 13 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer)

Abstract

:
Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is one of the most malignant tumors, with a median survival of only a few months. The tumorigenic processes of this disease have not yet been completely unraveled. Here, we report an mRNA expression and DNA methylation analysis of fourteen primary ATCs. ATCs clustered separately from normal thyroid tissue in unsupervised analyses, both by RNA expression and by DNA methylation. In expression analysis, enrichment of cell-cycle-related genes as well as downregulation of genes related to thyroid function were seen. Furthermore, ATC displayed a global hypomethylation of the genome but with hypermethylation of CpG islands. Notably, several cancer-related genes displayed a correlation between RNA expression and DNA methylation status, including MTOR, NOTCH1, and MAGI1. Furthermore, TSHR and SLC26A7, encoding the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and an iodine receptor highly expressed in normal thyroid, respectively, displayed low expression as well as aberrant gene body DNA methylation. This study is the largest investigation of global DNA methylation in ATC to date. It shows that aberrant DNA methylation is common in ATC and likely contributes to tumorigenesis in this disease. Future explorations of novel treatments should take this into consideration.

1. Introduction

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), accounting for 1–5% of all thyroid malignancies, is one of the most malignant endocrine tumors, with a patient median survival of less than 1 year [1]. ATC may arise de novo or by dedifferentiation of pre-existing well-differentiated thyroid tumors [2,3]. Deciphering its pathogenesis is likely to lead to the development of more effective therapy. However, the underlying epigenomic and transcriptomic changes that drive ATC are still largely unknown.
Gene expression analyses using microarrays have shown upregulation of genes involved in mitotic cell cycle, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and TGF-beta signaling in ATC compared with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and/or normal thyroid tissue. In contrast, genes related to thyroid hormone synthesis and differentiation have been reported to be downregulated [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, all expression studies published so far were conducted on small cohorts, including ≤20 cases. Similarly, all DNA methylation studies done so far on ATC have been performed on very small cohorts of samples. Two have included genome-wide methylation analyses using arrays, each including only two or three ATC cases each [10,11]. Putative tumor suppressor genes that have been reported to display promoter hypermethylation in ATC include PTEN, RAP1GAP, RASAL1, REC8, RASSF1, and RASSF2 [11,12,13,14,15,16], whereas hypomethylation has been observed in NOTCH4, MAP17, and TCL1B. Notably, TSHR and NKX2-1 (previously TTF-1), involved in thyroid functions, have also been reported to be hypermethylated in ATC [17,18].
Matched expression and methylation data may unravel genes that are dysregulated by methylation and that could contribute to tumorigenesis. However, no such studies have hitherto been performed on the genomic level in ATC. Here, we applied RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and genome-wide methylation arrays, including 850,000 CpG sites, on primary ATC tumor samples to identify novel genes that exhibit significant methylation and expression correlation and to further delineate the tumorigenic process of ATC.

2. Results

2.1. Global Expression Analysis Shows Upregulation of Cell Cycle Genes and Downregulation of Thyroid-Related Genes

Expression levels could be ascertained for 15,043 mRNAs in eleven samples (Table S1). Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering showed clear separate clusters for the ATCs and the normal samples (Figure 1a, Figure S1). In the supervised analysis, 2616 genes were upregulated and 1692 genes were downregulated in ATC compared with normal thyroid tissue.
To identify up- or downregulated pathways in ATC, enrichment analysis was performed. Pathways that were upregulated in ATC compared with normal thyroid tissue included cell-cycle-related processes, cytokine interactions, extracellular matrix, and G-protein-associated signaling, whereas downregulated pathways were mainly related to translation, transcription, metabolic processes, and mitochondria (Tables S2 and S3). Notably, “thyroid hormone generation” and “thyroid hormone metabolic process” were also downregulated.
To investigate the expression of genes involved in thyroid differentiation, we focused on the genes used to determine the thyroid differentiation score in PTC according to TCGA [19]. Relatively low expression levels of these genes were seen in the majority of cases compared with normal thyroid tissue (Figure 1b), suggesting dedifferentiation, in line with the result from the GSEA. The exceptions were cases 6 and 12, which showed similar expression levels of these genes as in the normal thyroid tissue samples. Furthermore, we ascertained the BRAF-RAS score according to TCGA. This showed that ten of eleven cases were BRAF-like, two of which had BRAF V600E mutations (#9 and #11) and one of which had an NRAS mutation (#1). One case (#12) was NRAS-like despite not having an NRAS-mutation (Figure 1c).

2.2. Methylation Analysis Shows Global Hypomethylation and Hypermethylation of CpG Islands

Genome-wide methylation was analyzed in ten primary ATC cases and four normal thyroid tissue samples. These clustered separately in unsupervised PCA and hierarchical clustering analyses (Figure 2a and Figure S2). A total of 13,842 CpG probes were differentially methylated between ATC and normal thyroid tissue, with 1993 probes being hypermethylated and 11,849 being hypomethylated (Figure 2b; Tables S4 and S5). Annotation of probes according to their positions showed a slightly higher proportion of hypermethylated probes in gene bodies as well as in shores and CpG islands, whereas more hypomethylated probes were seen in intergenic regions and open sea (Figure 2c,d).

2.3. Combined Expression and Methylation Analyses Identify Genes Potentially Involved in Tumorigenesis

To identify genes that were dysregulated by aberrant DNA methylation, we analyzed the seven cases where both RNA expression and methylation data were available (Table 1). We first looked at differentially methylated probes in promoter regions that were associated with a corresponding change in gene expression. We found a total of 191 hypomethylated probes associated with increased gene expression, including MTOR, NOTCH1, and HIF1A (Table S6). DAVID pathway analysis showed that hypomethylated/overexpressed genes were enriched for cell adhesion, kinases, and cell cycle (Table S7). Among hypermethylated probes in promoter regions, 30 were associated with decreased gene expression (Table S8), including MAGI1. DAVID pathway analysis showed enrichment for genes involved in cell adhesion and transcription (Table S9).
Hypermethylation in gene bodies has been reported to be associated with increased gene expression and vice versa [21]. We found a total of 32 genes with hypermethylation in the gene body and significantly increased expression, including MTOR (Table S10). DAVID pathway analysis showed enrichment for cadherins (Table S11). Furthermore, a total of 226 genes displayed hypomethylation in the gene body and significantly decreased expression, including TSHR and SLC26A7 (Table S12). DAVID pathway analysis did not show enrichment for any cancer-related processes (Table S13).
Methylation of regulatory regions may also affect gene expression. To address this, we performed analysis with ELMER [22,23]. A total of 9390 hypomethylated CpG sites in enhancer regions were found to be associated with increased expression of a nearby gene (Table S14), showing DAVID pathway enrichment for cell-cycle-associated pathways (Table S15). Of the 289 motifs that were found to be enriched for hypomethylation with ELMER, 13 potential top transcriptional regulators were identified, among them TWIST1 (Table S16). Furthermore, 476 hypermethylated CpG sites in enhancer regions were found to be associated with decreased expression of a nearby gene (Table S17) but were not enriched for any cancer-related processes using DAVID (Table S18). A total of 138 motifs were enriched for hypermethylation with ELMER, including 12 potential top transcriptional regulators (Table S19).

3. Discussion

ATC is a rare disease, and this study is the largest on DNA methylation performed so far as well as the first that has correlated data on gene expression and DNA methylation. Although it remains understudied, the overall genomic landscape of ATC is becoming clearer, and this investigation provides additional clues into the tumorigenic processes in this disease.
ATC clustered separately from normal thyroid tissue both by expression and by methylation (Figure 1 and Figure 2), in line with previous studies [4,7,10,11] and showing that the tumor cell percentage was relatively high in the tumor samples. The expression signature of ATC was dominated by cell-cycle-related processes (Table S2), reflecting the high proliferative rate of this malignancy. In regards to DNA methylation, the majority of differentially methylated CpGs in ATC were hypomethylated and in intergenic regions (Figure 2), in line with previous studies [10,11,24]. Global hypomethylation is a common phenomenon in cancer and is believed to be associated with genomic instability [25], agreeing well with the genomic complexity generally seen in ATC [20]. Conversely, most hypermethylated CpG sites were in CpG islands, indicating specific effects on gene expression.
In addition to the high proliferation, dedifferentiation is a hallmark of ATC. We found that genes associated with thyroid function were enriched in the downregulated fraction of genes in ATC compared with normal thyroid tissue (Table S3). In line with this, relatively low expression was seen for the thyroid-related genes previously used to determine thyroid differentiation status of PTC for the majority of cases (Figure 1b). The low number of cases in this study prevented analysis of whether low expression of thyroid-related genes correlated with survival, but it can be noted that the two cases (#6 and #12) that retained normal expression of these genes were among the patients that survived the longest (11 and 15 months, respectively; Table 1). Furthermore, we found relatively low expression of TSHR and SLC26A7, encoding the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and an iodine receptor highly expressed in normal thyroid, respectively, as well as aberrant DNA methylation in their gene bodies (Table S12). Both of these genes have been previously reported to display low expression in ATC, and aberrant methylation has previously been reported for TSHR [5,18]. However, a link between expression and methylation has not been previously reported in primary ATC. Taken together, our data suggest that the role of aberrant DNA methylation in ATC dedifferentiation and loss of normal thyroid cell function should be further explored.
The TCGA study of PTC showed that BRAF and RAS mutations were highly correlated with different expression patterns, denoted by the BRAF-RAS score [19]. In contrast, Landa et al. [4] reported that most ATCs display a BRAF-like gene expression pattern, regardless of mutational status, a finding recently confirmed by Yoo et al. [26]. In line with these studies, we also found that 10/11 ATC cases in our study displayed a BRAF-like expression pattern, including one case with an NRAS mutation (Figure 1c). However, one case (#12) was NRAS-like despite not having a mutation in this gene. This case was also one of two which showed a relatively high thyroid differentiation score (Figure 1b), showing that the correlation between the NRAS-BRAF and thyroid differentiation scores seen in the TCGA study was preserved in our dataset. Notably, we have previously reported that case 12 was also an outlier in terms of mutational pattern, with a very high number of somatic mutations, a different mutational signature, possible microsatellite instability, and occurring in a relatively young patient [20].
Aberrant DNA methylation may result in both upregulation of oncogenes and the silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Examples of both of these mechanisms were seen in this study. Oncogenes that displayed both aberrant methylation and increased expression included MTOR and NOTCH1 (Tables S6 and S10). MTOR encodes a protein kinase promoting cell growth and survival via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling [27], and our data suggest that this pathway could also be involved in ATC cases lacking activating mutations in these genes. Considering that clinical trials are ongoing for mTOR inhibitors in ATC [28], the role of epigenetic activation of MTOR should be further explored in larger ATC cohorts. NOTCH1 signaling is one of the main pathways involved in cell differentiation, and this gene is frequently dysregulated in cancer [29]. Furthermore, HIF1A displayed promoter hypomethylation as well as increased expression in ATC compared with normal thyroid tissue. HIF1A is one of the main players in enabling cells to adapt to hypoxic conditions and has previously been reported to be highly expressed at the protein level in ATC [30,31]. Conversely, MAGI1 displayed promoter methylation as well as decreased expression in ATC compared with normal thyroid tissue (Table S1). MAGI1 has been reported to be a tumor suppressor gene in colorectal, gastric, and renal cancer, and knockdown of this gene has been shown to result in migration and invasion in vitro [32,33,34]. Analysis of aberrant methylation in enhancers identified TWIST1 as a potentially important transcription factor. In cancer, TWIST1 has been shown to be involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition and to promote metastasis [35]. Notably, we have previously reported that TWIST1 is sometimes amplified in primary ATC (#2 in the present study) [20]. Thus, aberrant activation of TWIST1-associated pathways, either by copy number changes or by aberrant methylation, could be a recurrent event in ATC.
Taken together, we report a high degree of aberrant methylation in ATC, suggesting that epigenetic factors contribute to tumorigenesis. The details of this should be further explored in larger patient cohorts.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients

The study included a total of 14 primary cases of ATC previously included in Ravi et al. [20] (Table 1); somatic mutations and gene fusions have been previously reported. Cases were selected based on not having obtained chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment prior to sampling, sample availability, and >30% tumor cells based on the pathologist’s estimate and/or copy number aberrations or mutations detected by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Thirteen of the samples were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and one was a fine-needle aspirate obtained at ATC diagnosis. We also included four normal thyroid tissue samples in the study (Table 1). The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Lund University (No. 2016/51, 1 February 2016).

4.2. Expression Analysis

RNA-seq data from Ravi et al. [20], including 11 ATC cases and four normal thyroid samples (Table 1), were reanalyzed to ascertain mRNA expression. One case (#8) was excluded because of poor sequencing data quality. For #4 and #13, no RNA-seq data was available due to no RNA of sufficiently high quality for RNA-seq being available. Briefly, RNA-seq data were processed using the TCGA mRNA-seq pipeline (https://docs.gdc.cancer.gov/Data/Bioinformatics_Pipelines/Expression_mRNA_Pipeline/#mrna-analysis-pipeline). The sequencing reads were aligned to the human GRCh38 genome assembly using STAR [36], and the read counts for each gene were obtained using HTSeq-count [37]. Genes with count-per-million (CPM) values greater than 1 were defined as expressed genes, and only genes expressed in more than 80% of samples in at least one sample group were used for further analyses. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 [38], and Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted (BH-adjusted) p-values <0.05 were used as the cutoff for identifying differentially expressed genes. Heatmaps were plotted using GENE-E (https://software.broadinstitute.org/GENE-E/) default settings. Functional enrichment analysis was performed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) preranked algorithm [39]. The list of genes for the BRAF-RAS score and thyroid differentiation plots were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) study on PTC [19]. Of the 71 BRS genes in the TCGA study, 67 genes were expressed in our dataset, and the BRAF-RAS score was calculated using these according to [19].

4.3. Methylation Analysis

The purity of extracted DNA from tumor and normal thyroid tissue was quantitated using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and only DNA with A260/280 >1.7 were included. To assess DNA degradation, all samples were run on agarose gel. In total, 10 tumor samples and four normal thyroid tissue samples could be included in the methylation analysis (Table 1). Cases 5, 6, and 10 were excluded because of too poor DNA quality, and #11 was excluded because no DNA was available. Bisulfite conversion of DNA and methylation profiling using Infinium MethylationEPIC Beadchip arrays (Illumina, Eindhoven, Netherlands) were done according to the manufacturer’s instructions at the Human Genotyping Facility of Erasmus MC (Rotterdam, Netherlands). Methylation analysis was performed using the ChAMP package in R(3.5.2) [40]. Briefly, the raw IDAT files obtained from the array were loaded into ChAMP using the minfi method [41]. Single sample dye correction was performed using the Noob method [42]. Probes with cross-hybridizing potential and polymorphic putative sites with minor allele frequency (MAF) of >5% in the European population were excluded [43]. Probes on sex chromosomes were filtered using ChAMP. The filtered data were normalized using BMIQ in the ChAMP package [44]. Methylation data have been deposited in the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE146003.

4.4. Correlation between Methylation and Expression

The normalized methylation BMIQ data were binned into three groups according to β-values: low methylation (≤0.3), moderate methylation (>0.3 but <0.7), and high methylation (≥0.7) [45]. Fisher’s two-sided t-test was performed, with CpG probes with Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values <0.05 and median (Δβ ± 0.3) deemed as statistically significant CpG probes. Filtered CpG probes were annotated as in CpG islands, shores, shelves or open sea as well as annotated as in promoter regions, gene bodies or intergenic regions based on the Infinium MethylationEPIC v1.0 B4 manifest file (http://emea.support.illumina.com/array/array_kits/infinium-methylationepic-beadchip-kit/downloads.html?langsel=/se/). Heatmaps were plotted using GENE-E (https://software.broadinstitute.org/GENE-E/) default settings. Custom Perl scripts were used to correlate CpG sites to expressed genes obtained from DESeq2. Pearson correlations between differentially methylated promoter sites against corresponding fold changes of matched genes were plotted in R. For genes with multiple CpG probes mapping to the promoters, median Δβ value was used.
ELMER (version 2.11.0) supervised analysis model was used to investigate the correlation between gene expression levels and DNA methylation status for enhancers and to identify transcription factor networks regulated by epigenetic modifications [22,23]. Gene expression (FPKM value) and methylation data (BMIQ value) derived from the same sample were used as input (tumor n = 7, normal thyroid tissue n = 4).

5. Conclusions

Aberrant DNA methylation is common in ATC and likely contributes to tumorigenesis. This should be considered in future explorations of novel treatments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/680/s1, Figure S1: Heatmap displaying unsupervised hierarchical clustering of RNA expression data based on all expressed genes from 11 anaplastic thyroid cancers and tissue from four normal thyroids (N1-N4). Tumors and normal samples cluster separately, Figure S2: Heatmap displaying unsupervised hierarchical clustering of DNA methylation data based on 6000 most variable probes from ten anaplastic thyroid cancers and tissue from four normal thyroids (N1-N4). Tumors and normal samples cluster separately, Table S1: List of differentially expressed genes in 11 primary anaplastic thyroid cases compared with tissue from 4 normal thyroids, Table S2: Upregulated pathways in anaplastic thyroid cancer in gene set enrichment analysis, Table S3: Downregulated pathways in anaplastic thyroid cancer in gene set enrichment analysis, Table S4: List of hypermethylated probes (beta values) in 10 cases of primary anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S5: List of hypomethylated probes (beta values) in 10 cases of primary anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S6: Genes displaying increased expression and hypomethylated CpG sites in their promoters in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S7: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying increased expression and hypermethylated CpG sites in their promotors in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S8: Genes displaying decreased expression and hypermethylated CpG sites in their promoters in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S9: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying decreased expression and hypermethylated CpG sites in their promotors in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S10: Genes displaying increased expression and hypermethylated CpG sites in their gene bodies in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S11: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying increased expression and hypermethylated CpG sites in their gene bodies in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S12: Genes displaying decreased expression and hypomethylated CpG sites in their gene bodies in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S13: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying decreased expression and hypomethylated CpG sites in their gene bodies in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S14: Hypomethylated CpG’s in enhancer regions that were associated with increased gene expression in ELMER, Table S15: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying increased expression associated with hypomethylation of a nearby enhancer in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S16: Enriched motifs in enhancers that were hypomethylated in primary anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S17: Hypermethylated CpG’s in enhancer regions that were associated with decreased gene expression in ELMER, Table S18: DAVID pathway analysis of genes displaying decreased expression associated with hypermethylation of a nearby enhancer in anaplastic thyroid cancer, Table S19: Enriched motifs in enhancers that were hypermethylated in primary anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and K.P.; Investigation, N.R. and N.M.; Formal Analysis, N.R. and M.Y., Resources J.W.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, N.R. and K.P.; Writing—Review and Editing, all authors; Supervision, K.P.; Funding Acquisition, N.R. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (No. 2016-01459), the Swedish Cancer Society (No. 2016/497), the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund (No. 2017/38789), and BioCare Lund.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shamik Mitra for help with the methylation analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Roche, A.M.; Fedewa, S.A.; Shi, L.L.; Chen, A.Y. Treatment and survival vary by race/ethnicity in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer. Cancer 2018, 124, 1780–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dong, W.; Nicolson, N.G.; Choi, J.; Barbieri, A.L.; Kunstman, J.W.; Abou Azar, S.; Knight, J.; Bilguvar, K.; Mane, S.M.; Lifton, R.P.; et al. Clonal evolution analysis of paired anaplastic and well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas reveals shared common ancestor. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2018, 57, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Capdevila, J.; Mayor, R.; Mancuso, F.M.; Iglesias, C.; Caratu, G.; Matos, I.; Zafon, C.; Hernando, J.; Petit, A.; Nuciforo, P.; et al. Early evolutionary divergence between papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancers. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Landa, I.; Ibrahimpasic, T.; Boucai, L.; Sinha, R.; Knauf, J.A.; Shah, R.H.; Dogan, S.; Ricarte-Filho, J.C.; Krishnamoorthy, G.P.; Xu, B.; et al. Genomic and transcriptomic hallmarks of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. J. Clin. Invest. 2016, 126, 1052–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Weinberger, P.; Ponny, S.R.; Xu, H.; Bai, S.; Smallridge, R.; Copland, J.; Sharma, A. Cell cycle M-phase genes are highly upregulated in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2017, 27, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Salvatore, G.; Nappi, T.C.; Salerno, P.; Jiang, Y.; Garbi, C.; Ugolini, C.; Miccoli, P.; Basolo, F.; Castellone, M.D.; Cirafici, A.M.; et al. A cell proliferation and chromosomal instability signature in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10148–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hebrant, A.; Dom, G.; Dewaele, M.; Andry, G.; Tresallet, C.; Leteurtre, E.; Dumont, J.E.; Maenhaut, C. mRNA expression in papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Molecular anatomy of a killing switch. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Montero-Conde, C.; Martin-Campos, J.M.; Lerma, E.; Gimenez, G.; Martinez-Guitarte, J.L.; Combalia, N.; Montaner, D.; Matias-Guiu, X.; Dopazo, J.; de Leiva, A.; et al. Molecular profiling related to poor prognosis in thyroid carcinoma. Combining gene expression data and biological information. Oncogene 2008, 27, 1554–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pita, J.M.; Figueiredo, I.F.; Moura, M.M.; Leite, V.; Cavaco, B.M. Cell cycle deregulation and TP53 and RAS mutations are major events in poorly differentiated and undifferentiated thyroid carcinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 2014, 99, E497–E507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rodriguez-Rodero, S.; Fernandez, A.F.; Fernandez-Morera, J.L.; Castro-Santos, P.; Bayon, G.F.; Ferrero, C.; Urdinguio, R.G.; Gonzalez-Marquez, R.; Suarez, C.; Fernandez-Vega, I.; et al. DNA methylation signatures identify biologically distinct thyroid cancer subtypes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 2811–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bisarro Dos Reis, M.; Barros-Filho, M.C.; Marchi, F.A.; Beltrami, C.M.; Kuasne, H.; Pinto, C.A.L.; Ambatipudi, S.; Herceg, Z.; Kowalski, L.P.; Rogatto, S.R. Prognostic classifier based on genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in well-differentiated thyroid tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 4089–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hou, P.; Ji, M.; Xing, M. Association of PTEN gene methylation with genetic alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway in thyroid tumors. Cancer 2008, 113, 2440–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, D.; Yang, C.; Bojdani, E.; Murugan, A.K.; Xing, M. Identification of RASAL1 as a major tumor suppressor gene in thyroid cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 1617–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Schagdarsurengin, U.; Gimm, O.; Hoang-Vu, C.; Dralle, H.; Pfeifer, G.P.; Dammann, R. Frequent epigenetic silencing of the CpG island promoter of RASSF1A in thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3698–3701. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schagdarsurengin, U.; Richter, A.M.; Hornung, J.; Lange, C.; Steinmann, K.; Dammann, R.H. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of RASSF2 in thyroid cancer and functional consequences. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zuo, H.; Gandhi, M.; Edreira, M.M.; Hochbaum, D.; Nimgaonkar, V.L.; Zhang, P.; Dipaola, J.; Evdokimova, V.; Altschuler, D.L.; Nikiforov, Y.E. Downregulation of Rap1GAP through epigenetic silencing and loss of heterozygosity promotes invasion and progression of thyroid tumors. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kondo, T.; Nakazawa, T.; Ma, D.; Niu, D.; Mochizuki, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Nakamura, N.; Yamane, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Katoh, R. Epigenetic silencing of TTF-1/NKX2-1 through DNA hypermethylation and histone H3 modulation in thyroid carcinomas. Lab Invest. 2009, 89, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xing, M.; Usadel, H.; Cohen, Y.; Tokumaru, Y.; Guo, Z.; Westra, W.B.; Tong, B.C.; Tallini, G.; Udelsman, R.; Califano, J.A.; et al. Methylation of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor gene in epithelial thyroid tumors: A marker of malignancy and a cause of gene silencing. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 2316–2321. [Google Scholar]
  19. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 2014, 159, 676–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ravi, N.; Yang, M.; Gretarsson, S.; Jansson, C.; Mylona, N.; Sydow, S.R.; Woodward, E.L.; Ekblad, L.; Wennerberg, J.; Paulsson, K. Identification of targetable lesions in anaplastic thyroid cancer by genome profiling. Cancers 2019, 11, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, X.; Han, H.; De Carvalho, D.D.; Lay, F.D.; Jones, P.A.; Liang, G. Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Silva, T.C.; Coetzee, S.G.; Gull, N.; Yao, L.; Hazelett, D.J.; Noushmehr, H.; Lin, D.C.; Berman, B.P. ELMER v.2: An R/Bioconductor package to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1974–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yao, L.; Shen, H.; Laird, P.W.; Farnham, P.J.; Berman, B.P. Inferring regulatory element landscapes and transcription factor networks from cancer methylomes. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Klein Hesselink, E.N.; Zafon, C.; Villalmanzo, N.; Iglesias, C.; van Hemel, B.M.; Klein Hesselink, M.S.; Montero-Conde, C.; Buj, R.; Mauricio, D.; Peinado, M.A.; et al. Increased global DNA hypomethylation in distant metastatic and dedifferentiated thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 2018, 103, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Torano, E.G.; Petrus, S.; Fernandez, A.F.; Fraga, M.F. Global DNA hypomethylation in cancer: Review of validated methods and clinical significance. Clin. Chem. Lab Med. 2012, 50, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yoo, S.K.; Song, Y.S.; Lee, E.K.; Hwang, J.; Kim, H.H.; Jung, G.; Kim, Y.A.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, S.W.; Won, J.K.; et al. Integrative analysis of genomic and transcriptomic characteristics associated with progression of aggressive thyroid cancer. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hua, H.; Kong, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Luo, T.; Jiang, Y. Targeting mTOR for cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ljubas, J.; Ovesen, T.; Rusan, M. A Systematic Review of Phase II Targeted Therapy Clinical Trials in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bigas, A.; Espinosa, L. The multiple usages of Notch signaling in development, cell differentiation and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 55, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hayashi, Y.; Yokota, A.; Harada, H.; Huang, G. Hypoxia/pseudohypoxia-mediated activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 1510–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Burrows, N.; Resch, J.; Cowen, R.L.; von Wasielewski, R.; Hoang-Vu, C.; West, C.M.; Williams, K.J.; Brabant, G. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha in thyroid carcinomas. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2010, 17, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shao, S.; Hu, S.; Zhang, T. MAGI1 mediates tumor metastasis through c-Myb/miR-520h/MAGI1 signaling pathway in renal cell carcinoma. Apoptosis 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jia, S.; Lu, J.; Qu, T.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, C.; Ji, J. MAGI1 inhibits migration and invasion via blocking MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 29, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zaric, J.; Joseph, J.M.; Tercier, S.; Sengstag, T.; Ponsonnet, L.; Delorenzi, M.; Ruegg, C. Identification of MAGI1 as a tumor-suppressor protein induced by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in colorectal cancer cells. Oncogene 2012, 31, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Qin, Q.; Xu, Y.; He, T.; Qin, C.; Xu, J. Normal and disease-related biological functions of Twist1 and underlying molecular mechanisms. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Subramanian, A.; Tamayo, P.; Mootha, V.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ebert, B.L.; Gillette, M.A.; Paulovich, A.; Pomeroy, S.L.; Golub, T.R.; Lander, E.S.; et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15545–15550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tian, Y.; Morris, T.J.; Webster, A.P.; Yang, Z.; Beck, S.; Feber, A.; Teschendorff, A.E. ChAMP: Updated methylation analysis pipeline for Illumina BeadChips. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3982–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Aryee, M.J.; Jaffe, A.E.; Corrada-Bravo, H.; Ladd-Acosta, C.; Feinberg, A.P.; Hansen, K.D.; Irizarry, R.A. Minfi: A flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Triche, T.J., Jr.; Weisenberger, D.J.; Van Den Berg, D.; Laird, P.W.; Siegmund, K.D. Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. McCartney, D.L.; Walker, R.M.; Morris, S.W.; McIntosh, A.M.; Porteous, D.J.; Evans, K.L. Identification of polymorphic and off-target probe binding sites on the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip. Genom. Data 2016, 9, 22–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Teschendorff, A.E.; Marabita, F.; Lechner, M.; Bartlett, T.; Tegner, J.; Gomez-Cabrero, D.; Beck, S. A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. De Carli, M.M.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Trevisi, L.; Pantic, I.; Brennan, K.J.; Hacker, M.R.; Loudon, H.; Brunst, K.J.; Wright, R.O.; Wright, R.J.; et al. Epigenome-wide cross-tissue predictive modeling and comparison of cord blood and placental methylation in a birth cohort. Epigenomics 2017, 9, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression analysis of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). (a) Unsupervised clustering by principal component analysis of expression data from 11 ATC cases and tissue from four normal thyroids, showing clear clusters. (b) Heatmap displaying relative expression of 15 genes related to thyroid differentiation score in 11 ATC and tissue from four normal thyroids (N1-N4). (c) Heatmap displaying expression of 67 genes in BRAF-RAS score signatures in ATC. Based on their expression, cases were classified as BRAF- like (purple) or NRAS-like (yellow) in the top panel.
Figure 1. Expression analysis of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). (a) Unsupervised clustering by principal component analysis of expression data from 11 ATC cases and tissue from four normal thyroids, showing clear clusters. (b) Heatmap displaying relative expression of 15 genes related to thyroid differentiation score in 11 ATC and tissue from four normal thyroids (N1-N4). (c) Heatmap displaying expression of 67 genes in BRAF-RAS score signatures in ATC. Based on their expression, cases were classified as BRAF- like (purple) or NRAS-like (yellow) in the top panel.
Cancers 12 00680 g001
Figure 2. Methylation analysis of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). (a) Unsupervised clustering by principal component analysis of methylation data from ten ATC cases and tissue from four normal thyroids. (b) Proportions of hypomethylated and hypermethylated differentially methylated probes in ATC. (c) Classification of probes based on their location relative to promoter, body and intergenic region based on Illumina EPIC annotation. (d) Classification of probes based on location relative to CPG island, shore, shelf, and open sea regions based on Illumina EPIC annotation. Background refers to all the probes in the array.
Figure 2. Methylation analysis of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). (a) Unsupervised clustering by principal component analysis of methylation data from ten ATC cases and tissue from four normal thyroids. (b) Proportions of hypomethylated and hypermethylated differentially methylated probes in ATC. (c) Classification of probes based on their location relative to promoter, body and intergenic region based on Illumina EPIC annotation. (d) Classification of probes based on location relative to CPG island, shore, shelf, and open sea regions based on Illumina EPIC annotation. Background refers to all the probes in the array.
Cancers 12 00680 g002
Table 1. Methylation and expression analysis of 14 cases of primary anaplastic thyroid cancer and tissue from 4 normal thyroids (N1-N4).
Table 1. Methylation and expression analysis of 14 cases of primary anaplastic thyroid cancer and tissue from 4 normal thyroids (N1-N4).
Case No. *GenderAgeSurvival (Months)Expression AnalysisMethylation Analysis
1F711YesYes
2M7013YesYes
3F738YesYes
4M6414NoYes
5M644YesNo
6F7211YesNo
7F744YesYes
8F840NoYes
9F861YesYes
10F7018YesNo
11M842YesNo
12M4915YesYes
13M761NoYes
14F637YesYes
N1F62N/AYesYes
N2M64N/AYesYes
N3F40N/AYesYes
N4F56N/AYesYes
* Same as Ravi et al. [20]. N/A, not applicable.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ravi, N.; Yang, M.; Mylona, N.; Wennerberg, J.; Paulsson, K. Global RNA Expression and DNA Methylation Patterns in Primary Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030680

AMA Style

Ravi N, Yang M, Mylona N, Wennerberg J, Paulsson K. Global RNA Expression and DNA Methylation Patterns in Primary Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Cancers. 2020; 12(3):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ravi, Naveen, Minjun Yang, Nektaria Mylona, Johan Wennerberg, and Kajsa Paulsson. 2020. "Global RNA Expression and DNA Methylation Patterns in Primary Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer" Cancers 12, no. 3: 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030680

APA Style

Ravi, N., Yang, M., Mylona, N., Wennerberg, J., & Paulsson, K. (2020). Global RNA Expression and DNA Methylation Patterns in Primary Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Cancers, 12(3), 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop