Next Article in Journal
Dual Targeting of the p38 MAPK-HO-1 Axis and cIAP1/XIAP by Demethoxycurcumin Triggers Caspase-Mediated Apoptotic Cell Death in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
STAT5 is Expressed in CD34+/CD38− Stem Cells and Serves as a Potential Molecular Target in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Analysis of Tumors and Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in 145 Advanced Cancer Patients Annotated by 3 Core Cellular Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
mTOR and STAT3 Pathway Hyper-Activation is Associated with Elevated Interleukin-6 Levels in Patients with Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome: Further Evidence of Lymphoid Lineage Impairment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers12030702
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

STAT3 Mutation Is Associated with STAT3 Activation in CD30+ ALK− ALCL

by
Emma I. Andersson
1,2,3,†,
Oscar Brück
1,2,†,
Till Braun
4,
Susanna Mannisto
5,
Leena Saikko
6,
Sonja Lagström
7,
Pekka Ellonen
7,
Sirpa Leppä
5,
Marco Herling
4,
Panu E. Kovanen
6 and
Satu Mustjoki
1,2,*
1
Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, Department of Hematology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
2
Translational Immunology Research program and Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
3
HUSLAB, Laboratory of Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
4
Department I of Internal Medicine, CMMC, CECAD, CIO-ABCD, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
5
Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
6
Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
7
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2020, 12(3), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030702
Submission received: 18 February 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 13 March 2020 / Published: 16 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting STAT3 and STAT5 in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous, and often aggressive group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Recent advances in the molecular and genetic characterization of PTCLs have helped to delineate differences and similarities between the various subtypes, and the JAK/STAT pathway has been found to play an important oncogenic role. Here, we aimed to characterize the JAK/STAT pathway in PTCL subtypes and investigate whether the activation of the pathway correlates with the frequency of STAT gene mutations. Patient samples from AITL (n = 30), ALCL (n = 21) and PTCL-NOS (n = 12) cases were sequenced for STAT3, STAT5B, JAK1, JAK3, and RHOA mutations using amplicon sequencing and stained immunohistochemically for pSTAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT. We discovered STAT3 mutations in 13% of AITL, 13% of ALK+ ALCL, 38% of ALK− ALCL and 17% of PTCL-NOS cases. However, no STAT5B mutations were found and JAK mutations were only present in ALK- ALCL (15%). Concurrent mutations were found in all subgroups except ALK+ ALCL where STAT3 mutations were always seen alone. High pY-STAT3 expression was observed especially in AITL and ALCL samples. When studying JAK-STAT pathway mutations, pY-STAT3 expression was highest in PTCLs harboring either JAK1 or STAT3 mutations and CD30+ phenotype representing primarily ALK− ALCLs. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of JAK-STAT pathway activation in PTCL.
Keywords:
lymphoma; T-cells; STAT3; RHOA; NGS

1. Introduction

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) form a heterogeneous, uncommon, and often aggressive group of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) representing approximately 10–15% of all new NHL diagnoses [1]. The most prevalent PTLCs are PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), anaplastic lymphoma kinase–negative (ALK− ALCL), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK+ ALCL) [2,3].
Despite generally favorable response rates to chemotherapy, remissions are often not durable, and as such the natural history of PTCL is characterized by relapses and refractory disease. For this reason, upfront hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is often recommended in first remission for patients who are fit and have chemo-sensitive disease [4]. For patients who are not suitable for transplantation, chances of long-term disease control are very limited, with an average progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months [5]. In this setting, optimal therapeutic approaches remain undefined representing an unmet clinical need.
Recent advances in the molecular and genetic characterization of PTCL have helped to delineate differences and similarities between the various subtypes [6]. Several recurrent mutations have been identified in small subsets of patients potentially enabling more accurate disease classification and guide treatment decisions. In AITL, the three most commonly identified genetic lesions occur in the Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 gene (TET2), the Ras homolog gene family, member A (RHOA), and the isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 gene (IDH2). Besides AITL, TET2 mutations can be seen with a high frequency also in PTCL-NOS with a T follicular helper cell phenotype [7]. RHOA, a small GTPase participating in T-cell activation and polarization, has recently been found to have a specific G17V mutation in 68% of AITL cases [8], predominantly in the background of TET2 mutations. The overwhelming majority of IDH2 mutations in PTCL affect the R172 residue [9]. However, STAT3 mutations are relatively uncommon (5%) in AITL [10].
In ALK+ ALCL, the ALK chimeras activate STAT3, thus maintaining the neoplastic phenotype in ALK+ ALCL. In concordance with this, gene expression profiling has revealed a transcriptional gene signature including ALK, TNFRSF8 (CD30), MUC1, Th17-associated genes (IL-17A, IL-17F, and ROR-γ), a small group of immunoregulatory cytokines and receptors regulating STAT3 pathway [11].
A systematic characterization of the genetic alterations driving ALCL was recently undertaken using sequencing strategies. Activating mutations of JAK1 and STAT3 genes were found in 20% of ALK− ALCLs, 38% of which displayed double lesions [12]. As the JAK/STAT pathway has a critical role in hematopoietic development, it is not surprising that it plays, when deregulated, an important oncogenic role in lymphoproliferative malignancies [13]. Many cancers and hematologic malignancies have been associated with the constitutive activation of the STAT family of proteins, which depends on JAK-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation for transcriptional activation [14]. In particular, activated JAK1/STAT3 and JAK2/STAT5 have been shown to facilitate T-cell transformation [15,16]. Activating mutations of JAK1-3 and STAT3-5 have also been found in a subset of NK/T-cell lymphomas, non-hepatosplenic gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma, large granular lymphocytic leukemia and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia [10,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Here, we aimed to further characterize the JAK/STAT pathway in PTCL by investigating whether the activation of the pathway quantified with immunohistochemistry correlates with the frequency of JAK, STAT, and RHOA mutations. In addition, we associated JAK-STAT pathway activation with prognosis and essential clinical and pathological parameters. Finally, we identified novel therapeutic approaches for patients with high STAT3 phosphorylation using Reverse Phase Protein Array and drug sensitivity data from the Broad Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE).

2. Results

2.1. STAT3 Mutations Are Frequent in PTCLs

As STAT3 is constitutively expressed in both AITLs and ALCLs, we sequenced for STAT3 and STAT5B mutations. The entire STAT3 gene and the hotspot SH2-domain of STAT5B were screened by targeted amplicon sequencing in 63 patients with T-cell lymphoma. We discovered that 13% of AITL and ALK+ ALCL cases harbored STAT3 mutations, while 17% of PTCL-NOS cases were found to harbor STAT3 mutations (Table 1). The highest frequency of STAT3 mutations was found in the ALK− ALCL subgroup (38%). The frequency of STAT3 mutations in the entire patient cohort was 19%. While most mutations were found in the SH2-domain of STAT3, we observed one K290T mutation in the coiled coil domain and three patients harbored a P715L mutation in the transactivation domain (Figure 1 and Table S1). The most prevalent mutation type was the P715L mutation and the E616 deletion, which were identified in three patients each. No STAT5B SH2-domain mutations were identified in this cohort. JAK1 mutations were found in two ALK− ALCL patients (15%). Both mutations (G902R and G1097C) were seen in the protein tyrosine kinase domain of JAK1. No JAK3 mutations were detected in any subgroup.
As RHOA mutations are highly prevalent in AITL and have been found to cause activation of the MAPK/PI3K/AKT pathway and T cell receptor signaling, the hotspot mutation G17V was also screened [23,24]. The results showed that these mutations were frequent in AITL (70%) and PTCL-NOS (17%) but remained absent in ALCLs (Table 1). Some cases harbored both STAT3 and RHOA mutations (10%). DNA samples from nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma with abundant follicular T helper cells (n = 13), were also available for STAT3/STAT5B and RHOA screening but no mutations were detected in these samples.

2.2. STAT3 Phosphorylation Levels Are Highest in ALK+ and ALK− ALCL Cases

To characterize JAK-STAT pathway activation, we stained for pY-STAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT in AITL (n = 29), ALCL (n = 20) and PTCL-NOS (n = 12) patients and control lymph nodes (n = 4) using immunohistochemistry (Supplementary Figure S1). The differences between disease groups were significant notably for phosphorylation of pY-STAT3 and recapitulated well previous reports [25]. Further post-hoc analysis showed that pY-STAT3 was shown to be more frequently phosphorylated in AITL (mean = 43.7%) and ALCL (ALK−: mean = 62.3%, ALK+: mean = 79.7%) patients compared to control lymph nodes (mean 12.6%; Figure 2).
MAPK phosphorylation was significantly elevated in AITL patients (mean 10.5%) followed by ALK− ALCL (mean 6.8%) and PTCL NOS (5.2%) when compared to control lymph node (Figure 2). No significant difference in pAKT levels between PTCL patients and control lymph nodes was observed.
To confirm the findings and study STAT3 activation in other T cell malignancies, we measured STAT3 and pY-STAT3 levels by Western blotting in ALCL, acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKT), T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGL), and PTCL cell lines (Figure 3). We confirmed high phosphorylation of pY-STAT3 (Tyr705) in ALCL but not in other T cell malignancies. Total STAT3 was most prominent in PTCL, ALCL and T-ALL cell lines. High JAK3 phosphorylation was observed in SupM2, Karpas299 and TLRB1 (ALCL) as well as NKL (NKT) cell lines and was not associated with pY-STAT3 phosphorylation.
To further investigate the association of protein expression to transcriptome data, we compared the JAK1, JAK3, AKT, and MAPK RNA level expression with STAT3 RNA level expression and pSTAT3Tyr705 phosphorylation defined with reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) from the CCLE database (Figure S2). Both STAT3 expression (535 vs. 198 CPM p = 0.003, t-test) and phosphorylation (3.6 vs. −0.10 RPPA unit, p < 0.001) were observed to be superior in ALCL than non-ALCL malignant T-cells as shown in Figure 2. Higher JAK3 expression was noted in ALCL over non-ALCL lines (364 vs. 53 CPM, p < 0.001), and correlated with STAT3 expression (r = 0.60, p = 0.01). Moreover, higher MAPK expression was detected in ALCL over non-ALCL cell lines (127 vs. 68, p = 0.05), which correlated with STAT3 expression (r = 0.65, p = 0.006). No correlation between STAT3 and JAK1 or AKT expression was observed.

2.3. STAT3 Phosphorylation Is Associated with JAK1/STAT3 Mutation Status in CD30+ ALK− ALCLs

Next, we studied whether STAT3 mutations would be associated with STAT3, MAPK, and AKT phosphorylation. No association between STAT3 mutation status and pY-STAT3, pMAPK, or pAKT (%) expression was noted when studying all PTCL subtypes (Figure 4A). No association with pY-STAT3 phosphorylation was noted even after adjusting with tumor proportion (mean pSTAT3 77% vs. 66% in STAT3 mutated vs. non-mutated PTCLs). Most of the mutations were noted in relatively low variant allele frequencies (VAF 5–9%), which might in part explain the lack of correlation. Further evidence for this observation was found from cell line data, as the four ALCL cell lines in Figure 2 exhibit high pY-STAT3 phosphorylation but only one of the cell lines harbored a JAK/STAT mutation (Table S1). The TLBR1 cell line represents ALK− ALCL and harbors a known activating STAT3 missense mutation S614R in the SH2 domain [26]. The other ALCL cell lines expressed ALK, which explains the constitutive STAT3 activation. Both T-ALL cell lines MOLT4 and Jurkat also harbor missense STAT3/5B mutations but conversely, the cell lines did not exhibit any pY-STAT3 phosphorylation. This could be explained by the mutations being localized elsewhere than in the activating SH2-domain.
Some PTCL cases harbored both STAT3 and RHOA mutations (8%). Our results showed that the MAPK phosphorylation degree was higher in patients with RHOA mutations than patients without RHOA mutations (RHOA-positive mean = 12.4% vs. RHOA-negative mean 5.7%, p = 0.005, t-test; Figure 4B). Yet, RHOA mutation was not observed to be associated with STAT3 or AKT phosphorylation.
Phosphorylated STAT3 has been shown to induce CD30 expression in PTCL [27]. In addition, STAT3 mutations are more frequent in CD30+ than CD30− T-cell lymphomas [28]. Therefore, we sought to investigate the interaction between mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway, CD30 phenotype and pY-STAT3 phosphorylation. Positive CD30 tumor phenotype was associated with higher STAT3 and AKT phosphorylation, but not with pMAPK (Figure S3A). Interestingly, pSTAT3 expression was highest in samples with CD30+ tumors and simultaneous mutation in STAT3 or JAK1 (Figure 4C). This phenotype was represented primarily by the ALK− ALCL subtype (p < 0.001, chi2 test, Figure 4D), and their pSTAT3 expression (mean 68.7%) to stand above the mean of ALK− (62.3%) but below ALK+ ALCL (79.7%). We observed that 50% (6/12) of CD30+ ALK− ALCLs harbored a mutation in JAK1 or STAT3. Higher JAK1/STAT3 VAF trended for higher pY-STAT3 phosphorylation but the result remained non-significant possibly due to sample size (81.3% vs. 61.1% mean pSTAT3 expression in tumors with high (n = 4) vs. low (n = 4) JAK1/STAT3 VAF p = 0.22, t-test). Unexpectedly, lowest STAT3 phosphorylation was observed in CD30− patients with a STAT3 gene mutation. Interestingly, all three in-frame E616 deletions were found in CD30− AITL cases.
EBV status has been shown to be associated with STAT3 activation in B cell lymphomas [29]. No associations between STAT3, MAPK, and AKT phosphorylation and EBV+ tumors could be observed in our PTCL cohort (Figure S3B).
As fixation rate differs in samples of various origin and size, we investigated their association with STAT3, MAPK, and AKT phosphorylation. The sample cohort included 9 biopsy samples and 52 excised tumors. Biopsy samples were associated with higher pY-STAT3 but not with MAPK or AKT phosphorylation (Figure S4A). Moreover, correlation between pY-STAT3 and sample size remained non-significant (Figure S4B). Therefore, we hypothesize the difference to be due primarily to biological rather than technical reasons. Except for four samples, the sample cohort consisted of lymph node tissue samples. AKT phosphorylation was higher in lymph node samples, while no difference was observed between pY-STAT3 and MAPK phosphorylation levels (Figure S4B).
To further elucidate the spatial localization of STAT3 phosphorylation, 6 T-cell lymphoma samples (5 AITL, and 1 ALCL) and 2 NLPHL samples were stained for pY-STAT3, PD1, CD4, and CD8 using multiplex immunohistochemistry. Of the 5 AITL samples, two harbored STAT3 mutations at 5% and 7% VAF, respectively. We found that the staining pattern or level of pY-STAT3 phosphorylation was not associated with STAT3 mutation status (Figure 5).

2.4. High pY-STAT3 Expression Is Associated with CD3− CD5− CD7− CD30+ Immunophenotype Common to ALCL

To understand the association of JAK-STAT signaling pathway activity with clinical determinants, we combined pY-STAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT proportion defined by IHC with information on PTCL disease histology, stage, peripheral blood lactate dehydrogenase (LD) level at diagnosis, survival status, STAT3 and RHOA mutation status (Figure 6). We noted that pY-STAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT expression did not correlate with each other. High pY-STAT3 expression was noted to be associated with ALCL histology as presented before (Figure 2). No association with survival status (p = 0.17, t-test), disease stage (p = 0.40, one-way ANOVA), LD level (r = -0.13, p = 0.31, Pearson correlation), STAT3 (p = 0.56, t-test) or RHOA mutation status (p = 0.11, t-test) was noted.
To correlate the expression of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway with immunohistochemical and serological factors of disease pathology, we investigated EBV seropositivity, and expression of immunophenotype markers as defined with IHC (Figure 6). Lower pY-STAT3 expression was associated with negative CD3 (37.7% and 75.4% mean pSTAT3 expression, p < 0.001, t-test), CD5 (42.8% and 68.4%, p = 0.03, t-test), CD7 (45.2% and 64.6%, p = 0.01) and positive CD30 phenotype (Figure S4A) designating ALCL immunophenotype as reported in Figure 2 [30]. No association with EBV seropositivity (Figure S4B), CD4 (p = 0.86, t-test) or CD8 (p = 0.35, t-test) immunophenotype nor MIB proliferation index (r = 0.20, p = 0.19, Pearson correlation) was noted.

2.5. Novel Potential Inhibitors of STAT3 Activation

In myeloproliferative neoplasms the JAK-STAT signaling pathway can be inhibited with the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and in rheumatoid arthritis with less selective JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib and baricitinib [31]. Several other pharmacological compounds affecting the JAK-STAT pathway are currently investigated in clinical trials [31]. We hypothesized that drugs investigated for other indications might induce differential sensitivity in cancer cell lines with active JAK-STAT signaling. By comparing cytotoxicity measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of 265 investigational and accepted compounds in pSTAT3 high (n = 27) and low (n = 583) cancer cell lines reported in the Sanger GDSC and CCLE databases respectively, we identified the JAK-STAT inhibitor ruxolitinib to be more potent in pSTAT3 high cell lines (Figure 7). Interestingly, we discovered also the cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762, the poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor talazoparib and the nucleoside analog gemcitabine to exhibit most sensitivity in pSTAT3 cell lines.

3. Discussion

PTCL patients face unfavorable prognosis as chemotherapy results in poor 5-year overall survival rates [32]. Targeted treatment options only exist for ALK+ ALCL, but are urgently needed for other PTCL entities. Using targeted sequencing, we demonstrated that STAT3 alterations are prevalent in all PTCL subgroups. We discovered that 13% of AITL and ALK+ ALCL cases and 17% of PTCL-NOS cases harbored STAT3 mutations. The highest prevalence of STAT3 mutations was seen in ALK− ALCL (38%). The mutations were found mostly in the SH2-domain of STAT3 but also in the coiled coil (K290T) and transactivation domains (P715L). While we observed no association between overall STAT3 mutation and pY-STAT3 phosphorylation, pY-STAT3 phosphorylation was most elevated in PTCL patients with combined CD30+ tumor phenotype and mutations in either STAT3 or JAK1 representing primarily ALK− ALCLs and suggesting heterogenous mechanisms of STAT3 activation. Unexpectedly, PTCLs with CD30- phenotype and STAT3 mutation were associated with lowest pY-STAT3 phosphorylation. As CD30 transcription is regulated by pSTAT3, the result might be explained by non-activating mutations or interference in the JAK-STAT pathway [27].
JAK/STAT mutations have been previously reported in PTCL-NOS, ALCL, and AITL [12,33,34], supporting the results of our study. The frequency of JAK/STAT mutations in different cohorts of PTCL has been reported to be around 20% which compares well to the mutation frequency seen in this study. In the whole cohort one of the most prevalent STAT3 mutation was an in-frame deletion of E616, which was identified in three AITL patients. The E616 deletion has been shown to induce myeloid malignancy in a mouse bone marrow transplantation model [19]. The mutation has been observed previously in AITL, but also in adult T-cell lymphoma [10,35]. The STAT3 mutation P715L observed in two ALK− ALCLs and one PTCL-NOS case has been observed in NKTL previously [36].
Some AITL and PTCL-NOS cases harbored concurrent STAT3 and RHOA mutations (3/30 AITL and 1/12 PTCL-NOS). The incidence of RHOA mutations in our AITL cohort was 70%, which is somewhat higher than the incidence seen in previous AITL cohorts (68% and 53%) [8,23]. In PTCL-NOS the mutation incidence was 17% (2/12). Our results also showed that the MAPK phosphorylation degree correlated with RHOA mutations in our PTCL cohort.
Although this study included limited number of patients representing various PTCLs subtypes, our results suggest that pY-STAT3 is frequently constitutively phosphorylated in PTCL, especially in ALCLs and AITLs, but this was associated with STAT3 mutations in only a fraction of PTCL samples. Previous studies have reported mechanisms underlying the constitutive activation of STAT3 independent of STAT3 mutations. Gain-of–function mutations involving JAK genes have been implicated in activating STAT3 and contributing to the pathogenesis of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [37,38]. Various cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-10, and IL-11) that are released into the microenvironment by tumor cells have also been shown to activate STAT3 [39]. Another mechanism of STAT3 activation is possible through the deregulation of suppressors of the JAK/STAT pathway such as SOCS3 [40] leading to constitutive STAT activation and oncogenesis. In addition, further studies are needed to combine any association with JAK-STAT pathway activation and expression of essential transcription factors such as GATA3 and Tbet, which define new subclasses of PTCL-NOS with prognostic consequences, where GATA3 signatures are associated with worse prognosis [41,42].
In our cohort high pSTAT3 expression correlated with the CD3− CD5− CD7− CD30+ immunophenotype typical for ALCL. No association with neither immunophenotype markers nor essential clinical variables such as survival status, disease stage, MIB proliferation index or LD level was seen.
By comparing cytotoxicity measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of 265 investigational and accepted compounds in pSTAT3 high and low cancer cell lines, we identified novel potential inhibitors of STAT3 activation. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib was among the top candidates. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor approved by the FDA for myeloproliferative neoplasms, is being studied in relapsed B-cell lymphoma and PTCL (NCT01431209).
Among compounds exhibiting most sensitivity in pSTAT3 high cell lines were the cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1/2 inhibitor AZD7762, the poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor talazoparib, and the nucleoside analog gemcitabine. In phase II studies, gemcitabine monotherapy has shown activity against T-cell lymphomas. Zinzani et al. reported a 70% response rate in a phase II study of 44 pretreated patients with mycosis fungoides or cutaneous PTCL-unspecified [43]. In another phase II study, gemcitabine was given in combination with romidepsin to relapsed/refractory PTCL patients but the synergy observed in preclinical phase did not improve clinical outcomes [44]. Moreover, gemcitabine has been tested in combination with cisplatin and methylprednisolone as both upfront treatment and in relapsed/refractory PTCL, but did not significantly improve OS [45,46].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Cell Lines

Samples from 63 patients with PTCL were collected. Of these samples 30 were AITL, 12 PTCL-NOS and 21 ALCL (13 ALK− and 8 ALK+). Four control samples from normal lymph nodes were also collected. The study was undertaken in compliance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the ethics committee in the Helsinki University Hospital (Finland). As the samples studied were older diagnostic samples, the ethics committee required no written informed consent (TEO 5326/04/046/06, Valvira 9115/05.01.00.06/2011, HUS 302/E0/2006, HUS/1230/2017). The clinical and pathological characteristics of our study objects are summarized in Table S2.

4.2. Cell Lines and Cell Culture Conditions

The T-cell lines were cultured in RMPI-1640 medium including L-glutamine (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% (L82, Karpas299, TLRB1, Molt4, Jurkat, and NKL cell line) or 20% (SupM2, MTA, MOTN1, and SMZ1 cell line) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and Penicillin/Streptomycin (100 U/l, Gibco). IL2 (10ng/mL, MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) was added for culturing of TLRB1 and NKL cells. Suspension cells were maintained at a density of 2.0–8.0 × 105. Culturing was done in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 with 90% humidity.

4.3. Sample Preparation

According to standard clinical procedure, fresh tissue samples consisting mostly of lymph nodes (LN) were fixated in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE) in the central pathology laboratory of Helsinki University Hospital (HUCH), Finland. Consequently, we cut 3.5 µm whole-tissue sections on Superfrost objective slides (Kindler O Gmbh, Freiburg, Germany).

4.4. DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from FFPE tissue blocks. Ten 10 μm sections were cut with standard microtome (Leica SM2000 R Sliding Microtome, Wetzlar, Germany) using disposable blades. Excess paraffin was trimmed off and the sections were collected into sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes. The sections were then deparaffinized with three pre-warmed (55 C) xylene washes followed by 95%, 75%, and 50% ethanol rinses. The tissue pellets were dried briefly at 37 °C to remove traces of ethanol. The pellets were then digested with 20 µL proteinase K (20 mg/mL proteinase K, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, (Mannheim, Germany) and 180 µL digestion buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 50 mM NaCl, and 0.5% SDS). Samples were incubated at 55 °C with mild agitation for 3 to 72 h. Fresh Proteinase K was added every 24 h followed by heat inactivation at 90 °C for 1 h after the tissue had been fully dissolved. For phenol-chloroform extraction, equal volume of phenol (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) was added and vortexed. After spinning for 3 min at 14,000 rpm, the aqueous layer was transferred to a new tube. Then, an equal volume of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:25:1) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added, and the solution was vortexed and spun for 5 min at 14,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge. The aqueous layer was again transferred to a new tube and treated with RNase A at 100 μg/mL for 1 h at 37 °C. To remove any remaining RNase A phenol and phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol steps were repeated. The aqueous layer was transferred to a new tube and the DNA was precipitated with 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 1 volume of isopropanol. After thorough mixing, the solution was placed in a freezer for 30 min then spun at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was washed with 1 mL 70% cold ethanol and spun at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully discarded, and the pellet dried and finally suspended with 50 µL dH2O.

4.5. Targeted Deep Amplicon Sequencing

Locus-specific primers were designed for STAT3, STAT5B, JAK1, JAK3, and RHOA mutation hotspots using Primer3 with user-defined parameters (http://primer3.wi.mit.edu/). After designing the locus-specific primer sequences (Table S3), sequence tails corresponding to the Illumina adapter sequences, were added to the 5′ end of the forward and reverse locus-specific primers, respectively. All oligonucleotides were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Deep targeted amplicon sequencing of known recurrent somatic mutations in the genes STAT3, STAT5B, JAK1, JAK3, and RHOA was performed with the Illumina MiSeq platform (San Diego, CA, USA)as previously described [47]. The data were analyzed with a bioinformatics pipeline, which is based on calling of variants with certain count/frequency of reads and filtering out false positives using the estimated error rate and quality data of amplicon reads.

4.6. Immunohistochemistry

4.6.1. Single Color Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated in graded ethanol series and then subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval in Tris-HCl (10 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 25 min; for Phospho-MAPK and Phospho-AKT) or in EDTA buffer (10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 20 min; for Phospho-Stat3 and -5) in a Pre-Treatment module (DAKO/Agilent Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were stained using LabVision autostainer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA). The endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with Peroxidase-Blocking Solution (Dako/Agilent Tehnologies). The samples were treated with primary antibody for 1 h at RT. The antibodies used were rabbit monoclonal antibodies from Cell Signaling (Leiden, the Netherlands): clone Tyr705 for pY-STAT3 (1:300), clone Thr202/Tyr204 for Phospho-p44/42MAPK (1:300) and Thr450 for Phospho-AKT (1:100). BrightVision polymerisation technology was utilized to prepare polymeric HRP-linker antibody conjugates (ImmunoLogic, Duiven, the Netherlands) and 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as chromogen. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Dako/Agilent Tehnologies) and mounted with Eukitt (Honeywell Fluka, Frankfurt, Germany).
Protein expression was defined by visual examination. Five representative 400×-magnified high-power field-of-view (FOV) were selected, and protein expression (%) was estimated as the proportion of positive cells of 100 cells analyzed by FOV. Finally, the mean proportion of positive cells was calculated and used for statistical analyses.

4.6.2. Multiplex Immunohistochemistry

All phases were performed in room temperature (if not otherwise specified) and protein blocking as well as antibody incubations were performed in a humid chamber. The slides were washed with 0.1% Tween-20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted in 10 mM Tris-HCL buffered saline pH 7.4 (TBS) three times after peroxide block, each antibody staining, and fluorochrome reaction. Antibodies were tested with normal lymph node and pY-STAT3 was validated with tissue samples from a patient with large granular lymphocyte leukemia (Figure S5).
The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated with graded series of ethanol and H2O. HIER was performed in 10 mM Tris-HCl - 1 mM EDTA buffer (pH 9) in +99 °C for 20 min (PT Module, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peroxide activity was then blocked in 0.9% H2O2 solution for 15 min, and 10% normal goat serum was subsequently applied (TBS-NGS) for 15 min. We applied the primary antibody anti-PD1 (1:5000; clone PDCD1; LsBio, Seattle, WA, USA) diluted in TBS-NGS for 1 h 45 min, and then anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (Immunologic) diluted 1:2 in washing buffer for 45 min. Then, we applied tyramide signal amplification (TSA) Alexa Fluor 488 (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA) diluted 1:50 in TBS on the slides for 10 min. In order to multiplex antibodies, we denatured the primary antibody and quenched the enzymatic activity of HRP by repeating HIER as well as performing peroxide and protein block similarly as above. We applied the primary antibody against pY-STAT3 (Tyr705; 1:2500; clone D3A7; CellSignaling) overnight in +4 °C, anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody diluted 1:5 in washing buffer for 45 min, and TSA Alexa Fluor 555 (PerkinElmer) for 10 min. We repeated HIER, peroxide block and protein block as above. Next, we applied anti-CD4 (1:150; clone EPR6855; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) diluted in TBS-NGS for 3 h and later AlexaFluor647-conjugated secondary antibody (1:300; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Hoechst 33,342 (1 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) counterstain diluted in washing buffer for 45 min. Finally, we applied ProLong Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to mount the slides.
The tissue slides were scanned with 20x magnification with the Panoramic P250 Flash II whole slide scanner (3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary). We used DAPI, FITC, Cy3, and Cy5 filters and visually-optimized exposure times.

4.7. Western Blot

Immunoblots were performed on whole-cell protein lysates according to standard techniques. All primary antibodies (pJAK3Tyr980/981, clone D44E3; JAK3, clone D7B12; pY-STAT3Tyr705, clone D3A7; STAT3, clone 124H6; beta-ACTIN, clone 13E5) were ordered from Cell Signaling Technology and used at 1:1000 dilutions. Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit, both from Dianova, were used as secondary HRP-coupled antibodies in a 1:5000 dilution. Development of the immunoblots was performed by using Western Bright ECL (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The original blots and densitometry readings of each band is available in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S6 and Table S4).

4.8. CCLE and DepMap Data

All CCLE pre-processed data were downloaded from the CCLE data portal (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle/data). RPPA data dated 3 October2018, RNA-seq gene count data dated 29 September 2018, cell line annotation dated 26 December 2018, and mutation data dated 18 July 2018 were used. Gene counts were converted to CPM values using the edgeR and the TMM normalization method without log transformation. The cut-off for high vs. low STAT3 phosphorylation was set to pSTAT3Tyr705 = 1 (RPPA unit) based on the shape of the pSTAT3Tyr705 frequency histogram.
Area under the curve (AUC) drug sensitivity data annotated as “Sanger GDSC v17.3” and dated March 2018 were downloaded from the Cancer Dependency Map portal (https://depmap.org/portal/download/). Drugs not characterized in both pSTAT3 high and low cell line groups were removed from the analysis. Cell lines with no pSTAT3 RPPA data were removed from the analysis.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Comparison of continuous variables between two groups was computed with unpaired t-test and between multiple groups with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc correction between disease groups and healthy controls.
Overall survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Patients alive at the last follow-up date were censored. The log-rank test was used to compute Cox proportional-hazards.
Differential drug sensitivity was computed using t-test between pSTAT3 high (n = 27) and low (n = 583) cancer cell lines. The fold change in drug sensitivity was defined as the mean AUC ratio in pSTAT3 high-to-low cell lines. Drugs with a fold change (FC) less than 1.0 are more sensitive in pSTAT3 high cell lines.
R 3.5.1. [48] and Prism 6.0 was used for statistical analyses. R packages edgeR 3.24.0, forestplot 1.7.2, survminer 0.4.3, ggplot2 3.2.1, and ComplexHeatmap 2.3.2 were used.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study discovered that pY-STAT3 phosphorylation was associated with both ALK+ ALCLs and JAK1/STAT3 mutated CD30+ ALK− ALCLs suggesting a subgroup potentially benefitting of JAK/STAT targeted therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/702/s1, Figure S1: pMAPK, pAKT and pSTAT3 staining of PTCLs, Figure S2: STAT3 expression correlation with JAK1, JAK3, AKT and MAPK expression in T-cell neoplasia cell lines from the CCLE dataset, Figure S3: Association of STAT3, MAPK and AKT phosphorylation with CD30 phenotype and EBV status, Figure S4: Association of STAT3, MAPK and AKT phosphorylation with sample type and organ origin, Figure S5: Multiplex immunohistochemistry staining of pSTAT3Tyr705 in CD8+ LGL-leukemia as a positive control stain for pSTAT3 antibody, Figure S6: Full western blot of p-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, p-JAK3 (Tyr980/981), and JAK3 in T cell malignancy cell lines, Table S1: Cell lines and JAK/STAT mutation status, Table S2: Clinical and pathological characteristics of PTCL patients, Table S3: Locus-specific primers for STAT3 and STAT5B exons and RHOA G17V mutation hotspot, Table S4: Densitometry readings of Western blot stainings.

Author Contributions

conceptualization, S.M. (Satu Mustjoki), P.E.K., O.B. and E.I.A.; methodology, L.S., S.L. (Sonja Lagström) and P.E.; validation, E.I.A., T.B. and O.B.; formal analysis, E.I.A. and O.B.; data curation, S.M. (Susanna Mannisto); writing—original draft preparation, E.I.A. and O.B.; writing—review and editing, S.M. (Satu Mustjoki), P.E.K., S.L. (Sirpa Leppä) and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Academy of Finland under the frame of ERA PerMed (JAKSTAT-TARGET consortium) and Terva program (Heal-Art consortium), European Research council (M-IMM project), the Finnish Cancer Societies, Finnish Cancer Institute, Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, European Regional Development Fund, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, Swedish Cultural Foundation, Blood Disease Foundation and the Finnish Cultural Foundation. M.H. and A.S. were supported by the DFG Research Unit FOR1961 (CONTROL-T; HE3553/4-2), by the Köln Fortune program, and by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation (10.15.2.034MN).

Acknowledgments

The personnel at the Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, HUSLAB Laboratory of Genetics (Soili Kytölä), and FIMM (Suvi Kyttänen and Tiina Hannunen) are acknowledged for their expert clinical and technical assistance. The authors thank Annabrita Schoonenberg from the Digital and Molecular Pathology Unit supported by Helsinki University and Biocenter Finland. Raphael Koch is acknowledged for providing cell lines. The authors thank Heidi Neubauer and Helena Sorger for valuable comments to the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Project, T.N.-H.L.C. A Clinical Evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group Classification of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Blood 1997, 89, 3909–3918. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellin, F.; Landström, J.; Jerkeman, M.; Relander, T. Real-world data on prognostic factors and treatment in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: A study from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry. Blood 2014, 124, 1570–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. International T-Cell Lymphoma Project; Vose, J.; Armitage, J.; Weisenburger, D. International Peripheral T-Cell and Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma Study: Pathology Findings and Clinical Outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 4124–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. D’Amore, F.; Relander, T.; Lauritzsen, G.F.; Jantunen, E.; Hagberg, H.; Anderson, H.; Holte, H.; Osterborg, A.; Merup, M.; Brown, P.; et al. Up-Front Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: NLG-T-01. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 3093–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mak, V.; Hamm, J.; Chhanabhai, M.; Shenkier, T.; Klasa, R.; Sehn, L.H.; Villa, D.; Gascoyne, R.D.; Connors, J.M.; Savage, K.J. Survival of Patients With Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma After First Relapse or Progression: Spectrum of Disease and Rare Long-Term Survivors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1970–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iqbal, J.; Wilcox, R.; Naushad, H.; Rohr, J.; Heavican, T.B.; Wang, C.; Bouska, A.; Fu, K.; Chan, W.C.; Vose, J.M.; et al. Genomic signatures in T-cell lymphoma: How can these improve precision in diagnosis and inform prognosis? Blood Rev. 2016, 30, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lemonnier, F.; Couronné, L.; Parrens, M.; Jaïs, J.-P.; Travert, M.; Lamant, L.; Tournillac, O.; Rousset, T.; Fabiani, B.; Cairns, R.A.; et al. Recurrent TET2 mutations in peripheral T-cell lymphomas correlate with TFH-like features and adverse clinical parameters. Blood 2012, 120, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sakata-Yanagimoto, M.; Enami, T.; Yoshida, K.; Shiraishi, Y.; Ishii, R.; Miyake, Y.; Muto, H.; Tsuyama, N.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Okuno, Y.; et al. Somatic RHOA mutation in angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palomero, T.; Couronné, L.; Khiabanian, H.; Kim, M.-Y.; Ambesi-Impiombato, A.; Perez-Garcia, A.; Carpenter, Z.; Abate, F.; Allegretta, M.; Haydu, J.E.; et al. Recurrent mutations in epigenetic regulators, RHOA and FYN kinase in peripheral T cell lymphomas. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Odejide, O.; Weigert, O.; Lane, A.A.; Toscano, D.; Lunning, M.A.; Kopp, N.; Kim, S.S.; Van Bodegom, D.; Bolla, S.; Schatz, J.H.; et al. A targeted mutational landscape of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2014, 123, 1293–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iqbal, J.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Greiner, T.C.; Vose, J.M.; McKeithan, T.; Küçük, C.; Geng, H.; Deffenbacher, K.; Smith, L.; Dybkær, K.; et al. Molecular signatures to improve diagnosis in peripheral T-cell lymphoma and prognostication in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2010, 115, 1026–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crescenzo, R.; Abate, F.; Lasorsa, E.; Tabbo’, F.; Gaudiano, M.; Chiesa, N.; Di Giacomo, F.; Spaccarotella, E.; Barbarossa, L.; Ercole, E.; et al. Convergent mutations and kinase fusions lead to oncogenic STAT3 activation in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2015, 27, 516–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pencik, J.; Pham, H.T.T.; Schmoellerl, J.; Javaheri, T.; Schlederer, M.; Culig, Z.; Merkel, O.; Moriggl, R.; Grebien, F.; Kenner, L. JAK-STAT signaling in cancer: From cytokines to non-coding genome. Cytokine 2016, 87, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vainchenker, W.; Constantinescu, S.N. JAK/STAT signaling in hematological malignancies. Oncogene 2012, 32, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Migone, T.; Lin, J.; Cereseto, A.; Mulloy, J.; O’Shea, J.; Franchini, G.; Leonard, W. Constitutively activated Jak-STAT pathway in T cells transformed with HTLV-I. Science 1995, 269, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heinrich, T.; Rengstl, B.; Muik, A.; Petkova, M.; Schmid, F.; Wistinghausen, R.; Warner, K.; Crispatzu, G.; Hansmann, M.-L.; Herling, M.; et al. Mature T-cell Lymphomagenesis Induced by Retroviral Insertional Activation of Janus Kinase 1. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nicolae, A.; Xi, L.; Pittaluga, S.; Abdullaev, Z.; Pack, S.D.; Chen, J.; Waldmann, T.A.; Jaffe, E.S.; Raffeld, M. Frequent STAT5B mutations in γδ hepatosplenic T-cell lymphomas. Leukemia 2014, 28, 2244–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bamford, S.; Dawson, E.; Forbes, S.; Clements, J.; Pettett, R.; Dogan, A.; Flanagan, A.; Teague, J.; Futreal, P.A.; Stratton, M.R.; et al. The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Couronné, L.; Scourzic, L.; Pilati, C.; Della Valle, V.; Duffourd, Y.; Solary, E.; Vainchenker, W.; Merlio, J.-P.; Beylot-Barry, M.; Damm, F.; et al. STAT3 mutations identified in human hematologic neoplasms induce myeloid malignancies in a mouse bone marrow transplantation model. Haematological 2013, 98, 1748–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jerez, A.; Clemente, M.J.; Makishima, H.; Rajala, H.; Gómez-Seguí, I.; Olson, T.; McGraw, K.; Przychodzen, B.; Kulasekararaj, A.; Afable, M.; et al. STAT3 mutations indicate the presence of subclinical T-cell clones in a subset of aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Blood 2013, 122, 2453–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Morin, R.D.; Mendez-Lago, M.; Mungall, A.J.; Goya, R.; Mungall, K.L.; Corbett, R.D.; Johnson, N.A.; Severson, T.M.; Chiu, R.; Field, M.A.; et al. Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Nature 2011, 476, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schrader, A.; Crispatzu, G.; Oberbeck, S.; Mayer, P.; Pützer, S.; Von Jan, J.; Vasyutina, E.; Warner, K.; Weit, N.; Pflug, N.; et al. Actionable perturbations of damage responses by TCL1/ATM and epigenetic lesions form the basis of T-PLL. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yoo, H.Y.; Sung, M.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.; Park, S.; Kim, S.C.; Lee, B.; Rho, K.; Lee, W.T.; et al. A recurrent inactivating mutation in RHOA GTPase in angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fujisawa, M.; Sakata-Yanagimoto, M.; Nishizawa, S.; Komori, D.; Gershon, P.; Kiryu, M.; Tanzima, S.; Fukumoto, K.; Enami, T.; Muratani, M.; et al. Activation of RHOA–VAV1 signaling in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2017, 32, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Han, J.J.; O’Byrne, M.; Stenson, M.J.; Maurer, M.; Wellik, L.E.; Feldman, A.L.; McPhail, E.D.; Witzig, T.E.; Gupta, M. Prognostic and therapeutic significance of phosphorylated STAT3 and protein tyrosine phosphatase-6 in peripheral-T cell lymphoma. Blood Cancer J. 2018, 8, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Petrus, M.N.; Xiao, W.; Nicolae, A.; Raffeld, M.; Pittaluga, S.; Bamford, R.N.; Nakagawa, M.; Ouyang, S.T.; et al. Cytokine receptor signaling is required for the survival of ALK−anaplastic large cell lymphoma, even in the presence of JAK1/STAT3 mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3975–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chiarle, R.; Voena, C.; Ambrogio, C.; Piva, R.; Inghirami, G. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase in the pathogenesis of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ohgami, R.S.; Ma, L.; Merker, J.D.; Martinez, B.; Zehnder, J.L.; A Arber, D. STAT3 mutations are frequent in CD30+ T-cell lymphomas and T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2013, 27, 2244–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Shair, K.H.Y.; Bendt, K.M.; Edwards, R.H.; Bedford, E.C.; Nielsen, J.N.; Raab-Traub, N. EBV Latent Membrane Protein 1 Activates Akt, NFκB, and Stat3 in B Cell Lymphomas. PLOS Pathog. 2007, 3, e166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Montes-Mojarro, I.; Steinhilber, J.; Bonzheim, I.; Quintanilla-Martinez, L.; Fend, F. The Pathological Spectrum of Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL). Cancers 2018, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Schwartz, D.M.; Kanno, Y.; Villarino, A.; Ward, M.; Gadina, M.; O’Shea, J.J. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Armitage, J.O. The aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphomas: 2017. Am. J. Hematol. 2017, 92, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Schatz, J.H.; Horwitz, S.; Teruya-Feldstein, J.; A Lunning, M.; Viale, A.; Huberman, K.; Socci, N.D.; Lailler, N.; Heguy, A.; Dolgalev, I.; et al. Targeted mutational profiling of peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified highlights new mechanisms in a heterogeneous pathogenesis. Leukemia 2014, 29, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Manso, R.; Sánchez-Beato, M.; González-Rincón, J.; Gómez, S.; Rojo, F.; Mollejo, M.; García-Cosio, M.; Menárguez, J.; Piris, M.A.; Rodríguez-Pinilla, S.M. Mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway genes and activation of the pathway, a relevant finding in nodal Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 183, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kataoka, K.; Nagata, Y.; Kitanaka, A.; Shiraishi, Y.; Shimamura, T.; Yasunaga, J.-I.; Totoki, Y.; Chiba, K.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Nagae, G.; et al. Integrated molecular analysis of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1304–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, T.L.; Nairismägi, M.-L.; Laurensia, Y.; Lim, J.Q.; Tan, J.; Li, Z.-M.; Pang, W.-L.; Kizhakeyil, A.; Wijaya, G.-C.; Huang, D.; et al. Oncogenic activation of the STAT3 pathway drives PD-L1 expression in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1146–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kiel, M.J.; Velusamy, T.; Rolland, D.; Sahasrabuddhe, A.; Chung, F.; Bailey, N.G.; Schrader, A.; Li, B.; Li, J.Z.; Ozel, A.B.; et al. Integrated genomic sequencing reveals mutational landscape of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2014, 124, 1460–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gäbler, K.; Behrmann, I.; Haan, C. JAK2 mutants (e.g., JAK2V617F) and their importance as drug targets in myeloproliferative neoplasms. JAK-STAT 2013, 2, e25025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fukuda, A.; Wang, S.; Morris, J.P.; Folias, A.E.; Liou, A.; Kim, G.E.; Akira, S.; Boucher, K.; Firpo, M.A.; Mulvihill, S.J.; et al. Stat3 and MMP7 Contribute to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Initiation and Progression. Cancer Cell 2011, 19, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alexander, W.; Hilton, D.S. The Role of Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) Proteins in Regulation of the Immune Response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 22, 503–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amador, C.; Greiner, T.; Heavican, T.B.; Smith, L.M.; Galvis, K.T.; Lone, W.G.; Bouska, A.; D’Amore, F.; Pedersen, M.B.; Pileri, S.A.; et al. Reproducing the Molecular Subclassification of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma-NOS by Immunohistochemistry. Blood 2019, 134, 2159–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heavican, T.B.; Bouska, A.; Yu, J.; Lone, W.; Amador, C.; Gong, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Dave, B.J.; Nairismägi, M.-L.; et al. Genetic drivers of oncogenic pathways in molecular subgroups of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2019, 133, 1664–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Zinzani, P.L.; Baliva, G.; Magagnoli, M.; Bendandi, M.; Modugno, G.; Gherlinzoni, F.; Orcioni, G.F.; Ascani, S.; Simoni, R.; Pileri, S.A.; et al. Gemcitabine Treatment in Pretreated Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: Experience in 44 Patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000, 18, 2603–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pellegrini, C.; Dodero, A.; Chiappella, A.; Monaco, F.; Degl’Innocenti, D.; Salvi, F.; Vitolo, U.; Argnani, L.; Corradini, P.; Zinzani, P.L.; et al. A phase II study on the role of gemcitabine plus romidepsin (GEMRO regimen) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Arkenau, H.-T.; Chong, G.; Cunningham, D.; Watkins, D.; Sirohi, B.; Chau, I.; Wotherspoon, A.; Norman, A.; Horwich, A.; Matutes, E. Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: The Royal Marsden Hospital experience. Haematology 2007, 92, 271–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Mahadevan, D.; Unger, J.M.; Spier, C.M.; Persky, D.O.; Young, F.; Leblanc, M.; Fisher, R.I.; Miller, T.P. Phase 2 trial of combined cisplatin, etoposide, gemcitabine, and methylprednisolone (PEGS) in peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0350. Cancer 2012, 119, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Rajala, H.L.M.; Eldfors, S.; Kuusanmäki, H.; Van Adrichem, A.J.; Olson, T.; Lagström, S.; I Andersson, E.; Jerez, A.; Clemente, M.J.; Yan, Y.; et al. Discovery of somatic STAT5b mutations in large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2013, 121, 4541–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Team, R. RStudio: Integrated Development for R; RStudio: Boston, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Cancers 12 00702 g001 550
Figure 1. STAT3 structure and mutation sites in ALCL, AITL, and PTCL-NOS patients of the study cohort.
Figure 1. STAT3 structure and mutation sites in ALCL, AITL, and PTCL-NOS patients of the study cohort.
Cancers 12 00702 g001
Cancers 12 00702 g002 550
Figure 2. Phosphorylation percentage of pY-STAT3, MAPK, and AKT in PTCL subgroups and healthy controls (n = 2–3) analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Individual dots represent the proportion of positive cells for pSTAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT. Boxplots represent the median and interquartile range of protein phosphorylation levels. The antibodies used were specific for Tyr705 (pStat3), Thr202/Tyr204 (pMAPK), and Thr450 (pAKT). Comparison was analyzed with ANOVA and post-hoc tests between disease groups and healthy controls. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01, ****: p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
Figure 2. Phosphorylation percentage of pY-STAT3, MAPK, and AKT in PTCL subgroups and healthy controls (n = 2–3) analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Individual dots represent the proportion of positive cells for pSTAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT. Boxplots represent the median and interquartile range of protein phosphorylation levels. The antibodies used were specific for Tyr705 (pStat3), Thr202/Tyr204 (pMAPK), and Thr450 (pAKT). Comparison was analyzed with ANOVA and post-hoc tests between disease groups and healthy controls. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01, ****: p < 0.0001; ns: not significant.
Cancers 12 00702 g002
Cancers 12 00702 g003 550
Figure 3. Western blot of p-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, p-JAK3 (Tyr980/981), and JAK3 was characterized in T cell malignancy cell lines. Beta-ACTIN is used as a reference protein.
Figure 3. Western blot of p-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, p-JAK3 (Tyr980/981), and JAK3 was characterized in T cell malignancy cell lines. Beta-ACTIN is used as a reference protein.
Cancers 12 00702 g003
Cancers 12 00702 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of the phosphorylation level of (A) STAT3, MAPK, and AKT by STAT3 mutation status and by (B) RHOA mutation status (t-test). The phosphorylation level of pStat3 (Tyr705), pMAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) and pAKT (Thr450) was measured by immunohistochemistry. (C) Combinatory effect of CD30 phenotype and JAK1 or STAT3 mutation status on pSTAT3 expression was studied with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc correction. Green dots correspond to patients with STAT3 mutations, the red dot correspond to a patient with JAK1 mutation and blue dots correspond to samples without mutations in JAK1 or STAT3. (D) Frequency table of patients by CD30 phenotype and JAK1 or STAT3 mutation status (rows) and different PTCL histologies (columns). *: p < 0.05; ns: not significant.
Figure 4. Comparison of the phosphorylation level of (A) STAT3, MAPK, and AKT by STAT3 mutation status and by (B) RHOA mutation status (t-test). The phosphorylation level of pStat3 (Tyr705), pMAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) and pAKT (Thr450) was measured by immunohistochemistry. (C) Combinatory effect of CD30 phenotype and JAK1 or STAT3 mutation status on pSTAT3 expression was studied with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc correction. Green dots correspond to patients with STAT3 mutations, the red dot correspond to a patient with JAK1 mutation and blue dots correspond to samples without mutations in JAK1 or STAT3. (D) Frequency table of patients by CD30 phenotype and JAK1 or STAT3 mutation status (rows) and different PTCL histologies (columns). *: p < 0.05; ns: not significant.
Cancers 12 00702 g004
Cancers 12 00702 g005 550
Figure 5. IHC stainings of four angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) lymph node samples. (A). Samples containing low amount of pSTAT3. (B). Samples containing high amounts of pSTAT3. Each slide has been digitalized with a 20× lens and similar exposure time per channel. Images have been further magnified 30× for visualization purposes. The first four rows of images represent single stainings of dapi counterstain, CD4, PD1, and pSTAT3 (Tyr705), respectively, and the last figure their composite image. Staining: red = CD4, blue = PD1, green = pSTAT3.
Figure 5. IHC stainings of four angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) lymph node samples. (A). Samples containing low amount of pSTAT3. (B). Samples containing high amounts of pSTAT3. Each slide has been digitalized with a 20× lens and similar exposure time per channel. Images have been further magnified 30× for visualization purposes. The first four rows of images represent single stainings of dapi counterstain, CD4, PD1, and pSTAT3 (Tyr705), respectively, and the last figure their composite image. Staining: red = CD4, blue = PD1, green = pSTAT3.
Cancers 12 00702 g005
Cancers 12 00702 g006 550
Figure 6. Heatmap visualizing the quantity of pY-STAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT and their association with clinicopathological parameters. The amount of phosphorylated STAT3, MAPK, and AKT have been median-centered and max-scaled, and organized columnwise by pY-STAT3 quantity and rowwise by hierarchical clustering using Spearman correlation distance and Ward linkage (ward.D2) method. Red color denotes higher and blue color lower proportion. Clinical parameters denoting disease histology, disease stage, log10-transformed lactate dehydrogenase (LD) level, survival status, and STAT3 and RHOA mutation status are added as annotations over the heatmap. CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, and CD30 immunophenotype status classified as positive or negative, EBV seropositivity and the MIB proliferation index (%) are presented below the heatmap.
Figure 6. Heatmap visualizing the quantity of pY-STAT3, pMAPK, and pAKT and their association with clinicopathological parameters. The amount of phosphorylated STAT3, MAPK, and AKT have been median-centered and max-scaled, and organized columnwise by pY-STAT3 quantity and rowwise by hierarchical clustering using Spearman correlation distance and Ward linkage (ward.D2) method. Red color denotes higher and blue color lower proportion. Clinical parameters denoting disease histology, disease stage, log10-transformed lactate dehydrogenase (LD) level, survival status, and STAT3 and RHOA mutation status are added as annotations over the heatmap. CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, and CD30 immunophenotype status classified as positive or negative, EBV seropositivity and the MIB proliferation index (%) are presented below the heatmap.
Cancers 12 00702 g006
Cancers 12 00702 g007 550
Figure 7. Differential drug sensitivity in pSTAT3 high (n = 27) and low (n = 583) cancer cell lines. The pSTAT3 phosphorylation level has been quantified with reverse phase protein array (RPPA, cut-off pSTAT3Tyr705 = 1). The drug sensitivity data represent the area under the curve (AUC) response of 265 different phamacological compounds, and has been retrieved from the Sanger GDSC dataset. The RPPA data are derived from the Broad Institute the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database. Differential drug sensitivity has been computed with multiple T-tests, and the fold change defined as the mean AUC ratio in pSTAT3 high-to-low cell lines. Drugs with a fold change (FC) less than 1.0 are more sensitive in pSTAT3 high cell lines. The target pathway of the top pharmacological hits have been color-labeled.
Figure 7. Differential drug sensitivity in pSTAT3 high (n = 27) and low (n = 583) cancer cell lines. The pSTAT3 phosphorylation level has been quantified with reverse phase protein array (RPPA, cut-off pSTAT3Tyr705 = 1). The drug sensitivity data represent the area under the curve (AUC) response of 265 different phamacological compounds, and has been retrieved from the Sanger GDSC dataset. The RPPA data are derived from the Broad Institute the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database. Differential drug sensitivity has been computed with multiple T-tests, and the fold change defined as the mean AUC ratio in pSTAT3 high-to-low cell lines. Drugs with a fold change (FC) less than 1.0 are more sensitive in pSTAT3 high cell lines. The target pathway of the top pharmacological hits have been color-labeled.
Cancers 12 00702 g007
Table
Table 1. STAT3, JAK1/3, and RHOA mutation frequencies in PTCLs.
Table 1. STAT3, JAK1/3, and RHOA mutation frequencies in PTCLs.
PTCL
Subtype		nSTAT3 Mutation FrequencyJAK1/3 Mutation FrequencyRHOA Mutation FrequencyCo-Occuring Mutations
AITL3013%0%70%10%
NOS1217%0%17%8%
ALK+ ALCL813%0%0%None
ALK− ALCL1338%15%0%8%
All6319%3%37%8%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andersson, E.I.; Brück, O.; Braun, T.; Mannisto, S.; Saikko, L.; Lagström, S.; Ellonen, P.; Leppä, S.; Herling, M.; Kovanen, P.E.; et al. STAT3 Mutation Is Associated with STAT3 Activation in CD30+ ALK− ALCL. Cancers 2020, 12, 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030702

AMA Style

Andersson EI, Brück O, Braun T, Mannisto S, Saikko L, Lagström S, Ellonen P, Leppä S, Herling M, Kovanen PE, et al. STAT3 Mutation Is Associated with STAT3 Activation in CD30+ ALK− ALCL. Cancers. 2020; 12(3):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andersson, Emma I., Oscar Brück, Till Braun, Susanna Mannisto, Leena Saikko, Sonja Lagström, Pekka Ellonen, Sirpa Leppä, Marco Herling, Panu E. Kovanen, and et al. 2020. "STAT3 Mutation Is Associated with STAT3 Activation in CD30+ ALK− ALCL" Cancers 12, no. 3: 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030702

APA Style

Andersson, E. I., Brück, O., Braun, T., Mannisto, S., Saikko, L., Lagström, S., Ellonen, P., Leppä, S., Herling, M., Kovanen, P. E., & Mustjoki, S. (2020). STAT3 Mutation Is Associated with STAT3 Activation in CD30+ ALK− ALCL. Cancers, 12(3), 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop