Next Article in Journal
Ablation in Pancreatic Cancer: Past, Present and Future
Next Article in Special Issue
Possible Role of IRS-4 in the Origin of Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Does the Duration of Primary and First Revision Surgery Influence the Probability of First and Subsequent Implant Failures after Extremity Sarcoma Resection and Megaprosthetic Reconstruction?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minimization of Immunosuppressive Therapy Is Associated with Improved Survival of Liver Transplant Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Intraoperative Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
2
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(11), 2508; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112508
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 5 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 21 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Past to the Future)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which describes a patient’s nutritional, inflammatory status, and immune response, has been reported as a predictor associated with prognosis in a variety of cancers, and has been reported to be associated with surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few studies have assessed the association between PNI and intraoperative transfusion. This study evaluated the predicting value of preoperative PNI for intraoperative transfusion in patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. We found that preoperative PNI < 44 was significantly associated with intraoperative transfusion and surgical outcomes. These results suggest that preoperative PNI might be a predictor of intraoperative transfusion, and surgical prognosis in patients who underwent hepatectomy.

Abstract

Background: PNI is significantly associated with surgical outcomes; however, the association between PNI and intraoperative transfusions is unknown. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 1065 patients who underwent hepatectomy. We divided patients into two groups according to the PNI (<44 and >44) and compared their transfusion rates and surgical outcomes. We performed multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis to determine risk factors for transfusion and the 5-year survival. Additionally, we found the net reclassification index (NRI) to validate the discriminatory power of PNI. Results: The PNI <44 group had higher transfusion rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.06–4.60, p = 0.035) and poor surgical outcomes, such as post hepatectomy liver failure (adjusted [OR]: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.87–4.87, p < 0.001), and low 5-year survival (adjusted OR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.17–2.24, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, PNI <44, age, hemoglobin, operation time, synthetic colloid use, and laparoscopic surgery were risk factors for intraoperative transfusion. On Cox regression analysis, PNI <44, MELD score, TNM staging, synthetic colloid use, and transfusion were associated with poorer 5-year survival. NRI analysis showed significant improvement in the predictive power of PNI for transfusion (p = 0.002) and 5-year survival (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Preoperative PNI <44 was significantly associated with higher transfusion rates and surgical outcomes.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of primary cancer, the sixth most common neoplasm, and the third leading cause of cancer death [1]. The incidence of HCC is increasing due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with more than 782,000 new cases diagnosed each year, and recently, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become an important cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in developed areas. [1,2]. The main treatment is hepatectomy, which is one of the most complex major abdominal surgeries [3]. Although various surgical techniques, such as laparoscopy, the pringle maneuvers, and inferior vena cava (IVC) clamping to minimize bleeding during liver surgery, have reduced intraoperative bleeding [3,4], hepatectomy still has a very high bleeding risk and often requires blood transfusion [5,6,7].
The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated from serum albumin concentration and total lymphocyte count, describes a patient’s nutritional and inflammatory status, and immune response [8]. PNI has been reported as a prognostic predictor in a variety of cancers [9,10], and a recent meta-analysis reported that preoperative PNI is a prognostic marker in HCC patients [11]. Further, PNI has been reported to be significantly associated with survival and complications in surgical patients [12,13]. However, there are few studies on the association between preoperative PNI and intraoperative bleeding and transfusion in surgical patients.
Therefore, we sought to validate preoperative PNI as a predictor for intraoperative transfusion in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Population

The institutional review board (IRB) of Asan Medical Center (protocol number: 2021-0243) approved this study and the need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of our study. We reviewed all patients diagnosed with primary HCC based on the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) who underwent open or laparoscopic hepatectomy between January 2008 and October 2015. Adult patients aged 18 years and older were included in the study. All surgeries were performed sequentially by one surgeon. The exclusion criteria were as follows: age < 18 or ≥80 years; patients who had hematologic disease; patients who had taken anticoagulants, such as warfarin and aspirin; patients who underwent emergency surgery; pregnant women; and patients with incomplete data or missing PNI values.

2.2. General Anesthesia

After routine monitoring (pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, capnography, and noninvasive blood pressure measurement), general anesthesia was induced with an intravenous bolus injection of thiopental sodium (4–5 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6–1.2 mg/kg). Before endotracheal intubation, an intravenous bolus of fentanyl, 1– 2 μg/kg, was injected and anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane 2–4 vol% in 50% air/oxygen. The patients were mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg, and the respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure of 35–40 mmHg. Invasive arterial and central venous pressure monitoring were routinely conducted. During anesthesia, crystalloid solutions (lactate Ringer’s solution or plasma solution) or colloid solutions (5% albumin, synthetic colloid (Voluven®; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) were administered. The total volume of infused synthetic colloid did not exceed 20 mL/kg. If the plasma hemoglobin (Hb) level was less than 8 g/dL during surgery, packed red blood cells (RBCs) were transfused. Vasopressors and inotropes, such as ephedrine, phenylephrine, or norepinephrine, were administered if the mean arterial blood pressure was <65 mmHg, as determined by an anesthesiologist.

2.3. Surgical Technique

The patient selected the surgical method after receiving a comprehensive explanation of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. For laparoscopic surgery, the patient was placed in the supine position and the reverse Trendelenburg position. The first access to the abdomen was through an umbilical port. After a pneumoperitoneum by carbon dioxide was established with a pressure of 10 to 15 mmHg, 3 or 4 additional ports were placed. For open surgery, abdominal surgery was performed through a J-shaped incision. The liver parenchyma was separated using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA Excel; Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA). After parenchymal incision, the hepatic vein was cut with a vascular stapler or clamp, and then sutured. After parenchymal dissection, the hepatic vein was ligated with an endoscopic stapler. The resected specimen was retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision.

2.4. Clinical Data Collection and Outcome Assessments

Demographic data, preoperative laboratory, and intraoperative variables were collected by using our computerized medical record system. Demographic data included age, sex, weight, body mass index (BMI), liver cirrhosis, tumor etiology, antiviral therapy, preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), TNM staging, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score. Variables related to the patients’ tumor characteristics included the number of tumors, largest tumor size, lymph node invasion, and metastasis.
Preoperative laboratory values included preoperative white blood cell (WBC), Hb, platelet, prothrombin time, serum creatinine (sCr), estimated glomerular filter ratio (eGFR), albumin, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and sodium. Serum creatinine levels were checked daily from postoperative day 1 (POD) to 7 to confirm acute kidney injury (AKI). The preoperative PNI, and red cell distribution width (RDW) values were also collected. PNI was calculated using the following formula: {10 × serum albumin (g/dL)} + {0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3)}. Intraoperative variables included operation time, laparoscopic surgery, extensive surgery (≥3 segments), administered fluids, and urine output. Intraoperative RBC, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelet transfusion, postoperative transfusion, hospital day, postoperative AKI, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonged ICU stay (≥2 days), and 1-year and 5-year survival records were also collected.

2.5. Primary and Secondary Outcomes

The primary outcomes were to compare the incidence of intraoperative transfusion according to the preoperative PNI (<44 and >44) and to analyze the risk factors associated with intraoperative transfusion. Massive transfusion was defined as ≥10 units of packed RBC (pRBC) within 24 h or ≥4 units of pRBC within 1 h [14]. The secondary outcomes were to compare the surgical outcomes, such as hospital day, postoperative AKI, PHLF, ICU admission, prolonged ICU stay (≥2 days), and 1-year and 5-year survival, according to the preoperative PNI cut-off value. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes classification (KDIGO): sCr increased by at least 1.5 times at baseline before surgery within 7 days or sCr increased by 0.3 mg/dL within 48 h [15]. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive power of PNI for intraoperative transfusion through net reclassification index (NRI) analysis.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact test, and the independent t test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate continuous variables, as appropriate. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median with interquartile range, or n (proportion). We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the cut-off value for predicting intraoperative transfusion. To compare the PNI discrimination power for predicting intraoperative transfusion, a clinical model was created with the previously known risk factors (age, MELD scores, and Hb) and PNI was added to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and net reclassification index (NRI). The NRI is a measure for evaluating the improvement in prediction performance gained by adding a marker to a set of baseline predictors [16]. NRI was used to comprehensively evaluate the discrimination of the model along with the AUC [16].
We used multiple logistic regression analysis to determine independent predictors of intraoperative transfusion and all variables with p-value less than 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. To assess the hazards ratio (HR) of the risk factors of 5-year survival, Cox regression analysis was also used. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) method was used to analyze the cumulative survival rate between two groups (PNI level <44 group and ≥44 group), and the log rank test was used to evaluate the change between curves. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyzes were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Out of 1167 patients who underwent hepatectomy, 102 patients were excluded (patients who had hematologic disease (n = 4); patients who had taken anticoagulants, such as warfarin and aspirin (n = 42); patients who underwent emergency surgery (n = 12); and patients with incomplete data or missing PNI values (n = 44), 1065 patients were included in this study. According to ROC curve analysis, a cut-off value of preoperative PNI of 44 predicted intraoperative transfusion (area under the curve 0.733, sensitivity 68.3%, specificity 71.0%) (Figure 1). Patients were divided into two groups by PNI value: PNI <44 (n = 333) and PNI ≥44 (n = 732).
The demographic, laboratory, and intraoperative variables of the patients are shown in Table 1. The preoperative PNI <44 group were older (p = 0.026), more likely to be female (p = 0.002), had a lower BMI (p = 0.038), poor TNM staging (p = 0.046), and higher MELD scores (p < 0.001) and CTP scores (p < 0.001) than the preoperative PNI group ≥44. However, the incidence of liver cirrhosis (p = 0.764), DM (p = 0.487), HTN (p = 0.163), CAD (p = 0.728) and tumor etiology (p = 0.623), antiviral therapy (p = 0.866), and preoperative TACE (p = 0.542) were not significantly different between the two groups.
Regarding the laboratory variables, the PNI <44 group had significantly lower levels of WBCs (p < 0.001), Hb (p < 0.001), sCr (p < 0.001), and sodium (p < 0.001), and significantly higher prothrombin time (p < 0.001), total bilirubin (p = 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (p < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.049), and RDW (p < 0.001) levels. There was no significant difference in platelet count (p = 0.163) and eGFR (p = 0.125) between the two groups.
The surgery time was significantly longer in the PNI <44 group (p = 0.028), and colloids were administered in a higher amount in the PNI <44 group (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the incidence of laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.392), total fluids (p = 0.729), and urine output (p = 0.469) between the two groups.

3.1. Primary Outcomes

The incidence of intraoperative transfusions according to the PNI (<44 and ≥44) is shown in Table 1. Out of the 1065 patients, 63 (5.9%) received intraoperative blood transfusions, 24 (2.3%) received massive transfusions, and 33 (3.1%) received postoperative transfusions. The intraoperative transfusions were 12.6% (42/333) in the PNI <44 group and 2.9% (21/732) in the PNI ≥44 group, with the differences between the two groups being significant (p < 0.001). The massive transfusion rate was 5.1% (17/333) in the PNI <44 group and 1.0% (7/732) in the PNI ≥44 group, differing significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative transfusions between the two groups (p = 0.945).
In the multivariable analysis, preoperative PNI was significantly associated with intraoperative transfusion (odds ratio (OR) 2.54, 95%CI 1.21–5.32, p = 0.014) (Table 2). Additionally, the age (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.01–1.08, p = 0.010), Hb level (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.48–0.75, p < 0.001), operation time (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.01–1.02, p < 0.001), synthetic colloid use (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.13–4.82, p = 0.021), and laparoscopic surgery (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.04–0.15, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with intraoperative transfusion (Table 2). However, preoperative PNI was not significantly associated with postoperative trans-fusion (odds ratio (OR) 1.92, 95%CI 0.90–4.10, p = 0.089) (Table S1).

3.2. Secondary Outcomes

The PNI < 44 group demonstrated a higher incidence of PHLF (18.32% vs. 4.64%, p < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in hospital days (21.18 days vs. 20.79 days, p = 0.851), rates of postoperative AKI (7.21% vs. 5.60%, p = 0.334), ICU admissions (7.51% vs. 7.24%, p = 0.899), and prolonged ICU stay (4.20% vs. 2.46%, p = 0.125) (Table 1). The PNI <44 group also showed poor 1-year survival (12.01% vs. 3.42%, p < 0.001), 5-year survival (34.83% vs. 17.90%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (42.64% vs. 24.45%, p < 0.001) (Table 1). In the Cox regression analysis, preoperative PNI <44 was significantly associated with 5-year survival (hazards ratio [HR] 1.69, 95%CI 1.27–2.24, p < 0.001) (Table 3). MELD scores (HR 1.17, 95%CI 1.06–1.29, p = 0.002), TNM staging (stage 2; HR 1.57, 95%CI 0.90–2.76, p = 0.013, stage 3; HR 2.61, 95%CI 1.26–5.39, p = 0.010, stage 4; HR 3.72, 95%CI 2.84–4.88, p < 0.001), synthetic colloid use (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.31–2.22, p < 0.001), and transfusion (HR 2.21, 95%CI 1.51–3.23, p < 0.001) were also significantly associated with the 5-year survival (Table 3).
Preoperative PNI < 44 was significantly associated with PHLF (OR 3.02, 95%CI 1.87–4.87, p = 0.002) and 1-year survival (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.19–2.18, p = 0.002) even after adjusting for other potentially confounding variables (Table 4).
The addition of PNI to the clinical model for intraoperative transfusion consisting of age, MELD, and Hb level showed no significant improvement in AUC (p = 0.506) but showed significant improvement of the predictive power in NRI analysis (0.392, 95% CI 0.143–0.641, p = 0.002) (Table 5). The addition of PNI to the clinical model for 5-year survival consisting of age, sex, DM, TNM staging, MELD, synthetic colloid use, and RBC transfusion showed a significant improvement in the AUC (p = 0.021), which also showed significant improvement of the predictive power in NRI analysis (0.136, 95% CI 0.041–0.213, p = 0.004) (Table 5).
Figure 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier curve according to preoperative PNI (<44 and ≥44). The 5-year survival was significantly lower in the PNI level <44 group than in the PNI level ≥ 44 group (log-rank test; p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated a significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative transfusion (12.61% vs. 2.87%) according to the PNI (<44 and ≥44) in patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. PNI <44 was also associated with PHLF and a poor survival rate. NRI analysis showed significant improvement in the predictive power of PNI. These main findings suggest that preoperative PNI level may be an independent predictor for intraoperative transfusion and surgical outcomes in HCC patients.
Intraoperative bleeding is a major surgical problem, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality [17,18]. Perioperative uncontrolled bleeding leads to a combination of hemodilution, hemostatic factor consumption, hypothermia, and acid base imbalance, which resulted in acquired coagulation abnormalities and a vicious cycle [19]. In addition, intraoperative blood transfusion is associated with a higher risk of mortality and morbidity in surgical patients [20]. Major surgery for liver diseases, such as partial hepatectomy and liver transplantation (LT), is associated with significant intraoperative bleeding and transfusion [21,22]; therefore, many surgical and anesthetic techniques have been used in an attempt to minimize bleeding during liver surgery [23,24]. However, intraoperative bleeding and transfusion during liver surgery still remains difficult to predict [25,26]. One study reported that the MELD score did not predict intraoperative bleeding and transfusion during liver transplantation [27]. There is a poor association between bleeding and prothrombin time in patients with chronic liver disease [28,29]. Although there have been studies showing that preoperative Hb is an important factor in predicting bleeding and transfusion during liver surgery [26,30,31], few studies have demonstrated the predictive power of other biologic markers for intraoperative transfusion in patients with HCC. Recently, one study reported that the PNI < 45.6 was significant associated with postoperative complications and blood loss in patients who underwent partial hepatectomy [32]. Our study is clinically meaningful as a major investigation of the association between preoperative PNI and intraoperative transfusion in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC. In this study, the incidence of intraoperative transfusion increased significantly in patients with a PNI cut-off value < 44. This is consistent with other previous studies suggesting 44 as the cut-off value for complications [32,33]. Additionally, the clinical model, combined with PNI and known risk factors, improved the predictive power for intraoperative blood transfusion. These results suggest that PNI is strongly associated with intraoperative transfusion.
In our multivariate logistic regression analysis, preoperative PNI < 44, age, operation time, laparoscopic surgery, synthetic colloid use, and Hb were significantly associated with intraoperative transfusion. The age and operation time reflect the patient’s systemic condition, comorbid disease status, and severity of disease, and have been reported as risk factors for blood transfusion in various surgeries [34,35,36]. Laparoscopic liver resection has been reported to have less blood loss and less need for transfusion with regard to the benefits of the minimally invasive approach [37]. Synthetic colloid administration has been reported to be associated with coagulopathy and transfusion [38,39]. However, in our study, the synthetic colloids were limited to 20 mL/kg; therefore, the relationship between synthetic colloids and transfusion is thought to be a consequence of the increased colloid use due to bleeding.
Preoperative Hb has been reported as a risk factor of intraoperative bleeding in liver surgery [26,30,31]. Transfusions occur when Hb levels are low; therefore, Hb is one of the strongest indicators of the need for transfusions. Previous studies have shown that there is no significant difference in oxygen delivery capacity, mortality, and morbidity when Hb is 7 or higher [40,41]. Therefore, restrictive transfusion approaches are increasingly being implemented as best practices in recent years [42].
In the current study, the association between preoperative PNI and transfusions seems to be due to characteristics of PNI, which reflect the patient’s inflammatory response and nutritional status. Various inflammatory reactions and release of cytokines interfere with the coagulation system and create a thrombotic state [43], which increases the risk of bleeding during surgery [44,45]. Nutritional deficiency can accelerate catabolic response, resulting in decreased protein synthesis and liver regeneration [46]. Deterioration of liver function and cirrhosis on its own makes surgery difficult and may increase the risk of bleeding, associated with a thrombotic state [47,48]. In addition, recent studies reported that elevated RDW may be associated with bleeding risk [49]. The suppression of erythrocyte maturation by inflammatory cytokines causes anisocytosis and abnormal erythropoietin function, which is associated with anemia, thrombotic state [50], and hemorrhagic tendency [49,51]. In this study, there was a significant difference in RDW values according to the PNI cut-off value; this may have a significant correlation with the findings of the study. However, in our multivariate logistic regression analysis, PNI was significantly associated with intraoperative transfusion, whereas RDW did not. Therefore, in our study, PNI seems to have a better association with blood transfusions than RDW.
In our study, patients with a PNI level < 44 had a higher incidence of PHLF and poor 1-year and 5-year survival rates. In addition, PNI showed better predictive power for survival when combined with other risk factors. These results suggest that low PNI levels provide better information in predicting poor surgical prognosis.
There are several limitations to our study. First, our study is a retrospective study, and confounding factors not considered may cause potential errors. However, we tried to reduce the impact of confounding factors by adjusting for variables that could affect the outcome. Second, our data were collected from a single medical center and the results may have been biased due to homogeneous groups. Therefore, further studies of heterogeneous groups are required. In addition, our center has achieved over 800 liver resections per year and 300 LDLTs per year since 2010 [52], and the liver transplant team has extensive experience; therefore, our transfusion rate may be rather low than in other centers. Third, in our study, the proportion of the high TNM stage (≥3) group is high (30.0%), which may affect the increase of mortality. However, nevertheless, the 1-year and 5-year mortality in our center are 6.1% and 23.2%, respectively, which are generally lower than those of other medical centers reported in the literature [53]. Fourth, to date, there is no exact consensus on the cutoff value of preoperative PNI that predicts intraoperative transfusion and survival rates. Therefore, more well-designed studies are needed to accurately validate preoperative PNI cutoff values.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a preoperative PNI level of <44 was associated with various surgical outcomes and intraoperative transfusions in patients who underwent hepatectomy. These results suggest that preoperative PNI might be a potent predictor of transfusion and surgical prognosis in HCC surgery.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers13112508/s1, Table S1: Univariate and multivariable analysis of the risk Factors of postoperative transfusion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.S., S.-H.K., and J.-G.S.; Data curation, J.H.S., S.-H.K., and I.-G.J.; Formal analysis, S.-J.K., B.K., and S.K.; Funding acquisition, S.-H.K.; Investigation, S.-J.K. and S.K.; Methodology, J.H.S., I.-G.J., and J.-G.S.; Resources, B.K., and S.K.; Supervision, S.-H.K., and J.-G.S.; Visualization, J.H.S., Writing—original draft, J.H.S., and J.-G.S.; Writing—review and editing, J.H.S., and J.-G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI18C2383).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center (protocol number: 2021-0243, date of approval: 15 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of our study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to conditions of the ethics committee of our university.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forner, A.; Reig, M.; Bruix, J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018, 391, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kobayashi, M.; Ikeda, K.; Hosaka, T.; Sezaki, H.; Someya, T.; Akuta, N.; Suzuki, F.; Suzuki, Y.; Saitoh, S.; Arase, Y.; et al. Natural history of compensated cirrhosis in the Child-Pugh class a compared between 490 patients with hepatitis C and 167 with B virus infections. J. Med. Virol. 2006, 78, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoshida, H.; Taniai, N.; Yoshioka, M.; Hirakata, A.; Kawano, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Ueda, J.; Takata, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Mamada, Y. Current Status of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy. J. Nippon Med. Sch. 2019, 86, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Xiao, L.-K.; Huang, P.; Wu, K.; Xiang, J.-F.; Fu, X.; Zheng, M.-Y.; Song, X.-X.; Xie, W. Effect of infrahepatic inferior vena cava partial clamping on central venous pressure and intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 2021, 35, 2773–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Spolverato, G.; Ejaz, A.; Kim, Y.; Hall, B.L.; Bilimoria, K.; Cohen, M.; Ko, C.; Pitt, H.; Pawlik, T.M. Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: A query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 196, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Romano, F.; Garancini, M.; Uggeri, F.; Degrate, L.; Nespoli, L.; Gianotti, L.; Nespoli, A.; Uggeri, F. Bleeding in hepatic surgery: Sorting through methods to prevent it. HPB Surg. 2012, 2012, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Boer, M.T.; Molenaar, I.Q.; Porte, R.J. Impact of blood loss on outcome after liver resection. Dig. Surg. 2007, 24, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Onodera, T.; Goseki, N.; Kosaki, G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1984, 85, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Y.; Shen, J.; Liu, R.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ling, L.; Chen, L. Prognostic value of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2018, 33, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abe, A.; Hayashi, H.; Ishihama, T.; Furuta, H. Prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index in cases of resected oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Man, Z.; Pang, Q.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Yang, S.; Jin, H.; Liu, H. Prognostic significance of preoperative prognostic nutritional index in hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. HPB 2018, 20, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Park, S.; Ahn, H.J.; Yang, M.; Kim, J.A.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.J. The prognostic nutritional index and postoperative complications after curative lung cancer resection: A retrospective cohort study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2020, 160, 276–285.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yang, Y.; Gao, P.; Song, Y.; Sun, J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J.; Ma, B.; Wang, Z. The prognostic nutritional index is a predictive indicator of prognosis and postoperative complications in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 2016, 42, 1176–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pham, H.P.; Shaz, B.H. Update on massive transfusion. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013, 111, i71–i82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Section 2: AKI Definition. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2012, 2, 19–36. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cook, N.R. Quantifying the added value of new biomarkers: How and how not. Diagn. Progn. Res. 2018, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Girardis, M.; Busani, S.; Marietta, M. Severe Bleeding in Critical Care. In Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency A.P.I.C.E.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Janny, S.; Eurin, M.; Dokmak, S.; Toussaint, A.; Farges, O.; Paugam-Burtz, C. Assessment of the external validity of a predictive score for blood transfusion in liver surgery. HPB 2015, 17, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ghadimi, K.; Levy, J.; Welsby, I. Perioperative management of the bleeding patient. Br. J. Anaesth. 2016, 117, iii18–iii30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Glance, L.G.; Dick, A.W.; Mukamel, D.B.; Fleming, F.J.; Zollo, R.A.; Wissler, R.; Salloum, R.; Meredith, U.W.; Osler, T.M. Association between intraoperative blood transfusion and mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2011, 114, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Marietta, M.; Facchini, L.; Pedrazzi, P.; Busani, S.; Torelli, G. Pathophysiology of bleeding in surgery. Transplant. Proc. 2006, 38, 812–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shirabe, K.; Kajiyama, K.; Harimoto, N.; Tsujita, E.; Wakiyama, S.; Maehara, Y. Risk factors for massive bleeding during major hepatectomy. World J. Surg. 2010, 34, 1555–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Westerkamp, A.C.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. How to minimize blood loss during liver surgery in patients with cirrhosis. HPB 2009, 11, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Alkozai, E.M.; Lisman, T.; Porte, R.J. Bleeding in liver surgery: Prevention and treatment. Clin. Liver Dis. 2009, 13, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Steib, A.; Freys, G.; Lehmann, C.; Meyer, C.; Mahoudeau, G. Intraoperative blood losses and transfusion requirements during adult liver transplantation remain difficult to predict. Can. J. Anesth. J. Can. D’anesthésie 2001, 48, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Araújo, T.; Cordeiro, A.; Proença, P.; Perdigoto, R.; Martins, A.; Barroso, E. Predictive variables affecting transfusion requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 2010, 42, 1758–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Massicotte, L.; Beaulieu, D.; Roy, J.-D.; Marleau, D.; Vandenbroucke, F.; Dagenais, M.; Lapointe, R.; Roy, A. MELD Score and blood product requirements during liver transplantation: No link. Transplantation 2009, 87, 1689–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caldwell, S.H.; Hoffman, M.; Lisman, T.; Macik, B.G.; Northup, P.G.; Reddy, K.R.; Tripodi, A.; Sanyal, A.J. Coagulation in liver disease group coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: Pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management. Hepatology 2006, 44, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tripodi, A.; Mannucci, P.M. Abnormalities of hemostasis in chronic liver disease: Reappraisal of their clinical significance and need for clinical and laboratory research. J. Hepatol. 2007, 46, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choi, S.-S.; Cho, S.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Jun, I.-G.; Hwang, G.-S.; Kim, Y.-K. Factors associated with blood transfusion in donor hepatectomy. Transplantation 2013, 96, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pandey, C.K. Intraoperative blood loss in orthotopic liver transplantation: The predictive factors. World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015, 7, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ke, M.; Xu, T.; Li, N.; Ren, Y.; Shi, A.; Lv, Y.; He, H. Prognostic nutritional index predicts short-term outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81611–81620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yu, J.; Hong, B.; Park, J.-Y.; Hwang, J.-H.; Kim, Y.-K. Impact of prognostic nutritional index on postoperative pulmonary complications in radical cystectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021, 28, 1859–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ad, N.; Massimiano, P.S.; Burton, N.A.; Halpin, L.; Pritchard, G.; Shuman, D.J.; Holmes, S.D. Effect of patient age on blood product transfusion after cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015, 150, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cleland, S.; Corredor, C.; Ye, J.J.; Srinivas, C.; A McCluskey, S. Massive haemorrhage in liver transplantation: Consequences, prediction and management. World J. Transplant. 2016, 6, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Eghbal, M.H.; Samadi, K.; Khosravi, M.B.; Sahmeddini, M.A.; Ghaffaripoor, S.; Ghorbani, M.; Shokrizadeh, S. The impact of preoperative variables on intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplant. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2019, 17, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Takahara, T.; Wakabayashi, G.; Beppu, T.; Aihara, A.; Hasegawa, K.; Gotohda, N.; Hatano, E.; Tanahashi, Y.; Mizuguchi, T.; Kamiyama, T.; et al. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: A multi-institutional Japanese study. J. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2015, 22, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kozek-Langenecker, S.A. Effects of Hydroxyethyl starch solutions on hemostasis. Anesthesiology 2005, 103, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hilbert-Carius, P.; Schwarzkopf, D.; Reinhart, K.; Hartog, C.S.; Lefering, R.; Bernhard, M.; Struck, M.F. Synthetic colloid resuscitation in severely injured patients: Analysis of a nationwide trauma registry (TraumaRegister DGU). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Carson, J.L.; Noveck, H.; Berlin, J.A.; Gould, S.A. Mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative Hb levels who decline blood transfusion. Transfusion 2002, 42, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Finch, C.A.; Lenfant, C. Oxygen transport in man. N. Engl. J. Med. 1972, 286, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Goodnough, L.T.; Levy, J.H.; Murphy, M.F. Concepts of blood transfusion in adults. Lancet 2013, 381, 1845–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, Z.-L.; Guo, T.; Zhu, D.-L.; Zheng, S.; Han, D.-D.; Chen, Y. Risk factors of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatoma Res. 2020, 2020, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krzanicki, D.; Sugavanam, A.; Mallett, S. Intraoperative hypercoagulability during liver transplantation as demonstrated by thromboelastography. Liver Transplant. 2013, 19, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ng, K.F.; Lo, J.W. The development of hypercoagulability state, as measured by thrombelastography, associated with in-traoperative surgical blood loss. Anaesth. Intensive Care 1996, 24, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bothe, A.; Steele, G. Is there a role for perioperative nutritional support in liver resection? HPB Surg. 1997, 10, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ponziani, F.R. Portal vein thrombosis: Insight into physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Campillo, B.; Richardet, J.-P.; Bories, P.-N. Validation of body mass index for the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gastroentérologie Clinique Biologique 2006, 30, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, K.R.; Park, S.O.; Kim, S.Y.; Hong, D.Y.; Kim, J.W.; Baek, K.J.; Shin, D.H.; Lee, Y.H. Red cell distribution width as a novel marker for predicting high-risk from upper gastro-intestinal bleeding patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Byrnes, J.R.; Wolberg, A.S. Red blood cells in thrombosis. Blood 2017, 130, 1795–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Semba, R.D.; Patel, K.V.; Ferrucci, L.; Sun, K.; Roy, C.N.; Guralnik, J.M.; Fried, L.P. Serum antioxidants and inflammation predict red cell distribution width in older women: The women’s health and aging study I. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 29, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Moon, D.-B.; Lee, S.-G.; Hwang, S.; Kim, K.-H.; Ahn, C.-S.; Ha, T.-Y.; Song, G.-W.; Jung, D.-H.; Park, G.-C.; Namkoong, J.-M.; et al. More than 300 consecutive living donor liver transplants a year at a single center. Transplant. Proc. 2013, 45, 1942–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lin, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-S.; Lee, P.-H.; Lo, G.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.; Hsieh, P.-M.; Koh, K.W.; Bair, M.-J.; Dai, C.-Y.; Huang, J.-F.; et al. Significant predictors of overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for predicting intraoperative transfusion.
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for predicting intraoperative transfusion.
Cancers 13 02508 g001
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 5-year survival according to the preoperative PNI cut off value <44 (log-rank test; p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 5-year survival according to the preoperative PNI cut off value <44 (log-rank test; p < 0.001).
Cancers 13 02508 g002
Table 1. Demographic, laboratory, and intraoperative variables, and surgical outcomes of the study population.
Table 1. Demographic, laboratory, and intraoperative variables, and surgical outcomes of the study population.
Demographic, Laboratory, and Intraoperative Variables
Prognostic Nutritional Index
<44 (n = 333)≥44 (n = 732)p-Value
Demographic variables
Age; years57.14 ± 10.6755.06 ± 10.100.026
Sex; female85 (25.53)124 (16.94)0.002
Weight; kg64.21 ± 10.1667.56 ± 10.170.185
BMI; kg.m−223.83 ± 3.0024.33 ± 2.820.038
Liver cirrhosis124 (37.24)264 (36.7)0.764
Etiology 0.623
HBV258 (77.48)540 (73.77)
HCV26 (7.81)70 (9.56)
Alcoholic30 (9.01)76 (10.38)
NAFLD19 (5.71)46 (6.28)
Antiviral therapy143 (42.94)320 (43.72)0.866
TACE66 (19.82)132 (18.03)0.542
TNM staging 0.046
1194 (58.38)491 (67.03)
220 (5.99)41 (5.61)
3A8 (2.4)8 (1.09)
3B2 (0.6)3 (0.41)
4A95 (28.44)174 (23.8)
4B14 (4.19)15 (2.05)
Number of tumors
Solitary290 (87.09)658 (89.89)0.211
≥243 (12.91)74 (10.11)
Tumor size5.61 ± 4.834.00 ± 2.97<0.001
Lymph node invasion103 (30.93)183 (0.25)0.025
Metastasis14 (4.20)16 (2.19)0.100
DM24 (7.21)43 (5.87)0.487
HTN29 (8.71)45 (6.15)0.163
CAD2 (0.60)7 (0.96)0.728
MELD scores7.70 ± 1.427.01 ± 1.00<0.001
CTP scores5.72 ± 0.575.08 ± 0.27<0.001
Laboratory Variables
WBC4.65 ± 1.845.74 ± 1.65<0.001
Hemoglobin12.98 ± 1.6614.33 ± 1.40<0.001
Platelets152.20 ± 85.86168.57 ± 55.210.163
Prothrombin time1.07 ± 0.091.02 ± 0.06<0.001
Creatinine; mg.dL−10.79 ± 0.180.84 ± 0.17<0.001
eGFR; mL/min/1.73m268.70 ± 14.6674.28 ± 13.090.125
Total bilirubin0.84 ± 0.470.77 ± 0.340.001
AST49.17 ± 45.7035.66 ± 20.68<0.001
ALT37.38 ± 32.2936.39 ± 25.550.049
Sodium139.27 ± 2.96140.10 ± 2.30<0.001
RDW13.52 ± 1.5512.91 ± 1.03<0.001
PNI40.38 ± 3.1849.77 ± 4.01<0.001
Intraoperative Variables
Operation time; min273.83 ± 85.49266.20 ± 76.290.028
Laparoscopic surgery67 (20.12)166 (22.68)0.392
Extensive surgery
(≥3 segments)
13 (3.90)29 (3.96)0.901
Total fluids; mL/kg42.01 ± 22.0238.06 ± 18.060.729
Colloid (mL/kg)4.80 ± 7.054.61 ± 5.200.002
Synthetic colloid use142 (42.64)388 (53.01)0.002
Urine output; mL/kg/hr1.89 ± 1.381.67 ± 1.050.469
Surgical outcomes of the study population
Prognostic Nutritional Index
<44 (n = 333)≥44 (n = 732)p-Value
Transfusions
RBC transfusion42 (12.61)21 (2.87)<0.001
FFP transfusion5 (1.50)2 (0.27)0.034
Platelet transfusion3 (0.90)0 (0.00)0.030
Massive transfusion (≥4 units)17 (5.11)7 (0.96)<0.001
Postoperative transfusion11 (3.30)22 (3.00)0.945
Surgical outcomes
Hospital days21.18 ± 14.1420.79 ± 12.650.851
AKI24 (7.21)41 (5.60)0.334
PHLF61 (18.32)34 (4.64)<0.001
ICU admission25 (7.51)53 (7.24)0.899
ICU stay (≥2 days)14 (4.20)18 (2.46)0.125
BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; CAD, coronary artery disease; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; CTP, Child–Turcotte–Pugh; WBC, white blood cell; eGFR, estimated glomerular filter ratio; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; RDW, red cell distribution width; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; SD, standard deviation; RBC, red blood cell; AKI, acute kidney injury; PHLF, post hepatectomy liver failure; ICU, intensive care unit. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (proportion).
Table 2. Univariate and multivariable analysis of the risk factors of intraoperative transfusion.
Table 2. Univariate and multivariable analysis of the risk factors of intraoperative transfusion.
UnivariateMultivariate
OR95% CIp-ValueOR95% CIp-Value
PNI (<44)5.253.04–9.08<0.0012.201.06–4.600.035
Age1.041.02–1.070.0021.041.01–1.080.010
Sex (male)0.940.50–1.760.835
BMI0.870.79–0.960.004
DM1.620.67–3.920.280
HTN1.740.77–3.980.186
MELD scores1.371.15–1.63<0.0011.261.00–1.610.054
CTP scores12.404.55–33.80<0.001
TNM staging 0.008
11.00(Ref.)
22.100.78–5.640.143
31.170.15–9.060.878
42.531.48–4.330.001
Hemoglobin0.570.49–0.67<0.0010.590.47–0.74<0.001
RDW1.341.16–1.53<0.0011.070.83–1.380.610
Operation time; min1.011.01–1.02<0.0011.021.01–1.02<0.001
Synthetic colloid use3.451.91–6.25<0.0012.301.12–4.730.024
Extensive surgery
(≥3 segments)
6.633.15–13.92<0.0011.360.48–3.850.561
Laparoscopic surgery0.170.05–0.540.0030.160.04–0.570.005
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; CTP, Child–Turcotte–Pugh; RDW, red cell distribution width; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; SD, standard deviation. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (proportion).
Table 3. Cox regression analysis of risk factors of 5-year survival.
Table 3. Cox regression analysis of risk factors of 5-year survival.
UnivariateMultivariate
HR95% CIp-ValueHR95% CIp-Value
PNI (<44)2.201.71–2.83<0.0011.681.27–2.24<0.001
Age1.000.99–1.010.6420.990.98–1.010.301
Sex (male)1.250.90–1.750.1861.140.81–1.610.461
BMI0.940.90–0.980.041
DM1.530.99–2.370.0571.490.94–2.350.087
HTN0.830.49–1.400.488
CAD0.940.23–3.750.924
MELD scores1.241.14–1.35<0.0011.171.06–1.290.002
CTP scores2.661.32–5.390.006
TNM staging <0.001 <0.001
11.00(Ref.) 1.00(Ref.)
21.650.94–2.880.0811.570.90–2.760.013
33.061.49–6.290.0022.611.26–5.390.010
43.722.86–4.85<0.0013.722.84–4.88<0.001
Hemoglobin0.850.79–0.92<0.001
RDW1.161.09–1.22<0.001
Operation time; min1.001.00–1.00<0.001
Synthetic Colloid use1.491.16–1.920.0021.701.31–2.22<0.001
Laparoscopic surgery0.500.35–0.72<0.001
Transfusion4.002.83–5.66<0.0012.211.51–3.23<0.001
HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; CTP, Child–Turcotte–Pugh; RDW, red cell distribution width; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; SD, standard deviation. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (proportion).
Table 4. Transfusion and surgical outcomes adjusted by preoperative PNI level (<44).
Table 4. Transfusion and surgical outcomes adjusted by preoperative PNI level (<44).
UnivariateMultivariate
OR95% CIp-ValueOR95% CI *p-Value
RBC transfusion5.253.04–9.08<0.0012.201.06–4.600.035
PHLF4.602.96–7.16<0.0013.021.87–4.87<0.001
HR95% CIp-valueHR95% CI †p-value
1-year survival3.862.30–6.48<0.0012.981.66–5.38<0.001
5-year survival2.451.83–3.29<0.0011.681.27–2.24<0.001
* Adjusted for age, MELD, hemoglobin, RDW, operation time, laparoscopic surgery, synthetic colloid use, and extensive surgery. † Adjusted for age, sex, DM, TNM staging, MELD, synthetic colloid use, and RBC transfusion. OR, odds ratio; HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; RBC, red blood cell; PHLF, post hepatectomy liver failure; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; RDW, red cell distribution width; SD, standard deviation. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (proportion).
Table 5. Improvement in the AUC and NRI by adding PNI to the clinical predictive models.
Table 5. Improvement in the AUC and NRI by adding PNI to the clinical predictive models.
AUC (95% CI)p-ValueNRI (95% CI)p-Value
TransfusionModel 1 *0.757 (0.694–0.820)
Model 1 * + PNI0.768 (0.702–0.834)0.5060.392 (0.143–0.641)0.002
5-year survivalModel 2 †0.725 (0.692–0.758)
Model 2 † + PNI0.742 (0.710–0.773)0.0210.136 (0.041–0.213)0.004
* Model 1 = age + MELD + hemoglobin. † Model 2 = age + sex + DM + TNM staging + MELD + synthetic colloid use + RBC transfusion. AUC, areas under the curves; CI, confidence interval; NRI, net reclassification index; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; RBC, red blood cell; SD, standard deviation. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (proportion).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sim, J.H.; Kim, S.-H.; Jun, I.-G.; Kang, S.-J.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.; Song, J.-G. The Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Intraoperative Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112508

AMA Style

Sim JH, Kim S-H, Jun I-G, Kang S-J, Kim B, Kim S, Song J-G. The Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Intraoperative Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers. 2021; 13(11):2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sim, Ji Hoon, Sung-Hoon Kim, In-Gu Jun, Sa-Jin Kang, Bomi Kim, Seonok Kim, and Jun-Gol Song. 2021. "The Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Intraoperative Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study" Cancers 13, no. 11: 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112508

APA Style

Sim, J. H., Kim, S. -H., Jun, I. -G., Kang, S. -J., Kim, B., Kim, S., & Song, J. -G. (2021). The Association between Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Intraoperative Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers, 13(11), 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop